Environmental Review Binder Documentation

2y ago
12 Views
3 Downloads
4.20 MB
26 Pages
Last View : 15d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Adalynn Cowell
Transcription

Environmental Review Binder DocumentationMcGilchrist Street SE: 12th Street SE to 25th Street SE ProjectCity of Salem, Marion County, OregonUpdated Project Information(as of August 11, 2017)STIP Project Name: McGilchrist St SE: 12th St SE to 25th St SE (Salem)City of Salem, Marion County, OregonODOT Region #2, Key #20739Federal Aid Number: Pending

Technical Memorandum700 Washington StreetSuite 401Vancouver, WA 98660Phone (360) 737-9613Fax (360) 737-9651To:Aaron Kimsey, City of SalemFrom:Ken AckermanPrepared By:Ryan Makie and Morgan HainesCopies:Tom Walsh, Tim Kraft, Electronic FileDate:2/20/2017Subject:McGilchrist Street SE Corridor Improvement –Surface Water Permit Support MemorandumOtak Project No.:17479Project BackgroundThis project will improve the existing McGilchrist Street SE roadway corridor in Salem, Oregonbetween 12th Street SE and 25th Street SE. The project proposes to widen McGilchrist Street SE,provide pedestrian improvements, and realign the intersection at 22nd Street SE. The project is locatedin a predominantly industrial area and is adjacent to Salem Municipal Airport (McNary Field). Withinthe project area, the roadway crosses three streams (Clark Creek, West Fork of Pringle Creek and EastFork of Pringle Creek) and the existing Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks. Additionally, drainagefrom work areas on 25th Street SE discharges to an unnamed ditch that flows west to Pringle Creek.Figure 1 is a project area map.The project components related to surface water include the key elements listed below. Relocation of existing stormwater collection and conveyance systems components Construction of new green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) facilities Replacement of existing undersized culverts at West Fork Pringle Creek and East Fork PringleCreek Flow control and runoff treatment meeting City of Salem (City) and Oregon Department ofTransportation (ODOT) requirementsFigures 2 through 5 show the location of the proposed project elements related to surface water.These project components have been designed to meet City, State and Federal requirements asdescribed in the following sections.The purpose of this memorandum is to provide information on the project components related tosurface water to support future project permitting \SWMP Memo.docx

Page 2Figure 1. Project AreaSource: Otak, MP Memo.docx

Page 3Figure 2. Project Site – WestSource: Otak, 2016.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 4Figure 3. Project Site – Middle WestSource: Otak, 2016.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 5Figure 4. Project Site – Middle EastSource: Otak, 2016.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 6Figure 5. Project Site –EastSource: Otak, 2016.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 7Applicable Regulatory RequirementsA number of agencies have jurisdiction over the surface water management of this project. Theseagencies are listed below including what triggers the review authority: City of Salem (City) – Project owner Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) – Federal Project Funding Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) –FAHP lead agency for Oregon National Marine Fisheries (NMFS) –Culvert replacement, Joint Removal/Fill Permit andFederal Funding Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) – Culvert replacement Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) – Work within a regulated floodplain U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) – Work within a regulated water body Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL)– Work within a regulated water bodyThe stormwater design criteria (described in the sections below) were established by comparingregulations associated with federal, state, and local permitting. Each regulatory level has a set ofstandards pertaining to an aspect of the proposed stormwater design. The following lists publicationsfrom each applicable regulatory authority that were used to inform the design:City of Salem Salem Revised Code, Chapter 71 – Stormwater City of Salem, Department of Public Works, Administrative Rules, Chapter 109 Division 004 –Stormwater System City of Salem, Department of Public Works, Standard Drawings, No. 100-299 – Sewers and Drains NPDES MS4 Discharge Permit December 30, 2010Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) ODOT Highway Division, Hydraulics Design Manual, 2014 ODOT Water Resources Specialist Manual ODOT Erosion Control Manual, 2005Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) ODFW Oregon Administrative Rules 635-412-0005Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) FAHP Programmatic User’s Guide, Version 4: June 2016National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (Slopes V Stormwater,Transportation, and Utilities), 2014 Anadromous Salmonid Passage Facility Design, P Memo.docx

Page 8The proposed stormwater management design must meet design standards from all five authorities. Inthe case where conflicts between the three sets of requirements arise, the most restrictive will beapplied to the project. Table 1 provides a simplified illustration of which authority’s regulations governfor each project design aspect covered in this section.Table 1. Applicability of Regulatory AuthorityCity ofSalemDesignODOTConveyanceGSIWater QualityFlow ControlCulvertsNAODFWFAHPNMFSNANANANAPrimary governing regulatory authoritySecondary governing regulatory authorityRegulations superseded/deferredNot applicable to projectExisting ConditionsGeotechnical and Groundwater DataThe site is located within the Pringle Creek watershed. The existing soils generally consist of a silt/claylayer ranging from 0-12 feet below ground surface (BGS) over a dense gravel layer. The site soils arecategorized in the hydrologic soil groups C/D and D, which correspond with very slow infiltrationrates. Figure 6 is a soils map of the project area.The geotechnical investigation was completed by GeoDesign in September 2016. Groundwater wasnot encountered at the time of the explorations. GeoDesign estimates that seasonally highgroundwater could be as close as 4 feet BGS in some locations.The proposed project area is not located within a Groundwater Management Area, as indicated by theDEQ at gwmas.pdf.Stormwater ManagementExisting runoff is collected by catch basins and roadside ditches that discharge to Clark Creek, WestFork of Pringle Creek, East Fork Pringle Creek, the main stem of Pringle Creek, or the unnamed ditchthat crosses 25th Street SE just north of McGilchrist Street SE. There are not any existing stormwaterquality or flow control facilities within the project area.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 9Figure 6. Soils MapNote: AOI Area of InterestSource: NRCS, MP Memo.docx

Page 10FloodplainsThe project is within the Pringle Creek Basin. The overall topography of the area generally slopes fromsoutheast to northwest draining towards the Willamette River. Three creeks cross under the roadwaywithin the project limits: Clark Creek, a tributary of Pringle Creek; West Fork Pringle Creek; and EastFork Pringle Creek.The Clark Creek crossing consists of a 60-inch concrete culvert and the West Fork of Pringle Creekculvert consists of a corrugated metal pipe arch with a 92-inch span and 65-inch rise. The East Fork ofPringle Creek crossing consists of a box culvert 8-foot wide by 4-feet tall. The West and East Fork ofPringle Creek crossing structures are too short to accommodate the widened roadway and will bewidened and upgraded to meet current environmental permitting requirements. The Clark Creekcrossing structure does not need to be widened and will remain as is.The crossing at the West Fork of Pringle Creek is significantly undersized and frequent roadwayovertopping occurs in this location. City Operations staff reported that nuisance flooding has not beenan issue at the other two crossings.A regulatory floodway (area subject to 100 year flood) exists between approximately the Union PacificRailroad (UPRR) right-of-way near Pringle Road SE and 22nd Street SE. Floodwater flows fromsoutheast to northwest, primarily through the East Fork Pringle Creek and West Fork Pringle Creekfloodway, as seen in Figure 7. The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 41047C0342Hshows the Project is within areas zoned AE and AO, which can experience shallow flooding annually.The stretch of McGilchrist Street SE between the railroad and 22nd Street SE is relatively flat, onlyvarying within one foot.The scope of the McGilchrist Street SE Corridor Improvements Project is not intended to, nor wouldit be able to, address regional flooding issues caused by major floods. The Project will, to the extentfeasible, attempt to improve roadway passage issues caused by annual nuisance flooding. Two culvertscrossings at East Fork Pringle Creek and West Fork Pringle Creek will be replaced as part of theproject. The likely effect of the culvert replacements will be to lower upstream flood elevations andpossibly increase downstream flood elevations.The City is currently working on developing a surface water master plan as a separate project. Themaster plan will identify capital improvement projects (CIPs) that will work to alleviate existing regionalflooding problems. This project and the master plan project will continue to be well-coordinated sothat future flooding conditions can be identified and problems addressed through new MP Memo.docx

Page 11Figure 7. FEMA Flood Hazard Area MapSource: FEMA, MP Memo.docx

Page 12Status of the Receiving WatersClark CreekClark Creek approaches the project area from the southwest before turning north and crossingMcGilchrist Street immediately west of Pringle Road. Clark Creek then turns abruptly to the westwhere it passes beneath 12th Street, then turns northward again to its confluence with Pringle Creekapproximately 3,500 feet from the McGilchrist Street crossing.The City of Salem Fish Passage Survey indicates there are five culverts on Clark Creek downstream ofMcGilchrist Street SE, which are fish passage barriers. The survey also shows a dam or weir structurelocated approximately 2,500 feet downstream of the McGilchrist Street crossing. Each of thesestructures is identified as a passage barrier for both juvenile and adult fish. The survey also indicatesthat a 1,500-foot reach of Clark Creek extending upstream from its confluence with Pringle Creek iscontained in an underground pipe.West and East Fork Pringle CreekWest Fork Pringle Creek approaches McGilchrist Street from the south before passing beneathMcGilchrist just east of the UPRR tracks. The West Fork then flows north along the tracks to itsconfluence with the East Fork of Pringle Creek at Oxford Street about 1,800 feet north of McGilchristStreet.East Fork Pringle Creek approaches McGilchrist Street from the south before passing beneathMcGilchrist west of 22nd Street and turning westward toward Walling Pond. The East Fork is thenshown flowing from the northern limit of Walling Pond to its confluence with the West Fork ofPringle Creek at Oxford Street about 1,800 feet north of McGilchrist Street.The City of Salem Fish Passage Survey indicates there is a dam or weir structure located approximatelytwo miles northwest of the McGilchrist Street crossing near the confluence of Pringle Creek with theWillamette River. This structure is identified in the survey as a passage barrier for juvenile fish.Fish PresenceAs described in the project baseline report, Clark Creek, East Fork Pringle Creek, and West ForkPringle Creek are known to contain native and non-native fish species including ESA-listed species(Coho, Chinook salmon, and steelhead). The existing habitat conditions for the streams are low tomoderate (Otak, 2016)ODFW in-water work guidelines restrict in-water work in the three streams to the period between June1 and October 15.V:\PROJECT\17500\17581\ProjectDocs\Permits\SWMP Memo.docx

Page 13Oregon DEQ 303(d) listClark Creek in the Middle Willamette watershed is documented to have the following water qualitylimitations: arsenic, biological criteria, dissolved oxygen, E. coli, dieldrin, pH, and temperature.Pringle Creek in the Middle Willamette watershed is documented to have the following water qualitylimitations: Aldrin, alkalinity, atrazine, bromacil, chlordane, chlorinated benzenes, chlorophenoxyherbicides, chlophrifos, chromium, copper, DDT, desethylatrazine, diazinon, dieldrin, dissolvedoxygen, endosulfan, endrin, guthion, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorocyclohexane, lead,malathion, mercury, methoxychlor, metolachhlor, metribuzin, nickel, p.p. ODD, parathion, PCB,prometon, simazine, tebuthiuron, toxaphene, triclopyr, trifluralin, zinc, and habitat modification, EColi, pH, and temperature.Oregon’s 2012 Integrated Report Assessment Database and 303(d) list is available 2/search.aspPollutants of ConcernStormwater runoff from roadways subject to vehicle traffic may carry a variety of pollutants. DEQ’sStormwater Management Plan (SWMP) Submission Guidelines identify the following categories ofpollutants associated with roadway projects: Metals (zinc, copper, lead, etc.)Oil, Grease and Other PetroleumSedimentPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)The proposed stormwater management approach will use GSI (designed according to City, State, andFederal requirements) to treat site runoff. This stormwater management approach is an industryaccepted best management practice (BMP) for managing stormwater runoff from roadways, whererunoff is infiltrated and pollutants of concern are filtered out and broken down by bacteria in the soil.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 14Proposed Stormwater Management PlanWidening and sidewalk improvements will occur along the entire length of McGilchrist Street SE (5300feet), and the following approximate lengths of all side streets: 50 feet of 13th Street SE 470 feet of Pringle Street SE 50 feet of 16th Street SE 50 feet of 19th Street SE 800 feet of 22nd Street SE 80 feet of 23rd Street SE 30 feet of Ford Street SE 1000 feet of 25th Street SEImpervious surface within the project limits is considered onsite impervious area and will be treated aspart of this project. Public roadways that drain towards McGilchrist Street SE are considered offsiteimpervious area and must also be treated as a part of this project. Offsite impervious area includesportions of 13th Street SE, 19th Street SE, Ford Street SE, and 25th Street SE. Table 2 shows theexisting and new impervious areas to be managed as part of this project.Table 2. CIA and Impervious Surface Area (ISA)Impervious AreaExisting (acres)Onsite10.16Offsite0.71Total10.87Proposed (acres)12.410.7113.12Increase (acres)2.2602.26Runoff from the proposed onsite and offsite impervious surfaces will be managed using GSIstormwater facilities sized in accordance with City, State, and Federal requirements using themethodologies and design criteria listed below.Stormwater Facility DesignThe proposed stormwater facilities were designed according to the most restrictive of City of Salem,ODOT/FAHP, and NMFS runoff treatment requirements as listed below. GSI Requirements (City): Use GSI to the maximum extent feasible (MEF). GSI facilities canbe partial infiltration when infiltration rates are less than 0.5 inches per hour.Water Quality Requirements (City): Provide pollution reduction for the water quality stormof 1.38 inches of rainfall in 24-hours.Flow Control Requirements (ODOT/FAHP, NMFS): Limit post-developed peakdischarge to pre-developed peak discharge for the 42% of the 2-year to 10-year storm events.Conveyance Requirements (City): Conveyance system to be designed to carry the 50-yeardesign storm flowing full.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 15The project site was divided into 41 drainage subbasins. Water quality and flow control requirementswill be met using a variety of GSI partial infiltration facilities (planters, rain gardens, vegetated swales)to the maximum extent feasible (MEF). StormFilter treatment cartridges with MetalRx media will beused where GSI is infeasible.Existing drainage patterns will be maintained, and under proposed conditions, individual site subbasinswill continue to discharge to the same surface water. Existing storm outfalls that connect to either ofthe two culverts to be replaced will be reconstructed and will discharge through the wing walls of theproposed culverts.All of the proposed stormwater facilities will provide water quality treatment according to Cityrequirements. The City water quality requirements are the most restrictive. The City water qualityevent of 1.38 inches in 24-hours results in a higher peak discharge than the ODOT/FAHP and NMFSwater quality event of 50% of the 2-year.Proposed facilities that drain directly to the West and East Forks of Pringle Creek will be exempt fromflow control requirements. This area is exempt from providing flood control because it experiencesexisting flooding from Pringle Creek that impacts the road during 2-year and 10-year events.Stormwater flow control facilities in these locations would be ineffective due to surface water levelsbackwatering the stormwater facilities during storm events that are much more frequent than thedesign event. Increasing the elevation of the roadway surface would effectively create a levee thatwould increase flooding of private property in upstream areas. The flooding issues in this area will beaddressed though regional CIP projects identified through the surface water master planning projectdescribed earlier. The project challenges related to flow control were discussed in a project meeting onNovember 18, 2016. The meeting notes, which include design decisions related to flow control, are inAppendix A.Stormwater facilities that drain to Clark Creek and the unnamed ditch that crosses 25th Street SE will berequired to provide flow control. ODOT/FAHP and NMFS flow control requirements are identicaland are more restrictive than City requirements. Facilities that require flow control will limit the postdeveloped peak discharge to the pre-developed peak discharge for the 42% of the 2-year to 10-yearstorm events.Using knowledge of infiltration testing completed for other projects in the area and professionaljudgement based on what is known about site soils, we have estimated a design infiltration rate of 0.2inches per hour to complete the design of the GSI partial infiltration facilities.The following are additional design criteria for the stormwater system. The project GSI facilities will be categorized as partial infiltration facilities due to the low designinfiltration rate of 0.2 inches per hour, which is less than the 0.5 inches per hour threshold.Partial infiltration facilities will have a perforated pipe underdrain running the length of the facility.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 16The list below gives a general description of the various GSI facilities proposed for the project. Thesefacilities have been designed to meet City requirements for these types of facilities. Planters – Primarily located between the curb and the sidewalk where possible; otherwise,stormwater planters will be located behind the sidewalk and a trench grate and channel willconvey stormwater under the sidewalk into each facility. The planters will be approximately 24inches deep and will require short concrete walls bordering the facility. The planters on theproject only provide water quality treatment. No runoff will discharge from the facilities duringthe water quality design storm.Rain Gardens – Located at the back of sidewalk and when possible a trench grate and channelwill convey runoff into the facility. In some cases a stormwater pipe will day light into thefacility. Rain Gardens will be approximately 4 feet deep with 3 to 1 side slopes. Where space islimited a short approximately 2 foot retaining wall will be provided. The rain gardens willprovide both water quality treatment and flow control. Discharge will be limited by anoverflow stand pipe and perforated underdrain. Runoff that cannot discharge will be storedwithin the facility.Vegetated Swale – The vegetated swale will be located between the back of walk on 22ndStreet SE and discharge to East Fork Pringle Creek. The swale will have a 6-foot bottomwidth, be approximately 4 feet deep with side slopes that range from 2:1 to 1.5:1. The swale willonly provide water quality treatment. The swale will be a minimum of 100 feet long with aminimum residence time of 9 minutes.Conveyance DesignThe stormwater conveyance system has been designed to, at a minimum, maintain the existing capacity.In areas where additional impervious area will discharge to an existing stormwater pipe that is currentlyat capacity, the existing pipe will be replaced with a new pipe that is a larger diameter.City stormwater conveyance requirements state that arterial roadway stormwater pipes should be ableto carry the 50-year peak runoff flow rate flowing full. Due to the limited elevation change between thewater surface elevations in the creeks and the roadway pavement, certain areas of the stormwaterconveyance system will operate in a surcharged condition for events more frequent than the 10-yearevent. The existing stormwater system operates under these same conditions.The following are additional design criteria for the stormwater conveyance system. Corrugated high-density polyethylene (or similar approved material) used for storm drain pipeswith cover of 30-inches or greater. Ductile iron pipe used for storm drain pipes where any length of the individual pipe run had lessthan 30-inches of cover. All pipe between structures to be of the same material. Flow rates calculated for offsite tributary areas represent existing conditions only. It was assumedthat new developments will provide detention to match the existing runoff hydrology.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 17Stream Crossing DesignsMcGilchrist Street SE crosses three streams within the project area: Clark Creek, West Fork of PringleCreek, and the East Fork of Pringle Creek. The project will construct a cantilevered sidewalk overClark Creek and will not include any work on the existing culvert. The culverts at the West and EastForks of Pringle Creek will both be replaced with larger structures.A site meeting was held on March 25, 2016 to review project elements with the ODOT’s FAHP andNMFS liaison and the project team. During that meeting, the active channel widths (ACW) wereagreed upon and approaches related to stream crossing widths were identified. The notes from thismeeting are included in Appendix A. The typical regulatory requirement for the span of the twoproject stream crossings is 1.5 times ACW. As detailed in the meeting notes, the project teamdiscussed that a shorter spans would be permissible for this project due to existing site constraints. West Fork Pringle Creek Structure – The West Fork Pringle Creek structure will be astructural plate pipe arch with a span of 16 feet. The ACW of the creek is 14.3 feet. East Fork Pringle Creek Structure – The East Fork Pringle Creek structure will be aconcrete box culvert with a span of 20 feet. The ACW is 18.9, which is considered to beconservative by the project team.Culvert design criteria were established with the ODFW and NMFS as the primary governingauthorities. Stream simulation design methodology will be used, in which culverts replacements mustbe designed to allow fish passage, sediment transport, and debris conveyance.The culvert design criteria are summarized below: The minimum flow depth should be the same as the adjacent stream.The culvert slope should match that of the adjacent stream.The structure should be imbedded by 20 percent of the structure’s height or a minimum of 12inches.The stream bed material should mimic that of the natural channel with partially buried over-sizedrock included in the crossing if the structure is greater than 40 feet in length.No increase in upstream water surface elevations during the 25-year storm event.The steam bed materials should mimic that of the natural channel with partially buried oversizedrock included in the crossing if the structure is greater than 40 feet in length.The culvert replacements are intended to accommodate the proposed ultimate width roadwayimprovement.Upstream and downstream channel areas for both culverts will be restored using bioengineeringtechniques including native vegetation.The replacement culverts are not intended to mitigate flooding issues in the area. Analysis ofdownstream impacts related to the culverts replacement will not be performed as part of this project.V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 18The Salem Stormwater Master Plan Update project will address flooding in the Pringle CreekWatershed which includes the project area.References and BibliographyCity of Salem Department of Public Works, Administrative Rules Design Standards, Chapter 109Division 004 - Stormwater System. January Works/PW%20Administrative%20Rules/adminrule 109-001 109-007.pdfCity of Salem Department of Public Works, Standard Drawings No. 100-299 - Sewers and Drains.January Works/Engineering/EngDocuments/sp 200 storm.pdfFederal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) Programmatic User’s Guide, Version 4: June AL/docs/Biology/FAHPESA/FAHP UsersGuideUpdate Final 2016.pdfFederal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel41047C0342H. January 2nd, ry Salem%20ORegon#searchresultsanchorGeoDesign, Inc. Draft Report of Geotechnical Services. McGilchrist Street SE CorridorImprovements. September 22nd, 2016.National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Northwest Region. Anadromous Salmonid PassageFacility Design. July cations/hydropower/fish passage design criteria.pdfNational Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Northwest Region. Revised Standard Local OperatingProcedure for Endangered Species (Slopes V Stormwater, Transportation, and Utilities). March14th, 2014. ckable/NWR-201310411?overrideUserGroup PUBLIC&referer on%3dSESSION SEARCHOregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 1998 303(d) 98.htmOregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Section 401 Water Quality ce Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 19Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan Submission Guidelines. May /stormwaterGuidelines.pdfOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Oregon Administrative Rules 635-412-0005.Division 412 - Fish Passage. December 29th, 2016. http://www.dfw.state.or.us/OARs/412.pdfOregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Highway Division, Hydraulics Manual.August 1st, TAL/pages/hyd manual info.aspx#Hydraulics ManualOtak, Inc. et.al. Draft Environmental Baseline Conditions Technical Report, McGilchrist Street SE:12th Street SE to 25th Street SE. April 2016.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2012). Web Soil Survey ofClark County, Washington. e.htmV:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Page 20Appendix AProject Meeting Notes:March 25, 2016November 18, 2016V:\PROJECT\17400\17479\Reports\Surface Water Permit Support Memo\SW Permit Memo REV02-19-17.docx

Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc.707 S.W. Washington Street, Suite 1300Portland, OR 97205-3530MEMORANDUMDATE:March 25, 2016TO:Donna Hinze (ODOT)CC:Aaron Kimsey (City of Salem) and Lynda Wannamaker (WannamakerConsulting)FROM:Daniel Covington (MB&G), Tom Walsh (Walsh Consulting Group), and KenAckerman (Otak)SUBJECT: Notes from the on-site FAHP visit for the McGilchrist St. SE: 12th St. SE to 25thSt. SE Corridor Improvements Project in Salem, OregonProject Summary:The purpose of the McGilchrist St. SE: 12th St. to SE to 25th St. SE Corridor ImprovementProject (project) is to reduce congestion by adding a center turn lane, bike lanes, and sidewalksthe length of the project. The project includes a realignment of 22nd St. SE to a single intersectionwith McGilchrist St. The project also includes improvements to intersecting streets, particularlyPringle Road SE and 25th Street SE widenings to accommodate additional lanes. The project willalso entail stormwater conveyance and treatment and replacement stream culverts. Clark Creek,East Fork Pringle Creek, and West Fork Pringle Creek are perennial streams that intersect theproject corridor. These streams discharge to Pringle Creek, which then disc

Feb 20, 2017 · ODOT Highway Division, Hydraulics Design Manual, 2014 ODOT Water Resources Specialist Manual ODOT Erosion Control Manual, 2005 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) ODFW Oregon Administrative Rules 635-412-0005 Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP)

Related Documents:

Blood Typing Lab pages 23-29 binder pages 4-6 Fingerprinting Lab pages 30-31 binder page 7 Blood Spatter Lab pages 32-43 binder pages 8-13 Shoe Impressions pages 44- 45 binder page 14 Pathology pages 46-48 binder pages 15-18 ****DNA pages 49-50 binder pages *****must be done last

Listen: Ludwig van Beethoven: Piano Sonata in C minor, op. 13 “Pathetique,” movt. 1 (BINDER: 41) Beethoven: Symphony #1, movt. 1 (BINDER: 45) Early Romantic 9 Beethoven (Middle) Read: BINDER pp. 46 Beethoven: Symphony #5 complete (BINDER: 47-53, and also use IMSLP for a complete score) 10 .

This is your Emergency Binder The majority of the pages are in Word so you can type over, change a list, or add to a table to suit your family circumstances. Find a secure location for your Emergency Binder. Make sure your family knows where it is. During an emergency situation take the binder with you.

Spanish Missals Guitar Accompaniment Book w/ binder (30109559) 53.00 Guitar binder [5-ring, maroon] (30108501) 8.50 Música para la Iglesia de Hoy [9-CD set] (20221) 85.00 Heritage Missal (page 10) Large-Print 4.30 Large-Print with Daily Mass Propers Insert 4.80 Keyboard Accompaniment Book w/ binder (30113977) 68.00 Keyboard binder [5 .

Oct 20, 2020 · 3.0 HOC mailrooms receive case binders for initial endorsement and NOR resubmission processing 4.0 HOC staff review case binder 5.0 HOC staff conduct pre-endorsement review of case binder documents 6.0 HOC s

binder book a4 g.n.s 96 page 1.40 display book a4 20 pocket assort colours 1.40 plastic pocket a4 sheet protectors (pkt 0) 1.20 child development binder book a4 g.n.s 96 page 1.40 digital technology visual arts diary a4 7.00 abacus 16gb flash drive (no returns) 9.50 drama binder book a4 g.n.s 48 page 1.20

(1) Spiral notebook – college ruled at least 100 pages S.Studies Lane (1) 2-pocket folder OR binder (or section for Social Studies in bigger binder) Science Schwartz (1) Spiral notebook (1) Box or package of colored pencils –OR– markers (1) Package of pencils Math Fishback (1) Math Folder or 3-ring binder – with lined paper

Asphalt Terminology Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP): Old asphalt pavement that is incorporated into new asphalt mix. Replacement Binder–recycled asphalt binder from RAS or RAP that is replacing some of the virgin binder in HMA. Performance Grade Asphalt Binderis specified based on performance within a temperature range.