Final Report I-10 From Tangerine Road To Ina Road Study

2y ago
39 Views
2 Downloads
5.32 MB
98 Pages
Last View : 17d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Grady Mosby
Transcription

Interstate 10 Corridor Study, Tangerine Road to Ina RoadFinal Design Concept ReportADOT Project No.: 010 PM 240 H7960 01LFederal Aid No.: 010-D(209)AVolume 1 of 2February 2014

Final Design Concept ReportI-10 Corridor Study, Tangerine Road to Ina Road Table of Contents3.2ALTERNATIVES PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED . 513.2.1I-10 Typical Section . 513.2.2Traffic Interchange Locations . 513.2.3Crossroad Alignment Options . 523.2.4Traffic Interchange Configurations . 533.2.5Recommendations from Alternative Selection Report . 533.3DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES. 543.3.1No-Build Alternative . 543.3.2Build Alternative . 543.4ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION. 56No-Build Alternative Evaluation . 563.4.13.4.2Build Alternative Evaluation. 563.5RECOMMENDATIONS . 564.0MAJOR DESIGN FEATURES OF THE RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE . 574.1INTRODUCTION . 574.2DESIGN CONTROLS . 574.3ROADWAY . 574.4ACCESS CONTROL . 584.5RIGHT-OF-WAY . 634.6DRAINAGE. 644.6.1Existing Cross Drainage Facilities . 644.6.2Proposed Cross Drainage Improvements. 654.6.3Pavement Drainage . 654.6.4FEMA Floodplains . 654.6.5Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act . 664.7STRUCTURES . 664.7.1Bridge Structures . 664.7.2Retaining Wall Structures . 664.7.3Noise Barriers . 674.8TRAFFIC DESIGN. 684.8.1Signing and Pavement Marking . 684.8.2Freeway Management System. 684.8.3Lighting and Signals . 684.9UTILITY AND RAILROAD COORDINATION . 694.10EARTHWORK . 714.11GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMENT DESIGN . 714.11.1New Bridge Structures . 714.11.2Retaining Walls and Noise Barriers . 714.11.3Drilled Shaft Construction . 714.11.4Subsurface Conditions . 724.11.5Pavement Structural Sections . 724.12CONSTRUCTION PHASING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL . 724.13WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY . 734.14TRANSIT AND PARK-AND-RIDE LOTS . 744.15BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES . 744.15.1Bicycles. 744.15.2Pedestrians . 744.16DESIGN EXCEPTIONS . 754.17INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS . 75EX.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . EX-1EX.1 NEED FOR THE PROJECT . EX-1EX.2 DESIGN CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES . EX-3EX.3 MAJOR DESIGN FEATURES OF THE RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE . EX-3EX.4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT . EX-5EX.5 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN . EX-6EX.6 ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS . EX-7EX.7 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT . EX-71.0INTRODUCTION . 11.1FORWARD. 11.2NEED FOR THE PROJECT . 11.3PROJECT DESCRIPTION . 41.3.1Proposed Roadway Improvements . 41.3.2Right-of-Way . 41.3.3Structures . 41.3.4Drainage . 41.3.5Utilities . 51.4PROJECT OBJECTIVE . 51.4.1Public Involvement . 51.4.2Project Website. 51.5CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CORRIDOR . 51.5.1Roadway Characteristics . 61.5.2Transit Facilities and Routes/Park-and-Ride Lots . 71.5.3Land Use . 71.5.4Utilities and Railroad . 81.5.5Drainage . 91.5.6Right-of-Way . 111.5.7Structures . 111.5.8Signing and Lighting . 131.5.9Geotechnical . 131.5.10Existing Pavement Structural Sections. 142.0CRASH AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS . 152.1CRASH ANALYSIS . 152.2EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS . 162.3FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS. 202.3.1Description of Alternatives . 202.3.2Traffic Volume Projections . 202.4OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. 272.4.1Freeway Analysis Methodology . 272.4.2Interchange Analysis Methodology . 272.4.3Freeway Analysis Results . 282.4.4Interchange Analysis Results . 283.0DESIGN CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES . 513.1INTRODUCTION . 51Page-iFebruary 2014

Final Design Concept ReportI-10 Corridor Study, Tangerine Road to Ina Road 5.0ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS . 765.1OVERALL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE . 765.2ESTIMATE OF FUTURE MAINTENANCE COSTS . 786.0IMPLEMENTATION PLAN . 796.1INTRODUCTION . 796.2PHASE I – RECONSTRUCT THE CORTARO ROAD TI, I-10 AND FRONTAGE ROADS . 796.3PHASE II - RECONSTRUCT THE AVRA VALLEY ROAD TI, I-10 AND FRONTAGE ROADS . 806.4PHASE III - EXPAND I-10 TO A TEN-LANE FREEWAY . 807.0AASHTO CONTROLLING DESIGN CRITERIA . 817.1AASHTO NON-CONFORMING GEOMETRIC DESIGN ELEMENTS . 817.2REQUEST FOR AASHTO DESIGN EXCEPTION . 818.0SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS . 818.1LAND OWNERSHIP, JURISDICTION, AND USE . 818.2SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS . 818.3TITLE VI AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE . 818.4CULTURAL RESOURCES . 818.5SECTION 4(f) RESOURCES. 828.6SECTION 6(f) RESOURCES. 828.7AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS . 828.8TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS . 828.9WATER RESOURCES . 828.10SOLE SOURCE AQUIFERS . 828.11BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES . 838.11.1Vegetation and Invasive Species . 838.11.2Threatened/Endangered Species, Designated Critical Habitat, and Sensitive Species . 838.12PRIME AND UNIQUE FARMLANDS . 838.13HAZARDOUS MATERIALS . 83Figure 2.13 – I-10/Avra Valley Road TI 2040 No-Build Traffic Projections & Lane Configuration . 49Figure 2.14 – I-10/Cortaro Road TI 2040 No-Build Traffic Projections & Lane Configuration . 49Figure 2.15 – I-10/Avra Valley Road TI 2040 Build Traffic Projections & Lane Configuration . 50Figure 2.16 – I-10/Cortaro Road TI 2040 Build Traffic Projections & Lane Configuration. 50Figure 3.1 – I-10 Build Alternative Typical Section . 55Figure 4.1 – Access Control at Ramp/Frontage Road with Crossroad . 59Figure 4.2 – Avra Valley Road Access Points . 61Figure 4.3 – Cortaro Road Access Points. 62Figure 4.4 – East-West Phasing Approach . 72Figure 4.5 – I-10 Mainline and Frontage Road Detours . 73Figure 4.6 – I-10 Mainline Crossover. 73Figure 4.7 – Proposed Drainage/Utility Facility Construction . 73List of TablesTable EX-1 - Summary of Estimated Cost . EX-7Table 1.1 – Projected Population Growth . 3Table 1.2 – Previous Projects. 5Table 1.3 – Preliminary Utility and Facility Inventory . 8Table 1.4 – Existing UPRR Crossings . 9Table 1.5 – Existing ADOT Right-of-Way . 11Table 1.6 – Existing Structure Inventory . 12Table 1.7 – Existing Sign Structures. 13Table 2.1 – Crash Summary by Location and Severity . 15Table 2.2 – Crash Data at Cortaro Road/UPRR Crossing . 16Table 2.3 – Historic Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Day) . 16Table 2.4 – Existing and Future Traffic Volumes . 20Table 2.5 – Vehicle Densities and Corresponding Levels-of-Service . 27Table 2.6 – Intersection Delay and Corresponding Levels-of-Service. 27Table 2.7 – Existing Crossroads Truck Percentages . 28Table 2.8 – Interchange Analysis Results . 29Table 4.1 – Design Controls . 57Table 4.2 – Right-of-Way Requirements . 63Table 4.3 – Existing Cross Drainage Structures . 64Table 4.4 – Proposed Cross Drainage Improvements . 65Table 4.5 – Approximate 100-Year Water Surface Elevations at Four Locations . 66Table 4.6 – Proposed Bridge Structures . 66Table 4.7 – Summary of Proposed Retaining Walls . 67Table 4.8 – Proposed Location of Dynamic Message Signs . 68Table 4.9 – Major Utilities and Anticipated Conflicts . 69Table 4.10 – Summary of Existing and Preliminary Recommended Foundation Types for I-10 Bridges . 71Table 4.11 – Limits of Overexcavation Performed for Construction of I-10 Within the Project Limits . 72Table 4.12 – Preliminary Pavement Structural Sections . 72Table 5.1 – Estimate of Probable Project Costs for the Cortaro Road TI Improvements (Phase I) . 76Table 5.2 – Estimate of Probable Project Costs for the Avra Valley Road TI Improvements (Phase II) . 77Table 5.3 – Estimate of Probable Project Costs for the I-10 Expansion to Ten Lanes (Phase III) . 78Table 5.4 – Future Maintenance Costs. 78Table 6.1 – I-10 Mainline Traffic Projections. 79List of FiguresFigure EX.1 – Project Location Map . EX-2Figure EX.2 – Vicinity Map . EX-2Figure EX-3 – I-10 Build Alternative Typical Section . EX-4Figure 1.1 – Project Location Map. 2Figure 1.2 – Vicinity Map . 2Figure 1.3 – Cortaro Road TI Looking South . 11Figure 2.1 – Crash Rate by Mileposts . 16Figure 2.2 – 2011 Existing Volumes & Lane Configuration . 17Figure 2.3 – 2040 No-Build Traffic Projections & Lane Configuration . 21Figure 2.4 – 2040 Build Traffic Projections & Lane Configuration . 24Figure 2.5 – 2011 Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service . 30Figure 2.6 – 2011 Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service . 33Figure 2.7 – 2040 No-Build Alternative AM Peak Hour Level Of Service . 36Figure 2.8 – 2040 No-Build Alternative PM Peak Hour Level Of Service . 39Figure 2.9 – 2040 Build Alternative AM Peak Hour Level Of Service . 42Figure 2.10 – 2040 Build Alternative PM Peak Hour Level Of Service . 45Figure 2.11 – I-10/Avra Valley Road TI 2011 Existing Volumes & Lane Configuration . 48Figure 2.12 – I-10/Cortaro Road TI 2011 Existing Volumes & Lane Configuration . 48Page-iiFebruary 2014

Final Design Concept ReportI-10 Corridor Study, Tangerine Road to Ina Road List of AppendicesAppendix A – Agency and Public Meeting MaterialsAppendix B – Existing Conditions Plan SheetsAppendix C – Inventory of Existing Pavement Structural SectionsAppendix D – Stage II Plans for Recommended AlternativeAppendix E – Environmental OverviewAppendix F – Agency Coordination LettersPage-iiiFebruary 2014

Final Design Concept ReportI-10 Corridor Study, Tangerine Road to Ina Road Continuous two-lane, one-way frontage roadsReconstructing the Avra Valley Road TI to:o Shift the alignment approximately 80 feet east of the existing alignmento Pass over I-10o Widen Avra Valley Road to include a raised curbed median, four travel lanes (two travellanes in each direction) and left- and right-turn lanes as warrantedo Accommodate the future extension of Avra Valley Road to the north over the UPRR by theTown of Marana or othersReconstructing the Cortaro Road TI to:o Shift the alignment approximately 100 feet east of the existing alignmento Pass over I-10 and the UPRRo Widen Cortaro Road to include a raised curbed median, six travel lanes (three travel lanesin each direction) and left- and right-turn lanes as warrantedEX.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis Final Design Concept Report (DCR) describes the development, evaluation and recommendation ofimprovements to increase the capacity of Interstate 10 (I-10) between Tangerine Road (approximatemilepost (MP) 240.5) and Ina Road (approximate MP 248.7), for a total length of approximately eight miles.The project limits, as designated by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), extend from MP240.0 to MP 247.5. The proposed improvements shown in the DCR plans begin at existing I-10 Station4553 98 (MP 239.9) and end at existing I-10 Station 4993 00 (MP 248.2). This project is located inADOT’s Tucson District within Pima County in south-central Arizona. Project location and vicinity maps areprovided with Figures EX.1 and EX.2, respectively.The goal of this project is to develop and objectively evaluate transportation alternatives in order to moveahead a long-term master plan for this segment of I-10 in accordance with the approved regional and localtransportation plans, and other recently completed or on-going studies along I-10. This project will seek tooptimize the traffic operations within the corridor for the projected design year 2040 traffic demand, and tominimize or mitigate impacts the improvements may have on the surrounding community. Otherdocuments prepared to support this DCR include the following:The Recommended Alternative would:Operate at LOS ‘D’ or better during peak hours on all segments of the I-10 mainline and at the AvraValley Road and Cortaro Road TIs based on the traffic analysis performed with the projected 2040traffic volumesSupport the designation of I-10 as part of the CANAMEX trade corridor by maintaining acceptablelevels of service through the corridorReconstruct the frontage roads to be continuous and one-way; thereby providing a parallel route toI-10Upgrade the existing facilities to current design standards and practices. The drainage facilitiesconstructed with the Twin Peaks Road TI improvements would remain in placeEliminate vehicle-train conflicts on Cortaro Road. If the Town of Marana extends Avra Valley Roadto the north, the proposed improvements at Avra Valley Road would allow the northward extensionof this roadway with an overpass of the UPRR.Be compatible with ADOT, Town of Marana and Pima County long-range plansAlternative Selection ReportFinal Traffic ReportPreliminary Drainage ReportPreliminary Geotechnical ReportPreliminary Structure Selection ReportsEX.1 NEED FOR THE PROJECTI-10 is an existing freeway traversing the northern and eastern areas of Pima County. It is a majorcommercial corridor for intrastate, interstate, and international commerce. I-10 is one of the majorinterstate highways crossing Arizona and is part of an intercontinental corridor connecting the east andwest coasts of the United States (US). I-10 provides mobility for the communities along its route, and is aprimary carrier of commerce and interstate travel across the US.The improvements to the I-10 corridor are needed to address:Increased travel demand and traffic congestionCompromised efficiency of the Canada-America-Mexico (CANAMEX) Trade Corridor, aCongressionally-designated “High Priority Corridor”Lack of a continuous parallel route with direct connection to I-10 during major accidents or incidentsExisting facility not meeting current design standardsVehicle-train conflictsTo meet the project objectives and address the elements of need, the proposed improvements in theRecommended Alternative include:Expanding I-10 to add two travel lanes in both directions between Tangerine Road and Ina Road(ten-lane freeway) with a closed median (concrete median barrier)Lowering the I-10 profile at Avra Valley Road and Cortaro RoadParallel entrance and exit ramps in both directions on I-10 at all traffic interchangesEX-1February 2014

Final Design Concept ReportI-10 Corridor Study, Tangerine Road to Ina Road Figure EX.1 – Project Location MapFigure EX.2 – Vicinity MapEX-2February 2014

Final Design Concept ReportI-10 Corridor Study, Tangerine Road to Ina Roaddirections on I-10 at all interchanges. Portions of the eastbound entrance ramp and westbound exit rampfor the new Tangerine Road TI and the entrance and exit ramps at the Twin Peaks Road TI would bereconstructed.EX.2 DESIGN CONCEPT ALTERNATIVESThe design concept alternative development and evaluation process was divided into three categories asfollows:The continuous one-way frontage roads would generally be parallel to the I-10 mainline and would connectto the ramps near the traffic interchanges. The frontage roads would contain two 12-foot

I-10 Corridor Study, Tangerine Road to Ina Road EX-1 February 2014 EX.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Final Design Concept Report (DCR) describes the development, evaluation and recommendation of improvements to increase the capacity of Interstate 10 (I-10) between Tangerine Road (approximate

Related Documents:

Texts of Wow Rosh Hashana II 5780 - Congregation Shearith Israel, Atlanta Georgia Wow ׳ג ׳א:׳א תישארב (א) ׃ץרֶָֽאָּהָּ תאֵֵ֥וְּ םִימִַׁ֖שַָּה תאֵֵ֥ םיקִִ֑לֹאֱ ארָָּ֣ Îָּ תישִִׁ֖ארֵ Îְּ(ב) חַורְָּ֣ו ם

Final Exam Answers just a click away ECO 372 Final Exam ECO 561 Final Exam FIN 571 Final Exam FIN 571 Connect Problems FIN 575 Final Exam LAW 421 Final Exam ACC 291 Final Exam . LDR 531 Final Exam MKT 571 Final Exam QNT 561 Final Exam OPS 571

ART 224 01 05/01 04:00 PM AAH 208 ART 231 01 05/02 04:00 PM AAH 138 . Spring 2019 Final Exam Schedule . BIOL 460 01 No Final BIOL 460 02 No Final BIOL 460 03 No Final BIOL 491 01 No Final BIOL 491 02 No Final BIOL 491 03 No Final BIOL 491 04 No Final .

ME 2110 - Final Contest Timeline and Final Report Preparation March 31, 2014 C.J. Adams Head TA . Agenda 2 Overview of this week Final Contest Timeline Design Review Overview Final Report Overview Final Presentation Overview Q&A . MARCH Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday .

ANTH 330 01 No Final Spring 2020 Final Exam Schedule . ART 221 01 No Final ART 223 01 No Final ART 224 01 05/11 04:00 PM AAH 208 . BIOL 693 01 No Final BIOL 696 01 No Final BLBC 518 01 05/12 04:00 PM CL 213 BLBC 553 01 No Final CEP 215 01 05/12 06:00 PM G303 CEP 215 02 05/11 10:30 AM WH106B .

2 Draft Final Report - addressing KPI comments from meeting DH RR 25/02/2015 3 Final Report - addressing client comments DH RR 27/02/2015 4 Final Report - addressing client group comments DH RR 10/04/2015 5 Final Report - including executive summary in French DH RR 17/04/2015 3rd Floor, Portwall Place, Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB .

Report of the Rector Please refer to Rev‟d Canon Robert Park‟s report in the Annual Report to Vestry. Report of the Assistant Priest Please refer to Rev‟d Nancy Rowe‟s report in the Annual Report to Vestry. Report of the Wardens Please refer to the report by Ian Oldak

Mar 26, 2009 · FINAL EXERCISE REGISTRATION 13 . 9. THESIS and FINAL EXERCISE PRESENTATIONS 24 Presenting the Six-Credit Thesis to the Department Presenting Final Exercise Work in Other Settings APPENDICES 25 Sample Title Page Final Exercise Abstract Guidelines and Sample Abstracts Final Exercise Annotated Biblio