NATO STANDARD AAP-20 - SSB
NATO STANDARDAAP-20NATO PROGRAMME MANAGEMENTFRAMEWORK(NATO Life Cycle Model)Edition C Version 1October 2015NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATIONALLIED ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLICATIONPublished by theNATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) NATO/OTAN
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO)NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO)NATO LETTER OF PROMULGATION16 October 20151.The enclosed Allied Administrative Publication AAP-20, Edition C, Version 1, NATOProgramme Management Framework (NATO Life Cycle Model), which has been approvedby the nations in the Life Cycle Management Group (AC/327), is promulgated herewith. Theagreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 4728 .2.AAP-20 Edition C, Version 1 is effective upon receipt. and supersedes AAP-20,Edition 2, Version 1 which shall be destroyed in accordance with the local procedure for thedestruction of documents.No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used3.commercially, adapted, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photo-copying , recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Withthe exception of commercial sales, this does not apply to member or partner nations, orNATO commands and bodies.4.This publication shall be handled in accordance with C-M(2002)60.Edvardas MAZEIKISMajor General, LTUAFDirector, NATO Standardization Office
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
AAP-20RESERVED FOR NATIONAL LETTER OF PROMULGATIONIEdition C Version 1
AAP-20INTENTIONALLY BLANKIIEdition C Version 1
AAP-20RECORD OF RESERVATIONSCHAPTERRECORD OF RESERVATION BY NATIONSNote: The reservations listed on this page include only those that were recorded at time ofpromulgation and may not be complete. Refer to the NATO Standardization DocumentDatabase for the complete list of existing reservations.IIIEdition C Version 1
AAP-20INTENTIONALLY BLANKIVEdition C Version 1
AAP-20RECORD OF SPECIFIC RESERVATIONS[nation][detail of reservation]Note: The reservations listed on this page include only those that were recorded at time ofpromulgation and may not be complete. Refer to the NATO Standardization DocumentDatabase for the complete list of existing reservations.VEdition C Version 1
AAP-20VIEdition C Version 1
AAP-20INTENTIONALLY BLANKVIIEdition C Version 1
AAP-20TABLE OF 4.3.4.4.OVERVIEW . 1INTRODUCTION . 1PURPOSE . 2APPLICABILITY . 2REFERENCED DOCUMENTS . 2APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS . 3TERMS AND DEFINITIONS . 4ACRONYMS . 4INTRODUCTION TO LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT . 5BACKGROUND INFORMATION . 5SYSTEM CONCEPT . 7MATURITY CONCEPT . 8AAP-20 AT A GLANCE. 9DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAMME STAGES . 12GENERAL . 12PRE-CONCEPT STAGE . 14CONCEPT STAGE . 17DEVELOPMENT STAGE . 23PRODUCTION STAGE. 26UTILISATION STAGE . 29SUPPORT STAGE . 30RETIREMENT STAGE . 33ACCELERATED FIELDING . 36FAST TRACKING. 36MULTI-STAGE DECISIONS. 37OFF-THE-SHELF PRODUCTS . 37TECHNOLOGY INSERTION (TI). 39ANNEX 1: Big Picture of the Life Cycle Framework . 1ANNEX 2: Primary Stakeholders for NATO Programmes . 1ANNEX 3: Modification and upgrade procedure within the utilisation and support stages . 1ANNEX 4: Glossary . 1ANNEX 5: Acronyms . 1ANNEX 6: Project Management Concept. 1ANNEX 7: AAP-20 decision documents (stage approval) . 1VIIIEdition C Version 1
AAP-20Figure 1: NATO Life Cycle Management Document Framework . 1Figure 2: Relationship between NATO Programme, System-of-Interest and MilitaryCapability . 6Figure 3: System Concept . 7Figure 4: Relationship between Operational Maturity and System Maturity . 8Figure 5: Structured Approach in the Execution of a Programme . 9Figure 6: AAP-20 at a Glance . 11Figure 7: Programme Stage Elements . 12Figure 8: Decision Gate . 13Figure 9: Use of Entry and Exit Criteria. 14Figure 10: Pre-Concept Stage . 16Figure 11: Concept Stage . 21Figure 12: Development Stage . 25Figure 13: Production Stage . 28Figure 14: Utilisation Stage . 30Figure 15: Support Stage . 32Figure 16: Retirement Stage . 35Figure 17: Multi-Stage Decisions . 37Figure 18: AAP-20 Process versus Off-the-shelf . 38Figure 19: Modification and Upgrade Procedure .Annex 3Figure 20: Modification and Upgrade Procedure Overview .Annex 3IXEdition C Version 1
AAP-20OVERVIEW1.1.IntroductionIn order to reach their operational goals, NATO/Nations/Agencies develop strategicobjectives that are realized by single or multiple capabilities. Capabilities are realized bysingle or multiple programmes, and programmes are realized by single or multiple projects.A programme is undertaken to develop a system, product, or a service that feeds into thisframework. Ongoing organisational activities/processes are aligned to support the needs ofthe programme.As described in the NATO Policy for Systems Life Cycle Management (SLCM), the aim ofSLCM is to optimise defence capabilities over the life cycle of the system by taking intoaccount performance, cost, schedule, quality, operational environments, integrated logisticsupport, and obsolescence. It facilitates interoperability, communication, collaboration, andcooperation, while minimising total life cycle cost. Annex 1 shows the big picture of the LifeCycle Framework.AAP-20 is a generic guidance document which provides the standardized and tailorableapproach for managing programmes that includes materiel solutions and should be used inconjunction with AAP-48 and the SLCM document Library. AAP-48 defines the NATOSystem Life Cycle Management processes. The SLCM document library containsprocedures, templates, handbooks, and other documents. The logical NATO System LifeCycle Management Document Framework is shown in Figure 1: NATO Life CycleManagement Document Framework.Figure 1: NATO Life Cycle Management Document Framework1Edition C Version 1
AAP-201.2.PurposeAAP-20 is a generic guidance document that provides the standardized and tailorableapproach for managing programmes by NATO, Agencies, Groups of Nations and Nation(s).It delivers a structured approach to describe the stages and to aid decision-making at thesedecision points for all management levels involved in cooperative programmes.This document focuses on the formulation of requirements based on a capability gap andthe management of a programme throughout the life cycle, including accelerated fielding(rapid acquisition) and technology insertion. It provides potential pitfalls, risks, andopportunities for managing a programme based on the best practices of NATO Nations andhelps clarify the roles of the National and NATO Authorities and the International Staff in thedecision process.AAP-20 expects close cooperation between operational commands, military planners, andprogramme managers. Stakeholder requirements will be provided by military planners toprogramme managers based on capability gaps and strategic objectives.1.3.ApplicabilityNations are encouraged to use this publication as a guide and therefore, AAP-20 intends tosupport and complement national acquisition policies, not replace them. The use of AAP20 in NATO, Multinational and National Programmes as an enabling framework will lead toa more effective and efficient provision of capabilities.With the necessity to describe interfaces and relationships to other processes and domains,it was necessary to use the NATO processes and domains to show the dependencies.Nations, Agencies, and other Users of this guideline should adjust these interfaces to theirappropriate processes and domains.1.4.Referenced DocumentsNATO Policy for Systems Life Cycle ManagementC-M-(2005)0108Proposed General Principles and Guidelines for NATO PFP(CNAD)D(2009)0009 datedMultinational Programmes29 September 2009.NATO System Life Cycle ProcessesGuidance ManualArrangementsforCooperativeAAP-48Programme AACP-01Guidelines on Contractual Terms for Feasibility Study AACP-02WorkOther Allied Publications (APs) Relating to Guidance and See NATO StandardisationProcedures in International ProgrammesDocument Database (NSDD)Allied Life Cycle Cost PublicationALCCP-1Systems and software engineering – System life cycle ISO/IEC 15288processes2Edition C Version 1
AAP-201.5.Applicable DocumentsThese documents are not specifically referenced in the AAP-20, but may be useful inexecuting a successful NATO Programme. AAP-48 contains all other related documents.Systems and Software Engineering, Life Cycle ISO/IEC TR 24748-2:2011Management, Guide to the Application of ISO/IEC 15288(System Life Cycle Processes)Systems and Software Engineering,Processes, Project ManagementLifeCycle ISO/IEC 16326:2009A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, ANSI/PMI4Third Edition – PMBOK Guide, Project ManagementInstitute (PMI) Standards nter-Committees C-M(2009)0145The NATO Policy for StandardizationC-M(2010)0063NATO Guidance on the Use of AQAP 160 Ed.1AQAP 169NATO Policy on an Integrated Systems Approach to AQAP 2000Quality through the Life CycleNATO Guidance on the Use of the AQAP 2000 SeriesAQAP 2009NATO Project Assessment ModelAQAP 2050NATO Mutual Government Quality Assurance (GQA) AQAP 2070ProcessNATO Requirements for Deliverable Quality PlansAQAP 2105NATO Quality Assurance Requirements for Design, AQAP 2110Development and ProductionNATO Quality Assurance Requirements for ProductionAQAP 2120NATO Quality Assurance Requirements for Inspection AQAP 2130and TestNATO QualityInspectionAssuranceRequirements forFinal AQAP 2131NATO Supplementary Software Quality Assurance AQAP 2210Requirements to AQAP 2110Obsolescence Management - Application guideConfigurationManagementManagementinQuality Management SystemsConfiguration ManagementSystem-LifeEN 62402:2007Cycle STANAG 4427Guidelinesfor ISO 10007NATO Guidance on Integrated Logistics Support for ALP-10Multinational Armament Projects (ILS)Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS)STANAG 46613Edition C Version 1
AAP-201.6.Terms and DefinitionsA list of terms and definitions used in this document is provided in Annex 4.1.7.AcronymsA list of acronyms used in this document is provided in Annex 5.4Edition C Version 1
AAP-20Introduction to Life Cycle Management2.1.Background InformationThe NATO, Nations or group of Nations need capabilities to meet their strategic objectives.The NATO objectives are documented in the Strategic Concept for the Defence and Securityof the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. In order to maintain the capabilityto constantly satisfy these strategic objectives, it is continuously necessary to find newsolutions.The main objective of a programme is to deliver the required capabilities to fill identified gapswith a materiel solution. In order to fill these gaps, it is necessary to define a solution andbuild up an Operational System. This means that the System must reach a certain status ofmaturity in order to operate and perform the needed capability.The integration of the necessary capability components (Doctrine, Organisation, Training,Material, Leadership Development, Personnel, Facilities, and Interoperability) is a joint effortbetween Nations, NATO, and collaborative work with other stakeholders utilising a widevariety of tools. A programme may be comprised of several Systems, with each Systempotentially being realised by one or more projects.Basic inputs to a NATO Programme are:-Required Military Capabilities (Stakeholder Requirements), provided by MilitaryPlanners-Resources and decisions provided by Nations and NATO AuthoritiesIn many cases a major building block of programmes is the materiel component in the formof one or more Systems of Interest and available Capability Packages as shown in Figure2. To support the management and to aid decision making during the execution of theprogramme, a structured approach should be divided into stages. Each stage representsone essential period of the life cycle of the programme and the system.The partitioning of the programme and system life cycle into stages is based on thepracticality of doing the work in small, understandable, and timely steps. In addition, stageshelp to identify uncertainties and risk associated with cost, schedule, general objectives, anddecision making. Each stage has a distinct purpose and contribution to the whole life cycle.The transition between stages uses decision gates and entry/exit criteria in addition tomilestones within stages to ensure the programme is progressing successfully.A programme can be managed using a variety of methods and tools, one of the mostimportant being Project Management (see Annex 5 for additional project managementconsiderations). Project Management can be used wherever useful within the managementof each stage, as well as for definition of requirements, establishment of a programmeMemorandum of Understanding (MOU), or production of a specific component within aSystem-of-Interest (SOI). While Project Management focuses on the overall execution of aproject, systems engineering facilitates the technical aspects.Life Cycle Management describes how a SOI and enabling systems are managedthroughout its life cycle using the methods of Programme Management, ProjectManagement.The integration of all necessary SOI and enabling systems at the end of production stage,including Capability Packages, if applicable, result in the delivered or fielded MilitaryCapability.5Edition C Version 1
AAP-20Figure 2: Relationship between NATO Programme, System-of-Interest and MilitaryCapability6Edition C Version 1
AAP-202.2.System ConceptThe system concept for AAP-20 defines a system as a System-of-Interest (SOI) and allEnabling Systems (enablers) related to the SOI. This system concept differs from themanagement of the life of a product within the customer organization (asset tracking,configuration management, etc.), that is an integral part of the tasks to reach and maintainthe maturity during the Systems Life Cycle.ISO/IEC 15288 provides an additional system concept and structure with a principal view onindustrial needs. This system concept must also be seen as an integral part of the systemconcept for AAP-20.The System-of-Interest (SOI) consists of the sum of subsystems, main components,components (assemblies), and parts to meet a specific and defined purpose asdistinguished from other systems1. Their essential properties arise from the relationshipsbetween the elements. The subsystems, components, and parts are able to be directly orindirectly dependent on each other and/or be linked and/or interact with
Requirements to AQAP 2110 AQAP 2210 Obsolescence Management - Application guide EN 62402:2007 Configuration Management in System Life Cycle Management STANAG 4427 Quality Management Systems - Guidelines for Configuration Management ISO 10007 NATO Guidance on Integrated Logistics Support for .
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION NATO STANDARDIZATION AGENCY (NSA) NATO LETTER OF PROMULGATION 03 April 2013 1. AAP-06(2013)-NATO GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS (ENGLISH AND FRENCH) is a NATO Allied publication. The agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 3680. 2. AAP-06(2013) is effective upon receipt.
pop marson star celus cherry gesipa ada32 aba32 ad32abs ab3-2a - a/a32d aap-32 gamd32a ada34 aba34 ad34abs ab3-4a - a/a34d aap-34 gamd34a ada41 aba41 ad41abs ab4-1a 4-1aad a/a41d aap-41 gamd41a ada42 aba42 ad42abs ab4-2a 4-2aad a/a42d aap-42 gamd42a ada43 aba43 ad43abs ab4-3a 4-3aad a/a43d aap-43 gamd43a
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO) NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) NATO LETTER OF PROMULGATION 4 October 2019 1. The enclosed Allied Quality Assurance Publication AQAP-2070, Edition B, Version 4 NATO MUTUAL GOVERNMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE (GQA), which has been approved by the nations in AC/327, is promulgated herewith.
NCS is comprised of US National Stock Numbers and NATO Stock Numbers NATO codification is based on U.S. Federal Catalog System Currently there are more than 18 million NSNs NATO-wide Used by 62 nations around the world, including 28 NATO countries (to find a list of the 28 NATO participating countries please follow)
74 BAB III GAMBARAN UMUM NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Dalam bab ini penulis akan menjelaskan beberapa pembahasan, Pertama penulis akan menjelaskan profil North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). dalam bab ini akan dijelaskan sejarah terbentuknya NATO, alasan negara-negara Eropa untuk membentuk aliansi, struktur NATO dan cara kerja struktur dalam NATO.
AAP-48 1-1 Edition B Version 1 CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW 1. Today the NATO emphasis is on the provision of military capability, to which armament systems and equipment contribute the
Publications (English and French) is a NATO Allied administrative publication. 2. AAP-15(2013) terminology has been . exemplified by the Concise Oxford English Dictionary and Le Petit Robert, which will be recorded in Change 1 to C-M(2005)0023. C. 15. This edition of AAP-15 conforms with the Guidance. Where there are several
Here's a solution - SSB power increase MOD, born after long hours spent on examining schematic diagrams, comparing circuit details and ham radio cooperation. Likewise as in IC-7100 low SSB power ( but not only SSB - i.e FSK441 and JT6M also are affected) it's the problem of too sharp ALC limiting, making the ALC loop acting too fast
