Guidance For Developing Quality Systems For Environmental .

2y ago
15 Views
2 Downloads
526.31 KB
114 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Luis Wallis
Transcription

United StatesEnvironmental ProtectionAgencyOffice of EnvironmentalInformationWashington, DC 20460EPA/240/R-02/008November 2002Guidance for DevelopingQuality Systems forEnvironmental ProgramsytilauQEPA QA/G-1

FOREWORDThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an Agency-wide program ofquality systems for environmental data. EPA’s Quality System requires documentation of bothmanagement and technical activities. This document, Guidance for Developing EPA Quality Systemsfor Environmental Programs, provides methods and tools for developing and documenting theelements of a functional quality system. It is pertinent to organizations that carry out environmental dataoperations within or for EPA.This document helps organizations design a structured management system for ensuring qualityin its work processes, products, and services. The EPA’s Quality System has been built to ensure thatenvironmental programs are supported by the type and quality of data needed for their appropriate use.As required by the EPA Quality Manual for Environmental Programs, Order 5360 A1 (EPA,2000a), this document is valid for up to five years from the official date of publication. After five years,this document will be reissued without change, revised, or withdrawn from the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency Quality System Series documents.This document provides guidance to EPA employees and other organizations involved in qualitysystem development. It does not impose legally binding requirements on EPA or the public and maynot apply to a particular situation based on the circumstances. EPA retains the discretion to adoptapproaches on a case-by-case basis that differ from this guidance where appropriate. Interestedparties are free to raise questions about the recommendations in this document and the appropriatenessof using them in a particular situation, and EPA and other parties should consider whether therecommendations in the document are appropriate for the particular situation. EPA may periodicallyrevise this guidance without public notice.This document is one of the EPA Quality System Series documents, which describe policiesand procedures for planning, implementing, and assessing the effectiveness of a quality system.Questions regarding this document or other EPA Quality System Series documents can be directed to:U.S. EPAQuality Staff (2811R)1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.Washington, D.C. 20460Phone: (202) 564-6830Fax: (202) 565-2441e-mail: quality@epa.govCopies of EPA Quality System Series documents may be obtained from the Quality Staff directly orby downloading them from its Home Page, www.epa.gov/quality.EPA QA/G-1iFinalNovember 2002

EPA QA/G-1iiFinalNovember 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS1.0PageINTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.1PURPOSE AND SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.2SUPERSESSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.3PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.4HOW TO USE THIS GUIDANCE DOCUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.0ELEMENTS OF A QUALITY SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.1THE EPA QUALITY SYSTEM MODEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.1.1 Specifications for EPA Organizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.1.2 Specifications for Non-EPA Organizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.2QUALITY SYSTEM STANDARDS AND MODELS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102.2.1 Elements of the ANSI/ASQC E4-1994 Quality System Standard . . . . . . . . 102.2.2 Other Quality System Standards and Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103.0HOW TO DEVELOP A QUALITY SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133.1OVERVIEW OF THE QUALITY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS . . . . . 133.1.1 Quality Systems for Small Organizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143.2INITIATION ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163.2.1 Senior Management Commitment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163.2.2 Quality System Development Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173.2.3 Establish Quality Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203.2.4 Analyze Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213.2.5 Inventory Existing Quality Procedures and Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223.2.6 Obtain Management Approvals, Resources for Development . . . . . . . . . . . 233.3DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253.3.1 Assign Tasks and Develop Detailed Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263.3.2 Analyze Work Processes Using a Quality System Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273.3.3 Write Standard Operating Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293.3.4 Write a Quality Management Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313.3.5 Develop Supporting Systems and Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333.3.6 Conduct Detailed Compliance Audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333.3.7 Obtain Management Approvals and Resources for Implementation . . . . . . . 343.4IMPLEMENTATION AND START-UP ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353.4.1 Determine the Implementation Strategy and Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363.4.2 Publish and Distribute Quality Management Plan andQuality Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383.4.3 Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38EPA QA/G-1iiiFinalNovember 2002

3.5Page3.4.4 Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403.4.5 Establish a Program for Recognizing Quality Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413.4.6 Initiate Quality Procedures and Maintain Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413.4.7 Conduct Periodic Internal Quality System Audits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423.4.8 Corrective Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433.4.9 Identify Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44ONGOING MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453.5.1 Allocate Resources per the Budget Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453.5.2 Conduct Routine Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463.5.3 Implement Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463.5.4 Conduct Periodic Self-Assessment of this Quality System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473.5.5 Maintain Quality Training, Communications, and Recognition and RewardsPrograms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474.0CASE STUDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514.1QUALITY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN AN ENVIRONMENTALCONSULTING FIRM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514.1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514.1.2 Initiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524.1.3 Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 564.1.4 Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594.1.5 On-going Maintenance and Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 604.2QUALITY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN AN EPA REGULATORYPROGRAM: SIX-YEAR REVIEW OF NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKINGWATER STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 614.2.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 614.2.2 Initiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 624.2.3 Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 624.2.4 Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 634.2.5 On-going Maintenance and Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 645.0TOOLS AND METHODS USED IN DEVELOPING QUALITY SYSTEMS . . . . . . 675.1INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 675.2STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES TEMPLATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 675.3QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 685.4QUALITY MANUALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 695.5DOCUMENT CONTROL AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS . . . . 715.6QUALITY SYSTEM COMPLIANCE CHECKLISTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 725.7PROCESS ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT TOOLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72EPA QA/G-1ivFinalNovember 2002

5.7.15.7.25.7.35.7.45.7.55.7.6APPENDIX A:APPENDIX B:APPENDIX C:APPENDIX D:EPA QA/G-1PageProcess Flow Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72Control Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73Cause-and-Effect (Fishbone) Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74Pareto Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74Benchmarking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76Scheduling Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79QUALITY SYSTEM CHECKLIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1QUALITY ASSURANCE CONCEPTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1GLOSSARY OF TERMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1vFinalNovember 2002

LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1.Figure 2.Figure 3.Figure 4.Figure 5.Figure 6.Figure 7.Figure 8.Figure 9.Figure 10.Figure 11.Figure 12.Figure 13.Figure 14.Figure 15.PageThe EPA Quality System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6A Four-Phase Process for Developing a Quality System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Initiating the Quality System (Phase 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Developing the Quality System (Phase 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26Standard Diagram of a Work Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28Implementing the Quality System (Phase 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36Ongoing Maintenance and Improvement (Phase 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46Quality System for the Six-Year Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63Data Sources for Occurrence and Exposure Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66Example of a Process Flow Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73Control Chart Showing a Process Under Statistical Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74Example of a Cause-and-Effect (Fishbone) Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75Example of a Pareto Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75Project Gantt Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80PERT Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80LIST OF TABLESTable 1.Table 2.Table 3.Table 4.Table 5.Table 6.Table 7.Table 8.Table 9.Table 10.EPA QA/G-1PageQuality-Related Regulations and Agreements by Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Agency-wide Internal and External Quality Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9Elements of the ANSI/ASQC E4-1994 Quality System Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Standards Relating to Quality Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Example General Schedule for Development of a Quality System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Example Detailed Schedule for Development of a Quality Management Plan . . . . . . 26Quality System Elements Required for the MRI Environmental Monitoring Group . . 53Assessment of Department Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57Sample Quality System Development Activities for the 2000 Six-Year Review . . . . 65Reasons for Benchmarking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79viFinalNovember 2002

LIST OF AQPSOCWPERTQAQCQSDTSDEPSOPEPA QA/G-1American National Standards Institute/American Society for QualityAmerican Society for Testing and MaterialsCode of Federal RegulationsEnvironmental Protection AgencyGovernment Printing OfficeInternational Organization for StandardizationMarine Research InstituteMeasurement and Testing EquipmentNational Primary Drinking Water RegulationsOffice of Air Quality Planning and StandardsOffice of Clean WaterProgram Evaluation and Review TechniqueQuality AssuranceQuality ControlQuality System Development TeamState Department of Environmental ProgramsStandard Operating ProceduresviiFinalNovember 2002

EPA QA/G-18FinalNovember 2002

CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.1PURPOSE AND SCOPEWhat does this guidance cover?This guidance document provides methods and tools to help organizations develop a qualitysystem that meets its internal organizational needs and complies with U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) requirements for quality systems. EPA’s policies for quality systems are outlined inEPA’s Policy and Program Requirements for the Mandatory Agency-wide Quality System, Order5360.1 A2 (EPA, 2000a); EPA Quality Manual for Environmental Programs, Manual 5360 A1(EPA, 2000b); and the Federal Regulations (48 CFR 46; 40 CFR 30, 31, and 35).Other general environmental quality system specifications applicable to EPA’s programs aredescribed in the American National Standards Institute/American Society for Quality (ANSI/ASQ) E41994, Specifications and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection andEnvironmental Technology Programs (ANSI/ASQ, 1995). This document outlines the basicguidelines for planning, implementing, and assessing a quality system for environmental data collectionand environmental technology. ANSI/ASQ’s standards apply to quality systems for air and waterquality monitoring, pollution control technology development, sampling and analysis for environmentalimpact studies, hazardous waste investigations, and a variety of other activities.What is a quality system?A quality system is the means by which an organization manages its quality aspects in asystematic, organized manner. It provides a framework for planning, implementing, and assessing workperformed by an organization and for carrying out required quality assurance (QA) and quality control(QC) activities. It encompasses a variety of technical and administrative elements, including:CCCCCEPA QA/G-1policies and objectives,organizational authority,responsibilities,accountability, andprocedures and practices.1FinalNovember 2002

What are the purpose and scope of the EPA Quality System?The EPA Quality System is a management system that provides the necessary elements to plan,implement, document, and assess the effectiveness of QA and QC activities applied to environmentalprograms conducted by or for EPA. The EPA Quality System encompasses the collection, evaluation,and use of environmental data by or for EPA, and the design, construction, and operation ofenvironmental technology by or for EPA. This includes environmental programs such as thedemonstration of environmental technology; investigation of chemical, biological, physical, orradioactive constituents; development, evaluation, and use of computer or mathematical models; use ofdata collected for other purposes or from other sources (also called secondary data); and the collectionand use of data pertaining to the occupational health and safety of personnel in EPA facilities. Exampleprograms are listed in Section 1.3 of the EPA Manual 5360 A1 (EPA, 2001b).What are the benefits of EPA's quality system?Successful implementation of the EPA Quality System leads to the benefits outlined below.CScientific Data Integrity—EPA will be better able to produce data of known anddocumented quality based on sound scientific principles.CReduced or Justifiable Resource Expenditures—Resource expenditures can be reducedif EPA's information needs are more closely matched to the information collection.Through proper planning, only the correct type, amount, and quality of data will becollected for EPA use.CProper Evaluation of Internal and External Activities—The EPA Quality Systemprovides documentation of activities and improved oversight for evaluation purposes.This reduces the potential for waste and abuse.CReliable and Defensible Decisions—When the quality of data are better known,determining whether the data can be used for a specific decision is facilitated. Thisreduces embarrassing surprises and challenges to regulations, permit appeals, etc.CBurden Reduction—As EPA better defines the data needed for a specific application,the burden on other organizations who are required to collect and/or report data toEPA may be reduced.Overall, implementation of the EPA Quality System will reduce the Agency's vulnerabilities and increaseEPA’s ability to make reliable, cost-effective, and defensible decisions.EPA QA/G-12FinalNovember 2002

Who should read this guidance?This document is intended for managers and quality professionals within EPA organizations(program offices, laboratories, and regional offices); states, tribal governments, recipients of externalassistance agreements; and EPA contractors.Is my organization required to follow this guidance?No. This is non-mandatory guidance intended to help organizations apply EPA policies andapply quality management concepts and best practices to their own circumstances. The processdescribed in this guidance for developing a quality system is only one of many possible approaches fordeveloping a quality system. While the general process described here should work for mostorganizations, the specific details will need to be tailored to each organization.How does this guidance document relate to other the EPA Quality System documents?This guidance describes a process for developing a quality system that follows EPA QualitySystem policies set forth in EPA Order 5360.1 A2 while also meeting the internal needs of anorganization. Consequently, this guidance addresses the organizational development processes andrelated tools that can be employed to establish a working quality system. Most of the other EPAQuality System Series documents focus on a specific managerial or technical element of the EPAQuality System, at either the organizational or project level. This guidance describes how anorganization assembles these elements into a coherent quality system. EPA QA/R-2 provides thespecifications for documenting the quality system.Where can I find more information?Additional documents, tools, training, and technical assistance are available through the EPAQuality Staff (see the Foreword for contact information). Many additional resources are available fordownloading at the Quality Staff website: www.epa.gov/quality.1.2SUPERSESSIONNo previous guidance on developing quality systems has been issued by the EPA QualitySystem staff. Therefore, this document does not supersede any other documents.EPA QA/G-13FinalNovember 2002

1.3PERIOD OF APPLICABILITYAs described in the EPA Quality Manual (5360 A1), this document will be valid for 5 yearsfrom the official date of publication. After 5 years, this document will either be reissued without change,revised, or withdrawn from the EPA Quality System.1.4HOW TO USE THIS GUIDANCE DOCUMENTIf you are interested in learning about.then readPrinciples underlying quality management and the core elements of aquality systemChapter 2Activities necessary to develop a quality system that meets yourorganization’s needsChapter 3An example of quality system development in a narrative case studyformatChapter 4Tools and methodologies that may help in the development of your qualitysystemChapter 5References and supplemental readingReferencesDefinitions of important quality management termsGlossaryEPA QA/G-14FinalNovember 2002

CHAPTER 2ELEMENTS OF A QUALITY SYSTEMThis chapter will answer the following questions:CCC2.1What are the components of the EPA Quality System?What are the requirements of the Quality System for EPA organizations?What are other Quality System standards that government agencies and privateorganizations need to consider?THE EPA QUALITY SYSTEM MODELThe EPA Quality System integrates management and technical activities for the planning,implementation, and assessment of environmental programs within the Agency’s mission and scope.The EPA’s Quality System has been designed to ensure that environmental programs are supported bythe type, quality, and quantity of data needed for their intended use. The EPA Quality Systemintegrates policy and procedures, organizational responsibilities, and individual accountability.The ANSI/ASQ E4-1994, Specifications and Guidelines for Quality Systems forEnvironmental Data Collection and Environmental Technology Programs (ANSI/ASQ, 1995)specifically defines a quality system as:.a structured and documented system describing the policies, objectives,principles, organizational authority, responsibilities, accountability, andimplementation plan of an organization for ensuring the quality in its workprocesses, products, items, and services. The quality system provides theframework for planning, implementing, and assessing work performed by theorganization and for carrying out required QA and QC.The EPA Quality System is depicted graphically in Figure 1. At the policy level, EPA’sprimary internal policy directives are EPA Policy and Program Requirements for the MandatoryAgency-wide Quality System, Order 5360.1 A2 (EPA, 2000b) and EPA Quality Manual forEnvironmental Programs, Manual 5360 A1 (EPA, 2000a), which are derived in part from nationaland international consensus standards on quality systems, as further explained below. EPArequirements affecting external organizations are reflected in regulations addressing contracts andassistance agreements. EPA program and regional offices establish policies that are consistentwith Agency-wide policies. At the organizational level, the quality system features documentation[written in a Quality Management Plan (QMP)], systems assessments (such as Management SystemsEPA QA/G-15FinalNovember 2002

POLICY/REGULATIONSConsensus StandardsANSI/ASQC E4ISO 9000 SeriesInternal PoliciesExternal RegulationsEPA Order 5360.1EPA Manual 5360Contracts - 48 CFR 46Assistance Agreements 40 CFR 30, 31, and 35ORGANIZATION/PROGRAMEPA Program &Regional PolicyQuality SystemDocumentation(e.g., QMP)Supporting System Elements(e.g., Procurements,Computer Hardware/Software)Training/Communication(e.g., Training Plan,Conferences)Annual Reviewand Planning(e.g., QAARWP)PROJECTSystematicPlanning(e.g., DQO Process)QAProject PlanPLANNINGSystemsAssessments(e.g., QSAs)Conduct alAssessmentsIMPLEMENTATIONData Verification& ValidationData QualityAssessmentASSESSMENTDefensible Products and DecisionsFigure 1. The EPA Quality SystemReviews or Quality System Audits), annual reviews and planning documents (written in the QA AnnualReport and Work Plan), training and communications, and supporting system elements (such aspurchasing systems, information management systems, etc.). Implementation of each component ortool reflects EPA’s needs with respect to its environmental data operations and Agency policies. At theproject level, planning, implementation, and assessment activities are applied to EPA’s data generation,acquisition, and use. In the planning phases of project management, EPA data users apply a systematicEPA QA/G-16FinalNovember 2002

planning process (such as the data quality objectives process) to specify performance criteria for dataoperations, which are documented in a QA Project Plan. In the implementation phase, technical auditsand assessments are used to ensure that data are being acquired as stated in the EPA QA Project Plan.In the assessment phase, data are formally verified and validated to ensure that they are free of majorerrors and are then analyzed to determine if performance criteria have been met.2.1.1Specifications for EPA OrganizationsEPA Order 5360.1 A2 (EPA, 2000b) defines basic quality management specifications for allEPA organizations covered by the EPA Quality System. These specifications are summarized below.1.Conform to the minimum specifications of ANSI/ASQ E4-1994.2.Identify a QA Manager who reports on quality issues to senior executive leadership andensure that this QA Manager functions independently of direct environmental datageneration, model development, or technology development responsibility.3.Develop a Quality Management Plan and implement this plan following Agencyapproval.4.Provide sufficient resources to implement the quality system.5.Perform assessments of the effectiveness of the quality system at least annually andimplement corrective actions based on assessment results in a timely manner.6.Submit a QA Annual Report and Work Plan for the organization that summarizes theprevious year’s activities and outlines the work proposed for the current year.7.Use a systematic planning approach to develop acceptance or performance criteria forall work covered by the EPA Quality System.8.Have approved QA Project Plans, or equivalent documents, for all applicable EPAprojects and tasks involving environmental data.9.Assess existing data when used to support Agency decisions or other secondarypurposes to verify that they are of sufficient quantity and adequate quality for theirintended use.10.Implement Agency-wide Quality System requirements in all applicable EPA-fundedextramural agreements.EPA QA/G-17FinalNovember 2002

2.1.211.Implement corrective actions based on assessment results.12.Provide appropriate training for all management and staff to assure that QA and QCresponsibilities and requirements are understood at every stage of implementation.Specifications for Non-EPA OrganizationsAgency-wide Quality System specifications may also apply to non-EPA organizations thatcollect or analyze data for or in association with EPA. These specifications are defined in theapplicable regulations governing extramural agreements, as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Agency-wideQuality System specifications may also be invoked as part of negotiated agreements, such as amemorandum of understanding. Non-EPA organizations that may be subject to quality systemspecifications include: any organization or individual under a direct contract to EPA to furnish services oritems or perform work (i.e., a contractor) under the authority of 48 CFR 46, (includingapplicable work assignments, delivery orders, and task orders);Table 1. Quality-Related Regulations and Agreements by -AgencyAgreementEPAN/AN/AN/AN/AEPA Order 5360.1 A2,ANSI/ASQ E4-1994Contractor48 CFR 46N/AN/AN/AN/AFederalAgencyN/AN/AN/ANegotiated intoeach agreementContained in specific FederalRegulation that requires dataHospital48 CFR 4640 CFR 3040 CFR 30N/AContained in specific FederalRegulation that requires dataUniversity48 CFR 4640 CFR 3040 CFR 30N/AContained in specific FederalRegulation that requires dataLocalGovernment48 CFR 4640 CFR 31,40 CFR 3540 CFR 31,40 CFR 35N/AContained in specific FederalRegulation that requires dataNon-profitOrganization48 CFR 4640 CFR 3040 CFR 30N/AContained in specific FederalRegulation that requires dataRegulatedEntityN/AN/AN/AN/AContained in specific FederalRegulation that requires dataStateGovernment48 CFR 4640 CFR 31,40 CFR 3540 CFR 31,40 CFR 35N/AContained in specific FederalRegulation that requires dataTribalGovernment48 CFR 4640 CFR 31,40 CFR 3540 CFR 31,40 CFR 35N/AContained in specific FederalRegulation that requires dataOther Specifications* Grants include Performance Partnerships Grants and Performance Agreements.EPA QA/G-18FinalNovember 2002

institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other nonprofit recipients of financialassistance (e.g., grants and cooperative agreements) under the authority of40 CFR 30; commercial business enterprises; state, local, and tribal governments receiving financial assistance under the authority of40 CFR 31 and 35; and ot

Final EPA QA/G-1 i November 2002 FOREWORD The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an Agency-wide program of quality systems for environmental data.

Related Documents:

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan

service i Norge och Finland drivs inom ramen för ett enskilt företag (NRK. 1 och Yleisradio), fin ns det i Sverige tre: Ett för tv (Sveriges Television , SVT ), ett för radio (Sveriges Radio , SR ) och ett för utbildnings program (Sveriges Utbildningsradio, UR, vilket till följd av sin begränsade storlek inte återfinns bland de 25 största

Hotell För hotell anges de tre klasserna A/B, C och D. Det betyder att den "normala" standarden C är acceptabel men att motiven för en högre standard är starka. Ljudklass C motsvarar de tidigare normkraven för hotell, ljudklass A/B motsvarar kraven för moderna hotell med hög standard och ljudklass D kan användas vid

LÄS NOGGRANT FÖLJANDE VILLKOR FÖR APPLE DEVELOPER PROGRAM LICENCE . Apple Developer Program License Agreement Syfte Du vill använda Apple-mjukvara (enligt definitionen nedan) för att utveckla en eller flera Applikationer (enligt definitionen nedan) för Apple-märkta produkter. . Applikationer som utvecklas för iOS-produkter, Apple .

och krav. Maskinerna skriver ut upp till fyra tum breda etiketter med direkt termoteknik och termotransferteknik och är lämpliga för en lång rad användningsområden på vertikala marknader. TD-seriens professionella etikettskrivare för . skrivbordet. Brothers nya avancerade 4-tums etikettskrivare för skrivbordet är effektiva och enkla att

Den kanadensiska språkvetaren Jim Cummins har visat i sin forskning från år 1979 att det kan ta 1 till 3 år för att lära sig ett vardagsspråk och mellan 5 till 7 år för att behärska ett akademiskt språk.4 Han införde två begrepp för att beskriva elevernas språkliga kompetens: BI

**Godkänd av MAN för upp till 120 000 km och Mercedes Benz, Volvo och Renault för upp till 100 000 km i enlighet med deras specifikationer. Faktiskt oljebyte beror på motortyp, körförhållanden, servicehistorik, OBD och bränslekvalitet. Se alltid tillverkarens instruktionsbok. Art.Nr. 159CAC Art.Nr. 159CAA Art.Nr. 159CAB Art.Nr. 217B1B