Financial And Operational Performance Analysis Of State .

3y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
579.93 KB
8 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Matteo Vollmer
Transcription

Raman and Dr. J. K. Chandel, International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences,ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 03, March 2019, Page 72-79Financial and Operational PerformanceAnalysis of State Cooperative Bank: AStudy of HaryanaRaman1 and Dr. J. K. Chandel21(Ph.D. Scholar, University School of Management, Kurukshetra University, Haryana, India)(Assistant Professor, Institute of Management Studies, Kurukshetra University, Haryana, India)2Abstract: The banking sector in India has faced many turbulences and volatilities due to frequent changes innational and international financial system. In order to meet the requirements of different sections of society,the banking sector is structured accordingly. With more rural and partial semi-urban orientation thecooperative banks have been working in India for more than a century in India. The cooperative banks havebetter reach in rural India through their huge network of credit societies in the institutional credit structure.Being integral, these banks contribute high in the socio-economic development of the country. These haveideological base, economic objects with social outlook and approach. In northern India, the Haryana StateCooperative Apex Bank Ltd. (HARCO Bank) occupies a vital position and specifically in the economy ofHaryana State. It has been financing farmers, rural artisans, agricultural labourers, entrepreneurs, etc. in theState and serving its depositors for decades. From the humble beginning in November 1966, this bank hasgrown into a sound financing institution of outstanding credit worthiness.The present study is an attempt to evaluate the financial and operational performance of HARCOBank. The main objectives of the study are to examine financial performance, operational performance andbankruptcy level of the bank. For this purpose CAMEL model and Z-Score model have been applied besidesother statistical techniques to analyse financial and operational performance of this bank. Through CAMELmodel capital adequacy, asset quality, management efficiency, earning quality and liquidity level are evaluatedand through z-score model bankruptcy level of the bank is evaluated. After identifying the weaknesses throughstudy, significant suggestions have been given.Keywords: Financial Performance, Operational Performance, Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, EarningQuality, Liquidity Position and BankruptcyI. INTRODUCTIONThe finance is the life and blood of trade, commerce and industry and now it has become the backboneof modern business. No business can survive without the services of banks. There was a need of a regulator inbanking sector in India due to the failures of hundreds of banks before independence. The RBI (as regulator)was conceptualized as per the guidelines, working style and outlook presented by greatest Indian economistBharat Ratna Dr.B.R. Ambedkar in front of the Hilton Young Commission. The Commission members foundDr. Ambedkar’s book ‘The Problem of the Rupee- Its origin and Solution’ an invaluable reference tool and theCentral Legislative Assembly eventually passed these guidelines as the RBI Act 1934. The RBI initiallyfocussed on rural and agriculture sector considering India as an agrarian economy through its Agri-creditdepartment. However, Cooperative Societies Act 1904 was already in existence at that time and someamendments were also made in that Act with passage of time. Since then the cooperative banking sector hasbeen playing vital role in Indian economy. Being imperative constituent in Indian banking structure, thecooperative banks have better reach to the rural India, through their huge network of branches, credit societies inthe institutional credit structure. These have ideological base, economic objects with social outlook andapproach. The state cooperative banks work at top (state level) of three tier structure of rural cooperative creditInstitutions. These banks (now 29 in number) finance, co-ordinate and control the working of the central cooperative banks in each state. They serve as the link between the Reserve bank and the general money market onthe one side and the central co-operative and primary societies on the other. They obtain funds mainly from thegeneral public by way of deposits, loans and advances from the Reserve Bank and they are own share capitaland reserves.The Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd. (HARCO Bank) occupies a vital position in theeconomy of Haryana state in India and has been financing farmers, rural artisans, agricultural labourers,entrepreneurs, etc. and serving its depositors since November 1966. It has 13 branches and 2 extensionscounters, with 19 central cooperative banks with their 594 branches working in the length and breadth of thestate. The aggregate share capital of HARCO bank stood at Rs. 137.99crore as on 31 March 2016 as against Rs.132.61crore as on 31 March 2015, indicating an increase of 3 per cent. The deposits of HARCO bank athttp://indusedu.orgThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicensePage 72

Raman and Dr. J. K. Chandel, International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences,ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 03, March 2019, Page 72-79Rs.3104.91 crore as on 31 March 2016 as against Rs. 2179.55crore as on 31 March 2015, generating a growth ofnineteen percent. The borrowings outstanding of HARCO bank as on 31 March 2016 was Rs. 4025.27 crore, asagainst Rs.4425.04 crore as on 31 March 2015. The loans issued of HARCO bank Rs. 7608.07 as on 31 March2016 as against Rs. 6748.60 as on 31 March 2015. The loan outstanding of HARCO bank was Rs. 6318.60crore as on 31 March 2016, indicating an increase of 3.45 per cent, over past year.II. REVIEW OF LITERATUREMany theoretical and empirical Studies have been under-taken to assess the role of state cooperativebank in Haryana. Prominent among them are: Kanagasabai (1984) made an attempt to study the determinantsof profitability and for this State Cooperative Bank (SCB) facing declining profitability was selected. For thisthe parameters, viz. Short-term loans to total loans, time deposits to total deposits, borrowing to owned fundswere taken for a time period of 1970-71 to 1979-80. It was analysed whether agriculture advances, proportion oftime deposits to total deposits and level of borrowings affect the profitability of the bank or not. It was foundthat these factors affect positively the profits of the bank. So, it was suggested that the bank should designsuitable strategies to improve these ratios in order to increase the profitability. Dayanandan and Kumar (1993)made an attempt to evaluate the performance of Central Cooperative Banks (CCBs) in Kerala on the basis oftheir progress in membership, share capital, deposits, reserve funds, loans overdue and net profit earned. Toanalyse the growth rate, trend values were calculated on the basis of three year moving averages. It was foundthat the CCBs have achieved better performance in share capital, membership, deposits and reserve fund butthere is no achievement in net profit because of steady. Verma (1992) analysed the effectiveness of agriculturalcredit by cooperative credit institutions in Nagari block of Chittoor district in Andhra Pradesh. It was found thatthere is large amount of overdue of loans and the major defaulters are medium level farmers. Lack of propersupervision of end use of loans, inadequate amount of credit sanctioned and the natural calamities like droughtare some of the reason of overdue. It was suggested that small and marginal farmers should be involved; theprocedure of sanctioning loans should be simplified; and proper supervision on the end use of credit should bemade.Rao (1998) examined the challenges and opportunities thrown due to the introduction of financialsector reforms in cooperative banks. It was analysed that this change can create turbulence in the short run, butthe opportunity will provide real diversification of business. It was suggested that certain reforms in internalframework (i.e. improving operational efficiencies, cost effectiveness, etc.) and external framework (functionalautonomy, professionalism) are required to meet the challenges and opportunities put forward by financialsector reforms. Chander and Chandel (2010) examined the financial viability, efficiency and performance offour DCCBs operating in Gurgaon division in Haryana (India), viz. Gurgaon, Faridabad, Mahendergarh andRewari for a period of twelve years (1997-98 to 2008-09) by financial analysis and z-score analysis. Thefinancial parameters taken were profitability, liquidity, efficiency, solvency, risk and bankruptcy. The resultsrevealed that four DCCBs with approximately fifty branches have not been performing well on all financialparameters taken for study. The banks performed well on one parameter but deteriorated on another and indifferent years as well. All the banks were a part of bankruptcy zone (weak performance zone) throughout thestudy period. The banks were needed to visualize their operations, policies and strategies for effective utilizationof available financial and human resources. They recommended that the banks should amend their vision and actaccordingly for sustenance in fierce competitive financial environment. Pathak, Soni and Bhati (2011)compared cooperative banks with nationalized banks on five parameters, viz. ease of deposit, ease ofwithdrawal, customer relations, reliability of bank, and ease of location with a sample size of 100 customers asrespondents having accounts both in a nationalized bank and a cooperative bank. They found that cooperativebanks fared better in ease of deposit & customer relations. On the other hand nationalized banks fared better inease of withdrawal & reliability. While on location advantage, no significant difference has been found.Objectives of the StudyThe study under consideration proposes to achieve the following objectives:i)To study and examine the financial performance of the Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd.(HARCO Bank)ii)To scan and analyse the operational performance of the Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd.iii)To inspect into the viability/bankruptcy level of Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd.III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGYA. Type of Research and Data CollectionThe present study is analytical and descriptive in nature. The data has been collected from secondarysources, i.e. Annual Financial Statements of the Bank, Research Journals, Financial Reports, Reports publishedby Government, e-newspapers etc. The data has been taken for eight years i.e. from 2009-2010 to 2016-2017.http://indusedu.orgThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicensePage 73

Raman and Dr. J. K. Chandel, International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences,ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 03, March 2019, Page 72-79B. Hypothesis of the studyH01: There is no significant difference in the financial performance of HARCO bank during the studyperiod.H02: There is no significant difference in the operational efficiency of HARCO bank during the studyperiodH03: There is no significant difference in the bankruptcy level of HARCO bank during the study period.C. Statistical Tools and TechniquesThe CAMEL Model and Z-Score model have been applied besides ratio analysis and statisticaltechniques like- t-test and ANOVA.a) Ratios to measure profitability Return on Capital EmployedNPAT 100 (Wherein, NPAT Net Profit after tax, TA Total Assets)TANP 100 (wherein, NP Net Profit, TI Total Income)Profit Margin PM TIROCE b) Ratios to measure current obligation c)C 100 (wherein, C Cash, TA Total Assets)TAC 100 (wherein, C Cash, TD Total Deposit)Cash-Deposit ratio– CDR TDCAR Cash-Assets ratio–Ratios to measure solvencyOutside Liabilities to Total Assets– TB 100 (Wherein, TB Total Borrowings, TA Total Assets)TAPBIT 100 (wherein, PBIT ProfitInterest coverage ratio or debt service ratio ICR TIEOLTA before Interest and Taxes, TIE Total Interest Expenditures)d) Ratios to measure efficiency Operating Efficiency Ratio OER TOE 100 (wherein, TOE Total Operating Expenses,TATA Total Assets) Borrowings)Ratios to measure risk Equity Assets Ratio f)Sr. No.13COF e) 2Cost of funds TIE 100TB(wherein, TIE Total Interest Expenses, TB TotalTE 100 (wherein, TE Total Equity, TA Total Assets)TANNPA 100 (wherein, NNPA Net Non Performing Assets, S Sales)NNPA to Sales– NNPS SEAR CAMEL ModelThe composite ratings are assigned in the model in terms of 1-5 numerics. The number 1 indicates thehighest rating, strongest performance, least degree of supervision concern, and sound health, while 5indicates lowest rating, inadequate performance and weak health of bank and so receiving highestdegree of supervisory concern.Table: C.f.CAMEL Model – Efficiency ParametersEfficiency ParametersMeasurement Ratios Rating (on a five point scale)Capital AdequacyRisk weighted5 1-5, 4 6-10, 3 11-15, 2 16-20, 1 morecapital to Assetsthan 20Asset QualityNPA to Advances5 more than 11, 4 8-10, 3 5-7, 2 2 - 4, 1 less than 1ManagementNet Profit per5 less than 1, 4 1 - 2, 3 2 - 3, 2 3 - 4, 1 Employeemore than 4http://indusedu.orgThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicensePage 74

Raman and Dr. J. K. Chandel, International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences,ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 03, March 2019, Page 72-794Earning QualityReturn on Assets5Liquidity PositionCash to Depositg)5 0-0.5, 4 0.6-1.0, 3 1.1-1.5, 2 1.6-2.0, 1 more than 2.05 less than 5, 4 7 - 9, 3 10-12, 2 13-15, 1 more than 15Altman Z-Score ModelThe model is defined as: Z 0.012X1 0.014X2 0.33X3 0.006X4 0.999X5, Wherein, the variablesX1 to X4 are computed as absolute percentage values while X5 is obtained in number of times andsignify as: X1 is the ratio of working capital to total assets, X2 is the ratio of retained earnings to totalassets, X3 is the ratio of earnings before interest and tax to total assets, X 4 is the ratio of market value ofequity to book value of debt, X5 is the ratio of sales to total assets. The model discriminate threecategories in relation to the financial performance as given below:CategoryZ-score valueInference/ImplicationsiBelow 1.8Bankruptcy zoneii1.8 – 3.0Good PerformanceiiiAbove 3.0Very Healthy PerformanceIV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe Haryana state cooperative (HARCO) bank ltd. has been playing pivotal role in the ruraldevelopment of Haryana since its inception. A detailed discussion is made on the analysis of financial andoperational performance of the bank in the following section.A. Financial Performance Analysis of HARCO bankThe financial performance of the bank has been evaluated considering profitability, liquidity, solvency,efficiency and risk ratios as discussed below.Table: V.A. Financial Performance of HARCO Bank (Year 2009-17)EfficiencyMeasureRiskProfitability Ratio Liquidity RatioSolvency RatioRatioRatioROCEPMCARCDROLTA ICROER 3 9.7110.180.071020100.0991.833.157.650.062.341.01 8.458.930.061120110.3075.723.349.556.087.261.14 7.567.840.051220120.457.61.454.0555.219.211.04 8.987.460.051320130.335.371.695.459.686.410.99 8.77.810.051420140.223.972.127.0761.074.680.85 499.120.041620160.356.323.318.0847.127.610.94 9.778.150.04170.2043753.012 4.2837 0.92 8.8112Mean53.452.58425 6.877555758.3850.051250.26865 5.09146 0.84895 021 (8.77)(0.0019 (2.98)(0.00116.6 (0.002(8.83)))3)(6.91 5)-19.8)(2.07)(Source: Calculated from Financial Reports of Harco Bank)It is construed from the above table V.A. that two ratios each have been taken under five financialparameters, i.e. Profitability, Liquidity, Solvency, Efficiency and Risk and inferred as belowi. Profitability AnalysisProfits are a measure of creditworthiness or worth of investment for owners, source of fringe benefitsfor employees and a measure of tax-paying capacity for Government. Profit earning is essential for the survivalof all banks. However, RRBs are not meant for profit earning yet they can make their operations properly andhttp://indusedu.orgThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicensePage 75

Raman and Dr. J. K. Chandel, International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences,ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 03, March 2019, Page 72-79discharge their obligations to different segments of the society only through earnings or profits. For ProfitabilityAnalysis two ratios have been considered, i.e. Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) and Net Profit Margin (PM)ratio. There is declining trend in ROCE and PM during the study period with mean value 0.204 and 3.45respectively. The standard deviation in both the cases is 0.26 and 5.09. The declining and lower ratio signifiesthat bank is deficient in utilizing the total investments made in fixed/current assets and generating lesser returns.There is no significant difference in ROCE as t-value was -13.64 (sig. 2.68) but there was significant differencein PM with t-value -4.74 (sig 0.0021) during the study period.ii. Liquidity AnalysisLiquidity refers to the ability of a concern to meet its current obligations as and when these becomedue. The Cash Asset Ratio (CAR) reflects the liquidity level against the asset base of the bank and higher ratio isconsidered better. The average CAR was 2.58 and CDR was 6.87 which prove that liquidity position of PGBwas poor and standard deviation was low, i.e. 0.84 and 1.82 which signifies that most of the ratios are very closeto the average or clustered closely around the mean. There is no significant difference in CAR as t-value was 8.04 (sig. 8.77) but there was significant difference in CDR with t-value -4.82 (sig 0.0019) during the studyperiod. Lower ratios (liquidity) may impact the creditworthiness and payment capacity negatively meaningthereby the bank may face problem of timely payment to the depositors due to shortage of cash which ultimatelymay adversely affect the creditworthiness and profitability.iii. Solvency AnalysisThe ‘solvency’ is the ability of a bank to meet its long term obligations, so, solvency ratios indicate abank’s ability to meet the fixed interest, costs and repayment schedules associated with its long termborrowings. The average OLTA ratio for HARCO bank was 53.01 maintained but the banks with higher ratioshould try to lower down this ratio for better solvency condition. The Standard deviation in the ratio was 5.89and t-value was 13.43(sig. 2.89) which prove no significant difference in the calculated ratios. The averageInterest coverage ratio (ICR) or debt service ratio was 4.28 it indicates these ratios are very low which isalarming for bank to revive. There must be sufficient amount/percentage of profits to pay for interest to thecreditors/depositors otherwise may impact the creditworthiness negatively. The Standard deviation in the ratiowas 5.91 and the t-value -5.12 (0.0013) and was significant difference at 0.05 level.iv. Efficiency AnalysisThe efficiency ratios measure the effectiveness with which funds are utilized in the business, how wellthe institution controls expenses relative to producing revenues, and how productive employees are in terms ofgenerating income, managing assets and handling operations. The lesser the proportion of operating expenditureto total assets, the better is for the bank as more profit will be available to meet other expenditures andultimately more earnings will be available in the hands of owners. In case of the OER ratio was lesser its showsthat bank as more profit will be available to meet other expe

The Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd. (HARCO Bank) occupies a vital position in the economy of Haryana state in India and has been financing farmers, rural artisans, agricultural labourers, entrepreneurs, etc. and serving its depositors since November 1966. It has 13 branches and 2 extensions

Related Documents:

Research Design: Financial Performance Analysis In this study, financial performance analysis will be used. The analysis is based on three types of analysis methods which are horizontal analysis, trend analysis and ratio analysis. All data analysis is based on the items on the financial statement. A financial statement is a written record

Performance Management Framework . Operational Planning . Toolkit . The Financial and Performance Management Standard 2019 (FPMS) (section ) requires each accountable officer and 8 statutory body to develop operational plans for relevant business areas, or an operational plan for the whole agency to

Financial Empowerment 2 Financial education –strategy that provides people with financial knowledge, skills and resources Financial education builds an individual’s knowledge, skills and capacity to use resources and tools, including financial products and services leading to Financial Literacy Financial empowerment includes financial education and financial literacy –focuses .

Qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, non-financial indicator analysis, financial indicator analysis, internal performance analysis, external performance analysis, project-orientated analysis, organization-orientated analysis 8 [36] Area-based Knowledge measurement in products and processes,

(a) Vertical Analysis. (b) Horizontal Analysis. A Textbook of Financial Cost and Management Accounting The following chart shows the classification of financial analysis: Financial Statement Analysis ! On the Basis of Materials Used External Analysis ! 1 Internal Analysis ! 1 On the Basis of Modus Operandi Horizontal Analysis ! 1 Vertical .

Operations as part of Operational Excellence Operational Sustainability, LLC The overall objective of Conduct of Operations (CoO) is to structure operational tasks in a manner consistent with the organization's risk tolerance to ensure that every task is completed in a way that minimizes variations in performance. In other words, ensuring that

Financial ratio analysis is an analysis of a company's financial statements, and it is vital for identifying negative and positive trends of a business over time. This article sets out to provide a detailed analysis of the financial performance of J Sainsbury plcand compare it with the performance of Tesco and Morri-sons.

Financial analysis is also critical in evaluating the relative stability of revenues and earnings, the levels of operating and financial risk, and the performance of management. Common size financial statements are an important tool in financial statement analysis. This Chapter