High Velocity Oxy-Fuel (HVOF) Thermal Spray Deposition Of .

3y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
6.81 MB
270 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Lucca Devoe
Transcription

High Velocity Oxy-Fuel (HVOF) Thermal Spray Depositionof Functionally Graded CoatingsA Thesis Submitted to theFaculty o f Engineering and Computing,School o f Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,Dublin City UniversityFor the Degree o f Doctor o f PhilosophyByMahbub Hasan, B.Sc. Eng.Materials Processing Research Centre andNational Centre for Plasma Science and TechnologyDublin City UniversityResearch SupervisorsDr. Joseph Stokes (BA, BAI, Ph.D., MIEI)Dr. Lisa Looney (BA, BAI, Ph.D., CEng., MIEI)Professor M. S. J. Hashmi (Ph.D., D.Sc., CEng., FIMechE., FIEI, MASME)J a n u a ry 2 0 0 5

DECLARATIONI hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on theprogramme of study leading to the award o f Doctor of Philosophy, is entirely myown w ork and has not been taken from the work o f others save and to the extentthat such work has not been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work.Signed:Date: 25/01/05(Mahbub Hasan)Student I.D. No.: 99146215I

ACKNOW LEDGEM ENTThere are many individuals who have assisted me during my present work. I would liketo thank you all.My first vote o f thanks must go to Dr. Joseph Stokes for his unceasing enthusiasm,interest, constructive criticism and practical hand on assistance with the HVOF thermalspray system and for putting up with me over the years. His expertise, availability todiscuss ideas and willingness to give his knowledge were instrumental in thecompletion o f this thesis. I owe him much gratitude.I would like to express my sincere thanks to Dr. Lisa Looney, for whom I have thegreatest respect and admiration. Her guidance and supervision were invaluable. I amextremely grateful for all her advises and suggestions towards solving the problem. I amprivileged to have worked with her.I will be forever indebted to Professor M. S. J. Hashmni who not only funded myproject but also supported and supervised me unstintingly. Without his support andencouragement this research would not have been done.I would like to acknowledge our technicians Mr. Michael Tyrrell, Liam Domnican,Chris Crouch, Keith Hickey, Michael May, Alan Meehan and Jim Barry for theirtechnical help and discussions at various stages o f the work. Special thanks to Mr.Michael Tyrrell for his regular support during my work.I am grateful to Professor Mohiuddin Ahmed (BUET) for initially selecting me from theDepartment o f Materials and Metallurgical Engineering (BUET) for doing research inDCU and assisting me in coming to Ireland.My most sincere gratitude is extended to my family, especially my mother, belovedfather and elder brother (who died in a mine blast in Georgia) who have given theirutmost support throughout my life so far. They have inspired me whole-heartedly sincemy childhood to progress in my educational career leading to Ph.D.II

I wish to thank all o f my fellow postgraduate students for their support and friendshipduring my study in DCU. My thanks also go to the Bangladeshi Community (speciallyJulfikar Haider, my housemate for over four years) in Ireland who provided me a lot o fsupport and fun during my life in Dublin.Ill

DEDICATIONDEDICATED TOMY PARENTS(LATE DR. AHMAD HUSAIN & MAHBUBA HUSAIN)ANDELDER BROTHER(LATE COLONEL MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN)IV

ABSTRACTHigh Velocity Oxy-Fuel (HVOF) Thermal Spray Deposition ofFunctionally Graded CoatingsMahbub HasanThe present study investigates an innovative modification o f a HVOF (High VelocityOxy-Fuel) thermal spray process to produce functionally graded thick coatings. In orderto deposit thick coatings, certain problems have to be overcome. More specifically theseproblems include minimizing residual stresses, which cause shape distortion in assprayed components. Residual stresses in coatings also lead to adhesion loss,interlaminar debonding, cracking or buckling and are particularly high where there is alarge property difference between the coating and the substrate. Graded coatings enablegradual variation o f the coating composition and/or microstructure, which offers thepossibility o f reducing residual stress build-up in coatings.In order to spray such a coating, modification to a commercial powder feed hopper wasrequired to enable it to deposit two powders simultaneously. This allows deposition ofdifferent layers o f coating with changing chemical compositions, without interruptingthe spraying process. Various concepts for this modification were identified and onedesign was selected, having been validated through use o f a process model, which wasdeveloped using ANSYS Finite Element Analysis. The model simulates the flow ofnitrogen gas and powder through the system, and verified the supply o f mixedcomposition powders. Based on this information a multi-powder feed unit wasmanufactured, commissioned and calibrated. Multi-layer coatings o f aluminium andtool-steel were sprayed onto aluminium substrates. The chemical composition ofdifferent layers of a five layer graded coating was determined using energy dispersiveX-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to confirm functionality.Subsequently, various controlled parameters o f the HVOF spraying process werestudied for this type o f coating using 33 factorial design o f experiments. Results wereanalysed in terms o f surface stress to deposition thickness ratio. The best combinationo f spray parameters identified for deposition o f the mixed coating resembles thoserecommended for aluminium powder alone. It is proposed that this arises from thethermal properties o f the constituent powders.Different types o f aluminium/tool-steel functionally graded coatings were thendeposited using the optimised set o f spray parameters, and considered using Clyne’sanalytical method o f stress analysis and Vickers hardness testing method. Coatingscomposed o f thicker layers resulted in much higher residual stress, but also improvedhardness compared to thinner samples. It was found that if 5 layers o f graded materialare sprayed, and the residual stress compared to that o f a traditional single layer (of thesame thickness), an approximately 48 % reduction can be achieved. However thisbenefit is mitigated somewhat by the fact that applying these multi-layers reduces thehardness to by approximately 16 % compared to the traditional single layered deposit.Therefore an engineer must compromise between the stress and hardness whendesigning a functionally graded coating-substrate system.V

TABLE OF stractTable of ContentsList of FiguresList of TablesCHAPTER 11.1CHAPTER 2IHIVVVIKXIVINTRODUCTIONIntroduction1LITERATURE REVIEW2.1Introduction42.2Overview of Coating Techniques42.3Thermal Spray Techniques2.3.1 HVOF Thermal Spray Process2.3.2 HVOF Gun Design79112.4The HVOF Process2.4.1 Combustion and Gas Dynamics o f theHVOF System2.4.2 Advantages o f the HVOF Coating2.4.3 Disadvantages o f the HVOF System1414Thermally Sprayed Coatings2.5.1 Input Powder Production2.5.2 Coating Deposition, Solidification andBuild-Up2.5.3 Residual Stress2.5.4 Coating Structure and Properties18181921272.6Functionally Graded Materials (FGM)2.6.1 Constructive Processes2.6.2 Transport-Based Processes2930322.7Functionally Graded Coatings2.7.1 Different Techniques Producing FunctionallyGraded Coatings35352.5VI1617

2.7.2Characteristics and Properties o f FunctionallyGraded Coatings2.7.3 Applications o f Functionally Graded CoatingsCHAPTER 34447EXPERIMENTAL WORK & Thermal Spraying SystemGas supply and flow meter unitPowder feed unitDiamond Jet (DJ) gunSupport 3.3.6of a Dual Powder Feed SystemDesign ConceptsRating ChartAdvantages and DisadvantagesDescription o f Chosen Concept DeviceNitrogen Gas-Powder Flow ModelDesign Calibration and Test626369707174813.4HVOF Spraying Procedure3.4.13.4.283Surface PreparationSpraying Process83833.5Optimisation of Spray Parameters863.6Coating Characterization Techniques3.6.1 Microscopy3.6.2 Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS)3.6.3 X-Ray Diffraction Phase Characterization3.6.4 Measurement o f Mechanical Properties3.6.5 Measurement o f Residual StressCHAPTER 48888959697104RESULTS & 2.31131141161394.3of SimulationInitial TestsFinal SimulationEffect o f Gravity and Change o f Dimension o fthe Gas-Powder Carrying Tubes and Pick-UpShaft4.2.4 Conclusion o f the ResultsCalibration Tests4.3.1 Powder Flow Bench TestsVII151153153

4.4CHAPTER 54.3.2 In Situ Flow Tests159Optimisation of Spray Parameters4.4.1 Chemical Composition of Different Layers ofa Graded Coating4.4.2 Microstructure and Phase Identification4.4.3 Measurement o f Young’s Modulus andPoisson’s RatioMeasuremento f Residual Stress4.4.4161161Variation of Residual Stress4.5.1 Variation o f Residual Stress with DepositThickness4.5.2 Variation o f Residual Stress with Numbero f Layers4.5.3 Effect on Hardness189189Comparison Between Stress Measurements196165169172192193CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATIONS5.15.2ConclusionsRecommendations for Future W ork198201PUBLICATIONS ARISING FROM THIS ixAppendixAppendixAppendixABCDEDifferent Parts Involving Concept FourANSYS ResultsResults o f Aluminium Powder Flow Bench TestsResults o f Tool-Steel Powder Flow Bench TestsStress Distribution ProfileVIIIA1A12A20A23A26

LIST OF ure2.12.22.32.42.52.62.7Figure 2.8Figure 2.9Figure 2.10Figure 2.11Figure 2.12FigureFigureFigureFigure2.132.142.152.16Figure 2.17Figure 2.18Figure 03.21Coating deposition techniquesDevelopment o f the Thermal Spray TechnologySchematic of cross-section o f a Diamond Jet spray gunSchematic o f a throat combustion burner HVOF gunSchematic o f a chamber combustion burner HVOF gunTheoretical flame temperature against oxygen/fuel ratioCross-section o f a columnar structure (single lamella) formed aftersolidificationSchematic of quenching stressesChange o f state o f substrate and particle during coating depositionQualitative quenching stress development in aluminium/tool-steelfunctionally graded coatingSchematic of cooling stressesQualitative cooling stress development in aluminium/tool-steelfunctionally graded coatingSchematic section of a spray depositSchematic o f the solid-state powder consolidation processFunctionally graded coating of material A and BSchematic of a single torch and dual feeder system for theproduction of functionally graded coatingsInjection o f the ceramic and organic powders in the hottest andcolder part o f the flame respectivelySchematic of the production o f graded coatings using pre-mixedpowders and a single torchSchematic o f the production o f FGC using the slurry dipping process681112131620The HVOF thermal spray systemThe gas flow m eter unitThe powder feed unitSchematic cross-section o f the hopper assembly on the DJ powderfeed unitDifferent parts o f the Diamond Jet gunCross-section o f assembled Diamond Jet gunSchematic o f the traverse unit and carbon dioxide cooling systemSchematic of graded coatings; (a) undesired layered, (b) desiredheterogeneousSchematic o f the control system and powder feed hopperFlow diagram o f the second proposed systemSchematic diagram o f concept twoFlow diagram o f the third proposed systemSectional assembly drawing o f the proposed designed partsSectional assembly drawing o f the designed parts along withthe previous hopperPhotograph o f dual powder feed unitGeometry o f the powder and nitrogen gas flow tubesSchematic of applied boundary conditionsSchematic o f a scanning electron microscope (SEM)Schematic o f an energy dispersive X-ray sprectroscopy (EDS)Schematic of an eddy current gaugeThe cantilever approach for measuring the Young’s modulus andPoisson’s 666676869727677949599101

Figure 3.22Figure 3.23Figure 3.24Figure 3.25Figure 4.1Figure 4.2Figure 4.3Figure 4.4Figure 4.5Figure 4.6Figure 4.7Figure 4.8Figure 4.9Figure 4.10Figure 4.11Figure 4.12Figure 4.13Figure 4.14Figure 4.15Figure 4.16Figure 4.17Figure 4.18Figure 4.19Figure 4.20Figure 4.21Strain and stress distribution for a coated cantilever beam withapplied load PSchematic description of the generation o f curvature in a bi-materialplate as a result o f misfit strainClyne’s method used to determine distributed stress in gradedcoatingsPhotograph o f aluminium/tool-steel graded coated aluminiumsampleList o f various results sets achieved in this researchDual powder feed unit with a homogeneous mesh all through themodelA nitrogen gas pressure ratio o f 8:1 on the inlet pressure tube to theleft-hand side of the pick-up shaftDual powder feed unit with a fine mesh in the mixing zoneParticle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio o f 8:1 and powder ratio o f 3:1M ass fraction simulation results of the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 3:1, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio o f 8:1Different points on the fluid flow (a), the velocity profile o f the fluidthrough the top gas-powder flow tubes (b) and the pick-up shaft (c)for powders at a ratio of 3:1 and a nitrogen gas pressure ratio of 8:1Particle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio of 9:1 and powder ratio o f 3:1Mass fraction simulation results of the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 3:1, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio of 9:1Particle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio o f 10:1 and powder ratio o f 3:1Mass fraction simulation results o f the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 3:1, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio of 10:1M ass fraction results of (a) aluminium and (b) tool-steelpowder (rescaled)Particle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio o f 8:1 and powder ratio o f 1:1Mass fraction simulation results o f the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 1:1, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio o f 8:1Particle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio of 9:1 and powder ratio o f 1:1M ass fraction simulation results o f the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 1:1, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio o f 9:1Particle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio o f 10:1 and powder ratio o f 1:1M ass fraction simulation results of the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 1:1, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio o f 10:1Particle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio o f 8:1 and powder ratio o f 1:3M ass fraction simulation results o f the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 1:3, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio o f 8:1Particle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio of 9:1 and powder ratio of 27128129130131132133134135136

Figure 4.22Figure 4.23Figure 4.24Figure 4.25Figure 4.26Figure 4.27Figure 4.28Figure 4.29Figure 4.30Figure 4.31Figure 4.32Figure 4.33Figure 4.34Figure 4.35Figure 4.36Figure 4.37Figure 4.38Figure 4.39Figure 4.40Figure 4.41Figure 4.42Mass fraction simulation results of the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 1:3, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio of 9:1Particle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders for a pressureratio o f 10:1 and powder ratio of 1:3Mass fraction simulation results o f the (a) aluminium and (b) toolsteel powder at a ratio o f 1:3, nitrogen gas in the (c) inlet pressuretube and (d) pick-up shaft for a pressure ratio o f 10:1Growth o f boundary layer in a pipeSchematic o f (a) powders not mixing and (b) powders mixing fornitrogen gas velocity of 3970 cm/s and 2000 cm/s respectively onthe inlet pressure tubeParticle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders (at a ratio of1:3) with nitrogen gas velocities o f 2000 cm/s and 2965 cm/s on theinlet pressure tube (of a diameter o f 6 mm) and pick-up shaftrespectivelyMass fraction simulation results o f the nitrogen gas (from the pickup shaft) for the aluminium and tool-steel powder at ratios’ of (a)3:1, (b) 1:1 and (c) 1:3 with nitrogen gas velocities o f 2000 cm/sand 2965 cm/s on the inlet pressure tube (of a diameter o f 6 mm) andthe pick-up shaft respectivelySchematic of the velocity profile o f the fluid through two differentpick-up shaft having different lengthsParticle flow lines o f the nitrogen gas and powders (at a ratio o f 3:1)for a pressure ratio of 10:1 with a 48.8 mm long pick-up shaftSchematic of (a) powders not entering and (b) powders mixingentering through the pick-up shaft hole for pressure ratio o f 10:1 and17:1 on the inlet pressure tube to the pick-up shaft respectivelyParticle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders (1:3) withnitrogen gas velocities o f 5220 cm/s and 2965 cm/s on the inletpressure tube and the pick-up shaft (of a diameter o f 6 mm)respectivelyParticle flow lines for the nitrogen gas and powders (at a ratio o f1:3) for a pressure ratio o f 10: lw ith 6 mm diameter powder flowtubesMass fraction simulation results o f the nitrogen gas (from the pickup shaft) for the aluminium and tool-steel powder at ratios’ of (a)3:1, (b) 1:1 and (c) 1:3 with a nitrogen gas pressure ratio o f 10:1 onthe inlet pressure tube to the pick-up shaft and 6 mm diameterpowder flow tubesAverage mass flow rate (g/sec) Vs number o f turns o f the needleshaped bolt for the aluminium powder in chamber A and BAverage mass flow rate (g/sec) Vs number o f turns o f the needleshaped bolt for the tool-steel powder in chamber A and BAverage mass flow rate o f the tool-steel and aluminium powderagainst number o f turns o f the needle shaped bolt in both chamber Aand BSEM images of the (a) aluminium and (b) tool-steel powderResults o f the in-situ flow testsChemical composition o f (a) first layer (100 % Al) and (b) secondlayer (75 % Al, 25 % TS) o f a five layer aluminium/tool-steelfunctionally graded coatingChemical composition o f the (a) third layer (50 % Al, 50 % TS) and(b) fourth layer (25 % Al, 75 % TS) o f a five layer aluminium/toolsteel functionally graded coatingChemical composition o f the final layer (100 % TS) of a five layeraluminium/tool-steel functionally graded 4155157158159162163164

Figure 4.43Figure 4.44Figure 4.45Figure 4.46Figure 4.47Figure 4.48Figure 4.49Figure 4.50Figure 4.51Figure 4.52Figure 4.53Figure 4.54Figure 4.55Figure 4.56Figure 4.57Figure 4.58Figure 4.59Figure FigureFigureFigureFigureAlA2A3A4A5Figure A6Figure A7Figure A8Figure A9Figure AIOOptical micrograph of aluminium/tool-steel graded coatingdeposited onto an aluminium substratePhase analysis o f an aluminium/tool-steel graded coating depositedonto an aluminium substrateChemical Composition o f (a) aluminium rich region, (b) middleportion and (c) tool-steel rich region of an aluminium/tool-steelgraded coating166Theoretical flame temperature against oxygen/fuel ratio170173Experimental and simulation front and back temperatures for coatedand uncoated aluminium substratesFinite Element temperature distribution for 0.25 mm graded coatingResidual stress distribution through a 0.50 mm thick gradeddeposit and substrateResidual stress distribution through a 0.50 mm thick graded depositand subs

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Overview of Coating Techniques 4 2.3 Thermal Spray Techniques 7 2.3.1 HVOF Thermal Spray Process 9 2.3.2 HVOF Gun Design 11 2.4 The HVOF Process 14 2.4.1 Combustion and Gas Dynamics of t

Related Documents:

DOE UCR/HBCU &MI Review Meeting June 2013 Background Liquid Fueled High Velocity Oxy-Fuel Thermal Spraying Technique for Durable Coating The HVOF thermal spraying technique is widely applicable to high-temperature coating m

Applicability of oxy-fuel technology to clinker burning process Oxygen production by air separation is state of the art (by freezing or membranes) Oxy-fuel technology is state of the art in other industries, e.g. for glass production New combustion technologies required, e.g.: - Oxy-fuel burner - Waste gas recirculation

Fuel transfer pump (35) is mounted on the back of unit injector hydraulic pump (1). The fuel transfer pump pushes pressurized fuel out of the outlet port and the fuel transfer pump draws new fuel into the inlet port. Fuel is drawn from fuel tank (12) and flows through two micron fuel filter (11) . Fuel flows from fuel filter (11) to the inlet .

PhET Moving Man 1. Set velocity to 0.5 0m/s 3. Set velocity to 2.0 0m/s 2. Set velocity to 1.00m /s 4. Set velocity to 3.0 0m/s 5. Set velocity to 4.0 0m/s 6. Set velocity to 10.00m /s Part 1 Directions: Before each run hit the button, set values and to make the man move Then DRAW the Position, Velocity and Acceleration graphs!

VPL Lab ah-Velocity Bats 1 Rev 9/18/14 Name School _ Date Velocity: A Bat's Eye View of Velocity PURPOSE There are a number of useful ways of modeling (representing) motion. . (initial velocity) tool and Go button to launch the cart at a known positive or negative velocity. 4. Change the color of the lines drawn on the graph.

Velocity histogram: Histogram of the velocities of the objects. Range interval: Size of the interval for the Velocity histogram. Show Info shows the maximum and minimum velocity. With this two values the velocity range can be computed. (Max Velocity - Min Velocity). The entered value must be divisible by the velocity range without remainder. 12

MIRO NASA Center for Space Expl oration and Technology Research . Previous work in LOX/CH4 Torch Igniters . oxygen Hydrogen and air Diesel and oxy-enriched air n-Heptane and oxy-enriched air Temperature, K 2800 3000 3200 2300 2550 2800-3000 2570 Gas velocity Mach 0.7

Albert woodfox Arthur Kinoy Award A Message from NYU PILC At every NLG #Law4thePeople Convention, we honor members and friends of the Guild whose exemplary work and activism capture the spirit of “law for the people,” and speak to the Guild’s philosophy of human rights over property interests. Please join us in congratulating our 2016 honorees! Workshops Tentative Schedule Felon .