The Sustainability Assessment Of Food And Agriculture .

3y ago
22 Views
2 Downloads
4.68 MB
268 Pages
Last View : 17d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Roy Essex
Transcription

SAFASUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE SYSTEMSGUIDELINESVERSION 3.0

EWATERATMOSPHERNAERNDLANSIALTER GYAM YAANIMAL WELFARETH &EAL FETYHNSAMAINVEVUYDECENTLIVELIHOODNOMFAIRTRPRAC ADINGTICESHTRIGURBOLAABILITYOL ECOIERNTECLOCAALLNYLITUA NT Q IOUC ATOD RMPR NMFLRTHUEOPAACCICHOLIST NTEMEMANAGCERULNENSOC

SAFASUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE SYSTEMSGUIDELINESVERSION 3.0FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - ROME 2014

The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not implythe expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of theUnited Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or areaor of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specificcompanies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply thatthese have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are notmentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.ISBN 978-92-5-108485-4 (print)E-ISBN 978-92-5-108486-1 (PDF) FAO, 2014FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Exceptwhere otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, researchand teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriateacknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement ofusers’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights shouldbe made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to copyright@fao.org. FAO informationproducts are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased throughpublications-sales@fao.org.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSSAFA is an initiative led by Nadia El-Hage Scialabba, Natural ResourcesManagement and Environment Department; thanks go to Alexander Muellerfor his continuous support and to the Government of Switzerland for the kindfinancial assistance.The draft Sustainability Framework was first defined through a FAO cooperation withthe ISEAL Alliance and an expert meeting held in 2009; thanks go to Sasha Courville,Elisabeth Guttenstein and Jonathan Loh for their collaboration during this phase.The Test Version 1.0 of the SAFA Guidelines was released on the occasion of theUnited Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in June 2012. It was shapedby stakeholders’ surveys, an expert meeting held in 2011 and two electronic publicconsultations held in 2011 and 2012; thanks go to Jan Grenz and his team for the write-up,including Julia Jawtusch, Madeleine Kaufmann, Christian Schader, Susanne Stalder andChristian Thalmann.The Test Version 1.1 of the SAFA Guidelines was benchmarked against majorsustainability tools and piloted in 30 settings in 2012-13; thanks go Sally Lee and NoémiNemes for their backstopping and coordination of this process.The Draft SAFA Guidelines (version 2.0) was prepared following a practitioners andpartners meeting held in 2013; thanks go to Elisabeth Henderson, Cristina Larrea, Sally Lee,Noémi Nemes, Aimee Russillo, Michael Sligh and John Stansfield for their contributions.The SAFA Guidelines (version 3.0) are produced following a peer-review and additionalprovision of expertise; thanks go to Marta Bentancur, Giulia Bernini, Gabriella Bianchi,Cécile Brugère, Doug Kneeland and Jon Manhire for their inputs.Last but not least, thanks go to the several hundred individuals who providedtheir knowledge and insights on the occasion of the different SAFA events, includingsustainability concerned par tners in academia, associations, food industr y,multi-stakeholder organizations, as well as within the UN system and FAO.SAFA GUIDELINES - version 3 .0iii

PREFACEMore than two decades have passed since the principle of sustainabledevelopment received nearly universal agreement at the 1992 Earth Summit.As of today, 106 countries have established national sustainable developmentstrategies and related sustainability reporting, as evidenced by national reports to theCommission on Sustainable Development. Furthermore, over 120 voluntary sustainabilitystandards, eco-labels, codes of conduct and audit protocols are referenced on the StandardsMap of the International Trade Centre. World over, there is an increasing user demand forpractical tools to support decision-making processes regarding the use of sustainabilitytools in business operations. However, there is no single framework that integrates allaspects of sustainability and sadly, sustainability objectives are deteriorating in all spheresof development, as witnessed by multiple environmental, social and economic crisis.The hundreds different sustainability frameworks developed in the last decades byuniversities, civil society, corporations and national and international institutions, rangefrom environmental and social standards to corporate social responsibility and codes ofgood practices that apply to operational units or specific supply chains, with or withoutlabelling. This expansion of sustainability tools and various claims place a burden onproducers and traders and frustrate consumers in the market place. In addition, theimplementation of an integrated approach to analyzing all sustainability dimensions asa coherent whole, and integrating them into business or development strategies, remainsa major challenge.Global trade and the governance of inter-state externalities on public goods (e.g.climate, biodiversity, food safety, financial stability), compounded by the proliferationof sustainability schemes, call for a multi-party cooperation that must be supported by“common rules” in order to reduce fragmentation, prevent conflicts, mitigate uncertaintyand build capacities for effective sustainability. More accurate data and sound guidingprinciples to establish a common basis for assessing sustainability is needed. Tacklingthese challenges requires, among other things, a common language for sustainability,as well as a holistic approach to assessment and implementation that considers thecomplexity and relationships of all dimensions of sustainability. While there is now a wideawareness of the sustainability concept, there is also wide interpretation of the definitionsivSAFA GUIDELINES - version 3 .0

and components of sustainability based on different disciplines and political beliefs andvalues. There is need to measure what matters; the dilemma is to measure what mattersto whom and how?SAFA is a holistic global framework for the assessment of sustainability along foodand agriculture value chains. SAFA establishes an international reference for assessingtrade-offs and synergies between all dimensions of sustainability. It has been preparedso that enterprises, whether companies or small-scale producers, involved with theproduction, processing, distribution and marketing of goods have a clear understandingof the constituent components of sustainability and how strength, weakness and progresscould be tackled. By providing a transparent and aggregated framework for assessingsustainability, SAFA seeks to harmonize sustainability approaches within the food valuechain, as well as furthering good practices.These Guidelines are the result of five years of participatory development, togetherwith practitioners from civil society and private sector. The Guidelines are the resultof an iterative process, built on the cross-comparisons of codes of practice, corporatereporting, standards, indicators and other technical protocols currently used by privatesector, governments, not-for-profits and multi-stakeholder organizations that reference orimplement sustainability tools. SAFA builds on, and acknowledges, existing sustainabilitytools, with the goal of integrating and relating current systems.The Guidelines are produced in the same spirit of codes of practice, guidelines and otherrecommended measures to assist in achieving sustainable and fair practices in food andagriculture production and trade. Because existing schemes remain fragmented on whatconstitutes a sustainable food and agriculture system, SAFA aims to fill the gap betweenspecific sustainability tools, while fostering partnerships for the long-term transformationof food systems.The target audience of a SAFA assessment is small, medium and large-scale companies,organizations and other stakeholders that participate in crop, livestock, forestry, aquacultureand fishery value chains. However, as a framework and harmonized global assessmentapproach, SAFA is also relevant to governments’ strategies, policy and planning.The guiding vision of SAFA is that food and agriculture systems worldwide arecharacterized by four dimensions of sustainability: good governance, environmentalintegrity, economic resilience and social well-being. For each of these four dimensions ofsustainability, SAFA outlines essential elements of sustainability based on internationalreference documents and conventions. The 21 themes and 58 sub-themes were definedSAFA GUIDELINES - version 3 .0v

through expert consultations. Default performance indicators for each sub-theme facilitatemeasuring progress towards sustainability. SAFA assessment involves adaptation togeographic, sector-specific and individual conditions of the assessed entity and thecomprehensive use of existing documentation, standards and tools.The SAFA Guidelines consist of three sections: Section 1 describes the purpose, linkages,principles and scope of SAFA; Section 2 outlines the procedure of SAFA implementation;Section 3 contains the SAFA protocol for sustainability themes and sub-themes. Defaultindicators sheets, providing guidance and references can be found in this publicationcomplement entitled SAFA Indicators; these will be subject to periodic reviews, as learningis gained during the Guidelines’ implementation.The SAFA Guidelines are provided by FAO. They are publicly available and nolicense fees may be charged for their use. The correct application of the Guidelines is theresponsibility of the implementing enterprise. FAO is neither liable nor responsible forconsequences of using the SAFA Guidelines.FAO is also making publicly available an electronic SAFA Tool, with a view to assistusers in implementation of the Guidelines. The Tool and other SAFA resources are freelydownloadable from: y-assessments-safaviSAFA GUIDELINES - version 3 .0

TABLE OF CONTENTSAcknowledgements .iiiPreface .ivTable of Contents .viiAbbreviations .ixSECTION ONE. FRAMEWORK.1Purpose of SAFA .2SAFA Vision .2What is SAFA about? .3Who are the Guidelines aimed at? .5The objectives of SAFA Guidelines .6Use of SAFA results .7The SAFA framework .8Landscape of sustainability initiatives .8SAFA linkages with other sustainability tools.8Background and rationale .12Sustainable development progress and challenges .12Need for a common language .13SAFA principles.14Scope of a SAFA assessment .16Supply chain scope: setting the boundaries .16Temporal scope: defining the time frame .19Thematic scope: defining the sustainability context .19The Guide: how to use it .21SECTION TWO. PROCEDURES .23SAFA Overview .24Step 1. MappingSetting goals and scope .25Setting Goals .25Setting scope and boundaries .26Small-scale producers and SAFA .34Step 2. Contextualization .38Contextualizing sub-themes .39Contextualizing default indicators .40Step 3. Selecting tools and indicators .45Selecting appropriate tools and data collection .45Determining the Accuracy Score .49Selecting indicators and rating thresholds .55Determinating thresholds .59Rating sub-themes in the environmental dimension .61Rating at the theme level .66SAFA GUIDELINES - version 3 .0vii

Step 4. Reporting .68Visualization .68The final report .70Critical review .70Sharing of results .71Use of results .71SECTION THREE. SUSTAINABILITY PROTOCOL .75Overview of sustainability dimensions and constituent components .76Sustainability Theme protocols .78GOOD GOVERNANCE.79Theme G1 – Corporate Ethics .81Theme G2 – Accountability .85Theme G3 – Participation .90Theme G4 – Rule of Law .96Theme G5 – Holistic Management .104ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY .108Theme E1 – Atmosphere .

T E C O N O M Y S O C I A L. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - ROME 2014 SAFA SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS GUIDELINES VERSION 3.0. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Food outlets which focused on food quality, Service quality, environment and price factors, are thè valuable factors for food outlets to increase thè satisfaction level of customers and it will create a positive impact through word ofmouth. Keyword : Customer satisfaction, food quality, Service quality, physical environment off ood outlets .

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.