Lightning Pin Injection Test: MOSFETS In "ON" State - NASA

1y ago
9 Views
2 Downloads
1.24 MB
38 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Albert Barnett
Transcription

NASA/TM–2011-217047Lightning Pin Injection Test: MOSFETS in“ON” StateJay J. Ely, Truong X. Nguyen, George N. Szatkowski, and Sandra V. KoppenLangley Research Center, Hampton, VirginiaJohn J. Mielnik and Roger K. VaughanLockheed Martin, Hampton, VirginiaSankalita SahaMCT/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CaliforniaPhilip F. WysockiASRC Aerospace, Moffett Field, CaliforniaJose R. CelayaStinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Moffett Field, CaliforniaJanuary 2011

NASA STI Program . . . in ProfileSince its founding, NASA has been dedicated tothe advancement of aeronautics and space science.The NASA scientific and technical information (STI)program plays a key part in helping NASA maintainthis important role.The NASA STI program operates under theauspices of the Agency Chief Information Officer. Itcollects, organizes, provides for archiving, anddisseminates NASA’s STI. The NASA STI programprovides access to the NASA Aeronautics and SpaceDatabase and its public interface, the NASA TechnicalReport Server, thus providing one of the largestcollections of aeronautical and space science STI inthe world. Results are published in both non-NASAchannels and by NASA in the NASA STI ReportSeries, which includes the following report types: TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports ofcompleted research or a major significant phaseof research that present the results of NASAprograms and include extensive data ortheoretical analysis. Includes compilations ofsignificant scientific and technical data andinformation deemed to be of continuingreference value. NASA counterpart of peerreviewed formal professional papers, but havingless stringent limitations on manuscript lengthand extent of graphic presentations.TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientificand technical findings that are preliminary or ofspecialized interest, e.g., quick release reports,working papers, and bibliographies that containminimal annotation. Does not contain extensiveanalysis.CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific andtechnical findings by NASA-sponsoredcontractors and grantees. CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collectedpapers from scientific and technicalconferences, symposia, seminars, or othermeetings sponsored or co-sponsored by NASA. SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific,technical, or historical information from NASAprograms, projects, and missions, oftenconcerned with subjects having substantialpublic interest. TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. Englishlanguage translations of foreign scientific andtechnical material pertinent to NASA’s mission.Specialized services also include creating customthesauri, building customized databases, andorganizing and publishing research results.For more information about the NASA STIprogram, see the following: Access the NASA STI program home page athttp://www.sti.nasa.gov E-mail your question via the Internet tohelp@sti.nasa.gov Fax your question to the NASA STI Help Deskat 443-757-5803 Phone the NASA STI Help Desk at443-757-5802 Write to:NASA STI Help DeskNASA Center for AeroSpace Information7115 Standard DriveHanover, MD 21076-1320

NASA/TM–2011-217047Lightning Pin Injection Test: MOSFETS in“ON” StateJay J. Ely, Truong X. Nguyen, George N. Szatkowski, and Sandra V. KoppenLangley Research Center, Hampton, VirginiaJohn J. Mielnik and Roger K. VaughanLockheed Martin, Hampton, VirginiaSankalita SahaMCT/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CaliforniaPhilip F. WysockiASRC Aerospace, Moffett Field, CaliforniaJose R. CelayaStinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Moffett Field, CaliforniaNational Aeronautics andSpace AdministrationLangley Research CenterHampton, Virginia 23681-2199January 2011

The use of trademarks or names of manufacturers in this report is for accurate reporting and does notconstitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, of such products or manufacturers by theNational Aeronautics and Space Administration.Available from:NASA Center for AeroSpace Information7115 Standard DriveHanover, MD 21076-1320443-757-5802

Table of ContentsTable of Contents. 1Table of Figures . 11 Background and Introduction . 22 Objective. 23 Approach . 23.1RTCA/DO-160 Lightning Waveform #4 . 33.2Facility and Equipment . 43.3Test Setup . 53.4Safety Hazards & Precautions . 114 Results Summary . 124.1Pre-Test . 124.1.1MOSFET Biasing . 134.1.2Polarity Versus Lead-Reversal . 154.1.3MOSFET Fail Levels: Pre-Test . 164.1.4Test Levels for Multiple Stroke Test Matrix . 204.2Test Matrix . 224.2.1IRF520 Versus IRF520N Devices . 244.3The “Ringing” Anomaly . 254.4Survey of Damage Assessment Techniques Based Upon Inspection . 264.4.1Microscope Inspection . 274.4.2X-Ray Inspection . 285 Preliminary Damage Assessment Based on Electrical Parameters . 296 Summary and Conclusions . 327 References . 33Table of FiguresFigure 1: IRF520NPBF MOSFET package . 3Figure 2: RTCA/DO-160E Section 22 Voltage Waveform 4. . 3Figure 3: Lightning-generating equipment was used for pin-injection tests. . 5Figure 4: Pin Injection Test Setup Schematic. . 6Figure 5: Component Testing Biasing/Lightning Injection Interface Board. . 7Figure 6: Pin Injection Test Hookup diagram. . 8Figure 7: Pin Injection Test Hookup Photograph . 9Figure 8: Circuit Schematic to enable Waveform 4 testing down to 40V Peak. 10Figure 9: R2 5 Ohms, R3 2.5 Ohms, implementation. . 10Figure 10: I-V Curves for IRF520PBF (25 Deg. C). . 13Figure 11: Drain ON versus Drain OFF Comparison. . 14Figure 12: Comparison of Positive Polarity, Lead Reversal and Negative Polarity. . 15Figure 13: Comparison of Fail Levels with WF4 and WF4- injected into MOSFET GS terminals. . 16Figure 14: Comparison of Fail Levels with WF4 and WF4- injected into MOSFET DS terminals. . . 17Figure 15: Comparison of Fail Levels with WF4 and WF4- injected into MOSFET GS terminals. . 18Figure 16: Comparison of Fail Levels with WF4 and WF4- injected into MOSFET DS terminals. . 19Figure 17: IRF520N (left) versus IRF520 (right, “shiny”) MOSFETS. . 24Figure 18: Comparison of Fail Levels with WF4 and WF4- injected into MOSFET DS terminals. . 24Figure 19: Oscilloscope display of “ringing” phenomena. . 25Figure 20: Installation of ferrite core on VGS Power supply terminal. 26Figure 21: Cross Section cut performed on IRF520 MOSFET. . 27Figure 22: X-Ray images of IRF520N MOSFET die, adhesive and internal wiring. . 28Figure 22: Turn-On characterization for lightning injected device in GS configuration . 30Figure 23: Leakage characterization for lightning injected device in GS configuration . 31Figure 24: Breakdown characterization for lightning injected device in GS configuration . 31Figure 25: Turn-On characterization for lightning injected device in GS configuration . 311

1Background and IntroductionThis publication builds upon NASA/TM-2009-215794 “Lightning Pin Injection Testing onMOSFETs”, where standard lightning waveforms were pin-injected into power metal-oxidesemiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) to induce fault modes and degrade performance. 1Previous testing showed that MOSFET (IRF520NPBF) Gate-Source connections may be susceptible tolightning-induced failure, even when installed in systems in well-shielded and partially-shielded aircraftlocations. MOSFET Drain-Source connections were shown to be significantly less susceptible. Previoustesting also showed that device impedance decreased (current increased) after every failure. Such afailure mode may lead to cascading failures, as the damaged MOSFET may allow excessive current toflow through other circuitry. Analysis of the characteristic curves of the devices showed that for certaininjection modes the devices can accumulate noticeable damage.2 In the previous testing, the MOSFETswere not connected to any external circuitry other than the lightning transient generator, and as such,without any bias voltage applied between Gate and Source (i.e. “OFF” state).The NASA Aviation Safety Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) Project is conducting thisresearch to determine early warning indicators of avionic semiconductor component degradation whichcan be used to predict the onset of system failures. To understand the interplay between lightning-inducedsurges and aging on component performance, a collaborative research effort has been established betweenNASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) HIRF Lab personnel and researchers at the NASA AmesResearch Center (ARC) Prognosis Center of Excellence to determine the effects of lighting inducedelectrical transients on MOSFET components. The purpose of this research is to develop validated tools,technologies, and techniques for automated detection, diagnosis and prognosis that enable mitigation ofadverse events during flight, such as from lightning transients.3 The effort fits within “Aircraft SystemsHealth Management” Discipline-Level research, Diagnosis milestone 2.1.2.2 and Prognosis milestone2.1.3.1; and “Advanced Sensors and Materials” Foundational-Level Research milestone 1.1.2.1. Thisreport describes lightning environmental testing which was performed in May 2009, where MOSFETSwere tested in the “ON” state.2ObjectiveThe test objective was to evaluate MOSFETs for induced fault modes caused by pin-injecting astandard lightning waveform into them while operating (i.e. connected to a Gate-driver circuit andelectrical current flowing between Drain and Source.). Lightning Pin-Injection testing was performed atNASA LaRC. Subsequent fault-mode and aging studies were performed by NASA ARC researchersusing the Aging and Characterization Platform for semiconductor components. This report documents thetest process and results, to provide a basis for subsequent lightning tests. The ultimate IVHM goal is toapply prognostic and health management algorithms using the features extracted during aging to allowcalculation of expected remaining useful life. This will counteract some of the negative effects of damageincurred by lightning by providing information prior to the components failure such that safe operation ofthe system is maintained.3ApproachNASA ARC IVHM researchers supplied 300 IRF520NPBF power MOSFETs. IRF520NPBFMOSFETs are manufactured in a TO-220 package as shown in Figure 1. The IRF520NPBF was selectedto be representative of devices that are present in DC-DC power supplies and electromechanical actuatorcircuits that will be used on board future aircraft. Most of the MOSFETs were characterized prior to2

arriving at LaRC using the NASA ARC Aging and Characterization Platform for power transistors.4Elements of the system were transported to NASA LaRC to use for characterizing damage caused bylightning pin-injected transients. Damage is characterized by measuring key static parameters, namely,threshold voltage, leakage current and breakdown voltage. The MOSFETs were tested in the “ON” stateby applying a bias-voltage between Gate-Source or Drain-Source during lightning pin-injection. “ON”state testing required transient voltage protection of the DC sources used for biasing, as well as additionalload resistors to limit DC current through the MOSFET. (More test setup details are provided in Section3.3.)G D SFigure 1: IRF520NPBF MOSFET package (left), Schematic (center) and photograph (right). Gate, Drain andSource are labeled “G”, “D”, and “S”, respectively.3.1RTCA/DO-160 Lightning Waveform #4The RTCA/DO-160E “Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment”,Section 22 “Lightning Induced Transient Susceptibility”, was used.5 DO-160E Section 22 includesprocedures for pin-injection and cable bundle tests, and is intended for establishing flight worthiness ofairborne equipment. DO-160E test processes are intended for assembled electronic systems, rather thanindividual components, so these tests were modified to accommodate the special situation of testingindividual components. The DO-160E lightning- induced voltage Waveform 4 “6.4us-Rise DoubleExponential” was selected for these tests. (See Figure 2.) DO-160E recommends Waveform 4 forairborne equipment that may be subjected to lightning-induced magnetic fields coupled onto their wiring.(Waveform 3, “Damped Sinusoid”6 is also recommended for pin injection testing, however Waveform 4was favored by the NASA team because Waveform 4 contains more energy per event, and is thus morelikely to induce damage than Waveform 3. The NASA equipment is also capable of testing at lowervoltage levels using Waveform 4.) Peak DO-160E Test Levels for Waveform 4 are shown in Table 1.DO-160E allows devices to be un-powered during pin-injection testing, which may lead to results that arenot representative of airborne equipment operating in an actual lightning environment.Figure 2: RTCA/DO-160E Section 22 Voltage Waveform 4.3

Table 1: DO-160E Generator Setting Levels for Pin Injection (Source Impedance for WF4 5 Ohms)Level123453.2RepresentativeEnvironmentWell ShieldedPartial ShieldedPartial ExposedSevereMore SevereWaveform 4Voc/Isc50/10125/25300/60750/1501600/320Facility and EquipmentAll testing was conducted in NASA’s High Intensity Radiated Field (HIRF) Laboratory, located inBuilding 1220, Room 144, on 1 South Wright Street at NASA LaRC, between May 5 and May 29, 2009.The HIRF Laboratory is typically used for reverberation chamber radiated emissions and immunitytesting. However, the reverberation chambers are easily adapted to lightning testing. An overview ofHIRF Laboratory capability is provided in the Reference section7,8,9. The HIRF Laboratory is equippedwith EMC Partner MIG-System generators for lightning indirect effects testing, and is capable ofperforming DO-160E Section 22, up to Test Level 5 for pin, cable and ground injection for Waveform 4.The HIRF laboratory is also able to perform other waveform and multiple stroke and multiple burst tests,as well as additional test types beyond DO-160E. Figure 3 shows the EMC Partner equipment that wasused for pin-injection tests, and Table 2 summarizes the test equipment used.Equipment ItemImpulse Gen.Step Down 1:8 TransformerOscilloscopeCurrent Sensor 100XCurrent Sensor 100XHigh Voltage Probes (2)DC Power Supply (20V, 5A)DC Power Supply (30V, 3A)Transient Voltage SupressorTransient Voltage SupressorTransient Voltage SupressorBiasing/Lightning Injection InterfaceBoardMOSFET Test BoardTable 2: Test EquipmentManufacturer/ModelEMC Partner MIG0600MSEMC Partner NW-MS-Level1Tektronix DPO4054Pearson 5046Pearson 4997Tektronix P5100Tenma 72-6152Tenma ned & Fabricated by JohnMielnikProvided By NASA 121314/A037687N/AA014924A014923N/AN/AN/AN/ACal. N/AN/AN/AN/A*The Pearson 5046 and 2997 Current Sensor calibrations were expired during this test. Subsequently, onAugust 28, 2009, the probe calibrations were verified to be within specification.(NASA Ames personnel used a Component Evaluation System, consisting of a Keithley 2410 SourceMeter,a Dell PP05XA Notebook computer and a National Instruments GPIB-USB-HS adapter for their MOSFETcharacterizations. The NASA Ames equipment was not part of the pin injection test setup but is laterdescribed in Section 5 of this report.)4

Figure 3: Lightning-generating equipment was used for pin-injection tests. (EMC Partner MIG0600MS shown onright.)3.3Test SetupMOSFETs are active circuit devices. Operationally, the Drain-Source (D-S) impedance varies as theGate-Source (G-S) voltage changes. Operation of a MOSFET requires external biasing circuitry. For theprevious NASA/TM-2009-215794 testing, the MOSFET was not part of an active circuit, so test setupconsisted of simply connecting the lightning generator and oscilloscope to two terminals of the MOSFET.Pin injecting lightning transients into a MOSFET that is “ON” requires consideration of the biasingcircuitry in several different ways: Protection of biasing circuitry from the lightning transient.Protection of the MOSFET from excessive current applied by biasing circuitry.Protection of the Lightning Generator from excessive current applied by biasing circuitry.Assurance that biasing circuitry does not corrupt the MOSFET test results by modifying thelightning transient waveform.A test circuit satisfying these requirements was designed by the test team. The schematic is shown inFigure 4. Essentially VDS and VGS function to bias the MOSFET D-S and G-S junctions such that thedevice is in the ON state as the lightning pin injected transient is applied. A Fischer CustomCommunications (FCC) Transient Voltage Suppressor (TVS) was installed in parallel to both voltagesources. The TVS devices function to bypass the voltage sources when the lightning transient is applied5

(thereby protecting the voltage sources). Current Sense Resistors (R1 0.01 Ohms and R2 0.01 Ohms)are at the Drain and Gate inputs to facilitate measurement of direct current, using a differential probe.Current-limiting resistors (R3 and R4, 10 Ohms each) are in-line with VGS and VDS to limit the directcurrent through the G-S and D-S junctions, so as not to cause unnecessary heating to the MOSFET orexcessive direct current through the lightning waveform generator.The lightning transient was applied to either the G-S junction or the D-S junction, but not bothsimultaneously. The lightning waveform generator has an internal impedance of 5 Ohms, so it wasreplaced by a 5 Ohm resistor (R5) when not present. The G-D pin-injection configuration was not testedbecause such a test would require significant additional effort to protect the lightning generator and powersupplies in the event of a G-D short-circuit MOSFET failure mode. The MOSFET Source terminal isusually referenced to ground, so the G-S and D-S junctions are more likely to provide a lightning transientpath than the G-D junction (i.e. lightning transients impart much more energy to common-mode ratherthan differential-mode coupling to aircraft wiring bundles). This rationale for not testing G-D is alsosupported by RTCA/DO-160, which notes that pin injection is usually conducted between each pin andcase ground.10R1.01OhmR2.01 Ohm VGSVDSTVS2TVS1-R4 10OhmR3 10OhmR5 5OhmVLVLR5 5OhmFigure 4: Pin Injection Test Setup Schematic.In order to implement the MOSFET test circuit with safe, repeatable hookups, and test port access foroscilloscope and DC voltmeters, and to allow the use of interchangeable components (i.e. TVS devices), aComponent Testing Biasing/Lightning Injection Interface Board was designed and fabricated. Highvoltage components, recessed banana jacks and wide circuit-board traces were used to ensure personnelsafety. A photograph of the board is shown in Figure 5.6

Figure 5: Component Testing Biasing/Lightning Injection Interface Board.The Component Testing Biasing/Lightning Injection Interface Board was the focal point of the pininjection test hookup. The MOSFET under test was mounted in the NASA Ames IV-Curve Test Boardused in previous testing (NASA/TM-2009-215794), which was connected to the Component TestingBiasing/Lightning Injection Interface Board. Two handheld digital voltmeters were used to monitor theDC current flowing through the MOSFET G-S and D-S circuits, using the current sense resistors. Theuse of a four channel oscilloscope, two high-voltage probes, and two current transformer probes allowedsimultaneous monitoring of injected lightning voltage and current on both G-S and D-S circuits. Acomplete Pin Injection Test Hookup diagram is provided in Figure 6. A photograph of the hookup isprovided in Figure 7. Oscilloscope settings are provided in Table 3 and the Lightning Generatorconnections & settings are provided in Table 4.Table 3: Oscilloscope onOffsetProbe InputImpedanceSetting20 uS (WF4)Edge, Source Ext. Coupling DC, Slope Pos, Level 8000mVChannel 1Channel 2Channel 1(G-S Voltage)(G-S Current)(D-S Voltage)VariedVariedVariedDCDCDC0 Div0 Div0 Div0V0A0V100X Voltage100X Current100X Voltage1M Ohm1 MOhm1M Ohm7Channel 2(D-S Current)VariedDC0 Div0A100X Current1 MOhm

GS HV ProbePearson CurrentMonitor Probes100xDS HV ProbeGSPowerSupplyDSPowerSupplyDS BypassJumperGS BypassJumper10 Ohm DC Limiting Resistor5 Ohm LVBypassResistor10 Ohm DC Limiting ResistorLightning Transient GeneratorLV Hi OutLV Lo OutFigure 6: Pin Injection Test Hookup diagram. (HV Lines were each 81.5” 43.0” 124.5 inches long.Two sections allowed connection-to/bypass-of Attenuator Box.)8

Figure 7: Pin Injection Test Hookup PhotographTable 4: MIG0600MS Lightning Generator Connections & SettingsConnections-HV-Trigger-Use NW-MS-LEVEL1 Attenuator box if VPeak below 50V-Use Resistor Network if VPeak between 50V and 70VSettings1. On/Stby Press2. Safety Ckt- Closed3. Waveform 44. VPeak: Test Matrix5. Polarity: “Pos” or “Neg”6. Trig. Mode: SS Manual, MS Auto, Test Time, Repetition9

Some testing required pin-injection levels below DO-160 Level 1. The EMC Partner MIG0600MSLightning Waveform generator does not allow testing below 70V peak. The NW-MS-Level1 Boxreduces the open circuit voltage (OCV) to 1/8 the output of the MIG0600MS, allowing 9 to 50V OCVtest. To accommodate test voltages between 50V and 70V, a resistor network was used to reduce OpenCircuit voltage of Waveform 4 by half, while still maintaining the correct source impedance.Operationally, the MIG0600MS is set to a voltage 2 times higher than the desired OCV when using theresistor network. A schematic of the resistor network is shown in Figure 8, and photographs of theimplementation are shown in Figure 9. As an accuracy check, Waveform 4 with MIG0600MS setting of40V was applied across the MOSFET GS terminals. 47.7V was measured when using the resistornetwork (19% change from 40V), whereas 52.3V was measured when using the NW-MS-Level1 (31%change from 40V). Based upon these results, the resistor network was more accurate, and was preferredfor the 35V to 50V overlapping range.R3R1VLightning R2RLR1 5 Ohm Lightning Generator Source ImpedanceRL Load Impedance of Test Device (unknown)R2 5 Ohms (tested to within 0.1 Ohm)R3 2.5 Ohms (tested to within 0.1 Ohm)Figure 8: Circuit Schematic to enable Waveform 4 testing down to 40V Peak with MIG0600MS TransientGenerator.Figure 9: R2 5 Ohms (in parallel, top photograph), R3 2.5 Ohms (in series, bottom photograph), implementation.10

3.4Safety Hazards & PrecautionsTest Personnel were briefed on the standard HIRF Laboratory Safety procedures, including: Location of ExitsMarshalling AreasLocation of Fire Extinguishers and AEDs, qualified AED RespondersOut-Of-The-Ordinary operations: (i.e. construction, blocked exits, auditory alarms, other testing,etc.)The following warning was prominently displayed in the test Plan:WARNINGThe transient generators used in these tests produce lethal voltageand current levels.Exercise all operational safety precautions to prevent injury ordeath of test and support personnel.A Hazards Identification Meeting was held to discuss additional safety hazards and to identifyprecautions and controls to mitigate them. Table 5 shows the hazards identified and their precautions andcontrols.Table 5: Lightning Generator Connections & SettingsHazardPrecaution1. High Voltages (HV): Source MeasurementAll Personnel: 1ft Clearance from Device and all HVUnitconnections when Keithley 2410 SourceMeter BlueLight is ON.2. High Voltages: Lightning Transient GeneratorAll Personnel: 1ft Clearance from Device and all HVconnections when Generator is in RUN Mode.3. Un-Authorized Personnel in Test Area-Post “DANGER: TEST IN PROGRESS” sign duringall HV test operations.-Test Personnel instructed to Stop Test whenUnauthorized personnel in Chamber B.4. Device Destruction during HV TestPlace Clear Safety Shield over device during lightningtransient testing.5. Inadvertent Operation Lightning Transient-Push SAFETY CIRCUIT button to OFF on LightningGeneratorTransient Generators when test operations are not beingconducted.11

4Results Summary4.1Pre-TestA Pre-Test procedure was used to determine the single-stroke test level required to cause permanentdamage, for each input pin configuration. The pin-configuration nomenclature used in this report is basedupon NASA/TM-2009-215794 (MOSFET in the “OFF” state) for consistency and comparison, but wasmodified because the MOSFET biasing circuitry responds differently to MIG0600MS lead-reversalversus polarity change. (Lead reversal versus polarity change is discussed in Section 4.1.2.)PinConfiguration G-S G-S D-S D-STable 6: Pin Connection & Polarity NomenclatureMIG0600MS Lightning Voltage - Lightning VoltageWaveformConnected To:Connected To:4 GateSource4GateSource4 DrainSource4DrainSourceThe Lightning Transient Generator was connected as shown in Figures 4 and 6. Single strokeWaveform 4 was used for all tests because it is representative of a voltage waveform likely to be presenton aircraft interconnecting wiring paths due to the Current Component A wave shape, caused bystructural IR voltages and diffusion coupling.11 Also, Waveform 4 was used for most of the previousNASA/TM-2009-215794 data, so it is preferred for comparisons with new data. For a particular pinconfiguration, the test level was increased until a change was observed on the current & voltagewaveforms displayed on the oscilloscope. The MOSFET was then evaluated using the NASA ARCsource and measurement unit

NASA STI Program . . . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the advancement of aeronautics and space science. The NASA scientific and technical information (STI) program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain this important role. The NASA STI program operates under the auspices of the Agency Chief Information Officer. It

Related Documents:

JP3 LVDS VLCD 5V/3.3V /12V Select 4-Pin Block J1 (Pin 1-3) Clear CMOS Setting 10-Pin Block J1 (Pin 5-7) Clear ME Setting 10-Pin Block J1 (Pin 2-4) AT/ATX Mode Function Select 10-Pin Block J1 (Pin 6-8) Disable ME Function Select 10-Pin Block J1 (Pin 9-10) 2-Pin Buzzer Header 10-Pin Block .

Creating new Lightning Page using Lighting App Builder Salesforce Lightning pages can be created using Lightning App Builder. To create, navigate to Build Lightning Bolt Lightning App Builder New. Lightning App Builder - App page. In this step, select App page and click on next button as shown below. Lightning App Builder

2021 ANNUAL LIGHTNING REPORT V aisala 2022 Global lightning detection for more than 10 years. Vaisala's owned-and-operated . Global Lightning Dataset GLD. 360 is the only truly global lightning detection network and has been detecting lightning around the planet since 2009. It is the most advanced and accurate long-range lightning detection .

6 Cylinders 1 MODEL NO. 1 Product Numbers 2 Keyways 2 KEYWAY 3 CAM OR TAILPIECE 4 FINISH 5 KEYING Mortise Cylinders Model Description 7124 3 4" (19 mm) 4 Pin 7155 15 16" (23.8 mm) 5 Pin 7165 1" (25.4 mm) 5 Pin 7185 11 8" (28.6 mm) 5 Pin Drilled 6 Pin 7186 11 8" (28.6 mm) 6 Pin 7205 11 4" (31.7 mm) 5 Pin Drilled 7 Pin 7206 11 4" (31.7 mm) 6 Pin Drilled 7 Pin .

bulk, strained-Si and ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs, FINFETs, double gate MOSFETs and Schottky barrier MOSFETs. Here, results for silicon germanium and bulk silicon devices with channel length of 25 nm are presented. In the present form, tools are limited to the case of fully ballistic transport, which might be reached by the extremely scaled MOSFETs

about whether the point is an intra-cloud lightning (IC) or a ground-cloud lightning (GC). Our test dataset consists of altogether 5565 CG and 2919 IC lightning points. A static plot of lightning data as illust-rated in Fig. 1 is obviously limited for the investigation of the dynamics in lightning data. Therefore, interactive visual analyti-

Refer to AC 43.13-2A/1B. . 2955 Main Road East Emmaus, PA 18049 610-928-3420 www.tcwtech.com email: support@tcwtech.com. 4 pin 9- start contactor pin 8- LED power pin 7- power pin 6- start switch pin 5- arming switch pin 4- armed pwr pin 3- armed LED - pin 1-ground pin 2-ground SmartStart TM Battery Master Solenoid 5 amp Wiring Diagram SS-12v

Infiniti G25 (Smart Key) 2011-2012 Gray, pin 2 Lt. Blue or Red, pin 2 G35 (Smart Key) 2007-2009 Gray, pin 2 Lt. Blue or Red, pin 2 G37 (Smart Key) 2008-2013 Gray, pin 2 Lt. Blue or Red, pin 2 Nissan 370Z (Smart Key) 2009-2013 Gray, pin 2 Brown, pin 2, or Lt. Blue, pin 1 Altima (Smart Key) 2