Parking Code Changes (Phase I)

2y ago
25 Views
3 Downloads
8.36 MB
87 Pages
Last View : 6d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Melina Bettis
Transcription

Access Management and Parking StrategyParking Code Changes (Phase I)Draft ordinancesCity CouncilNovember 6, 2014

Draft Ordinances for CC Consideration Ordinance No. 8005 amending Land Use CodeSection 9-9-6 Parking Standards to: Simplify and correct parts of the vehicle parkingrequirements, and Add new bike parking requirements by land use Ordinance No. 8006 amending the Design andConstruction Standards (DCS)to Modify multi-bike parking rack design standards

Presentation overview Background (AMPS) Community Input Vehicle Parking Requirements New Bike Parking Standards TAB input / Planning Board discussion andrecommendation Staff recommendation

AMPS Guiding Principles: Provide for All Transportation Modes Customize Tools by Area Support a Diversity of People Seek Solutions with Co-Benefits Plan for the Present and Future Cultivate Partnerships

Public Outreach & Input- AMPS Open House: May 1st- Stakeholder Meeting: June 12th- Planning Board meeting: July 17th- AMPS Open House: October 20th- Additional outreach and communication since PB

Vehicle Parking RequirementsKarl Guiler Community Planning & Sustainability

1Topic 1:Updating RH-1 Parking StandardsCurrent requirement: 1 space for first 500 square feet and 1additional space for each 300 square feet or portion thereof notto exceed 4 spaces per DUProposed requirement: 1 space for detached DU 1 space for a 1 bedroom attached DU 1.5 spaces for 2 bedroom attached DU 2 spaces for 3 bedroom attached DU 3 spaces for 4 or more bedroom attached DU

1Topic 2:Making Driveway Parking Standards forRL-2 Consistent with other DistrictsSuggested changes Parking Standards: (A) No parking areas shall be located in anyrequired landscaped setback abutting a street. However, in RR, RE,or RL-1 zoning districts Variance Standards: (1) The dwelling unit was built in an RR-1, RR-2,RE, or RL-1 zoning district;

1Topic 3:Specifying Non-Residential ParkingRequirements in the RH-6 ZoningDistrict

1Topic 4:Updating Accessible ParkingRequirementsAccessible space requirement0 spaces for the first 7 DUs, 1 space per7 DUs thereafter. Must meet theAmericans with Disabilities Act, asamended.

1Topic 5:Reducing the Parking Rate for LowParking Demand Nonresidential LandUsesProposed change:Airports and aircraft hangersAirport and aircraft 1 parking space for every 4 outside airplane or glider tie down spaces;hangers1 parking space for every 4,000 square feet of floor area of privateairplane hangar space (with or without external or internal walls);1 parking space for every 2,000 square feet of floor area ofcommercial or “executive” airplane hangar space, and,parking for associated office space or areas not used for aircrafthangers shall be required per Table 9-3

1Topic 5:Reducing the Parking Rate for LowParking Demand Nonresidential LandUsesProposed change:WarehousesWarehouse ordistribution facility oruses in industrialzones with accessorywarehouse spaces1 space per 1,000 square feet of floor area used for warehousingand/or storage of goods, merchandise or equipment. Parking forassociated office space or production areas not used forwarehousing or storage outlined above shall be required per Table 93

1Topic 5:Reducing the Parking Rate for LowParking Demand Nonresidential LandUsesWarehouses:WarehouseSquarefootage3600 Pearl3635 33825 Walnut edParking parking perprovided current codeProposed Observed peakparkingparkingrequirement

1Topic 5:Reducing the Parking Rate for LowParking Demand Nonresidential LandUsesProposed change:Self-storageSelf-service3 parking spaces for visitor parking, plus parking required per Tablestorage facility 9-3 for office spaces or areas not specially designated for selfstorage. No parking required for square footage of floor areadesignated for self-storage.

1Topic 5:Reducing the Parking Rate for LowParking Demand Nonresidential redparkingApproved reduction/ Proposed parkingspacesrequirement5002 28th36,0009025% reduction & 56%deferral:16446182% reduction: 549184,4405675Arapahoe

1Topic 6:Simplifying Parking Standards forRetail CentersProjected change:Retail centers over 50,000 sfRetail Centers over 50,000 sf of floor 1 space per 250 square feet of floorarea under common ownership orarea for retail and office uses andmanagement that may contain a mix restaurants, brewpubs and tavernsof uses, including but not limited to uses. Other uses within the retailretail, restaurants, brewpubs, taverns center identified in this table shalland/or office, but excluding residential require parking at the specified rateusesfor that use

*Ideal Market and Community Plaza are excluded as they are less than 50,000 square feet. 1Topic 6: Retail CentersRetail CenterBasemarCurrent CurrentParking Parkingrate4931:169Willowsprings2461:224Ideal MarketCommunityPlazaTable MesaShoppingCenterThe MeadowsThe Village781541:1561:2189371:298Twenty 0(suggested)416278208333276184138220NA- No change ( 50,000)*NA- No change ( 50,000)*13589056791086Peak usage pertransportationstudy280(weekday afternoon)174(weekday afternoon)751(weekday 86332291:26442652844213334138341:172720480360576No data599(Friday evening)1778(Saturday evening)636(weekday afternoon)

*Ideal Market and Community Plaza are excluded as they are less than 50,000 square feet. 1Topic 6: Retail CentersShoppingCenterTable MesaShoppingCenterThe VillageTwentyNinth StreetCrossroadCommonsApproved parking Proposed parking(appl. Reduction %)CurrentParkingprovided937Requiredparking1003937 (6%)1086 (1021)898958857 (10%)863 (777)322934563110 (10%)3413 (3072)834575575 (n/a)576

*Ideal Market and Community Plaza are excluded as they are less than 50,000 square feet. 1Topic 6: Retail Centers 30% restaurants/brewpubs/taverns: 1:250 sf 30-60% restaurants/brewpubs/taverns: 1:175 sf 60% restaurants/brewpubs/taverns: 1:100 sf

TABLE9-4: SUPPLEMENTAL USE SPECIFIC PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES IN ALL ZONES *Ideal 1 Market and Community Plaza are excluded as they are less than 50,000 square feet.Topic 7: Simplifying ParkingRequirements for Restaurants,Brewpubs and Taverns

TABLE9-4: SUPPLEMENTAL USE SPECIFIC PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES IN ALL ZONES *Ideal 1 Market and Community Plaza are excluded as they are less than 50,000 square feet.Topic wpubs andTaverns

TABLE9-4: SUPPLEMENTAL USE SPECIFIC PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES IN ALL ZONES *Ideal 1 Market and Community Plaza are excluded as they are less than 50,000 square feet.Topic 8: Address ‘duplexes’ in parkingstandards orduplex

Bike Parking Standards for newdevelopmentMarni Ratzel GO boulder/Transportation

Bike Mode Target for 2025

Short-Term bike parking Offers a convenient andaccessible area to parkbicycles for customers andother visitors. Short term bicycle parkingshall be located: On the public access level; Within fifty feet of the mainbuilding entrances; and Outside the building.

Long-term bike parking Offers secure and weatherprotected place to store bike forseveral hours Required to be covered and shallinclude use of one of the following: A locked room; An area enclosed by a fence with alocked gate;City of Boulder An area within view of an attendantor security guard or monitored by asecurity camera; or An area visible from employee workareas.The Peloton

Current standardsBoulder JunctionLand Use CategoryLong-term / secure andcoveredShort-term / visitorRH-32 spaces per DU1 per 10 DU, minimum 4MU-4, RH72 spaces per DU1 per 10 DU, minimum 4RH-3, RH-7, MU4 inparking districtMin 3 or 1:2,000 sq. ft ifresidential uses is 50% offloor area or 1:2,500 sq. ft.,which ever is greaterMin. 3 or 1:4,000 sq. ft ifresidential uses 50% ofFloor area or 1:5,000 sq. ft.,which ever is greaterRH-3, RH-7, MU4 not inparking districtMin. 3 or 1: 1500 sq. ft. whichever is greaterMin. 3 or 1:2000 sq. ft. whichever is greaterResidentialNon-residential

Current requirementsElsewhere Citywide Minimum of 3 bike parking spaces or 10% up to 50 spaces 5% for any additional bike parking spacesFor example1,000 off-street vehicle parking spaces 75 bike parking spaces, as follows50 on first 500 and25 on second 500 off-street parking spaces. No requirement in A, RR, RE, RL, RM & RMX

Existing Conditions

BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTSTopic 1 Quantity of required bike parkingTopic 2 Bike parking design standards

Topic 1: Quantity of required bike parking Define minimum quantity for:‣ Employee / resident (long-term)‣ Customer / visitor (short-term bike) Calculate based on land use, and:‣ Land use and square footage (commercial)‣ Units/bedrooms (residential)

Examples of Proposed RequirementsLand Use CategoryMin. SpacesRequiredLong-term /secure andcoveredShort-term/ visitor75 %25 %75%25%25%75%75%25%ResidentialDwelling Units without a2 per unitprivate garage*Cooperative housing1 per 3 bedsunitsNon-residentialRestaurants, brewpubs,1 per 750 sq. ft.tavernsOffice, Medical, Financial1 per 1,500 sq. ft.uses

First reading questions What was the level of public outreach toproperty owners? How will sites that would become non-conforming would be affected by the updatedregulations?

Topic 2: Bike parking designstandards Amend multi-bike parking rack design Provide better guidance on long-term bikeparking

Multi-Bike Rack designExisting Cora-styleRail mounted inverted U racks

Long Term Bike ParkingLong TermBike ParkingSolutions

Transportation Advisory Board Input Unanimously supports policy direction andapproach Favors inverted U bike parking rack design Expressed desire for bike parking thataccommodates cargo bikes and trailers

Planning Board discussion andrecommendation Reviewed proposed changes on July 17th and Sept. 18th Suggested changes to retail parking requirements /requested additional information on RH-1 and ADAparking Unanimous recommendation of approval ofordinances with bicycle parking increased by 25%

Staff recommendationMotion to approve:1.2.Ordinance No. 8005 amending Boulder Revised CodeSection 9-9-6 Parking Standards to: Simplify and correct parts of the vehicle parkingrequirements and Add new bike parking requirements by land use.Ordinance No. 8006 amending the Design andConstruction Standards (DCS)to amend multi-bikeparking rack design standard.

AMPS Next Steps Continued public outreach Continued research of best practices/peercommunities Study Session with City Council (February?) Late 2014/Early 2015: Advance Phase II (longterm) parking change drafting

Questions?

Resource Information:

Peer City Review Davis, California (BFC – Platinum)Denver, Colorado (BFC – Gold)Fort Collins, Colorado (BFC – Platinum)Madison, Wisconsin (BFC – Gold)New York, New York (BFC – Silver)Portland, Oregon (BFC – Platinum)Seattle, Washington (BFC – Gold)Tempe, Arizona (BFC – Gold)

Local case study examples: ResidentialResidentialUnits ExistingProposedTotal (long, short) Total (long, short)Red Oak Park (2637 Valmont)7942 (0,42)158 (118,40)Two Nine North (30th St.)24036 (0,36)476 (358,120)Elements (1707 Walnut)Landmark Lofts II (28th St.)950 28th Street13884178 (128,50)208 (170,38)276 (207,69)168 (126,42)Proposed Standards 2 Bike Parking Spaces Per Unit 75% long-term spaces 25% short-term spaces

Local case study examples: OfficeMedicalSquareFeetExistingProposedTotal (long, short) Total (long, short)1739 Broadway20,91034 (24,10)14 (10,3)1101 Arapahoe1777 Broadway3333 Walnut Street1738 Pearl Street13,85123,657158,19942,00012 (0,12)28 (0,28)42 (0,42)19 (0,19)9 (7,2)16 (12,4)105 (79,26)28 (21,7)Proposed Standards 1 per 1,500 square feet 75% long-term spaces 25% short-term spaces

Local case study examples: MedicalMedicalSquareFeetExistingProposedTotal (long, short) Total (long, short)BCH – Foothills418,000104 (0,124)279 (208,70)BCH – BroadwayBoulder Medical Center304,53076,20046 (28,18)20 (0,20)203 (152,50)51 (28,13)Proposed Standards 1 per 1,500 square feet 75% long-term spaces 25% short-term spaces

Local case study examples: LodgingLodging UsesGuestRoomsCurrentProvidedProposed (Long,Short)St. Julien Hotel10258 (34,24)34 (17,17)Hampton Inn10114 (0,14)34 (17,17)Proposed Standards 1 space per 3 guest rooms75% long-term spaces25% short-term spaces

Local case study examples: OfficeCommercial / RetailSquareFeetExistingProposedTotal (long, short) Total (long, short)Walgreens14,8208 (0,8)20 (5,15)Alfalfa’sTrader JoesChristie Sports36,06614,2008,82020 (0,20)14 (0,14)10 (0,10)48 (12,36)19 (5,14)12 (3,9)Proposed Standards 1 per 750 square feet 25% long-term spaces 75% short-term spaces

TDM and DevelopmentReview Integrate ParkingManagement andTDM Conduct BestPractices Review Modify ExistingTransportationOptions Toolkit fornew developments

Parking for Cargo bikes & trailers

Long Term Bike ParkingSolutionsOverviewTypes Lockers Cages / Rooms CustomSpace SavingOptions Vertical Parking Double Decker

Long Term Bike ParkingBike LockersDescription Fully enclosessingle bicycle Accessible only touser and owner bykey lock.

Long Term Bike ParkingBike RoomsDescription Fully enclosedfacilities thatinclude U racks onthe inside. Access isrestricted to theowners of thebicycles storedinside.

Long Term Bike ParkingCustomDescription Custom solutions tofit specific situations Exampleo The LambethBikehanga

Long Term Bike ParkingSpace Saving Vertical Parking Double Decker

Long Term Bike ParkingSpace Saving Proso Very spaceefficient Conso More expensiveo Difficult to use

AMPS Next Steps Summer 2014 Best practices report on AMPS focus areasCommunity outreachTDM Tool Kit/coordination with TMP UpdatePlanning Board review of ordinance Fall 2014 City Council- bike & phase I code changesReturn to BoardsFollow-Up City Council Study Sessions (July & Oct.)

Reference slides

ExistingManagementAreas

Creating Tools: Districts Taxing districts for parking with bonding capacity No parking requirement for commercial uses

Multi-Modal Access: TDMDowntown Employee Alt Mode SharePrimary Mode2011 20082005199919971995ShiftDrove %Walked10%8%8%8%10%10%-1%Bike14%13%6%8%11%11% 3%Bus22%29%34%14%19%15% 7%Multi-modal6%9%6%1%2%n/an/aAt home0%0%0%n/an/an/an/aOther 1% 1%1%2%1%1%- 1%Total100100%100%100%100%100Travel mode used for work commute on the survey day

Multi-Modal Access: TDMSource: 2012 Boulder Valley Employee Survey, Mode Split for Typical Week

Mode of Transportation to Downtownby Visitor Type 2012

Feedback Intradepartmental Staff Kickoff Workshop Boards: Transportation Advisory Board Planning Board Downtown Management Commission Boulder Junction Access District Commission Downtown Boulder boards: BID & DBI

Feedback: Themes Existing system is working:‣ Districts, integration with alt modes, SUMP Technology can play a larger role inaccess and parking Parking policies shape development Higher level of integration needed

Projects Underway:Back-in parking on University Electrical charging stationsVariable message signage atthe garagesDepot Square and BJAD Districts

Projects Underway, con’t. Renewable Energy Assessemnt of Garages Pilot Parklet on the hill Development of citywide guiding principles‣ Joint advisory board meeting‣ Update to City Council in the fall Assessment of existing programs and policiesincluding prioritization matrix Ongoing coordination with plans (TMP, CAP)Inventory of future planning efforts

Where we have been: Developed 7 focus areas Selected a consultant Joint Board meeting August 2013 Development of citywide guiding principles‣ Joint advisory board meeting‣ Update to City Council in the fall Assessment of existing programs and policiesincluding prioritization matrix Ongoing coordination with plans (TMP, CAP)

Future: AMPS SchedulePhase One: 2013 Development of citywide guiding principles‣ Joint advisory board meeting‣ Update to City Council in the fall Assessment of existing programs and policiesincluding prioritization matrix Ongoing coordination with plans (TMP, CAP)Inventory of future planning efforts

Future: AMPS SchedulePhase Two: 2014 and beyond Implementation of changes based on guidingprinciples and prioritization matrix Continue TMP and CAP coordinationDevelopment of tool box of citywide strategiesApplication of AMPS to new planning efforts

CAGID Parking Analysis

CAGID Parking AnalysisExisting Land Use: 3,100,000 sq. ft. of non-residential space235 dwelling units7,300 FTEsProjected additional development at “buildout”: 1,265,00 sq. ft. of non-residential space180 dwelling units

CAGID Parking AnalysisExisting Parking Supply and DemandCAGID: 3,659 spaces74% occupied – typical weekday daytimePrivate: 3392 spaces61% occupied – typical weekday daytimeTotal: 7,051 spaces68% occupied – typical weekday daytime

CAGID Parking AnalysisCalculated Parking Demand Rates: 1.48 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. non-res. floor area 35% of comparable ITE parking demand rates 0.97 spaces per dwelling unit approx. equal to ITE rateBuildout non-residential parking demand increase: 1,871 spaces 221 existing spaces displaced by new development 2,092 additional parking spaces needed at today’s rates

CAGID Parking AnalysisAccommodating Additional Parking DemandMitigating Parking Demand Increases: TDM to increase alternative mode use (parkingspace equivalents – PSEs)60% non-driver todayin the future? Increase CAGID parking space utilization instructures73% nowin the future? Increase Private parking space utilization61% nowin the future?

CAGID Parking AnalysisAccommodating Additional Parking Demand –ContinuedBuild Additional Parking: Private spaces (Daily Camera, Wells Fargo?) CAGID / Private joint venture?New CAGID parking structure (200 spaces atBroadway/Spruce?)

CAGID Parking AnalysisParking Model: project future parking demandin 5 year increments test the effectiveness of variousTDM and demand reductionstrategies

CAGID Parking AnalysisFive alternatives tested using the parking model:

CAGID Parking AnalysisExisting Land Use: 3,100,000 sq. ft. of non-residential space235 dwelling units7,300 FTEsProjected additional development at “buildout”: 1,265,00 sq. ft. of non-residential space180 dwelling units

Back Pocket Slidesavailable for Q & A

Online Bike Parking SurveysSolicited feedback from Residential property managers (10) Residents (35) Employer work sites (18) Employees (82) General community (226)

employeesKey Findings Majority would like tohave access to longterm bicycle parkingresidents

Key Findings employeesEmployees preferfenced bike cage or tobring into their officeresidents Residents preferstorage rooms

Community SurveyTell us about a destination you bike to: Is there short-term bike parking? Is there long-term bike parking? Is the bike parking provided adequate?

Community Survey Key FindingsMost destinations around town Provide short-term bike parking, but quantity maynot be sufficient Do not provide long-term bike parking, but thosethat do are doing it right.I think that there should be more covered bicycle parking.Boulder does a great job providing secure short-term bicycleparking (for the most part) but bikes deteriorate quicklywhen left exposed to rain/snow/sun and it would be nice tohave roofs or awnings to protect bike parking and keep ourbikes in good working order.

TDM Plan for New DevelopmentsCurrent Process Triggers: Estimated Peak Hourvehicle trips Requirements: Negotiated, Threeyears of Eco Passes, evaluations Targets: “significant trip reduction” Enforcement: None beyondfinancial guarantee for Eco Passes Funding: No specific fundingoutside of GO Boulder budgetOptions Triggers: Location, Access totransit, parking reductions Requirements: Eco Passes,parking management, TMOmembership Targets: Specific and measurableobjectives; VTR, or SOV modeshare Enforcement: Fines, Evaluationand improving of non-compliantprograms Funding: TMO Memberships,development fees

Nov 06, 2014 · Minimum of 3 bike parking spaces or 10% up to 50 spaces 5% for any additional bike parking spaces . For example . 1,000 off-street vehicle parking spaces 75 bike parking spaces, as follows . 50 on first

Related Documents:

Texts of Wow Rosh Hashana II 5780 - Congregation Shearith Israel, Atlanta Georgia Wow ׳ג ׳א:׳א תישארב (א) ׃ץרֶָֽאָּהָּ תאֵֵ֥וְּ םִימִַׁ֖שַָּה תאֵֵ֥ םיקִִ֑לֹאֱ ארָָּ֣ Îָּ תישִִׁ֖ארֵ Îְּ(ב) חַורְָּ֣ו ם

Porous Asphalt Parking Lot Durham 99 42 Parking Lot Legret, 1999 59 Parking Lot Pagotto, 2000 80 Parking Lot Rosen, 2007 98 40 Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers Drive Way Jordon Cove 67 34 Parking Lot Goldsboro 71 65 Parking Lot Renton, WA -- Parking Lot King College 81 53 Parking Lot Drake, 2012 88 88 Parking Lot

One UTSA Circle San Antonio, Texas 78249 501 West César E. Chávez Blvd. San Antonio, Texas 78207 COMMUTER C PARKING RESIDENT H PARKING RESIDENT U PARKING DISABLED PARKING RESERVED PARKING EMPLOYEE A PARKING EMPLOYEE B PARKING SHORT TERM HOURLY PARKING GARAGES (Garage Permit, Short-Term, &

Different types of vehicle parking are applied worldwide namely Multi-level Automated Car Parking, Automated Car Parking System, and Rotary Parking System. The present project work is aimed to develop a scale down working model of a car parking system for parking cars within a large parking area. The chain and

1. Stacker type car parking system 2. Puzzle type car parking system 3. Level type car parking system 4. Chess type car parking system 5. Rotary type car parking system 6. Tower type car parking system But lift is used only in tower type car parking system. Objectives:-

people in saving time and will cut down the fuel spent in search of parking spaces. 3.3 Guided parking navigation Figure 5: Phase 2 - Guided parking navigation After a vehicle enters a parking facility, even be-ing aware of vacant parking spaces, searching for the nearest available parking space is not straight forward in a large or multistory .

(a) allow parking by all motorists only in designated parking stations and/or on specially marked parking bays on road and related areas within the area of operations subject to directions marked on the parking bays or on the signs erected adjacent to the parking bays; and (b) provide specially designated parking spaces/areas within the scheme

PARKING AND TRAFFIC TIPS There is no free parking. Parking on campus requires . a permit. or . visitor parking fees, when-ever the University is open, weekdays from 5 a.m. Monday until 10 p.m. Friday. (CRI Deck requires permit or payment 24/7) Parking is tight at the beginning of each semester. Parking can reach near capacity during the first .