Neural Tube Defects Review - University Of Utah

2y ago
14 Views
2 Downloads
851.93 KB
21 Pages
Last View : 18d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Braxton Mach
Transcription

Neurogenetics (2006) 7: 201–221DOI 10.1007/s10048-006-0052-2REVIEW ARTICLEPatrizia De Marco . Elisa Merello .Samantha Mascelli . Valeria CapraCurrent perspectives on the genetic causes of neural tubedefectsReceived: 11 April 2006 / Accepted: 29 May 2006 / Published online: 29 August 2006# Springer-Verlag 2006Abstract Neural tube defects (NTDs) are a group of severecongenital abnormalities resulting from the failure ofneurulation. The pattern of inheritance of these complexdefects is multifactorial, making it difficult to identify theunderlying causes. Scientific research has rapidly progressedin experimental embryology and molecular genetics toelucidate the basis of neurulation. Crucial mechanisms ofneurulation include the planar cell polarity pathway, which isessential for the initiation of neural tube closure, and thesonic hedgehog signaling pathway, which regulates neuralplate bending. Genes influencing neurulation have beeninvestigated for their contribution to human neural tubedefects, but only genes with well-established role inconvergent extension provide an exciting new set ofcandidate genes. Biochemical factors such as folic acidappear to be the greatest modifiers of NTDs risk in thehuman population. Consequently, much research hasfocused on genes of folate-related metabolic pathways.Variants of several such genes have been found to besignificantly associated with the risk of neural tube defects inmore studies. In this manuscript, we reviewed the currentperspectives on the causes of neural tube defects andhighlighted that we are still a long way from understandingthe etiology of these complex defects.Keywords Neural tube defects (NTDs) . Neurulation .Genetic risk factors . Planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway .Folate metabolismAbbreviations NTDs: Neural tube defects .AED: Antiepileptic drug . CRs: Cysteine-rich domains .BMP: Bone morphogenetic protein . FGF: Fibroblastgrowth factor . FGFR: Fibroblast growth factor receptor .P. De Marco . E. Merello . S. Mascelli . V. Capra (*)U.O. Neurochirurgia, Istituto G. Gaslini,Largo G. Gaslini 5,16148 Genova, Italye-mail: valeriacapra@ospedale-gaslini.ge.itTel.: 39-010-5636712Fax: 39-010-3993159IGF: Insulin-like growth factor . DV: Dorsoventral .AP: Anteroposterior . RA: Retinoic acid .Shh: Sonic hedgehog . b-HLH: Basic helix-loop-helix .RARs: Retinoic acid receptors . PCP: Planar cell polarity .MHP: Median hinge point . DLHPs: Dorsolateral hingepoints . GCPS: Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome .HPE: Holoprosencephaly . BM: Body mass .Hcy: Homocysteine . THF: Tetrahydrofolate .LDL: Low-density lipoprotein . PKC: Protein kinase CIntroductionNeural tube defects (NTDs) are a group of birth anomaliesresulting from failure of fusion of the neural tube aroundthe 28th day after conception, at a time when most womendo not know they are pregnant. NTDs are known to occurin 1 out every 1,000 pregnancies in the United States, withvarying rates reported among the world’s populations [1].The most common NTDs is anencephaly, which resultsfrom failure of fusion of the cranial neural tube, andmyelomeningocele (commonly called spina bifida), whichresults from the failure of fusion in the spinal region of theneural tube. Failure of closure that involves the entire bodyaxis is known as craniorachischisis, which is an additional,relatively rare, form of dysraphism. Anencephaly andmyelomeningocele are referred as “open” NTDs becausethe affected region is exposed to the body surface. Thereare also a number of closed or skin-covered conditions thatinvolve the neural tube, including: encephalocele, meningocele, lipomeningocele, also referred to as spina bifidaocculta, and sacral agenesis. All infants with anencephalyare stillborn or die shortly after birth, whereas many infantswith spina bifida survive, usually as a result of extensivemedical and surgical care. However, affected individualsare at risk for a range of physical and developmentaldisabilities (abnormal innervation beneath the level oflesion, varying degrees of muscle weakness, and sensoryimpairment, neurogenic bladder, and bowel). The majorityof NTDs (approximately 70%) occur in isolation and showmultifactorial inheritance.

202Several lines of evidence suggest a genetic component ofNTDs: firstly, NTDs are associated with known geneticsyndromes, trisomies 13 and 18, and various chromosomerearrangements [2]; secondly, the estimated recurrence riskin siblings is 2–5%, representing up a 50-fold increasedrisk over that observed in general population [3]; andfinally, the presence of family history in a number ofaffected ones [4]. There is a recent epidemiologicalevidence suggesting that genetic factors related to NTDsmay be transmitted preferentially from the mother’s side ofthe family [5]. Despite extensive efforts, no one singlemajor gene has been implicated as a direct causal agent ofthese human defects, a common result in genetic studies ofcomplex diseases.Overview of human nervous system developmentIn human embryos, neurulation occurs in two phases:primary and secondary neurulation. Primary neurulationconcerns the transformation of the flat ectodermal neuralplate into the cylindrical neural tube. Secondary neurulation is limited to the tail bud and occurs by proliferationand condensation of stem cells that subsequently cavitates.The cavitation results in the formation of a tube makingcontact with the central canal of the portion of the neuraltube formed during primary neurulation. The two processeshave been reviewed elsewhere [6–8].The closure of neural tube in the human embryo hasbeen initially described as a continuous process that beginsat the level of the future cervical region and proceeds bothrostrally and caudally [9]. However, multiple initiationsites of neural tube closure have been demonstrated in miceand other species. In the mouse, neural tube closure beginsat the boundary between the hindbrain and the cervicalregion (closure 1), with closure spreading from this siterostrally into the hindbrain, as well as caudally into thespinal region. A second point of de novo initiation of neuraltube closure is in the vicinity of the forebrain–midbrainboundary (closure 2), and a third initiation site is at therostral extremity of the neural plate (closure 3) [10].Although the location of closures 1 and 3 appears to beuniform between mouse strains, the site of closure 2 ispolymorphic and in some mouse strains (e.g., SELH/Bc)does not occur at all [11]. When closure site 1 fails, theentire neural tube from the midbrain to the lower spineremains open, which is a condition known as craniorachischisis. Embryos in which closure 2 is disrupted haveexencephaly. The failure of closure 3 leads to anencephalythat is confined to the forebrain region, often in associationwith split-face malformation. When the caudal spread offusion from closure 1 fails to be completed, the posteriorneuropore remains open which results in open spina bifidaor myelomeningocele. Based on a study of the type andfrequency of human NTDs, Van Allen et al. [12] proposeda model in which five closure sites exist in human embryos.According to their model, closure 1 occurs in the cervicalregion and extends bidirectionally. Closure 2 takes place atthe junction between prosencephalon and mesencephalonand also extends bidirectionally. Closure 3 initiates at therostral tip of the neural groove and proceeds caudally tomeet closure 2. Closure 4 covers the rhombencephalon andcompletes the closure of cranial neural tube. Closure 5initiates from the caudal end of the neural groove andspreads cranially (Fig. 1). Although this model wasattractive to explain human defects, examination ofhistological sections of human embryos leads to differentmodels of neural tube closure. In fact, a study by Nakatsu etal. [13] described three sites of apposition, while O’Rahillyand Muller [14] found only two regions of fusion inhumans, the first one extending bidirectionally from therhombencephalic region and the second one that proceeding caudally from the prosencephalic region. The humanclosure events found by O’Rahilly and Muller have strikingresemblance to mouse closures 1 and 3. Therefore,multisite neural tube closure may be a universal phenomenon, although the process appears to be not the same in thehuman and the other species. This implies, as remarked byNakatsu et al. [13], that “care should be taken whenextrapolating embryological data from laboratory animalsto the human”.Molecular genetics of neurulationOur ability to understand the pathological mechanismsleading to NTDs depends on the extent to which weunderstand the normal processes that take place duringneurulation. Unfortunately, our current knowledge of theseprocesses is limited, although this situation is changingrapidly because of the growing interest of biologists inneural development at a number of different levels: cellularstudies of neurulation, studies of mutant mouse, and studiesof the interactions responsible for inducing and patterningof neural plate and tube. This review dissects neurulationinto distinct processes that, in turn, are further dissected atthe molecular level. Moreover, we present the results ofgenetic analysis of human homologues of genes causingNTDs in animal models.The earliest step in the formation of the nervous systemis neural induction, the process by which ectodermal cellsadopt a neural identity. Concomitantly with neural induction, the induced neural plate becomes patterned along thecraniocaudal, dorsoventral, and mediolateral axes. Whileregional patterning is occurring, the neural plate undergoesmorphogenesis: neural folds arise, approach one another inthe dorsal midline, and fuse.Neurulation is driven by redundant mechanisms both atthe tissue and cellular level, as well as the molecular levelof organization [7]. Nevertheless, even with both intrinsicand extrinsic forces acting redundantly, disruption ofneurulation does occur, resulting in NTDs [7].Neural inductionThe amphibian embryo provides an excellent system forstudying how the central nervous system is formed in a

203Fig. 1 Multisite closure of the neural tube in the human embryobased on the model proposed by van Allen et al. [12]. According tothis model, five closures (four in the head and one in the lumbarregion) exist in the neural tube of human embryos. The arrowsindicate the direction of closure. The various types of human NTDscan be explained by failure of fusion of one of the site closures.Anencephaly results from the failure of closure 2; sacral myelomeningocele results from failure of closure 5; occipital cephaloceleresults from incomplete membrane fusion of closure 4vertebrate embryo. Back in 1924, Spemann and Mangold[15] showed that grafts of the dorsal lip region (“organizer”)of Xenopus embryos were able to induce twinning of neuraltissue when transplated into an ectopic site. Extensivescreens for organizer-specific genes have been performedand lead to the identification of genes that encode secretedproteins expressed specifically in Spemann’s organizer [16].Chordin is one of the most abundant proteins secreted byorganizer tissue at the gastrula stage, reaching concentrations of 6–10 nM in the extracellular space. Whenmicroinjected into Xenopus embryos, chordin mRNA isable to induce twinning and neural induction, recapitulatingSpemann’s experiments [17, 18]. Chordin is a secretedprotein with four cysteine-rich domains (CRs) of about 70amino acids each. Each CR domain constitutes a bonemorphogenetic protein (BMP)-binding module [19]. Thechordin loss-of-function phenotype can be rescued byknockdown of BMPs, underscoring that chordin is adedicated BMP antagonist [20]. BMPs normally preventembryonic ectoderm from executing its natural “default”tendency to differentiate into neural tissue and insteadinstruct cells to form epidermis [21, 22]. Lack of BMPsignaling in turn leads to the dorsalization of mesoderm andto the neuralization of ectoderm [23] (Fig. 2). Other BMPinhibitors include follistatin, noggin, cerberus, Xnr3 (Xenopus nodal-related 3), and TSG (twisted gastrulation) [21,24–27]. Recent findings indicate that the neural ectoderm isspecified in the blastula, before the Spemann’s organizereven forms [28]. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling isrequired at this stage to enable later neural differentiation[29, 30]. FGFs are a large class of secreted diffusibleglycoproteins that bind to four classes of extracellularreceptors (FGF receptors, FGFR) to mediate their effects[31]. These transmembrane receptors consist of an extracellular FGF-ligand-binding domain, a transmembranedomain, and an intracellular signaling domain [31]. It hasbeen demonstrated that overexpression of dominant negative forms of FGF receptors, which contain the FGF-bindingdomain but lack the intracellular domain, blocks thegeneration of neural tissue [32].Canonical Wnt signaling has also been implicated in theselection of neural or epidermal fate in Xenopus. Wntsignaling molecules are a large class of highly conservedsecreted glycoproteins, which participate in multipledevelopmental events during embryogenesis [33]. InXenopus, Wnt signaling activates a transcriptional corepressor of the iroquois family (Xiro1), which in turndownregulates BMP expression [34].Recently, the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family hasalso been shown to act as neural inducer in Xenopusectodermal explants [35]. IGFs signal through receptortyrosine kinases; the phosphorylation and the consequentinhibition of a transcription factor called Smad1 leads toneural induction [36]. As proposed by Pera et al. [36], IGFsand BMP antagonists induce neural tissue by a commonmechanism mediated by low levels of Smad1 activity.Loss of function of noggin, chordin, follistatin, orcerberus 1 in the mouse does not lead to defects in neuralinduction [37–40]. Double homozygous mutants ofchordin and noggin show loss of the prosencephalon[40]. In the zebrafish, loss of chordin in the chordinomutants leads to a decrease in the size of the neural plate[41]. By contrast, targeted null mutations in the mouseBmp2, Bmp4, or Bmp7 genes do not lead to changes in sizeof neural plate [42–45]. Mice lacking either Smad1 andSmad5 activity, two intracellular mediators of BMP signaltransduction components, die early in embryogenesis, butthese mutations have no effect on neuroectodermal fatespecification [46, 47]. Evaluation of BMP4 gene and itsinhibitor Noggin (NOG) has also been investigated as

204Fig. 2 Neural induction. Signals from the Spemann’s organizerinduce ectoderm to become anterior neural tissue. Secreted bonemorphogenetic protein (BMP) causes ectodermal cells to becomeepidermis and prevents ectoderm from executing its natural“default” tendency to differentiate into neural tissue. Chordin,follistatin, noggin, cerberus, Xnr3, and TSG (produced bySpemann’s organizer) block BMP signaling leading to thedorsalization of mesoderm and to neuralization of ectoderm. Xnr3,Xenopus nodal-related 3; TSG, twisted gastrulationcandidates in human NTDs. Four missense mutations inBMP4 and one in NOG were found, but it is likely thatthese mutations act together with other gene variants inindependently segregating loci [48].protein, are essential for both the canonical and noncanonical PCP pathway [57, 58]. Drosophila geneticsrevealed several other signaling components that arespecific to the PCP pathway, including Flamingo (Fmi),Strabismus (Stbm)/Van Gogh (Vangl), Prickle (Pk), Diego,RhoA, and Rho kinase [59–65]. A recent study has shownthat the PCP pathway might also be associated with ciliamorphogenesis. Disruption of Xenopus laevis orthologs oftwo fly PCP effector proteins, Inturned and Fuzzy, leads todefective neural tube closure [66]. The mutant embryos(Xint and Xfy) show failure of ciliogenesis as aconsequence of microtubules incorrectly orienting themselves. Moreover, accumulation of Dsh and Int near thebasal apparatus of cilia suggests that these proteins regulateciliogenesis through a conserved PCP pathway [66]. Therelationship between ciliary function and closure ofthe neural tube has been demonstrated in humans by theidentification of two genes (MSK1 and MSK3) responsiblefor Meckel syndrome, one of the major contributors tosyndromic NTDs, and potentially involved in the formationof the cilia apparatus [67, 68].Mutations in the mouse orthologs of the Drosophila PCPgenes result in the failure of neural tube closure. Fivemouse mutants, loop-tail (Lp), circle-tail (Crc), crash(Crsh), PTK, and dishevelled1/dishevelled2, harbor defectsin PCP genes and fail to undergo closure 1, which leads tocraniorachischisis [69–73]. The Lp gene, Vangl2 (alsoknown as Lpp1 or Ltap), has been shown to encode aprotein homologous to Drosophila strabismus [74]. Vangl2is expressed broadly in the neuroectoderm throughout earlyneurogenesis [75]. This and the fact that the gene wasaltered in two independent Lp alleles identified it as thelikely basis for the Lp phenotype. The Crsh mouse harborsNeural plate shapingIncreasing evidences suggest that the main driving force forneural plate shaping is convergence extension, a mediallydirected movement of the cells, with intercalation in themidline, which leads to narrowing and lengthening of theneural plate. In Xenopus, misexpression of dishevelled(Xdsh) produces disruption of convergence extension andNTDs because the broadened midline results in neuralfolds that are too far apart to meet [49]. These defects resultfrom the failure of the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway,which is instrumental in governing the polarization of cellswithin the plane of a cell sheet. PCP signals control cellpolarity during convergent extension (CE), an essentialprocess for vertebrate neural tube closure [49–55]. Veryrecently, Ciruna et al. [56] demonstrated a novel role forPCP signaling during neurulation. These authors demonstrated that PCP signaling polarizes neural progenitorsalong the AP axis. This polarity, which is transiently lostduring cell division in the neural keel, is reestablished asdaughter cells reintegrate into the neuroepithelium. ThePCP pathway is also referred to as the noncanonical Wntpathway, in contrast to the canonical Wnt pathway that actsvia stabilization and nuclear translocation of armadillo(Arm, β-catenin in vertebrates) (Fig. 3). Members ofFrizzled (Fz), a family of seven-transmembrane receptors,and Dishevelled (Dsh/Dvl), a cytoplasmic transducer

205Fig. 3 Canonical (Wnt/β-catenin pathway) and noncanonical (PCPpathway) Wnt signaling. Both pathways require the receptorFrizzled (Fz) and the cytoplasmic transducer Dishevelled (Dsh/Dvl). Dsh contains three conserved domains: the DIX, which isrequired for canonical Wnt signaling, the PDZ domain, and the DEPdomain, required for Dsh localization during PCP signaling.Canonical Wnt signaling is crucial in developmental processes,cell fate specification, and proliferation. In the absence of Wntsignals, a cytoplasmic protein complex, consisting of glycogensynthase kinase 3-β (GSK3-β), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC),and Axin, marks β-catenin for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Inresponse to a Wnt ligand, this degradation complex is inactivated,and stabilized β-catenin translocates to the nucleus, where itcombines with the T-cell factor (TCF), and stimulates target geneexpression. In contrast, the PCP pathway signals are transduced tothe cytoskeleton through the activation of small Rho GTPases(RhoA/Rac/Daam1) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). The PCPpathway requires a number of conserved proteins, includingFlamingo, Strabismus, Diego, and Prickle whose interactions havenot been defined. Scribble (Scrb1), a member of the LAP proteinfamily, is implicated in the PCP pathway potentially by interactionwith Vangl2 and with RhoA. In vertebrate embryos, similarmolecular requirements have been established for convergentextension (CE) movements and neural tube closure. The CEmovements involve convergence of cells toward the dorsal midline,mediolateral cell intercalations in the notochord, and neural tubeleading to extension of the body axisa mutation in Celsr1, a seven-pass transmembrane receptorthat encodes a protein orthologous to Drosophila Flamingo, also known as starry night [71]. Like Vangl2, this genealso functions in the PCP pathway. In the Crc mouse, apoint mutation was identified introducing a stop codon intothe apical cell polarity gene scribble (Scrb1), a PDZdomain-containing gene that is the ortholog of Drosophilascribble [76]. Scribble was not known to be a PCPcomponent in Drosophila. However, a polarity defect isobserved in the inner ear of Crc mice, suggesting that Scrb1does function in establishment of polarity in vertebrates[77]. A mutation in the protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7)gene, which encodes a conserved transmembrane proteinwith tyrosine kinase homology, disrupts neural tube closureand stereociliary bundle orientation and shows geneticinteraction with Lp [72]. These findings identify PTK7 as aregulator of the PCP pathway. Embryos that are double nullhomozygous for both dishevelled1 and dishevelled2

206(Dsh1 / /Dsh2 / ) also exhibit NTDs that closelyresemble the craniorachischisis phenotype of Lp andCrc [73].Components of the PCP pathway provide an excitingnew set of candidate genes for the analysis of humanNTDs. Combinations of mutations may act together toprovide the genetic risk for human defects. Collectively,these data point to the need to conduct a full analysis ofPCP genes to establish a role in the human population. Veryrecently, Doudney et al. [78] analyzed the coding andsplice site regions of human VANGL1 and VANGL2 genesin a collection of 66 patients with NTDs. These included 21patients with craniorachischisis, 24 with spina bifida, and21 with anencephaly. Only the 346G A variant inVANGL1 resulted in a nonsynonymous change (A116T).This variant was found in craniorachischisis and spinabifida patients at a similar frequency with respect toEuropean controls. An elevated frequency was observed inthe anencephalic patients, although this is unlikely to befunctionally significant. Overall, the data suggest thatVANGL gene mutations are not a major cause of the severehuman NTDs phenotypes.Dorsoventral (DV) patterning of the neural tubeThe neural tube of vertebrates develops a distinct DVpattern, with different cell types arising at differentpositions along the dorsoventral axis, including floorplate cells at the ventral midline, motor neurons in ventralregions, and sensory neurons and neural crest in dorsalregions. The generation of DV pattern in the developingspinal cord takes place after neural induction. It has beenrecognized that the surrounding and underlying mesodermis the major determinant of the DV structure of the neuraltube, rather than it being due to an intrinsic self-organizingcapacity (reviewed by Holtfreter and Hamburger [79]).Four classes of secreted factors have been implicated in theDV patterning: FGFs, retinoic acid (RA), sonic hedgehog(Shh), and BMP (Fig. 4). Firstly, FGFs, which areexpressed by the caudal mesoderm, must be switched off[80]. Secondly, RA that is produced in the paraxialmesoderm diffuses into the neural tube where it inducesdifferentiation in the neuroepithelium and inhibits FGFsignaling [81, 82]. RA induces ventral genes such Pax6,Irx3, Dbx1, and Dbx2, a group of homeodomain transcription factors [82]. Thirdly, Shh acts both locally and distallyin the control of cell fate in the ventral neural tube. Ectopicexpression of Shh in vivo and in vitro can induce thedifferentiation of floor-plate cells, motor neurons, andventral interneurons [83, 84]. Conversely, elimination ofShh signaling from the notochord by antibody blockade invitro [83, 84], or through gene targeting in mice [85],prevents the differentiation of floor-plate cells. Recentstudies have provided evidence that a group of homeodomain proteins expressed by ventral progenitor cells actsas intermediary factors in the realization of graded Shhsignaling [86–88]. The differential expression of five classI (Shh-repressed) proteins, Pax7, Irx3, Dbx1, Dbx2, andPax6, and two class II (Shh-induced) proteins, Nkx6.1 andNkx2.2, subdivides the ventral neural tube into fivecardinal progenitor domains [88–90]. Subsequently,cross-repressive interactions that occur between class Iand class II proteins refine the initially imprecise pattern ofhomeodomain protein expression initiated by graded Shhsignals [88].Finally, neuronal patterning in the dorsal half of thespinal cord requires the inductive activities of BMPsproduced in the overlying ectoderm and roof plate [91, 92].BMP provides positional information in dorsal and intermediate regions by setting borders of expression of targetgenes, in a similar fashion to Shh [92, 93]. Initially, BMPsact in conjunction with Shh to set expression boundariesfor the Pax genes. The Pax6 expression boundary thatmarks the border between dorsal and intermediate cells isrefined by the BMP-mediated activation of Msx1 in dorsalcells, which in turn represses Dbx2, a Dbx homeodomainprotein that is expressed in the intermediate region of theneural tube [94]. This generates two pools of progenitorcells (intermediate and dorsal) with distinct developmentalpotentials. In intermediate cells, BMPs contribute to thegeneration of overlapping patterns of homeobox proteinexpression; their regulation of Dbx1, Dbx2, and Pax7generates at least three distinct populations of progenitorcells [94]. In dorsal cells, the patterning information isprovided in part by mutually exclusive expression ofmembers of the basic helix-loop-helix (b-HLH) family ofproteins (Math, Mash, and Ngn) and LIM homeodomainproteins (Lbx and Lmx) [94, 95] (Fig. 4).Given the critical role of Pax proteins in nervous systempatterning, it is important to study the effect of loss-offunction mutations in Pax genes in both human and mice.Except Pax1 and Pax9, all members of Pax family havespatially and temporally restricted expression pattern in thedeveloping nervous system [96]. Thus far, mutations infour out of nine Pax genes have been associated to humandiseases (PAX1, PAX2, PAX3, and PAX6). Remarkably,mutations in Pax genes demonstrate that they play a criticalrole in specification and maintenance of structures that areneural crest-derived [97]. Mutation of the Pax3 gene causesthe Splotch phenotype in mice (Sp) (reviewed byChalepakis et al. [98]; Gruss and Walther [99]) andWaardenburg syndrome in humans [100–102]. Sp/Sp micehave malformations involving neural crest-derived tissues:NTDs (exencephaly and spina bifida), limb defects, anddysgenesis of spinal ganglia and heart structures. Loss offunction of the Pax6 gene causes the Small eye (Sey)phenotype in mice and the aniridia, a congenital disordercharacterized by complete or partial absence of eyestructures [103]. Pax7 null mice exhibit a loss of craniofacial structures that are neural crest-derived, whereasmutations in regulatory elements of Pax7 can lead tomuscle deficiency and rhabdomyosarcoma [104]. The roleof PAX1, PAX3, PAX7, and PAX9 genes in NTDs pathogenesis has been investigated in 79 sporadic and 38familial NTDs patients. In one patient with spina bifida, amutation in the PAX1 gene was detected changing aconserved amino acid in the paired domain of the protein.

207Fig. 4 Dorsoventral (DV) patterning of the neural tube. a Once theneural fate is specified, FGF (fibroblast growth factor), RA (retinoicacid), Shh (sonic hedgehog), and BMP (bone morphogeneticprotein) signaling determine the DV pattern of the neural tube.FGFs from the underlying mesoderm prevent neural differentiationof the overlying neural plate. The somites express RA thatantagonizes FGFs and induces a set of genes in the neural tube.The notochord differentiates and starts to express Shh. Shh is alsoexpressed by floor-plate cells and spreads dorsally in a concentration-dependent gradient. BMP starts to be produced by the roof-plate cells and later spreads ventrally in a concentration gradient.Another extracellular signal which is present in the roof plateinvolves Wnts. b The roof-plate BMP gradient and the floor-plateShh gradient direct cells along the dorsoventral axis to specify theirneuronal identity. There are six types of dorsal neurons (dl1–dl6)and five types of ventral neurons (V0–V3 and MN) in thedeveloping neural tube. On the left are the protein markers whichare used to identify the progenitor domains of the different DVregionsNo sequence variation was observed in the paired domainof the PAX7 and PAX9 genes. So far, these findings do notsupport a major role of the PAX genes in the etiology ofNTDs [105].FGF and Wnt signals that act before gastrulation to inducethe organizer to secrete inhibitors of BMP signaling such asnoggin, chordin, cerberus, and follistatin (reviewed byHarland [107]). In turn, these BMP antagonists induce theneuroectoderm to adopt an anterior fate. Basic FGFs(bFGFs) may act as the second signal in the two-step modelfor induction of the AP neural pattern [108]. Two groupstested the effect of bFGFs on animal caps of Xenopusembryos treated with neuralizing agents like noggin orfollistatin [109, 110]. Without bFGFs, these animal capsexpressed only anterior neural markers (Otx2 in forebrainand En-2 at mid/hindbrain border). When bFGF was alsoadded, both anterior and posterior neural markers (Krox-20and Hoxb9) were induced. In addition to FGFs, otherfactors like RA are involved in the AP patterning of theAntero-posterior (AP) patterning of the neural tubeA prevailing model for neural AP regionalization wasformulated by Nieuwkoop who proposed that this processoccurs in two steps: an “activation” step implying an initialinduction of anterior neural structures through all presumptive neuroectoderm; subsequently, a second transforming signal is produced by posterior mesoderm [106](Fig. 5). The major components of the activation signal are

208Fig. 5 Anteroposterior (AP)patterning of the neural tube.Neural A

sonic hedgehog signaling pathway, which regulates neural plate bending. Genes influencing neurulation have been investigated for their contribution to human neural tube defects, but only genes with well-established role in convergent extension provide an exciting new set o

Related Documents:

Neuroblast: an immature neuron. Neuroepithelium: a single layer of rapidly dividing neural stem cells situated adjacent to the lumen of the neural tube (ventricular zone). Neuropore: open portions of the neural tube. The unclosed cephalic and caudal parts of the neural tube are called anterior (cranial) and posterior (caudal) neuropores .

2) Braced tube 3) Bundled tube 4) Tube-in-tube 5) Tubed mega frames A.Tube in Tube Structures The term "tube in tube" is largely self-explanatory in that second ring of columns, the ring surrounding the central service core of the building, are used as an ineer framed or braced tbe. The purpose of the second tube is to increase

frame tube, braced tube, bundled tube, tube in tube, and tube mega frame structures. The tube in tube structures and tube mega frame structures are the innovative and fresh concept in . These tubes are interconnected by system of floor slabs and grid beams.as the columns of outer and inner core tubes are placed so closely; it is not seen as a .

markers are expressed in the dorsal neural tube (SOX9, SOX10, SNAI2, and FOXD3), the neural tube is closed, and the ectodermal cells are converging on the midline to cover the neural tube. (d, d 0 ) By HH9, the NC cells are beginning to undergo EMT and start detaching from the neural tube.

system between Tube in Tube system and Bundled tube system. The ETABS models of Tube in Tube and Bundled tube system which is G 20 Terrace storey, are considered for analysis. The modeling and analysis of the building has been done by using structure analysis tool ETABS2018.both the building models are subjected to gravity as well as seismic

reduce the defects. casting defects. An ANN model is developed In order to This paper presents a review of methods adopted by foundries to reduce defects and a new approach is proposed which will be helpful for foundries for controlling and reducing the defects) Keywords— Casting Defects, Data Mining, GMDH.

Casting defects analysis is process of finding the root cause of occurrence of defects in the rejection of casting and taking necessary steps to reduce the defects and to improve the casting yield. Taguchi method is used for analysis casting defects like sand and mould related defects such as sand drop, bad mould, blow holes, cuts and washes [1 .

Andreas Wagner, CEO Berlin Office Schiffbauerdamm 19, D-10117 Berlin Phone: 49-30-27595-141 Fax: 49-30-27595142 berlin@offshore-stiftung.de Varel Office Oldenburger Str. 65, D-26316 Varel Phone: 49-4451-9515-161 Fax: 49-4451-9515-249 varel@offshore-stiftung.de www.offshore-stiftung.de More news & information (German/English) 16 Backup Slides German Offshore Windfarms under Construction 2 .