MP - Live Medicine

2y ago
16 Views
2 Downloads
9.87 MB
28 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Rosemary Rios
Transcription

aMPAdvance Medial-Pivot Knee SystemThe Bi-Cruciate-Substituting KneeDesignRationale

Table of ContentTotal Knee Arthroplasty - A History3-7The Story8-9Design 2-23Wear24-26Patient Preference27

Total Knee Arthroplasty - A HistoryIn knee replacements,the prosthetic components must work in concert with existingligaments and provide normal kinematics and function in caseswhere ligaments are compromised or sacrificed. It is particularlyimportant to maintain the function provided by the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). This can be achieved either by retaining theligament or by substituting for it using a post and cam mechanismor a raised anterior lip.Knee replacements have made leaps and bounds from theirinception and continue to surpass previous designs.How did we get wherewe are now?The theory states the knee joint is a particularly sophisticated kindof four-bar link, because the cruciate ligaments are not rigid andhave to be kept taut by the rolling action of the bones.FEMURPCLACLTIBIAThe history of total knees may be traced back as far as 1860,when Gluck fashioned a crude total knee of ivory that featureda simple hinge. The device allowed only a limited angle ofrotation and motion in a single direction. Gluck’s hinge yieldedgreat strength, but was not biocompatible. Over the next 100years, the knee was thought to behave according to this simplehinge design. It was not until the mid 1960s when researchersand surgeons again turned their attention to total knee replacements. During this time, the kinematic assumptions in knees hadchanged; no longer did researchers believe the knee was a simplehinge. As the knee has many critical geometrical characteristics,researchers thought the two cruciate ligaments and the two legbones formed a very sophisticated and precise mechanism, calleda four-bar link. Many total knee designs were based around thisrationale. This four-bar link mechanism of the knee is shown atvarious stages of rotation in FIGURE 1.One important feature of the four-bar link theory is that theinstantaneous center of rotation coincides with the cross-overpoint of the cruciate ligaments. This cross-over point moves as thejoint flexes and extends so the knee does not have a fixed point ofrotation that is found in a simple hinge joint.FIGURE 1 Four-Bar Link TheoryIt was not until the release of the ICLH Knee, which was designedby Drs. Freeman and Swanson, that the four-bar link wasdiscredited. Their implant relied heavily on component geometry,ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System3

and retaining soft tissue balance and both cruciate ligamentsto provide stability. However, this design, although greatin theory, experienced complications including instability,prosthetic loosening, and patellofemoral abnormalities.These issues and other complications resulted in a revision rateof 28.5%, naming instability as the major cause.1 Due to the complications within the patellofemoral joint,subsequent designs in the 1970s improved fixation andintroduced patellofemoral joint replacement options.The Total Condylar Knee, developed by Dr. John Insall, was thefirst prosthetic design aimed at solving both of these issues.Insall’s device featured a round-on-round geometry in boththe coronal and sagittal planes. This design touted partialconformity, which aimed at providing mediolateral stability.Fixation was improved by adding a central stem to the tibialbase that ran down the center of the tibial canal. Insall’s firstattempt featured an all-polyethylene base, and it was notuntil the mid-1970s that a cobalt chromium baseplate wasintroduced. Although a design much aheadof its time, axialcompression tests would later show failureof the prosthesis.2Later in the 1970s the first mobile-bearing knee was created.Its designers, Drs. Buechel and Pappas, aimed to design amobile-bearing, metal-backed knee system with low constraintforces and low contact stresses which would allow normaljoint articulation and loading. The result was the New JerseyKnee, or as it later became known, the LCS (Low Contact Stress)Mobile-Bearing Knee. At that time, fixed-bearing designs hadbeen unable to provide mobility while eliminating unnecessaryconstraint forces. Buechel and Pappas believed a mobilebearing prosthesis would eliminate unnecessary constraintforces and produce low constraint forces and low contactstresses. By doing so, surgical misalignment may be corrected,and both intraoperative adjustment of the joint space andpostoperative replacement of the bearings may be carriedout without disturbing the fixation of the device.3 However,complications with the LCS Knee included bearing dislocation,bearing breakage and an increase in polyethylene wear. 4Even if all the ligaments are healthy, it may be advantageousto sacrifice the cruciate ligaments and substitute their functionthrough features of an implant. This approach was originallyintroduced to increase the amount of exposure available tothe surgeon to make it easier to properly prepare the fixationsurfaces. Many femoral components featured sagittal planegeometry that approximated the shape of the natural condyleswhile the tibial plateaus were “dished” to provide constraint inthe anterior-posterior direction. The constraint provided by thisgeometry was generally sufficient to replicate ACL function, butnot PCL function, which was a major drawback of the originalTotal Condylar device developed inthe early 1970s.The 1980s were also a changing time for the orthopaediccommunity. Many orthopaedic companies began designing totalknee replacements with expanded sizing options to fit patients’needs. These companies touted complete interchangeability tosuit the differences in femoral and tibial geometry. There wasalso a major push toward creating instrumentation that aided inmaking total knee procedures easily repeatable. There was also anincreasing need to create the most natural-feeling knee possible;however, little kinematic research had been performed to studynatural knee motion.In the 1990s, total knee implants were still based on the four-barlink theory. Implants designed on this philosophy had J-curvedfemoral components, which boasted changing radii on the sagittalprofile of the femoral component in an attempt tore-create rollback. FIGURE 3 Fluoroscopic research was performed that actuallyshowed the medial side of the knee acted more like a ball-insocket joint, similar to a hip.According to this literature, the condyles, which are actuallycircular, do not rollback at the same time. In the normal knee,kinematic analyses showed the tibia rotates about a constant axisin flexion. Further anatomic evaluation of the femur indicated thedistances between this axis and the distal and posterior condylarsurfaces are nearly equal. FIGURE 4 5,6,9,10R1R3R2FIGURE 3 J-CurvedFemoral ComponentThis data showed that the way in which researchers designed totalknees was incorrect from a kinematic perspective. The ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee from MicroPort Orthopedics, launched in 1998,is designed with a different philosophy on kinematic knee motion.This philosophy surmised that the knee moved differently thanpreviously thought.FIGURE 4 Distal Radius (Rd) Posterior Radius (Rp)FIGURE 2 Total Condylar KneeADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System44

The History ofTotal Knee ArthroplastyImplant: Walldius Hinge1Designer: WalldiusImplant:Geometric(Howmedica, nowStryker)1, 2Designer: Turner, CoventryTotal CondylarKnee1, 2Designer: Insall, Walker,RanawatImplant:New Jersey Knee,aka Low ContactStress (LCS) MobileBearing Knee1, 2Designer: Buechel, Pappas1972Implant: Duocondylar Knee1, 2Designer: Ranawat, Insall, ShineImplant:University ofCalifornia Irvine (UCI)Knee (Wright nowMicroPort Orthopedics)1Designer: WaughImplant:Anatomic Knee(DePuy)1, 2Designer: Townley1982197819751974Implant: ICLH1Designer: Freeman, SwansonImplant:Implant: Polycentric Knee1, 2Designer: Gunston197219711971Implant: Ivory Hinge1Designer: Gluck1968196819581860This timeline offers an overview of the genealogy of the total knee systems from every major orthopaedic company.Countless total knees have been designed throughout the years. Those most frequently referenced are listed here.Implant:Insall-Burstein (I/B )PS Knee (Zimmer)2Designer: Insall, BursteinImplant:ORTHOLOC (Wright nowMicroPort Orthopedics)3Designer: WhitesideADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System5

Implant:Profix (Smith &Nephew)18Designer: Whiteside19871985Implant: Scorpio (Stryker)19Designer: Becker, Antonio, Incavo, Lotke1991Implant: Maxim (Biomet)12Designer: Lombardi, Vaughn19961995Duracon (Howmedica, nowStryker)13, 15Borden, Habermarin,Hedley, Hungerford,KrackowImplant: PFC (DePuy)13, 17Designer: Scott, Thornhill,RanawatImplant:Natural Knee II(Sulzer Medica, nowZimmer)16Designer: HoffmanImplant: ADVANCE Medial-Pivot20Designer: Blaha, Maloney, Schmidt199819971996DesignerORTHOLOC II (Wright nowMicroPort Orthopedics)7Designer: WhitesideAXIOM (ORTHOMET,now MicroPort Orthopedics)11Designer: Hood & KennedyADVANTIM Modular (Wright nowMicroPort Orthopedics)10Designer: mplant: MG II (Zimmer)13, 14Designer: Miller, GalanteNatural Knee I (SulzerMedica, now Zimmer)2, 6Designer: Hoffman199019891988Implant: Rotaglide 8, 9Designer: WilsonImplant:LCS Total Knee System(DePuy)5Designer: Buechel, Pappas199819831984Implant:Implant: AGC (Biomet)4Designer: Ritter & DanielImplant: Ascent (Biomet)22Designer: Bassett, JacobsADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System6

Implant: Vanguard (Biomet)25Designer: LombardiImplant: NexGen (Zimmer)24Designer: Walker, Andriacchi,InsallImplant:JOURNEY BCS(Smith & Nephew)26Designer: Smith, Dugas, Cain20102007PFC Sigma RotatingPlatform (DePuy)23Designer: Scott, : Triathlon (Stryker)27Designer: Krakow, Hungerford,SavoryImplant:EVOLUTION (Wrightnow MicroPort Orthopedics)28Designer: Anderson, Barnes,Blaha, DeBoer, Maloney,Schmidt, Penenberg, JinnahNOTE:Only launched in the U.S.REFERENCES1. Ranawat MD, Chitranjan S. “History of Total Knee Replacement.” Orthopaedic Care: MediCaland Surgical Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders, A Comprehensive, Peer-Reviewed.Southern Orthopaedic Association, 2006, p. 1-29.2. Insall MD, John N. “Total Knee Arthroplasty with Posterior Cruciate Ligament SubstitutionDesigns.” Surgery of the Knee, 2nd Ed., p. 829-69.3. MicroPort Orthopedics Surgical Technique for ORTHOLOC .4. Biomet Surgical Technique for AGC TKA.5. DePuy Surgical Technique for LCS TKA.6. Sulzer Medica Surgical Technique for Natural Knee I TKA.7. MicroPort Orthopedics Surgical Technique for ORTHOLOC II TKA.8. Polyzoides AJ. The Rotaglide TKA. Prosthesis design and early results. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11(4):453-9.9. Corin Surgical Technique for Rotaglide TKA.10. MicroPort Orthopedics Surgical Technique for ADVANTIM TKA.11. Orthomet Surgical Technique for AXIOM TKA.12. Biomet Surgical Technique for Maxim TKA.13. Walker MD, Peter S. “Design of Total Knee Arthroplasty.” Surgery of the Knee, 3rd Ed., p. 723-738.14. Zimmer Surgical Technique for MG II TKA.15. Howmedica Surgical Technique for Duracon TKA.16. Zimmer Surgical Technique for Natural Knee II TKA.17. Johnson & Johnson DePuy Surgical Technique for PFC Sigma TKA.18. Smith & Nephew Surgical Technique for Profix TKA.19. Stryker Surgical Technique for Scorpio TKA.20. MicroPort Orthopedics Surgical Technique for ADVANCE Medial-Pivot TKA.21. MK282-100022. Biomet Surgical Technique for Ascent TKA.23. Johnson & Johnson, DePuy Surgical Technique for PFC Sigma Rotating Platform TKA.24. Zimmer Surgical Technique for NexGen TKA.25. Biomet Surgical Technique for Vanguard TKA.26. Knee product review, Smith & Nephew, 200627. Stryker Surgical Technique for Triathlon TKA.28. MicroPort Orthopedics Surgical Technique for EVOLUTION Medial-Pivot TKA.ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System7

ADVANCE Medial-PivotThe StoryMany patients complainof a loss of stabilitydue to total knee replacement, and this is sometimes calledanterior femoral sliding. In the literature this is referred to as“paradoxical motion.” This term was made prominent byRick Komistek, PhD, who is a prominent fluoroscopic researcher.This femoral sliding or “paradoxical motion” may be caused by anincreased flexion gap or total knee incongruity from an implantthat was designed to allow rollback.1,2In general, total knees may reduce the natural stability of theknee. Instead of rolling back, the femoral component slidesanteriorly. This is considered a paradox because total kneesare designed to rollback, but instead they slide forward. In atypical total knee replacement, as the knee goes into flexionat approximately 20 , the weight of the body pushes thefemur forward along the tibia. The femur will continue to slideforward until it’s stopped by the PCL or remaining musculature.Furthermore, this sliding forward puts added stress on theremaining soft tissues.FIGURE 1 Medial compartmentThis “paradoxical motion” is also present in posterior-stabilizedknees.1,2 Many surgeons believe that posterior-stabilized knees areunable to slide forward due to the post and cam articulation. Thishas been shown in the literature to be false. Posterior-stabilizedtotal knee replacements slide forward until they contact the post.In terms of the four-bar link theory, once the cam engages thepost, the rotational axis of a traditional posterior-stabilized kneebecomes the post.The MRI images shown in FIGURES 1 and 2 are visual examples ofhow the normal knee moves.3 These were MRIs provided as partof a study from Mr. Michael Freeman, a British surgeon, and VeraPinskerova, a Czechoslovakian PhD. The medial compartment ofthe tibial plateau is concave and “rocks” from a relatively posteriorcontact to anterior contact. FIGURE 1 The meniscus, the centerof the contact area and the penetration point of the flexion axis,moves forward with extension, but the medial femoral condyledoes not.3-5Unlike the medial side, the lateral meniscus moves forward withthe femur during extension. Thus, the tibiofemoral contact areaalso moves forward with extension resulting in an arcuate zone ofcontact. FIGURE 2FIGURE 2 Lateral compartmentADVANCE Medial-PivotADVANCE Medial-Pivot KneeKneeSystemSystem88

There are several features in the normal knee that make itstable: the musculature, capsule, collateral ligaments, the ACL,and PCL. Nearly 60% of body weight is transferred through themedial side of the knee. The medial side of the tibial plateauis concave in shape and, along with the medial intercondylareminence, acts to prevent anterior translation of the medialfemoral condyle. The opposite is true, however, for the lateralcompartment of the knee. This side is convex in shape and,coupled with a “humped” intercondylar eminence, allows arcuatetranslation. These structures create a knee that is more stable onthe medial side than the lateral side. Differences in stability led tothe concept of medial-pivot kinematics. FIGURE 3A medial-pivoting tibial insert is provided in the ADVANCE KneeSystem, designed to reproduce the rotational and translationalkinematics of the normal knee. On the lateral side there is anarcuate path, which allows 15 of motion around a medial-pivotpoint. That pivot point is on the medial side and is provided by aspherical concave surface. The anterior lip is designed to preventanterior slide, while the posterior lip is designed to replace theACL and prevent posterior slide. FIGURE 4Medial posterior lipreplaces ACL andstops posterior slideLateral meniscalpath allows for 15 of motionAFIGURE 4 MedialPivot InsertCBMedial anterior lip replacesPCL and stops anterior slideMedial meniscal“socket” providesstabilityDLateral meniscusallows motionPCL stopsanterior slideACL stopsposterior slideMedial meniscusand concave surfaceprovide stabilityFIGURE 5 The ADVANCE femur features spherical femoral condylesFIGURE 3 Superior view of the tibial plateauThe ADVANCE femoral implant has a constant sagittal radius of curvature extending from full extension to 90 degrees flexion. FIGURE 6The curvature values for each femoral implant were chosen from a detailed analysis of 130 cadaveric femora performed by Dr D. Blaha.In the study, the radius of curvature of the femur was measured between the average flexion-extension axis and the distal surface of thefemur every 10 degrees to 90 degrees flexion.6 The ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee also matches the sagittal radius with the radius in thecoronal plane to create the partial sphere of the femoral components. FIGURE 5In the sagittal plane the femoral component also features a smaller closing radius which has been shown to increase range of motion.7 FIGURE 7To further increase range of motion, the shape of the femoral component is complemented by the anterior stability of the ADVANCE Medial-Pivot tibial inserts. These components provide a robust anterior lip which maintains the femoral component in the posterior thirdof the articular surface. FIGURE 8 This creates a long quadriceps lever arm and reduces anterior sliding in flexion.1REFERENCESClosing Radius90 FIGURE 8 Femoralposition of ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee60 0 30 FIGURE 6 Constant radiusfrom 0 to 90 flexionFIGURE 7 Smallerclosing radius1/3 A-PA-P1. Komistek R. In vivo fluoroscopic analyses ofthe normal human knee. Clin Orthop RelatRes. 2003;410:69-81.2. Schmidt R. Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciateretaining and medial pivot knee implants.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:139-147.3. Freeman M. The movement of the normaltibiofemoral joint. J Biomechanics.2005;38:197-208.4. Pinskerova V. Knee imaging study shedsnew light on fl exion, rollback. OrthopaedicsToday. 1999.5. Freeman. The movement of the knee studiedby magnetic resonance imaging. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 2003;410:35-43.6. Blaha JD. Using the transepicondylar axis todefi ne the sagittal morphology of the distalpart of the femur. JBJS 2002; 84:S48-55.7. Iwaki et al, JBJS 82-B, n 8 (2000): 1189-95ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System9

ADVANCE Medial-PivotDesignFeaturesADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System10

ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Femoral ComponentConstant RadiusDesigned to restore the sagittal curvature of the femur withconstant radii from 0 to 90 , which delivers constant contactarea in flexion and extension.The single radius of curvature extends from 0 to 90 on the medial andlateral condyle. Additionally, the coronal radius is equal to the sagittalradius. These features provide the “ball” in the “ball-in-socket” design andcreate an extension geometry on the medial condyle that is equal to theflexion geometry. Coupled with the spherical medial side of the tibia, thisfeature prevents “paradoxical motion” (anterior translation of the femuron the tibia as the knee goes into flexion), but also maintains contact areaand prevents laxity throughout the range of motion.Extension ReliefIndentation on the medial flange allows the surgeon to adjustposterior slope while still ensuring full extension.An “extension relief” is built into the transition of the single radius of themedial condyle to permit clearance with the anterior lip of each tibialinsert. This indentation allows for optimized stability and contact area and isintended to reduce pain and risk of impingment during hyperflexion.1Medial Condylar“Extension Relief”Trochlear Groove3.6 Optimizes patellar tracking.FIGURE 1The trochlear groove features a lateral anatomic flare designed tooptimize the patella tracking. This trochlear groove has been designedwith the intent of minimizing strain in the lateral retinacular tissues anddecreasing the need for lateral retinacular releases.2 FIGURE 1FIGURE 2The trochlear groove is deepened on the femoral implant which isdesigned to reduce overstuffing and allow proper function of extensormechanism. FIGURE 2Anatomic TrochlearGroove DepthAdditionally, the trochlear groove has been extended posteriorly, sothe patella has full contact with the femoral implant into deep flexion.This is also proven to significantly reduce patellofemoral complicationscompared to PS designs.3 FIGURE 3ADVANCE Knee SystemAnatomic TrochlearGroove Depth RestoredCompetition:Heightened TrochlearGroove DepthFIGURE 3ADVANCE KneeCompetitive KneesADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System11

ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Femoral ComponentTrochlear Groove (continued)A lateral anterior flange which rises 2mm-6mm above the floor of thetrochlear groove provides resistance to lateral subluxation.42mm-6mmThis design feature maintains patellar tracking in the early stages of flexion.5Anterior Flange6 Designed to prevent femoral notching.The anterior flange of the femoral implants for the ADVANCE Medial-PivotKnee System is configured at a 6 angle. This angle of this anterior flangeresection is designed to help the surgeon avoid notching of the anteriorcortex.Femoral Peg LocationsSimplifies implant downsizing.The ADVANCE Medial-Pivot femurs are designed to maintain a commondistance from stabilizer pegs to the anterior flange resection (anteriorreferencing). When downsizing only the posterior cut is modified whileleaving the anterior reference untouched.Overlay of ADVANCE Size 1 and 6 Femoral ComponentsPosterior CondylesAllows for greater contact area up to 90 of flexion.Sizes 1-5: 8mmSize 6: 9mmThick posterior condyles allow for achievement of maximum flexion potential,but also require sacrificing femoral bone.6The ADVANCE femoral condyles have been designed to compromisebetween conservation of posterior femoral bone and achievement of goodflexion potential.14 The constant thickness for the ADVANCE posteriorcondyles allows for a smooth blending radius and an increased contact area inflexion in comparison to competitor’s design.15Sizes 1-5: 8mmSize 6: 9mmPatellaClinically proven implants.The femoral components interact with a domed patella, which is clinicallyproven in ADVANCE Knee Systems for over a decade.7,8 The forgivingspherical dome design permits freedom of patellar tilt and rotation seenduring normal functional activities after knee replacement.9-11ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System12

ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Tibial Insert ComponentCondylar GeometryDesigned to restore natural kinematics.The ADVANCE coronal and sagittal radii for each of the medial and lateral femoral condyles produces two partial spheres. The spherical medial femoral condylepivots about the matching spherical depression on the tibial insert, while 15 of rotation around the medial-pivot point is allowed with an arcuate path on thelateral articular surface. This “ball-in-socket” medial-pivot mechanism maximizes medial congruency while providing controlled A-P translation on the lateralarticular surface.A comparative fluoroscopic evaluation has shown the ADVANCE Medial-Pivot design closely reproduces the motion of the normal knee, and avoids theparadoxical motion demonstrated in traditional total knees.12Cross Section Through the Lateral Condyle:Less Constrained Than Medial SideRotationAround Medial CondyleLateral compartmentallows for rotationaround medial pivotMedial compartmentallows for anteriorposterior stability,replacement of ACLand PCLCoronal and sagittal radii are equalon the femoral component.The coronal radius is matchedin the polyethylene insert.Cross Section Through the Medial Condyle:“Ball-in-Socket” CongruencyBone Conservation0,8Medial-PivotDesigned to substitute the PCL and not sacrifice bone.0,7Standard PSAs a posterior cruciate sacrificing device, the ADVANCE Medial-Pivotinsert is more bone conserving than traditional posterior stabilizedknees which requires resection of the femoral bone for the spine/cammechanism engagement.130,60,50,40,30,20,10Volume/Cubed InchesInstead of a traditional spine/cam mechanism, the insert features ananterior lip which provides a vertical jumping distance of 11mm for allsizes. The horizontal jumping distance for this lip is size dependent, andvaries between 23mm-32mm.ADVANCE Medial-Pivotvertical jumping distance is11 mm. Horizontal jumpingdistance ranges from 23 mmto 32 mm (size dependent).11 mm23 mm-32 mmADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System13

ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Tibial Tray ComponentTibial SizingImproved bone coverage and fit.Eleven tibial tray sizes are available within the ADVANCE Medial-Pivot KneeSystem. Within these sizes, six are known as “standard” and five as “plus”options, which configure a smaller locking mechanism on a larger tibial baseprofile. These have been generated to accommodate the interchangeabilityneeds for the system.For example, the tibial tray size 3 features the same dimension of the tibialtray size 4 and the femoral component size 3 can be implanted with tibial traysize 3 or 3 , as shown in the Table.FEMURINSERTTIBIAL TRAY111 or 1 222 or 2 333 or 3 444 or 4 555 or 5 666Dovetail Locking MechanismDovetail capture reduces micromotion.Applied loadthrough femurPeripheraldovetailThe locking mechanism of the ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System relies ona dovetail capture and an interference fit to reduce micromotion.PeripheraldovetailOrientation MarkingsFacilitate rotational alignment.Orientation markings have been incorporated into the anterior portion of thetibial base implant to allow the surgeon to identify rotational position of thetibial base implant during final impaction.The orientation markings aid in properly aligning the tibial base. This is accomplished byaligning the center orientation marking with the medial one-third of the tibial tubercle.The other markings allow versatility to help align the base for any exposure.ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System14

ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Tibial Tray ComponentKeelSize 1Size 6Proportional increase with sizes.The tibial stem of the ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System has been madeincreasing proportional with the size. This allows for easier insertion for thesmaller components of the range.35mm50mmBuilt-In Posterior SlopePosteriorStem and keel incorporate 3 posterior slope.The ADVANCE Medial-Pivot tibial base keels are angled 3 posteriorly. Thisensures that even if posterior slope is resected on the proximal tibia the keel isoriented properly down the cortex of the tibia. The thickness of the tibial baseimplant is 4mm. This number correlates to the thickness of the selected tibialinsert thickness.6mm4mmFor instance, if a 10mm thick insert is selected, the actual thickness of thebearing surface is 6mm. The 10mm thickness read on the label is actually acombination of the insert base thickness and the bearing surface thickness.The ADVANCE Medial-Pivot tibial inserts have 0 slope build into the implant:the articular surface is parallel to the bottom of the insert.3 Posterior SlopeREFERENCES1. Pinskerova et al “The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaveric knee: a study using MRI as an anatomic tool” JBJS 82-B, (2000)2. Eckhoff D. et al, Sulcus Morphology of the Distal Femur, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Number 331, pp.23-28, 1996.3. Anderson et al “Patellofemoral complications after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty” JoA 17, 4, 2002.4. Data on file at MicroPort Orthopedics.5. Kujala, U.M., Österman, K., Lormano, M., Nelimarkka, O., Hurme, M., Taimela, S.: Patellofemoral relationships in recurrent patellar dislocation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery71B: 788, 1989.6. Walker PS. Factors affecting the impingement angle of fixed and mobile bearing total knee replacement, a laboratory study. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(5):745-52.7. Karachalios T. A mid-term clinical outcome study of the ADVANCE Medial -Pivot Knee arthroplasty. The Knee, 2009; 16(6): 484-8.8. 2010 Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register.9. Feinstein WK. Anatomic alignment of the patella groove. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 331:64-73.10. Lee TQ. Component positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;336:274-81.11. Stiehl JB. Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(6):706-14.12. Schmidt R, Komistek RD, Blaha JD, Maloney JW Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate-retaining and medial pivot knee implants Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 May;(410):139-47.13. WMT Internal Data.14. Shakespeare D. Flexion after total knee replacement. A comparison between the Medial Pivot knee and a posterior stabilised implant. Knee. 2006 Oct;13(5):371-3. Epub 2006 Jul 715. MicroPort Orthopedics Engineering Report, ER97-0059ADVANCE Medial-Pivot Knee System15

ADVANCE Medial-PivotKinematicsThe goal of any totalknee implant systemis to provide the patient with a long-lasting solution that addressestheir knee pain. However, patient expectations and satisfactionlevels have steadily increased and patients require an option thatmost closely replicates the function of the normal knee. Multiplestudies have characterized the movement of the normal knee,illustrating greater posterior translation of the lateral condyle overthe medial condyle with increasing flexion.1,2 The normal knee hasthe ability to achieve higher ranges of active and passive flexionthan conventional knee implants.3 As such, the need for a longlasting knee system that can achieve normal knee kinematics, isstable throughout the range of motion, and incorporates featuresthat assist in maximizing permissible flexion is desirable.Conventional knee implants have been developed to rely either onsoft tissue or a post and cam mechanism to predictably roll back,providing posterior translation of the femur on the tibia duringflexion. However, many studies have illustrated that the rollbackphenomenon does not occur with many conventional kneedesigns, especially those that incorporate a symmetric tibial insert.These implants illustrate “paradoxical motion,” where the femoralcomponent translates anterior during early stages of flexion,instead of rolling back.3-8 This type of motion has been describedby patients as feeling like “walking on ice”. It is also one of the mai

22. Biomet Surgical Technique for Ascent TKA. 23. Johnson & Johnson, DePuy Surgical Technique for PFC Sigma Rotating Platform TKA. 24. Zimmer Surgical Technique for NexGen TKA. 25. Biomet Surgical Technique for Vanguard TKA. 26. Knee product review, Smith & Nephew, 2006 27. Stryker

Related Documents:

equine medicine b. Food animal or large animal medicine c. Exotic animal medicine d. Marine animal medicine (mammal and fish) e. Poultry medicine f. Wildlife medicine and aquaculture medicine 2. Discuss with your counselor the roles a veterinarian plays in the following: a. Public health medicine and zoonotic disease surveillance and control b .

DEPARTMENT DIVISION NAME Family Medicine Palliative Medicine Algu,Kavita Palliative Medicine Arvanitis,Jennifer Palliative Medicine Berman,Hershl (Hal) Palliative Medicine Buchman,Stephen (Sandy) Palliative Medicine Cellarius,Victor Palliative Medicine Goldman,Russell Palliative Medicine Hashemi,Narges Palliative Medicine Howe,Marnie

Family Medicine Hougas, III, James Ehrling Bergquist Hospital Offutt AFB NE Family Medicine Howard, Sarah Clarkson Family Medicine Residency Omaha NE Family Medicine McNab, Molly Family Medicine Spokane Spokane WA Family Medicine Monson‐Walker, Jeanette Family Medicine Residency of Idaho Boise ID

LIVE SOUND & STUDIO REFERENCES (January 1th 2019) SINGERS ADAGE (Studio)(Duo) SOLLEVILLE Francesca (Live) ALLAM Djamel (Live) SOUCHON Pierre ALLWRIGHT (Graeme Live) SPI et la GAUDRIOLE AXSES (Live) TRISTAN Béa BERGER Laurent (Live) VENDEURS D'ENCLUMES (Les) BERTIN Jacques (Live) VESSIÈRE Yves (Studio) BOBIN (Frédéric (Live) YACOUB Gabriel

University of Baghdad College of Medicine Amna Ali Surgery PG-2 University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine Mehdia Amini Internal Medicine PG-3 St. George's University School of Medicine Miro Asadourian Internal Medicine PG-2 St. George's University School of Medicine Rameen Atefi Internal Medicine PG-1 Touro

2 General Medicine Dr.Sadanand Shetty Professor MD 3 General Medicine Dr.Ananya Mukherji Professor MD 4 General Medicine Dr. Dinesh Chandra Gupta Professor MD 5 General Medicine Dr.Smita Patil Professor MD 6 General Medicine Dr. Santwana Chandrakar Professor MD Department of Medicine Department of Preventive and Social Medicine

University of Arkansas College of Medicine Anesthesiology Baptist Health Madisonville Family Medicine HCA Healthcare/ USF Morsani College of Medicine Family Medicine McLeod Regional Medical Center/Urban Florence Family Medicine Mercy Health Graduate Medical Education Consortium (2) Family Medicine .

P a g e 5 Live Career Assistance Users enter a virtual meeting space and receive live, one-on-one assistance. Live Job Coach: For general career assistance, including a job search, select Live Job Coach under the Career header Live Resume Expert: For resume specific assistance, select Live Resume Expert under the Resume header Live Intervi