St. Clair Lake Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report -

2y ago
23 Views
2 Downloads
4.78 MB
76 Pages
Last View : 15d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Oscar Steel
Transcription

St. Clair Lake Total MaximumDaily Load (TMDL)Quantification of the phosphorus reductions needed to improve lake water qualityMarch 2016wq-iw5-07e

Authors and Contributors:Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc.:Bruce WilsonMeghan Jacobson, PhDMinnesota Pollution Control Agency:Tim JamesDenise OakesSteven WeissMarco GrazianiPelican River Watershed District:Tera GuetterJon StaldineRichard D. HecockCity of Detroit Lakes:Bob LouiseauVernell RobertsLarry RemmenKurt AshlandScott GilbertsonAcknowledgements:The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) would like to thank the Pelican River WatershedDistrict (PRWD) for sponsoring, funding and managing the St. Clair Lake Total Maximum Daily Load(TMDL) study as a third party TMDL. The district contracted with Emmons & Olivier Resources for theTMDL and Implementation Plan by utilizing their own funding mechanisms.The MPCA approved the third party TMDL work plan and assigned a project manager to ensure that thestudy was consistent with meeting state/federal requirements and expectations. The MPCA providedpeer review of the preliminary draft, submitted it to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) forpreliminary approval, and provided administration for the public notice and final approval process.The MPCA would like to thank the city of Detroit Lakes (City) for being an important partner in the TMDLprocess. The City provided time for its staff, including the Operator of the Waste Water TreatmentFacility and the Manager of the Public Works Department to be integrally involved in the process ofsetting the WLA and the Implementation Plan.2

TMDL Summary TableEPA/MPCA RequiredElementsTMDLPage #SummarySt. Clair Lake Watershed in the Red River of the North Basin inBecker County, Minnesota in the City of Detroit Lakes.Location16Describe the waterbody as it is identified on the State/Tribe’s303(d) list:LAKE NAME303(d) ListingInformationSt. Clair Applicable WaterQuality Standards/Numeric TargetsLAKE IDYEARLISTEDTARGET START/COMPLETION03-0382-0020082012/2015Impaired Use: Aquatic RecreationPollutant or Stressor: Nutrient/Eutrophication BiologicalIndicatorsClass 2B Waters, MN Eutrophication StandardsMinn. R. 7050.0222, subp. 4, North Central Forests EcoregionPARAMETERSHALLOW LAKE STANDARDTotal Phosphorus (µg/l)Chlorophyll-a (µg/l)Secchi Transparency (m)TP 60Chl-a 20SD 1.015lb/yrTotal 214371.197Direct drainage120.033Ditch 11370.375Ditch 141340.368Subtotal2830.7761680.461Long Lake irect drainage140.040Ditch 1700.191Ditch cationsDetroit Lakes MS4Total LALoadAllocations13Unregulated runoffLOADING CAPACITY342

Margin ringImplementationPublicParticipationA 10% explicit margin of safety (MOS) was accounted for in theTMDL. This MOS is sufficient to account for uncertainties inpredicting loads to the lake and predicting how the lake respondsto changes in phosphorus loading.40Critical conditions in these lakes occur in the summer, when TPconcentrations peak and clarity is at its worst. The water qualitystandards are based on growing season averages. The loadreductions are designed so that the lake will meet water qualitystandards over the course of the growing season (JuneSeptember).40Active Local Partners: Pelican River Watershed District, Long LakeAssociation, Local CommunitiesNPDES permit compliance44Monitoring Plan included? yes451. Implementation Strategy included? yes2. Cost estimate included? yes46 Public Comment period January 20 – February 19, 2015 Comments received from Minnesota Department of Agriculture Stakeholder meetings held on October 9, 2012; October 25,2012; April 16, 2013; April 30, 2014; and October 23, 2014. October 25, 2012; April 16, 2013; April 16, 2014; and August 13,2014 meetings were structured specifically for regulatedentities to review calculation methods and receive commentson draft WLAs.449

Table of ContentsExecutive Summary . 1112Project Overview . 131.1Purpose .131.2Identification of Waterbodies .131.3Priority Ranking .13Applicable Water Quality Standards . 152.134Watershed and Waterbody Characterization . 163.1Lakes .163.2Subwatersheds .183.3Land Use .213.4Current/Historic Water Quality .233.5Phosphorus Source Summary .253.5.1Permitted Sources of Phosphorus .253.5.2Non-permitted Sources of Phosphorus .27TMDL Development . 354.15Lake Eutrophication .15Loading Capacity: Lake Response Model .354.1.1System Representation in Model .364.1.2Model Input .364.1.3Loading Goals .394.2Load Allocation Methodology .394.3Wasteload Allocation Methodology .394.3.1Regulated MS4 Stormwater.394.3.2Regulated Construction Stormwater .404.3.3Regulated Industrial Stormwater.404.3.4Regulated Municipal and Industrial Wastewater .404.4Margin of Safety .404.5Seasonal Variation .404.6Future Growth and Reserve Capacity .414.7TMDL Summary .42Reasonable Assurances . 445.1Non-Regulatory .445

5.2678Regulatory .44Monitoring Plan . 456.1Lake Monitoring.456.2BMP Monitoring .45Implementation Strategy . 467.1Regulated Construction Stormwater .467.2Regulated Industrial Stormwater .467.3Adaptive Management .467.4Funding Sources .477.5Prioritization .477.6Education and Outreach .487.7Technical Assistance .487.8Partnerships .497.9Cost .49Stakeholder Participation . 498.1Stakeholder Meetings.498.2Regular Updates .499References . 4910Appendix A – Supporting Data for BATHTUB Model . 5111Appendix B – MPCA 2012 WQBEL Study . 5412Appendix C – Detroit Lakes Annexation Plan . 6713Appendix D – Lake History . 681413.1Lake History, Management, and Uses .6813.2Existing Studies .6813.3Effectiveness of Alum Treatment .69Appendix E – Area Annexation Summary. 716

List of TablesTable 1. Impairment addressed by this report .13Table 2. Lake Eutrophication Standards for Northern Central Hardwood Forest (NCHF) Ecoregion .15Table 3. St. Clair Lake Physical Characteristics .16Table 4. St. Clair Lake Watershed Land Cover .21Table 5. 10-year Growing Season Mean TP, Chl-a, and Secchi for St. Clair Lake, 2002-2011.23Table 6. Municipal Separate Storm Sewers (MS4) .26Table 7. Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Systems .27Table 8. City of Detroit Lakes WWTF Annual Flow and Phosphorus Load .27Table 9. St. Clair Lake direct watershed runoff volume and TP load .29Table 10. St. Clair Lake Watershed hydrologic soil groups (HSGs) .29Table 11. TP Event Mean Concentration (EMC) Values by 2006 NLCD Land Cover Type .29Table 12. Summary of Phosphorus Loading from Upstream Waters .33Table 13. BATHTUB tributary input data .36Table 14. BATHTUB segment and global variable input data .36Table 15. St. Clair Lake TMDL and Allocations .43Table 16. Calibrated (benchmark) BATHTUB model diagnostics (model results) for St. Clair Lake .51Table 17. Calibrated (benchmark) BATHTUB model segment balances (water) for St. Clair Lake .52Table 18. Calibrated (benchmark) BATHTUB model segment balances (phosphorus) for St. Clair Lake .52Table 19. TMDL scenario BATHTUB model diagnostics (model results) for St. Clair Lake .53Table 20. TMDL scenario BATHTUB model segment balances (water) for St. Clair Lake .53Table 21. TMDL scenario BATHTUB model segment balances (phosphorus) for St. Clair Lake .53Table 22. Historic Changes in WWTF Phosphorus Load to St. Clair Lake.70Table 23. Hypothetical Changes to Internal Loading in St. Clair Lake with a Constant Sediment PhosphorusConcentration .717

List of FiguresFigure 1. St. Clair Lake Watershed and its location in Minnesota .14Figure 2. St. Clair Lake 2012 aerial photograph. .16Figure 3. St. Clair Lake spot bathymetry (PRWD 1998) .17Figure 4. St. Clair Lake Watershed city and township boundaries .19Figure 5. Wetland Types of the St. Clair Lake Watershed .20Figure 6. St. Clair Lake Watershed Land Cover .22Figure 7. Growing Season Means SE of Total Phosphorus for St. Clair Lake by Year .24Figure 8. Growing Season Means SE of Chlorophyll-a for St. Clair Lake by Year .24Figure 9. Growing Season Means SE of Secchi Transparency for St.Clair Lake by Year .25Figure 10. St. Clair Lake Watershed MPCA Registered Feedlots & City of Detroit Lakes WWTF .31Figure 11. St. Clair Lake Watershed hydrologic soil groups .32Figure 12. BATHTUB modeled tributaries .38Figure 13. City of Detroit Lakes Short- and Long-term Annexation Areas .678

AbbreviationsBMPbest management practiceBWSRMinnesota Board of Water and Soil ResourcesCAFOConcentrated Animal Feeding OperationCALMConsolidation Assessment and Listing MethodologyChl-aChlorophyll-aCWAClean Water ActCNCurve NumberCVCoefficient of VariationDNRMinnesota Department of Natural ResourcesEMCEvent Mean ConcentrationEOREmmons and Olivier Resources, IncorporatedEPAEnvironmental Protection AgencyGISGeographic Information SystemsGSMGrowing season meanHSGHydrologic Soil GroupITPHSImminent Threat to Public Heath Septic SystemLALoad AllocationLCLoading CapacityMOSMargin of SafetyMPCAMinnesota Pollution Control AgencyMS4Municipal Separate Storm Sewer SystemNCHFNorth Central Hardwood ForestsNLCDNational Land Cover DatasetNPDESNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemNPSNon-point sourcePPhosphorusPRWDPelican River Watershed DistrictPSPoint sourceSecchiSecchi disk transparencySDSState Disposal System9

SEStandard ErrorSLICESustaining Lakes in a Changing EnvironmentSSTSSubsurface Sewage Treatment SystemSWATSoil and Water Assessment ToolSWPPPStormwater Prevention Pollution PlanSWCDSoil and Water Conservation DistrictTMDLTotal Maximum Daily LoadTPTotal PhosphorusUS ACOEUnited States Army Corps of EngineersUSDAUnited States Department of AgricultureUSGSUnited States Geological SurveyWLAWasteload AllocationWQBELWater Quality Based Effluent LimitWRAPWatershed restoration and protection planWWTFWastewater treatment facility10

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study addresses the nutrient impairment of St. Clair Lake,located in Detroit Lakes, Minnesota. St. Clair Lake is 160 acres and receives runoff from 7,380 acres (or11.5 square miles) of land. St. Clair Lake and its watershed are located in Becker County, Minnesota – agrowth region of the State. This lake does not meet Minnesota’s water quality standards due toexcessive nutrient and algal concentrations. Lake St. Clair discharges via County Ditch 14 to MuskratLake and then to Sallie and Melissa Lakes. These lakes have been the subject of extensive city of DetroitLakes and Pelican River Watershed District (PRWD) rehabilitation efforts over the past three decadesthat have resulted in measurable improvements in water quality. However, additional reductions innutrient concentrations are required to fully achieve lake water quality standards and beneficial uses.The nutrient phosphorus (P) is the primary focus of this TMDL. Phosphorus is a necessary nutrient in lakeecology; however, too much P can cause excessive algae blooms, oxygen depletion (loss of oxygen), lowwater clarity and shifts in the types of fish present. These collective impacts can cause lake conditionsthat are not preferred for primary contact recreation (swimming) and lead to a dominance of rough fish(carp and black bullhead) and fish kills. Elevated P concentrations also encourage noxious blue-greenalgae that can form surface scums, have very unpleasant odors and can sometimes be toxic.St. Clair Lake was first listed on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 303(d) Impaired WatersList (or Draft list) in 2008 (see Table 1 for impairment listing). This TMDL report will address theimpairment, provide an assessment of the ecological health of the lake, assess potential P sources, andprovide guidelines on how to restore the aquatic recreational use of the lake. To address all of thepotential nutrient sources and pollutant control methods, TMDLs have been standardized nationally tobe expressed in terms of daily loads such as pounds of P per day, instead of what is more typically seenin PRWD reports as pounds of P per year.Information from multiple sources was used to evaluate the ecological health of St. Clair Lake: In-lake water quality data over the past 10 years, including P and chlorophyll-a(Chl-a ) concentrations, and Secchi transparency In-lake biological characteristics provided by the local community and principal investigators ofprevious studiesThe following P sources were evaluated for St. Clair Lake: watershed runoff, feedlots, wastewatertreatment facilities, loading from upstream lakes, atmospheric deposition, shallow groundwatersources, and internal loading. An inventory of P sources was used as inputs to a lake water qualityresponse model (BATHTUB), and this model was used to determine the P reductions needed for the laketo meet water quality standards. The implementation approach will include: education and outreach;technical assistance; and partnerships with landowners, the city of Detroit Lakes, townships, BeckerCounty, Long Lake Association, and the PRWD. A summary of necessary P reductions is shown in thetable below.LakeSt. loadAllocation(lb /day)LoadAllocation(lb/day)ReductionNeeded (%)2.750.272.020.4624%11

St. Clair Lake Water Quality and Phosphorus Source Summary Long-term growing season mean lake water quality exceeds (violates) the P and Chl-a waterquality standards and just meets the Secchi transparency standard. In 1915, the lake was drained from approximately 600 acres to its current size of 160 acres. The city of Detroit Lakes’ original wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) was constructed in1929. A modern WWTF was constructed in 1976 which significantly reduced P loads to St. ClairLake and downstream water bodies. Unconsolidated lake bottom sediment is as thick as 12 feet in portions of the lake. This, incombination with the lake’s history of receiving sewage prior to modern wastewater treatment,indicates a high potential for internal loading from sediments. The lake was treated with alum infall of 1998, and the suppression of internal P loading is evident in the datasets through 2013. Approximately 16% of the watershed is agricultural, and there is one feedlot in the watershed.Other land uses are comprised of urban (25%), forest (21%), grass and pasture (3% and 16%,respectively), wetlands (11%) and open water (8%). Motor boat access is restricted to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) andPRWD for data gathering purposes. The lake is heavily used by waterfowl. The lake is subject to periodic winterkill and is not supportive of permanent game fishpopulations. The shoreline is predominately cattail. Heavy algae growth is common during the summermonths, which can limit light penetration for a healthy submergent macrophyte population.Wetlands surrounding the lake provide a buffer from adjacent very low density residential andcommercial development.12

1PROJECT OVERVIEW1.1PurposeThis TMDL study addresses the impairment of St. Clair Lake for aquatic recreation use due to excessnutrients (phosphorus). St. Clair Lake is located in the Red River Basin of the North in the city of DetroitLakes, Becker County, Minnesota. The goal of this TMDL is to provide wasteload allocations (WLAs) andload allocations (LAs) and quantify the pollutant reductions needed to meet the state water qualitystandards. This TMDL for P is being established in accordance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act(CWA), because the State of Minnesota has determined that this lake exceeds the state establishedstandards.1.2Identification of WaterbodiesSt. Clair Lake is currently on the EPA 303(d) Impaired Waters List due to excess nutrients (Table 1).Figure 1 illustrates the St. Clair Lake Watershed and its location in Minnesota.The following applies to St. Clair Lake:Impaired Use:Aquatic RecreationPollutant or Stressor:Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological IndicatorsBasin:Red River of the NorthMajor Watershed:Otter Tail River WatershedHydrologic Unit Code:090201030705Table 1. Impairment addressed by this reportLake NameSt. Clair1.3Lake 12/2015Lake ClassificationEPA CALMCategoryShallow Lake5CPriority RankingThe Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) projected schedule for TMDL completions (Table 1),as indicated on the 303(d) impaired waters list, implicitly reflects Minnesota’s priority ranking of thisTMDL. Ranking criteria for scheduling TMDL projects include, but are not limited to: impairment impactson public health and aquatic life; public value of the impaired water resource; likelihood of completingthe TMDL in an expedient manner, including a strong base of existing data and restorability of thewaterbody; technical capability and willingness locally to assist with the TMDL; and appropriatesequencing of TMDLs within a watershed or basin.13

Figure 1. St. Clair Lake Watershed and its location in Minnesota14

2APPLICABLE WATER QUALITY STANDARDSEach stream reach and lake has a Designated Use Classification defined by the MPCA, which defines theoptimal purpose for that waterbody. St. Clair Lake is classified as 2B or 3C water. Class 2 waters areprotected for aquatic life and aquatic recreation by Minn. R. ch. 7050.0140, subp. 3:“Class 2 waters, aquatic life and recreation. Aquatic life and recreation includes allwaters of the state that support or may support fish, other aquatic life, bathing, boating,or other recreational purposes and for which quality control is or may be necessary toprotect aquatic or terrestrial life or their habitats or the public health, safety, orwelfare.”2.1Lake EutrophicationMinnesota’s lake eutrophication standards (Minn. R. 7050.0222, subp. 4) were developed by the MPCA,covering a wide cross-section of lakes and lake types by aquatic ecoregion based on over two decadesof research and associated peer-reviewed publications (Heiskary and Wilson 2005). Clear relationshipswere established between the causal factor (total phosphorus) and the response variables--Chl -a (apigment found in algal cells) and Secchi transparency. Based on these relationships, it is expected thatby meeting the P standard in a lake, the Chl-a and Secchi standards will likewise be met. Totalphosphorus (TP) is often the limiting factor in primary production in freshwater lakes; as in-lake Pconcentrations increase, algal growth increases resulting in higher Chl-a concentrations and lower watertransparency.According to the MPCA’s definition of shallow lakes, a lake is considered shallow if its maximum depth isless than 15 feet, or if the littoral zone (area where depth is less than 15 feet) covers at least 80% of thelake’s surface area. By both of these measures, St. Clair Lake is a shallow lake. St. Clair Lake is locatedwithin the Northern Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion and applicable water quality standards arelisted in Table 2.To be listed as impaired (Minn. R. 7050.0150, subp. 5), the summer growing season (June throughSeptember) monitoring data must show that the standards for both TP (the causal factor) and eitherChl-a or Secchi transparency (the response variables) were violated. If a lake is impaired with respect toonly one of these criteria, it may be placed on a review list; a weight of evidence approach is then usedto determine if it will be listed as impaired. For more details regarding the listing process, see theGuidance Manual for Assessing the Quality of Minnesota Surface Waters for Determination ofImpairment: 305(b) Report and 303(d) List (MPCA 2012a).Table 2. Lake Eutrophication Standards for Northern Central Hardwood Forest (NCHF) EcoregionLake TypeShallow LakesTP (ppb)Chl-a (ppb)Secchi (m) 60 20 1.015

3WATERSHED AND WATERBODY CHARACTERIZATION3.1LakesSt. Clair Lake (DNR Lake ID 03-0382-00) is a shallow lake located in the city of Detroit Lakes in BeckerCounty. Table 3 summarizes the lake’s physical characteristics, Figure 2 shows the 2012 aerialphotography, and Figure 3 illustrates the available bathymetry.Table 3. St. Clair Lake Physical CharacteristicsCharacteristicValueSourceLake total surface area (acre)160Aerial photography (2003, 2006, 2008)Percent lake littoral surface area (%)100PRWD 1998 BathymetryLake volume (acre-feet)784CalculatedMean depth (feet)4.9PRWD 1998 Bathymetry9PRWD 1998 BathymetryMaximum depth (feet)Drainage area (acre)7,380DNR Catchments and city of Detroit LakesStormsewer Drainage LayersWatershed area: Lake area46:1CalculatedFigure 2. St.

This Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study addresses the nutrient impairment of St. Clair Lake, located in Detroit Lakes, Minnesota. St. Clair Lake is 160 acres and receives runoff from 7,380 acres (or 11.5 square miles) of land. St. Clair Lake and its watershed are located in Becker County, Minnesota – a growth region of the State.

Related Documents:

I: Impedance Eduction AA-6. Jet Noise I AA-7. Leading Edge Noise I AA-8. Open Rotors AA-9. Turbomachinery Noise I: Combustion AA-10. Turbulent Boundary Layers ROOM 11:30 - 12:30 12:30 - 14:00 ROOM Saint Clair 3B Rhône 3A Saint Clair 3A Rhône 3B Rhône 2 Saint Clair 4 Aud. Pasteur Rhône 1 Saint Clair 1 Saint Clair 2 14:00 - 16:00 AA-11 .

Jack Carr Bonar Lake . Troy Turley Center Lake . John Bender Diamond Lake . Sandra Buhrt Elizabeth Lake . Chuck Brinkman Irish Lake . Jeff & Pam Thornburgh James, Oswego, & Tippecanoe Lake . Debra Hutnick Palestine Lake . Sandra Buhrt Rachel Lake . Toney Owsley Ridinger Lake .

Lake Michigan Lake Geneva OkaucheeLake Lake Mendota Big Green Lake Chain of Lakes Long Lake (Chippewa Co.) Long Lake (Washburn Co.) Lake Owen Turtle ‐Flambeau Flowage Lake Tomahawk Trout Lake Lake Superior Found in 175 Lakes

Page 1111----2222 Background ST.CLAIR COUNTY TRAIL SYSTEM Bridge to Bay Trail St. Clair County and the Community Foundation of St. Clair County are working in conjunction with 13

Instrumentation: Flute and Piano Style: Romantic Comment: The third and most famous movement of Suite bergamasque is "Clair de lune," meaning "moonlight" in French. Its name . Clair de lune (Moonlight) Fl. Pno 45 45 Fl. Pno 47 47 Fl. Pno 49 49 6 Clair de lune (Moonlight) Fl. Pno 51 51 Tempo I 2 2 2 2 Fl. Pno 55 55 2 Fl. Pno 59

Great Central L Phillips Arm Powell Lake Mahood L Canim L Carpenter Lake Lillooet Lake Harrison Lake Stave Lake Alouette L Pitt Lake Ross Lake . Fish and Wildlife Regional Office (604) 586-4400 200-10428 153 St . ALOUETTE LAKE No vessels in swimming areas, as buoyed and signed; speed restriction (8 km/h) at south end of lake, south of a .

The W, or Michigan shore of Lake St. Clair, has been extensively developed with homes, yacht clubs, and marinas. The communities of Grosse Pointe Park, Grosse Pointe, Grosse Pointe Farms, Grosse Point Shores, and St. Clair Shores, suburban to Detroit, a re on the W lakeshore extending fro

K-5 ELA Missouri Learning Standards: Grade-Level Expectations Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Spring 2016 . Reading 2 1 Develop and apply skills to the reading process. Grade K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 A With assistance, develop and demonstrate reading skills in response to read-alouds by: a. predicting what might happen next in a text based on the .