Transforming Strategic Risk Management To Realize Competitive Advantage

1y ago
8 Views
2 Downloads
841.02 KB
18 Pages
Last View : 22d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Louie Bolen
Transcription

Transforming strategic riskmanagement to realizecompetitive advantage

Table of contents1. Re-considering the current role and tools of the risk function The evolving role of the CRO44 Changing gears – From qualitative to quantitative tailored business decisions5 Adjusting the lenses – Moving beyond the traditional risks into a new risk universe6 From ex-post to ex-ante – From the rear-view mirror to virtual simulation projectors6 Becoming a more nimble organization72. The constant challenge for efficiency and effectiveness8 Data as a critical asset or organizational fuel9 Infrastructure changes can improve efficiency and effectiveness10 Culture promoting partnership with third parties, especially regulators103. Using new technology to improve market competitiveness12 Enhancing risk IT 12 Mobilizing talent and culture 134. Finding the way forward 14 Three initiatives to transform SRM 14Genpact Report 2

Transforming strategic riskmanagement to realizecompetitive advantageAdvanced digital technologies are having ahuge impact on risk functions. In a digitalfuture, the chief risk officer’s remit willextend further, while the risk function willencompass both detecting risks and helpingdefine and achieve business strategy.The old business order is breaking down, as new typesThe survey focused on the SRM framework, in which therisk function is represented by the CRO and factored intodefining and operationalizing a bank’s business strategy.However, the rise of digital technology and its potentiallyradical impact on all bank operations dictate that the role ofthe CRO must evolve beyond its present one of consultantand subject matter expert to become more strategic andproactive.of risk emerge, banks widen their customer services, andIn a digital world, what might the roles of the CRO andan explosion of data and technologies disrupt the statusthe risk function look like? We challenged ourselves toquo. The banking universe is rapidly changing, and inimagine what these could be, as aligned with the findingsthe last 10 years firms have materially improved theirin the survey and the views expressed by the CROs werisk management practices, including governance andinterviewed. In our vision:processes, such as planning, risk appetite, forecasting, andlimit setting. Now, there is an urgent need to evolve theirstrategic risk management (SRM)1 capabilities to allow forbetter, faster forward-looking risk assessments, particularlygiven SRM’s direct impact on market competitiveness.Genpact and the European Risk Management Councilconducted a survey2 of more than 50 chief risk officers(CROs) at global financial services institutions. Weexamined how the risk function contributes to developing,evaluating and supporting the implementation of their SRM becomes the guiding light of the enterprise riskstrategy The CRO becomes the watcher on the wall, detectingneeds and anticipating the future The risk function becomes the conduit for aligningbusiness operations to business strategy SRM becomes the hungry consumer of massive,disparate data to provide near-time risk advice usingpredictive toolsbusiness strategy. We explored three key areas: the currentIn the following four sections of this report prepared bystate of their risk framework; key challenges; and newGenpact, we discuss these views, with insights from thetechnologies and applications.CROs interviewed, who are experiencing the evolution firsthand. We conclude with next steps and three initiativesthat can transform SRM.Strategic risk management is how a bank fully aligns its risks to the business strategy,for example, leveraging scenarios for forward-looking analysis of the aggregated riskprofile against the appetite.12Details on the survey are provided on page 16.Genpact Report 3

Re-considering the current roleand tools of the risk functionThe evolving role of the CROIn our vision of the future, many recent advances intechnology have been implemented and risk is a fullyto monitoring its execution. The board view of the CRO’srole is to provide risk assessment of products and business,monitor risk-based performance and produce forwardlooking trends on short-term horizons.digitized function. The role of the CRO in this new SRMframework will be to provide real-time strategic advice tothe business, reducing unwanted exposures, managingportfolio investment and optimizing capital allocation.The “live” advice will be based on risk and data analytics,and projected performance – no more stale data critical“The role of risk is to enable business to domore, but in a controlled, safe, risk-awaremanner, not just to stop risk taking.”– Non-executive director of a global investment bankbusiness decisions.On the board, the CRO will become decision maker andadvisor. The CRO will analyze the implications of thebusiness strategy and risk appetite for any business,product, and geography under various macroeconomic andmicroeconomic scenarios, while artificial intelligence (AI)tools will help optimize future outcomes. Currently, thisis significantly different as the CRO is not often a regularmember of the board, but an attendee invited on an ad-hocbasis. According to our survey, many CROs do not activelyparticipate in defining the business strategy, but are limitedThe CRO’s new role as decision maker and advisor will bemulti-faceted, requiring different hats to be worn, suchas that of a challenger to business heads and team playerto executive committees. It will demand that the CROpossesses excellent communication skills, deep knowledgeof risk, and IT knowledge. The CRO’s responsibility willchange, strengthening the value-add contribution. TheCRO will actively manage the holistic impact of risks witha focus on balance sheet performance. The CRO will alsofurther enhance business performance by improving risk.Genpact Report 4

Changing gears – Fromqualitative to quantitativetailored business decisionsAccording to our survey, the current view of risksThe role of risk executives will change from supportingbehavioural and demographic data to extend their riskassociated with the business strategy needs to widenbeyond traditional market, credit, and operational risks.Most banks already have vast amounts of data andthis trend will continue as the banks will use social,to enabling strategic decisions – protecting shareholdervalue, assessing capital efficiency, and improving financialperformance. The risk function will support the CRO with360 coverage of emerging risk trends and mitigationmanagement functions. This information will be used ina concise, focused way through a combination of machinelearning (ML), natural language processing /generation(NLP/G), and AI robotics.strategies and forward-looking views of the firm’s riskThis vision again contrasts with the current tools andprofile. This will enable the CRO to deliver holisticapproach used by banks to implement SRM (see figure 3).information to stakeholders for making informed strategicThe enterprise risk management (ERM)3 framework hasdecisions (see figures 1 and 2).become the main tool to support implementing strategy,together with the related tools of risk appetite, stress testsand reporting.60%50%53.66%These tools, unless enhanced, cannot fully meet the36.59%40%needs of the digitized world, where new risks emerge dueto product and technology innovation, traditional risks30%become highly volatile, and the CRO provides a forward-20%looking view continually updated by possible future states10%of the Figure 1: To what extent are risks considered as part of yourorganization’s strategic and business planning process?31.37%Strategic planning processEnterprise wide risk assessment63.41%34.15%Business plan assessmentMaterial risk assessment80%Risk appetite assessment75.61%70%31.71%60%New product/process assessment50%Ongoing monitoring40%Other (please specify)78.05%48.78%41.46%7.32%30%20%10%Figure 3: What is the framework / methodology used to assessthe company’s risk profile? (Please select all that apply)19.51%4.88%0%Fully support our planningand decision-making processesPartiallysupportDon’tsupportFigure 2: Do the current strategic risk management reportssupport you in delivering against strategic objectives?3In this document we refer to ERM as a framework (processes, people, and tools) used toenable strategic risk management.Genpact Report 5

Adjusting the lenses – Movingbeyond the traditional risksinto a new risk universeBased on our survey, strategic risk needs to encompassa wider category of risks, which should be continuouslyrefreshed:“Risk will be more and more about makingmoney.”– CRO, Asian global systemically important bank (GSIB)In contrast, the digital world will require a CRO, whoprovides a holistic view of enterprise risk powered byadvanced predictive analytics and a deep understanding Strategic risks: any business risks which could hinder ordisrupt the implementation of the business strategy Emerging risks and operational risk: more granularholistic risk, including emerging risks, such as reputationand sentiment risk. Also, critical components ofoperational risks are technology-related risks, such ascybersecurity and blockchain Financial risks: although including traditional market,of emerging risks, and who understands the impacts oncapital, shareholder value, and portfolio optimization.From ex-post to ex-ante – Fromthe rear-view mirror to virtualsimulation projectorscredit and liquidity risks, they require differentCurrent strategic actions are based on stale, historical viewstreatment due to real-time change of market, client, andthat are used for forward-looking scenarios, which arestakeholder conditionsdifficult to define and execute, leading to poor decisions Compliance and third-party risk: these risks now extendbeyond regulators to include legal and third-party risksas the value chain of the risk function is intermediated,for example, pricing/ valuation models are assembledthrough the use of in-house and cloud marketsThe scope of the risk function, currently often limited to riskassessment and risk advice, also needs to widen. Accordingto our survey, there is a dichotomy in the CRO’s role in thatthe CRO monitors strategy execution rather than contributingtowards the strategy itself. Participants also highlightedthat the CRO was more accepted for traditional risks, such asmarket and credit, but not for more qualitative risks, such as(see figure 5). The future CRO will provide a holistic view ofall types of risk within seconds, accompanied by advancedearly warning systems driven by real-time events and data.These risks will be tested against future scenarios andoutcomes will be able to be predicted before risk mitigationactions are executed. These predictive capabilities will nowbe fully aligned to strategic key performance indicators.Fifty-eight percent of respondents feel thatthe CRO is a decision maker and contributesto strategic decisions.reputation, political, or strategic decisions (see figure 4).60%50%58.54%40%34.15%30%20%10%7.32%0%Very closely involved,ie Risk manager is an‘important decision-makerProvide inputs, butnot directly involvedin decision-makingInformed, butnot involvedNot involvedat allFigure 4: How would you describe risk management’s level of involvement in your company’s strategic decision-makingprocess (e.g., acquisitions, divestitures, investments, portfolio management, capital allocations)?Genpact Report 6

Becoming a more nimbleorganization40%35%36.59%30%34.15%25%For the risk function to play a leading role in business20%strategy, banks will need to change their culture to become15%more elastic and agile, adjusting to the new yMonthly Risk profile is Not at allupdated asmaterial risks areidentifiedreality.Introducing digital technology, AI, and cognitiveOthers(Pleasespecify)Figure 5: How frequently does the organization evaluatethe company’s risk profile and assess its impact onthe business strategy and plan?“SRM is only as good as the weakest pointin the chain that is required to provideappropriate inputs to the board.”– CRO, UK digital challenger bankThis vision of real-time data analysis, which enables drilldown on risk performance indicators aligned to strategy,contrasts with the current situation observed in our survey.Most banks produce quarterly or ad hoc strategy-relatedrisk reports, while producing daily risk reports for products,LOBs, and legal entities based on short-horizon scenarios.The ability to perform real-time what-if scenarios andnavigate the results by using intelligent interfaces with AIcomputing will change the functional composition ofthe lines of defence, for example, automatic approval ofmortgages by smartphone.The survey reveals that speed to reporton ad hoc requests regarding existing andemerging risks varies and can take up to 120days for bottom-up scenarios.Furthermore, the intermediation of certain risk functionsto other groups within the bank and to third-partyproviders could change the size and shape of the linesof defence. Conversely, new types of risk could requirethe rapid enhancement of risk functions, for example,cybersecurity, digital risk, and related contagion risk.Seventy percent of survey respondents haveidentified data as the primary challenge,followed by legacy infrastructure and culture.robotics is also in stark contrast with the static and limitedscope of reports.Genpact Report 7

The constant challenge forefficiency and effectivenessRisk efficiency can be measured by the ability to provideAI and blockchain technologies will accelerate risk processreal-time insights for strategic and operational decisions.efficiency, from customer on-boarding to servicing, andWe envision two waves of improvement in efficiencyfrom risk origination to collateral management. Cognitiveand effectiveness: through robotics and automation; androbotics will be used for decision making on variousthrough AI, blockchain, and the cloud. The first wave ofmeasures, including financial and non-financial risksimprovement will see the implementation of roboticsmeasurement, shareholder value protection strategies,and automation along with cloud services. The secondcapital utilization, portfolio optimization, dynamic limits,wave of digitization will see AI, blockchain, and cloudand mitigation strategies.ecosystems delivering substantial benefits in financialperformance, while significantly improving risk efficiencyand effectiveness.“Timeliness of data is the key challenge.”– Head Risk Strategy, GSIB bankRobotics, ML, NLP, and NLG will improve efficiency in anumber of operations risk management functions, such asautomating underwriting and credit approval processesand providing risk aggregation explain capabilities,which will provide fast insights into risk drivers for P&Lattribution. Critical functions, such as stress testing andwhat-if analysis, will be improved by ML and AI, where newscenarios are proposed based on data mining, or criticalrisk factors are identified for the scenario execution.“Old IT infrastructure means inefficiencyin report production. Ideally, you wantreports produced in one day and new techplays a big role in enabling this.”– CRO, major European bankThe future digital world will not differentiate between riskmanagement and SRM, as both cover the continuum ofrisk management. SRM will provide a holistic view of riskat different levels of granularity and will be continuouslyre-aligned to the business strategy. This will be achievedthrough improvements in the efficiency of risk operations,the effectiveness of the risk function, and the new role ofCRO.This vision departs significantly from the currentexperience of CROs and the risk function in supportingbusiness strategy and managing risks. At present, quarterlyor ad hoc strategic risk reports are not considered criticalto business strategy. Survey respondents saw these riskreports as too difficult to produce, lacking reliable data,having high production costs, and complicated by legacysystems and the culture within banks. All these factorsare seen as inhibiting the CRO’s ability to be more activelyengaged in the business strategy.Genpact Report 8

Data as a critical asset ororganizational fuelImproving the effectiveness of risk functions will dependon the availability of reliable data (as internal data isaugmented with external data) and the availability ofpredictive analytics. Also, the use of common data willimprove the quality of risk insights for different levels ofrisk granularity across the hierarchy of product/businessline/legal entity/group. This is in line with the expectationsof CROs today, who would be happy with more directionallycorrect information rather than fully precise informationfor decision making (See figure 6).Eighty percent of respondents have plans toaddress operational challenges in the nextfive years.The ability to ingest external data from a variety of sources,extract knowledge, and integrate it with internal datawill be critical. Data wrangling technologies are alreadyavailable and can accelerate the ingestion of data byallowing business users to speedily extract, map, and useexternal data (structured and unstructured) to developmodels. These capabilities, combined with ML and NLG,will accelerate the use of multidimensional informationand provide risk insights in near-time.The automation of risk processes will see further80%operational efficiencies in managing traditional market,77.78%70%credit, operational, and liquidity risks. For example, we will60%see the deduction of credit losses as credit risk models use a50%wider pool of data from the client’s ecosystem.40%Risk operations will become generally more efficient30%20%through the use of ‘compliance by design’ standards22.22%embedded in products and operations. This approach,10%combined with the robotic automation of many risk0%Effective - being 100% accurateeven if it takes longer to producethe results orEfficient - being directionallycorrect if it can help youget results instantlyFigure 6: What is more important to you, while improvingrisk capabilities, between being effective or efficient?processes, will lead to risk management by exception,which reduces human error and detects inappropriateemployee behaviour. Robots will use ML to understandand learn from exceptions, leading to the continuousimprovement of risk management processes. This visionaligns well with the current thinking of risk managementstakeholders (see figure 7).60%50%52.78%40%36.11%30%20%10%0%Less than 3 yearsBetween 3 and 5 years5.56%5.56%Longer than 5 yearsDon’t knowFigure 7: What is the timeframe you believe will be necessary to establish the newcapabilities required to achieve strategic risk management?Genpact Report 9

Infrastructure changes canimprove efficiency andeffectivenessCulture promoting partnershipwith third parties, especiallyregulatorsRetail and corporate banking industries will beBanks will forge a proactive relationship with regulators,transformed, as banks expand services and new eco-as they adjust to new business operations. The emergencesystems are created between customers, banks, andof new types of risk emanating from the marketsthird-party vendors. Banks will offer products tailoredand new ecosystems (fintechs, utilities, third-partyto customers based on price optimization – the rightstakeholders, and so on) will require a closer integrationproduct for the right customer. Risk-adjusted pricing willbetween regulators and bank operations. Regulatorydifferentiate pricing for each customer by incorporating riskreports can be replaced by data-sharing processes, wheremeasured through enhanced probability of default models.multidimensional data is shared with regulators. This canAdditional services, such as cybersecurity and reputationthen be used for drill downs, ML analysis, and what-ifrisk management, will complement risk managementscenarios. Regulators can provide risk insights based on theactivities for the customer.bank’s activities and risks.In addition, a radical change can happen in the relationshipRegulatory costs will be reduced as banks wiring inbetween banks and clients, as services can be offeredcompliance into products and operations. Complianceusing blockchain technologies, where the bank integratescosts will be further reduced as banks deploy 24x7 AI anddigitally into its client operations to offer on-timeML tools to prevent non-compliant actions and automate aadditional services, for example, on-time loan originationnumber of risk functions, such as credit due diligence andusing predictive analytics. Blockchain capabilities, such asportfolio monitoring. Lastly, a holistic view of risk, aidedsmart contracts , could also be used to implement straight-by AI, will enable banks to improve compliance amongthrough processing within banks, accelerating the processregulators and across geographies.4cycle from origination to portfolio monitoring. Finally,the banking platform can be used to provide services tocustomers, such as the ability to connect with other serviceproviders and buy utility services, for example, crossborder foreign exchange.The external ecosystem will become part of future bankoperations and the risk management function. As bankslook to improve risk management performance and reducecosts across the value chain, they will disintermediate anumber of risk functions to fintechs, utilities, and thirdparties. A critical component in creating the ecosystemwill be the migration to cloud technology. Operations inthe cloud enable banks to build models using a digital riskfactory approach, where components are purchased fromthe cloud and integrated into risk operations. Services andcomponents would be sold or purchased in the cloud andthere will be an ecosystem of public and private clouds.Smart contracts are self-executing contracts, with the terms of the contractbetween buyer and seller directly written into lines of code.4Genpact Report 10

Fintechs, utilities, and social media platforms will helpA common theme among survey participants wasbanks create a holistic view of risks across their products,how legacy infrastructure, access to data, and culturecustomers, and markets. Fintechs will provide targetedinhibit improvements in SRM (see figure 8). Theservices, such collections and loss mitigations. Utilitiesoverwhelming change in data management technologieswill provide more generic risk function support, suchand associated processes through the use of RPA, AI,as regulatory compliance and model validation. Thisand infrastructure management technologies, suchwill allow the risk function to focus on higher-value riskas cloud and blockchain, will provide an inflectionmanagement tasks.point in the current linear way of improving SRM. TheThe development of forward-looking capabilities, includingpre-deal analysis, forecasting, stress test scenarios andwhat-ifs execution, is critical for banks. Banks will likelydevelop these in-house or use utilities to provide theservice. Stress testing, which is easily configurable andprovides near-time results, will become available as autility across the value chain.endorsement of these new technologies will acceleratethe implementation of SRM. Banks are currentlyexperimenting with new data and process automationtechnologies, but must implement them within anSRM transformation program to benefit from 4.29%42.86%37.14%30%25.71%20%10%0%Legacy Availability Processesinfraofstructure appropriatetoolsDataPeopleCulture OrganizationalstructureFigure 8: What do you consider as current challenges withrespect to achieving efficiency of existing risk operations (egproduction of MI both internal and regulatory) for the strategicrisk function to be successful? (Please select your top five)Genpact Report 11

Using new technology toimprove market competitivenessEnhancing risk ITWhile banks have started to modernize their ITinfrastructures by adopting new tools and techniques, suchas data lakes, RPA, and ML, and have made small stepstowards migrating to the cloud, a fundamental change willonly occur when they fully endorse the cloud.Cloud functions will change the role of risk IT frommanaging physical estates (large numbers of deliverycenters) to continuously reconfiguring cloud estates(virtual delivery centers). This will enable the risk functionto play the role of decision maker and business advisor.Operations efficiency will come from reduced losses, higherrevenue from customer services, and lower regulatory costs.IT costs will decrease through the timely reconfigurationof the IT estate, while the application development cycle isreduced due to new productivity tools. The deployment ofML and AI tools will improve data quality, which in turnwill improve risk-adjusted return on capital.Survey participants all recognized the role of newtechnologies in digitizing the risk function (see figure 9).Various initiatives have been made to use new technologiesin reporting or other regulatory requirements. Theunderlying driver has been the need to improve datamanagement, which feeds all critical risk managementCloud resources can be easily reconfigured to performdecisions. Some banks are advanced in using RPA, but areML techniques on transactional and historical data, suchstill evaluating new technologies, such as ML. According toas discovering new risk drivers for profitability by usingour survey, the deployment of RPA, ML, or AI is not beinghistorical performance data to discover their impact onexplored systematically, but in an opportunistic way and arisk-adjusted profitability. In a mature cloud market, risk ITreactive mode.will accelerate the development of applications via plug-insfrom the cloud. Developers are fast becoming primarily90%80%assembly engineers for risk models and applications. In70%addition, the nature of the cloud allows risk IT to improve60%its ROI and move into a dynamic ROI. IT infrastructure50%will flex up or down in response to business needs.40%30%“Use AI and move a lot of applications anddata into the cloud This, in conjunctionwith ML, will transform the role of the riskmanagement function.”– CRO, global universal Riskidentification assessment monitoringRiskcontrolRiskreportingFigure 9: Which areas within risk management doyou / would you prioritize for using digital technologies?(Please select all that apply)Genpact Report 12

It is worth noting that there is a drive from the board levelin supply/demand industries. The risk function’s ability toto use new technologies, but with a lens on achieving costbuild a well-integrated team with these characteristics willefficiency as opposed to transforming the role of the riskbe critical in being able to perform a strategic role in themanagement function. Perhaps now is a timely opportunitybank and generate a competitive advantage.to change board perceptions and elevate the role of therisk management function to the strategic direction ofthe organization by significantly improving the valueddelivered, while reducing operational costs.Mobilizing talent and cultureThe risk function of the future will need to expand its skillbase and the role of its risk professionals. It will consist ofdata scientists, model experts, business experts, and userexperience experts, who will use ML, AI, quant analytics,and data visualization to develop risk applications andservices. These professionals will need to endorse a cultureof innovation and experimentation, while being preparedto play portfolio management roles. They will be agile andflexible to work across different risk functions, support anelastic three lines of defence, and feel comfortable beingEighty percent of respondents felt thatnot trying new technology is seen as acompetitive disadvantage.Most survey participants saw culture and skills as the maininhibiitors to improving SRM. This challenge runs acrossthe ERM framework. While technology is seen as a keyenabler, understanding the potential of new technologiesis limited. Business knowledge is considered less criticalthan comprehending new technologies, but there is a lackof understanding of new operating models and attitudes inthe development of risk applications and services, such asagile development or “fail fast” culture. Most participantsagreed that failing to use the new technologies will lead tocompetitive disadvantage (see figure 10).embedded in the business. They will need to think outsideThe current status represents a unique opportunity for thethe box as well as develop new risk services in public/CRO to engage with the board and other stakeholders byprivate clouds, collaborate with fintechs and utilities, orre-imagining the risk function and offering a new vision. Bymigrate techniques and methods from other industries anddeploying new technologies, expanding the skill base, and re-leverage them in the risk function, such as non-SQL DBsorganizing risk operations, the CRO can move into the role ofdecision maker rather than that of controller/trusted 10%0%Reputation riskCompetitive disadvantageRegulatory pressure8.33%2.78%None of the aboveOther (please specify)Figure 10: What are the consequences for your organization of not trying or implementing newtechnology or unsuccessful implementation of strategic risk function? (Please select the top two)Genpact Report 13

Finding the way forwardMoving to a digitized risk function may seem daunting andlong. However, standing still is not an option and a differentapproach to the piecemeal approach taken by most banks isrequired (see figure 11).Piecemeal approach2.78%big bang approach2.78%in a sequential order bybusiness areasCultu

Transforming strategic risk management to realize competitive advantage Advanced digital technologies are having a huge impact on risk functions. In a digital future, the chief risk officer's remit will extend further, while the risk function will encompass both detecting risks and helping define and achieve business strategy.

Related Documents:

1.5 Tactical Risk Decisions and Crisis Management 16 1.5.1 Risk preparation 17 1.5.2 Risk discovery 17 1.5.3 Risk recovery 18 1.6 Strategic Risk Mitigation 19 1.6.1 The value-maximizing level of risk mitigation (risk-neutral) 19 1.6.2 Strategic risk-return trade-o s for risk-averse managers 20 1.6.3 P

The potential benefits of digital risk initiatives include efficiency and productivity gains, enhanced risk effectiveness, and revenue gains. The benefits of Exhibit 1 Digital risk management can significantly reduce losses and fines in core risk areas. Risk 2017 Digital Risk Exhibit 1 of 3 Credit risk Risk areas osses 2015, billion

PART ONE Introduction to Strategic Management and Business Policy 1 CHAPTER1 Basic Concepts of Strategic Management 2 1.1 The Study of Strategic Management 5 Phases of Strategic Management 5 Benefits of Strategic Management 6 1.2 Globalization and Environmental Sustainability: Challenges to Strategic Management 7 Impact of Globalization 8

9-4 Transforming Quadratic Functions9-4 Transforming Quadratic Functions Holt Algebra 1 Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz Holt Algebra 1 9-4 Transforming Quadratic Functions Warm Up For each quadratic function, find the axis of symmetry and vertex, and state whether the function opens upward or downward. 1. y x2 3 2. y 2x2 3. y .

81. Risk Identification, page 29 82. Risk Indicator*, page 30 83. Risk Management Ω, pages 30 84. Risk Management Alternatives Development, page 30 85. Risk Management Cycle, page 30 86. Risk Management Methodology Ω, page 30 87. Risk Management Plan, page 30 88. Risk Management Strategy, pages 31 89. Risk

The Strategic Management Process 15 Developing a Strategic Vision: Stage 1 of the Strategic Management Process: 17 How a Strategic Vision Differs from a Mission Statement 19 The Importance of Communicating the Strategic Vision 22 The Benefits of an Effective Strategic Vision 22 Setting Objectives: Stage 2 of the Strategic Management Process 22 xxiv

Step 1:Enterprise Risk Management The evolution of ERM toward strategic risk management is represented in Figure 2. Strategic risk was missing from the ERM portfolio until 2006. To fix this, based on his then 25 years of LEGO experi-ence and a request from the CFO, Hans Læssøe started looking at strategic risk management.“I was a corporate

Additif très dangereux E249 : Nitrite de potassium . Conservateur chimique. Risques : essoufflements, vertiges, maux de tête, chez les nourrissons les nitrites peuvent provoquer la mort par asphyxie car ils empêchent les globules rouges de transporter l'oxygène, cancérigène. Très répandu dans les charcuteries, les salaisons, le foie gras et le bacon traité, MÊME DANS LES .