Management And Performance PERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNING

3y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
1.64 MB
169 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Dani Mulvey
Transcription

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGThe following pages represent NASA’s combined Annual Performance Report and Annual PerformancePlan. The combined report shows up to six years of historical performance alongside two years of futureplans. In addition, the combined report is aligned with NASA’s 2014 Strategic Plan. Many details onNASA’s new strategic goals and strategic objectives are available in the 2014 Strategic Plan and notrepeated here. The focus of the combined report is on recent performance from the last fiscal year andplans for the next two years.Presenting the Annual Performance Report and Annual Performance Plan information together allows aunique opportunity to see the trend across multiple years within a program and the tie between multi-yearperformance goals and the annual components of these. Multi-year performance trends are incorporatedinto the FY 2015 Performance Plan, starting with the currently reported year of FY 2013 and spanningbackward for up to five years. NASA’s method for trending multi-year performance data is to show thelinkages between measures tracking similar data and annual progress for follow-on program activities.Linked measures, even if revised in subsequent years, are shown as related performance data. They arenot meant to show back data for measures written exactly the same. In some cases, measures have beenupdated over the years to improve accuracy and data quality.For detailed information on performance ratings and measures from FY 2008 to FY 2012, go tohttp://www.nasa.gov/about/budget/PAR Reports.html.The combined report is organized by strategic goal, followed by an overview of each strategic objective.NASA summarizes FY 2013 performance for each multi-year performance goal, and whether there isplanned performance against these in FY 2014 and/or FY 2015. The performance goal summary isfollowed by: The annual performance indicators associated with the performance goal;The FY 2013 ratings for the performance goal, its supporting annual performance indicators, andthe performance measures for the past five fiscal years (if applicable);The Annual Performance Plan for FY 2014 and FY 2015; andIf an FY 2013 annual performance indicator was not met, an explanation for why performancewas less than planned and plans for improvement.Because NASA’s plans for FY 2014 and FY 2015 are aligned to the 2014 Strategic Plan, manyperformance goals and annual performance indicators from the 2011 Strategic Plan do not carry forward.After Strategic Goal 3, NASA lists the FY 2013 performance for performance goals and annualperformance indicators that are retired with the old Strategic Plan in a subsection called, “Retired FY2013 Measures: Reported Performance.”Figure 8 is an annotated sample from the combined Annual Performance Report and Annual PerformancePlan.MP-29

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGFigure 8: Annual Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report SampleFY 2014 and FY 2015performance goal numberand descriptionMulti-year Performance GoalFY 2015 and FY 2014 1.2.3: By FY 2018, replace aging Deep Space Network (DSN) 70-meter antennaat Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex (CDSCC).FY 2013 5.4.3.3: By FY 2018, replace aging and obsolete Deep Space Network (DSN) 70-meterantenna at Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex (CDSCC).Performance goalFY 2013 number, in the previouscurrent and pastPerformance Trending:strategy and performance framework,ratingsand descriptionFY 2011FY 2012FY n of performancegoal and its ratingFY 2013 Performance Goal Progress SummaryDSN is an international network of antennas that supports interplanetary spacecraft missions, space-basedtelescopes, and some selected Earth-orbiting science missions. To meet ongoing demand for deep spacecommunication services, it is replacing its aging Deep Space Station (DSS) 70-meter antennas with a newgeneration of 34-meter antennas. NASA completed the structural development of the pedestal andantenna structure at Canberra in 2013. With the structure complete, NASA will focus on the developmentand delivery of the electronic systems.Annual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Space and Flight SupportContributing Program(s): Space Communications and NavigationFY 2013, FY 2014, and FY2015 API number anddescriptionFY 2015 SFS-15-7: Complete the antenna structure at Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex(CDSCC) for Deep Space Station (DSS)-46.FY 2014 SFS-14-6: Complete the radio frequency equipment installation at Canberra Deep SpaceCommunications Complex (CDSCC) to support operations.FY 2013 SFS-13-6: Complete antenna structure for DSS-35 at the CDSCC.API ratings for FY 2013and past five fiscal yearsPerformance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011SFS-11-7GreenFY 2012SFS-12-7GreenFY 2013SFS-13-6GreenMP-30

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGStrategic Goal 1: Expand the frontiers of knowledge,capability, and opportunity in space.STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1.1: EXPAND HUMAN PRESENCE INTO THE SOLAR SYSTEMAND TO THE SURFACE OF MARS TO ADVANCE EXPLORATION, SCIENCE,INNOVATION, BENEFITS TO HUMANITY, AND INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION.Strategies and Next StepsNASA’s 2014 Strategic Plan discusses the strategy for achieving this strategic objective.As part of performance planning, NASA has established next steps for Strategic Objective 1.1, near-termmilestones that set the foundation for achievement of this objective. For FY 2014, NASA will: Obtain Agency approval to proceed with the Space Launch System (SLS) final design andfabrication;Complete the SLS core stage Critical Design Review, giving the project teams permission tobegin final design and fabrication of the core stage;Complete the Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) Preliminary Design Review (PDR). At PDR,NASA will establish the technical design, cost, and schedule baseline for completing EGS, aneffort that will transform Kennedy Space Center’s spaceflight facilities into the complex neededto support SLS/Orion missions; andComplete Orion manufacturing and assembly so the spacecraft is ready for launch vehicleintegration for Exploration Flight Test (EFT)-1 in 2014. EFT-1 will be comprised of an uncrewedOrion flight test vehicle, the launch abort system, service module, spacecraft adaptor and fairings,and Orion-to-stage adaptor. It will launch aboard a Delta IV Heavy rocket, reaching an altitude of3,600 miles above Earth’s surface (much higher than the International Space Station’s orbit),orbit approximately twice, and splash down in the Pacific. EFT-1 will test onboard systems andthe heat shield and will give the design and operation teams important experience in design,assembly, and preparation for the Orion launch aboard SLS.Strategic Objective Leader: Greg Williams, Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Plans,Human Exploration and Operations Mission DirectorateMulti-year Performance GoalFY 2015 and FY 2014 1.1.1: Achieve critical milestones in development of new systems for the humanexploration of deep space. (Agency Priority Goal)Does not trend to FY 2013.MP-31

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGPerformance Trending:FY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Systems DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Space Launch SystemFY 2015 ESD-15-1: Complete the Space Launch System (SLS) Critical Design Review (CDR) in supportof Key Decision Point D.FY 2014 ESD-14-1: Complete the Critical Design Review (CDR) of the Space Launch System (SLS)Core Stage.FY 2013 ESD-13-1: Complete the SLS Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and establish the technicaldesign, cost, and schedule baseline for the SLS first flight.Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011HEC-11-1GreenFY 2012ESD-12-1GreenFY 2013ESD-13-1GreenAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Systems DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Orion Multi-Purpose Crew VehicleFY 2015 ESD-15-2: Complete sub-system design reviews for Orion and make progress on systemdevelopment toward a first uncrewed flight in FY 2018 and first crewed flight in FY 2021-2022.FY 2014 ESD-14-2: Complete Orion manufacturing and assembly so the spacecraft is ready for launchvehicle integration for the Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1).FY 2013 ESD-13-2: Manufacture Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) flight test hardwarerequired for initial integration testing for the Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1).Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011HEC-11-2GreenFY 2012ESD-12-2GreenFY 2013ESD-13-2GreenMP-32

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Systems DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Exploration Ground SystemsFY 2015 ESD-15-3: Complete the Exploration Ground Systems Program Critical Design Review (CDR).FY 2014 ESD-14-3: Complete the Exploration Ground Systems Program Preliminary Design Review(PDR).Does not trend to FY 2013.Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneMulti-year Performance GoalFY 2015 and FY 2014 1.1.2: Complete System Requirements Reviews by FY 2015 for the ResourceProspector Mission and In-Situ Resource Utilization Demonstration Experiment on Mars 2020 mission.FY 2013 1.3.3.1: Prioritize the knowledge of hazards, opportunities, and potential destinations forhuman space exploration that will be of use to future operations of an integrated architecture for humanspace exploration.Performance Trending:FY 2011NoneFY 20121.3.3.1GreenFY 20131.3.3.1GreenFY 2013 Performance Goal Progress SummaryAs part of the effort identified by this performance goal, NASA identified strategic knowledge gaps, orgaps in knowledge or information required to reduce risk, increase effectiveness, and improve the designof robotic and human space exploration missions. NASA uses strategic knowledge gaps to help informresearch and investment strategies, and prioritize technology development for human and roboticexploration. In FY 2013, these strategic knowledge gaps were completed, reviewed by the destinationrespective Analysis Groups, reviewed by the International Space Exploration Coordination Group, andaccepted by other space agencies.MP-33

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Research and DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Advanced Exploration SystemsFY 2015 ERD-15-1: Complete the System Requirements Review (SRR) for a robotic precursor missionto prospect for lunar ice.FY 2014 ERD-14-2: Complete International Lander contribution assessments for the robotic precursormission.FY 2013 ERD-13-2: Develop a set of strategic knowledge gaps on potential destinations for humanspaceflight, facilitate external advisory group review of the gaps and document the results in the GlobalExploration Roadmap.Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011NoneFY 2012ERD-12-4GreenFY 2013ERD-13-2GreenAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Research and DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Advanced Exploration SystemsFY 2015 ERD-15-2: Down-select asteroid capture mechanisms that will be likely candidates for theprimary flight system design.FY 2014 ERD-14-3: Award contracts to industry to fabricate and test several proof of concept asteroidcapture mechanisms.Does not trend to FY 2013.Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Research and DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Advanced Exploration SystemsFY 2015 ERD-15-3: Complete the Systems Requirements Review (SRR) for the In-Situ ResourceUtilization Demonstration Experiment on Mars 2020 mission.MP-34

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGFY 2014 ERD-14-6: Define the payload concept for the In-Situ Resource Utilization DemonstrationExperiment on Mars 2020 mission.Does not trend to FY 2013.Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneMulti-year Performance GoalDoes not trend to FY 2015.FY 2014 1.1.3: Develop technologies to enable autonomous mission operations in space to increaseaffordability.FY 2013 3.3.1.1: Develop technologies to enable autonomous mission operations in space to increaseaffordability.Performance Trending:FY 20113.3.1.1GreenFY 20123.3.1.1GreenFY 20133.3.1.1GreenFY 2013 Performance Goal Progress SummaryNASA continued to make progress toward achieving this performance goal. During FY 2013, NASAdemonstrated software and model development for the Exploration Flight Test-1 Advanced Caution andWarning System, as part of the effort to develop tools for increased autonomous operations in space. Itcompleted integrating automation tools with the Total Organic Carbon Analyzer on ISS, which willreduce the crew’s dependence on ground-based mission control. Crew training was completed toimplement this tool for on-orbit operations.Test results and analyses from the testing of the Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle (MMSEV) onthe air-bearing floor—a large floor at Johnson Space Center that uses a film of air to float objects, like anair hockey table, to simulate microgravity—provided adequate information on the capability needs for acrew excursion vehicle to interact with an asteroid. NASA determined that while anchoring to the asteroidcould help in some operations, the maneuverability of the MMSEV around the asteroid and positioning anextravehicular activity crew on a positioning work platform was a better concept.MP-35

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Research and DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Advanced Exploration SystemsDoes not trend to FY 2015.FY 2014 ERD-14-4: Test Autonomous Mission Operations software for the International Space Stationto reduce crew’s dependence on ground-based mission control.Does not trend to FY 2013.Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneMulti-year Performance GoalDoes not trend to FY 2015.FY 2014 1.1.4: Mature environmental control and life support system (ECLSS) technology to enablehuman exploration beyond low Earth orbit.Does not trend to FY 2013.Performance Trending:FY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Research and DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Advanced Exploration SystemsDoes not trend to FY 2015.FY 2014 ERD-14-5: Conduct integrated subsystem tests for improved water recovery and more reliableatmosphere revitalization systems.Does not trend to FY 2013.MP-36

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGPerformance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneMulti-year Performance GoalFY 2015 1.1.5: Incorporate autonomous controls in life support subsystems testing to increasereliability.Does not trend to FY 2014.Does not trend to FY 2013.Performance Trending:FY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: Exploration Research and DevelopmentContributing Program(s): Advanced Exploration SystemsFY 2015 ERD-15-4: Integrate sensors and feedback controls with the air-revitalization subsystem toincrease system performance.Does not trend to FY 2014.Does not trend to FY 2013.Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneMP-37

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGSTRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1.2: CONDUCT RESEARCH ON THE INTERNATIONAL SPACESTATION (ISS) TO ENABLE FUTURE SPACE EXPLORATION, FACILITATE ACOMMERCIAL SPACE ECONOMY, AND ADVANCE THE FUNDAMENTAL BIOLOGICALAND PHYSICAL SCIENCES FOR THE BENEFIT OF HUMANITY.Strategies and Next StepsNASA’s 2014 Strategic Plan discusses the strategy for achieving this strategic objective.As part of performance planning, NASA has established next steps for Strategic Objective 1.2 that willcontinue safe space operations and begin building capabilities. For FY 2014, NASA will: Maintain a safe and functional on-orbit platform;Continue and expand the International Space Station (ISS) on-orbit research program. Thisincludes conducting NASA research, as well as providing the facilities, ISS infrastructure, andISS crew hours needed to complete on-orbit research;Continue the commercial and International Partner cargo missions to resupply the ISS; andContinue efforts to extend ISS to at least 2024 to support future human exploration.Strategic Objective Leader: Greg Williams, Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Plans,Human Exploration and Operations Mission DirectorateMulti-year Performance GoalFY 2015 and FY 2014 1.2.1: Increase utilization of the International Space Station’s internal andexternal research facilities. (Agency Priority Goal)Does not trend to FY 2013.Performance Trending:FY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013NoneAnnual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: International Space StationContributing Program(s): International Space StationFY 2015 ISS-15-1: Continue to increase facility occupancy to 70 percent.FY 2014 ISS-14-4: Increase facility occupancy beyond the FY 2013 baseline of 60 percent.MP-38

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGFY 2013 ISS-13-4: Fully utilize ISS by ensuring that at least 75 percent of the research sites available areused.Performance Trending:FY 2008NoneFY 2009NoneFY 2010NoneFY 2011NoneFY 2012NoneFY 2013ISS-13-4YellowMulti-year Performance GoalFY 2015 and FY 2014 1.2.2: Maintain capability for six on-orbit crew members.FY 2013 1.1.1.1: Maintain capability for six on-orbit crew members.Performance Trending:FY 20111.1.1.1GreenFY 20121.1.1.1GreenFY 20131.1.1.1GreenFY 2013 Performance Goal Progress SummaryDuring FY 2013, NASA maintained the capabilities to support the six crew members continuously aboardISS. Crew members representing the United States, Russia, Canada, and Europe rotated every six monthson the Russian Soyuz vehicle. All of the required resupply flights, logistics, systems, and operationalprocedures continued to support a safe and effective ISS platform in space.Annual Performance IndicatorContributing Theme: International Space StationContributing Program(s): International Space StationFY 2015 ISS-15-2: In concert with International Partners, maintain a continuous six-crew capability onISS by coordinating and managing resources, logistics, systems, and operational procedures.FY 2014 ISS-14-1: In concert with International Partners, maintain a continuous six-crew capability onISS by coordinating and managing resources, logistics, systems, and operational procedures.FY 2013 ISS-13-1: In concert with International Partners, maintain a continuous six-crew capability onISS by coordinating and managing resources, logistics, systems, and operational procedures.MP-39

Management and PerformancePERFORMANCE REPORTING AND PLANNINGPerformance Trending:FY 20088ISS06GreenFY 20099ISS6GreenFY 201010ISS07GreenFY 2011ISS-11-1GreenFY 2012ISS-12-1GreenFY 2013ISS-13-1GreenMulti-year Performance GoalFY 2015 and FY 2014 1.2.3: Advance engineering, technology, and science research.FY 2013 1.1.2.1: Maintain a safe and functional ISS national laboratory and utilize it to advanceengineering, technology, and science research.Performance Trending:FY 20111.1.2.1GreenFY 20121.1.2.1GreenFY 20131.1.2.1GreenFY 2013 Performance Goal Progress SummaryDuring FY 2013, ISS supported a robust scientific research and technology development program,accomplishing 96 percent of the planned research objectives and providing 100 percent of the plannedresources to support research. At the Second Annual ISS Research and Development Conference, heldJuly 16-18, 2013, the American Astronautical Society presented awards to 12

Figure 8 is an annotated sample from the combined Annual Performance Report and Annual Performance . XPAND HUMAN PRESENCE INTO THE SOLAR SYSTEM AND TO THE SURFACE OF . M. ARS TO ADVANCE EXPLORATION, SCIENCE, . Orion flight test vehicle, the launch abort system, service module, spacecraft adaptor and fairings,

Related Documents:

Feb 11, 2016 · Federal grant reporting requirements fall into two categories: financial reporting and program performance reporting. This report focuses on financial reporting requirements and does not address program performance reporting. This report will be updated should significant legislative activity regarding

Policy Number: BQIS 460 0301 008 Incident Reporting/Review 6 Contact Information for Incident Reporting & Management Questions regarding incident management/reporting can be directed to the BQIS Incident Reporting Department through e-mail BDDSIncidentReports@fssa.

User Guide. This guide provides an overview of @ Work Reporting, the self-service reporting platform for clients of American Express Global Commercial Payments. This guide covers navigation of the tool and the setup process for Standard and Customized reports. For information about the Standard and Customized formats, as well as the specific report templates we offer, please refer to the @ Work Reporting Guide, which can be found under Reporting Help on the @ Work Reporting home page.

Analytical reporting, Interpretative reporting, Descriptive reporting, Investigative reporting Unit -3 Differences in reporting for Newspapers / News agencies, TV, Radio, Web Block -2: News Set Up Unit -1 Reporting department in newspapers, magazines, agencies, radio and TV Role, function a

Financial Reporting Web Studio is a web-based report authoring solution. Similar in look and feel to the Windows-based Reporting Studio, Financial Reporting Web . On the Oracle Hyperion Planning Home page, click . 2. In Navigator, under Reporting, click Reporting Web Studio. 1-1.

Key terms in incident reporting in NHSN Required Incidents reporting . Coming Up Next Optional Incident reporting Incident case studies . 20 . So far, the key terms in incident reporting and required Incidents reporting have been covered. Next, optional Incidents repor\൴ing as well as incident case studies will be discussed.

2.4 interpretative reporting 35 2.5 descriptive reporting 37 2.6 investigative reporting 39 check your progress 41 unit-3: reporting for different media 3.0 unit structure 42 3.1 learning objectives 42 3.2 introduction 42 3.3 why reporting for various media platforms differ 43 3.4 reporting for print media an

Modules for Data Reporting etcModules for Data Reporting, etc. Sample ID, Matrix, Test, Analyte, DQOs Analyte-specific Data for each Sample Tracks all data review /rework / release / data reporting / report revisions Queries / Management ReportsQueries / Management Reports