Financial Factors That Influence The Performance Of . - Ijssit
http://www.ijssit.comFINANCIAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE PERFORMANCE OFCOOPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN JUJA SUB COUNTY IN KIAMBU, KENYA1*Joyce Wacheke Gacherugacherujoyce2014@gmail.com1, 22**Prof. Willy Muturiwmuturi@jkuat.ac.keJomo Kenyatta University Of Agriculture And Technology, P.O Box 62000-00200 Nairobi, KenyaABSTRACTCooperative societies have been present in Kenya for decades but this sector has not been able to impactpositively on the lives of people. Access to finance has been cited as one of the factors hampering economicgrowth and poverty alleviations. Cooperative societies have lagged behind other financial institutions byperforming below the members’ expectations therefore causing dissatisfaction among the members. The studysought to find out the effect of financial factors on performance of cooperative societies. The objectives thatguided the study were credit policy, investment policy and dividend policy. The population of interest wasdrawn from the cooperative societies registered with the ministry of cooperatives in Juja Sub -county, Kiambu.They were all thirty by number where a sample size of 14 cooperatives was selected. The study employed thedescriptive research design. Secondary data was obtained from the ministry of cooperatives Juja sub-county.Data was analyzed using a regression model with the aid of SPSS and presented on tables and figures .Thedividend policy was found to have a positive influence on Return on Asset and Return On Equity. Investmentdecision also had a positive influence on ROA and ROE. Loan policy measured by the non-performing loanshad a negative influence on both Return on Asset and Return On Equity .The study concludes that since all thevariables were loaded into one factor for each of the variables, this was a good indication that the constructsused in the measurement of all the variables were adequate and they measured the financial performance .Thestudy recommends that managers should be keen on their dividend policy in their firms. The managementshould also consider diversifying their investment portifolios so as to earn more income. Managers to strictlyfollow loan policy to make follow up on defaulted loans so as to improve on performance. The study suggestsfurther studies on effect of internal political influence on performance of cooperatives societies and the effectof non financial factor on performance of cooperatives societies.Keywords: Credit policy, Investment policy, Dividend policy and Performance1.1 IntroductionCooperative sector has been recognized worldwide as important avenues of economic growth. Close to a billionpeople are associated with Cooperatives. Many countries that have achieved economic development have avibrant and dynamic cooperative sector. Kenya has the most vibrant and dynamic cooperative sector in Africa.They range from agriculture, livestock to SACCOS in urban areas (International Cooperative Alliance (ICA),2006). Wacheke, Muturi667
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 2018Cooperatives perform active financial intermediation function mediating from urban to semi urban to ruralareas. They play the same role as commercial banks. Commercial banks have continued to grow day by dayfor example Equity bank was formed in 1984 as a simple Building society. It later transformed into a powerfulmicro finance and now a commercial bank that have even crossed border to offer services to neighboringcountries,(Equity ,2016).On the other hand the cooperative sector despite being there for long theirperformance cannot be compared with that of commercial banks (Miriti, 2014).The impact of cooperative in the world economy is both extensive and impressive. It is estimated that there areover 800 million people globally who are members of cooperatives and 100 million people are employed bycooperatives. In nearly all developing countries they are the main contributors of economic growth. Europehas 58000 cooperatives with membership of 13.8 million. In the US there are 72,000 cooperative societies withover 140 million members. Mwangi & Wambua (2016). In Brazil there are more than 6,800 cooperativesdistributed over13 business segments. The cooperatives are faced with competition from other sectors.However they seek to exercise their role of development and still offer their members condition to grow,International Summit of Cooperatives report (2016). In Nigeria the number of registered cooperative societieshas grown from 108 from 1967 to 15000 in 2016.This is according to midyear report of the CooperativeDepartment for year 2016.However though a lot of people have heard about the Cooperatives it is just a fewthat are exploring the enormous opportunities they present. When wholly utilized cooperatives can boost jobcreation as well as national productivity, (A.Lolande, 2016).There are over 9000 cooperative societies in Canada which are widely supported by 83% of Canadians. Theyhave 18 million members and they employ more than 150,000 people and are the major players in many sectors,Ministry of Cooperatives report (2016).In Tanzania, Cooperatives draw membership from the local community or a similar employer (Klinkhamer2009). Their members share a geographical area, a community, an employer or other affiliations (CGAP,2005). The members are the sole beneficiaries, sole savers and sole decision-makers (Mwakajumilo 2011).The Cooperatives funds emanate from members saving deposits (Shrestha 2009). Cooperatives membersregistered high increases of incomes, assets, food consumption, education expenditure, improved housing anddecline of health expenditures compared to non-members (Sharma et al 2005). However, many co-operativesand SACCOs in Tanzania face problems of poor management, embezzlement, lack of working capital, poorbusiness practice and high loan delinquency rates (Maghimbi 2010; Mwakajumulo 2011).In Kenya the first cooperative society was Lumbwa Cooperative Society formed in 1908 by European farmerswith the main objective of supporting agricultural activities and products to take advantage of economies ofscale (KUSCCO, 2006).The Co-operative movement in Kenya is an important player in the social economic development of thiscountry. Cooperatives cut across all sectors of the economy and provide an important framework formobilization of both human and capital resources (Ministry of Co-operative Development and Marketing,2008). Cooperative societies in Kenya are divided into two. Saving and credit cooperatives (SACCOs) andseveral types based on objective and purpose eg. transport, investment, Housing, etc. Presently the cooperativesector in Kenya boasts of over 20,000 registered cooperatives with membership of over 12 million people(Ernst and Young Global Company limited report, 2017).The cooperatives have employed over 300,000 people besides providing opportunities for self-employment.Indeed, a significant number of Kenyans, approximately 63% draw their livelihood either directly or indirectly Wacheke, Muturi668
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 2018from cooperative-based enterprises (Republic of Kenya 2007; International Monetary Fund 2007; The KenyaHigh Commission in the United Kingdom 2007). There are 256 Cooperative Societies that are registered withMinistry of Cooperative in Kiambu County. Out of this 30 Cooperatives are registered under Juja Sub County.(Ministry of Cooperatives Kiambu County, 2015).1.2 Statement of the problem.Although Cooperatives Societies have been present in Kenya for the last 109 years they have not been able toperform well as compared to the other mainstream financial institutions like commercial banks (Miriti ,2014).In order to make them perform well it is crucial to understand the determinants of the financial performancethus ensure sustainability of the Co-operative movement in Kenya (Mundia,2016). Mwangi and Wambua,(2016 ), established the following factors that influence the performance of Saccos:- poor governance, delayedloan processing, Some pay little or no dividends on shares and as compared to other financial institutionsmembers queue for long to receive FOSA services. Their study concluded that organization subculture and theorganization structure has a significant effect on financial performance of saccos. Mvula (2013) presented areport on common issues affecting performance of SACCOs in Malawi concluded that the issues affectingperformance of SACCOs are inadequate capital, poor asset quality, poor governance, poor profitability, poorliquidity and noncompliance.On the other hand Mudibo, (2005) identified some of the factors affecting performance of SACCOs as weakregulation, limited product and services, low marketing and poor image.Makori,J., Munene,C. and Muturi W. 2013,did a study on challenges facing deposit taking saccos in Kenyaand concluded that many SACCOSs has challenges in regulatory compliance, credit management, liquidity,ICT, Governance and investment policy .Miriti (2014), identified only credit policy as the main factor that influence financial performance ofcooperatives. Black and Schore, 2000 on their study on effect of dividend policy on stock prices concludedthat we cannot tell the effect a change in dividend policy will have on stock prices.Few studies exist on financial factors that affect performance of cooperatives hence this study seek to establishfinancial factors that affect performance of cooperative Societies.1.3 Research objective.The general objective of the study will be to establish the financial factors that influence the performance ofcooperative Societies in Juja Sub County in Kiambu Kenya.1.3.1 Specific objective.1. To determine whether credit policy has an effect on financial performance of the cooperative societiesin Juja Sub county Kiambu.2. To determine whether Dividend policy affect financial performance of the cooperative societies in JujaSub county Kiambu.3. To assess the influence of investment policy on financial performance of the cooperative societies inJuja Sub county Kiambu.1.4 Research questions. Wacheke, Muturi669
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 20181. What is the influence of credit policy on financial performance of cooperative societies in Juja Subcounty Kiambu?2. What is the influence of dividend policy on financial performance of cooperative societies in Juja Subcounty Kiambu?3. What is the influence of investment policy adopted by various Cooperative Societies Juja Sub Countyin Kiambu on their financial performance?.2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW2.1 Theoretical framework2.1.1 Dividend Irrelevance TheoryMuch like their work on the capital-structure irrelevance proposition, Modigliani and Miller also theorizedthat, with no taxes or bankruptcy costs, dividend policy is also irrelevant. This is known as the "dividendirrelevance theory", indicating that there is no effect from dividends on a company's capital structure or stockprice. MM's dividend-irrelevance theory says that investors can affect their return on a stock regardless of thestock's dividend. For example, suppose, from an investor's perspective, that a company's dividend is too big.That investor could then buy more stock with the dividend that is over the investor's expectations. Likewise,if, from an investor's perspective, a company's dividend is too small, an investor could sell some of thecompany's stock to replicate the cash flow he or she expected. As such, the dividend is irrelevant to investors,meaning investors care little about a company's dividend policy.2.1. 2 The bird-in-the-hand theoryThe bird-in-the-hand theory, however, states that dividends are relevant and that total return (k) is equal todividend yield plus capital gains. Myron Gordon and John Lintner (Gordon/Litner) took this equation andassumed that k would decrease as a company's payout increased. As such, as a company increases its payoutratio, investors become concerned that the company's future capital gains will dissipate since the nesswillbeless.M.Gordon and J. Lintner argued that investors value dividends more than capital gains when making decisionsrelated to stocks. The bird-in-the-hand may sound familiar as it is taken from an old saying: "a bird in the handis worth two in the bush." In this theory "the bird in the hand' is referring to dividends and "the bush" is referringto capital gains.2.1.3 Modern Portfolio TheoryThis theory was developed by Markowitz (1952). In investment; modern portfolio theory management is acritical theory. It tries to look for the most efficient combinations of assets to maximize portfolio expectedreturns for given level of risk. Alternatively, minimize risk for a given level of expected return. Portfolio theoryis presented in a mathematical formulation and clearly gives the idea of diversifying the assets investmentcombination with a purpose of selecting those assets that will collectively lower the risk than any single asset.In the theory, it clearly identifies this combination is made possible when the individual assets return andmovement is opposite direction. An investor therefore needs to study the value movement of the intended assetinvestment and find out which assets have an opposite movement. However, risk diversification lowers thelevel of risk even if the assets’ returns are not negatively or positively correlated (Omisore et al., 2012). Wacheke, Muturi670
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 2018The major assumptions in portfolio theory in managing risk are that the investors are rational and the marketis efficient and perfect (Chijoriga, 2007). This theory addresses the investments policies variable. The modernportfolio theory demonstrates that organizations manage their businesses on a portfolio basis. Withassumptions that investors are homogenous and risk averse, they have to be motivated to invest, they need arate of return that will compensate them for taking on the risk at the end of period of holding given asset(s). Itis therefore important for SACCOs to deploy prudent financial management practices in order to instill controlwithin the various portfolios with a target of maximizing returns on each portfolio.2.2 Conceptual frameworkIndependent variablesDependent variableDividend policy Rate of dividends paid.Dividend payout.Credit policy Non-performing loansPerformance of cooperatives inKenya Return on assets RatiosReturn on Equity RatiosInvestment Policy Investment in securitiesFigure 2.1: Conceptual Framework2.3 Empirical review2.3.1 Performance of Cooperatives.A quantitative measure of an entity’s performance not expressed in monetary units is referred to as a nonfinancial performance. Some of these may include; number of new products, customer satisfaction, and qualityin service, loan disbursements, growth, continuity, stability of the firm among many others. Financial measuresshow the impact of the firm’s policies and procedures on the firm’s current financial position and its currentreturn on shareholders’ whereas non-financial factors show the firms current and potential competitiveposition. By supplementing accounting measures with non-financial data about strategic performance andimplementation of strategic plans, companies can communicate objectives and provide incentives for managersto address long-term strategy. Non-financial performance has to be measured alongside other performanceindicators and clearly stated in financial statements (Friends consult Ltd).The payment of dividends by firms has different impact according to the various performance indicators. Theuse and usefulness of non-performance measures to determine the extent to which firms combine financial,nonfinancial and subjective performance measures and that every kind of measure affects a firms operationsdifferently (Chow & Stede, 2006). Non-financial measures have the advantages over measurement systemsbased on financial data. It gives a link to long-term organizational strategies. Financial evaluation systems Wacheke, Muturi671
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 2018generally focus on annual or short-term performance against accounting yardsticks. They do not deal withprogress relative to customer requirements or competitors, or other non-financial objectives that may beimportant in achieving profitability, competitive strength and longer-term strategic goals. Also, non-financialdata can provide indirect, quantitative indicators of a firm's intangible asset. Some of the performancedeterminants are, Asset growth rates ratio, Liquidity ratio, Return on assets, Return on equity (Molla 2015).2.3.3 Dividend policyUwuigbe and Ajayi (2012) conducted a study on dividend policy and firms performance a study of listed firmsin Nigeria .They used regression analysis method for analyzing data and which was from the annual report ofthe companies they found out that there is a significant positive association between the performance of thefirms and dividend payout.Priya and Mohnasundari (2016), on their study on dividends policy and its impact on firms value found outthat the research can be categorized into two different schools of thought. The first is that dividend policy of afirm has an impact on the firm’s value and the other one is that dividend policy has no impact on the value ofthe firm.Miller & Modigliani (1961) argued that under certain simplifying assumptions, the dividend decision does notaffect the value of a firm and is, hence, unimportant. Yet, traditional wisdom with changed postulationsadvocates that a properly managed dividend policy is vital to shareholders because it can affect share pricesand shareholder's wealth.According to Kapoor (2009), Stakeholders know with certainty that firms which pay dividends have a higherfirm value as opposed to the ones that do not pay dividends. Dividend payout depends on the dividend policiesembraced by different firms.Dividend policy is also likely to be influenced by the performance of Cooperatives. This is a very importantfactor in measuring the cooperatives performance. The behavior of dividend policy is one most debatable issuein the corporate finance literature and still keeps its prominent place both in developed and emerging markets(Hafeez & Attiya, 2009).Dividend policy has been analyzed for many decades, but no universally accepted explanation for companies’observed dividend behavior has been established. It has long been a puzzle in corporate finance. (Samuel &Edward, 2011)Dividend policy enables firms to know how much to be distributed to the stakeholders or retained by the firmfor other investment purposes of the firm (Mundia,2016).2.3.3 Credit policyMiriti ,2014 on his study on factors influencing financial performance of cooperative societies revealed thatdefaulting on loan payment is a serious offence and should be avoided at all cost. Most of the time defaultingon payments is temporary in nature caused by clients loss of jobs, a temporary extra expenditure that left nomoney to make the pay or prolonged illness which may cause the client financial distress or keep him inhospital for few months.Yashwant (2014) was particularly concerned about the mounting non-performing assets in the corporatelending segment as compared to other sectors. He noted that a number of finance institutions have been Wacheke, Muturi672
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 2018attributed to have managerial failures because of their inability to arrest the rising non-performing assets. Thestudy concluded that solution to this can be restructuring, where the terms of the loan are eased up andborrowers get more time to get his house in order.A research by Linda Gatakaa (2014) on relationship between loan policy and financial performance ofcommercial banks in Kenya found out that the provision for bad and doubtful debts was positively related tothe financial performance of the Kenyan commercial banks. Declining loan default rate significantly enhancedthe financial performance of the Kenyan commercial banks. Collateral significantly enhanced the financialperformance of the Kenyan commercial banks. There is a positive relationship between loan policy andfinancial performance of the Kenyan commercial banks.Another related study was done by Otieno M. (2012), on effect of lending policies on levels of non perfomingloans of commercial banks in Kenya. He gathered only primary data using questionnaires. The study foundthat lending policies and non-performing loans are indeed related. Lending policies helps the banks lendprudently and lowers the risk level to the banks, and strict adherence to lending policies therefore has led toreduced non-performing loans.2.3.4 Investment policyA study by Makori, Munene and Muturi (2013), on the challenges facing SACCOs in Gusii region in Kenyarevealed that the high investment in none, earning investments and inadequate managerial competencecontributed to the failure of SACCOs in Kenya. The study had used structured questionnaires, interview andfocused discussion with selected persons to collect data. In another study by Olando, Jagongo and Mbewa(2013) on the contribution of financial stewardship to the growth of SACCOs in Kenya indicated that SACCOsdid not adequately cover their costs on investments undertaken.Muchemi (2005), noted that non profitable investments should be discouraged because, despite the enormousamount of resources input in such projects, returns are almost nil, hence reducing the capital base where interestis drawn from.Hesse & Cihak (2007), found that co-operative financial institutions tend to be more stable in times of crisis,as their investment patterns use the capital of members in ways that best serve their long term needs andinterests. They have a lesser tendency to invest in high risk financial markets when compared to other formsof commercial banks. It is therefore thought that their comparative stability, under both average andextraordinary conditions, can help to mitigate crisis impact for members and clientele, especially in the shortterm.Machuki (2011) did a study on the Effect of Investment Decision on the performance of firms listed in theNairobi Securities Exchange. The target population of the study as at 31st December 2013 was all the61companies listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, under the main segment. The study adopted a censusapproach because of the small number of non-financial companies in the NSE. Both descriptive and inferentialstatistics were used in data analysis. The study utilized panel data which consisted of time series and crosssections. Results revealed good, significant and positive correlations between ROA and all the predictorvariables, that is., Investment Decision, Financial Leverage and Liquidity. Wacheke, Muturi673
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 20183.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGYDescriptive research design was used in this study this is because according to Mugenda and Mugenda,2003,it gives information as it is in the field. It tries to answer the questions like why, when, who and where. Anotherreason why the design was used is that the researcher is able to acquire factual, accurate and systematic datathat can be used in averages, frequencies and similar statistical calculations. The target population was drawnfrom the Cooperative societies that are registered with the ministry of cooperatives Juja Sub County. There are30 cooperative societies which are registered with the Ministry of Cooperative Juja Sub County. Simplerandom sampling was used where a sample size of 14 cooperatives within Juja Sub County was selected. Alist of all cooperatives within Juja Sub County is attached.The secondary data collected involved the previous works from related articles including published FinancialReports from the Cooperatives and data related to those Cooperatives available with the Ministry ofCooperatives Juja Sub County annual reports on their performance. This was the most viable sources availableand only secondary sources such as those mentioned above could suffice for the analysis by virtue of the natureof the variables. The data was further collected and organized using a data collection schedule.This research applied the content validity test method. Cooper and Schindler (2008), noted that content validityof a measuring instrument is the extent to which it provides adequate coverage of the investigative questionsguiding the study. They asserted further that if the instrument contains a representative sample of the universeof subject matter, the content validity is good. They concluded that determination of content validity involvesjudgment which may involve a panel of persons who then judge how well the instrument meets the standards.Data collected was analyzed and presented by use of tables and the use of summarized percentages andproportions. Data was first subjected to a sequence of operations which includes editing, coding, classificationand analysis using statistical package for social science(SPSS). Analysis was done through descriptive statisticssuch as percentages, averages and inferential statistics.Other inferential statistics such as, Analysis of Variance, correlation analysis and multiple regression wereused to elaborate the study further. The following regression model was estimated.The Multiple Regression Model below was used to analyze the dataY β0 β1 X1 β2 X2 β3 X3 εWhere:Y SACCOs performance𝛽0 Intercept term, 𝛽𝑖 Are the various coefficients of the Independent Variables𝑋1 Divided policy𝑋2 Credit policy𝑋3 Investment policy; 𝜀 error term Wacheke, Muturi674
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 20184.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION4.1 Descriptive statisticsData used for this study was secondary data derived from Ministry of cooperatives offices the data provided100%4.1.1 Investment policyThe study sought to establish the distribution of funds invested in securities. The variable was measured byamount invested in securities.Table 4.1 Investment in 670.2354Investment in securities was highest in 2015 with a mean of 15.357 and declined in 2014 where the mean was11.317. Table 4.1 indicates that there has been an upward trend in investment in securities from 2014 with amean of 11.317 to 2015 with a mean of 15.357.4.1.2 Credit policyThe study sought to establish the distribution loan policy. The variable was measured by non-performing loansagainst the loans advanced.Table 4.2 Credit policy (non-performing 3245Skewness0.03490.03910.04520.06730.0454The level of non-performing loans was highest in 2013 with a mean of 0.546.And lowest in 2011 with a meanof 0.435. There is an indication from the analysis that non-performing loans have been rising from 2013 to2015 with a mean of 0.534.4.1.3 Dividend PolicyThe study sought to establish the distribution of dividend policy. The variable was measured by amount inKenya shillings paid out per every share held by the members from 2011-2015. Wacheke, Muturi675
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 2018Table 4.3 Dividend policy (dividends paid .2487Skewness0.020.040.050.050.05The amount paid out per share on average was highest in 2011 with a mean of 0.2814and the lowest was in2012 where the mean was 0.1712.4.1.4 Return on Assets (ROA)The study sought to establish the distribution of return on assets. The variable was measured by by the ratio ofnet income over total assets converted into percentage.Table 4.4 Return on .03420.14120112.10.01230.172The mean value of return on assets was highest in 2015 with a mean of 2.7%. and lowest in 2011 with a meanvalue of 2.1%.4.1.5 Return on Equity (ROE)The study sought to establish the distribution of return on equity. The variable was measured by net incomeper shareholder’s fund.Table 4.5 Return on EquityYear20152014201320122011Mean .023The amount of return on equity was highest in 2011 with a mean of 13.72 and lowest amount was in 2015where the mean was 11.12. ROE had higher percentage values than ROA on all the years under study. Wacheke, Muturi676
International Journal of Social Sciences and Information TechnologyISSN 2412-0294Vol IV Issue X, October 20184.2 Correlation MatrixTable 4.6 Correlation matrixPerformancePerformance Dividedpolicy10.707**PearsonCorrelationSig. (2-tailed)0.000N7474**Divided policy Pearson0.7071CorrelationSig. (2-tailed) 0.000N7474**Credit policyPearson0.7740.569**CorrelationSig. (2-tailed) cyCorrelationSig. (2-tailed) 0.0000.000N7474**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).Credit 4**0.0007474From table 4.6 it can be observed that the correlation between the independent variables and the dependentvariable was high and positive at 0.707, 0.774 and 0.745 for divided poli
The general objective of the study will be to establish the financial factors that influence the performance of cooperative Societies in Juja Sub County in Kiambu Kenya. 1.3.1 Specific objective. 1. To determine whether credit policy has an effect on financial performance of the cooperative societies
May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)
Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .
On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.
̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions
Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have
Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được
Food outlets which focused on food quality, Service quality, environment and price factors, are thè valuable factors for food outlets to increase thè satisfaction level of customers and it will create a positive impact through word ofmouth. Keyword : Customer satisfaction, food quality, Service quality, physical environment off ood outlets .
IAS 36 – LỖ TỔN THẤT TÀI SẢN. xxx KHÔNG áp dụngcho Ápdụngcho x Hàng tồnkho (IAS 2) x . Tài sản tài chính (IFRS 9) x . Quyền lợi người lao động (IAS 19) x . Tài sản thuế hoãn lại (IAS 12) x . Hợp đồng xây dựng (IAS 11) x . Bất động s
