Journal Of Materials Chemistry A - University Of South Florida

2y ago
5 Views
2 Downloads
1.39 MB
10 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Maxton Kershaw
Transcription

Journal ofMaterials Chemistry AView Article OnlinePublished on 16 September 2016. Downloaded by University of South Florida on 13/10/2016 18:13:41.PAPERView Journal View IssueCite this: J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4,15621Investigation of a microporous iron(III) porphyrinframework derived cathode catalyst in PEM fuelcells†N. M. Cantillo,*a G. A. Goenaga,a W. Gao,b K. Williams,b C. A. Neal,a S. Ma,b K. L. Morecand T. A. Zawodzinski, Jr.*acIn Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs) the thickness, structure and morphology of theelectrode layer play an important role in the cell performance. This effect becomes particularlysignificant when the cathode catalyst is based on a non-precious metal due to the higher catalystloadings required to compensate for the lower catalytic activity when compared to Pt based catalysts. Inthis study, an iron(III) porphyrin framework material was synthesized and pyrolyzed and its catalyticactivity towards the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) was evaluated using rotating disk electrode (RDE)experiments and single cell testing. Single cell performance was evaluated as a function of the electrodecatalyst loading (electrode thickness) and oxygen partial pressure. As expected, the ORR kineticoverpotential was the major contributor to the overall voltage loss. However, the mass transportReceived 13th April 2016Accepted 15th September 2016contribution to the voltage loss became more prominent with small increases in the cathode catalystDOI: 10.1039/c6ta03059aloading. The observed performance is discussed in the context of structure and morphology of thecatalyst layer (CL), analyzed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electronwww.rsc.org/MaterialsAmicroscopy (TEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD).IntroductionThe sluggish ORR accounts for most of the voltage loss inPEMFCS, even when the best Pt-based catalysts are employed.1This factor, in addition to the low availability and high cost ofPt, has motivated the search for non-precious metal catalysts(NPMCs) in order to decrease the cost and facilitate thecommercialization of PEMFCs.Among the evaluated NPMC alternatives, those derived fromheat-treated metal/nitrogen/carbon have produced the bestresults in terms of ORR activity.2–7 Although early studies mainlyfocused on materials obtained from transition-metal-basedmacrocycles,8,9 preparation of catalysts from pyrolyzed separatemetal, nitrogen, and carbon precursors has been widelyexplored since 1989.10 This approach offers a great variety ofpossibilities in terms of precursors and synthesis conditions.The precedent for this method was set by Yeager et al.,10 whoreported the use of poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) and a metalprecursor (cobalt or iron) loaded onto a carbon support andpyrolyzed at 800 C in argon. The materials obtained exhibitedaChemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of Tennessee,Knoxville, TN, USA. E-mail: ncantill@vols.utk.edubcDepartment of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USAOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, USA† Electronic s journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016available.SeeDOI:ORR activity comparable to that of heat-treated cobaltporphyrins.Yeager's work10 motivated the subsequent study of many othernitrogen containing compounds, including N-containing polymers as dual carbon and nitrogen precursors, which can facilitatethe formation of nitrogen containing sites on the graphiticcarbon surface during the catalyst synthesis.11 Studies involvingPAN plus metal12–14 have been reported, emphasizing theimportance of the simultaneous presence of the metal salt andthe nitrogen precursor during the heat treatment process.12 Someof this work explored PAN-based nanostructured materials, suchas aerogel composites,13 N-doped ordered porous carbons,14 andcarbon-nitride (CNx)/PAN nano bers15 as catalyst precursors.Substantial ORR activities were reported. Lalande et al.,16 in turn,explored the importance of different atoms (N, metal or both) inthe generation of the catalytic site by employing polyvinylferrocene as a nitrogen-free precursor. The material obtained through a single-step pyrolysis did not exhibit any catalyticactivity for the ORR. However, it was possible to obtain an activecatalyst through a second pyrolysis step in the presence ofa nitrogen source such as acetonitrile vapor.Heterocyclic polymers, particularly pyrrole derivatives, havealso been widely studied as nitrogen-containing precursorssince 1990.14,17–24 This provides the possibility to mimic theatomic con guration of metal-containing porphyrins. It isassumed that the metal atom bonds to pyrrole units, allowingthe formation of Me–N sites upon pyrolysis.20 Major progress inJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 15621–15630 15621

View Article OnlinePublished on 16 September 2016. Downloaded by University of South Florida on 13/10/2016 18:13:41.Journal of Materials Chemistry Aachieving fuel cell-relevant performance through this approachwas reported with the publication from Wood et al.25 In thiscase, nitroaniline was mixed with an anhydrous metal salt(generally an iron chloride) and polymerized in the presence ofcarbon, activated by ring in the presence of ammonia, andball-milled and subjected to an optional second ring, whichproved to be bene cial in terms of catalytic activity. Finally, themilled catalyst was acid washed to remove the leachable portionof transition metals. The material showed high ORR onsetvoltages, above 0.9 V, and a volumetric current density of 19A cm 3 at 0.8 V.Signi cant improvement was achieved with NPMCsprepared using heterocyclic polymers such as polyaniline(PANI)2,11,26–29 as precursors. Zelenay's group reporteda comparison of PANI and polypyrrole (PPy) as nitrogenprecursors for iron based catalyst synthesis,26 obtaining betterperformance with respect to stability and selectivity with theformer. Promising durability results were obtained with PANI–FeCo–C catalysts (700 hour-fuel cell performance test ata constant cell voltage of 0.4 V). These materials were synthesized by mixing a short-chain aniline oligomer with highsurface area carbon material, and transition metal precursors,followed by the addition of an oxidant to polymerize the aniline.A er polymerization, water was removed and the sample wassubjected to a 900 C heat treatment under a N2 atmosphere,leached in H2SO4 for 8 hours and subsequently subjected toa second heat treatment. High power density (0.38 W cm 2 at0.6 V) was reached in fuel cell operation (H2–O2)2 with thesematerials. PANI-based nanostructured materials have also beenstudied with promising results.15,28Advances have also been made through the enhancement ofthe mass-transport properties of the catalyst material.6,14,29–33 Inparticular, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have beenemployed due to the accessibility of metal cation in their structure, high volumetric density of metal-ion sites and high micropore surface area.34,35 Liu and co-workers30,31 were the rst toimplement this approach, selecting a cobalt-based zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF, a subclass of MOFs with imidazolate asligand) as a precursor for the synthesis of ORR catalysts throughpyrolysis. Maximum performance, with an onset potential of0.83 V, was achieved a er pyrolysis at a temperature of 750 C,comparable to the best cobalt-based NPMCs.36 In 2011, Dodelet'sgroup selected a Zn-based ZIF, covered with a small amount ofiron–phenanthroline complex as catalyst precursor.7 A powerdensity of 0.91 W cm 2 at 0.6 V (H2/O2, 1 bar gauge pressure,4 mg cm 2), comparable to that of a state-of-the-art platinumbased cathode having a loading of 0.3 mgPt cm 2, was reportedwith this material. However, the stability tests showed a signi cant decay in current density over 100 h of operation. Recentstudies with this material have involved the use of an ironporphyrin (as iron and nitrogen precursor), in order to study theeffect of the pyrolysis temperature on the resulting stability.35As an additional approach, amorphous porous organicpolymers (POPs), have been extensively studied over the lastdecade.37–41 Catalysts derived from these precursors exhibitexceptional characteristics in terms of surface area, uniformpore sizes, and stability. Recently, Ma et al. reported the15622 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 15621–15630Paperconstruction of a porphyrin-based conjugated porous organicpolymer, named CHF-1 (CHF denotes covalent heme framework), utilizing a custom-designed porphyrin complex, iron(III)meso-5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4-bromophenyl)porphyrin chloride(Fe(tbpp)Cl), as a building block.41 This material was designedas a biomimetic oxidation catalyst,41 but its potential as an ORRcatalyst is investigated in this work.To summarize the discussion above, important advanceshave been achieved with NPMCs in terms of catalytic activityand durability. However, to date only Olson et al.42 have reported a detailed study of the effect on performance of parameters such as CL thickness and composition in electrodes in fuelcells. Through a DE vs. i analysis on a cobalt-based cathodecatalyst, they found that transport limitations were appreciableeven at relatively low current density. The non-platinum CL inOlson's study includes the addition of PTFE-supported carbon(PTFE/C) composite powder.42In the present contribution, we study the ORR activity of theCHF-1 catalyst described above a er pyrolysis at 700 C underinert atmosphere. RDE and RRDE experiments are performed todetermine the onset potential and number of electrons transferred. The structure and properties of the material are characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanningelectron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and surfacearea analysis. Furthermore, this paper proposes a methodologyfor non-precious metal catalyst evaluation in low temperaturefuel cells under realistic operation conditions and proposesa methodology for non-precious metal catalyst evaluation, andidenti cation of the individual voltage loss contributions.ExperimentalCatalyst synthesis and activationThe CHF-1 was prepared according to the procedure describedpreviously.41 Brie y, iron(III) tetra (4-bromophenyl)porphyrinchloride was added to a solution of 2,20 -bipyridyl, bis(1,5cyclooctadiene)-nickel(0) and 1,5-cyclooctadiene in anhydrousDMF/1,4-dioxide. This mixture was stirred at room temperatureunder argon atmosphere overnight, and subsequently cooled inan ice bath. Finally, a 50% acetic acid solution was added andthe resulting mixture was stirred for another night and thenwashed and dried in vacuum to give CHF-1 in 78% yield.The as-synthesized materials exhibit very low ORR catalyticactivity as determined by the RDE experiment (Fig. 1A). Theprepared catalyst was thermally activated under inert atmosphere (N2 gas) at 700 C for 1 hour, based on previous experiments carried out in our laboratory (Fig. S1†). This was followedby acid treatment in 0.5 M H2SO4 at 80 C for 8 hours, with thepurpose of removing metal generated during pyrolysis.43 Thenthe sample is subjected to a second heat treatment at 700 C for1 hour in an inert atmosphere to promote the formation ofadditional catalytic centers.11Physicochemical characterizationThe surface area and the pore size and volume of the catalystswere measured with a Quantachrome Instruments Autosorb iQThis journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016

View Article OnlinePublished on 16 September 2016. Downloaded by University of South Florida on 13/10/2016 18:13:41.PaperJournal of Materials Chemistry Athree-electrode cell system with a gold wire counter electrodeand Hg/Hg2SO4 reference electrode saturated with 0.5 M H2SO4was used. The potential of the reference electrode vs. thereversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) was measured experimentally by saturating the electrolyte with hydrogen for at least30 minutes and measuring the open circuit potential using a Ptworking electrode. The potential was determined to be 0.696 Vvs. RHE. All potentials are reported vs. RHE.The working electrode consisted of a GC disk with a Pt ring(AFE7R9GCPT from Pine Instruments) with a collection efficiency of 37%. The electrode potential was controlled usinga multi-channel VSP3 potentiostat from BioLogic ScienceInstruments. The rotation speed of the working electrode wascontrolled with an AFMSRCE Pine Modulated Speed Rotator(MSR) and held constant at 1600 rpm. The experiments wereconducted in a 0.1 M H2SO4 solution at room temperature.Voltammograms were collected at 10 mV s 1 scan rate, staticand rotating, with the electrolyte saturated with nitrogen, forbackground correction, and oxygen. Before each experiment,the GC disk was mechanically polished with 5 mm and 0.05 mmsize alumina powder.RDE experiments were performed in solutions of electrolytesaturated with oxygen at different oxygen partial pressures. Forthis purpose, oxygen and argon were mixed using two highprecision Cole–Parmer multi-gas MC series mass ow controllers. The partial pressure of oxygen was varied from 5 to 100%.Membrane electrode assembly preparationRDE curves (A) for the as-prepared and pre-treated ironporphyrin framework (1600 rpm, 10 mV s 1 scan rate. 0.1 M H2SO4electrolyte, Hg/Hg2SO4 reference electrode and Au wire counterelectrode) and number of electrons transferred (B) for the pre-treatediron porphyrin framework catalyst (ring electrode is kept at 1.2 V).Fig. 1with nitrogen as the adsorbate. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) Pore Size ND Volume Analysis was employed for to analyze this data. The quanti cation ofthe metal was performed using Inductively Coupled Plasma/Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES).XRD, SEM and TEM were used to characterize the materials.XRD patterns were measured with a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer with Cu Ka radiation. For SEM imaging, a HitachiS-4800 eld emission scanning electron microscope wasemployed; this equipment features a resolution of 1.0 nm anda variable acceleration voltage of 0.5–30 kV. A 300 kV HF-3300TEM/STEM, with a cold- eld emission gun and 0.13 nm resolution was used to analyze the microstructure of the materials.To prepare electrodes for the FC experiments, cathode catalystinks were prepared by ultrasonically mixing 15 mg of thepyrolyzed/acid treated catalyst powder with 1 ml of deionizedwater, 2 ml of isopropanol and 175 mg of 5 wt% Na on solution. The ink was sprayed onto a 5 cm2 gas diffusion layer(GDL) using an airbrush, until the desired catalyst loading wasreached (1 mgcat cm 2, 2 mgcat cm 2 and 3 mgcat cm 2). Thecathode CL thickness was measured for each loading, using anAbsolute Mitutoyo Digimatic Indicator (Model ID-S112PE).GDLs made of carbon paper with a carbon coating(SIGRACET Gas Diffusion Media, Type GDL 25 BC) were usedfor both electrodes. The Na on content in the dry cathode was30 wt%, which corresponds to the ratio that provided the bestresults in a previous study performed in our laboratory(Fig. S3†). The anode electrodes, on the other hand, wereprepared by hand painting. The anode ink was prepared fromBASF 30% platinum on Vulcan XC-72. Anode loadings were0.3 mgPt cm 2 with a 2 : 1 ionomer : Pt ratio. The cathode andanode electrodes were hot-pressed against either side of a 212Na on membrane at 140 C for 10 minutes using a load of1000 kg.Rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) experimentsInks were prepared by mixing 5 mg of the catalysts with 5 wt%Na on solution (Sigma-Aldrich) in a 30/70 ionomer to catalystratio, with methanol as the solvent. Inks were stirred for at leastone day and sonicated for 10 minutes before preparing theelectrodes. 15 ml of the ink was deposited on a glassy carbon(GC) electrode disk to achieve loadings of 600 mg cm 2. A typicalThis journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016Fuel cell testingSingle cell experiments on the prepared MEAs were performedusing a Fuel Cell Technologies test stand and single cell hardware. A BioLogic VSP3 potentiostat with a 10 A booster was usedto collect polarization curves and electrochemical impedancespectroscopy (EIS) data. The cell has a serpentine ow channelJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 15621–15630 15623

View Article OnlinePublished on 16 September 2016. Downloaded by University of South Florida on 13/10/2016 18:13:41.Journal of Materials Chemistry Aand an active area of 5 cm2. The temperature for all experimentswas 80 C, backpressure at both electrodes was 29.4 bar psia,and all gases were at 100% relative humidity (RH). The ow rateof ultra-high purity (UHP) H2 at the anode was held constant at0.1 L min 1 and UHP O2 ow was kept at 0.2 L min 1.The testing protocol was the following: the cell was held atopen circuit voltage (OCV) for 10 minutes; then the voltage washeld at 0.6 V for 15 min, followed by 0.4 V for 10 min forconditioning. A polarization curve was obtained by changingthe potential from OCV to 0.2 V, decreasing the potential insteps of 2 mV from OCV to 0.65 and 20 mV from 0.65 V to 0.2 V,each potential was held constant for 30 seconds beforerecording the current. Measurements were performed withdifferent oxygen partial pressures in the cathode feed, rangingfrom 20 to 100%, obtained by mixing oxygen and argon gases, asdescribed above. All overpotentials are reported using thereversible OCV as reference.To evaluate the behavior of our catalyst in an actual fuel cell,we need to disentangle kinetic and mass transport effects. Wedo this using a series of approaches. First, we compare thepolarization curves obtained for a series of different loadings of‘catalyst’. Since we do not know the total number of catalystsites in the catalyst used, we simply refer to the loading ofcarbon powder containing the active sites formed duringpyrolysis. We have also increased the number of data pointsobtained in the kinetic region of the polarization curve. Thisregion is generally underdetermined in most polarizationstudies of fuel cells regardless of catalyst type, resulting in a lackof data points for tting of kinetic parameters. We also useoxygen partial pressure as a variable to generate additionalinformation about both kinetics and mass transport.PaperFig. 2 High-resolution (HR) TEM images of the 700 C pyrolyzediron porphyrin framework based catalyst (A) HRTEM image of theiron nanoparticle distribution on the catalyst structure. (B) HRTEMimage showing an onion-like mesographitic nanoshell surroundingFe particle. (C) HRTEM image showing the mesographitic structureof the carbon support. (D) HRTEM image of a typical non-preciousmetal catalyst nanostructure involving carbon and metalaggregates.Results and discussionPhysicochemical characterizationTEM images of the CHF-1 catalyst pyrolyzed at 700 C are presented in Fig. 2. These images show the presence of Fe particlesdistributed throughout the carbon structure (Fig. 2A). Theaverage Fe particle size calculated from the images is 13 nm.The presence of a shell of graphite can be observed (Fig. 2B),as has been reported previously with iron(III) tetramethoxyphenyl porphyrin chloride (FeTMPP-Cl) pyrolyzed at 1000 C(ref. 44) and polyaniline derived electrocatalysts at 900 C.2Particles surrounded by graphitic shell exhibit a higher resistance to dissolution in acidic medium and therefore higherstability in the fuel cell environment. The carbon structureobserved by TEM imaging (Fig. 2C and D) is de ned as turbostratic or mesographitic, given that the basal planes are notwell-aligned compared to an ideal fully graphitized carbonstructure.SEM images of the as-synthesized (Fig. 3A and B), 700 Cpyrolyzed (Fig. 3C and D) and acid treated with a second 700 Cheat treatment (Fig. 3E and F) samples. The images A, C and Eare the back-scattered electron (BSE) images. As expected, theas-synthesized material (Fig. 3A) does not exhibit metal particles formation, given that at this point the iron is embedded inthe organic structure. However, in the heat treated samples15624 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 15621–15630Fig. 3 Back-scattered and secondary electron images of the highlyporous as-synthesized (A and B), 700 C pyrolyzed (C and D)showing the presence of iron nanoparticles, and acid treated (E andF) CHF-1 catalyst. The latter exhibits a lower density of metal particles and a higher porosity (Table 2) as a result of the acid leachingprocess.This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016

View Article OnlinePublished on 16 September 2016. Downloaded by University of South Florida on 13/10/2016 18:13:41.PaperJournal of Materials Chemistry Abefore (Fig. 3C) and a er (Fig. 3E) acid treatment, the Feparticles formed during the pyrolysis process are easily visualized (due to its higher atomic number). The particles showa uniform distribution throughout the sample, with the presence of few agglomerates, both before and a er acid treatment.In agreement with previous observations by Ma et al.,41 the assynthesized CHF-1 (Fig. 3A and B) structure is composed ofagglomerated ball-shaped particles (200–400 nm diameter),exhibiting a high surface area and pore volume (0.442 cm3 g 1),as con rmed through BET results (see Table 1). On the otherhand, the samples a er pyrolysis (Fig. 3C–F) exhibit moreextensive agglomeration and a heterogeneous particle sizedistribution, which causes an evident decrease of the surfacearea and pore volume (Table 1). However, it is worth noting thatthe sample subjected to acid leaching (Fig. 3E and F), not onlyexhibits a lower density of metallic particles, but a betterde ned structure in terms of exposed area and porosity(Table 1).The metal content was evaluated though ICP-OES and SEMbased energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis(Table 2), showing a decrease of 50% in the Fe content a er acidtreatment. Differences in the composition measured with thetwo techniques can be related to the volume of materialanalyzed using the SEM-EDS technique, in comparison toICP-OES, which is a bulk composition analysis technique.The XRD patterns corresponding to the as-synthesized andpyrolyzed (before and a er the acid treatment) samples arepresented in Fig. 4. The presence of graphitic carbon (2q ¼ 26 )and metallic Fe (110) (2q ¼ 45 ) can be appreciated in bothpyrolyzed samples (before and a er acid treatment), in agreement with the observations made from TEM and SEM images.Catalytic activity: RRDE techniqueFig. 1 shows the RDE plots for the as-synthesized and pyrolyzed(before and a er acid treatment) samples (A) and the number ofelectrons transferred measured using RRDE with a Pt ring (B).From Fig. 1A, it can be observed that the as-synthesized materialTable 1BET measurements of materialMaterialBET surface area[m2 g 1]Pore volume[cm3 g 1]CHF-1 (Fe) (as-prepared)CHF-1 (700 C)CHF-1 (700 C AT 700 C)1526.326288.883393.3890.4420.1000.129Fe content of material before and after heat/acid treatmentmeasured with ICP-OES and EDSFig. 4 Cu Ka X-ray diffraction patterns for the as-prepared catalyst(CHF-1), the catalyst after 700 C heat treatment (HT), and the catalystafter 700 C heat treatment followed by acid treatment and final700 C heat treatment (HT AT HT).does not show signi cant activity towards the ORR ( 0.048 Vonset potential). The samples subjected to heat treatmentexhibit a signi cant improvement in catalytic activity with anonset potential of 0.868 V and 0.861 V (measured at thepotential at which the current density reaches 50 mA cm 2) forthe samples before and a er acid treatment, respectively. Thisincrease in the onset potential (compared to the as-preparedsample) has been correlated with the graphite shell formation(Fig. 2B) in previous studies.44 The acid-treated sample yieldeda higher limiting current density. The higher current densitycould be explained by the removal of excess metallic particlesthat could potentially hinder the access of the reactants to theactive sites (Table 2) or by the rearrangement of the catalyststructure through the second heat-treatment that can lead tothe formation of new active sites.The number of electrons transferred calculated throughRRDE was 3.8 electrons in the limiting current region, asobserved in Fig. 1B for the pyrolyzed samples (before and a eracid treatment), which implies that the peroxide production isapproximately 10% of the product. This result suggests that thereaction is mainly proceeding through the four-electron transfer path.When the oxygen partial pressure is varied, the currentdensity on the RDE plots changes as a function of the oxygenpartial pressure. As an example, plots for 20, 40, 60, 80 and100% oxygen are shown in Fig. 5. The inset plot shows the directcorrelation between the oxygen partial pressure and the limitingcurrent density.Table 2MaterialICP-OES Fe content(%)EDS Fe content(%)CHF-1 (as-prepared)CHF-1 (700 C AT 700 C)5.643.8411.825.73This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016Fuel cell testingThe iRU-free polarization and resistance curves obtained fromMEAs comprising iron porphyrin framework based cathodeswith different catalyst loadings (1 mgcat cm 2, 2 mgcat cm 2 and3 mgcat cm 2) are shown in Fig. 6. The current density, which isrelatively low (#2 10 5 A cm 2) above 0.7 V, increases toJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 15621–15630 15625

View Article OnlinePublished on 16 September 2016. Downloaded by University of South Florida on 13/10/2016 18:13:41.Journal of Materials Chemistry AFig. 5 RDE curves for the pre-treated iron porphyrin framework atdifferent oxygen partial pressures. 1600 rpm, 10 mV s 1 scan rate. 0.1M H2SO4 electrolyte, Hg/Hg2SO4 reference electrode and Au wirecounter electrode.PaperPolarization curves for PEM fuel cells with 2 mgcat cm 2cathode catalyst loading and oxygen partial pressure variation: 20% O2(SF: 2.8), 40% O2 (SF: 5.2), 60% O2 (SF: 7.5), 80% O2 (SF: 9.5) and 100%O2 (SF: 11.5). The curves were obtained with inlet gases heated andhumidified to 83 C, 2 atm backpressure and the cell temperature washeld at 80 C (SF: cathode stoichiometric flow at 1 A cm 2).Fig. 7voltage are observed in most regions of the polarization curve.To further interpret these results, we must analyze both kineticsand mass transport aspects revealed by the data.The iRU-free polarization curves acquired with differentcatalyst loadings and oxygen partial pressure were analyzedusing the Tafel equation (eqn (1)) at low current densities wheremass-transfer effects can be neglected. Hydrogen crossover isassumed to assert minimal in uence on the observed kinetics.hact ¼ a b log(i)(1)where,Fig. 6 Polarization and resistance curves for H2–O2 PEM fuel cellswith different cathode catalyst loadings: 1 mgcat cm 2 ( ), 2 mgcatcm 2 ( ) and 3 mgcat cm 2 ( ). The curves were obtained with inletgases heated and humidified to 83 C, 2 atm backpressure and the celltemperature was held at 80 C.ca. 0.10 A cm 2 at 0.6 V for all loadings. The maximum powerdensity for 2 mgcat cm 2 is 0.46 W cm 2, for 1 mgcat cm 2catalyst loading is 0.32 W cm 2 compared with 0.22 W cm 2 for3 mgcat cm 2, suggesting a signi cant in uence of the CLloading on the performance of the PEMFC. A loading of 2 mgcatcm 2 provided the best results in terms of FC performance. Thisdata, obtained at 100% O2, gives a rst glimpse of the behaviorof this system. The stability of this material is discussed in theESI (Fig. S3†).To provide data for a more extensive analysis, we probe thein uence of oxygen partial pressure variations on the performance of the material, shown for the best performing loading(2 mgcat cm 2) in Fig. 7. This data is typical of all loadings.Signi cant decreases in current density obtained at a given cell15626 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 15621–15630a¼2:3RT2:3RTlogði0 Þ and b ¼ aFaF(1a)where hact is the activation overpotential associated mainly withthe sluggish O2 reduction reaction kinetics, a and b are the Tafelparameters, i0 is the exchange current, a is the cathodic transfercoefficient, R is the gas constant, F is the Faraday constant andT is the cell temperature.Taking a and b as free parameters, least squares tting wasapplied to nd the best ts of eqn (4) to the polarization curves atthe Tafel region (i.e. low current densities 0.1A cm 2). The masstransport and proton conduction contributions in this regionwere found to be negligible based on an impedance analysis(Fig. S4–S7†) as well as by comparing mass transport jlim to thecurrent range over which the kinetic analysis was carried out.This is described in detail in the ESI.† A representative curveacquired with the best-performing loading and a 100% oxygenpartial pressure is shown in Fig. 8A. In all cases, two regimeswere observed. For low cell voltages (‘Zone 1’, h 0.45 V i.e. Ecell 0.7 V), the average Tafel slope is high (118.0 8.9 mV perdecade), and at high cell voltages (‘Zone 2’, h # 0.45 i.e. Ecell 0.7This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016

View Article OnlinePublished on 16 September 2016. Downloaded by University of South Florida on 13/10/2016 18:13:41.PaperV) the average Tafel slope is lower (53.6 8.2 mV per decade).Table 3 contains the parameters obtained from the ts for allcurves. Unlike the case of Pt or Pt alloy catalysts, in which twoTafel slopes are also observed, it is unlikely that the kinetics isaffected by the formation of oxides or other surface reactions indifferent potential regimes. We speculate that the presence ofthese two well-de ned regimes could be related to the interactionwith two different types of catalytic active sites (perhaps Fe–N4/Cand Fe–N2/C43,45). The presence of these two types of sites hasbeen suggested in cases where an Fe and N precursor aresimultaneously present in the pyrolysis process.43,45 We also notethat the two types of catalyst sites would then have radicallydifferent intrinsic rates based on expected values of i0. At thispoint, we forgo a more detailed interpretation given the difficulties of exactly estimating this parameter for ORR via anunknown reaction. The pa

XRD patterns were measured with a Bruker D2 Phaser diffrac-tometer with Cu Ka radiation. For SEM imaging, a Hitachi S-4800 eld emission scanning electron microscope was employed; this equipment features a resolution of 1.0 nm and a var

Related Documents:

Chemistry ORU CH 210 Organic Chemistry I CHE 211 1,3 Chemistry OSU-OKC CH 210 Organic Chemistry I CHEM 2055 1,3,5 Chemistry OU CH 210 Organic Chemistry I CHEM 3064 1 Chemistry RCC CH 210 Organic Chemistry I CHEM 2115 1,3,5 Chemistry RSC CH 210 Organic Chemistry I CHEM 2103 1,3 Chemistry RSC CH 210 Organic Chemistry I CHEM 2112 1,3

Physical chemistry: Equilibria Physical chemistry: Reaction kinetics Inorganic chemistry: The Periodic Table: chemical periodicity Inorganic chemistry: Group 2 Inorganic chemistry: Group 17 Inorganic chemistry: An introduction to the chemistry of transition elements Inorganic chemistry: Nitrogen and sulfur Organic chemistry: Introductory topics

Accelerated Chemistry I and Accelerated Chemistry Lab I and Accelerated Chemistry II and Accelerated Chemistry Lab II (preferred sequence) CHEM 102 & CHEM 103 & CHEM 104 & CHEM 105 General Chemistry I and General Chemistry Lab I and General Chemistry II and General Chemistry Lab II (with advisor approval) Organic chemistry, select from: 9-10

CHEM 0350 Organic Chemistry 1 CHEM 0360 Organic Chemistry 1 CHEM 0500 Inorganic Chemistry 1 CHEM 1140 Physical Chemistry: Quantum Chemistry 1 1 . Chemistry at Brown equivalent or greater in scope and scale to work the studen

o Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics (IJBB) o Indian Journal of Biotechnology (IJBT) o Indian Journal of Chemistry, Sec A (IJC-A) o Indian Journal of Chemistry, Sec B (IJC-B) o Indian Journal of Chemical Technology (IJCT) o Indian Journal of Experimental Biology (IJEB) o Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences (IJEMS) .

Chemistry is the science that describes matter, its properties, the changes it undergoes, and the energy changes that accompany those processes. Inorganic chemistry Organic chemistry Physical chemistry Biochemistry Applied Chemistry: Analytical chemistry, Pharmaceutical Chemistry, . Istv an Szalai (E otv os University) Lecture 1 6 / 45

Chemistry of Cycloalkanes 13. Chemistry of Alkyl halides 14. Alcohols 15. Chemistry of Ethers and Epoxides 16. Chemistry of Benzene and Aromaticity 17. Chemistry of Aryl Halides 18. Aromatic Sulphonic Acids 19. Chemistry of Aldehydes and Ketones 20. Carboxylic Acids 21. Chemistry of Carboxylic Acid Derivativ

ADVANCED DIPLOMA Diploma in Chemistry 60% in Analytical Chemistry 3 Theory & Practical, Chemical Quality Assurance, Mathematics 2 Chemical Industrial 1 or S5 Subjects and Chemistry project II. Semester 1 Analytical Chemistry IV Physical Chemistry IV Research Methodology in Chemistry Semester 2 Inorganic Chemistry IV Organic Chemistry IV .