Analysis Of Heat Transfer In Metal Hydride Based Hydrogen .

2y ago
18 Views
2 Downloads
4.61 MB
127 Pages
Last View : 18d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Victor Nelms
Transcription

WSRC-TR-99-O0348,Rev. 2Analysis of Heat Transfer in Metal Hydride Based HydrogenSeparationby4!!c4@ fq?Q&p*/W. H. Fleming Jr.Westinghouse Savannah River CompanySavannah River SiteAiken, South Carolina 29808DOE Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500This paper was prepared in connection with work done under the above contract number with the U. S.Department of Energy. By acceptance of this paper, the publisher and/or recipient acknowledges the U. S.Government’s right to retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering this paper,along with the right to reproduce and to authorize others to reproduce all or part of the copyrighted paper.,’“%

DISCLAIMER‘17hisreport was prepared zisan account of work sponsored by an agency of the United StatesGovernment. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of theiremployees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability orresponsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefuI.nessof any information, apparatus,product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately ownedrights. Referenceherein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name,trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarilyconstitute or imply its endorsement,recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Theviews and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of theUnited States Government or any agency thereof.This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy.Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Officeof Scientificand Technical Information,P. O. Box62,Oak Ridge,TN 37831;prices available from (423)576-8401.Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U. S. Department ofCommerce,5285Port RoyalRoad, Springfield,VA22161.

DISCLAIMERPoflions of this document may be illegiblein electronic image products. Images areproduced from the best avaiiable originaldocument. —

WSRC-TR-99-00348, Rev. 2ANALYSIS OF HEAT TRANSFERIN A METAL HYDRIDE BASEDHYDROGEN SEPARATION PROCESS‘William H. Herring, Jr.Bachelor of ScienceUniversity of Florida, ------------Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree ofMaster of Science in theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering “University of South Carolina1999Department of Mechanical EngineeringDirector of ThesisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering2nd Reader.Dean of the Graduate School.- . . . . . .- .,,

x WSRC-TR-99-00348, Rev. 2ACKNOWLEDGEMENTI would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation to the faculty ofthe Department of Mechanical Engineering for their investment in my graduateeducation. I thank my advisor, Dr. Jamil A. Khan for his tireless support, guidance andsupervision during the course of this work. I would also like to thank the second readerof this thesis, Dr. Curtis A. Rhodes for his valuable input and encouragement.I would like to thank Dr. L. Kit Heung, Nagarajan Shanmuganathan, and DonnaHasty of the Savannah River Site for their assistance and encouragement during thiswork.Finally, I would like to express my appreciation to my wife Tanya for hercontinued patience, understanding, and support not only for this endeavor, but throughoutmy graduate studies.—.-.--A.:.-----. .---.—------–.--—----. .,-””--ii-. ,. :?., ,,, .,,;,,,J.,,. .,, .,‘.,. ,,e,. .,,-.- ,. , ,,.-. . . . .-.2. —.,-:---. ,* . .—-.-.-7--,,

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2ABSTRACTThe Thermal Cycling Absorption Process (TCAP) is a metal hydride basedhydrogen separation system configured as a helical shell-and-tube heat exchanger. Thecolumn (tube side) is packed with Palladium deposited on kieselguhr (Pal/k). This packedcolumn is thermally cycled by a hot and cold nitrogen system on its exterior surface(shell side), while a stream of hydrogen and other inert gases are passed through thepacked column. Hydrogen gas is absorbed and desorbed from the Palladium, causing aseparation from the gas stream. The rate at which the hydrogen is separated is dependentonly upon how quickly the Pal/k can be thermally cycled.This thesis presents a transient heat transfer analysis to model the heat transfer inthe Pal/k packed column, and the impact of adding metallic foam. Thermal cycling timesfor varying packed column diameters, materials, and compositions are also determined.A parametric based argument is presented to optimize the material selection andgeometric design basis of a TCAP heat exchanger.111

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2Acknowledgement . *.*.**. Abstract .*** . . . . .*.*. Contents .**.* . . . . .*.*.**.**.*.*.*.*. . . .****List of Figures .**:*.*** .*****.** . . ii. ****.**.* . .0. .*.*.*.O.*. . . . . . . . . . . . . iv.*.*.* . .0 . .**.m .*.*.*. . . . . . . . . viNomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Chapter 1 Introduction . .**.*.*.ix. . . . . . . . . *. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 l.l General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11.2 Literature Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Chapter 2 Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122.2 Specific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13Chapter 3 Analytical Model ***.**** .00000.0. . . .0.0.**.* 153.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .153.2 Critical Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .193.3 Input andRelatedData . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .203.4 Shell Side–Nitrogen HeatTransferCoefflcients.3.5 TubeSide–Pd/kPackedColumn. . . . . . . . . .27HeatTransferCoefflcients.323.6 Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient at Pal/k Column Wall. . . . . .373.7 Heats ofReaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .383.8 TransientTemperatureCalculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39iv.

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 23.9 Pressure Dropinthe Nitrogen Side . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53Chapter 4 Experimental Apparatus and Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554.2 ExperimentalWork4.3 Results ofTransientTests. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .624.4 Experimental Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,Chapter 5 ResuIts and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .775.1 Review ofAnalytical Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .‘. 775.2 DefinitionofCases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .785.3 Effect ofVaryingNitrogenFlow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .795.4 Effect ofIncreasingColumnDiameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825.5 Effect ofDifferentColumnWallMaterials5.6 EffectofAddingDifferentMetalFoams5.7 CycleTimeswithVariedParameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .875.8 Effect ofVaryingTimeInterval.5.9 ComparisonofResults. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .89. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .89Chapter 6 Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1036.2 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-.105Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . v . . . 108I

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2.List of FiguresFigure 3.1Axial Cross Section of TCAP Heat Exchanger Showing Flow Paths. 16Figure 3.2Detailed Fabrication Drawing of TCAP Heat Exchanger.“22Figure 3.3Detailed Fabrication Drawing of Column in Annulus23Figure 3.4Bill of Materials for TCAP Heat ExchangerFigure 3.5Axial Cross Section of TC/@ Heat Exchanger Showing Sections.24Used in Transient Temperature Calculations42Figure 4.1Lab Equipment Schematic58Figure 4.2Surface Temperature Response of Long Cylinder After Sudden Exposureto Uniform Convective EnvironmentFigure 4.365Centerline Temperature Response of Long Cylinder After SuddenExposure To Uniform Convective Environment65Figure 4.4Measured Temperature Transients for Centerlines of Aluminum Bar 66Figure 4.5Measured and Theoretical Temperature Transients for Centerlines ofFigure 4.6Spheres66Transient ‘Coil 1 and 1 Atrn73vi

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2Figure 4.7Transient for Coil 2 and 1 Atm73Figure 4.8Transient for Coil 3 and 1 Atm74Figure 4.9Temperature Distribution at Various in a Cylinder of Radius R with ZeroInitial Temperature and Surface Temperature V.74Figure 4.10Transient Average Temperature in Cylinder with Conduction75Figure 4.11Temperature Transients at Centerline of Sphere76Figure 4.12Temperature Transients at Centerline of Sphere Times for K Divided by1.476Figure 5.1Cooling Times vs. Cold Nitrogen Flow Rate93Figure 5.2Heating Times vs. Hot Nitrogen Flow Rate94Figure 5.3.Reynolds Number in Sections vs. Cooling Time95Figure 5.4Reynolds Number in Sections vs. Heating Time96Figure 5.5Effective Cold Heat Transfer Coefficient for Pal/k-foam Packed Column97Figure 5.6Effective Hot Heat Transfer Coefficient for Pal/k-foam Packed Column98Figure 5.7Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient at Packed Column for 7000 lbs/hr Cold99Nitrogen FIQwvii.—.-

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2Figure 5.8Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient at Packed Column for 7000 lbs/hr HotNitrogen Flow.100Figure 5.9Cooling Cycle Times at 7000 lbs/hr Nitrogen for All Cases101Figure 5.10Heating Cycle Times at 7000 lbs/hr Nitrogen for All Cases102.Vlll.

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2—NomenclatureAArea, cross sectional or surface, ft2AmnulU ‘Free cross sectional area in the annulus, ft2AlfoamAluminum foamatmAtmospheresBtuBritish Thermal UnitscConstant for Zukauskas tube bank correlationsC2Correction factor for Zukauskas tube bank correlationsCgenHeat Capacitance of Absorption/Desorption, Btu/ FCpSpecific Heat, Btu/lb” FCpl, cp2.Specific heat of Section 1, Section 2. typical, Btu/lb. FCpNSpecific Heat of Nitrogen; Btu/lb. FCu “CopperCufoamCopper foamDDiameter, inside or outside, ftDPParticle diameter, ftdpPressure drop, psiEgEnergy generation, Btu“ix.

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2.Ei Energy transfer into a control volume, BtuEOUtEnergy transfer out of a control volume, BtuE tEnergy stored within a control volume, BtufFriction factorFoFourier NumberGMass velocity, ft/sec. ftzgcGravitational constant, 32.17 ft.lb/lbf.s2hHeat transfer coefficient, Btu/h ft2.0FhcConvective heat transfer coefficient, BtuhhCO.@tThermal contact conductance, Btu/hr. ft2.0FhNNitrogen side heat transfer coefficients, BtuhhP&Pd/kpacked column side heat transfer coefficient, Btu/h ft2.0FhPWO Pal/k with foam packed column side heat transfer coefficient,Btuh ft2.0FhWApparent heat transfer coefficient at packed column wall, Btu/hr.ft2”0F.H2HydrogenkThermal conductivity, Btu/h ft” FkcolwallThermal conductivity in column wall, Btu/h ft. FLEffective thermal conductivity in packed column, Btdl-m ft. FkeffwfoamEffective thermal conductivity in packed column with foam,Btu/hr” ft. FkfThermal conductivity of fluid in packed column, Btuhxft2”0Fft2.0Ffi” F

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2kfoamThermal conductivity of foam in packed column, Btu/hr. ft” FkowApparent thermal conductivity of fluid in packed column at wall,Btu/h ft. F,k,Thermal conductivity of solid in packed column, Btu/hr. ft” FLLength, ftml, m2.Mass of Section 1, Section 2, . . typical, IbsNLNumber of tubes in longitudinal directionnofoamNo foamNUDNusselt Number based upon diameterODOutside Diameter, ftPPorosityPrPrandtl Numberpsipounds-force per square inchpsiapounds-force per square inch absoluteROuter Radius, ftReReynolds NumberReDReynolds Number based upon diameterRemModified Reynolds Number for use in packed columnrpmRotations per minuteslpmStandard liters per minuteSsStainless Steel (Type 316)STPStandard Temperature and Pressure, 32 ‘F at 1’atmTNSupply Temperature of Nitrogen, ‘F. .xi.-. .— -—. . .-

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2TN1, TN2.Nitrogen temperature at Section 1, Section 2, ‘F, typicalT,Surface temperature, ‘FT.Free stream temperature, ‘FU.Overall heat trimsfer coefficient, Btu/hr. ft2.0FvVelocity, ft/secv,Superficial velocity in packed column, ft/secVolVolume, ft3wMass flow rate, lbs/hrWNNitrogen mass flow rate, lbs/hrGreek Letterscf.Thermal diffusivity, ft2/secxCorrection factor for in-line tube arrangement from ZukauskascorrelationACharacteristic lengthApPressure drop, psiAQ1, AQ2.Heat transferred in section 1, section 2 . . typical, BtuAQgenHeat generated by heat of absorption/desoqtion in packed column,BtuAtTime interval, seccAverage void fraction in packed columnE Average void fraction in packed column in vicinity of wall Effective thickness of fluid filmxii.

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2@wEffective thickness of fluid film in packed column in vicinity ofwall.‘YConstant for effective thermal conductivity in geometric arraysPAbsolute Viscosity, lb/ft”secPMass density, lb/ ft3SubscriptsfFinal conditionsiInitial conditions, control volume inlet, InnermaxMaximum fluid velocitynnth time stepoOutersSwirl-flowxCross-flow1.25Parameters for 1.25 inch diameter packed column2Parameters for 2 inch dia&eter packed columnSuperscripts‘ (prime)Intermittent valuemConstant for Zukauskas tube bank correlations. .XIII, T.- —.

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2Chapter 1INTRODUCTION1.1 GeneralAccording to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [1993],66% of carbon monoxide emissions and 50% of smog-forming emissions come fromgasoline-powered vehicles. Due to the world’s dependence upon the use of internalcombustion engines for mobility, transportation is responsible for about 33% of the airpollutants that affect the ozone layer. In fact, over half of the air-toxin problemsassociated with air pollution are attributable to these vehicles. Influenced byenvironmental concerns, a larger effort is necessary to provide automobiles with cleanerburning fuels.Automotive air-pollution problems first became apparent in the 1940s in LosAngeles. Almost 50 years have passed since Prof. A.J. Haagen-Smit [1952]demonstrated that the smog problem in Los Angeles resulted from reactions betweennitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in the presence of sunlight. Since then, it has becomeincreasingly clear that the automobile is a major contributor to hydrocarbon and nitrogenoxide emissions, as well as the prime cause of high carbon monoxide levels in urbanareas. Much work is in progress on the use of alternatives to gasoline and diesel. Of thenon-petroleum-based fuels, natural gas, methanol and ethanol are receiving the greatest

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2attention. Longer term possibilities include synthetic gasoline and diesel made from shaleoil or coal, as well as hydrogen [Heywood, 1985].Hydrogen is clean, abundant and accessible, making it a leading contender as analternate fuel.Hydrogen combustion produces no pollution and emits water as opposedto petroleum-based fuels, which emit carbon monoxide. Hydrogen is the most abundantelement in the universe, making it an ideal component of a renewable and sustainablefuture energy system. There are three methods for obtaining hydrogen gas: electrolysisof water, steam reforming of natural gas, and gas separation techniques. Electrolysis useselectricity to separate water into its constituents, hydrogen and oxygen. Due to itsdependency upon electricity, The United States Department of Energy (DOE) hasconcluded that electrolysis is unlikely to become the predominant method for largequantities of hydrogen production in the future. The more predominant method forproducing hydrogen (as a synthesis gas) is steam reforming of natural gas. In addition to hydrogen production methods, hydrogen may also be obtained byseparation from gas mixtures (air). Hydrogen is commonly mixed with other gases,usually inert gasses – such as nitrogen and oxygen. One method of separation is bythermal cycling of materials which are capable of absorbing and desorbing hydrogen.Metal hydrides are metallic or intermetallic compounds that have the ability toreversibly absorb relatively large amounts of hydrogen at ambient temperatures andpressures. Cohen and Wemick [1982] found that for applications such as hydrogenstorage and transport, this ability offers several advantages over traditional hydrogencontainment systems. This technology allows hydrogen to be stored in a solid form. For “example, Snape and Lynch [1980] found that a hydride at room temperature and at2. ——-.—— — -- I

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2atmospheric pressure can store hydrogen at densities 20% to 80% greater than that ofliquid hydrogen at-433 “F. For gas storage to approach these densities, very highpressures and heavy containment vessels are required.In addition, Snape and Lynch [1980] state that the relatively high heat of reaction,up to 40 Btu/(mole H2), also makes metal hydrides attractive for use in heat storage,waste recovery, and heat pumps. Resorption pressures ranging from 0.05 to 60 atm makethem particularly suitable for staged hydrogen compression [Sandrock and Huston,1981]. A pump or compressor utilizing metal hydrides requires no moving parts otherthan valves.Unfortunately, there are several disadvantages associated with metal hydrides.They tend to be very heavy because they are primarily metallic compounds. The cost ofsome of the more attractive hydrides is high, particularly those of Palladium. And, largeamounts of energy are generally required for absorption and resorption, leading topotentially high energy costs. Therefore, optimization of the operation of the metalhydride can reduce excessive energy and material costs.In general, metal hydrides have relatively fast reaction rates, large heats ofreactions, and low thermal conductivities. Consequently, the Iirniting factor in the ratesof absorption and resorption in metal hydrides is the rate at which the heat of reactioncan be supplied to, or removed from, the metal hydride. Therefore, accurate modeling ofthe heat transfer is of prime importance in optimizing the performance of a metal hydridebased system.The Thermal Cycling Absorption Process (TCAP) is a metal hydride based,thermally cycled hydrogen gas separation process invented by Mying W. Lee of the3

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2Savannah River Site. ”The main component of this sep ation process is a shell-and-tubetype heat exchanger utilizing a Palladium deposited on kieselguhr (l?dlk) packed column.Palladium is a metal hydride material which absorbs hydrogen reversibly due to therelatively small size of the hydrogen molecule. The hydrogen gas temperature andpressure controls the direction of the reaction. Kieselguhr, “ahighly porous diatomite, hasa low pressure drop during the gas flow in the packed column and provides a largesurface area for deposition of the Palladium metal. Pure Palladium crumbles into a finepowder after repeated absorption of hydrogen but remains on the small kieselguhrparticles without breaking up once properly deposited. The hydrogen absorptionproperties of Palladium are relatively unaffected after deposit on the kieselguhr.The heat exchanger is constructed of a helically coiled column, which occupies theannular space between an inner and outer shell. Coiled tubes are used to obtain a largerheat transfer area per unit volume. The Pal/k is packed into the pores of copper oraluminum foam with a relatively low void fraction inside the column, which increases thepotential for heat transfer. The packed column occupies the annular space between aninner and outer shell, with nitrogen gas circulating through the annulus. In operation, thecolumn temperature is cycled between a low and high temperature, creating a cycle oftwo distinct steps - an absorption step and a resorption step, which separates hydrogenfrom the inert gasses. For a given column diameter&d length, the throughput isdetermined primarily by the rate at which the column, and thus the Pal/k, can be cycledbetween the two temperatures. Therefore, for effective and efficient separation, the heattransfer aspects of this column are crucial. .4. . . . .v i-. -, . -.?. ,-- .,.,——--- .—.

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2Few measurements and models have been presented which describe the thermalconductivity of metal hydride materials. Suissa, et al. [1984] measured the thermalconductivities of two metal hydrides between 2 and 5 atmospheres (atm). They found.that increasing the hydrogen pressure from 2 to 5 atm increased the effective thermalconductivity by 5%. Similarly, Lin et. al. [1985] measured the thermal conductivity ofiron-titanium alloys, another type of hydride material. They found that packing thepowder in the pores of aluminum foam with a void fraction of 92% increased the thermalconductivity by 40% over that measured for the powder alone. Palladium is a lowpressure metal hydride material, and operates effectively on the order of 1 atm, therefore,the pressure dependency of effective thermal conductivity at higher pressures developedby Suissa, et al. would not apply to’the operation of the Pal/k metal hydride. Also, since “the Pal/k consists of athin metallic layer deposited on a very low conductive material, theexperiments based upon metallic alloy powders performed by Lin et. al. [1985] maybesuspect due to their higher thermal conductivities.In this process, accurately modeling the heat transfer depends greatly on the model’sability to correctly determine the therm conductivity within the packed bed andresultant heat transfer coefficients. In this paper; a model is presented which describesheat transfer in a low pressure, stagnant packed metal hydride based system with andwithout a heat transfer-enhancing medium. The time dependent temperature profilescalculated by the model are compared with the experimental measurements in differentarrangements of hydride material packed beds to determine the ability of the model toaccurately reflect the process.,#5----— . .——-— -——-. .--.

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 21.2 Literature ReviewA thorough literature review was made which focused on three key areas: 1)modeling of nitrogen flow and its heat transfer characteristics in the shell side of theTCAP heat exchange 2) modeling of low flow and heat transfer characteristics in Pal/kpacked column; and 3) modeling of metal foam inclusion in Pal/k packed column.The inlet and outlet sections and internal shell of the TCAP heat exchanger aremodeled as turbulent flow in circular tubes. Dittus and Boelter [1930] proposedconvection correlations to express average Nusselt numbers for fully developed turbulent. flow (Reynolds number 5000) in smoothcircular tubes. Incropera [1990] states thatthese correlations can also be evaluated by using the hydraulic diameter. These“correlations were formulated through experimentation and hold today as extensions ofReynolds’ [1901] original fluid flow experiments.For the shell side annulus of the heat exchanger containing the helical packedcolumn, an empirical correlation for a bank of tubes in crossflow can be used. The heattransfer coefficient between the hot and cold nitrogen and the column wall is dependentupon the mass flow rate. Colburn [1933] recommended a dimensionless equation forgases flowing normal to banks of unbaffled in-line tubes. This correlation was basedupon the data for air available in the 1930s and was limited to the use of ten longitudinalrows of coils. It was not until 1952 that Kays and Lo [1952] provided correction factorsfor Colbum’s correlation that compensated for tube banks consisting of less than tenlongitudinal rows. Still, some of the earlier work by Grirnison [1937, 1938] is in popularuse today. Grimison was the first to actively pursue a correlation for the average heat6

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2transfer coefficient for the entire tube bank based on the configuration differences, andcorrection for number of rows for Reynolds numbers of up to 40,000.Further investigation of flow pasta single tube, and its heat transfer facilitated the.understanding of the physical phenomenon of heat transfer in banks of tubes in crossflow.Several books pertaining to heat exchanger design were published, including Keys andLondon [1958]. However, these books dealt only with flows of gases at low Reynoldsnumbers. More recently accelerated development of science and technology has revealed,new challenges in the field of heat transfer of tubes in crossflow. Zukauskas [1972]recognized this need for more reliable formulas and provided them for calculation of heattransfer of tubes in flows of gases at higher Reynolds numbers than previouslydeveloped. Using extensive experimental data, Zukauskas [1972] developed correlationsfor heat transfer for tubes in cross flow in the range of I?randtl number from 0.7 to 500and that of Reynolds number from 1 to 2X10G. Because of the more extensive researchperformed and documented by Zukauskas, his methods will be used in this study.The heat transfer within the packed column is more difficult to model. The searchwas first directed towards Nusselt number correlations for packed beds. The presence ofthe Pal/k modifies the column wall heat transfer to the extent that correlations for the flowthrough an empty tube are not applicable. Whitaker [1972] correlated data for heatItransfer from gases to different kinds of packing from several sources. The types ofpacking included spheres - which models the Pal/k packing - but the correlation is validonly for Reynolds numbers from 20 to 104,which is inappropriate for this application ofvery low Reynolds number (0.06). Upadhyay [1975] used the mass transfer analogy tostudy heat and mass transfer in packed beds at Reynolds numbers from 0.01 to 10, andI.7-,mT7n-,1

WSRC-TR-99-O0348, Rev. 2developed a Nusselt number correlation. The range of void fraction tested by Upadhyaywas fairly narrow (0.371 to 0.451) and data were for solid cylindrical pellets in wateronly. Use of this correlation for gases will lead to high uncertainty. Beek [1962] provided.a more specialized equation to calculate the”heat transfer from the wall of a packed bed toa gas, but the result is only valid for Reynolds numbers of 40 to 2000.With the lack of available Nussek number correlations for heat transfercoefficient in this particular arrangement, the literature review was redirected towardsfinding the effective thermal conductivity within the packed bed. The axial effectivethermal conductivity was first examined, and was found to be negligible due to the lowReynolds number flow and the lack of an axial temperature gradient in the packedcolumn. When the radial conductivity is taken into account, the Legawiec andZiolkowski [1996] correlation provides an axial effective thermal conductivity only onepercent of that of the hydrogen thermal conductivity in the column. Rayleigh [1892]made an early attempt to find the effective thermal conductivity of a two-phase mediumfor a cubical array of uniform spheres. This model is rigid and artificial and does notallow for the random packing which is encountered in reality. Russell [1935] proposed aless stringent correlation for the effective thermal conductivity of packed cubes, but thiscorrelation does not give good experimental correlation when gas is the continuousmedium, as in a packed bed. Laubitz [1959] introduced a correction to Russell’scorrelation to account for the gas in continuous phase. However, the experiments andtheir conclusion are based upon cubical shaped powders and would be inappropriate forthis application of spherical Pal/k particles. Hadly. [1986] presented the results of anexperimental and analytical investigation, which dealt with the effective thermal,8WT-,-- . . . , .,.,;. ,,e,,.,- .,3,. ,. . .ti.x-.,,. .-,. ., . . . . . . .’ ----.’,-.? .%-.,- z? ’.—.,,.-.rp-:—z-------

WSRC-TR-99-00348, Rev. 2conductivity of packed metal powders. The resultant correlation was based on ananalytical technique that used very small void fractions and would not apply for the Pal/kcase.Ofuchi and Kunii [1964] studied packed beds with larger void fractions (.34 to .6)and stagnant fluids, (Reynolds number 0). Their studies with fluid flows approachingReynolds numbers of zero compared closely with the theoretical equation of stagnantconductivities found by Kunii and Smith [1960]. Due to the higher void fractions usedand their dependence on Reynolds numbers approaching zero- Kunii and Smith’scorrelation for effective thermal conductivity in the bed presented by Ofuchi and Kunii[1964] will be used. Yagi and Kunii [1960, 1962] provide a correlation for finding theheat transfer coe”fflcientat the wall for Reynolds number approaching zero. Ofuchi andKunii [1964] provide this calculated heat transfer coefficient as a correction term when.-the effective thermal conductivity is assumed to be constant throughout the bed. Thecorrelations provided by Ofuchi and Kunii will be used to calculate the effective thermalconductivity as well as the heat transfer coefficient of the Pal/k packed column.Heat transfer in packed beds result from contributions of conduction, convection,and radiation. Yovonovich [1967] states the contribution to the total heat transfer fr

Gravitational constant, 32.17 ft.lb/lbf.s2 Heat transfer coefficient, Btu/h ft2.0F Convective heat transfer coefficient, Btuh ft2”0F Thermal contact conductance, Btu/hr. ft2.0F Nitrogen side heat transfer coefficients, Btuh ft2.0F Pd/kpacked column side heat transfer coefficient, Btu/h ft2.0F

Related Documents:

Basic Heat and Mass Transfer complements Heat Transfer,whichispublished concurrently. Basic Heat and Mass Transfer was developed by omitting some of the more advanced heat transfer material fromHeat Transfer and adding a chapter on mass transfer. As a result, Basic Heat and Mass Transfer contains the following chapters and appendixes: 1.

Feature Nodes for the Heat Transfer in Solids and Fluids Interface . . . 331 The Heat Transfer in Porous Media Interface 332 Feature Nodes for the Heat Transfer in Porous Media Interface . . . . 334 The Heat Transfer in Building Materials Interface 338 Settings for the Heat Transfer in Building Materials Interface . . . . . 338

Both temperature and heat transfer can change with spatial locations, but not with time Steady energy balance (first law of thermodynamics) means that heat in plus heat generated equals heat out 8 Rectangular Steady Conduction Figure 2-63 from Çengel, Heat and Mass Transfer Figure 3-2 from Çengel, Heat and Mass Transfer The heat .

Holman / Heat Transfer, 10th Edition Heat transfer is thermal energy transfer that is induced by a temperature difference (or gradient) Modes of heat transfer Conduction heat transfer: Occurs when a temperature gradient exists through a solid or a stationary fluid (liquid or gas). Convection heat transfer: Occurs within a moving fluid, or

Young I. Cho Principles of Heat Transfer Kreith 7th Solutions Manual rar Torrent Principles.of.Heat.Transfer.Kreith.7th.Sol utions.Manual.rar (Size: 10.34 MB) (Files: 1). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 7th Edition - Incropera pdf. Principles of Heat Transfer_7th Ed._Frank Kreith, Raj M. Manglik Principles of Heat Transfer. 7th Edition

1 INTRODUCTION TO HEAT TRANSFER AND MASS TRANSFER 1.1 HEAT FLOWS AND HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS 1.1.1 HEAT FLOW A typical problem in heat transfer is the following: consider a body “A” that e

J. P. Holman, “Heat Transfer . Heat transfer (or heat) is thermal energy in transit due to a spatial temperature difference. Whenever a temperature difference exists in a medium or between media, heat transfer must occur. As shown in Figure 1.1, we refer to different types of heat transfer processes as

3 . heat transfer from the cylinder to contents . 9 3.1 heat transfer to the solid uf, bulk . 9 3.2 heat transfer to the overflowing uf, liquid . 13 3.3 heat transfer to the uf, vapor . 14 4 . heat trans