NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS

2y ago
5 Views
2 Downloads
372.80 KB
24 Pages
Last View : 5m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Javier Atchley
Transcription

TMENT OF COMMCEDEPERARNOAA Technical Memorandum NMFSEEDRITICUNAJULY 2010STAT E S O F AMSERIOUS INJURY DETERMINATIONS FOR CETACEANS CAUGHTIN HAWAII LONGLINE FISHERIES DURING 1994-2008K. A. FORNEYNOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-462U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCENational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Marine Fisheries ServiceSouthwest Fisheries Science Center

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970,has evolved into an agency that establishes national policies and manages andconserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources. An organizationalelement within NOAA, the Office of Fisheries is responsible for fisheries policy andthe direction of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).In addition to its formal publications, the NMFS uses the NOAA TechnicalMemorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications whencomplete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible.Documents within this series, however, reflect sound professional work and may bereferenced in the formal scientific and technical literature.

NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFSICThis TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or specialpurpose information. The TMs have not received complete formal review, editorial control, or detailed editing.RCEEANNATIO NAL OCSU.DED ATMOSPHERTRATIONNI SMIADICANMEPARTMOMENT OF CJULY 2010SERIOUS INJURY DETERMINATIONS FOR CETACEANS CAUGHTIN HAWAII LONGLINE FISHERIES DURING 1994-2008K. A. FORNEYNational Oceanic & Atmospheric AdministrationNational Marine Fisheries ServiceSouthwest Fisheries Science CenterProtected Resources Division110 Shaffer RoadSanta Cruz, California, USA 95060NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-462U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEGary F. Locke, SecretaryNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationJane Lubchenco, Undersecretary for Oceans and AtmosphereNational Marine Fisheries ServiceEric C. Schwaab, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

Serious-injury determinations for cetaceans caughtin Hawaii longline fisheries during 1994-2008Karin A. ForneyProtected Resources DivisionSouthwest Fisheries Science CenterNational Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060Karin.Forney@noaa.govINTRODUCTIONThis document summarizes observer data on the mortality and injury of cetaceans in Hawaiibased pelagic longline fisheries for tuna (deep-set fishery) and swordfish (shallow-set fishery)during the most recent 5-year period (2004-2008) and re-evaluates all 1994-2008 cetaceanserious-injury determinations in these two fisheries on a case-by-case basis using the new criteriadeveloped at the 2007 Serious Injury Technical Workshop (Appendix A; reprinted fromAndersen et al. 2008). Regulations in place since 2004 require 100% observer coverage for theshallow-set fishery, so the reported cetacean deaths and injuries for 2004-2008 represent the totalnumber of takes in the fishery. Observer coverage for the deep-set fishery is currently requiredto be at least 20% annually, so the number of reported deaths and injuries for 2004-2008 are asample of fleet-wide bycatch. Total bycatch estimates by U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone areaand cetacean stock area are presented elsewhere (McCracken and Forney 2010).METHODSFor annual reporting purposes, and to maintain consistency with bycatch estimation procedures(e.g. Forney and McCracken 2008, McCracken and Forney 2008, McCracken and Forney 2010),marine mammal interactions were considered to have taken place during the calendar year inwhich the fishing vessel returned to port. Electronic data on marine mammal interactions wereextracted from the Pacific Islands Region (PIR) Longline Observer Data System (LODS) usingthe Datatrawler interface. Copies of relevant observer forms, photos and videos that describemarine mammal identification characteristics, the nature of the interaction, details on any injuriessustained by the animals, and the amount and type of gear left on the animal upon release were1

also obtained and reviewed. When a cetacean species (or genus for Kogia spp.) could not beidentified by the at-sea observer, PIR Observer program codes UC (unidentified cetacean), UW(unidentified whale), and UD (unidentified dolphin) were initially recorded by the observer.These codes were combined into a single unidentified cetacean (‘UC’) category for the thisreport (Table 1), but candidate species were evaluated based on the observer’s descriptions,photographs, sketches, and videos (when available). Animals that were determined to be eitherfalse killer whales or short-finned pilot whales were re-assigned species code ‘BF’ (‘blackfish’),and unidentified beaked whales were re-assigned code ‘ZU’ (Table 2). Geographic locations forall cetacean takes are plotted based on the reported catch location, if available; otherwise the haulbegin location is plotted. The EEZ area designations in Table 2 were derived by McCracken andForney (2010), either as the capture location (if known) or as the modal location of set begin, setend, haul begin, and haul end.Serious-injury determinations have previously been made (Forney and Kobayashi 2007, Forneyand McCracken 2008, McCracken and Forney 2008) using the guidelines developed in Anglissand DeMaster (1998) following a 1997 workshop on determining serious injuries in marinemammals. During 2007, new information on injuries to marine mammals was reviewed at aSerious Injury Technical Workshop, resulting in the development of new criteria (Table 1 inAndersen et al. 2008; included below as Appendix A). Based on these new injury determinationcriteria, all 1994-2008 cetacean injuries sustained in interactions with Hawaii-based longlinefisheries were reviewed to re-assess the severity of injury. The new determinations werecompared to those previously obtained using the Angliss and DeMaster (1998) criteria. In caseswhere a determination could not be made based on the available information, the severity wasprorated based on other determinations for that species or species group (see Forney andKobayashi 2007).RESULTS & DISCUSSIONCetacean species observed taken during 2004-2008In the deep-set fishery (Figure 1), 48 cetaceans were reported hooked or entangled during 20042008 (see Table 1 for scientific names and codes used in figures and tables): 19 false killerwhales, 8 short-finned pilot whales, 5 Risso’s dolphin, 1 pantropical spotted dolphin, 1 striped2

dolphin, 1 common bottlenose dolphin, 1 humpback whale, and 1 Blainville’s beaked whale.Eleven additional cetaceans that could not be identified to species were also recorded. Six ofthese were determined to have been either false killer whales or short-finned pilot whales(‘blackfish’) based on the available identification characteristics, one was either a blackfish or aRisso’s dolphin, and one was an unidentified beaked whale (Table 2). Insufficient informationwas available to evaluate potential species for the remaining four unidentified cetaceans.In the shallow-set fishery (Figure 2), 22 cetaceans were hooked or entangled during 2004-2008:10 Risso’s dolphins; 4 common bottlenose dolphins, 2 humpback whales, 1 Bryde’s whale, 1false killer whale; 1 striped dolphin, 1 pygmy or dwarf sperm whale, Kogia sp., and 2unidentified cetaceans. One of the unidentified cetaceans was determine to be either a falsekiller whale or short-finned pilot whale (‘blackfish’, Table 2).Serious-Injury Determinations, 1994-2008During the most recent year (2008), one Risso's dolphin and one pantropical spotted dolphinreported were dead upon gear retrieval. The remaining 19 animals taken during 2008 werereported to be alive but injured. Using either set of serious-injury determination criteria (Anglissand DeMaster 1998; Anderson et al. 2008), five animals were determined to be not seriouslyinjured and 14 seriously injured (Table 2).A review of all previous (1994-2007) injurydeterminations using the Andersen et al. 2008 criteria resulted in a change for 9 of 88 injuries(10.2%). In all cases the revised analysis determined the injury to have been more severe thanthe original analysis: five injuries changed from not serious to serious, two injuries changed from‘Cannot be determined’ (CBD) to serious (shaded cells in Table 2), and two injuries ofhumpback whales changed from not serious to CBD. The latter two cases were subsequentlyreviewed by a team of whale experts within the Alaska Scientific Review Group. As a result ofthis review, the September 2002 interaction was determined to be non-serious, and the February2004 interaction remained CBD and was prorated as non-serious based on the other deep-setfishery interactions with humpback whales, using the methods described in Forney andKobayashi (2007). Summaries of cetacean deaths, serious injuries and non-serious injuriesduring the most recent five complete years (2004-2008) are presented by species, year, and EEZarea in Table 3 (deep-set fishery) and Table 4 (shallow-set fishery) to aid in updating Hawaiiancetacean stock assessment reports.3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSMany thanks to the on-board observers who collected these data, and the staff of the PacificIslands Region and Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center who assisted with the extraction ofobserver data and provided copies of relevant data forms, especially Kevin Busscher, John Kelly,Eric Forney, and Jan Pappas. Marti McCracken provided location data for all cetacean takes.An earlier draft of this report was reviewed and improved by comments from Jamie Marchetti,and Jay Barlow, and the members of the Pacific Scientific Review Group.LITERATURE CITEDAndersen, M. S., K. A. Forney, T. V. N. Cole, T. Eagle, R. Angliss, K. Long, L. Barre, L. VanAtta, D. Borggaard, T. Rowles, B. Norberg, J. Whaley, and L. Engleby. 2008.Differentiating Serious and Non-Serious Injury of Marine Mammals: Report of theSerious Injury Technical Workshop, 10-13 September 2007, Seattle, Washington. NOAATechnical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-39. 94p.Chivers, S. J., Forney K. A., Johnston, D. 2008. Rationale for the 2008 revision to Hawaiianstock boundaries for false killer whales, Pseudorca crassidens. SWFSC AdministrativeReport LJ-08-04. Available from SWFSC, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA92037. 5p.Forney, K.A. and D. R. Kobayashi. 2007. Updated estimates of mortality and injury of cetaceansin the Hawaii-based longline fisheries, 1994-2005. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SWFSC412. 30p.Forney, K. A. and McCracken, M. 2008. Preliminary estimates of cetacean injury and mortalityin Hawaii-based longline fisheries during 2006.Draft document PSRG-2008-16presented to the Pacific Scientific Review Group, January 8-10, 2008, Monterey, CA.McCracken, M. and K.A. Forney. 2008. Preliminary estimates of cetacean injury and mortalityin Hawaii-based longline fisheries during 2007.Draft document PSRG-2008-11presented to the Pacific Scientific Review Group, November 19-21, 2008, Kihei, Maui,Hawaii. 9p.4

McCracken M. L. and K. A. Forney 2010. Preliminary assessment of incidental interactions withmarine mammals in the Hawaii longline deep and shallow set fisheries. PIFSC WorkingPaper WP-10-001. Available from NOAA, NMFS, Pacific Islands Fisheries ScienceCenter, 2570 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822-2396. 27p.5

Table 1. List of cetacean species codes, common names, and scientific names.CodeCommon NameScientific nameBEBryde's whaleBalaenoptera edeniBF'Blackfish' PC or GMDDCommon dolphinDelphinus spp.GGRisso's dolphinGrampus griseusGMShort-finned pilot whaleGlobicephala macrorhynchusMDBlainville's beaked whaleMesoplodon densirostrisMNHumpback whaleMegaptera novaeangliaePCFalse killer whalePseudorca crassidensPMSperm whalePhyseter macrocephalusSAPantropical spotted dolphinStenella attenuataSCStriped dolphinStenella coeruleoalbaSLSpinner dolphinStenella longirostrisTTCommon bottlenose dolphinTursiops truncatusUCUnidentified cetacean (includes Observer Program codes UC, UW and UD)UKPygmy or dwarf sperm whaleKogia sp.ZUUnidentified beaked whaleZiphiid whale6

Table 2. Comparison of case-specific serious-injury determinations for cetaceans taken in Hawaii-based longline fisheries, 19942008, using (A) previous criteria (Angliss and DeMaster 1998) and (B) revised criteria (Table 1 in Andersen et al. 2008, Appendix A).Shading indicates injuries for which determinations differed. CBD cannot be determined. Prorated injury determinations are fromForney and Kobayashi (2007) and Forney and McCracken (2008). Fishery codes for 1994-2001: T tuna targeting deep sets, S swordfish targeting shallow sets, M mixed type; for 2002-2007: DS deep-set fishery, SS shallow-set fishery. Hawaii (P) andHawaii (I) indicate takes of false killer whales or potential false killer whales that were within the range of the Pelagic Stock or InsularStock of false killer whales, respectively, as described in Forney et al. (2010). Species codes are defined in Table 1.AndersenRecorded(A)(B)et al. 2008AnimalPreviousRevisedInjury determination criteria / CommentsTable 1condition Determination 7PCPCInjuredSOutside199820-Jan-98UCGG, CGGUCGMBF, GG,TT, ZUTTGGPMBF, eriousCBD (prorated CBD (proratedserious)serious)Not SeriousNot SeriousDeadDeadSeriousSeriousSeriousSeriousNot SeriousNot SeriousSeriousSeriousCBD (prorated CBD (proratedserious)serious)107726n/a1 or 7726Swam away slowly with hook and some lineattachedHooked in flukeLine tangled around caudal peduncleHooked in mouth / hook ingestedHooked in mouthHooked in fluke1 or 7Hooked in mouth / hook ingested--SeriousSerious1 or 7Not SeriousSerious10CBD (prorated CBD ousNot SeriousNot eriousSerious7Hooked; released with 20m of line attachedHooked in mouthHooked in mouth171171141 or 7HookedHooked in mouth / hook ingestedHooked/Tangled, broke line with gear remainingNo injury details availableHook ingestedHooked in mouthEntangled, apparently got freeHooked in mouthHook ingestedFloat line wrapped around tailHooked in mouth / hook ingested

Table 2. (Continued)AndersenRecorded(A)(B)et al. 2008AnimalPreviousRevisedInjury determination criteria / CommentsTable 1condition Determination e200008-Oct-00UCBF, dCBD (prorated CBD (proratedHookedserious)serious)DeadDeadn/aHooked in mouthNot seriousSerious7 or 8, (10) Hooked in head/beak; line cutNot SeriousNot InjuredSeriousSerious14, redInjuredDeadInjuredSeriousSeriousDeadNot SeriousSeriousSeriousDeadNot Serious77n/a11DSPalmyra20022-Jul-2002UCInjuredNot l-200219-Sep-2002PCPCPCPCMDUCSA, SL,GG, TCBD (prorated CBD (proratedserious)serious)SeriousSeriousLine around fluke, released with minimal lineattached-Hooked7Hooked in mouthSerious10Hooked, tangled dropper lines between twoadjacent floats, crew cut lineSeriousSerious7?,10Not SeriousNot Serious11CBD (prorated CBD (proratedserious)serious)Not SeriousNot SeriousSeriousSerious8117PC 'on hook'; broke dropper line; hook and lineattached when broke freeEntangled in substantial line and & 2 floats; freeditself from gear before swimming awayHookedEntangled, appeared to break free of lineHooked in mouthEntangled in mainline with several floats in sizabletangle; mainline snappedLine wrapped around beakHooked ; released by cutting leader line; 3ft monoline, weight, 6" wire leader and hook remainedattachedHooked in mouthHooked in mouthHooked in flukeHooked; swam away with no gear attachedHooked in body/tail & entangled; broke freeHooked in mouthHook ingested

Table 2. A)(B)et al. 2008AnimalPreviousRevisedInjury determination criteria / CommentsTable 1condition Determination njuredNot SeriousCBD / dDeadn/aDSHawaii(P)20039-Apr-2003UCSA, SL,GG, TT,BF, sSerious7DSDSHawaii(I)Hawaii(I)30' mainline wrapped around fluke;*Andersen et al. 2008 criteria suggest the outcomecannot be determined; however, during additionalexpert review by three members of the AlaskaScientific Review Group, this was unanimouslyconsidered a non-serious injury.Entangled; mainline and branchline wrapped aroundflukesHooked; released with 10m trailing line on 3manimalReleased with two 13-m branchlines around bodyHooked in dNot SeriousCBD (proratednot SeriousSerious7 or 8, ep-2004PCPCInjuredNot SeriousNot Serious7Hooked in mouth, hook pulled juredSeriousNot SeriousSeriousNot Serious111Hook ingestedLine came off whale after mainline cutDSDSSSSSHawaii(P)Hawaii(P)OutsideOutside9Hooked in the mouth, released with 20ft trailinglineHooked in mouth or pectoral fin; released trailing12m lineHooked in mouth (hook embedded next to tooth);released trailing 0.5m lineEntangled (probably pectorals or flukes); releasedwith line and buoy attached. **Followingadditional expert review by three members of theAlaska Scientific Review Group, the injury severityremained CBD and was prorated.Hooked in head/beak/mouth; released trailingunknown amount of lineHook ingested; released with 2 ft of trailing lineEntangled around body, released entangled and with 4 m of trailing lineHooked in jaw

Table 2. (Continued)AndersenRecorded(A)(B)et al. 2008AnimalPreviousRevisedInjury determination criteria / CommentsTable 1condition Determination ousNot SeriousSeriousSeriousNot SeriousSerious14117,10Released with two wraps of mono around headFreed itself from gear after line cutHooked in mouth, gear from snap to hook erious14,10DSHawaii(I)200521-Oct-2005UCBFIn

presented to the Pacific Scientific Review Group, January 8-10, 2008, Monterey, CA. McCracken, M. and K.A. Forney. 2008. Preliminary estimates of cetacean injury and mortality in Hawaii-based longline fisheries during 2007. Draft document PSRG-2008-11 presented to the Pacific Scientific Rev

Related Documents:

noaa technical memorandum nmfs-sefsc-412 . few turtleis, many problems: the difficulties for the sea turtle c0nservatic)n in veneziueila . luanne lockwood, and paul a. klein . 61 1995 - the hurricane season of the century, buck

To conserve power, the radio can be turned off, set to NOAA standby, NOAA mute, or NOAA off modes instead of NOAA on. NOTE Leaving the radio in NOAA on mode will consume substantially more power. To save power, it is recommended that the WR103NX be on NOAA standby when the user is not listening to rad

NOAA has also announced publi cationofthe 44-pagepaper-boundbook let, "So You Bought a Boat," by Robert E. Williams, a NOAA com missioned officer. A limited edition was published last year under the Uni versity of Washington Sea Grant Pro gram. As a regular NOAA publication, the booklet will receive much wider distribution and provide .

NOAA Highlights and Activities AIS & NOAA’s Habitat Blueprint Focus Areas HACCP updates NOAA AIS Team Workshop on west coast Week of March 30th, 2015 in Santa Cruz, California National Marine Sanctuaries Lionfish Plan NOAA AIS Month in July—posted articles & presentations offered wrt AIS matt

The current Fitness Report for Commissioned Officers, NOAA Form 56-6, will be replaced by the NOAA Officer Evaluation Report (OER), NOAA Form 56-6A. The Director, NOAA Corps requested the Commissioned Personnel Center to review the current Officer Evaluation System and provide recommendations regarding the status of the current

The First Edition of the National Bycatch Report (NMFS 2011) documented bycatch estimates, using observer data and self-reported logbook data, for all fisheries for which this information was available in 2005. NMFS completed Update 1 (NMFS 2013a) in late 2013 and published it online in early 2014.

Brinson, A.A. and E. M. Thunberg 2013. The Economic Performance of U.S. Catch Share Programs. U.S. Dept. of Commer., NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-133, 160 p. Copies of this report may be obtained from: Rita Curtis, Ph.D. Office of Science and Technology National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 1315 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910

Confidential Information Memorandum June 30, 2011 Sample Industries, Inc. (Not a real company.) Prepared by: John Smith, CPA Middle Market Business Advisors 500 North Michigan Ave. Chicago, IL. 60600 This Memorandum is confidential and private. Distribution is restricted.File Size: 211KBPage Count: 16Explore furtherInformation Memorandum Disclaimer - Free Template Sample .lawpath.com.auConfidential Information Memorandum (CIM): Detailed Guide .www.mergersandinquisitions.comInformation Memorandum Template for Investors Property .businessplans.com.auRecommended to you b