Regulatory Basis Of Environmental Impact Assessment .

1y ago
10 Views
2 Downloads
648.65 KB
46 Pages
Last View : 16d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Bria Koontz
Transcription

COMPANY:DOCUMENT :AGIP KCOPROJECT:KASHAGAN FIELD EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME FACILITIES CONSTRUCTIONCONTRACTOR:KAZAKH AGENCY OF APPLIED ECOLOGYCONTRACT :AGIP KCO/2002-0628REGULATORY BASIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTCURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL STATUSMETHODOLOGICAL ASPECTSOF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTMETHODOLOGICAL ASPECTSOF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTDIRECTORDOC :Freiberg A.B.signPROJECTMANAGEREidinov Y.I.Kazakh Agency of Applied Ecologysign10a Abay ave. 8th fl. Almaty Kazakhstan 480013Tel.: 7 3272 671 122 Fax: 7 3272 728 794E-mail: office@kape.kz http://www.kape.kzISSUED:For review and comment by Agip KCODATE:2004STAGE:FINAL

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmentaland Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentEXECUTIVE LISTPART ISkolsky V.А.Namyatov А.A.Uvarov V.N.General DirectorSenior SpecialistHead of GIS and Database DepartmentRudenko I.M.PART IIHead of Socio-Economic Issues and Legislation Analysis Department(Introduction, Sections 1-6 of the Methodology)Vassilevskaya T.P. Key Specialist of Socio-Economic Issues and Legislation AnalysisDepartment (participation in preparing Sections 1-6 of the Methodology)Mariposa Company (?) – Section 7 of the MethodologyReport issue:Trussevich D.Y. Head of Reports Issue SectorLudannaya Y.А. Key Specialist of Reports Issue SectorSabirova А.R.Key Specialist of Reports Issue SectorReviewer:Temis L.Executive ListHead of Environment, HSE Department, Agip KCOPage 2

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmentaland Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentINTRODUCTIONThis document presents the methodological approaches to impact assessment used during thedevelopment of Environmental Impact Assessments for the Kashagan Field DevelopmentExperimental Programme. The following impact methodologies are presented: Part I. Methodological aspects of environmental impact assessment. Part II. Methodological aspects of socio-economic impact assessment.For a long time in the Republic of Kazakhstan the assessment of anticipated environmentalimpact from a project has concentrated on the environmental components, such as:atmospheric air, water and ground resources, vegetation and fauna, etc. To a great extent, suchposition was determined by the fact that analysis and assessment of socio-economic impactswere not supported by appropriate rules and standards in the national legislative base. At thesame time, it is clear that a full environmental assessment should consider the social andeconomic consequences of any anticipated activity, as well as consequences of an impact onthe natural environment.An attempt has been made for the first time to harmonise the approaches both in terms of adomestic assessment and with regard to international best practice.The methodology presented for impact assessment is based on the definition of the followingthree parameters: Scale of spatial impact; Scale of temporal impact; Impact intensity.Each parameter is rated according to a given scale with appropriate criteria that have beendeveloped and presented for each gradation.The semi-quantitative method of impact assessment described in this document is based onthe experience of KAAE specialists, research specialists of the Republic of Kazakhstan andwork experience of Agip KCO, ADL, ERM, Shell and other companies.Both documents are likely to be reviewed and possibly modified in the near future since theyare considered as live working documents. In this connection, the authors will accept withgratitude all comments and proposals aimed at improvement of the methodologies presented.IntroductionPage 3

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmentaland Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentTABLE OF CONTENTPART IMETHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTEXECUTIVE LIST . 2INTRODUCTION . 3TABLE OF CONTENT . 4INTRODUCTION . 81GENERAL PROVISIONS. 92TERMS AND DEFINITIONS . 103ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE . 134ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY. 144.1Mitigation of Impacts . 144.2Residual Impact . 155EVALUATION OF IMPACTS. 165.1Severity Criteria. 165.2Definition of Spatial Scale for Environmental Impacts . 175.3Definition of Temporal Scale for Environmental Impacts. 175.4Definition of Intensity (Value/Magnitude) Scale for Environmental Impacts . 185.5Integrated Assessment of Impact from Various Impact Sources upon ParticularEnvironmental Components. 186EMERGENCY SITUATIONS IMPACT ASSESSMENT (RISK ANALYSIS) . 206.1Hazardous Industrial Processes Definition (Screening) . 206.2Risk Assessment (QRA) . 206.2.1Definition of Emergency Situations Possibility (Frequency) . 216.2.2Assessment of Emergency Situations Consequences . 216.3Suggestions on Risk Elimination or Decrease of Risk . 217Environmental Risk Matrix . 238ASSESSMENT OF CUMULATIVE IMPACT AND DIFFERENT IMPACTS. 258.1Cumulative Impacts Assessment . 258.2Assessment of Different Impact Sources Interaction. 269TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS . 2710SUMMARY . 28REFERENCES . 29PART IIMETHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTINTRODUCTION . 331GENERAL PROVISIONS. 342METHODOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTSECTION DEVELOPMENT . 353TERMS AND DEFINITIONS . 36Table of ContentPage 4

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmentaland Socio-Economic Impact Assessment4SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE . 375SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PLANNED ACTIVITY . 385.1Socio-Economic Impact Assessment Stages . 385.2Identification of socio-economic components to be reviewed during impact assessment(Scoping) . 385.3Screening of Planned Activity’s Potential Impacts upon the Socio-Economic Sphere . 395.4Measures to Mitigate Impacts . 395.5.Assessment of Residual Impacts’ Significance. Impact Value Criteria. Impact Probability . 396INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT of IMPACT on certain socio-economic components . 417IMPACT ASSESSMENT under EMERGENCY SITUATIONS. 427.1Hazard Identification (Screening) and Risk Assessment. 427.2Assessment of Socio-Economic Emergencies’ Consequences . 427.3Preventing and Mitigating Emergencies’ Consequences . 43REFERENCE LIST. 45APPENDICESAppendix 1 Categories of environmental assessment level (for screening)Appendix 2 Criteria for determining impact intensityCriteria for determining physical impact factorsAppendix 4 Criteria to determine the spatial impact of planned activity upon the socioeconomic environment during emergency situationsAppendix 5 Criteria to determine the temporal impact of planned activity upon the socioeconomic environment during emergency situationsAppendix 6 Criteria to determine the impact magnitude of planned activity upon the socioeconomic environment during emergency situationsTable of ContentPage 5

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmentaland Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentLIST OF TABLESPART ITable 4-1Residual impact . 15Table 5-1Spatial (area) gradations of environmental impacts . 17Table 5-2Gradation of temporal impact assessment. 17Table 5-3Intensity scale gradation for environmental impacts . 18Table 5-4Categories of impact severity. 18Table 5-5An example of the integrated assessment. 19Table 6-1Classification of environmental safety conditions . 21PART IITable 5.2-1 Socio-economic parameters to be used for impact assessment . 38Table 5.5-1 Spatial scale gradations of socio-economic impacts. 40Table 5.5-2 Temporal scale gradations of socio-economic impacts . 40Table 5.5-3 Magnitude scale gradations of socio-economic impacts. 40LIST OF FIGURESPART IFigure 4.1Generalised Scheme for Environmental Impact Assessment . 14Figure 7.1Ecological risk matrix. 24PART IIFigure 5.1.1 Step-by-step scheme of impact analysis for socio-economic impact assessment 38Table of ContentPage 6

COMPANY:CONTRACT :AGIP KCOPROJECT:KASHAGAN FIELD EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM FACILITIES CONSTRUCTIONCONTRACTOR:CONTRACT :KAZAKH AGENCY OF APPLIED ECOLOGYAGIP KCO/2002-0628PART IMETHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTRESUMEThe given document describesmethodological approaches to theenvironmental impact assessmentused in the EIA.

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmental and Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentPart I. Methodological Aspects of Environmental Impact AssessmentINTRODUCTIONThe procedure of impact assessment approved in Kazakhstan is determined according to therequirements of the RoK Law “On Ecological Expert Review” and the “Interim Instruction onthe Procedure of Environmental Impact Assessment of Planned Economic Activity (EIA) inthe Republic of Kazakhstan”, RND 03.02.01-93, Almaty, 1993.This document describes the methodological approaches to the assessment of environmentalimpact. The semi-quantitative method of impact assessment described in this document isbased on the experience of KAAE specialists, research specialists of the Republic ofKazakhstan and of Agip KCO, Arthur D Little Limited, ERM, and other companies.IntroductionPage 8

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmental and Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentPart I. Methodological Aspects of Environmental Impact Assessment GENERAL PROVISIONSThe assessment methodology is executed within the framework of the integrated volume«Methodology» of the EIA for the Kashagan Field Development Experimental Program.The document determines the structure, contents and procedure of «Environmental ImpactAssessment of Planned Activity» with due account of the following: Environmental impact assessment of planned activity during routine operation; Environmental impact assessment of planned activity during abnormal (emergency)operation.If necessary, the assessment of trans-boundary impact of the facilities located in the Republicof Kazakhstan upon the environmental aspects must be executed on the basis of interstateagreement with consideration of provisions from the "Convention on Environmental ImpactAssessment in Trans-boundary Context", ESPO (Finland), 1991 which Kazakhstan has joinedin October, 21, 2000.While preparing the given methodology, documents relating to Environmental Assessmentand Environmental Impact Assessment from the Republic of Kazakhstan and otherinternational organisations have been used as guidelines and are referenced accordingly.Chapter 1General ProvisionsPage 9

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmental and Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentPart I. Methodological Aspects of Environmental Impact Assessment TERMS AND DEFINITIONSAcceptable risk of emergency – a risk, the level of which is accepted and justified basing onthe social-economic reasons. The object operation risk can be considered as acceptable, if thesociety is ready to take a risk for the sake of the benefit obtained due to object operation.Anthropogenic load - the degree of direct and indirect impact caused by human beings andtheir activity upon natural complexes and separate components of the environment.Comfortable living conditions – the characteristics of the environment promoting to goodhealth status of human beings and favourable social conditions of population living.Cumulative impact – impacts resulting from the permanently increasing impact caused in itsturn by the other former, present of sound predictable operations associated with projectrealization.Determining of information content and quantity – a process of determining of contentand quantity of information on the environment status to be provided to competent authoritieswithin the framework of the EIA procedure.Ecological justification - cumulative arguments (evidence) and scientific predictionsallowing to assess the environmental hazards of the planned economic and other activities forecosystems (natural territorial complexes) and human beings.Ecological standard – the specific value of nature resource use or technogenic impact uponecosystems and tits separate components, following which functional-structural characteristicsof ecosystems do not fall outside the limits of the natural changes.EIA document – is a document or documents containing information about EP and EIAneeded in compliance with Article 5 Directive 85/337/ЕЕС with amendments made byDirective 97/11/ЕС.EIA group - a group carrying out an assessment of the impact upon the environment andpreparing information for EP and EIA for further commit to competent authorities.Emergency damage — losses in the production and other spheres of the man vital activity,damage to the natural environment caused as a result of emergency situation at the hazardproduction object as well as losses equivalent in money .Emergency hazard – the risk, the possible damage to a man, property and (or) theenvironment due to emergency situation at the hazard production object. Emergencies hazardat hazard production objects relate to possibility of facilities and(or) technical devicesdestruction, explosion and(or) hazardous substance emission with further damage to a man,property, and (or) the natural environment.Emergency risk analysis – a process of risks identification and emergency risk assessment atthe production object being hazard for some persons or groups of persons, property or theenvironment.Emergency risk assessment – the process used for determining of probability (or frequency)and degree of the severity of the emergency risks consequences for population health,property and/or the environment. Risk assessment includes the analysis of probability (orfrequency), analysis of consequences and their combination.Environment Action Plan (EAP) – a document containing: a) measures to be taken in thecourse of project implementation and operation to eliminate or neutralize the unfavourableconsequences for the environment or their reduction to the acceptable level; and b) provisionsrequired for the given measures implementation.Environment components - constituent parts of ecosystems: air, surface and ground waters,subsoils (including grounds, rocks), soils, plants and animals.Environmental hazard - the possibility of worsening of the natural environment quality(status, processes), under the influence of natural and technogenic factors posing the threat toecosystems and a man.Chapter 2Terms and DefinitionsPage 10

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmental and Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentPart I. Methodological Aspects of Environmental Impact AssessmentEnvironmental impact - any change of physical, natural or cultural environment resultedfrom the project development.Environmental Impact Assessment - the forecast of anticipated consequences resulting fromthe ongoing or planned activity and their management through project development, as wellas mitigation and rehabilitation measures so that any negative consequences can beminimised.Environmental impact assessment - determining of the nature, degree and the scale of theimpact caused by the object of the economic or other activity upon the environment andconsequences of this impact, as well as development of proper measures on impact mitigation,management and monitoring. This is the term used in the given document for the specificationof procedure meeting the requirements of the assessment in compliance with Directive97/11/ЕС.Environmental requirements – the complex of nature use limits and conditions on theenvironment protection in the process of the economic or other activity.Environmental risk - a combination of probability or frequency of certain hazard occurrenceand severity of consequences resulted from such event.Environmental safety - the state of the environment providing the environmental balance innature and protection of the environment and human beings from the hazard impact of theunfavourable factors resulted from the natural processes and anthropogenic impact, includingtechnogenic (industry, construction) and agricultural ones.Environmental situation – combination of conditions, processes and circumstances ofnatural and technical nature influencing the status of natural and natural-technique systems.Environmental survey – surveys, carrying out by the developer and EIA team forpreparation of information about the environment to be provided to competent authorities.Identification of emergency hazards – the process of defining and admitting of fact thatemergency hazards at the hazard production object exist; the process of risks characteristicsdetermining.Impacts interaction – reactions between the different impact types (either between theimpacts of one project only or between impacts of other projects in the same sphere)Indirect impact - Environmental impacts that result not directly (immediately) from projectrealization, frequently occur at some distance from project realization area or come out fromcomplex impact. In some cases this type of impact may be referred to the second or thirdimpact level and can also be reviewed as a secondary (side) impact.Information about the environment (ecological information) - information about the Projectand impacts upon the environment, provided to competent authorities by the projectdeveloper. The requirements to such kind of information are given in Article 5 and AppendixIV of the Directive (see Environmental Impact Assessment).Monitoring of natural-technique systems - the system of stationary observations over theenvironment and facilities in the process of their construction, operation, decommissioning aswell as development of recommendation on normalization of the ecological situation andengineering protection of facilities.Natural-resource potential of the territory - a number of natural resources and conditionsdetermining the limit of the possible use of the natural environment components withconsideration of their capability for restoration; the characteristic reflecting the degree of thenatural environment components participation in the satisfying of various needs of thesociety.Natural-territorial complex - genetically conditioned combination of natural componentsforming the system of the physical-geographical formations of various hierarchic ranks.Object of environmental risk - an object of economic or other activity resulting in an impactupon the environment of high severity and long duration and posing a threat to the life andhealth of population.Chapter 2Terms and DefinitionsPage 11

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmental and Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentPart I. Methodological Aspects of Environmental Impact AssessmentProject – carrying out of construction operations or other installation works accompanying bythe ingress into the environment and landscape, including operations related to the mineralresources production.Resistance of the natural systems to the impact – the capability of natural systems forpreserving their structure and functional properties in the course of the natural andanthropogenic impact.Risk management - the process of the implementation of the decision concerning theaccepting or changing of risks, based on the assessment of various expense and benefits.Screening- the process of making of the decision concerning the necessity of the EIAprocedure for the certain project.Transboundary impact – an impact resulted by the objects of the economic or other activityof one state upon the environmental status of the territory of another state.Zone of ecological disorder - the section of the area subject to pervasive irreversible changesof the environment caused from economic or other activity and resulting in considerableworsening of the population health, biological balance disturbance, natural environmentalsystem disturbance, flora and fauna degradation.Zone of environmental emergency - the section of the area subject to stable negativechanges in the environment resulted from economic or other activity threatening the health ofpopulation, status of the natural environmental systems, genetic heritage of plants andanimals1.Zone of project impact - the area subject to project influence, including such its subsidiaryaspects, as trunk routes of electric power lines, pipelines, channels, tunnels, transport andaccess roads, zones of wastes collection and disposal, temporary workers’ camps, as well asunplanned operations related to project implementation (spontaneous populating, timberfelling, shifting agriculture along the access roads).Chapter 2Terms and DefinitionsPage 12

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmental and Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentPart I. Methodological Aspects of Environmental Impact Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCEDUREThe section «Environmental impact assessment» is an obligatory component of the overallenvironmental impact assessment.Environmental impact assessment of planned activity is made with application of availablematerials and statistical data obtained from: Ministry of Environment and Bioresources of the RoK and its oblast committees; Subdivision “Kazgidromet” RSE; Scientific and Research organisations; Other organisations.Chapter 3Environmental Impact Assessment ProcedurePage 13

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmental and Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentPart I. Methodological Aspects of Environmental Impact Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGYThe generalized scheme for environmental impact assessment is shown in Fig 4.1 below:Impact definitionImpact mitigationAssessment of severity of residual impactsFigure 4.1Generalised Scheme for Environmental Impact AssessmentThe assessment of the potential impacts of the project upon the environment is the mostimportant stage in the EIA process. The objective is to define what environmental changesmay result from the proposed activities and assess the severity of such changes.This assessment is based on the following: Project technical description; Understanding of the environmental components that may be affected; Experience from other projects.In compliance with usual EIA practice this impact assessment is conducted for the followingecosystem components: Soil and subsoil; Surface and marine waters; Groundwater resources; Marine sediments; Air quality; Biological resources; Landscapes and visual impacts; Physical factor of impact (noise and electromagnetic impact, vibration, etc.).a. Mitigation of ImpactsGenerally the measures and provisions undertaken for impact mitigation have beenestablished during the design of the project through the hierarchy described in Text Box 1below.Text Box 1: Mitigation Hierarchy for Planned Project Activities Avoid at source; Reduce at sourceAvoiding or reducing at source is essentially “designing” the project so that a feature causing an impact is designed out(e.g. pipeline route changes) or altered (e.g. reduced working width). Often called minimization. In-situ mitigationThis proposes modifications to the initial project design. e.g. pollution control measures. Often called “in-end-of-pipe”. Mitigation at receptorIf the impact cannot be abated on –site then measures can be implemented off-site e.g. install double-glazed windows tominimize noise impact at nearby residences Chapter 4Repair or RestorationEnvironmental Impact Assessment MethodologyPage 14

Volume 3. Methodological Aspects of Environmental and Socio-Economic Impact AssessmentPart I. Methodological Aspects of Environmental Impact AssessmentSome impacts result in unavoidable damage of resources (e.g. damage of agricultural lands during pipelineconstruction). Restoration mainly proposes measures for returning the resource to its initial state. CompensationIf other mitigation measures are not possible or fully effective, then compensation for the loss, damage and the generalintrusion may be appropriate. The compensation may be “in-kind”, such as planting of new woodlands elsewhere toreplace what has been lost.The consequences of the impact after mitigation measures are implemented is called theresidual impact.b. Residual ImpactInitially RoK experts and KAAE specialists will provide a qualitative review of the potentialimpact severity. Then taking into account impact mitigation measures to be implemented theresidual impact will be assessed. An example of such an assessment is given in Table 4-1. Inaddition the type of the impact, direct or indirect, will be specified in line with the definitionsshown in Text Box 2.Residual impacts are described by RoK experts and KAAE specialists based on theirexperience of similar projects. The category of severity will then be assessed following thesemi-quantitative methodology described below and compared with the initial qualitative .The severity assessment for residual impacts is important for the following reasons: To demonstrate to design engineers the necessity for appropriate mitigation measures for anypotential impact. To inform decision making authorities, and interested parties about the residual impacts.Table 4-1Residual impactInitial Impact description,Severity (High, Medium, Low),Type of Impact (direct, indirect)Impact mitigation measuresImpactdescriptionImpact of Trunklines on benthos.Benthos may be disturbed or maydie during dredging operationsSeverity - highType of impact - directTo minimize the size of thepipeline construction corridorResidualimpacton benthosResidual impactSeverity per environmentalcomponents (High, Medium,Low), typeSeverity - mediumText Box 2Direct impact – an impact directly related to operations on project implementation and being the result of the interaction between theworking operation and the receiving environment (for example, between the sewage water discharge and the quality of the water receptor)Indirect impact – an impact related to the mediated changes of the environment being the result of other developments or workingoperations, stimulated by the initial development.Chap

REGULATORY BASIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT . Vassilevskaya T.P. Key Specialist of Socio-Economic Issues and Legislation Analysis Department (participation in preparing Sections 1-6 of the Methodology) Mariposa Company .

Related Documents:

A formal Regulatory Management System [RMS] can help with: reduction of regulatory burden on citizens and firms improvement of regulatory quality identification of best choice of policy options Comprised of four elements: 1. regulatory quality tools 2. regulatory processes 3. regulatory institutions 4. regulatory policies 16

Page 1 of 9 Rapid Regulatory Courses in HealthStream Getting Started Tip Sheet Please note: Everyone is required to take two compliance trainings titled: Rapid Regulatory Compliance: Non-clinical I Rapid Regulatory Compliance: Non-clinical II Depending on your position at CHA, you may have more courses on your list. One must complete them all.File Size: 1MBPage Count: 9Explore furtherRapid Regulatory Compliance: Clinical II - KnowledgeQ .quizlet.comRapid Regulatory Compliance: Clinical I - An HCCS .quizlet.comRapid Regulatory Compliance: Non-clinical II-KnowledgeQ .quizlet.comThe Provider Compliance Tip fact sheets are now available .www.cms.govRapid Regulatory Compliance - Non-Clinical - Part Istudyres.comRecommended to you b

Key words: regulation, regulatory quality, regulatory burden, regulatory management system, regulatory impact analysis, regulatory impact statement, cost of doing business . P a g e 792 . competitiveness, erodes public trust in government and encourages corruption in public institutions and public processes [OECD 2010].

Environmental Impact Statements (EIS’s) Small proportion of federal actions require an Environmental Impact Statement EIS’s Environmental Assessments (EA’s) (Initial Environmental Impact Assessment) About 50,000 annually (Environmental Impact Assessment) About 5-600 annually EAs 7 Categorical ExclusionsCategorical Exclusions

environmental impact assessment, land use planning, pollution and climate change, environmental education, environmental law and policy, environmental engineering, and environmental design. As such, the volume will be useful to anyone interested in solutions to today's turbulent environmental situation.

CEMP Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan DEAT Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism DME Department of Minerals and Energy DWAF Department of Water Affairs and Forestry ECA Environment Conservation Act (No. 73 of 1989) EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIR Environmental Impact Report EMP Environmental Management Plan

A. (2005). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment (3rd Ed), pp 125-155. [4] International Environmental Law and Policy Consultant with the Canadian Institute for Environmental, Law and Policy-CIELAP. [5] Jay, S. Jones, C. Slinn, P. and Wood, C. (2007). Environmental Impact Assessment: Retrospect and prospect.

Rules and Regulations of Internet Banking Terms and Conditions governing the Internet Banking Service of ICICI Bank UK 1. Definitions: In this document the following words and phrases shall have the meanings as set below unless the context indicates otherwise: "Account(s)" refers to the user's current account, savings account, term deposit account, credit card account, home loan account .