Washington State Board Of Education: 2008 Graduate Follow .

2y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
421.21 KB
35 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Nora Drum
Transcription

RESEARCH REPORTBAKER EVALUATION RESEARCH CONSULTINGMARCH 2010Washington State Board of Education:2008 Graduate Follow-up StudyFINAL REPORTDUANE B. BAKER, Ed.D.CANDACE A. GRATAMA, Ed.D.KARI M. PETERSON, Ph.D.ELIZABETH BOATRIGHT, Ph.D.

Duane Baker is the founder and president of Baker Evaluation,Research, and Consulting, Inc (The BERC Group). Dr. Baker has abroad spectrum of public school educational and programexperience, including serving as a high school classroom teacher,high school assistant principal, middle school principal, executivedirector for curriculum and instruction, and assistantsuperintendent. In addition, he has served as an adjunct instructorin the School of Education at Seattle Pacific University since 1996,where his emphasis has been Educational Measurement andEvaluation and Classroom Assessment.Dr. Baker also serves as the Director of Research for theWashington School Research Center at Seattle Pacific University.He also serves as an evaluator for several organizations includingthe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Washington EducationFoundation, Washington State Office of Superintendent of PublicInstruction, and others.Members of The BERC Group have K–20, experiences as teachers,counselors, psychologists, building administrators, districtadministrators, and college professors. The team is currentlyworking on research and evaluation projects at the national, state,regional, district, school, classroom, and student levels in over1000 schools in Washington State and nationally.COPYRIGHT 2010 BY THE BERC GROUP INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS REPORT MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH THE BERC GROUP (www.bercgroup.com).THE BERC GROUP

Table of ContentsEXECUTIVE SUMMARYINTRODUCTION.1College Remediation: The Nature of the Problem . 1Possible Causes and Solutions . 2METHODOLOGY.3Research Questions . 3Sampling Procedure . 3Transcript Sample. 6College Attendance . 7Data Gathering and Analysis .10RESEARCH FINDINGS .11Research Question #1: What is the difference in high school course-taking patterns betweenstudents who enroll in two-year versus four-year colleges (by student ethnicity, gender, twoyear; four-year; total)? .11Research Question #2: What course-taking patterns predict enrollment in a two-year and fouryear college? .14Research Question #3: What are the math and English course-taking patterns for students in theSBCTC system who took remedial, college level, or no math or English in the year after highschool? When did they last take math or English in high school and at what level? .15Research Question #4: What math do students take at the high school and at the communityand technical colleges while in a dual enrollment program (Running Start or College in HighSchool)? .20Research Question #5: What is the relationship between the level of math students take in highschool and the students declared purpose for enrolling in a community and technical college inthe first year (transfer, workforce – program area of study/career cluster, other purpose)?.21Research Question #6: Of the students who take three or more career and technical educationcredits in high school, what is their declared purpose for enrolling in a community and technicalcollege in the first year (transfer, workforce – program area of study/career cluster, S.27THE BERC GROUP

Executive SummaryStudents who are ready for college level work are more successful in college than those who arenot. However, many students enrolling in college nationally and in Washington State are not readyto take college level course work. The Washington State Board of Education commissioned thisresearch to examine the relationship between high school and college course-taking patterns.This study examined the course-taking patterns for students of the graduating class of 2008 acrossWashington State. The sample was drawn from a previous transcript study. Of the originalparticipants (n 14,875), we were able to match 89% of the records (n 13,247). Overall, 6,377students attended a two-year college in Washington State or one of six four-year colleges anduniversities identified for this study.Overall results demonstrate large differences in course-taking patterns depending on the type ofcollege students attend. Students who attended four-year colleges or who were dual enrolled tookmore rigorous courses than students who attended a two-year college. Of the 2008 high schoolgraduates who attended college the year after graduating high school, 45% of students attending atwo-year college, 85% of students attending a four-year college, and 82% of students who weredual enrolled met minimum, public four-year Washington college admissions standards set by theHEC Board. There are significant differences between the two-year and the four-year group andthe two-year and dual enrollment group across each subject area, with the four-year and dualenrollment groups meeting eligibility requirements in each subject area at higher rates than thetwo-year group.A logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict enrollment into a two-year or four-yearcollege. GPA had the highest predictive ability, followed by level of last math class, foreignlanguage requirement met, and the level of the last English class. This indicates that both coursesand grades are important in predicting the type of college enrollment.An analysis of the percent of students taking remedial math and English courses shows that 56.9%of students took a college remedial math or English course in the CTC system. By subject area,49.7% of students took a remedial math course, 25.6% took a remedial English course, and 18.5%took both a remedial math and a remedial English course. A logistic regression analysis wasconducted to better understand the relationship between students enrolling in remedial courses andwhen they last took English and math, and at what level. For math, the last level that studentscompleted was the strongest predictor of whether a student enrolls in a remedial math coursefollowed by GPA. Findings show that students are less likely to enroll in a remedial math course incollege if they have taken Calculus or beyond in high school. For English, GPA was the strongestpredictor, followed by the level of English course students attained in high school. In both cases,the last year students took the course was not a statistically significant predictor. This indicates thatthe level students attain in math and English is more important than when they last take math orEnglish.Approximately 34% of students who participate in Running Start or College in High School takemath during that dual enrollment program; 38% do not take math while in the dual enrollmentprogram; and 27% take math through their high school. Analyzing the type of math students take isdifficult because many schools do not specifically code the Running Start course on the transcripts.i THE BERC GROUP

There are differences in course-taking patterns based on students declared purpose for enrolling ina community and technical college. Students who plan to transfer to a four-year college aftercompleting their work at a two-year college typically have attained higher levels of math thanstudents who have a workforce goal. Students with a transfer goal are also enrolled in remedialmath courses at higher rates. This is expected because transfer students generally have to take moremath. Interestingly, there is a trend that as students take more career and technical credits in highschool, there is an increasing percentage of students entering the CTC system with a workforcegoal. This may mean that students are choosing certain course-taking patterns in high school basedon their expectations at the CTC.The results of this study suggest that there are some important relationships between high schooland college course-taking patterns. The current study and existing research provide criticalguideposts for improving college and career preparation for Washington students. The courses students take in high school are important predictors in the direction studentsgo in college and in their ultimate success. Effective guidance and planning is necessary sostudents fully understand the courses they need to take in high school for their postsecondary plans.The level students attain in English and math is an important predictor in whether studentstake remedial English and math courses. Adequately preparing and requiring students toreach specific course levels is necessary to ensure students are prepared to engage incollege level work and to reduce remediation rates in college.Algebra II is the pre-requisite for admission into a four-year college. However, manystudents who achieve this level of math end up enrolling in a pre-college or remedial mathcourses. This suggests that there is a misalignment between high school math preparationand college level preparation. Additional studies should be conducted to determine if this isa misalignment between the high school curriculum and college curriculum or if there is anissue with the placement test. This may be a focus of policy investigation in the future.Students enrolling with a workforce goal tend to take a greater proportion of career andtechnical education credits. Education pertaining to the evolving requirements for enteringthe workforce is important.THE BERC GROUPii

Washington State Board of Education:2008 Graduate Follow-Up StudyFINAL REPORTINTRODUCTIONThis report summarizes findings from a follow-up study of the Washington State Board ofEducation Transcript Study (Baker, Gratama, Peterson, & Bachtler, 2008). The purpose of thisstudy is to provide the State Board of Education (SBE) information about student course-takingpatterns in college by analyzing 2008 high school graduates’ course-taking patterns in relation totheir enrollment in two-year and four-year colleges the following year. This study also aims toprovide information around math and English course-taking patterns in college. The report beginsby summarizing the research on course-taking patterns and achievement to place the currentfindings in the context of previous research. The introductory section is followed by a descriptionof the research design, research findings, and discussion and conclusions.College Remediation: The Nature of the ProblemAccording to 2003-2004 ACT Assessment results, only 40% of high school graduates were readyfor their first course of college Algebra, and only 68% are ready for college coursework in English(ACT, 2004). Put simply, high school students who are prepared for college-level work are moresuccessful in college than those who are not. Students are aware of this too. Survey data fromWashington State schools show many students aspire to attend college but do not believe their highschool has prepared them adequately in terms of coursework (Baker, Gratama, Peterson, &Bianchi, 2007). In fact, current college readiness standards (as defined by ACT and WashingtonState agencies such as the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction and the State Board ofCommunity and Technical Colleges) are above the statewide minimum math requirements for highschool graduation in Washington State (Washington State Board for Community and TechnicalColleges, 2009). Statewide, approximately 48% of graduates attending a Community and TechnicalCollege (CTC) in the year after they graduate enroll in a remedial math class and 28% enroll in aremedial English class (Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, 2009).Therefore, a student can graduate from high school successfully in Washington State and still not beready for college, causing significant financial, opportunity, and institutional costs down the road(State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, Office of Superintendent of PublicInstruction, and the Higher Education Coordinating Board, 2004; Washington State Board forCommunity and Technical Colleges, 2009).On a national level, the ACT estimated in 2005 that approximately 1 billion of institutional fundsgo toward college remediation, whether it is pre-college course offerings, counseling, or othersupport programs (Conley, 2007). Similar to Washington State, federal statistics indicate that 40%of admitted and enrolled students take at least one remedial course (National Center for EducationStatistics, 2004), reducing dramatically their probability of graduating from college. More than anyother subject, college remediation occurs most frequently for math. English speaking ability,1THEBERCGROUP

socioeconomic status, and race are also statistically significant predictors of college readiness inWashington State and on a national level (Stern & Pavelchek, 2006; Conley, 2007). Remediationrates and college readiness statistics, however, only reveal the tip of the iceberg. Many colleges anduniversities permit students to enroll in college-level courses even if they are identified as needingremedial coursework. Placement methods also vary greatly across institutions and are oftenrudimentary in nature, identifying only those students with the most severe learning needs(Conley, 2007).Possible Causes and SolutionsAccording to the State Board of Community and Technical Colleges, the Office of Superintendentof Public Instruction, and the Higher Education Coordinating Board in Washington State, the majorcauses of college remediation are (a) insufficient or untimely information about preparationrequirements, (b) inadequate student preparation and guidance, (c) the wide variety andinconsistency of placement tests, (d) misalignment between college ready curriculum and highschool graduation requirements, and (e) the need for better content-based professionaldevelopment for teachers, particularly in math (State Board for Community and TechnicalColleges, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the Higher Education CoordinatingBoard, 2004).An oft-cited solution to the readiness problem is to increase high school graduation standards,provide supplemental supports for struggling students such as those offered in the Transition MathProject and Achieve the Dream programs, and eliminate low-level courses (Bottoms & Feagin,2003; Baker, Clay, & Gratama, 2005; ACT, 2004; Stern & Pavelchek, 2006; Tierney, Bailey,Constantine, Finkelstein, & Hurd, 2009). Past research reveals that students in states with highermath graduation requirements tend to enroll in higher-level math courses as college freshmen andpersist in these courses (Schiller & Muller, 2003). Regardless of state, ethnicity, or socioeconomicstatus, students who take advanced math and English courses (especially, AP English) are morelikely to attend college and earn college degrees (Stern & Pavelchek, 2006; Adelman, 2006).Furthermore, some researchers have claimed that taking an advanced math course in high school isthe best predictor for obtaining a college degree (Adelman, 2006; Stern & Pavelchek, 2006;Shettle, et al., 2007). And yet, multilevel regression analysis of 1992 NELS data revealed that highschool students’ math and science test scores did not vary by high school graduation requirementpolicy, suggesting that increasing the number of required math and science credits by itself may notbe sufficient to improve understanding in these subjects (Teitelbaum, 2003). Possible reasons forthis disconfirming evidence, the author admits, could be due to curriculum dilution or insufficientadvancement in coursework.Some specific efforts underway to reduce remediation in Washington State include the TransitionMath Project, a statewide initiative jointly funded by the Legislature and the Bill and Melinda GatesFoundation, and proposed revisions to the state’s minimum basic admission standards for collegefreshmen. Ultimately, school leaders need to ensure that families, students, and teachersunderstand what constitutes a college-ready curriculum and develop a four-year course trajectorywith students early in their high school careers (Tierney, Bailey, Constantine, Finkelstein, & Hurd,2009).THEBERCGROUP2

METHODOLOGYThe purpose of this study was to further analyze 2008 graduates’ high school transcripts to provideinformation about high school course-taking patterns in relation to Washington State two-year andfour-year college course-taking patterns.Research QuestionsThis project is guided by a series of research questions. These questions call for sophisticated codingof transcripts and for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis, using data from the 2008 StateBoard of Education Transcript Study, the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), and the StateBoard for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC). The research questions are listed below.1. What is the difference in high school course-taking patterns between students who enroll intwo-year versus four-year colleges (by student ethnicity, gender, two-year, four-year, total)?2. What course-taking patterns predict enrollment in a two-year and four-year college?3. What are the math and English course-taking patterns for students in the SBCTC system whotook remedial, college level, or no math or English in the year after high school? When did theylast take math or English and at what level?4. What math do students take at the high school and at the community and technical collegeswhile in a dual enrollment program (Running Start or College in High School)?5. What is the relationship between students level of math students take in high school and thestudents’ declared purpose for enrolling in a community and technical college in the first year(transfer, workforce – program area of study/career cluster, other purposes)?6. Of the students who take three or more career and technical education credits in high school,what is their declared purpose for enrolling in a community and technical college in the firstyear (transfer, workforce – program area of study/career cluster, other purpose)?Sampling ProcedureFor the present study, we recoded transcripts collected from the Washington State Board ofEducation Transcript Study (Baker, Gratama, Peterson, & Bachtler, 2008). Please refer to thatstudy for a full description of the sampling method.From the original transcripts, we used the State Student Identification (SSID) number to match highschool transcripts to college records. In some cases, the SSID had been removed from the highschool transcripts, and it was not possible to match records. From the original study of 100 schools(n 14,874 transcripts), we were able to match transcripts from 90 schools (n 13,247transcripts), representing 89% of the transcripts. The original study included representation fromevery county in Washington State; the exclusion of 10 schools eliminated six counties from thissample. Table 1 details the participating districts and schools included in this study by county. Table2 details district and schools that were excluded from the study.3THEBERCGROUP

Table 1.Selected Districts and SchoolsCountyDistrictAdamsOthello School DistrictBentonKennewick School DistrictBentonRichland School DistrictChelanCashmere School DistrictClallamQuillayute Valley School DistrictClarkVancouver School DistrictClarkWashougal School DistrictClarkHockinson School DistrictClarkLa Center School DistrictClarkEvergreen School District (Clark)ClarkRidgefield School DistrictCowlitzCastle Rock School DistrictCowlitzKalama School DistrictFerryCurlew School DistrictFranklinPasco School DistrictGarfieldPomeroy School DistrictGrantRoyal School DistrictGrantWarden School DistrictGrays Harbor Wishkah Valley School DistrictIslandSouth Whidbey School DistrictJeffersonQuilcene School DistrictKingAuburn School DistrictKingNorthshore School DistrictKingEnumclaw School DistrictKingTukwila School DistrictKingHighline School DistrictKingFederal Way School DistrictKingBellevue School DistrictKingIssaquah School DistrictKingLake Washington School DistrictKingMercer Island School DistrictKingSnoqualmie Valley School DistrictKingSeattle Public SchoolsKingRenton School DistrictKingSkykomish School DistrictKingTahoma School DistrictKingVashon Island School DistrictKitsapBainbridge Island School DistrictKitsapCentral Kitsap School DistrictKitsapBremerton School DistrictKittitasThorp School DistrictKlickitatKlickitat School DistrictTHEBERCSchoolOthello High SchoolKamiakin High SchoolRivers Edge High SchoolCashmere High SchoolForks High SchoolColumbia River HighExcelsior High SchoolHockinson High SchoolLa Center High SchoolLegacy High SchoolRidgefield High SchoolCastle Rock High SchoolKalama Jr Sr HighCurlew Elem & High SchoolPasco Senior High SchoolPomeroy Jr Sr High SchoolRoyal High SchoolWarden High SchoolWishkah Valley Elementary/High SchoolBayview Alternative SchoolQuilcene High And ElementaryAuburn Mountainview High SchoolBothell High SchoolEnumclaw Sr High SchoolFoster Senior High SchoolGlobal Connections High SchoolH. S. Truman High SchoolInternational SchoolIssaquah High SchoolLake Washington HighMercer Island High SchoolMount Si High SchoolRainier Beach High SchoolRenton Senior High SchoolSkykomish High SchoolTahoma Senior High SchoolVashon Island High SchoolBainbridge High SchoolCentral Kitsap High SchoolRenaissance Alternative High SchoolThorp Elem & Jr Sr HighKlickitat Elem & HighGROUP4

LewisLincolnMasonOkanoganPend iercePiercePiercePiercePierceSan rstonThurstonThurstonThurstonWahkiakumWalla WallaWhatcomWhatcomYakimaMossyrock School DistrictDavenport School DistrictNorth Mason School DistrictBrewster School DistrictNewport School DistrictBethel School DistrictSumner School DistrictUniversity Place School DistrictEatonville School DistrictFife School DistrictPeninsula School DistrictClover Park School DistrictTacoma School DistrictOrting School DistrictFranklin Pierce School DistrictWhite River School DistrictPuyallup School DistrictOrcas Island School DistrictAnacortes School DistrictSedro-Woolley School DistrictStevenson-Carson School DistrictSnohomish School DistrictEverett School DistrictGranite Falls School DistrictLake Stevens School DistrictMukilteo School DistrictMarysville School DistrictEdmonds School DistrictSultan School DistrictArlington School DistrictEast Valley School District (Spokane)Freeman School DistrictMead School DistrictSpokane School DistrictCentral Valley School DistrictColville School DistrictOlympia School DistrictRainier School DistrictNorth Thurston Public SchoolsYelm School DistrictWahkiakum School DistrictWaitsburg School DistrictLynden School DistrictNooksack School DistrictHighland School District5THEBERCMossyrock Middle & High SchlDavenport Senior High SchoolNorth Mason Senior High SchoolBrewster High SchoolNewport High SchoolBethel High SchoolBonney Lake High SchoolCurtis Senior HighEatonville High SchoolFife High SchoolHenderson Bay Alt High SchoolLakes High SchoolMt TahomaOrting High SchoolWashington High SchoolWhite River High SchoolEB Walker High SchoolOrcas Island High SchoolAnacortes High SchoolSedro Woolley Senior High SchoolStevenson High SchoolAim High SchoolEverett High SchoolGranite Falls High SchoolLake Stevens High SchoolMariner High SchoolMarysville Mountain View High SchoolMountlake Terrace High SchoolSultan Senior High SchoolWeston High SchoolEast Valley High School & ExtensionFreeman High SchoolMead Alternative High SchoolNorth Central High SchoolUniversity High SchoolColville Senior High SchoolAvanti High SchoolRainier Senior High SchoolRiver Ridge High SchoolYelm High School 12Wahkiakum High SchoolWaitsburg High SchoolLynden High SchoolNooksack Valley High SchoolHighland High SchoolGROUP

YakimaYakimaYakimaYakimaYakima School DistrictSunnyside School DistrictToppenish School DistrictWapato School DistrictStanton Alternative SchoolSunnyside High SchoolToppenish High SchoolWapato High SchoolTable 2.Districts and Schools Excluded from the StudyCountyDistrictAsotinClarkston School DistrictColumbiaDayton School DistrictCowlitzWoodland School DistrictDouglasEastmont School DistrictKingRiverview School DistrictPacificWillapa Valley School DistrictSan JuanOrcas Island School DistrictSpokaneDeer Park School DistrictWhatcomMount Baker School DistrictWhitmanColfax School DistrictSchoolCharles Francis Adams High SchoolDayton High SchoolWoodland High SchoolEastmont Senior HighCedarcrest High SchoolWillapa Valley Jr Sr HighOrcas Island High SchoolDeer Park High SchoolMount Baker Senior HighColfax High SchoolWe averaged the demographics of the sample to compare them with the demographics of alleligible high schools in the state and from the original study (see Table 3). The sample was deemedto be representative of the state demographics, with a slightly higher percentage of white studentsrepresented in the sample and a higher mean enrollment compared to the state.1Table 3.Demographics of Schools in SampleEntire Population*(n 504)EnrollmentFree/ReducedLunchAmer Ind/AlaNativeAsianBlackHispanicWhiteMean 637(Range 5 – 3142)35%Student Sample fromOriginal Study(n 100)Mean 787(Range 26 – 3142)34%Student Sample forCurrent Study(n 90)Mean 809(Range 26 – 3142)35%3%3%3%8%6%14%68%5%4%13%75%5%5%13%74%*Note. Entire Population all eligible high schools in the state.Transcript Sample1Information was obtained from the OSPI website: www.k12.wa.us.THEBERCGROUP6

A team of researchers and school counselors recoded 13,247 graduating students’ transcripts byhand from the 90 schools (Range 3 to 454 per school) to answer the additional questions posedby the SBE. This is 21.3% of the total 2008 Washington State high school graduating population(n 62,041).Of the 13,247 students in the sample 46.9% were male, 51.4% were female, and 1.7% did notreport gender. The ethnic distribution aligns more closely to the state demographics. Table 4details the demographics of the students compared to the state.Table 4.Demographics of Students in SampleEntire Population(n 1,031,846)Amer Ind/Ala %Other-Not Reported--Sample by School(n 13,247)1.2%6.6%3.6%11.0%65.5%0.6%11.5%College AttendanceFinally, because the purpose of this study was to link high school transcripts to college transcripts,we identified students who attended college the year after graduating from high school. Collegeenrollment and persistence data were obtained from the National Student Clearinghouse for allschools identified in the State Board of Education Transcript Study. We submitted informationcollected from the transcripts, including lists of the names, birth dates, year of graduation, and highschool attended, among other data, to NSC to be matched with the college reported enrollmentsfrom 2008 across the nation. The research team then compiled and analyzed the yearly enrollmentrecords to determine college enrollment rates for all study participants and compared these rates toWashington State rates.“College direct” students are defined as high school graduates who attended either a two- or fouryear college any time in the academic year immediately following their high school graduation. Thecollege direct rates for SBE study participants and Washington State are presented in Figure 1. Theresults show a similar percentage of students identified for this study attended college as comparedto Washington State.7THEBERCGROUP

College Direct: SBE Study GraduatesSBE GraduatesWA State gh School Graduation YearFigure 1. Percent “College Direct” 2008Figure 2 shows the percentage of college direct students attending two- and four-year colleges thefirst year after graduating high school. These data indicate a similar percentage of students attend atwo-year college within the sample and compared to Washington State.THEBERCGROUP8

2- vs 4-Year College: SBE Study Graduates% college direct students attending a 2-year college first year% college direct students attending a 4-year college first 0082008

Education Transcript Study (Baker, Gratama, Peterson,& Bachtler, 2008). The purpose of this study is to provide the State Board of Education (SBE) information about student course-taking patterns in college by analyzing 2008 hig

Related Documents:

for Nursing (69) Delaware Board of Nursing (12) District of Columbia Board of Nursing (75) Florida Board of Nursing (70) Georgia Board of Nursing (31) Guam Board of Nurse Examiners (87) Hawaii Board of Nursing (37) Idaho Board of Nursing (82) Illinois Board of Nursing (49) Indiana State Board of Nursing (48) Iowa Board of Nursing (60)

5. George Washington is honored on Valentine's Day. YES NO 6. Washington State is on the East Coast of the U.S. YES NO 7. George Washington's birthday is in January. YES NO 8. George Washington's face is on the 5 bill. YES NO 9. George Washington was a general in the Vietnam War. YES NO 10. George Washington was an important movie star .

The Board of Education's Career and Technical Education Seal The Board of Education's Seal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math The Board of Education's Seal for Excellence in Civics Education The Board of Education's Seal of Biliteracy The Board of Education's Seal for

STATE OF WASHINGTON 712712018 2:42 PM BY SUSAN L. CARLSON CLERK NO. 95974-9 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ACCESS THE USA., LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; 520 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FUND II, LP, a Washington Limited Partnership; and PREMIER 520 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FUND II, LP, a Washington Limited Partnership, Appellants, V.

Washington State Office of Financial Management Washington State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Washington State Patrol . This is the first NWHIDTA Marijuana Impact Report providing data for the State of Washington. This report has been organized in order to lay out the foundation of legalization

Washington State Farmers Market Manual The Washington State Farmers Market Manual is a publication of the Washington State Department of Agriculture Small Farm and Direct Marketing Program, the Washington State University Sma

USC at Ohio State LAST WEEK’S RESULTS Boise State 19, Oregon 8 LSU at Washington Stanford 39, Washington State 13 Arizona 19, Central Michigan 6 Arizona State 50, Idaho State 3 California 52, Maryland 13 Oregon State 34, Portland State 7 UCLA 33, San Diego State 14 USC 56, San Jose State 3 WASHINGTON vs. IdAHO

Colbert County Colbert County Board of Education 6 Elected 7 Cullman County Cullman County Board of Education 7 Elected 6 Cullman Cullman City Schools Board of Education 5 Elected 6 Decatur Decatur City Board of Education 5 Elect