Producer Mobility Support For Information Centric Networking Approaches .

1y ago
5 Views
2 Downloads
647.43 KB
9 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Brenna Zink
Transcription

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 6 (2018) pp. 3272-3280 Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.comProducer Mobility Support for Information Centric NetworkingApproaches: A ReviewMuktar Hussaini1, Shahrudin Awang Nor2, Amran Ahmad3InterNetWorks Research Laboratory, School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia.Sintok, Kedah, MalaysiaORCID1: 0000-0002-4492-0365AbstractThe mobility support for Information Centric Networking(ICN) was generally divided into three categories, theconsumer mobility, producer mobility and network mobility.Producer mobility is the support for the mobile contentprovider, source or producer to relocate without disruptingcontent consumer and intermediate router for content nameand its location. ICN is naturally supporting mobile consumerand provides some benefits to facilitate network efficiency andtimely delivery of information to the users on mobile. Thispaper reviews an analysis of producer mobility support insome popular ICN approaches and summarizes some of itsfeatures, which provide support during mobility. In addition, abrief comparison between IP mobility and ICN mobilitysupport were discuss and challenges were emphasizedespecially for NDN and CCN that doesn’t support contentproducer mobility initially from their architectural design.Moreover, this review paper highlights on the mechanismsthat facilitate the support of content produce in someapproaches that can be used for the solution of otherapproaches.Keyword: Content-centric architecture, producer mobilitysupport, name-based rosolution, information centricnetworkingINTRODUCTIONThe global mobile data traffic, multimedia traffic, voice andvideo data, real-time streaming, web pages, global networkconnectivity demands is highly increasing. Because of thenumber of Internet users’ flourishes in daily basis, resulted toan ever-increasing demand for Internet support to meet theusers’ requirements and applications' needs. However, becauseof highly demand for data and services over the Internet, a lotof Internet problems were raises, such as: (i) scalability andefficiency of content distribution (ii) does not adequatelysupport node mobility, multi-homing and multicasting (iii)data availability, security and authentication were anotherimportant issue (iv) does not provides better cachingcapabilities, (v) cause an unnecessary bandwidth usage (vi)persistent and location independent naming. In addition, thecurrent Internet architectural technology TCP/IP based beenused, turned out to be inefficient with adequate optimizationof bandwidth when frequent congestion occurs, could notaccommodate the multidimensional needs of data andinformation from the users. Furthermore, the problems ofcurrent Internet architecture are consequences naturallyestablished from its architectural designed some years ago toaddress the sharing of resources [1], [2] and long distancecommunication [3].CDN technology emerged to support the current Internet forscalable and efficient content distribution, as an effectiveapproach that improve the quality of service [4] and P2Ptechnology overlay to support the Internet [5]–[7]. A CDN isthe assemblage of servers placed and distributed over anetwork, with the determined goal of reducing basic networkload and improving performance of applications, by fetchingpredominant content immediate to the user or clients thatrequested it [7].CDN provides server’s load balance as static content servedfrom EC servers nearest to the client certainly decreases thebandwidth required and provides rapid delivery of contentacross geo-locational server. Despite the apparent and efficientbenefits of deploying CDN, there are some potentialshortcomings. However, CDN demands supplementary andpersistent DNS lookup, as static content may be served fromavailable sources and provides potential security vulnerability,as content can be cached or distributed among the servers.Also, the overlay network frequently complicated the overallnetwork management and provides difficulties for applicationdevelopment [6]. In addition, as the number of user accessesdramatically increases, CDN servers must have capability tohandle large amount of content when dealing with flashcrowds which resulted to high cost of management [8].Consequently, the Information-Centric Networking (ICN)paradigm was proposed as a clean-slate redesign tosupplement and replace current host-centric Internetarchitecture, evolves to access the data independent from itslocation by replacing IP addresses with content named tosolve the problems of CDN and P2P as well as the currentInternet in general. Xylomenos, et al. [3] in his surveyedarticle for information centric networking research,highlighted that, users were Interested mainly in accessing thedata and other services such as, mobility support and bettersecurity, has directed many researchers into extremeconsideration for essencial change of Internet architecture.Further, Information Centric Networking paradigm wasoffered to support more benefit such as network performanceand scalability, any-casting and multicasting, authenticity anddata integrity, mobility and multi-homing, in-network cachingand reduction of network resources. Similarly by the nature ofdesign in terms of security, ICN approach provides mobilitysupport and security incorporation to manage and preservesprivacy for both consumers and producers’ locations [9]. Inaddition, some ICN architecture by default provides flowcontrol through hop-to-hop request and reply mechanism;3272

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 6 (2018) pp. 3272-3280 Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.comeven though, there are many challenges such as, scalability,privacy, mobility, application design, legal issues anddeployment that needs more attention and proper solution forthe ICN to be deployed and used extensively [10]. In general,ICN can also be called with terms like data-centric, contentcentric, information-centric, content-aware and data-orientednetworking, depending on the approach under broad area ofICN. Moreover, the ICN architectures are prominently knownwith content name in place of IP address and they arecategorized in to flat, hierarchical and hybrid naming [10].PRODUCER MOBILITYARCHITECTURESUPPORTFORICNMobility support allows mobile devices to relocate betweendifferent access point without disrupting the contentavailability and minimal hand-off delay. Hence, the mobilitywas divided into consumer, producer and network mobility[11]. Producer mobility is the support for the content providerto relocate without disrupting consumers and intermediaterouters for content availability and its location within minimalhand-off time [11]. Figure 1 show data exchange betweenmobile producer and consumer before moving. In this section,we provide a review on some of the fundamental ICNarchitectures.DONA used named-based routing using FIND rule andcontent catching to support information centric architecture.RHs are structured in the form of tree topology thatsymbolizes the BGP topology of the network and each clientknows the whereabouts of its local RH [12], [13]. Any clientauthorized to provide a data or service with name P:L send apacket command REGISTER (P:L) to its local RH. Afterregistration of the content or service, the consumer can sendFIND request for the content to the connected RH. Uponrecipient of the command, if such type of records exists, it willreply to the consumer, otherwise, forward it onward to nextRH. Each RH reserves a registration table that maintained nexthope information and distance to the copy. When a FIND(P:L) reaches RH and there was no records in the registrationtable, the FIND is forward to its parent RH up the tree untilthe source discovered. The content or data exchange occurdirectly from the source to destination using IP routing andforwarding, unless if there is cached copy along the RHs, thedata exchange would be in the reversal through the RHs.The content registration nature of DONA based onREGISTER and UNREGISTER is the mechanism responsiblefor providing mobility support to end system. When themobile producer move from one PoA to another, the processof REGISTER will take place, once the register have beenestablished and published all FIND packets will be forwardedto the new location [14]. Therefore, DONA support consumermobilty by changing the RH and producer mobility would nothave much challenges, because the content producer cansmply re-register its content with the new RH whereby thenew Interest need to be re-send or continue through amechanism similar to Mobile-IP [13], [15].TRIAD as the basic of content-centric architecture providesmobility support like DONA. Mobility support in TRIAD [16]was provided when hosts moves to new location the transportconnection continue to function, although their address maychange. The mobile host gets a temporary name from the newnetwork and registers the temporary name with both home andguest network. The network can simply rebind the transportconnection, based on name identification and the mobile hostcan request the home network to forward the packets to theguest network, using encapsulation [16]. This approach lookslike indirection approach mobility support solution, whichuses home router to redirect and forward encapsulated packetsto new destination.Figure 1. Content Producer and Consumer Data ExchangeProducer Mobility Support in NetInfProducer Mobility Support in DONAKoponen et al. [12] proposed the pioneer ICN approach calledDONA; focus more about replacement of host-centric networkto data-centric network paradigm. DONA used flat namespacefor NDO and self-certifying names to ensure the provision ofdata persistency and authenticity, that are organized aroundprincipals associated with named contents, public and privatekey pair and named contents [12]. Content names areorganized in the form of P:L, where P is the principal’scryptographic publisher key and L is the principal’s chosenlabel to identify the unique content name [5], [12], [13].Dannewitz et al. [17] proposed NetInf, a details ICN approachtargets large-scale content distribution to replace orsupplement current Internet architecture. NetInfo also used flatnamespace for NDO [17] and self-certifying names as in [12],Further, NetInf used two models, name resolution and namebased routing for retrieving NDOs [5], [17], [13], alsosupports a hybrid of name-based routing and name resolutionservice with the provision of routing hints [17]. The sourcenode has a choice to register with Name Resolution Service topublish NDOs or used routing protocol to announce routinghint. Furthermore, the hybrid approach were used for globalconnectivity with Border Gateway Protocol, (BGP)-like3273

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 6 (2018) pp. 3272-3280 Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.comrouting infrastructure combined binding with global nameresolution service [17].Figure 2 illustrates how name resolution and name-basedrouting works. In name-based routing approach, the client firstforwards a GET request of NDO between nodes until a cachedcopy of NDO is found or its reaches the original server orsource, the data are sent back to the client. Alternatively, theclient can perform a name resolution as alternative if therouters not have enough routing information. The clientforwards the request to the NRS, a DNS-like server to resolveand retrieved routing hints for that NDO name. The clientused the hint to retrieved data from best available source.Also, the data are sent back to the client with object cachedintermediary for subsequent used. These can either be mergedas hybrid or used separately in the network.Figure 2. Name Resolution ServicesIn a case of producer mobility support, NetInf fundamentallysupport all kind of mobility and multi-homing. Producermobility support is provided by regular updates of the routinginformation through name resolution [17] and the update isclaimed that can be suitably handle by NetInf [13]. The NRSin NetInf can serve like a DNS-Like serves in the mappingbased approach of producer mobility support scheme, themobile content producer can use both global and local NRS topublish its NDOs, in alternative uses routing protocol toannounce a routing hint. The content consumer forwards therequest to the NRS to resolve name and retrieved routing hint.Producer Mobility Support in CONETBN, border node locate at the border between differentnetwork and sub-system. Serving node can cached the nameddata for subsequent used, advertise and provide it whennecessary. SN can split named-data in to related sequence ofbytes to represent series of named-data CIUs and transmittedby carrier packets, BN forward those carrier packets usingrouting mechanism supported by CONET. Internal nodes wereoptional in the architecture, deployed in CONET sub systemto support in-network caching independent of BN. NameRouting Systems node used to promote route-by name process[20].When EN sent an Interest CIU requesting named data, BNchecks for the availability of the content if found in its cache,it would send back to the client otherwise CONET forward theInterest onward. If CONET Sub Systems (CSS) is IP network,the Interest should be forwarded-by-name with IP addressoverlay. IN along the path between the BN intercepts theInterest and checks it cache for relevant content, if not foundforward the request to the destination as directed in the IPaddress with the help of in-path IP router between two BN. Inshort, three different topologies were being supported byCONET, clean slate over layer two (L2), CONET over IPlayer and hybrid of CONET integrated in the IP layer [18],[19]. The CONET extended CONVERGENCE architecturebased on a common container of a content-centric andpublish-subscribe service model [20]. Also, PSIRP wasexpanded and explore further by PURSUIT for the model ofpublish-subscribe Internet architecture [21].Mobility in PURSUIT/PSIRP is supported for both consumerand producer with the help of Rendezvous System (RS) [21],[22]. Consumer mobility can be supported using Resubscribes to the content is the network, while producermobility can be achieved using producer/publisherUNREGISTER and RE-REGISTER their new informationwhen moving to new location and update information in theRS. In addition, information item is identified by RendezvousIdentifier (RI) for content or item specification and ScopeIdentifier (SI) for the location or scope in which contentbelongs. The RS mapped the RI and SI to form a ForwardingInformation (FI). PURSUIT separate identity from location tosupport mobility [21]. However, the existing FIs would beinvalidated and compute new routes for all consumers [13].The nature of the producer mobility support is similar toDONA architecture [23] that uses RH, CONET and NetInfarchitecture [17] uses NRS, at the same time similar to theconcept of DNS-Like mapping approach scheme of producermobility support solution.PRODUCER MOBILITY SUPPORT CHALLENGESCOntent NETwork architecture (CONET) was proposed toextend the CONVERGENCE [18] by improving networkscalability using route caching technique [19]. In CONETnodes are classified in to four groups, name routing systemnodes (NRSs), border nodes (BN), serving nodes (SN), endnodes (EN), and internal nodes (IN). The nodes exchangesinformation units for Data and Interest, labeled as InterestCIUs and named-data CIUs. EN refers to the user or client thatsends Interest request to the network for named data throughThe mobility support concern in ICN was generally dividedinto three categories, the consumer mobility, producermobility and network mobility. Producer mobility is thesupport for the content provider to relocate without disruptingconsumer and intermediate router for content name and itslocation. Some researchers indicates the natural mobilitysupport, as in [3] stated that, ICN supports and provides manybenefits upon deployment for and multicast mechanisms andin-network caching, to facilitate network efficiency and timely3274

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 6 (2018) pp. 3272-3280 Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.comdelivery of information to the users on mobile. In addition,caching was proposed to remedy losses as a result of handoffin the situation of mobile IP, as the caching enhances andsupport client mobility seamlessly [24]. Further, caching is anintegral part of ICN architecture to facilitates storage ofcaching NDOs therefore all ICN nodes such as mobileterminal and user-run home network were potentially havecaches [5]. However, in case of consumer mobility almost allapproaches were supporting it by default and architecturallymostly using in-network caching, which is the prominentfeature of ICN after naming.Consider Figure 3 that shows the scenario of consumermobility support for general approaches of ICN. Assuming acontent consumer connected to the same network looking for avideo clip, sent an Interest requesting that video to the accesspoint that can be a router or gateway. Once the router receivedan Interest, it will check if there is matching information withregards to the Interest, if found, the router retains the copy ofthe content and transfer back to the consumer, otherwise itwill forward it to the next router towards the source asindicated as step 1. The source will forward the requested databack to the destination in breadcrumb style, labeled throughstep 2, while the intermediate routers have the capability tocache the replied data packets into its content store forsubsequent uses.Simultaneously, another consumer can request the samecontent by forwarding the Interest to the connected router thathave the same content and the router can serve that consumerwithout transferring the request to the source. If consumermove to another location while receiving the contentrequested. After the establishment of connection to thenetwork, it will re-issue a previously sent Interest that has notyet satisfied to the router. However, some architectures orapproaches of ICN use other means to support mobility. Forexample, DONA uses RH to support both consumer andproducer mobility and NetInf uses named resolutionmechanism to support network, consumer and producermobility.DONA manages and provides support for both consumer andproducer mobility by changing edge RH attached to the host.For consumer mobility, any existing requests can simply beresend to the new RH to discover the new optimal source [12].A client as producer is allowed to re-REGISTER its contentsupon reestablishment of new session after relocation to newnetwork’s RH. Therefore, DONA supported producer mobilitywithout much challenges. However, unlike NDN, CCN,NetInf and other approaches, DONA architecture relied oncurrent Internet transport protocol TCP, for out-of-bandcontent delivery from source to destination. In addition, theregistration of source client must be renewed in certain periodas it has a given life-time. Hence support for mobile producerwas not guaranteed and the claimed of DONA as clean-slatewas not justified.Mobility and multi-homing supported in a global NetInfnetwork was based on automatic dynamic updates in the NRS.NetInf support network, consumer/client mobility andproducer mobility [5]. In terms of network mobility, LLC [25]provides very good support in routing and forwardingprocesses in NetInf. Also, GIN support client mobility withoutinflated look-up for routing table [26] and other networkbased services such as private data networks, disseminationservices, directory services, etc. Such services areimplemented by network protocols or network applications,run over the GIN nodes. Content provider or producermobility supported through NRS. When a copy of data movesbetween nodes, the movement result NRS update and accountsfor the new location [5]. Moreover, mobility and multihoming in NetInf can be realized based on dynamic NRSupdates of routing information and the updates are standardoperation in NetInf routing system for the announcement ofthe current location of IOs (Information Objects). Therefore,NetInf uses MDHT, LLC, GNI and HSkip as name-resolutionmechanisms to support mobility for both the three types andimproved stability and scalability of the network. However,there is no issue with NetInf as it was attained an excellentlevel with regards to mobility in general.In PURSUIT and PSIRP, when consumer re-locates it simplyuses publish/subscribe nature of the architecture to resubscribes the content being used to the network [21], [13].Therefore, consumer mobility was inherently achieved,however, producer mobility required to update the routinginformation, hence, producer mobility support was notguaranteed in PSIRP. In addition, producer mobility waslikely complex as it does require updating of routinginformation while consumer mobility was relatively straightforward [15]. Also, For consumer mobility, a client canunsubscribed change the location and re-subscribed again,then routing path will be computed and seamless handing overshould take place, while updating the routing sate of producermobility is complex [5].PRODUCER MOBILITY SUPPORT IN NDN/CCNFigure 3. Consumer Mobility Support in ICN approachesIn NDN architectural perspectives, mobility was divided intocontent consumer and producer mobility. Feng et al. [11] andSaxena et al. [27] reported that consumer mobility wasnaturally supported in NDN, when mobile consumer relocates3275

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 6 (2018) pp. 3272-3280 Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.comto another point of attachement (PoA), the unsatisfied Interestpackets needs to be resend due to the consumer-driven natureof NDN. However, the content producer mobility faces manyproblems similar to mobility in IP architecture, such as routingtable size scalling problem [28], introduces significantscallability challenge [13], offers long handoff delay andunnecessary Interest packet losses on transmission towards theold location of the content Producer [29], [30], for a largenetwork domain the frequent routing update cost highbandwidth utilization [13], [31] and the problems of tunnelingand triangular routing. The same problems arises in a case ofCCN as NDN rooted from it [6], [7].In NDN, when content provider relocates while sending a datato the consumer, the communication would be interrupted asshown in Figure 4. But the consumer will keep on sendingunsatisfied Interest towards the old location of the producer.The interruption occurred due to the difficulty for producer inNDN network to move away or change from hierarchicallocation, which can result to stale breadcrumbs inside FIBs[28]. Unless if the producers on mobile can dynamicallyannounce their namespaces to the network, hence producerson mobile must have a means for Interests to reach them.iv.Mapping of identifier and new locator should beprovided once mobile producer moved from onpoint to anotherv.A means for mapping processes should beprovided.Table 1 summarized some ICN architectures with theirmobility support, where almost all are supporting bothconsumer and producer mobility except CCN and NDN. ForPSIRP and PURSUIT the support of producer mobility is notwell highlighted, but producer mobility can be supported dueto the nature of publish/subscribe strategy of PSIRP andPURSUIT.Table 1. Summary of Mobility Support in ICNInformationCentric NetworkApproachesMobility SIRPYesNot surePURSUITYesNot sureCONETYesYesOVERVIEW ON NDN AND CCN ARCHITECTUREArchitectural Principles and Benefits of NDN/CCNFigure 4. Producer Mobility Un-supported in NDN/CCNFor NDN and CCN to support producer mobility, thefollowing issues need to be address:i.There is need for the network to route pending orunsatisfied Interest packets to the location ofproducer on mobileii.After handoff process mobile producer must haveany means for Interest packets to reach producer’snew locationiii.There is need to decouple identifier and locatorfrom the name prefix of NDNNDN is completely new architecture whose design principlesevolved from the successes of current Internet, that is IParchitecture [3, 4]. There are six architectural principles thatguided the design of NDN such as (i) the hourglassarchitecture centers on IP universal network layer, (ii)provision of security built in the architecture, (iii) retain andexpand end-to-end principle, (iv) self-regulating flow-balancedata delivery, (v) separation of routing and forwarding plane,and (vi) user choice and competition [33].3276

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 6 (2018) pp. 3272-3280 Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.comFigure 5. IP and NDN/CCN Hourglass Architecture [32]Figure 6. Node Data Forwarding Process for NDN/CCN [32]The thin waist of the current Internet hourglass architecturelocated at the centers of universal IP network layer, shown inFigure 5. The waist provides the global interconnectivity;allow upper and lower layer technologies to transformindependently designed for communications networks. Due tothe rapid growth of data demand over the Internet, led thedominant use as a distribution network that make it complexfor point-to-point communication protocol to solve [33].However, NDN maintain the hourglass architecture, butreplaces the thin waist with name objects or content chunksinstead of IP addresses or communication endpoints in everynode, as shown in Figure 5. The name can represent a datachunk, endpoint, command etc. The concept change by NDNprovide named data security, flow balance, in-networkstorage, multipath forwarding, and solve end-to-endcommunication, content distribution and control problems[32].Naming, Routing and Forwarding in NDNNDN uses self-certifying named data that is secured withdigital signature to achieve data authenticity, confidentialityand integrity which is one of the main objectives of NDNdesign. The architecture uses named data or content inhierarchical namespace structure for NDOs, thus, the namingscheme allows different application to choose its schemeindependent of the network refers to opaque of the network[32]. Additionally, the hierarchical structure of namingrepresents the context and its relationship for each application.An illustration in Figure 6, shows the forwarding processes onNDN node. When network was setup and client node(consumer) established a connection in the network. When theConsumer intends to retrieve data from the network, it willsend an Interest to NDN router. On arrival of the Interest, therouter checks the CS for matching data, if found its forwardthe data packets back to the consumer. Otherwise the routerlooks up the name content in its PIT for matching entries, ifentry was not found it will records the name content andincoming interface and forward the Interest to the next hopthrough FIB, otherwise it will aggregate and records theinterface only. The same process takes place up towards thecontent producer. Interest can be dropped on certaincircumstances depends on forwarding strategy e.g congestionof upstream links or security breaches by suspecting Interestto be part of DoS [32]. Once the data producer receivedInterest request from the home router and in its PIT found therequired content, it will forward the data packets back throughinterface received the Interest to the downstream interfacerecorded in PIT.To achieve routing and forwarding of packets, NDN usesnamed-base routing and possesses of two different types ofpackets, namely Interest and Data packets, as shown in Figure7. Also, NDN node can be represented as client consumer,producer or a router, that maintains three data structurePending Interest Table (PIT), Forwarding Information Base(FIB) and Content Store (CS), determines when and where toforward Data and Interest packets [4] as in Figure 6. PITrecords and store any incoming Interest information, FIBmaintained the Forwarding Strategy and decide when andwhere to forward Interest and CS is a temporary cache of datastored based on NDN caching policy.3277Interest PacketData PacketNameNameSelectorsMetaInfo(order preference,publisher filter,exclude filter )(content type,freshnessperiod )NonceContentGuidersSignature(scope, Interestlifetime)(signature type,key locator,signature bits )Figure 7. Packet Format for NDN [32]

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 6 (2018) pp. 3272-3280 Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.comAdditionally, each NDN/CCN node has the capability to cachedata and save in CS for subsequent use based on NDN/CCNcaching policy. Assuming another consumer want the samedata requested by previous consumer, as its connected thenforward its request, on the arrival of the Interest check the CSand found cached content requested by other consumer, therouter will retrieve and forward it back to consumer withoutforwarding upward to the original producer. However, unlikein IP network architecture where each consumer must have adedicated connection from source to destination, because itcannot support on-path caching. NDN/CCN also controllooping by symmetrical nature of Data/Interest exchangetargets hop-by-hop, unlike end-to-end packets delivery inrespect to IP address model. Similarly, NDN/CCN routing andforwarding strategy eliminates some problems exist in IParchitecture, such as NAT traversal, address management andspace exhaustion since name assignment are not required inlocal networks, namespaces were unbounded and NDN doaway with addresses.supported in NDN while Producer mobility cannot be su

Consequently, the Information-Centric Networking (ICN) paradigm was proposed as a clean-slate redesign to supplement and replace current host-centric Internet architecture, evolves to access the data independent from its location by replacing IP addresses with content named to solve the problems of CDN and P2P as well as the current .

Related Documents:

This document provides step-by-step instructions for the Producer Online Contracting Application process. TAKE NOTE: There are two options that apply for producer contracting: - Producer (Individual Producer only) - Producer Entity Agency (Individual Producer and Agency) This document has three sections: 1. Producer (Individual Producer Only) 2.

This document provides step-by-step instructions for the Producer Online Contracting Application process. TAKE NOTE: There are two options that apply for producer contracting: - Producer (Individual Producer only) - Producer Entity Agency (Individual Producer and Agency) This document has three sections: 1. Producer (Individual Producer Only) 2.

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan

service i Norge och Finland drivs inom ramen för ett enskilt företag (NRK. 1 och Yleisradio), fin ns det i Sverige tre: Ett för tv (Sveriges Television , SVT ), ett för radio (Sveriges Radio , SR ) och ett för utbildnings program (Sveriges Utbildningsradio, UR, vilket till följd av sin begränsade storlek inte återfinns bland de 25 största

Hotell För hotell anges de tre klasserna A/B, C och D. Det betyder att den "normala" standarden C är acceptabel men att motiven för en högre standard är starka. Ljudklass C motsvarar de tidigare normkraven för hotell, ljudklass A/B motsvarar kraven för moderna hotell med hög standard och ljudklass D kan användas vid

LÄS NOGGRANT FÖLJANDE VILLKOR FÖR APPLE DEVELOPER PROGRAM LICENCE . Apple Developer Program License Agreement Syfte Du vill använda Apple-mjukvara (enligt definitionen nedan) för att utveckla en eller flera Applikationer (enligt definitionen nedan) för Apple-märkta produkter. . Applikationer som utvecklas för iOS-produkter, Apple .

Vertical mergers h Examples of a vertical relationship: – producer and retailer – car parts producer and car producer – cement producer and concrete producer – electricity producer and distributor h Vertical mergers have implications which differ from horizo