Strategic Plan - Colheights.k12.mn.us

Strategic PlanColumbia Heights High School ScorecardPrincipal Dan WrobleskiOctober 28, 2014Creating College and Career Ready Graduates

STRATEGIC PLANC O LU M B I A H E I G H T S H I G H S C H O O L2 01 3 - 2 01 4

CHHS ENROLLMENT950900850800750700650600

CHHS STUDENT BODY2014 Student Population3%6%28%24%American IndianAsianHispanicBlack39%White

CHHS STUDENT BODY

GRADUATION 00%20.00%10.00%0.00%200920102011201220132014

CHPS STRATEGIC ROADMAP

STRATEGIC PLAN SCORECARDINSTRUCTION50 %MeasureWtA1: Use of articulated,standards-basedcurriculumAtlasA2: Licensed staff activelyengaged in PLC’s 4questions monthly at theminimum15%A3: Use of formativestudent learning data todifferentiate instructionMoodle, MasteryQuizzesA5: Presence and use ofclassroom - embedded21st Century learningMoodleA6: Percentage ofevaluated teaching staffat the basic/ proficientfor non-tenured andproficient /distinguishedlevel for tenured oninstruction measuresEvaluationsLevel 4Progressing4.0 – 4.985 – 89 % ofall classroomsLevel 5Vision5.0 90 % of allclassrooms15%Less than 30% 30- 49% of all 50 - 69% ofof all licensed licensed staff all licensedstaffstaff70 - 89% ofall licensedstaff95% of alllicensed staff20%Less than 75% of allclassrooms75 – 79 % ofall classrooms80 – 84 % ofall classrooms85 – 89 % ofall classrooms90 % of allclassroomsLess than 50% of allclassrooms50 – 69 % ofall classrooms70 – 80 % ofall classrooms81 – 89 % ofall classrooms90 % of allclassroomsLess than 50% of allteachers50 - 59% ofall teachers60 - 69% ofall teachers70 - 79% ofall teachers80% of allteachers15 %10%Level 1Intervention1.0 – 1.9Less than 75% of allclassroomsLevel 2High Concern2.0 – 2.975 – 79 % ofall classroomsLevel 3Baseline3.0 – 3.980 – 84 % ofall classrooms

STRATEGIC PLAN SCORECARDSUPPORT30 %MeasureWtLevel 1Intervention1.0 – 1.9Less than 75% of allStudentsLevel 2High Concern2.0 – 2.975 – 79 % ofall StudentsLevel 3Baseline3.0 – 3.980 – 84 % ofall StudentsLevel 4Progressing4.0 – 4.985 – 89 % ofall StudentsLevel 5Vision5.0 90 % of allStudentsA7: Presence of multitiered interventions foracademicsCheck and Connect,Reset CommitteeA8: Presence of multitiered interventions forbehaviorCustomized PBISStrategiesA10: Presence ofAchievement ViaIndividual Determination(AVID) strategies grades9-1230%30%Less than 30% of allclassrooms30 – 50 % ofall classrooms51 – 79 % ofall classrooms81 – 89 % ofall classrooms90 % of allclassrooms20%Less than 50% of allclassrooms50 – 59 % ofallclassrooms60 – 69 % ofallclassrooms70 – 79 % ofallclassrooms80 % of allclassroomsA11: Parent involvement(student achievement)School View, PTO,Parent Breakfast,Weekly All Calls%Less than 50% of parents50 – 59 % ofparents60 – 69 % ofparents70 – 79 % ofparents80 % ofparents

STRATEGIC PLAN SCORECARDPARTICIPATIONMeasureWtLevel 1Intervention1.0 – 1.9Level 2High Concern2.0 – 2.9Level 3Baseline3.0 – 3.9Level 4Progressing4.0 – 4.9Level 5Vision5.0 A13: 6-12 Participationin arts, activities andathleticsChoir, Band, Athletics,Activities30%Less than 65% of studentsare engaged65 – 69 % ofstudents areengaged70 – 74 % ofstudents areengaged75 – 79 % ofstudents areengaged80 % ofstudents areengagedA14: Participation gapbetween student groupsparticipating in arts,activities and athletics(groups include gender,F/R, ethnicity)30%30% - 26%gap25% - 21%gap20% - 16%gap15% - 10%gap 10% gap

STRATEGIC PLAN SCORECARDPROFICIENCYMeasureWt.B5: MinnesotaComprehensive Assessment(MCA) Reading scores allgrades tested30%B6: MCA Math scoresall grades tested30%B7: MCA Science scoresall grades tested10%B8: MCA gap to standardfor student groups inReading or Math30%30%Level 1Intervention1.0 – 1.9 60% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient 49% of allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient 60% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient 35% of allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient 35% of allstudentsassessed areproficientGreater than 45% difference forany studentgroup tostandardLevel 2High Concern2.0 – 2.960% - 64% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient50% - 54% allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient60% - 64% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient35% - 39% allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient35% - 39% allstudentsassessed areproficient35 - 44 %difference forany studentgroup tostandardLevel 3Baseline3.0 – 3.965% - 69% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient55% - 59% allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient65% - 69% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient40% - 44% allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient40% - 44% allstudentsassessed areproficient25 - 34 %difference forany studentgroup tostandardLevel 4Progressing4.0 – 4.970% - 74% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient60% - 64% of allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient70% - 74% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient45% - 49% of allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient45% - 49% of allstudentsassessed areproficient15 - 24 %difference forany studentgroup tostandardLevel 5Vision5.0 75% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient65% of allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient75% of allelementarystudentsassessed areproficient50% of allsecondarystudentsassessed areproficient50% of allstudentsassessed areproficientLess than 14 %difference forany studentgroup tostandard

STRATEGIC PLAN SCORECARDWtLevel 1Intervention1.0 – 1.9B11 ACT participationgrades 11 – 1210%Less than 25 % ofstudentsparticipating25 - 40 % ofstudentsparticipating41 - 55 % ofstudentsparticipating56 - 69 % ofstudentsparticipating70 % of studentsparticipatingB13 Referrals out-of-class(CHHS)REAL Expectations50%Greater than 3,000referrals per year3,000 - 2,500referrals per year2,499 - 2,000referrals per year1,999 - 1,500referrals per yearLess than 1,500referrals per yearB14: Difference betweenstudent groups in referrals outof-class30%Greater than 40 %difference for anystudent group todemographics30 - 39 %difference for anystudent group todemographics20 - 29 %difference for anystudent group todemographics10 - 19 %difference for anystudent group todemographicsLess than 10 %difference for anystudent group todemographicsGreater than 425incidents per year425 - 400 incidentsper year399 - 375 incidentsper year374 - 350 incidentsper yearLess than 350incidents per yearMeasureB15 Out-of-school suspensionincidents20%Level 2High Concern2.0 – 2.9Level 3Baseline3.0 – 3.9Level 4Progressing4.0 – 4.9Level 5Vision5.0

STRATEGIC PLAN SCORECARDWtMeasureB20 College entrance rate aftera readiness programAchievement Via IndividualDetermination (AVID)/Admission Possible10%Level 1Intervention1.0 – 1.9 60% of studentsLevel 2High Concern2.0 – 2.960% - 69% ofstudentsLevel 3Baseline3.0 – 3.970% - 79% ofstudentsLevel 4Progressing4.0 – 4.980% - 89% ofstudentsLevel 5Vision5.0 90 % of students

GOAL: MATH Improve the Math MCA proficiency rate for the 2014-2015school year by 10% Mastery quizzes Pre-Algebra intervention course Cumulative reviews for Algebra, Advanced Algebra, Geometry, andAlgebra through Statistical Analysis Math support in the Homework Center Check and Connect program Continuation of math PLC for staff MCA target group intervention Test preparation strategies across school Testing Task Force Family Engagement and Equity Committees

GOAL: READING Improve the Reading MCA proficiency rate for the 2014 -2015school year by 10% English 10 intervention courseCheck and Connect programEnglish support in the Homework CenterProfessional development support for the faculty in implementingreading strategiesMultidisciplinary PLC to address readingMCA target group interventionTest preparation strategies across schoolTesting Task ForceFamily Engagement and Equity Committees

GOAL: REDUCTION OF ACHIEVEMENT GAP Reduce the achievement gap for each sub group for the 2014 2015 school year by 5% Equity teamTesting Task ForceHeritage celebrationsHomework CenterCheck and Connect programFamily Involvement LiaisonParent BreakfastsPTO engaging families from various backgroundsFamily Engagement Committee

GOAL: GRADUATION RATE Columbia Heights High School will improve the overallgraduation rate for the 2014 -2015 school year from 78.8% to85% Dean Model Tiered Intervention System to Monitor Student Credits and Behaviors College and Career Readinessprograms Genesys WorksAVIDCollege PossibleRamp Up for ReadinessFine ArtsAPPSEO

GOAL: CONTINUATION OF THE RESETCOMMITTEE Develop comprehensive school climate plan that incorporatesdistrict center departments (first year focus is primarily onschool-wide system) Develop strong, cohesive building administration Develop strong communication between buildingadministration and staf f Develop numerous positive support mechanisms to improveschool pride and climate Develop mechanisms in the building to provide safe climatefor all Identify process of assistance for at -risk students identifiedearly Create a data management system that identifies at -riskstudents early and allows for monitoring of their progress

2013-2014 MMR Score 26.42% in 2013 School Year 69.44% in 2014 School Year MDE Celebration Eligible School 1 of 217 Schools in the State 1 of 20 High Schools in the State 1 of 5 High Schools in the Metro Area

CURRENT STRENGTHS:COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS AVID (100% Acceptance Into 4 year College/University)AP Courses (13 Courses Of fered)College Possible (100% Acceptance Into College/University)Genesys Works (Achiever Award 2014; 98% CollegeCompletion Rate)Power of YouLocal Scholarships ( 277,500)Ramp Up to ReadinessSTRIVE (Students TakingRenewed Interest in theValue of Education)College Planning Checklist

CURRENT STRENGTHS:FINE ARTS Gold and Silver Key Awards 12 Spotlight Awards

CURRENT STRENGTHS:REAL EXPECTATIONS Customized PBIS Strategies REAL Expectations Hylander Nation Academic Award Incentives 58% Drop In Out of School Suspensions 16% Drop In Out of Classroom Referrals 17% Drop in Student Failure Rate 9% Increase in Student Enrollment

VISION FOR THE FUTURE Continued Academic Success MCA Scores College Acceptance Student Recruitment College and Career Readiness Pathway E-12 Pathway to Collegeand Career Readiness Early College Program(Anoka Ramsey) Continued Strengtheningof our College PreparationPrograming

CHHS ypqj

Moodle, Mastery Quizzes 20 % Less than 75 % of all classrooms 75 –79 % of all classrooms 80 –84 % of all classrooms 85 –89 % of all classrooms 90 % of all classrooms A5: Presence and use of classroom - embedded 21st Century learning Moodle 15 % Less than 50 % of all classrooms 50 –69 % of all classrooms 70 –80 % of all classrooms 81 .