Recommendation For Closure Navy And Marine Corps Reserve Centers .
DCN: 1607Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIARECOMMENDATION FOR CLOSURENAVY AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTERSRecommendation:Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Encino, CA and relocate the MarineCorps units to Marine Corps Reserve Center Pasadena, CA.Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Moundsville, WV and relocate theMarine Corps units to Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Pittsburgh, PA.Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Reading, PA and relocate the Navy andMarine Corps units to Navy Marine Corps Reserve Centers Lehigh Valley, PA.Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Los Angeles, CA and relocate the Navyand Marine Corps units to Armed Forces Reserve Center Bell, CA.Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Akron, OH and Navy Reserve CenterCleveland, OH and relocate the Navy and Marine Corps units to Armed ForcesReserve Center Akron, OH.Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Madison, WI, Navy Reserve CenterLacrosse, WI and Navy Reserve Center Dubuque, IA and relocate the Navy andMarine Corps units to Armed Forces Reserve Center Madison, WI.Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Baton Rouge, LA and relocate theMarine Corps units to Armed Forces Reserve Center Baton Rouge, LA.Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Tulsa, Ok and relocate the Navy andMarine Corps units to Armed Forces Reserve Center Broken Arrow, OK.Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Mobile, AL and relocate the MarineCorps units to Armed Forces Reserve Center Mobile, AL.Close Inspector-Instructor West Trenton, NJ and relocate Marine Corps reserveunits and support staff to Navy Reserve Center Ft. Dix, NJ.Close Inspector-Instructor Rome, GA, and relocate Marine Corps reserve units andsupport staff to Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Atlanta, GA.Justification: This recommendation will reduce excess capacity through theconsolidation of 12 Navy Reserve Centers and Navy Marine Corps ReserveCenters with other reserve centers in the effected areas or into Armed Forces1Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIAReserve Centers. Nine of 12 of the reserve center closures are joint actions withthe Department of the Army that support relocation into Armed Forces ReserveCenters. This recommendation will also relocate two Inspector-Instructoractivities to existing reserve facilities aboard active duty bases. Sufficient capacityfor drilling reserves is maintained throughout the United States, and all states willcontinue to have at least one Navy/Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center. Thisrecommendation reduces excess capacity in the Department of the Navy reservecenter functional area, but existing capacity in support of the Department of theNavy Reserve component continues to be in excess of force structurerequirements. This recommendation is part of the closure of 37 Department of theNavy reserve centers, which includes 35 Navy centers (Navy Reserve Centers,Navy Reserve Facilities and Navy Marine Corps Reserve Centers) and two MarineCorps centers (Inspector-Instructor activities). The closure of 35 Navy centerswill result in a capacity reduction of 12.7 percent of total current square footage.The closure of two Marine Corps centers will result in a capacity reduction of 5.5percent of total current square footage.Payback: The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense toimplement the closure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Encino, CA is 0.1million. The net of all costs and savings during the implementation period is asavings of 4.56 million. Annual recurring savings to the Department afterimplementation are 0.83 million with an immediate payback. The net presentvalue of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savings of 12.31 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Moundsvillle, WV is 0.24 million.The net of all costs and savings to the Department during the implementationperiod is a savings of 4.67 million. Annual recurring savings to the Departmentafter implementation are 0.89 million with an immediate payback. The netpresent val ue of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savingsof 13.01 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Reading, PA is 9.10 million. Thenet of all costs and savings to the Department during the implementation period isa cost of 5.03 million. Annual recurring savings to the Department afterimplementation are 0.96 million with a payback expected in 12 years. The netpresent value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savingsof 4.14 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Los Angeles, CA is 12.20 million.2Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIAThe net of all costs and savings to the Department during the implementationperiod is a cost of 8.02 million. Annual recurring savings to the Department afterimplementation are 0.85 million with a payback expected in 18 years. The netpresent value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savingsof 0.470 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Akron, OH and Navy ReserveCenter Cleveland, OH is 11.77 million. The net of all costs and savings to theDepartment during the implementation period is a cost of 4.21 million. Annualrecurring savings to the Department after implementation are 1.66 million with apayback expected in 7 years. The net present value of the costs and savings to theDepartment over 20 years is a savings of 11.84 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Madison, WI and Navy ReserveCenter Lacrosse, WI and Navy Reserve Center Dubuque, IA is 10.21 million.The net of all costs and savings during the implementation period is a cost of 3.69 million. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementationare 1.78 million with a payback expected in 6 years. The net present value of thecosts and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savings of 13.56 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Baton Rouge, LA is 3.89 million.The net of all costs and savings to the Department during the implementationperiod is a savings of 0.93 million. Annual recurring savings to the Departmentafter implementation are 0.97 million with a payback expected in 3 years. Thenet present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is asavings of 10.23 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Tulsa, OK is 5.53 million. Thenet of all costs and savings to the Department during the implementation period isa cost of 3.70 million. Annual recurring savings to the Department afterimplementation are 0.49 million with a payback expected in 14 years. The netpresent value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savingsof 1.13 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Mobile, AL is 7.97 million. Thenet of all costs and savings to the Department during the implementation period isa cost of 4.60 million. Annual recurring savings to the Department afterimplementation are 0.71 million with a payback expected in 12 years. The net3Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIApresent value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savingsof 2.37 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Inspector-Instructor West Trenton, NJ is 1.33 million. The net of allcosts and savings to the Department during the implementation period is a savingsof 1.36 million. Annual recurring savings to the Department after theimplementation period are 0.48 million with a payback expected in 3 years. Thenet present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is asavings of 5.89 million.The total estimated one time cost to the Department of Defense to implement theclosure of Inspector-Instructor Rome, GA is 0.05 million. The net of all costsand savings to the Department during the implementation period is a savings of 0.64 million. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementationare 0.14 million with an immediate payback. The net present value of the costsand savings to the Department over 20 years is a savings of 1.92 million.Economic Impact on Communities: Assuming no economic recovery, theclosure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Encino, CA will result in amaximum potential reduction of 12 jobs (8 direct jobs and 4 indirect jobs) over the2006-2011 period in the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA MetropolitanStatistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.Assuming no economic recovery, the closure of Navy Marine Corps ReserveCenter Moundsville, WV will result in a maximum potential reduction of 21 jobs(16 direct jobs and 5 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Wheeling,WV-OH Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economicarea employment.Assuming no economic recovery, the closure of Navy Marine Corps ReserveCenter Reading, PA could result in a maximum potential reduction of 25 jobs (18direct jobs and 7 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Reading, PAMetropolitan Statistical Ar ea, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic areaemployment.The closure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Los Angeles, CA will notresult in any job reductions (direct or indirect) over the 2006-2011 period in theLos Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA, Metropolitan Division. Navy MarineCorps Reserve Center Los Angeles and Armed Forces Reserve Center Bell are inthe same Metropolitan Division.4Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIAAssuming no economic recovery, the closure of Navy Marine Corps ReserveCenter Akron, OH and Navy Reserve Center Cleveland, OH will result in amaximum potential reduction of 34 jobs (25 direct jobs and 9 indirect jobs) overthe 2006-2011 period in Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH, Metropolitan StatisticalArea, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment. Navy MarineCorps Reserve Center Akron and Armed Forces Reserve Center Akron are in thesame Metropolitan Statistical Area.Assuming no economic recovery, the closure of Navy Marine Corps ReserveCenter Madison, WI, and Navy Reserve Center Lacrosse, WI and Navy ReserveCenter Dubuque, IA will result in a maximum potential reduction of 9 jobs (7direct jobs and 2 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the LaCrosse, WIMN, Metropolitan Statistical Area, which less than 0.1 percent of economic areaemployment.Assuming no economic recovery, the closure of Navy Marine Corps ReserveCenter Madison, WI, and Navy Reserve Center Lacrosse, WI and Navy ReserveCenter Dubuque, IA will result in a maximum potential reduction of 32 jobs (24direct jobs and 8 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Dubuque, IA,Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic areaemployment. Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Madison and Armed ForcesReserve Center Madison are in the same Metropolitan Statistical Area.Assuming no economic recovery, the closure of Navy Marine Corps ReserveCenter Baton Rouge, LA will result in a maximum potential reduction of 10 jobs(7 direct jobs and 3 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Baton Rouge,LA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic areaemployment.The closure of Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Tulsa, OK will not result inany job reductions (direct or indirect) over the 2006-2011 period in the Tulsa, OK,Metropolitan Statistical Area. Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Tulsa andArmed Forces Reserve Center Broken Arrow are in the same MetropolitanStatistical Area.Assuming no economic recovery, the closure of Navy Marine Corps ReserveCenter Mobile, AL will result in a maximum potential reduction of 7 jobs (5 directjobs and 2 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Mobile, ALMetropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic areaemployment. Navy Marine Corps Reserve Centers Mobile and Armed ForcesReserve Center Mobile are in the same Metropolitan Statistical Area.5Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIAAssuming no economic recovery, the closure of Inspector-Instructor WestTrenton, NJ could result in a maximum potential reduction of 16 jobs (12 directjobs and 4 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Trenton-Ewing, NJMetropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic areaemployment.Assuming no economic recovery, the closure of Inspector-Instructor Rome, GAcould result in a maximum potential reduction of 12 jobs (9 direct jobs and 3indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Rome, GA Metropolitan StatisticalArea, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.The aggregate economic impact of all recommended actions on these economicregions of influence was considered and is at Appendix B of Volume I.Community Infrastructure: A review of community attributes indicates noissues regarding the ability of the infrastructure of the communities to supportmissions, forces, and personnel. There are no known community infrastructureimpediments to implementation of all recommendations affecting the installationsin this recommendation.Environmental Impact: This recommendation has no impact on air quality;cultural, archeological, or tribal resources; dredging; land use constraints orsensitive resource areas; marine mammals, resources, or sanctuaries; noise;threatened or endangered species or critical habitat; waste management; waterresources; or wetlands. This recommendation indicates impacts of costs at theinstallations involved, which reported 135 thousand in costs for environmentalcompliance activities. These costs were included in the payback calculation. Thisrecommendation does not otherwise impact the costs of environmental restoration,waste management, or environmental compliance activities. The aggregateenvironmental impact of all recommended BRAC actions affecting theinstallations in this recommendation has been reviewed. There are no knownenvironmental impediments to implementation of this recommendation.6Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIAAttachments:Supporting InformationCOBRA ReportEconomic Impact Report(s)Installation Criterion 7 Profile(s)Summary of Scenario Environmental Impacts Report7Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIASupporting Information:Military Value Analysis:RESERVE CENTER MILVAL - NRC & 425262728293031DoN InstallationNAVMARCORESCEN DENVER CONAVMARCORESCEN LAS VEGAS NVNAVMARCORESCEN COLUMBUS OHNAVMARCORESCEN ATLANTA GANAVMARCORESCEN SAN ANTONIO TXNAVMARCORESCEN JACKSONVILLE FLNAVMARCORESCEN ROCK ISLAND ILNAVRESCEN OKLAHOMA CITY OKNAVMARCORESCEN GREENVILLE SCNAVMARCORESCEN WASHINGTON DCNAVRESCEN FT CARSON CONAVMARCORESCEN NORFOLK VANAVMARCORESCEN LITTLE ROCK ARNAVRESCEN FT DIX NJNAVRESCEN EVERETT WANAVRESCEN FORT WORTH TXNAVRESCEN LEMOORE CANAVMARCORESCEN ALBUQUERQUE NMNAVMARCORESCEN SACRAMENTO CANAVRESCEN ST LOUIS MONAVRESCEN CORPUS CHRISTI TXNAVRESCEN PENSACOLA FLNAVRESCEN FARGO NDNAVMARCORESCEN SALT LAKE CITY UTNAVMARCORESCEN TUCSON AZNAVMARCORESCEN GREENSBORO NCNAVMARCORESCEN PHOENIX AZNAVRESCEN EARLE NJNAVMARCORESCEN MINNEAPOLIS MNNAVRESCEN WICHITA KSNAVMARCORESCEN TACOMA erative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under 555657585960616263646566676869707172NAVRESCEN TAMPA FLNAVRESCEN CHICAGO ILNAVMARCORESCEN CHARLOTTE NCNAVMARCORESCEN ALAMEDA CANAVRESCEN SYRACUSE NYNAVMARCORESCEN MIAMI FLNAVRESCEN QUINCY MANAVMARCORESCEN BATTLE CREEK MINAVRESCEN MEMPHIS TNNAVMARCORESCEN PORTLAND ORNAVRESCEN MERIDIAN MSNAVMARCORESCEN GULFPORT MSNAVRESCEN DETROIT MINAVRESCEN BALTIMORE MDNAVMARCORESCEN YOUNGSTOWN OHNAVMARCORESCEN RICHMOND VANAVMARCORESCEN SAN DIEGO CANAVMARCORESCEN AMARILLO TXNAVRESCEN COLUMBIA SCNAVMARCORESCEN MORENO VALLEY CANAVMARCORESCEN HOUSTON TXNAVMARCORESCEN HARRISBURG PANAVRESCEN ST PETERBURG FLNAVRESCEN CLEVELAND OHNAVMARCORESCEN TU LSA OKNAVRESCEN FOREST PARK ILNAVMARCORESCEN ENCINO CANAVMARCORESCEN BOISE IDNAVMARCORESCEN MANCHESTER NHNAVMARCORESCEN GREEN BAY WINAVMARCORESCEN LOS ANGELES CANAVMARCORESCEN BATON ROUGE LANAVMARCORESCEN BESSEMER ALNAVMARCORESCEN CHATTANOOGA TNNAVRESCEN SIOUX CITY IANAVMARCORESCEN OMAHA NENAVRESCEN FT RICHARDSON AKNAVMARCORESCEN ALBANY NYNAVRESCEN SILVERDALE WANAVMARCORESCEN ORLANDO FLNAVMARCORESCEN KNOXVILLE 60.560.560.360.19Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under NAVMARCORESCEN AMITYVILLE NYNAVMARCORESCEN LEHIGH VALLEY PANAVMARCORESCEN WACO TXNAVRESCEN LOUISVILLE KYNAVRESCEN BRONX NYNAVMARCORESCEN TOLEDO OHNAVMARCORESCEN DES MOINES IANAVMARCORESCEN PROVIDENCE RINAVMARCORESCEN SPOKANE WANAVMARCORESCEN RENO NVNAVRESCEN AVOCA PANAVRESCEN ORANGE TXNAVMARCORESCEN INDIANAPOLIS INNAVMARCORESCEN GRAND RAPIDS MINAVMARCORESCEN CINCINNATI OHNAVMARCORESCEN AKRON OHNAVMARCORESCEN SHREVEPORT LANAVMARCORESCEN EL PASO TXNAVMARCORESCEN AUSTIN TXNAVRESCEN DECATUR ILNAVRESFAC MARQUETTE MINAVMARCORESCEN ROANOKE VANAVRESCEN LINCOLN NENAVRESCEN CHARLESTON SCNAVMARCORESCEN WORCHESTER MANAVMARCORESCEN EBENSBURG PANAVRESCEN SAGINAW MINAVRESCEN WATERTOWN NYNAVMARCORESCEN RALEIGH NCNAVRESCEN HONOLULU HINAVMARCORESCEN BUFFALO NYNAVMARCORESCEN WEST PALM BEACH FLNAVMARCORESCEN ROCHESTER NYNAVMARCORESCEN MADISON WINAVRESCEN NEW ORLEANS LANAVRESCEN LUBBOCK TXNAVRESCEN DUBUQUE IANAVMARCORESCEN LANSING MINAVMARCORESCEN MOBILE ALNAVRESCEN SIOUX FALLS SDNAVMARCORESCEN NEW HAVEN 55.255.155.054.610Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under 146147148149150151152NAVRESCEN BANGOR MENAVRESCEN EVANSVILLE INNAVMARCORESCEN SPRINGFIELD MONAVMARCORESCEN WILMINGTON DENAVRESCEN PORT HUENEME CANAVRESCEN LEXINGTON KYNAVRESCEN NASHVILLE TNNAVMARCORESCEN GRISSOM ARB INNAVRESCEN DULUTH MNNAVMARCORESCEN MOUNDSVILLE WVNAVRESCEN ADELPHI MDNAVMARCORESCEN EUGENE ORNAVRESCEN KANSAS CITY KSNAVMARCORESCEN TALLAHASSEE FLNAVRESCEN WILMINGTON NCNAVMARCORESCEN PLAINVILLE CTNAVMARCORESCEN PEORIA ILNAVMARCORESCEN ERIE PANAVRESCEN SAN JOSE CANAVRESCEN HELENA MTNAVRESCEN CHEYENNE WYNAVRESCEN CENTRAL POINT ORNAVMARCORESCEN MILWAUKEE WINAVRESCEN WHITE RIVER JCT VTNAVMARCORESCEN AUGUSTA GANAVRESCEN CAPE GIRARDEAU MONAVRESCEN HUNTINGTON WVNAVMARCORESCEN PITTSBURGH PANAVRESCEN GLENS FALLS NYNAVMARCORESCEN READING PANAVRESCEN LA CROSSE WINAVRESCEN HARLINGEN TXNAVRESCEN CEDAR RAPIDS IANAVRESCEN POCATELLO IDNAVRESCEN HORSEHEADS NYNAVRESCEN COLUMBUS GANAVRESCEN TUSCALOOSA ALNAVRESCEN BILLINGS MTNAVRESCEN ASHEVILLE 35.331.311Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIACapacity Analysis Results:Reserve CentersNMCRC AKRON OHNMCRC ALAMEDA CANMCRC ALBANY NYNMCRC ALBUQUERQUE NMNMCRC AMARILLO TXNMCRC AMITYVILLE NYNMCRC ATLANTA GANMCRC AUGUSTA GANMCRC AUSTIN TXNMCRC BATON ROUGE LANMCRC BATTLE CREEK MNMCRC BESSEMER ALNMCRC BOISE IDNMCRC BUFFALO NYNMCRC CHARLOTTE NCNMCRC CHATTANOOGA TNNMCRC CINCINNATI OHNMCRC COLUMBUS OHNMCRC DENVER CONMCRC DES MOINES IANMCRC EBENSBURG PANMCRC EL PASO TXNMCRC ENCINO CANMCRC ERIE PANMCRC EUGENE ORNMCRC GRAND RAPIDS MNMCRC GREEN BAY WINMCRC GREENSBORO NCNMCRC GREENVILLE SCNMCRC GRISSOM ARB INNMCRC GULFPORT MSNMCRC HARRISBURG 984,8729,45240,327ExcessCapacity37,144 3,04347,380 11,37042,769 -8,51939,665 -27,31927,219 2,49942,769 -35,52352,049 43,64734,975 -4,0516,448 034,975 -46140,600 4,82748,466 15,84930,599 045,897 16,39937,144 21,85637,144 21837,144 8,81548,466 9,69156,900 62,33540,600 -3,32742,769 -9,46437,162 042,769 19,74734,975 18,74237,144 -13,51542,769 -22637,144 4,71742,769 12,91842,769 6294,872 09,452 015,218 25,10912Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIANMCRC HOUSTON TXNMCRC INDIANAPOLIS INMCRC JACKSONVILLE FNMCRC KNOXVILLE TNNMCRC LANSING MINMCRC LAS VEGAS NVNMCRC LEHIGH VALLEYNMCRC LITTLE ROCK ARNMCRC LOS ANGELES CANMCRC MADISON WINMCRC MANCHESTER NHNMCRC MIAMI FLNMCRC MILWAUKEE WINMCRC MINNEAPOLIS MNNMCRC MOBILE ALNMCRC MORENO VALLEYNMCRC MOUNDSVILLE WVNMCRC NEW HAVEN CTNMCRC NORFOLK VANMCRC OMAHA NENMCRC ORLANDO FLNMCRC PEORIA ILNMCRC PHOENIX AZNMCRC PITTSBURGH PANMCRC PLAINVILLE CTNMCRC PORTLAND ORNMCRC PROVIDENCE RINMCRC RALEIGH NCNMCRC READING PANMCRC RENO NVNMCRC RICHMOND VANMCRC ROANOKE VANMCRC ROCHESTER NYNMCRC ROCK ISLAND ILNMCRC SACRAMENTO CANMCRC SALT LAKE CITYNMCRC SAN ANTONIO TXNMCRC SAN DIEGO CANMCRC SHREVEPORT ,33237,92142,74859,11621,55536,23962,488 33,71145,897 9,62237,144 18,62140,600 88440,600 -11,0049,425 042,769 -16,9619,153 059,705 5,02740,600 4,23832,844 -2,54437,144 18,91439,665 19,23060,954 -10,61942,769 -8,33625,397 41,14634,975 -9,62521,000 034,975 2,02542,769 -8,01451,130 -21,56340,600 -13,62655,036 -28,65042,147 30,28940,600 -7,94648,466 3,76847,380 17,89039,665 -1,04234,975 -24934,975 -97537,144 -62434,975 -5,94242,769 -15,36234,975 12,35744,716 -6,79542,147 60151,130 7,98621,555 037,144 -90513Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIANMCRC SPOKANE WANMCRC SPRINGFIELD MONMCRC TACOMA WANMCRC TALLAHASSEE FLNMCRC TOLEDO OHNMCRC TUCSON AZNMCRC TULSA OKNMCRC WACO TXNMCRC WASHINGTON DCNMCRC WEST PALM BEACNMCRC WILMINGTON DENMCRC WORCHESTER MANMCRC YOUNGSTOWN OHNRC ADELPHI MDNRC ASHEVILLE NCNRC AVOCA PANRC BALTIMORE MDNRC BANGOR MENRC BILLINGS MTNRC BRONX NYNRC CAPE GIRARDEAU MNRC CEDAR RAPIDS IANRC CENTRAL POINT ORNRC CHARLESTON SCNRC CHEYENNE WYNRC CHICAGO ILNRC CLEVELAND OHNRC COLUMBIA SCNRC COLUMBUS GANRC CORPUS CHRISTI TNRC DECATUR ILNRC DETROIT MINRC DUBUQUE IANRC DULUTH MNNRC EARLE NJNRC EVANSVILLE INNRC EVERETT WANRC FARGO NDNRC FOREST PARK ,32320,9188,29816,82522,81678,04739,665 -4,23937,144 2,62927,966 22,61834,975 -14,41532,844 1,48323,000 042,769 -8,78134,975 -6,14426,776 040,600 2,26540,600 -5,42538,670 037,144 1,63627,966 -6,92815,218 12,66618,905 11,52525,397 30,0919,505 015,218 5,37234,050 23,42215,218 7,40815,218 -5,22015,218 4,27719,800 011,858 038,534 9,57825,397 20,41716,165 018,905 2,72639,665 4,23518,905 3,89532,494 35,49115,218 19,28615,218 -89520,918 015,218 -6,92015,218 1,60715,218 7,59825,397 52,65014Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIANRC FORT WORTH TXNRC FT CARSON CONRC FT DIX NJNRC FT RICHARDSON AKNRC GLENS FALLS NYNRC HARLINGEN TXNRC HELENA MTNRC HONOLULU HINRC HORSEHEADS NYNRC HUNTINGTON WVNRC KANSAS CITY KSNRC LA CROSSE WINRC LEMOORE CANRC LEXINGTON KYNRC LINCOLN NENRC LOUISVILLE KYNRC LUBBOCK TXNRC MEMPHIS TNNRC MERIDIAN MSNRC NASHVILLE TNNRC NEW ORLEANS LANRC OKLAHOMA CITY OKNRC ORANGE TXNRC PENSACOLA FLNRC POCATELLO IDNRC PORT HUENEME CANRC QUINCY MANRC SAGINAW MINRC SAN JOSE CANRC SILVERDALE WANRC SIOUX CITY IANRC SIOUX FALLS SDNRC ST LOUIS MONRC ST PETERBURG FLNRC SYRACUSE NYNRC TAMPA FLNRC TUSCALOOSA ALNRC WATERTOWN NYNRC WHITE RIVER ,67032,00021,4895,6464,72019,61625,397 44,36413,069 032,494 67,95515,218 2,20315,218 3,96234,975 15,54315,218 1,78115,218 8,78215,218 2,09515,218 15,90725,397 22,50315,218 14,0569,269 018,905 -14,25015,218 2,55622,915 11,30210,358 025,397 28,68618,905 11,87118,905 9,90010,320 039,357 015,218 40,45527,966 7,57215,218 -6,22615,595 015,218 17,60240,600 2,35247,380 -27,07615,218 4,39215,218 -8,01815,218 1,89456,900 17,76925,397 6,27318,905 13,09518,905 2,58415,218 -9,5724,720 015,218 4,39815Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIANRC WICHITA KSNRC WILMINGTON NCNRF MARQUETTE MITotals36,8627,80713,1325,353,20737,144 -28215,218 -7,41115,218 -2,0864,586,822 766,38516Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA
COBRA REALIGNMENT SUMMARY REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 1/2Data As Of 4/20/2005 11:17:44 AM, Report Created 4/20/2005 11:17:48 AMDepartment:Scenario File :Option Pkg Name:Std Fctrs File :Starting YearFinal YearPayback YearNavy\\server1\cobra-hsa\DON-0057\DON-0057, C5, V6.10, 20APR05.CBRClose Inspector-Instructor West Trenton, NJC:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF: 2006: 2006: 2009NPV in 2025( K):1-Time Cost( K):(3 Years)-5,8861,325Net Costs in 2005 Constant Dollars ( 8782006---POSITIONS ELIMINATEDOff0Enl0Civ0TOT0POSITIONS e Inspector-Instructor West Trenton, NJ, move to Ft Dix. Local base x is used as a receiving site forone individual tenant who will stay behind in an undetermined local office.
COBRA REALIGNMENT SUMMARY REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 2/2Data As Of 4/20/2005 11:17:44 AM, Report Created 4/20/2005 11:17:48 AMDepartment:Scenario File :Option Pkg Name:Std Fctrs File :Navy\\server1\cobra-hsa\DON-0057\DON-0057, C5, V6.10, 20APR05.CBRClose Inspector-Instructor West Trenton, NJC:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFFCosts in 2005 Constant Dollars ( ng60Missio00Other1550TOTAL1,40277Savings in 2005 Constant Dollars ( 60005245245245243,146557
TOTAL COBRA ONE-TIME COST REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 1/4Data As Of 4/20/2005 11:17:44 AM, Report Created 4/20/2005 11:17:48 AMDepartment:Scenario File :Option Pkg Name:Std Fctrs File :Navy\\server1\cobra-hsa\DON-0057\DON-0057, C5, V6.10, 20APR05.CBRClose Inspector-Instructor West Trenton, NJC:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF(All values in 2005 Constant Dollars)Category-------ConstructionMilitary ConstructionTotal - ConstructionPersonnelCivilian RIFCivilian Early RetirementEliminated Military PCSUnemploymentTotal - PersonnelOverheadProgram Management CostSupport Contract TerminationMothball / ShutdownTotal - OverheadMo
Marine Corps units to Armed Forces Reserve Center Madison, WI. Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Baton Rouge, LA and relocate the Marine Corps units to Armed Forces Reserve Center Baton Rouge, LA. Close Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Tulsa, Ok and relocate the Navy and Marine Corps units to Armed Forces Reserve Center Broken Arrow, OK.
Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original
10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan
service i Norge och Finland drivs inom ramen för ett enskilt företag (NRK. 1 och Yleisradio), fin ns det i Sverige tre: Ett för tv (Sveriges Television , SVT ), ett för radio (Sveriges Radio , SR ) och ett för utbildnings program (Sveriges Utbildningsradio, UR, vilket till följd av sin begränsade storlek inte återfinns bland de 25 största
Hotell För hotell anges de tre klasserna A/B, C och D. Det betyder att den "normala" standarden C är acceptabel men att motiven för en högre standard är starka. Ljudklass C motsvarar de tidigare normkraven för hotell, ljudklass A/B motsvarar kraven för moderna hotell med hög standard och ljudklass D kan användas vid
LÄS NOGGRANT FÖLJANDE VILLKOR FÖR APPLE DEVELOPER PROGRAM LICENCE . Apple Developer Program License Agreement Syfte Du vill använda Apple-mjukvara (enligt definitionen nedan) för att utveckla en eller flera Applikationer (enligt definitionen nedan) för Apple-märkta produkter. . Applikationer som utvecklas för iOS-produkter, Apple .
U. S. Navy Underwater Construction Teams Seabees We build -We fight -We Dive US Inventory UCT ONE, U.S. Navy (56) UCT TWO, U.S. Navy (56) 5 U.S. Army Engineer Dive Detachments, (120) What other Engineer Divers are out there? Allied Inventory Royal Thai Navy UCT (13) Philippine Navy UCT (30) Republic of Korea Navy UCT (15)
CLOSURE PRO ERTIES OF REGULAR LANGUAGES 1. Closure under Union If L and M are regular languages, so is L UM. Proof : Let L and M be the languages of regular expressions R and S, respectively. Then R S is a regular expression whose language is L U M 2. Closure under Concatenation and Kleene Closure leeneclosur
2020 Sutherland, Alister Peasant seals and sealing practices in eastern England, c. 1200-1500 Ph.D. . 2015 Harris, Maureen ‘A schismatical people’: conflict between ministers and their parishioners in Warwickshire between 1660 and 1714. Ph.D. 2015 Harvey, Ben Pauper narratives in the Welsh borders, 1790 - 1840. Ph.D. 2015 Heaton, Michael English interwar farming: a study of the financial .
