ABSTRACT KAJLA, JYOTI DALAL. ROSY1, A Novel Regulator Of Tropic And .

1y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
8.60 MB
248 Pages
Last View : 8d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Melina Bettis
Transcription

ABSTRACTKAJLA, JYOTI DALAL. ROSY1, a Novel Regulator of Tropic and Stress Responses inArabidopsis thaliana. (Under the direction of Dr. Heike Sederoff and Dr. Steven Clouse.)Plants are sessile organisms, which constantly modulate their growth to their changingenvironment. Gravity is a constant directional force that elicits a directional growth responsein plant organs, called gravitropism. Plant primary roots are positively gravitropic: they growtowards the direction of gravity. If re-oriented with respect to the vector of gravity, the rootsare able to sense the change of their orientation towards the vector of gravity, and re-directtheir growth towards the new direction by bending towards the direction of gravity. Thisbending is brought about, in part, by modulation of gene expression. In roots, gravitropic reorientation induces specific changes in gene expression. One of the earliest transcriptionalresponses to gravity stimulation is the up-regulation of ROSY1 (InteractoR OfSYnaptotagmin1) mRNA. The expression of ROSY1 mRNA is up-regulated within oneminute of gravity stimulus, but the expression is transient and recedes to basal levels withinfive to ten minutes of continous gravity stimulus. The ROSY1 mRNA expression is also upregulated in response to light stimulation in a fast and transient manner.The hypothesis of this dissertation research is that ROSY1 plays a key role in gravitropic andphototropic responses in Arabidopsis primary roots. The research presented in thisdissertation, is focused on three major objectives to answer the following questions:1) Which signal transduction factors are required for gravitropic and phototropic upregulation of the ROSY1 transcript?

To characterize the signal transduction elements required for the up-regulation of the ROSY1mRNA in Arabiopsis roots apices, we used transgenic Arabidopsis lines with altered gravityinduced phospholipid signaling. The results of this research show that the gravity and lightinduced expression of ROSY1 mRNA is strictly dependent on Phospholipase C (PLC)mediated signaling. This work is published in Plant Cell and Environment (2010) andsummarized in Chapter 2 of this thesis.2) Is ROSY1 required or essential for root tropic responses?Arabidopsis insertion mutants defective in ROSY1 have a significant difference in thegravitropic and phototropic bending. Roots of ROSY1 knockout plants bend faster ongravitropic reorientation than WT roots, indicating that ROSY1 is a negative regulator ofthese tropic responses. This phenotype is partially brought about by changes in auxintransport rates. These results as well as the cellular and subcellular localization of theROSY1 protein in Arabidopsis are described and discussed in Chapter 3 of this thesis.3) What is the physiological function of ROSY1 in Arabidopsis roots?Computational analysis identified a conserved lipid binding domain in the ROSY1 proteinsequence, and a likely localization on endomembrane systems. We therefore characterizedthe lipid binding activity of ROSY1 in vitro and its interaction with other proteins. Theresults showed that ROSY1 binds specifically to stigmasterol and phosphatidylethanolaminein vitro. ROSY1 also interacts with a protein known for its function in vesicle fusion –synaptotagmin 1 (SYT1). A metabolic profile of the membrane composition of ROSY1knockout plants showed significant changes in the sterol and phospholipid composition of themutants. Membrane composition affects physiological characteristics of plants beyond

tropisms: it is also important for plant stress signaling, defense and survival. Taken together,these results suggest that ROSY1 is involved in the regulation of vesicle-trafficking inArabidopsis root apices. These experiments are described and discussed in Chapter 4 of thisthesis.In summation, we have identified a novel protein ROSY1 in Arabidopsis that plays a key role inmediating plant gravitropic, phototropic and stress responses, possibly via specific sterol bindingand interaction with the Arabidopsis membrane trafficking protein SYT1.

ROSY1, a Novel Regulator of Tropic and Stress Responses in Arabidopsis thalianabyJyoti Dalal KajlaA dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty ofNorth Carolina State Universityin partial fulfillment of therequirements for the Degree ofDoctor of PhilosophyPlant BiologyRaleigh, North Carolina2011APPROVED BY:Dr. Heike SederoffCommittee ChairDr. Steven ClouseCommittee Co-chairDr. Rongda QuBIT Minor RepresentativeDr. Deyu XieDr. Christopher Brown

DEDICATIONThis thesis is dedicated to my mother Mrs. Suresh Dalal, who believes in potency and powerof education as the one treasure that is never lost, and who loves me, believes in me andstands by me like a rock in the darkest of times. Thank you mumma.ii

BIOGRAPHYI was born in New Delhi, India, in the spring of 1983. I was the first child in my family. Icompleted my Bachelor of Science from Sri Venkateswara College, which is one of the veryreputed colleges under the broad umbrella of Delhi University. Because of my interest inBiology, I was given a choice to pursue a degree in biology or an honors program in Botanyand Zoology. I selected Botany in July 2000 for my B.Sc., and I am studying Botany eversince. I went on to do my M.Sc. at Maharshi Dayanand University, one of the biggest, if notthe biggest university in Haryana, the original mother state for my parents and me. I triedresearch in molecular biology at the Department of Genetics, University of Delhi. Afterbreaking a pipette on the first day of work (which I did not know was serious), and tearing aglove on the second day of work (which I thought was very serious), I took to molecularbiology like a fish takes to water. I felt I had more patience and enthusiasm than mysupervisor postdocs. I got very excited looking at the PCR machines, sequencers, thebioinformatics softwares and the whole scope of computational biology and plant molecularbiology. Because I had never traveled more than 100 miles far from home, I decided to gofurther this time, and applied in distant reputed universities in India, and in the U.S. for aPh.D. degree. I am so happy I chose to work with Dr. Heike Winter Sederoff. Her patience,brilliance and coolness structured me into an able scientist, inspiring me to work hard andwork smart and be creative. Also, she bought us ice cream.iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe Ph.D. is a long, and sometimes very mentally and emotionally challenging process.Without the correct people around, it can be impossible to achieve, or may not end up beingenjoyable. I loved my Ph.D. experience, thanks to my adviser Dr. Heike Winter Sederoff.With her patience, love and just the exact right amount of nudging that kept things goingwhen I was starting to not believe in them, but never hampered the cheerfulness or creativespace I enjoyed. I thank my committee members Dr. Chris Brown for his guidance andencouragement, and for his support at ASGSB meetings. I thank Dr. Steve Clouse, Dr. RonQu and Dr. Deyu Xie for their vision and helpful advice that shaped my graduate work. Ithank NASA for funding my research project.I thank my lab buddies Chandler, Erica, Laleh, Luyan, Marc, Marie-Laure, Mia, Michelle,Roopa, Sandeep, Soundarya and Qian who lit up very dark days by their brilliant and happypresence, and kept me from losing my mind. In particular, I thank Marie-Laure for teachingme how to use ImageJ and buying boxes for western washing for me. These two items werevery helpful. I also thank Dr. Wendy Boss for her wonderful advice, and for giving me theopportunity to interact with someone of her stature. In that vein, I thank Dr. Terri Lomax forher time listening to my research progress and her valuable feedback. I am grateful to Dr.Eva Johannes, who taught me microscopy, and trusted me with microscopes, and in generalcheered up the corridors with her presence. I thank Dr. Yangju Im for answering myquestions and sharing such a good and memorable time with me in Montreal. I thank Beth foriv

working with me during our yeast two hybrid experiment, and for all her time and effortsbeing my mentor for all needs and purposes through the entire Ph.D. I am grateful to myother corridor buddies Mingzhu, Lissette and Cat for their friendship. I thank Dr. SoniaHerrero for the opportunity of knowing her.Finally, I thank my very cute husband Nishant for his love and support. I appreciate his help,patience and kindness. I thank my parents Dayanand Dalal and Suresh Dalal, and my siblingsSwati and Varun for their love, support and encouraging me to keep a light and slightlycomic attitude when the goings gets rough.v

TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF TABLES . xLIST OF FIGURES . xiChapter 1. Literature review . 1GRAVITROPISM. 1Overview . 1Gravity perception . 2Polar auxin transport . 6Auxin influx carriers . 8Auxin efflux carriers . 10Auxin and root gravitropism . 18Shoot gravitropism . 24Role of membrane composition in gravitropic responses. . 25Membrane lipid composition . 25Membrane sterol composition. 31Membrane composition and gravitropism . 34Membrane trafficking and gravitropism . 37vi

PHOTOTROPISM . 39Red light phototropism . 42Blue light phototropism . 43Regulation of phototropism . 43Interaction between gravitropism and phototropism . 46SYNAPTOTAGMIN . 47REFERENCES . 52MY CONTRIBUTION . 74SIGNIFICANCE TO THE DISSERTATION . 74Gravity and light stimulate InsP3 generation . 74Gravity and light up-regulated gene expression . 75Gravity and light-induced regulation of ROSY1 mRNA abundance is InsP3-dependent 76COPY OF THE PUBLICATION . 77. 78. 92REFERENCES . 93Chapter 3. ROSY1-mediated regulation of tropic bending . 95INTRODUCTION . 95vii

RESULTS . 104Computational Analysis of ROSY1 . 104Phylogenetic analysis of ROSY1 . 107Identification of rosy1-1 knockout mutant . 110Genetic rescue of rosy1-1 knockout mutant . 112Morphology of rosy1-1 knockout mutant . 113ROSY1 is involved in gravitropic and phototropic response . 114Gravitropic bending phenotype. 115Phototropic bending phenotype . 119Root Cell Layer and Starch phenotype . 122ROSY1 Expression Localization . 123ROSY1 Protein localization . 125ROSY1 and basipetal auxin transport . 130ROSY1 and localization of PIN proteins . 132DISCUSSION . 134MATERIALS AND METHODS . 137REFERENCES . 149viii

Chapter 4. Molecular aspects of ROSY1 function . 157INTRODUCTION . 157RESULTS . 162ROSY1 lipid/sterol binding . 162ROSY1 and membrane sterol and lipid composition . 171ROSY1 protein-protein interactions . 179Function of ROSY1 in salt stress . 184Feedback control in ROSY1 isoform expression. 188DISCUSSION . 190ROSY1 affects membrane sterol composition. . 192ROSY1 interacts with SYT1 . 197Future Experiments . 200MATERIALS AND METHODS . 203REFERENCES . 213APPENDIX 1 Comparison of lipid profiles between WT and rosy1-1 . 223ix

LIST OF TABLESTable 1. A summary of ROSY1 recombinant protein expression efforts .164Table 2 Comparative quantitities of various lipids and sterols in rosy1-1 and WT. .178x

LIST OF FIGURESChapter 1. Literature ReviewFigure 1.1 Gravity-induced sedimentation of root cap statoliths. . 2Figure 1.2 A model of intercellular auxin transport. . 8Figure 1.3 Expression localization of PIN protein in Arabidopsis root tip. . 13Figure 1.4 Sub-cellular trafficking of auxin efflux and influx carriers. . 17Figure 1.5 Gravity-induced asymmetric auxin distribution. . 21Figure 1.6 Structure of major lipids in plant membranes. . 26Chapter 3. ROSY1-mediated regulation of tropic bendingFigure 3.1 Gravity and light-induced ROSY1 expression . 101Figure 3.2 Gravity and light-induced up-regulation of ROSY1 mRNA is InsP3-dependent. .103Figure 3.3 Predicted ROSY1 secondary structure. 105Figure 3.4 Position of the ROSY1 ML domain . 107Figure 3.5 Taxonomic conservation of ROSY1 coding sequence . 108Figure 3.6 ROSY1 potential isoforms and their expression localization 109Figure 3.7 Identification of rosy1-1 mutant. .111Figure 3.8 Seedling growth phenotype of rosy1-1 vs. WT seedlings 113Figure 3.9 Root gravitropic bending analysis of light-grown seedlings 116Figure 3.10 Root and hypocotyl gravitropic bending analysis of dark-grown seedlings . 117xi

Figure 3.11 Hypocotyl gravitropic bending analysis of dark-grown seedlings. 120Figure 3.12 Gravitropic and phototropic bending of rosy1-1 hypocotyls. 121Figure 3.13 Root cell layer comparison between rosy1-1 and WT roots . 122Figure 3.14 Root tip amyloplasts comparison between rosy1-1 and WT roots. 123Figure 3.15 Tissue-specific ROSY1 mRNA localization using semi-quantitative RT-PCR.124Figure 3.16 ProROSY1:GFP expression. .125Figure 3.17 ProROSY1:GFP-ROSY1 expression. .127Figure 3.18 ProROSY1:ROSY1-EGFP localization. .128Figure 3.19 ROSY1-EGFP protein, DNA and mRNA in ProROSY1:ROSY1-EGFPplants . .129Figure 3.20 Measurement of basipetal auxin transport in rosy1-1 roots. .131Figure 3.21 PIN1, PIN2 and PIN4 localization in rosy1-1 vs. WT roots. .133Chapter 4. Molecular aspects of ROSY1 functionFigure 4.1 Crystallized structure of NPC2 depicting the lipid binding cavity. .159Figure 4.2 Lipid binding cavities in NPC2. .160Figure 4.3 ROSY1 protein expression from K. lactis. .166Figure 4.4ROSY1 Sterol Binding Assay. .168Figure 4.5 AtROSY1ML-HA Lipid Binding Assay. 170Figure 4.6 Comparison of ROSY1 binding with Stigmasterol, DPPE and DOPE. .171Figure 4.7 Sterol composition of rosy1-1 vs. WT roots and hypocotyls. .173Figure 4.8 Molar percentages of sterols of rosy1-1 vs. WT roots and hypocotyls. .174xii

Figure 4.9 PE composition of rosy1-1 vs. WT roots and hypocotyls. .175Figure 4.10 PA composition of rosy1-1 vs. WT roots and hypocotyls. 176Figure 4.11 Different PA composition of rosy1-1 vs. WT roots and hypocotyls. 177Figure 4.12 Interaction between ROSY1 and SYT1 in yeast 180Figure 4.13 Synaptotagmin and the SNARE complex. .182Figure 4.14 Arabidopsis SYT1 protein sequence showing ROSY1 interacting domain. .183Figure 4.15 Co-transformation of SYT1 and ROSY1 in yeast. 184Figure 4.16 NaCl salt stress phenotype of rosy1-1 vs. WT seedlings. .186Figure 4.17 KCl and mannitol stress phenotype of rosy1-1 vs. WT seedlings. 187Figure 4.18 Characterization of isoform transcriptional levels in rosy1-1 mutants. .189Fugure 4.19 Model of ROSY1 action . . 194xiii

Chapter 1. Literature reviewGRAVITROPISMOverviewThe direction and force of gravity is one of the very few constant physical parameters thatremains unchanged throughout the life of a plant. It is the first tropic stimulus that agerminating seed perceives, and the entire initial plant structure is set with reference togravity. In general, roots are positively gravitropic and grow towards the direction of gravity,whereas shoots are negatively gravitropic and grow away from the direction of gravity. In theroot system, the primary root is positively gravitropic and always grows towards the directionof gravity (Darwin, 1868). The lateral roots are initially plagiogravitropic, which means thatthey grow at a fixed angle to gravity even though they do not face towards gravity, but thischanges as they grow longer (for e.g. longer than 10mm in Arabidopsis) , after which theyalso grow in the direction of gravity (Kiss et al., 2002).All plant organs grow at a specific angle with respect to the gravity vector, called GravitropicSet point Angle, or GSA (Digby and Firn, 1995). The GSA for most roots is 0 and forshoots 180 , but it can change depending upon the type of plant and the environmentalconditions. For example, the GSA for corn shoots is 180 but that for some vines, climbersand grasses can be anywhere between 0 and 180 . Primary root GSA is 0 , but that of lateral1

roots can be variable. Gravitropic responses are plant movements aiming to restore adisplaced GSA, whatever that GSA may be (Digby and Firn, 1995).Gravity perceptionIn plant roots, the site of gravity signal perception is the root tip, specifically, the columellacells at the root tip (Darwin, 1868). The columella cells contain starch-filled plastids(amyloplasts) called statoliths (Haberlandt, 1900; Nemec, 1900), as seen in Figure 1.1 (Leitzet al., 2009).Figure 1.1 Gravity-induced sedimentation of root cap statoliths.Root cap cells were imaged using differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy to monitorgravity-directed statolith sedimentation. a) Three tiers of four cells each at the root cap, labeled S1, S22

and S3, are called columella cells. These cells contain amyloplasts (AM) called statoliths. b) Anenlarged columella cell showing statoliths sedimented towards the direction of gravity (g), denoted bythe black arrow.The cortical endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the cell wall (CW) and the nucleus (N) ofthe cell are also labeled. c-j) Gravitropic reorientation of the root by 90 , as shown in c) is followedby re-orientation of statoliths to the direction of gravity. Statoliths start re-orienting within 60 secondsof root re-orientation (d); within 591 seconds ( 10 minutes), statoliths are complete;t reoriented to thedirection of gravity (j). Image reproduced from Leitz et al. (2009) (Leitz et al., 2009).As seen in Figure 1.1, the statoliths physically “fall down” towards the direction of gravity,and they are widely accepted as “gravity-sensors” in the root columella cells and theendodermal cells of the negatively gravitropic influorescence stem (Thimann and Pickard,1965; Pickard and Thimann, 1966; Kiss and Hertel, 1989; Fukaki et al. 1998; Leitz et al.,2009).If the direction of root orientation with respect to gravity changes, statoliths at the root tipreorient towards the direction of gravity within minutes, as seen in Figure 1.1 (Leitz et al.,2009) and this mechanical force is somehow converted to a biochemical signal that istransduced from the columella cells to the elongation zone of the root. The elongation zonethen initiates asymmetric cell elongation. The cells on the side of the root away from gravityelongate more than the cells on the other side, and this unequal cell elongation causes acurvature towards the direction of gravity, so that, in a very short time post re-orientation, theroot tip grows towards the direction of gravity again.Lateral roots of Arabidopsis (Kiss et al., 2002), tea (Yamashita et al., 1997), sunflower(Stoker and Moore, 1984) and castor oil plant Ricinus(Moore and Pasieniuk, 1984) also havecolumella cells, though fewer than primary root tips. These cells house amyloplasts too,3

which explains the gravitropic properties of lateral roots. Statoliths, are not the only factorsinvolved in gravitropic perception, as gravitropic response is seen in systems lackingstatoliths as well, such as in bean lateral roots (Ransom and Moore, 1985).Cytoplasmic streaming in internodes of the alga Chara is gravitropically induced but is notstatolith-dependent (Staves et al., 1995) and suggests that the entire protoplast may alsofunction as gravity sensor in some organisms. It has also been shown that cellular organellessuch as plastids in mutants with reduced starch (Sack, 1997) or vacuoles and liposomes infungi (Grolig et al., 2006) can sediment in response to gravitropic stimulus and cause agravitropic response.The sedimentation of amyloplasts is the first root response to gravitropic reorientation, and itis considered to be important for the root bending (Blancaflor et al., 1998). Laser-mediatedablation of root cap cells causes loss of gravity perception by roots (Tsugeki and Fedoroff,1999). The roots of starch-deficient Arabidopsis mutants, such as pgm-1 have starch-lessplastids in the columella cells, and display reduced gravitropic bending response (Caspar andPickard, 1989; Kiss et al., 1989). On the other hand, the roots of excess starch-containingArabidopsis sex1 mutants display a hyper-gravitropic response (increased gravitropicbending) (Vitha et al., 2007).The sedimentation of amyloplasts towards the vector of gravity is not entirely due to theirhigher particle density; the cellular actin cytoskeleton may have an important role to play forgravity-directed statolith sedimentation. This was demonstrated with Arabidopsis4

sgr9mutants, which have reduced interaction between F-actin and amyloplasts. Theamyloplasts in hypocotyl endodermis of these plants show increased jumping-like saltatorymovements, but do not sediment in response to gravity (Nakamura et al., 2011), causing areduced gravitropic response. The mutation is rescued by addition of actin de-polymerizingdrug Latrunculin B (Lat B), or genetically by fiz1 mutation, which causes fragmentation ofactin filaments (Nakamura et al., 2011). Research using Lat B on Arabidopsis roots andhypocotyls indicates that actin filaments somehow impede gravitropic response, andtherefore, may have some role in gravitropic signaling (Blancaflor et al., 2003; Hou et al.,2003; Hou et al., 2004).The gravity-induced re-orientation of amyloplasts in the root tip is a mechanical response,which has to be translated into biochemical signal(s) in the columella cells that are yetuncharacterized (Peer et al., 2011). These mobile signals reach the root elongation zone,where differential cell elongation enables gravitropic bending. Over a century of research ongravitropism has identified some key components for gravitropic signal transduction,including InsP3, Ca2 , and the phytohormone auxin.THE ROLE OF AUXIN IN GRAVITROPIC RESPONSESThe first and perhaps the most important gravity signaling component discussed here is thephytohormone auxin. Using various mutant studies and biochemical data, it has beendemonstrated that the gravity-induced differential cell elongation in the root is caused5

because of a gradient in the distribution of auxin. This gradient is formed due to polar auxintransport. Polar auxin transport and its effects of gravitropism will be discussed below.Polar auxin transportThe asymmetric auxin distribution in plant tissues is brought about by asymmetric auxintransport, called polar auxin transport (Muday and DeLong, 2001). Generated in response totropic stimuli and developmental cues, polar auxin transport forms an important link betweenenvironmental signals and the plant form. Asymmetric auxin distribution is responsible forasymmetrical cellular elongation and organ bending during tropic responses such asgravitropism (Swarup et al., 2005).Auxin is transported long distances from the site of synthesis (young leaf primordial andmeristematic tissues) to sink tissues such as lateral root induction sites by mass transportviathe phloem (Goldsmith et al., 1977; Marchant et al., 2002). Auxin is also transported throughsmall distances via cell-to-cell plasma membrane-mediated active transport (Zazimalova etal., 2010). Auxin formed in leaf primordium cells is transported by short distance cell to celltransport through various cell files until it reaches phloem sieve elements (Goldsmith et al.,1977). Cell to cell transport is also utilized by transporting IAA through cambial cells fromshoot to root. Phloem transports auxin by bulk flow until it reaches the central cells of theprimary root, from where auxin again travels by short distance cell to cell transport to reachparticular root cells (Swarup et al., 2005).6

IAA molecules are freely permeable through the plasma membrane, which means that theycan enter the cell through the pl

KAJLA, JYOTI DALAL. ROSY1, a Novel Regulator of Tropic and Stress Responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. (Under the direction of Dr. Heike Sederoff and Dr. Steven Clouse.) . This thesis is dedicated to my mother Mrs. Suresh Dalal, who believes in potency and power of education as the one treasure that is never lost, and who loves me, believes in .

Related Documents:

3. Poorvanangam (Kuchipudi) Prem Jyoti Dance Academy 4. Ganga Tarang (Odissi) Nrityanjali Theatre 5. Pushpunjali (Bharat Natyam) Prem Jyoti Dance Academy 6. Basanta Pallavi (Orissi) Nrityanjali Theatre 7. Tarana (Kathak) Susan Mohip Dance Company 8. Tarangam Karen Dass Prem Jyoti Dance Academy NARRATION IN DANCE 1 Rachel Lee FOLK 9.

8 Sept 2016, National Environment Commission, Royal Government of Bhutan, Thimphu Hipondoka M.H.T., Dalal-Clayton D.B. and van Gils H. (2016, in press) Lessons Learned from Voluntary . Wilton Park, England, 1-4 October 2007 Dalal-Clayton D.B. and Krikhaar F (2007): A New Sustainable Development Strategy: An Opportunity Not to be

Vidya Jyoti Institute of Higher Education www.vjihe.org VJ-Indian Defence Academy . (Self-inflicted or otherwise), suicide and/or suicide attempt, death, infections and diseases caused by any insect-bites, animal-bite, plant-bites or . I shall myself be responsible for any sort of liability arising and any civil or criminal case lying .

3 MATHS HEROES 22 -Jan2021 and 23 2021 VI VII MsPreeti, Reena 4 CROSS COUNTRY MATHS 18 -Jan 2021 VI VII MsPreeti, Reena 5 MATH-WHIZZ 20 -Jan 2021 VIII Ms SupriyaKhokhran 6 MATH -O-STRING 18 Jan 2021 IX Ms SupriyaKhokhran 7 LIMIT BREAKER 19 -Jan2021 and 21 2021 X XI Ms Jyoti Yadav 8 MATHS GLOSSARY 20 -Jan 2021 X XI Ms Jyoti Yadav

Technical Analysis MasterClass Cheat-Sheet 3 Jyoti Bansal - Certified Technical Analyst ( NCFM ), Investment Advisor ( NISM ) 3 EXPONENTIAL MOVING AVERAGE (EMA) The exponential moving average is very similar to Simple Moving Average. But it assigns more importance to latest data and reduce the lag.

Int. J. LifeSc. Bt & Pharm. Res. 2013 C P Malik and Jyoti, 2013 SEED DETERIORATION: A REVIEW Jyoti1 and C P Malik1* Review Article Seed deterioration is an undesirable and detrimental attribute of agriculture. This process is a separate event from seed development and germination. Losses in s

Malekandathil, Lotika Varadarajan and Amar Farooqui (eds), India, the Portuguese and Maritime Interactions, Primus, New Delhi, 2019, pp264-276. Atwal, Jyoti. ‘Rebuilding Contemporary Afghanistan: The Dynamics of Gender Reform’, in Nasir Raza Khan (ed), India and Central Asia: Geopolitics

mampu mengemban misi memperluas akses pendidikan di bidang akuntansi. -4- Untuk meraih kepercayaan sebagai agen pemberdayaan masyarakat, melalui tridharma perguruan tinggi, Prodi S1 Akuntansi FE UUI harus menjadi program studi yang dikenal memiliki reputasi andal. Untuk mewujudkan visi dan misi yang sudah ditetapkan Pihak Rektorat, Prodi S-1 Akuntansi – Fakultas Ekonomi – Universitas .