I STRENGTH INVESTIGATION ON RESISTANCE SPOT

2y ago
8 Views
2 Downloads
1.31 MB
24 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Adele Mcdaniel
Transcription

iSTRENGTH INVESTIGATION ON RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING OF LOWCARBON STEEL AND STAINLESS STEELMOHD NUR SYAFFIQ BIN MAHMOODA report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirementsfor the award of the degree ofBachelor of Mechanical EngineeringFaculty of Mechanical EngineeringUNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANGJUNE 2013

viiABSTRACTResistance spot welding (RSW) had been widely used in automotive industry; becauseof their advantages easily to process and low cost, high speed and high production,suitability for automation. About 2000-7000 spot welds were used in joining modernvehicles. This project deals with the investigation of failure mode and mechanicalproperties of weld joint of low galvanized steel and stainless Steel. The main objectiveof this project is strength investigation using RSW of low carbon steel and stainlesssteel. For design of experiment, Taguchi method was employed by using Minitabsoftware, and total nine sets experiment with 3 type of parameter (current, squeeze time,pressure) were conducted. The studies of mechanical properties, are consists of varioustests; Tensile test, Coach Peel test, Hardness test, microstructure to analyze andinvestigate the weldability of galvanized Steel and stainless Steel sheet. Visualinspection was done to determine the failure mode of the spot welding. As a result,tensile test have larger strength variation than the coach-peel test. Wider width anddepth of weld nugget affect the weldability of the welding. Different parameters wereobtained for optimum parameter for tensile test and coach peel test by using Taguchimethod. Almost pullout failure mode occurs where failure at heat affected zone (HAZ)around the nugget circumference.

viiiABSTRAKKimpalan rintangan spot telah digunakan secara meluas dalam industri automotif keranakelebihan mereka mudah untuk di proses dan kos yang rendah, kelajuan yang tinggi danpengeluaran yang banyak, kesesuaian untuk automasi. Lebih kurang 2000-7000kimpalan spot telah digunakan untuk pencantuman kenderaan moden. Projek inimeliputi penyiasatan mod kegagalan dan sifat-sifat mekanik sambungan kimpalan kelulitergalvani rendah dan keluli tahan karat. Objektif utama projek ini adalah siasatankekuatan menggunakan kimpalan rintangan spot kepada keluli karbon rendah dan kelulitahan karat. Bagi procedure eksperimen, kaedah Taguchi telah bekerja denganmenggunakan perisian Minitab, dan jumlah eksperimen sebanyak sembilan set dengan 3jenis parameter (arus, masa tekanan, tekanan) telah dijalankan. Kajian sifat-sifatmekanik, yang terdiri daripada pelbagai ujian iaitu ujian tegangan, ujian pengupasancoach, ujian kekerasan, mikrostruktur untuk menganalisis dan menyiasat kebolehankimpalan kepingan keluli tergalvani dan keluli tahan karat. Pemeriksaan visual telahdijalankan untuk menentukan mod kegagalan kimpalan. Hasilnya, ujian teganganmempunyai kekuatan lebih besar daripada ujian pengupasan ‘Coach’. Keluasan lebardan ke dalam spot kimpalan menjejaskan kebolehan kimpalan. Parameter yang berbezadiperolehi untuk mendapatkan parameter optimum untuk ujian tegangan dan ujianpengupasan coach dengan menggunakan kaedah Taguchi. Kebanyakan mod kegagalanberlaku ialah penarikan di mana kegagalan di zon terjejas haba di lilitan spot kimpalan.

ixTABLE OF CONTENTPageEXAMINER'S DECLARATIONError! Bookmark not defined.SUPERVISOR’S DECLARATIONiiSTUDENT’S iiTABLE OF CONTENTixLIST OF FIGURESxiiLIST OF TABLESxivLIST OF EQUATIONSxvLIST OF ABBREVIATIONSxviCHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.1Research Background11.2Problem Statement21.3Objective21.4Scope Of Research2CHAPTER 2LITERATUREREVIEW2.1Introduction32.2Dissimilar Welding32.3Resistance Welding4

x2.4Principles Of Resistance Spot Welding52.5Spot Welds The Parameters In Resistance Spot WeldingWelding CurrentWeld TimeSqueeze TimeHold Time68101010Material Selection112.6.12.6.21112Galvanized SteelStainless SteelMechanical Test122.7.113CHAPTER 3Failure 3.3Methodology153.4Work Piece And Materials173.4.13.4.21718Preparing Material By Using Shearing MachinePreparing Material For Coach Peel Test3.5Spot Welding Machine203.6Preliminary Testing243.7Tensile-Shear Test263.8Coach Peel Test263.8.126The Tensile Testing3.8Microhardness Test293.9Designing Parameter Of Experiment31

xiCHAPTER 4RESULTS AND DISCUSSION4.1Introduction334.2Tensile Shear Test334.2.14.2.234354.34.4The Tensile Shear Strength GraphsAnalysis Of Taguchi MethodCoach Peel Test414.3.14.3.24143The Coach Peel Strength GraphsAnalysis Of Taguchi MethodConfirmation Experiment484.4.14.4.24850Tensile Shear TestCoach Peel Test4.5Microstructure View514.5Failure Mode534.5.14.5.254554.6Failure Mode In Tensile Shear TestFailure Mode In Coach Peel TestHardness TestCHAPTER 556CONCLUSION AND REFERENCES60APPENDICES65AGantt Chart66BGantt Chart FYP 267CRepairing RSW Tongs Tip68

xiiLIST OF FIGURESFigure No.2.1TittlePageMacrostructure of dissimilar RSW between stainless steel andgalvanized steel42.2Resistance Spot Welding Machine with workpiece52.3Schematic of the Resistance Spot Welding process62.4Procedure of RSW72.5Effect of welding current on the weld nugget growth: a) 8kAb) 9 kA c) 10 kA d) 11 kA e) 11 kA92.6Effect of welding current on the FZS of GS and SS side92.7Welding Time Cycle2.8Load direction and failure mechanism of interfacial mode;(a) pulling force direction, (b) material failure2.91113Load direction and failure mechanism of pullout mode;(a) force direction, (b) material failure at nugget circumference143.1Methodology Flow Chart163.2LVD shearing machine173.3Bending Process by using Bending Machine183.4Dimension of specimen for Tensile Test193.5Dimension for Coach Peel Test193.6Miller Spot Welder203.7Control Panel213.8Pressure Gauge223.9Lap Joint Welding233.10Coach Peel Joint Welding233.11Welded sample spot 1-5; (a) Galvanized Steel view (b) StainlessSteel view3.1224Welded sample spot 6-13; (a) Galvanized Steel view (b) StainlessSteel view253.13Shimadzu Tensile Test Machine273.14Coach Peel Test28

xiii3.15Load–displacement curve of spot welds during tensile shear test283.16Schematic of Vickers hardness test303.17Hardness level along the horizontal distance from nugget ofgalvanized steel and stainless steel314.1Tensile Shear Test Stress vs Strain344.2Bar Graph (Force) N354.3Main Effects Plot for Means394.4Main Effects Plot for S/N Ratios404.5Coach Peel Test Stress vs Strain424.6Bar Graph (Force) N424.7Main Effects Plot for Means464.8Main Effects Plot for S/N Ratios474.9Stress vs Strain Graph Optimization Test in terms of TensileShear Test4.1049Stress vs Strain Graph Optimization Test in terms of CoachPeel Test514.11Specimen F (6 kA, 4.0 cycle, 35 Psi) under 5X magnification524.12Specimen B (5 kA, 3.5 cycle, 40 Psi) under 5X magnification524.13Interfacial Failure Mode: Sheet is pulled and fracture initiatefrom the centre of the nugget4.14Pullout Failure Mode: parent metal where one sheet is puncturedand other sheet with extended metal4.1554Sample of specimens of different current input; (a): 5 kA,(b): 6 kA, (c): 7 kA4.1653544 specimens of different parameter; Specimen C, Specimen E,Specimen H, Specimen I554.17Point of Hardness Measurement564.18Hardness Profile of SS and GS of Specimen E56

xivLIST OF TABLESTable No.Tittle3.1Setting Table3.2Chemical composition of Stainless Steel (SS) and Galvanized SteelPage18(GS)(wt.%)193.3Sample Spot Numbering and Parameter243.4Sample Spot Numbering and Parameter253.5DOE (L9 Orthogonal Array)323.6Table Design of Experiment324.1Result obtain from Shimadzu tensile Test Machine344.2Parameter and Result364.3S/N Ratio for Tensile Shear Test374.4Estimated Model Coefficients for Means384.5Analysis of Variance for Means384.6Response Table for S/N Ratios394.7Prediction of Optimize parameter404.8Result obtain from Shimadzu tensile Test Machine414.9Parameter and Result434.10S/N Ratio for Coach Peel Test444.11Estimated Model Coefficients for Means454.12Analysis of Variance for Means454.13Response Table for S/N Ratios464.14Prediction of Optimize parameter474.15Comparison between experimental (A I) and Optimize specimen(OP) in terms of Tensile Shear Test4.1648Comparison between experimental (A I) and optimize specimen(OP) in terms of Coach Peel Test50

xvLIST OF EQUATIONSEquation No.TitlePage2.1Heat Generated63.1Vickers Hardness284.1S/N Ratio equation354.2S/N Ratio equation42

xviLIST OF ABBREVIATIONSRSWResistance Spot WeldingGSGalvanized SteelSSStainless SteelRSEWResistance Seam WeldingPWResistance Projection WeldingDOEDesign of ExperimentOAOrthogonal ArrayACAlternating CurrentDCDirect CurrentLEDLight Emitting DiodeS/NSignal-to-NoiseANOVAAnalysis of VarianceFZSFusion Zone SizeHAZHeat Affected ZoneBMBase Metal

1CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.1RESEARCH BACKGROUNDNowadays, economic and environmental considerations are resulted in researchin the automotive industry to form better designs and material combinations forreducing vehicle mass, low fuel consumption and the most important is structuralintegrity which increases the crashworthiness of vehicles. Typically, there are about anaverage of 2000–7000 spot welds in a modern vehicle. In seeking productionoptimization, resistance spot welding (RSW) is a key technology because a techniquemost widely used for bonding during automotive assembly. Simplicity, fast (lowprocess time), low cost and automation possibility are among the advantages of thisprocess. In addition, resistance spot welding does not alter the weight of materials verymuch as compared to traditional arc welding (Chao, 2003; Bayraktar et al., 2004; D. J.Radakovic et al., 2008; Khan et al., 2008; Goodarzi et al., 2009; Pereira et al., 2010;Mehdi, 2010; Badheka et al., 2010; Charde and Arumugam, 2011; Pouranvari, 2011;Jung, 2011; Hayat, 2011,2012; Xu, Chen et al., 2012; Hamidinejad et al., 2012).The project title is “Strength Investigation on Resistance Spot Welding of LowCarbon Steel and Stainless Steel”. From literature low carbon steel and stainless steelpossess a good combination of mechanical properties, weldability, formability and resistto corrosion (Kola et al., 2012). Type of low carbon steel in this research is Galvanized

2Steel. The project research is to obtain the optimize parameter in RSW with goodweldability of the dissimilar welding.1.2PROBLEM STATEMENTCommon problems occur in dissimilar metal joining is the parameters setup toobtain a high strength welded joint (Oba, 2006; Hamidinejad et al., 2012). This happensbecause of different thermal conductivity and the different ways in which metalsrespond to heat (Hasanbaşoğlu and Kaçar, 2007; Tewari, 2010; Miller, 2012; Xu et al.,2012). In order to overcome the problem is by controlling RSW parameters, and byusing the DOE for predicting optimize parameter. Despite that RSW of galvanized steelis difficult because of the zinc coating. The melting point of the zinc coating is lowerthan the fusion temperature of the steel sheet This causes the zinc to vaporize andtendency alloying with the electrode resulting in increased tool wear, and effecting theweldability (Thakur et al., 2010; Miller, 2012).1.3OBJECTIVEThis research is focus on:i.To control and identify the optimum parameters affecting the weldability.ii.To investigate and characterize the failure mode of dissimilar resistance spotwelds between galvanized steel and stainless steel.1.4SCOPE OF RESEARCHIn order to achieve the objective, it should have proper arrangement of scopesproject.This research is focusing on the strength of resistance spot weld joints ofdifferent parameters (Current, Squeeze Time and Pressure). The welded samples wereall equal size and underwent tensile test, coach peel test and metallurgical testing tocharacterize the formation of weld nuggets.

3CHAPTER 2LITERATURE REVIEW2.1INTRODUCTIONA literature search was performed to study and analysis the resistance spotwelding and self-pierce riveting process. It also includes the investigation of what othershave done in this area.2.2DISSIMILAR WELDINGDissimilar metal welding are common in found in construction where welding isinvolve because of their excellent performance to the function of the whole structure.Dissimilar metal welding involves two or more different metals or alloys joiningtogether (M. Alenius et al., 2006). In joining two dissimilar metals, several problemsarise, related to the different on physical and mechanical properties, microstructure,chemical composition, melting point, electrical resistivity, thermal conductivity andthermal coefficient (Saeed et al., 2010; Kola et al., 2012). Differences in the electricalresistivity and thermal conductivity of two dissimilar steel in RSW will lead to anasymmetrical weld nugget in joints (Mehdi, 2010). Figure 2.1 shows the asymmetricalweld of galvanizes steel and stainless steel.

4Another common problem in dissimilar welding is an intermetallic compound(IMC) layer is form (Xu et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2013). It is believed that brittleintermetallic layers are the main reason for poor dissimilar joint performance becausefatigue failure of dissimilar welds always occurred at the interface where intermetalliccompounds were formed. Which typically have a low critical stress intensity factor andeasily to crack (X. Sun et al., 2004; Tewari, 2010; Liu et al., 2010, 2013).Figure 2.1: Macrostructure of dissimilar RSW between stainless steel and galvanizedsteelSource: Marashi et al., 20082.3RESISTANCE WELDINGThere are several types of resistance welding which are Resistance spot welding(RSW), resistance seam welding (RSEW) and resistance projection welding (PW). Thisprocess has been predominant mode in joining process in the manufacturing industriesand automotive production (Chao, 2003; Oba, 2006; Kahraman, 2007; D. J. RadakovicAnd M. Tumuluru, 2008; Thakur et al., 2010; Tewari, 2010; Pouranvari, 2011).As the name is resistance welding, it is refer to the material resistance to theflow of electric current that causes a localized heating in the joint and weld is made(Tewari, 2010; Miller, 2012). The process is completed within a specified cycle time.Generally, melting occurs at the faying surface during welding. The Resistance Spot

5Welding (RSW) is getting significant importance in manufacturing car, bus and railwaybodies etc. due to automatic and fast process (Thakur et al., 2010).Figure 2.2: Resistance Spot Welding Machine with workpieceSource: Jenis, 20092.4 PRINCIPLES OF RESISTANCE SPOT WELDINGResistance spot welding(RSW) is one of the oldest of the electric weldingprocesses today and the technique applied for joining almost all known metals (Tewari,2010; Hayat, 2011). It is a process of joining metal components through the fusion ofdiscrete spots at the interface of the work pieces (Pereira et al., 2010). RSW processinvolves electric current and mechanical force of the electrode tips of a propermagnitude for a length of time (Pouranvari, 2011).The flow of electric current via twocopper electrodes tips that also press the work sheets together to form weld (Charde andArumugam, 2011). The weld nugget is formed due to the fusion of the melted metallocalized heating in the joint due to the resistance of the joint surfaces of the base metalto electrical current flow (Goodarzi et al., 2009).

6Figure 2.3: Schematic of the Resistance Spot Welding processSource: Jenis, 20092.5SPOT WELDS PARAMETERSA quality desired product in resistance spot welding is need to either by controlthe changing variables that affect during welding process or the parameters that affectthe process (Oba, 2006).2.5.1 The Parameters in Resistance Spot WeldingThe three main parameters in spot welding well known are electrode force,welding current and welding time. These are the most important welding parameters inresistance spot weld (Qiu, 2009). In order to produce good quality weld the aboveparameters must be controlled properly. The amount of heat generated in this process isgoverned by the formula,Q I2 R T( 2.1)

7WhereQ heat generated, JoulesI current, AmperesR resistance of the work piece, OhmsT time of current flow, secondSource: Thakur et al., 2010Figure 2.4 below shows the procedure of the welding parameter on resistance spot weld.Figure 2.4: Procedure of RSWSource: Salem, 2011

82.5.1.1 Welding CurrentWelding current is one of most the important parameter in the welding process.In resistance spot welding, current is important for determining the heat generation fromthe process. An optimum amount of welding current is generally required to produceadequate heat energy for a weld nugget to form with minimum size diameter. However,excess welding current causes void and crack formations (Qiu, 2009; Salem, 2011).On the basis of macrostructure analysis, it can be stated that the higher thewelding current that is used, the larger the fusion zone (Mehdi, 2010; A. AravinthanAnd C. Nachimani, 2011; Pouranvari, 2011; Kola et al., 2012). Lower electricalresistance of carbon steels, which is even lower for low carbon galvanized steel, but itshigher thermal conductivity compared to stainless steel which leads to smaller fusionzone in the former. Heat affected zone (HAZ) in the galvanized steel side is wider thanthat in the stainless steel side. This determine that galvanized related to higher thermalconductivity as shows in Figure 2.5 (Pouranvari et al., 2008). Figure 2.6 Shows that thefusion zone size (FZS) of both stainless steel and galvanized steel side increases withthe welding current with the exception of really high currents of more than 11 kA whichshow a decrease in the FZS due to expulsion. Optimum welding current that producegood weld quality has to be determined and selected in the resistance welding process(Oba, 2006).

9Figure 2.5: Effect of welding current on the weld nugget growth: a) 8kA b) 9kA c) 10kA d) 11 kA e) 11 kASource: M. Pouranvari et al.,2008Figure 2.6: Effect of welding current on the FZS of GS and SS sideSource: Marashi et al., 2008

102.5.1.2 Weld TimeWeld time is the time during which electric current is applied to the metal sheetsfor welding. In the welding process, when the welding time increase the size of weldnugget also increase. This is because the relation of the heat generation is directlyproportional to the welding time. From the process, the heat transfer from the electriccurrent to the workpiece, usually start from the weld zone then to the surrounding basemetals of workpiece. In AC systems, the weld time is expressed in cycles (one cycle is1/60 of a second in a 60 Hz power system), while millisecond is used for DC systems.During squeeze time, metal sheets are placed in position and clamped by electrodes(Jung, 2011).Weld time increased, the weld strength initially shows an increase due tosufficient time given for the weld to develop. However at prolonged weld time, wouldincrease the softening effect, overheating causes the molten metal to expel from theweld zone and hence the joint strength decrease (Salem, 2011; Charde and Arumugam,2011).2.5.1.3 Squeeze TimeSqueeze time as shown in Figure 2.4, is a time where pressure application andweld to occur in between. During squeeze time, metal sheets are placed in position andclamped by electrodes. When the electrode force has reached the desired level, weldingproceeds by the application of current. During this time, melting and joining occurs(Jung, 2011). For the process, the squeeze time required level of the pressure is set forthe electrode pressing pressure to the workpiece before the electric current is flow andweld is form (Oba, 2006).2.5.1.4 Hold TimeHold time is the period of time, after the welding time is complete and occurredwhen the electrodes are still applied to the sheet with current switched off but pressurecontinued. This time is to chill the welded part. The period of hold time must be setoptimum to give time for the molten metal to solidify but it must not be too long toprevent the heat in the weld spot to spread to the electrode and heating it. The electrode

11will then get more exposed to wear. In addition, the thicker the workpiece the longer thehold time needed (Oba, 2006; Kahraman, 2007).Figure 2.7: Welding Time Cycle2.6 MATERIAL SELECTIONStainless steel and low carbon steel such as Galvanized steel formed a goodcombination of formability, weldability, mechanical properties and resistance tocorrosion. This combination of steels is mostly used in the power generation industry(Kola et al., 2012).2.6.1 Galvanized SteelGalvanized steel is chemically treated steel which prevent it from corroding. It isbecause the steel was coated in layers of protective metal that is zinc oxide becausewhich does not get rust easily. The coating gives the steel a harder, durable and to hardscratch finish. Galvanizes steel commonly used as infrastructure to ensure that thestructure will withstand corrosion for longer period. Galvanized steel frames are used inessential industries such as power infrastructure where failure cannot be tolerated. Steelframes used in commercial buildings and residential homes also use galvanized steel toform structures that will last. Bridges are made with galvanized steel to withstand watervapor from rivers or the sea. Structures made with galvanized steel typically need lessmaintenance than those formed from other materials, which are prone to rusting.Galvanizes steel is lower electrical resistance than low carbon steel but highconductivity (Marashi et al., 2008; M. Pouranvari et al., 2008; Mehdi, 2010).

12The common ways of making steel resist rust is by alloying (combining) it witha metal that is not likely to corrode for example zinc. The steel was bonded to zincpermanently by chemical reaction when submerged the steel in melted zinc. The outerlayer is all zinc, but successive layers are a mixture of iron and zinc, with an internallayer of pure steel. The more demanding of galvanized steel sheet in weldability than ofordinary steel sheets because of the existence of spatter generating and cause electrodepollution during the spot welding. The application of galvanized steel sheets is limitedin extensive automatic fabrication of automotive products (Hamidinejad et al., 2012).2.6.2 Stainless SteelStainless steel is made from several numbers of different steels and was used fortheir anti-corrosive element to resist of corrosive environments. It ensures for longerlasting and safety in in the used for example tools and infrastructure. Stainless steel is anearth friendly material because it can be recycled by melted it down and made intosomething else.Stainless steel is usually made by chromium minimum 10.5% to make the steelstainless. A layer of chromium oxide film on the steel improves the corrosion resistance.Despite that, there are other elements used to make stainless steel. It’s includingnitrogen, molybdenum and nickel. The mixing of these elements together enables avariety of properties in machining, forming and welding and also welding because ofdifferent crystal structures form.2.7MECHANICAL TESTMechanical testing is an important aspect of weldability study. Such testing iseither for revealing important welds characteristics, such as weld nugget diameter orweld button size, or for obtaining and evaluating the quantitative measures of weld’sstrength. Mechanical testing of a weldment can be static or dynamic test and among thestatic test, tension shear or tensile shear testing is commonly used in determining weldstrength or the tensile strength of the welded joints because it is easy to conduct the testand the specimens for the test is simple in fabrication.

132.7.1 Failure ModeFailure mode is a qualitative measure of resistance spot weld (RSW) weldabilityperformance. The failure developed criterions of spot welds are performing the strengthtest using interfacial and pullout mode.Generally, failure mode in resistance spot weld (RSW) is the manner in whichspot weld fails which occurs in two modes interfacial and pullout mode (Chao, 2003). Inthe interfacial mode, failure occurs via crack propagation through the fusion zone asshown Figure 2.8. In the pullout mode, failure occurs via complete or partial nuggetwithdrawal from one sheet as shown in Figure 2.9. Failure mode of RSW cansignificantly affect their energy absorption capability and load carrying capacity. Spotwelds that fail in nugget pullout mode provide higher peak loads and energy absorptionlevels than those spot welds which fail in interfacial failure mode. To ensure reliabilityof the spot welds during automotive lifetime, optimized parameters should be determineso that failure mode will be guaranteed (Chao, 2003; Goodarzi et al., 2009; M.Pouranvari and P. Marashi, 2009).weld nuggetweld nuggetForceForceForceForce(a)(b)Figure 2.8: Load direction and failure mechanism of interfacial mode; (a) pulling forcedirection, (b) material failureSource: Badheka et al., 2010

optimization, resistance spot welding (RSW) is a key technology because a technique most widely used for bonding during automotive assembly. Simplicity, fast (low process time), low cost and automation possibility are among the advantages of this process. In addition, resistance spot

Related Documents:

Texts of Wow Rosh Hashana II 5780 - Congregation Shearith Israel, Atlanta Georgia Wow ׳ג ׳א:׳א תישארב (א) ׃ץרֶָֽאָּהָּ תאֵֵ֥וְּ םִימִַׁ֖שַָּה תאֵֵ֥ םיקִִ֑לֹאֱ ארָָּ֣ Îָּ תישִִׁ֖ארֵ Îְּ(ב) חַורְָּ֣ו ם

Chapter 3 3.1 The Importance of Strength 3.2 Strength Level Required KINDS OF STRENGTH 3.3 Compressive Strength 3.4 Flexural Strength 3.5 Tensile Strength 3.6 Shear, Torsion and Combined Stresses 3.7 Relationship of Test Strength to the Structure MEASUREMENT OF STRENGTH 3.8 Job-Molded Specimens 3.9 Testing of Hardened Concrete FACTORS AFFECTING STRENGTH 3.10 General Comments

Tabel 4. Pre-test and Post-test Data of athletes'' arm strength, abdominal strength, back strength and leg strength. Subject No. Arm Strength Abdominal Strength Back Strength Leg Strength Pre-Test Post-Test Pre-Test Post-Test Pre-Test Post-Test Pre-Test Post-Test 1

Application 11: Strength Training (CR 11-9) Reinforcement 11: Strength Word Scramble (CR 11-10) Personal Project 11: Logging and Planning Resistance Training Exercises for Strength (CR 11-11) Activity: Fundamentals of Weight and Resistance Training Activity Cards 119-129 Fundamentals of Weight and Resistance Training Worksheet (SW 11-2) Ancillaries

ACI 211.1 (150 300 mm cylinder strength) DoE plots ( 150 mm cube strength) w/c ratio c/w ratio Cube strength 1.25 cylinder strength (a) DoE and ACI . plots 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 0 20 40 60 80 Strength (MPa) c/w ratio Cube strength 1.25 cylinder strength ACI 211.1 (150 300 mm cyl

DNV has a long history of providing incident investigation services and . 2. Need for incident investigation 3. Investigation process 4. Investigation assessment – selected results 5. Findings of investigation - recommendations and expectations 6. Comments from GenCat 7. Concluding remarks

determine the expected sensor resistance from Table 2. 4. Using an ohmmeter, measure the actual resistance across the two sensor leads. 5. Compare the expected resistance to the actual resistance. 6. If the sensor's actual resistance deviates substantially from the expected resistance

Understanding the principles of resistance thermometry as they apply to resistance thermometers and thermistors will help you achieve consistent and accurate readings from your temperature sensing instruments. A resistance thermometer consists of a metallic element whose resistance increases with temperature. Their