Analysis Of The Performance Of Employees With The Methods .

3y ago
39 Views
6 Downloads
546.18 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 24d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Bria Koontz
Transcription

Volume 5, Issue 8, August – 2020International Journal of Innovative Science and Research TechnologyISSN No:-2456-2165Analysis of the Performance of Employees with theMethods of Human Resources Scorecard andAnalytical Hierarchy Process in the LaborOutsourcing CompanyKharisma Islamy1, Erry Rimawan 2, Farih Hidayat3, Farid Faraitody4Department of Industrial Engineering1,2, Department of Magister Management3,4Mercu Buana University, Jakarta, IndonesiaAbstract:- Corporate services are service providers. Agood service company should give the best possibleservice in order to create its own satisfaction forcustomers. Therefore, there is a greet need for qualifiedhuman resources. A company’s success is based on it’sperformance, if an employee’s performance is bad thenit produces a bad company. This is where humanresources are concerned. With the methods of HumanResources Scorecard and Analytical Hierarchy Processthis can help to see if the company’s employee’sperformance is good or not. On the method of HumanResources Scorecard are the four perspectives offinancial perspectives, customer perspectives, internalbusiness process perspectives, and learning & growthperspectives. The four perspectives have the strategy ofobjectivity, from the strategy of objectivity, the keyperformance indicator. Research result from the use ofboth method of human resources scorecard andanalytical hierarchy process, show that the employeeperformance assessments in this company haveincreased from a 4,03 score which can mean goodemployee performance to 4,51 which can mean verygood employee performance.Keywords:- Employee Performance, Human ResourcesScorecard, Analytical Hierarchy Process.I.INTRODUCTIONThe role of employees is very important to thecompany. Each company is required to raise itsperformance in the face of competence. That’s why it’simportant to perform an employee performance evaluationon the company. To see whether the company has optimalperformance attainment. Companies need to measure theirperformance comprehensive so that they can know whatfactors have not been reached to shape better employeequality performance. Moreover, shaping these companieswith a focus on outsource resource providers is expectedthat they will also be able to help improve the quality of thework given to them by outsource employees.The company is present among business people in thecountry to join hands with all stakeholders in findingsolutions to optimize the management of business processesand the availability of labour support. The competentprofessional to maintain adaptability to changes whilesupporting the business objectives of the customercompany is more sustainable.It is hoped that in the next five years, the companywill be able to show continued growth with the applicationof new technologies and comprehensive services inemployment to its cusctomers. Each company has its ownstrategy map to achieving the corporate vision. Here is thecompany’s strategy map:Fig 1Source: Company data, 2019IJISRT20AUG611www.ijisrt.com1615

Volume 5, Issue 8, August – 2020International Journal of Innovative Science and Research TechnologyISSN No:-2456-2165To achieve the corporate vision, it requires a strategymap like the diagram above. Each perspectives has its ownstrategy, from financial to learning & growth.II.REVIEW OF LITERATURE STUDY PerformancePerformance is the extent of one’s success in carryingout a task to accomplish a set global. The factor thatinfluences performance is the ability and motivationfactors. The purpose of the measuring of employeeperformance is as follows:Knowing the extent of the organiztions’s expansion ofpurpose Provide staff learning tool Improve performance next period Gives systematic consideration to decision-making Motivate the staff Creates public accountability Human Resources ScorecardHuman Resources Scorecard is a comprehensivesystem of measuring human resource performance bydescribing company vision, mission and strategy. Thedifference between human resources scorecard withbalanced scorecard is that balanced scorecard measures acompany’s performance of proportionate assets whilehuman resources scorecard weighs more than the humanresources performance with artificial assets. The followingare steps in measuring human resources scorecard: Define the company’s strategy clearly Creating a company strategy map Identify HR Deliverable on the strategy map Designing a system for measruring strategy Managing implementation through measurement Human Resources Scorecard as a Model of MeasuringHuman’s tiveness and efficiency of human data sources inmobilizing employee behavior to achieve company strategygoals and thus can help demonstrate how human resourcescontribute to financial successs and company strategies.According to the beker al (2001) the basis for strategichuman resources roles consists of a three-dimensional valuechain developed by the corporate human resourcesarchitecture, which is the function, systems and behavior ofthe work. The architecture of human resources can be seenin the accompanying picture:Fig 2:- Human Resources Architecture Analytical Hierarchy ProcessAnalytical hierarchy process is an ideal method thatcan provide an alternative level or level description whensome criteria and sub-criteria in the dicision makingprocess. Measures in the use of the analytical hierarchyprocess method by saaty (1988) as follows: Define the problem and elaborate the desired solution Load the corresponding matrix needed to develop thematrix device Synthesize the data in a matrix pair Testing consistency and priorities that have beenacquired Take the top steps for each level Using hierarchical compositons Using hierarchical composition to cover priority vectorswith criteria weightIJISRT20AUG611 Evaluating consistency for the whole hierarchy byquantifying each consistency index with the priority ofthe corresponding criteriaIII.METHODOLOGYThe purpose of this research is to measure theperformance of human resources and human resources ifthe workman is already optimal or not yet. This research isa descriptive research using the Human ResourcesScorecard method and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)method. Descriptive research is research that aims toexplain problem solving based on facts in the field bypresenting data, analyzing, and interpreting. This researchis a quantitative research. In this study using two types ofdata, namely primary data and secondary data.www.ijisrt.com1616

Volume 5, Issue 8, August – 2020International Journal of Innovative Science and Research TechnologyISSN No:-2456-2165IV.RESULTBelow is perspective data in the company based on negotiations between company leaders and researchers with theobjectivity strategy and key performance indicators:PerspectiveObjective StrategyKey Performance IndicatorIncreased Employee ProductivityCreating a Comfortable Work EnvironmentIncreased Employee WelfareProviding Guarantees to EmployeesMaximizing the Use of Company AssetsUsing Company Assets as NeededInvestment Strategy OptimizationUnderstanding Risk ToleranceIncreased Employee Satisfaction with WorkProvide the best serviceImproving Service Quality for CustomersListen to customer complaintsIncreased Customer LoyaltyPrioritize Service to CustomersIncreased Customer NeedsComplete All Customer NeedsImproved Communication Between EmployeesDoing Team Work in rotationImproved Product Quality ProvidedReviewing CustomersSuperior LeadershipCreating Good Communication To EmployeesImproved Occupational Safety and HealthConducting a Regular Work Environment CheckIncreased Hard Skill of EmployeesTightening When Accepting New EmployeesIncreased Soft Skill of EmployeesConduct Training for New EmployeesImproved Employee EvaluationConducting Employee RatingsCustomerCustomerInternal BusinessProcessLearning &GrowthImprovement of Recruitment StandardsMake Employee Criteria StandardsTable 1:- Objective Strategies and Key Performance IndicatorsCriteriaFinancialCustomerInternal BusinessLearning & growthTotalPriority 70.390.200.551.710.43Internal Business Process0.100.390.200.100.790.20Learning & Growth0.090.070.210.100.480.12TotalTable 2:- Normalizing the Criteria Tab1.00After getting the weight of each perspective, the next step is to calculate the value of the consistency ratio. As a reference ofthe ratio value, a data can be said to be consistent if it has a value smaller than 10% or 0.1. After obtaining a consistency ratio forall consistency criteria and sub-criteria further testing consistency for the entire hierarchy with the formula: 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑠 𝑛𝑛 1𝐶𝐼𝐶𝑅 𝑅𝐼𝐶𝐼 CR Consistency RatioRI Random IndexN Order AmountIJISRT20AUG611www.ijisrt.com1617

Volume 5, Issue 8, August – 2020International Journal of Innovative Science and Research TechnologyISSN No:-2456-2165Table 3:- Ratio Comparison RecapitulationThe following is a recapitulation of the values of the consistency ratio of each perspective:After scoring key performance indicator, the next step is weighting each key performance index with a key performanceindicator score. After calculating the weighted scores in each key performance indicator perspective, the next step is to measurethe performance of employees in each perspective with a weighted score. Here is the measurement table:KPI perspectiveMarch - Augst 2019Septemper 2019 - February 2020WieghtScoreWeighted ScoreWeightScoreWeighted ScorePerspective Financial0.263.851.000.264.471.16Perspective Customer0.434.181.800.434.551.96Perspective Internal Business0.203.650.730.204.070.81Perspective Learning & GrowthTotal0.124.220.510.124.800.584.03Table 4:- Measurement of each perspective with a weighted scoreAfter finding the weighted results in each perspective,it then determines employee performance appraisal to findout whether it is good or not. Following is the performanceevaluation: Weight 1.0 - 1.8 Very poor employee performance Weight 1.8 - 2.6 Poor employee performance Weight 2.6 - 3.4 Moderate employee performance Weights 3,4 - 4,2 Good employee performance Weight 4.2 - 5.0 Very good employee performanceBased on the weight of the employee performanceappraisal above from the perspective of the humanresources scorecard, it can be concluded that in March toAugust 2019 a weighted score of 4.03 can be interpreted asgood employee performance, while in the septermber 2019to February 2020 get a weighted score of 4.51 which can beinterpreted as very good employee performance. Thus, thiscompany has a very good performance due to the absenceof significant changes.V.CONCLUSIONSMeasurement of employee performance with thescorecard human resource method and analytic hierarchyprocess method produces a financial perspective, customerperspective, internal business process perspective, andlearning & growth perspective in March 20219 - August2019 with a total score of 4.03 which can be interpreted asperformance very kind employees. While in SeptemberIJISRT20AUG6114.512019 - February 2020 had a total score of 4.51 which canbe interpreted as very good employee performance.Increase the ability to improve performance of outsourcingcompanies to improve performance.REFERENCES[1]. Anwar, S. 2011. Supply Chain Management:Concepts and Nature. Journal of InformationTechnology Dynamics, 3 (2)[2]. Becker Brian E, Hunselik Mark A, Ulrich Dave. 2001.“The HR Scorecard : Lingking People, Strategy, andPerformance” , Harvard School Press.[3]. Christoper & Scooner. 2007. Incrementalism: Erodingthe Impediments to a Global Public ProcurementMarket. Journal of International Law. Page 529[4]. Hayati, E.N. 2014.Supply Chain Management (SCM)and Logistics Management. Technical Dynamics, Vol8 (1). Pages 25-34[5]. Kadarshah, S., and Ramdhani, A. 2000. DecisionSupport Systems A Structural Discourse Idealizationand Implementation of Decision DevelopmentConcepts, 2nd ed., Wuly Anisah, Ed. Bandung,Indonesia: PT. Teenage Workshop[6]. Kaplan, Robert S, and Norton, David P. 2000.“Balanced Scorecard : Implement strategy intoaction”, Jakarta: Erlangga Publisher.www.ijisrt.com1618

Volume 5, Issue 8, August – 2020International Journal of Innovative Science and Research TechnologyISSN No:-2456-2165[7]. Pujawan, I.N., and Mahendrawathi. 2010. SupplyManagement. Surabaya: For Widya[8]. Rainnita 2013. Evaluation of Suppliers of Cement,Bricks and Sand Using Analitycal Hierarchy ProcessMethod in CV. Bagiyat Mitra Perkasa. ST.Soegijapranata Catholic University of Semarang.[9]. Saaty, T.L. 1990. How To Make a Decision: TheAnalytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal ofOperational Research 48, Vol. 48.[10]. Saaty, T.L. 1994. Fundamentals of Decision Makingand Priority Theory With The Analytic HierarchyProcess. RWS Publication: Pittsburgh.[11]. Supardi, E. 2016. Export Import Theory andPracticum of Import Export Activities for Logisticsand Business Practitioners (1). 619

Human Resources Scorecard Human Resources Scorecard is a comprehensive system of measuring human resource performance by describing company vision, mission and strategy. The difference between human resources scorecard with balanced scorecard is that balanced scorecard measures a

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. 3 Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.