Decrzemr 1992 81EPA Questions And Answers About

2y ago
5 Views
3 Downloads
2.26 MB
28 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jayda Dunning
Transcription

vEnvironmental ProtectionA, fncy 81EPARadiation Studies Divisionf6603J)v.-Decrzemr 19926v0O-1-A L 1VQuestions And AnswersAbout Electric And MagneticFields (EMFs)9409080052 940826PDR ADOCK 05000390PDR]

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUTELECTRIC and MAGNETIC FIELDS (EMiFs)I.iINTRODUCTON .IBACKGROUND .1.1. What are EMFs?.22I.2. What are the sources of EMFs .1.3. Are EMFs like X-rays? .I.4. What can EMFs do to me? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I.5. .fjow do I reduce my exposure? .I.6. W hat is a gauss? . .I.7. What is a safelevel? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I.8. Is it true that levels below 2 milligauss (mG) are safe? Is there a standard? . . . . . . .I.9. What is a safe distance from a magnetic field source? 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I.10. Why isn't the federal government setting a standard for EMF levels? Why havesome states set standards? 4.I.11. Are there natural sources of EMFs? Are they like the fields created by power lines?Can these cause health effects? 4.4H1.PMEASUREMENTS 5 .1. 1. Do I need to get EM measurements? .11.2. What will EMF measurements tell me? .11.3. How do I get my house or school measured? 5.5M.HEALTH- -45. 55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Can I trust the measurements made by the utility'?.My neighbors had EMFs around their house measured. Is my house the same? .-.Can I make my own EMF measurements? 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Where can I buy or rent a meter? 6 .Does EPA recommend meters? 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .How much do meters cost? Which one is the simplest or best?9How can I get instructions on how to make these measurements? .How do I know how my readings compare to others"? .5566667711.4. Does EPA recommend measurement .12.22233344.8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .JII.1. What can EMFs do to me?88M.2. What are cancer clusters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.3. There are a lot of sick people in my neighborhood. There is [some source] here. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Could that be the reason?9111.4. Who should we contact when we suspect a cluster? 10.1M.5. I can percieve electric and magnetic fields, what can I do? . . 11M.6. I'm pregnant. Will ENIFs (or specific source) hurt me or my baby? .11M.7. The EPA report is just about cancer, but I've heard there are other effects. What arethey? Why hasn't EPA looked into those effects? .12SCHOOLS .i12December 1992

rV.1. They've taken measurements in my child's school. I know what the measurementsare, but what do they mean? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12IV.2. The measurements were higher in some areas (playgrounds, classrooms, etc.).Shouldn't the kids be prevented from entering those areas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13IV.3. How do we get our school measured?1.13IV.4. I heard that a nearby school had its schoolyard measured. I know the values. -Is myschoolyard the same? .13rV.5. Our children use VDTs at school. Is that safe?').13PV.6. Can't the computer be set up to minimize exposure? . 13IV.7. Can you tell me about low emission VDTs and screens that are supposed to blockEMFs? We were thinking about buying that sort of equipment for our school if itworks . wors.1.14.1IV.8. Besides power lines, substations, and VDTs, what are other common sources ofEMFs in schools?14V.TRANSFORMERS.14V. 1. What are transformers? .VI.,-14V.2.What is that metal electrical box on the comer of my lotV.3.V.4.V.5.Do EMFs come from transformers? .Aren't there chemicals in the transformers?.Are transfonners safe?.REALESTATE.15151515.15VI. 1. What are .the regulations about EMFs that pertain to houses and real estatetransactions').VI.2. What do I tell people about the power lines behind my house? .VI.3. Should I buy/rent a house near a power line or substation? .VI.4. If I am buying a house, can I get the seller to test for EM:Fs? .15151516VII.TIGATON.16VI.1. How can I stop the fields from coming into my house?' Can't I shield them) .16VII.2. I commute on the subway/train - are there fields there? Is it safe? .16VIa.3. I've heard about "Prudent Avoidance." What is that? How can I apply it to my-life?.16VI.4. How can I avoid EMFs?17.17VII.5. What can be done to assure that new transmission/distribution lines have low fields?Can fields be completely eliminated?.17VIA6. What can be done to reduce fields from existing transmission/distribution lines?Can fields be completely eliminated?.17VII.7. What can be done to reduce or eliminate exposure in homes? .17VII.8. What are utilities/manufacturers doing about reducing EMF exposure? . . .' .17VIf.VDTs PLUS THE OFFICE ENVIRONME3NT.VfI.l.VMfl.2.h.17I am concerned about EMFs and my VDT. What is the bottom line? .What can you tell me about low emission VDTs and screens that aresupposed to block EMFs? .ii1718December 1992

VII.3.VIII.4.VIII.5.VIII.6.VIII.7.VIMI.8.-IX.X.I read an ad that said this company's VDTs were safe and certified by EPAto have little/no EMFs. Is that true? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18Who else can I talk to about different VDTs and claims about low fields and'safe" monitors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18How do I contact the FDA, NIOSH, or OSHA? . 18Are VDTs different than my television? . . . . .'.19How far should I sit from my VD7? What about from other people's VDTs? . . 19VM.9.VIII.10.Vm.1I.Why doesn't the U.S. have VDT standards like Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19I've heard that laptops are safe. Is this true? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Is there someone who can come to our office to measure EMFs? .19What are other common sources of EMFs in the office? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20RESEARCH .IX.1. Isn't all research being done by the utilities9 . . . . . . .IX.2. Isn't that (utility) work biased? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IX.3. What research is underway now? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IX.4. Why isn't the federal government doing more research?IX.5. Why is the federal government so slow in responding9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS .X.1. Can the federal government make the power company move/change thetransmission/distribution lines?.X.2. Can the federal government stop the power company from putting in that new line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .or increasing the voltage?.2021. . . .X.3.What is a right-of-way (ROW)?X.4.Measurements at the edge of the ROW are higher than state rules. What should I doto make the power company fix this?.Why have some states written or proposed standards for EMFs?.Why hasn't the federal government regulated EMFs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .X.5.X.6.iii202020202020.21212121. .21December 1992

i.INTRODUCTION- he purpose of this document is to help EPA staffintter understand and respond to questions fromhe public about electric and magnetic fields, alsoknown as EMFs. Scientific understanding of thepotential health risks from EMIF exposure is in anearly stage. Because the science is complicatedand the health issue unresolved, it is critical thatwe carefully explain what we know and don'tknow and not give contradictory messages. Wewant to provide information that is consistent andscientifically correct.Certain basic ideas should be understood andtransmitted when responding to the public. Thefirst item on this list is a quote from the EPAScience Advisory Board review of the EPAdocument "Evaluation of the PotentialCarcinogenicity of Electromagnetic Fields"1) "Some epidemiological evidence is suggestive ofan association between surrogate measurements ofmagnetic field exposure and certain canceroutcomes. In such studies, the existence ofconfounders is always a possibility, but since nocommon confounder has yet been identified, theexisting evidence can not be dismissed. In theabsence of much better exposure information and anunderstanding of which exposures are significant, noprecise exposure-response relationship has yet beenadduced. This lack, together with limitedunderstanding of possible biological mechanisms,prevents the inference of cancer causality from theseassociations at this time." In other words, there issome evidence that points to a relationship betweenEMFs and some types of cancer. Though the bodyof evidence can not be dismissed, it is not completeenough to draw meaningful conclusions.This document lists commonly asked questions andsuggested answers by topical area. The questionsand answers are given in a somewhat casual styleto simulate a telephone conversation. Some of thequestions anticipate issues that will arise in thecourse of a conversation. The questions andanswers were derived from the experience of EPAstaff, both at Headquarters and in the Regions,who routinely field inquiries from the public onEMFs. We do not expect that the answers will beiven verbatim. Answers must be tailored to*rondto the specific questions and needs of theer. The reader may find that some of theanswers seem repetitious. Repetition andreinforcement are here by design. The documentis designed so that the user can start at any topicof interest to callers without always having to referto background or related information in othersections. For example, some callers are onlyinterested in video display terminals (VDTs) atwork. Some are interested in schools, includingVDTs at schools. To meet both needs, somequestions and answers on VDTs are repeated.Most questions about EMFs concern sources anduses of electricity, namely 60 Hz power. Thequestions and answers in this booklet focus on 60Hz exposures rather than exposures from sourcestransmitting higher frequencies.2) Other health effects have not been studied asextensively as cancer so any possible relationshipwith EMF exposure is even more uncertain than thecancer issue.3) Although the public tends to focus on exposurefrom transmission lines, for most people exposureto magnetic fields comes more from sources such asappliances and household wiring.4) Research is being sponsored and conducted byboth government organizations and the electricalpower and products industry. A combinedgovernment and industry research effort is plannedfor 1993.1December 1992

I.LACKGROUJND1.4.1.1.What are EMFs?There are many unanswered questions raised by theresearch done so far. There. have been both positiveand negative studies. We are not sure if EMFexposure adversely affects human health. Morecareful and extensive study of EMFs is needed.SEEMFs"is a shorthand term for "electric andmagnetic fields" or "electromagnetic fields."Electric and magnetic fields may occur alone or incombination and are a form of non-ionizingradiation. Examples of non-ionizing radiationinclude microwaves, visible light, and someultraviolet radiation. The American electric powersystem operates at 60 hertz (Hz). This means thatthe electric charges (current) flowing in the systemchanges direction 60 times a second. Althoughelectric and magnetic fields from 60 Hz exposuresare not considered "radiation" for various technicalreasons, they are still called "non-ionizingradiation".I.2.Since 1979, some studies of human populations,called epidemiology studies, suggest a potentialrelationship between exposure to EMPs and certaincancers. Unfortunately, there are manyuncertainties surrounding this information. Forexample, most of the epidemiological studies havevery limited information on what types of exposurewere experienced by the people in the studies. Theobserved increase in cancer was more pronouncedfor what are called "surrogates" or "indirect"estimates of EMF exposure than for electric andmagnetic fields measured using meters.' You mayhave heard about "wiring codes." Coding orcharacterizing houses according to the types ofnearby power lines has been one method to estimateEMF exposure in these studies. This is a"surrogate" of exposure.What are the sources of EMFs?Electric fields are produced by the presence ofelectrical charges, and magnetic fields areproduced by the movement of those charges.Electricity flowing in a wire or being used in an- pliance creates electric and magnetic fields. AllW wer lines and electrical appliances that drawcurrent have electric and magnetic fields aroundthem.1.3.What can EMFs do to me?The fact that disease incidence is correlated withsurrogate indexes for magnetic field exposure but'not with direct measurements, could be explained ineach of three ways or combination of these ways: a)the fields were different in the past, during the onsetof disease; than those measured later during thestudy; b) the wrong component or attribute of thefields was measured; and/or c) some other crucialfactor may be present which is unknowingly part ofwhat is being defined by the surrogate measure ofexposure. That factor could be some feature of theEMF exposure or something else altogether, such asa chemical exposure or differences in lifestyle.Are EMIFs like X-rays?No. X-rays, microwaves and other radio waves,and the electric and magnetic fields from powerlines and and electrically powered appliances areall part of the electromagnetic spectrum. ButX-rays are a form of electromagnetic radiationwith high levels of energy. This energy issufficient to dislodge electrons from atoms that thex-ray strikes; a process called ionization which canresult in cancer. EMFs, microwaves and othersimilar types of electric and magnetic fields do notionize atoms because of their lower energy levels.Some laboratory studies have shown that extremelylow frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fieldscan affect various activities of cells. The laboratorystudies on biological effects also are uncertain. Forexample, many of the positive results have onlybeen found in one laboratory. Usually, before a22 December 1992

result is accepted as proof by scientists, it has beenseen by several different investigators.Because of the way appliances are made, they havethe potential to have very high localized fields, butthen the fields decrease rapidly with distance. Forexample, typical magnetic field strengths not nearan appliance are 0.1 to 4 milligauss (mG), but thefield from an electric can opener can be 20,000 mGat 3 centimeters (approximately 1 inch) from theappliance. At 30 centimeters (approximately 1foot), appliance fields are usually around 1000 timeslower. For the can opener mentioned above, thelevel would probably be around 20 milligauss.Additionally, it is not clear whether some of thebiological effects seen in laboratory studies of cellswould be harmful effects if they also occurred inpeople or whether they are minor changes that ourbodies-could adjust to.The bottom line is that there is no establishedcause and effect relationship between EMFexposure and cancer or other disease. For thisreason, we can't define a hazardous level of EMFexposure.When you stand under a power line, you are alreadyat least 20 feet or more away from the line,depending on its height above ground. Under atypical 230 kilovolt transmission line the magneticfield is probably less than 120 milligauss. Incontrast, if you move about 100 feet away from theline, the magnetic field is probably about 15milligauss, and if you are 300 feet away from theline, the magnetic field is probably less than 2milligauss.It is known that one type of magnetic field canhave beneficial health effects. One treatment usedby doctors to help heal broken bones that are nothealing-nornally, is to expose the area for a fewminutes a day to a specific type of magnetic field.This apparently affects the body's capability forhealing bone.I.5.How do I reduce my exposure?e electric fields can be easily shielded,fields are much more difficult to shield.ectric fields are shielded to some degree byalmost eveiything such as trees, bushes, walls, andso forth. Magnetic fields can be reduced byenclosing the source in certain types of metal suchas something called Mu metal which is a specialalloy. The fields are still present, but the metalhas the capability to contain them. This approachto reducing field levels is not practical for manysources, including power lines. (Some gadgetshave recently appeared on the market, such asbuttons,.peis, etc., claiming to shield one fromfields; it is almost certain that these do not work.)Magnetic field intensity can also be reduced byplacing wires close together so that the field fromone wire cancels the field from the other. This isnow-being done in new designs for electricblankets. To some degree the same thing can bedone for power lines, but for safety and reliabilityasons power lines have minimum requiredFrom these examples, we can see that distancefrom the source of the magnetic or electric field cansubstantially reduce exposure.1.6.What is a gauss?The gauss is a unit for the strength of a magneticfield, also known as magnetic flux density. Arelated unit used internationally for magnetic fluxdensity is the tesla. One tesla is equal to 10,000gauss. Magnetic flux density is measured in termsof lines of force per unit area. Remember thepatterns that were generated by iron filings on apiece of paper which was placed over a magnet?These patterns are field lines. .'We normally speakof magnetic fields in terms of thousandths of agauss or milligauss, abbreviated "mG."I.7.What Is a safe level?We don't know if EMF exposure is harmful (asidefrom the concern for electric shocks and burns forextreme exposure). We don't know if certain levelsof EMFs are safer or less safe than other levels.3December 1992

With most chemicals, we assume exposure athigher levels is worse than less exposure at lowerlevels. This may or may hot be true for EMFspalso. More research is required to identify doseresponse relationships. There is some evidencefrom laboratory studies that suggests that theremay be "windows" for effects. That means thatbiological effects are observed at some frequenciesand intensities but not at others. Also, we do notknow if continuous exposure to a given fieldintensity causes a biological effect, or if repeatedlyentering and exiting of the field causes effects.There is no number to which we can point and say'That is a safe or hazardous level of EMFexposure."I.8.magnetic field has usually dropped below 2 mG. Inthe case of an electric can opener, the magneticfield is probably below 2 mG approximately 3 feetaway.1.10. Why isn't the federal government setting astandard for EMF levels? Why have somestates set standards?Several states have established standards for electricand/or magnetic fields at the edge of the right ofway for power lines, usually transmission lines.These standards either have been on the books for awhile, and are based on older scientific information,or were set more recently to establish levels ofexposure that should not be exceeded. Thestandards were intended to keep field levels fromgoing any higher, because of the existinguncertainty about health risks.Is it true that levels below 2 milligauss(mG) are safe? Is there a standard?We do not yet know what if any magnetic fieldlevels are safe or unsafe. Th3 level of 2 mG is anarbitrary value used in some epidemiologicalstudies to place people in broad exposurecategories. Some other level could have been-used. But, because no dose/response relationshipyet been determined for EMFs, we cannotstablish a level which would be considered safeor unsafe.I.11.Yes, there are natural sources. The earth has amagnetic field that is approximately 500 milligauss.The earth's magnetic field is relatively constant,meaning that it does not change very much withtime, unlike power lines. There are electromagneticfields associated with thunderstorms. Lightning is asource of EMFs. Some animals like sense naturalelectric and magnetic fields. Our bodies alsoproduce electrical fields that make our nervoussystems and hearts work. These internal electricfields are fairly high.As a result, neither the EPA nor any other federalregulatory agency has established a standard forEMIs.I.9.Are there natural sources of EMFs? Arethey lEke the fields created by power lines?Can these cause health effects?What is a safe distance from a magneticfield source?Since we do not know if EMF exposure isharmful, we don't know what intensity of field issafe' or unsafe. In turn, we cannot say what is asafe distance. A related question is, "At whatdistance is the strength of the field indiscerniblefrom the background field levels?" It depends onthe source of the magnetic field and the what thebackground field level is. Background magneticfields usually range from 0.1 to 4.0 illigaussG). In the case of most high voltage powers, at 300 feet from the center span, theBatteries and some electrical systems also havefields that do not change with time; these are calledstatic or DC fields. DC stands for direct current.In contrasts, fields from most electrical powersystems and appliances vary in time and so arecalled time-varying fields or AC fields. AC standsfor alternating current. Electric power systems inthe United States operate at 60 Hz which cycles 60times per second.Se4December 1992

11.MEASUREMENTSenvironmental and computer magazines. Thesefirms will perform EMP measurements usually for 200 - 300. Alternatively, you can buy your ownmeter for 75 and up. These meters usually comewith instructions.YI.1.Do I need to get ENMF measurements?That's up to you. EPA neither recommends nordiscourages people from obtaining fieldmeasurements. You may decide to have EMFmeasurements made if you want to satisfy personalquestions, concerns, or curiosity about EMIFexposures.1I.2.How do I get my house or schoolmeasured?Depending on where you live, your local powercompany may offer to conduct field measurementsaround your home. Additionally, your stateHealth Department or State Department ofEnvironmental Protection may also be able toprovide you with field measurements or refer youto consulting firms that conduct electric andgnetic field measurements. Consulting firmsPy also be found through advertisements inDoes EPA recommend measurementcontractors?No. EPA does not recommend or endorse privatecompanies and contractors. EPA does not have aproficiency program - like the one for radon testingfirms - to measure the qualifications of contractorswho conduct electric and magnetic fieldmeasurements. Therefore, we cannot endorse orcomment on the qualifications of any contractor.The state of California is developing a list of firmsmaking ENM measurements. But the state is notrecommending or certifying these firms. To obtainthe list when it is completed, call (415) 540-2669 orwrite to the Special Epidemiology Studies Program,California Department of Health Services, 2151Berkeley Way, Room 704, Berkeley, CA 94704.What will EMF measurements tell me?Magnetic and electric field measurements will nottell you whether or not your exposure is harmfulor puts you at an increased risk, but they mayallow you to tell how your home compares to the"average" home. You should be aware that themeters typically used for home measurements canonly tell you "average field strength" in milligaussunits, at the time the measurements are performed.Even these measurements will vary over timebased on many factors, such as which appliancesare being used. EMF laboratory studies show thathkiological effects may depend on one or more ofany aspects of exposure. like frequency, intensity,oientation of the field, duration, transient orintermittent current,voltage spikes. Scientistsstill do not know what aspects of exposure, if any,are important. We therefore hove no. way ofestablishing either a safe or unsafe level. On thebasis of available scientific data, there is no wayof interpreting the health significance of EMFmeasurements.IL3.11.4.I1.5.Can I trust the measurements made by theutility?Yes. Utilities should have the expertise and properequipment to make accurate measurements. Thereis no reason to believe that the utility is trying tomislead you by providing you with false readings.Since we do not understand very much about thepossible health effects of EMFs or what levels, ifany, might be hazardous, there is no reason for theutility to give you false results. It is important toremember that readings will vary depending onfactors such as the time of day the measurementswere taken. The differences in readings usuallyreflect how much electricity is being used by thepower system and other things, like what appliancesare being used.II.6.My neighbors had EMFs around theirhouse measured. Is my house the same?Probably not. Measurements in the house are oftenaffected by many sources of magnetic fields5sDecember 1992

including electrical appliances or power systemcomponents (transmission or distribution lines,transformers, or house wiring). Fields are evenroduced by "ground currents" flowing in waterpipes. EMFs decreases quickly with distance fromthe source. A power line or other source close toyour neighbor's house may generate a measurablefield there but levels at your house may be verydifferent.magazines. Similar advertisements can also befound in scientific equipment journals, as well asnewsletters such as Microwave News, EMT Healthand Safety Digest and journals such as IEEESpectrumMicrowave News also maintains a directory ofcompanies which sell or rent magnetic field meters.We can send you a copy of that list, or you mayobtain a copy of this directory by sending a letterrequesting the "Gaussmeter Table" and a selfaddressed stamped envelope and 1.00 for shippingand handling to:Microwave NewsP.O. Box 1799Grand Central StationNew York, NY 10163EMPs can also be generated by many sources inaddition to power lines such as small appliances,hot water heaters, auxiliary power generators, andhousehold wiring. Since the presence of variouskinds of appliances varies from house to house, sodo EMF levels. Therefore, EMF levels in yourneighbor's house may be very different from thosein your own house.11.7.II.9.Can I make my own EMfmeasurements?EPA does not recommend any specific supplier,manufacturer, or type of measurement equipment.Yes, but be sure to learn how to makemeasurements properly. Before using anyinstruments, you should educate yourself on thee and degree of sensitivity, accuracy, and properwreration of the meter. This information can beprovided by the manufacturer. You could alsofollow recommendations from trade associationson how to measure fields. Table 1 includes somesources of measurement protocols.11.10. How much do meters cost?the simplest or best?Which one isPrices for meters range between 75 and 650.Companies may rent meters for between 60 and 100 per week. Electric and magnetic fields arethree dimensional. Each dimension is called an"axis" (the plural is "axes"). To properly measurea magnetic field all three axes of the field should bemeasured-- horizontal (front), horizontal (side) andvertical. "Single-axis" meters measure only oneaxis at a time and must be rotated until it is alignedwith the field. A three-axis meter can get anaccurate measurement no matter how it is orientedin the field, and they measure all three axes at thesame time. Single-axis meters are generally thecheapest; while three-axis meters which display anintegrated measurement (all three axes) are moreMost simple magnetic field meters only readaverage field intensity, given in milligauss (mG).Measurements can vary with time, space, andpower load on the electrical system. Some metersonly measure magnetic fields. Some metersmeasure both electric and magnetic fields.Remember

Electric and magnetic fields may occur alone or in combination and are a form of non-ionizing radiation. Examples of non-ionizing radiation include microwaves, visible light, and some ultraviolet radiation. The American electric power system operates at 60 hertz (Hz). This means that the

Related Documents:

Progress Report No. 9 Table 2. Working Group meetings held between March 1992 and November 1992. Working Date Location Test Case Group I June 1992 Las Cruces, Las Cruces USA Trench 2 June 1992 Forsmark, Sweden 3 June 1992 Traben-Trarbach, Germany 4 October Toledo, Alligator 1992 Spain Rivers Tentative schedule for the Phase 2 reporting:

282 1992 Multi-Strategy Fund Corporation Registered 15-Jul-1994 560313 1992 Multi-Strategy Institutional Fund, Ltd. Registered 08-Jun-2010 598920 1992 Multi-Strategy Master Fund, L.P. Master Fund 01-Mar-2012 14129 1992 Multi-Strategy Private Investors, Ltd. Registered 31-Oct-2007 12493 1992 Multi-

Hamilin, Margot Vickers 1991-01-31 Vickers 1991-01-29 71 Chestnut Hill Cemetery, Salisbury NC Hamilin, Perry Ransom 1992-05-18 1992-05-13 62 Monticello Memory Gardens Hamiliton, Harry Hilton 1992-04-02 1992-03-31 70 NA

Title Description Issue Month Year American How-To May 1994 American How-To Nov 1994 . American Woodworker 121 May 2006 American Woodworker 125 Nov 2006 American Woodworker 124 Oct 2006 . Shopnotes 2 Mar 1992 Shopnotes 3 May 1992 Shopnotes 6 Nov 1992 Shopnotes 5 Sep 1992 Shopnotes 7 Jan 1993 .

Some of the questions have been reformatted from previous versions of this note. Questions 154-155 were added in October 2014. Questions 156-206 were added January 2015. Questions 207-237 were added April 2015. Questions 238-240 were added May 2015. Questions 241-242 were added November 2015. Questions 243-326 were added September 2016.

EXAM MFE MODELS FOR FINANCIAL ECONOMICS . EXAM MFE SAMPLE QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS ADVANCED DERIVATIVES . These questions and solutions are from McDonald Chapters 9-14, 18-19, 23, and 25 only and are identical to questions from the former set of MFE sample questions. These questions are representative of the types of questions that might be asked of

Feb 27, 2014 · Category: Questions Sample Questions It would be impossible to develop an all encompassing list of questions you may be asked during a pageant. It is possible to compile a list of questions you are likely to be asked. The following files can be used by contestants to study for pageants, coordinators to prepare impromptu questions and judges to

AngularJS uses dependency injection and make use of separation of concerns. AngularJS provides reusable components. AngularJS viii With AngularJS, the developers can achieve more functionality with short code. In AngularJS, views are pure html pages, and controllers written in JavaScript do the business processing. On the top of everything, AngularJS applications can run on all major browsers .