Pioneer Wind Park Environmental Assessment

2y ago
3 Views
1 Downloads
2.66 MB
41 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Alexia Money
Transcription

U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceFinal Environmental AssessmentFor the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit forPioneer Wind ParkWyomingPrepared by:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mountain-Prairie RegionDivision of Migratory Bird Management134 Union Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado 80228May 2019

Contents1. Introduction . 11.1 Purpose and Need . 21.3 Permit Issuance Criteria . 31.4 Authorities . 41.5 Background . 41.6 Scoping, Consultation and Coordination . 81.6.1 Tribal Coordination . 82. Proposed Action and Alternatives . 102.1 Proposed Action . 102.2 No Action Alternative . 122.3 Other Alternatives Considered but Not Evaluated in this Environmental Assessment . 132.3.1 Alternative 2: Deny Permit . 133. Affected Environment . 133.1 Bald Eagle . 143.1.1 Pre-construction Surveys for Bald Eagles . 143.1.2 Post-construction Surveys for Bald Eagles . 153.2 Golden Eagle . 163.2.1 Pre-construction Surveys for Golden Eagles . 173.2.1.1 Eagle Use Surveys . 173.2.1.2 Nest Surveys . 173.2.1.3 Other Pre-construction Surveys . 183.2.2 Post-construction Surveys . 193.3 Migratory Birds . 203.3.1 Pre-construction Surveys . 203.3.2 Post-construction Surveys . 213.4 Species listed under the Endangered Species Act . 223.5 Cultural and Historical Properties / Tribal Traditional Uses. 233.5 Climate Change . 244. Environmental Consequences . 244.1 Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action . 254.1.1 Estimating Eagle Fatalities . 254.1.1.1 Estimated Bald Eagle Take. 264.1.1.2 Estimated Golden Eagle Take . 264.2 Cumulative Effects of Proposed Action . 274.2.1 Cumulative Effects at the EMU and LAP Scales . 274.2.1.2 Bald Eagles . 284.2.1.3 Golden Eagles . 284.2.1.4 Summary of Cummulative Effects on Bald and Golden Eagles . 294.2.2 Migratory Birds . 29

4.2.3 Cultural and Historic Properties / Tribal Traditional Uses . 304.2.4 Reasonably Foreseeable Future . 314.3 Cumulative Effects of Alternative 1 – No Action . 324.4 Comparison of Effects of Alternatives . 325. Mitigation and Monitoring. 336. List of Preparers . 34References . 35Appendix A. Pioneer Wind Park Eagle Conservation PlanAppendix B. Biological Assessment for the Pioneer Wind Park I Wind Energy FacilityAppendix C. Response to Public Comments

EACPEagle ActECPECP ISProjectRSZServiceSWCAU.S.C.WGFDWTGWWIadvanced conservation practicesAvian Power Line Interaction CommitteePioneer Wind Park I, LLCBiological AssessmentBird and Bat Conservation StrategyBirds of Conservation ConcernBird Conservation RegionCode of Federal RegulationsEnvironmental Assessmentexperimental advanced conservation practicesBald and Golden Eagle Protection ActEagle Conservation PlanEagle Conservation Plan GuidanceEagle Management UnitEndangered Species Act of 1973, as amendedeagle take permitFederal RegisterGeneral ElectricIndustrial Siting Commissionlocal area populationMigratory Bird Treaty Actmeteorological towersMegawatt(s)National Environmental Policy Act of 1969National Historic Preservation ActNational Register of Historic PlacesProgrammatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Eagle Rule RevisionPioneer Wind Parkrotor swept zoneUnited States Fish and Wildlife ServiceSWCA Environmental ConsultantsUnited States CodeWyoming Game and Fish Departmentwind turbine generator(s)Wasatch Wind International, LLC

1. IntroductionThis Environmental Assessment (EA) analyzes the environmental consequences of issuing apermit authorizing the non-purposeful take of bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and goldeneagles (Aquila chrysaetos) at an existing and currently operating wind farm in central Wyoming.The project, the Pioneer Wind Park (Project), is located in Converse County, Wyoming near thetown of Glenrock. This EA is being prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] §§ 4321–4370), its implementing regulations (40 Codeof Federal Regulations [C.F.R] Part 1500), Department of the Interior National EnvironmentalPolicy Act Procedures (43 C.F.R. Part 46) and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)requirements (516 DM 1-4, 8). Issuance of an eagle take permit (ETP) by the Service for nonpurposeful take of eagles, if incidental to otherwise lawful activities, is authorized under the Baldand Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. §§ 668–668d) and its implementingregulations (50 C.F.R § 22.26). Issuance of an ETP constitutes a discretionary Federal actionthat is subject to NEPA. This EA assists the Service in ensuring compliance with NEPA, and inmaking a determination as to whether any “significant” impacts could result from the analyzedactions that would require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). If there areno significant impacts, the agency’s conclusion is documented in a Finding of No SignificantImpact (FONSI). This EA evaluates the effects of the proposed action and a no actionalternative for our decision whether to issue an ETP. The Eagle Act authorizes the Service toissue an ETP only when the take is compatible with the preservation standard of “maintainingstable or increasing breeding populations of bald and golden eagles” 74 FR 46836 (Sep. 11,2009).The applicant, Pioneer Wind Park I, LLC (Applicant), is requesting Eagle Act take coverage foroperational activities associated with the 80 megawatt (MW) wind farm located in ConverseCounty, Wyoming. The Project consists of 46 wind turbines and associated infrastructure (roads,transmission lines, etc.) and has been operational since October 27, 2016; the expected life of theproject is 30 years. Pioneer Wind Park I, LLC, is a wholly owned subsidiary of SustainablePower Group (sPower), which acquired the Project from Wasatch Wind Intermountain, LLC(WWI) in August 2015. Prior to this acquisition, WWI submitted a permit application and EagleConservation Plan (ECP) to the Service on April 22, 2015, requesting a 30-year permit. TheService reviewed the application and requested the Applicant provide additional information.On April 13, 2015, a district court vacated the Service’s decision authorizing 30-year permitterms. Shearwater v. Ashe, No. CV02830-LHK, 2015 WL 4747881 (N. D. Cal. 2015). As aresult of the change of ownership and the rescission of the 30-year permit rule, the Applicantsubmitted a revised application on March 8, 2016, requesting a 5-year permit for the Project.The Applicant has timely elected to continue processing the application under the 20091Final Environmental AssessmentPioneer Wind Park

regulations instead of under the eagle rule revision that took effect on January 17, 2017. Thiselection is specifically authorized by the Service’s regulations at 50 C.F.R. 22.26(i) (see also 81Fed. Reg. 91494, 91537 (Dec. 16, 2016)). As such, this EA evaluates whether issuance of anETP under the 2009 rule will have significant impacts on the existing human environment.“Significance” under NEPA is defined by regulation at 40 C.F.R 1508.27, and requires shortand long-term consideration of both the context of a proposal and its intensity. Pursuant to the“high quality” information standards of the NEPA regulations (40 C.F.R. 1500.1(b), this EA alsoincorporates by reference the best available science, specifically updated population estimatesand other information pertaining to eagles documented in the Bald and Golden Eagles:Population demographics and estimation of sustainable take in the United States, 2016 update(USFWS 2016b) and the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Eagle RuleRevision ( 2016 PEIS, USFWS 2016a). Project-specific information not considered in the 2016PEIS is considered in this EA as described below. Based on this project-specific analysis andapplication of the criteria described below, we have determined that an EA is the appropriatelevel of review.This EA was made available for a 30-day public comment period beginning on September 28,2018 and ending on October 29, 2018. Comments comprised general statements of support oropposition to the Project, comments concerning information that was already included in thedocument, and requests for clarification (see Appendix C for responses to public comments).After evaluating public comments, minor clarifying language was incorporated into this EA.Those clarifications addressed post-construction monitoring, the adaptive management process,and the local area population (LAP) and cumulative effects analysis process. As part of ourpermit process, designed to ensure that the take of bald eagles and golden eagles is still withinestablished take thresholds in the LAP, the Service updated the LAP analysis and associatedcumulative effects analysis to accurately account for any eagle permits that have been issuedbetween the draft EA and this final EA. After public comments were evaluated and the LAP andcumulative effects were updated, the Service has determined that there is no new significantinformation and the Service has prepared a FONSI in accordance with NEPA regulations (40C.F.R § 1508.13).1.1 Purpose and NeedThe purpose of the federal action is to review the permit application package, including the ECP(incorporated herein as Appendix A), which is the foundation of the permit application for theProject. Upon completion of Service’s review of the application package and the associatedNEPA process, the USFWS also is obligated to decide whether or not to issue the ETP [under theEagle Act and the permit issuance criteria at 50 C.F.R. §22.26(f) (Sep. 11, 2009)] to theApplicant for non-purposeful take of eagles associated with the otherwise lawful operation of the2Final Environmental AssessmentPioneer Wind Park

Project and, if so, under what conditions. Another purpose is to evaluate, consistent with 50CFR §22.26(c)(1), the reasonableness of the avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measuresin the ECP to support timely ETP issuance. To issue an ETP, the USFWS must determine thatthe take authorized under the Eagle Act is consistent with the preservation standard.The need for this action is a decision on an ETP application from the Pioneer Wind Park I, LLC.The decision must comply with all applicable regulatory requirements, and be compatible withthe preservation of eagles.1.3 Permit Issuance CriteriaAs described above, this 5-year permit is being processed and evaluated under the Eagle Act’spermitting regulations set forth in the 2009 rule (50 C.F.R § 22.26(f), Sep. 11, 2009). Under theregulations, the Service may not issue a permit unless the following issuance criteria are met:1. The direct and indirect effects of the take and required mitigation, together with thecumulative effects of other permitted take and additional factors affecting eaglepopulations, are compatible with the preservation of bald eagles and golden eagles.2. The taking is necessary to protect a legitimate interest in a particular locality.3. The taking is associated with, but not the purpose of, the activity.4. The taking cannot practicably be avoided; or for programmatic authorizations, thetake is unavoidable.5. The applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to eagles to the maximum extentpracticable, and for programmatic authorizations, the taking will occur despiteapplication of advanced conservation practices 1.6. Issuance of the permit will not preclude issuance of another permit necessary toprotect an interest of higher priority according to the following prioritization order:a. safety emergencies,b. Native American religious use for traditional ceremonies that require eaglesbe taken from the wild,We incorporated adaptive management as part of our consideration of the ETP for the Project because of thechallenges and uncertainties associated with avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating the take of eagles. Therefore, wehave proposed an adaptive management framework by which avoidance and minimization measures and BestManagement Practices, including what the 2009 regulations termed “advanced conservation practices” (ACPs) canbe applied to this Project to address long-term effects. The 2009 regulations defined ACPs as “scientificallysupportable measures that are approved by the USFWS and represent the best available techniques to reduce eagledisturbance and ongoing mortalities to a level where remaining take is unavoidable” (50 C.F.R. 22.3). Because wehave not approved any ACPs for wind energy projects, ACPs issued pursuant to the 2009 regulations areimplemented at wind energy facilities on an experimental basis and are referred to as experimental ACPs.13Final Environmental AssessmentPioneer Wind Park

c. renewal of programmatic take permitsd. non-emergency activities necessary to ensure public health and safety, ande. other interests.The Service addresses these criteria in a decision record (i.e., FONSI) for the permit to be issuedto the Applicant.1.4 AuthoritiesService authorities are codified under multiple statutes that address management andconservation of natural resources from many perspectives, including, but not limited to theeffects of land, water, and energy development on fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats. Thisanalysis is based on the Eagle Act (16 USC 668–668e) and its regulations (50 C.F.R Part 22).The PEIS (Service 2016) has a full list of authorities that apply to this action (PEIS Section 1.6,pages 7–12), which are incorporated herein by reference.1.5 BackgroundThe Applicant is the developer and operator of the Project located in Converse County,Wyoming. The Final Biological Pre-Construction Survey Report for the Pioneer Wind ParkWildlife Study Area (Appendix C of the ECP, Pages 1-6) provides an overview of theenvironmental setting for the Project. In summary, the Project is located in the foothills of theLaramie Mountains, with elevations ranging from approximately 5,500 to 7,600 feet. Thetopography ranges from gently rolling slopes to abrupt canyons and ridges. The Project istypical of Foothill Shrublands and Powder River Basin ecoregions (Chapman et al. 2004),dominated by Foothill Shrubland, sagebrush steppe, and mixed-grass prairies (Figure 1). TheProject is located on approximately 25,268 acres and is located on private land and WyomingState School Trust Lands (of which are approximately 3,107 acres) near the town of Glenrock,Wyoming. There are 46 General Electric (GE) 1.85 megawatt (MW) wind turbine generators(WTGs), all with a tower height of 80 meters and a blade radius of 43.5 meters, with a totaloutput of 80 MW. In addition to the WTGs, other Project facilities include: 10.5 miles of accessroads, a project substation, underground power collection lines linking the WTG to the projectsubstation, approximately 5 miles of 230-kilovolt transmission line connecting the Project to theregional electrical grid, operation and maintenance facilities, one permanent meteorologicaltower (MET), three radar towers, and one communication tower (Figure 2). Construction of theProject commenced in February 2016 and operations began on October 27, 2016. Postconstruction monitoring for eagles and other raptors began on November 1, 2016 and consist ofavian fatality monitoring, avian point count surveys, long-distance raptor surveys, raptor nest4Final Environmental AssessmentPioneer Wind Park

searches, and winter eagle roost surveys (SWCA 2017); results from these surveys aresummarized in the affected environment section below.As a commitment to the protection and conservation of bald and golden eagles, the Applicant hasdeveloped an ECP for the Project (Appendix A, incorporated herein by reference). This Projectspecific ECP was developed in communication with the USFWS and follows the EagleConservation Plan Guidance Module 1: Land-based Wind Energy, Version 2 (ECP Guidance,USFWS 2013a) for successful development and compliance with the Eagle Act. The ECPdocuments how the Project’s siting, design, and planned operation will accomplish avoidanceand minimization of bald and golden eagle take when the take is associated with, but not thepurpose of, an otherwise lawful activity, and cannot practicably be avoided. In the case wherebald eagle or golden eagle take is unavoidable, the ECP outlines the Applicant’s approach toapply experimental advanced conservation practices to reduce such unavoidable take. The ECPfurther details the implementation of compensatory mitigation, necessary to mitigate thepotential take of golden eagles at this Project site.The Applicant has prepared a Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy (BBCS) for the Project (seeAppendix A of the ECP). The purpose of this voluntary, project-specific BBCS is to documentand delineate a program designed to reduce the risk to birds protected under the Migratory BirdTreaty Act (MBTA) and bats as a result of construction and operations of a specific wind energyfacility. The overall goal of the BBCS is to reduce bat and avian mortality to the extentpracticable. The BBCS is separate and distinct from the ECP and ETP. It should be noted thatthe Service provides technical advice to those preparing a BBCS, but does not approve the plans.The MBTA does not authorize permits for the incidental take of migratory birds.5Final Environmental AssessmentPioneer Wind Park

Pioneer Wind Park,Converse County, WYSDNEProject BoundaryLULCBarren LandCultivated Crops/000.511Deciduous ForestDeveloped, High IntensityDeveloped, Low IntensityDeveloped, Medium IntensityDeveloped, Open Space1.5mi23kmEmergent WetlandsEvergreen ForestHay/PastureHerbaceousMixed ForestOpen WaterShrub/ScrubWoodyWetlandsData Source: NLCD 2014; World Street MapCoordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13NDate: 9/28/2016

##"#JjkPioneer Wind Park,Converse County, WYSDNEProject BoundaryRock Quarries# TurbineProject Roads") O&M BuildingExisting T-lineSubstation/000.51Interconnection Line11.5mi23kmCollection LineUndergroundPower/FiberMormanCanyon RoadG CommunicationJ Met Tower"j RadarkData Source: NatGeo; World Street MapCoordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13NDate: 9/30/2016

1.6 Scoping, Consultation and CoordinationThis EA incorporates by reference the scoping performed for the PEIS (Chapter 6, page 177).In addition, the applicant worked closely with the Service to avoid, minimize, and mitigateadverse effects on eagles and to develop their ECP in support of its ETP application.The Applicant has communicated with the Service and the Wyoming Game and Fish Department(WGFD) about the Project since 2010. A chronology of agency communication, which includedphone calls, emails, and in-person meetings, is provided in Appendix B of the Applicant’s ECP(Appendix A of this document). Baseline data collection methods were developed with inputfrom the Service and WGFD in 2010.The Wyoming Industrial Siting Council (ISC) issued a permit to the Applicant to construct andoperate the Project in July 2011. As originally permitted by the ISC, the Project was part of alarger proposal which included the Pioneer Wind Park I consisting of 31 GE 1.6-MW windturbine generators (WTGs) for a total nameplate capacity of 49.6 MW and Pioneer Wind Park IIconsisting of 31 GE 1.6 MW WTGs for a total nameplate capacity of 49.6 MW. Combined, theoriginal proposal included 62 WTGs with a total nameplate capacity of approximately 99 MW.The original Project layout included turbines within approximately one mile of eagle nests andnearby historic properties. The layout was revised to avoid historic properties and move turbinesa minimum of 1.9 miles from eagle nests and higher risk areas for all raptors. The Project’sgeneration-tie line was originally located in an area with multiple observations of raptors and inproximity to raptor nests. In an effort to reduce potential impacts to eagles and other raptors, thegeneration-tie line was relocated to an area of minimal suitable habitat and the final turbinelayout was developed to avoid and minimize impacts to eagles and other raptor species. TheApplicant removed the nine proposed turbine locations (those locations considered to pose thehighest potential risk to eagles) from the layout in response to Service comments. The remainderof the turbines were removed for commercially-related reasons. Overall, the Project was reducedfrom 62 WTGs with a nameplate capacity of approximately 99 MW to 46 WTGs with anameplate capacity of 80 MW. Subsequently, the ISC amended the permit on September 23,2015, consolidating Pioneer Wind Park I and Pioneer Wind Park II into a single 46 WTG project,the Pioneer Wind Park. The Service is not aware of any other wind facilities proposed at this siteor within its general proximity.1.6.1 Tribal CoordinationNEPA requires an analysis of project impacts to cultural resources. The PEIS identified tribalcoordination as an important issue for subsequent analysis, given the cultural importance of8Final Environmental AssessmentPioneer Wind Park

eagles to the tribes. In accordance with Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordinationwith Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000), the NHPA Section 106 (36 C.F.R. Part800) and the Service’s Native American Policy, we consult with Native American tribalgovernments whenever we take action under the authority of the Eagle Act that may affect triballands, resources, or the ability to self-govern. The purpose of Executive Order 13175 is toestablish regular and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials in thedevelopment of federal policies that have tribal implications. It also specifies that it is theresponsibility of agencies to strengthen the United States government-to-governmentrelationships with Native American tribes, and to reduce the imposition of unfunded mandatesupon Native American tribes. Our tribal consultations serve to notify the Tribes of the requestedissuance of an ETP. Consultation provides tribes with the opportunity to express tribal views onthe unique, traditional religious and cultural relationship of eagles to Native Americancommunities.The Service currently manages both bald and golden eagles at the Eagle Management Unit(EMU), which is defined, with some modifications, by the four administrative flyways. ThisProject occurs in the Central Flyway. At the time the application was received, the Servicemanaged golden eagle populations at the Bird Conservation Region (BCR) level for goldeneagles, and multi-state level for bald eagles. We contacted seventy-four (74) sovereign nationsthrough formal letters to offer the opportunity for formal consultation concerning this potentialfederal action. Sovereign nations located in the Northern Rockies, Southern Rockies/ColoradoPlateau, Badlands and Prairies, and Shortgrass Prairie BCRs received these letters. The firstletter informed them of the anticipated receipt of the ETP application and preparation of this EA,the second letter announced the public availability of the EA and the 30-day public commentperiod, and the third letter will announce the final EA and FONSI. To date, three tribes haveresponded, each requesting additional information and the Service responded accordingly. OnApril 16, 2015 the Service consulted with the Santa Clara Pueblo about the Project. Discussionwith the tribe included an overview of eagle take permitting rules, the project overview, eaglesurveys, eagle fatality monitoring, conservation measures, mitigation and adaptive management.On November 15, 2018, the Service responded to a letter received from the Southern Ute Tribe,which was requesting more information about impacts from wind farms to eagles. The Servicehas not received additional correspondence from the Southern Ute Tribe. The NorthernCheyenne Tribe responded during the public comment period, requesting more informationabout migratory eagles. On December 10, 2018 the Service responded to this request via atelephone conversation with Jason Whiteman, of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe. Coordinationwith tribal governments is an ongoing process. If the Service issues a 5-year ETP to theApplicant and the Applicant chooses to apply for a new permit when the ETP expires, tribes willagain be notified and offered the opportunity for consultation.9Final Environmental AssessmentPioneer Wind Park

2. Proposed Action and Alternatives2.1 Proposed ActionWe propose to issue a 5-year permit to take up to one bald eagle and up to five golden eagleswith associated conditions, as allowed by regulation. The ETP would require theimplementation of best management practices (BMPs), conservation actions, and experimentaladvanced conservation practices that the Applicant has agreed to in the ECP. These includeAvoidance and Minimization, Compensatory Mitigation, Post Construction Monitoring, andAdaptive Management. As specific details are provided in the ECP (Appendix A), this EAsummarizes each practice and includes additional specificity, if necessary.Avoidance and Minimization Measures (ECP Section 4) - The Applicant has completed orcommitted to complete the following: Pre-construction siting and project layout – The Project was reduced from 62 to 46WTGs to avoid and minimize impacts to eagles and other raptor species. The Applicant,working with the Service, considered the following factors when evaluating relative riskof the proposed turbine locations: 1) eagle/raptor use surveys that indicated preferred useareas; 2) the location of nest sites; 3) prey base features; 4) topographic uplift features;and 5) areas where avian use point counts revealed relatively more abundance anddiversity of migratory birds. Additional Pre-Construction BMPs and Conservation Measures were implemented at theProject site by the Applicant (ECP Section 4.1.2).Compensatory Mitigation (ECP Section 6) – The Applicant has agreed to develop aCompensatory Mitigation Plan in consultation with the Service to offset predicted golden eagletake as d

This Environmental Assessment (EA) analyzes the environmental consequences of issuing a permit authorizing the non-purposeful take of bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) at an existing and currently operating wind farm in central Wyoming.The project, the Pioneer Wind Park (Project), is located in Converse County, Wyoming near the

Related Documents:

Pioneer 32T22 21.6 41.50 Pioneer 31G97 19.3 40.00 Pioneer 33B54 16.7 41.00 Dyna-Gro 57F87 17.4 39.40 Grand Valley Hybrid X0125 16.8 38.10 Pioneer 33R78 18.9 41.90 Pioneer 31B13 20.7 38.30 Pioneer 31N28 21.7 40.80 Pioneer 32P76 20.2 39.80 Pioneer Pioneer 32P76 32P76 17.8 43.70 22.0 42.50

red wind/red wind xlr h50 t-15m l 35 mm red wind/red wind xlr h80 t-16m l 65 mm red wind/red wind xlr h105 t-17m l 90 mm racing speed xlr h80 t-19m l 74 mm profile rim female valve adapter (option) red wind/red wind xlr h50 t-15f l 37 mm red wind/red wind xlr h80 t-16f l 67 mm red wind/red wind xlr h105 t-17f l 92 mm racing speed .

2 stk. Technics SL-1210 mk.2 m. pick-up 1 stk. Pioneer DJM-800 720 900 1080 1350 2 stk. Technics SL-1210 mk.2 m. pick-up 1 stk. Pioneer DJM-350 440 550 660 825 2 stk. Pioneer CDJ-350 1 stk. Pioneer DJM-750 mk.2 680 850 1020 1275 2 stk. Pioneer CDJ-2000 nxs 1 stk. Pioneer DJM-800 720 900 1080 1350 2 stk. Pioneer CDJ-2000 nxs

DTU Wind Energy E-0174 5 1 0BIntroduction Wind resource assessment is the process of estimating the wind resource or wind power potential at one or several sites, or over an area. One common and well-known result of the assessment could be a wind resource map, see Figure 1. Figure 1. Wind resource map for Serra Santa Luzia region in Northern .

CIVIC CENTER NORTH AVENUE OAKLAND CITY KING MEMORIAL GEORGIA STATE LINDBERGH CENTER PEACHTREE CENTER EDGEWOOD-CANDLER PARK INMAN PARK-REYNOLDSTOWN 400 85 Piedmont Park Orme Park Freedom Park Freedom Park Freedom Park Candler Park Freedom Park Springdale Park Virgilee Park Oak Grove Park Bass Recreation Center SpringvalePark Lang

Wind power: social concerns Wind, solar and biofuels. Technologies in the wind chain 2017-09-26 Wind, solar and biofuels 10 On-shore wind Off-shore wind. 2017-09-26 Wind, solar and biofuels 11 Sample Reference Energy System Oil Gas Coal Gasification Import / Production of biomass Uranium enrichment

Amusement Park ? 24. What is the Sensitivity Analysis-Price/Volume of Water Park, Amusement Park ? 25. What are the Projected Pay-Back Period and IRR of Water Park, Amusement Park ? 26. What is the Process Flow Sheet Diagram Water Park, Amusement Park project? 27. What are the Market Opportunities for setting up Water Park, Amusement Park ?

Introduction to the Japanese Writing System Historical background of Kanji In the 5th century Japanese buddhist monks brought Chinese texts written in Chinese language to Japan. Since the Japanese language itself had no written form at that time, the Chinese characters (so-called Kanji or 漢字) were adapted. At that time the original texts .