Annual Progress Report A GUIDANCE MANUAL FOR GREEN ECONOMY .

3y ago
16 Views
2 Downloads
1.26 MB
44 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Wade Mabry
Transcription

A GUIDANCE MANUAL FORGREEN ECONOMY POLICY ASSESSMENT

Copyright United Nations Environment Programme, 2014This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgementof the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses thispublication as a source.No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoeverwithout prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme.CitationUNEP. (2014). A Guidance Manual for Green Economy Policy Assessment.DisclaimerThe designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication donot imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United NationsEnvironment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or ofits authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the viewsexpressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United NationsEnvironment Programme, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constituteendorsement.UNEP promotesenvironmentally sound practicesglobally and in its own activities. Thispublication is printed on 100% recycledpaper, using vegetable inks and other ecofriendly practices. Our distribution policyaims to reduce UNEP’s carbon footprint.

a guidance manual forGreen Economy Policy assessment

List of boxes, table and figuresList of acronyms8Table 1. Example of benchmarking priority issues:global assessment of progress towardsMDGs5Box 1 Checklist for building an analytical basisfor GEPABox 2 Mongolia’s Draft Green DevelopmentStrategyBox 3 Steps to identify priority sustainabledevelopment issuesBox 4 Maximising involvement, legitimacy andeffectiveness of a green economy scopingstudy – experiences from BarbadosBox 5 Checklist for an investment analysisBox 6 The costs of attaining the MillenniumDevelopment GoalsBox 7 Steps in the sectoral asssessments of I&FFto address climate changeBox 8 Checklist for identifying enabling policiesBox 9 Public-Private Partnerships in the financialsectorBox 10 Checklist for assessing policy impactsBox 11 List of common assessmentmethodologiesBox 12 UNEP’s experiences in policy assessmentBox 13 Methodologies for modellingBox 14 Models for GEAPBox 15 Major considerations in model selectionDEPI Department of Environment and PrimaryIndustries (DEPI)GE Green economyGEPA Green economy policy assessmentGHG Greenhouse gasMDG Millennium Development GoalMEA Multilateral Environmental AgreementsO/M Operations and maintenancePESPayment for environmental servicesSCP Sustainable consumption and productionSDG Sustainable Development GoalT21 Threshold 21 modelUNEP United Nations Environment Programme679111316172122242529303112 Figure 1 McKinsey Global GHG Abatement CostCurve14 Figure 2 Estimated capital investment for selectedelectricity capacity targets14 Figure 3 Estimated operations and maintenanceexpenditures for selected electricitycapacity targets15 Figure 4 Approach for estimating investmentsusing system dynamics modelling such asthe T21 model29 Figure 5 Subsystem diagram of the Threshold 21modeliv

a guidance manual for green economy policy assessmentTable of contentsiv List of boxes, tables and figuresiv List of acronymsvi Acknowledgements1 122222222232727273212IntroductionTargets, policies and stakeholders2.1 Introduction2.2 Setting targets2.2.1 The need for prioritisation2.2.2 Measuring the un-measurable2.2.3 Establishing trends and baselines2.3 Existing policies2.4 Key stakeholders3 Investment analysis3.1 The role of investment in green economy policy assessment3.2 Estimating investment requirements3.2.1 Competitive bidding3.2.2 Measuring investments for MDGs3.2.3 Measuring investments for climate actions3.2.4 Measuring investments in the T21 model4 Identification of enabling policies4.1 Investment and enabling policies4.2 Public expenditure4.2.1 Financing the provision of green public goods4.2.2 Stimulating green markets4.2.3 Fiscal policy4.3 Trade policy4.4 Regulatory measures4.5 Skills and human capacity measures4.6 Social protection measures5 Impact assessment5.1 Introduction5.2 Estimate policy impacts across sectors5.3 Evaluate impacts on the overall well-being of the population5.4 Assess the benefits and costs for informed decision-making6 Modelling6.1 The role of modelling in green economy policy assessment6.2 Major steps7 Presenting green economy roadmaps34 Annex35 Notes36 Referencesv

AcknowledgementsThe writing of this report was led by Sheng Fulai of UNEP under the overall management and guidance of StevenStone, Chief of the Economic and Trade Branch. Invaluable contributions and insights were provided by AndreaBassi (KnowlEdge Srl), Weishuang Qu (Millennium Institute), Moustapha Kamal Gueye (International LabourOrganisation) and Zhuohua Tan (Millennium Institute).The conceptualization of the guidance manual also benefitted from the views and perspectives of all attendeesof the UNEP Green Economy Week held in Geneva in November 2013, including written comments from AlasdairForman (World Wide Fund for Nature), Bent-Arne Saether (Ministry of Environment of Norway), Ashbindu Singh(independent consultant), Jeremy Tamanini (Dual Citizen), Peter Wooders (International Institute for SustainableDevelopment) and Zhou Xin (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies).The following UNEP colleagues provided technical and policy guidance on various chapters: Claudia Assmann,Ronal Gainza-Carmenates, Oscar Garcia, Yoonhee Kim, Joy Kim, Simon Lobach, Tomas Ferreira Maques, JohnMaughan, Anja Von Moltke, Richard Scotney, Meriem Ait Ali Slimane, Rhoda Wachira and Yuki Yasui. Recognitionand thanks also go to Alice Dauriach, Diwata Hunziker, Alex Leshchynskyy, Leigh Ann Hurt and Ding-Yong Tan ofUNEP for editing, researching and contributing to various sections of this guidance manual over the course of itsdevelopment, and to Thomas Gianinazzi for the design and layout of the manual.vi

ForewordCountries seeking to transition to greener and more inclusive economies are often faced with significant challenges.Extreme poverty, growing inequity, degradation of ecosystems, and vulnerability to climate change are but a few ofthe barriers policy-makers must surmount to achieve more sustainable and inclusive development.This manual offers guidance on implementing a green economy approach to sustainable development, and comes at aunique moment in time when many countries and organizations are looking at the potential of bringing sustainabilityconcerns into the heart of economic policy.The manual contributes to the ongoing discussion on green economy in three ways. It clarifies the original startingpoint of UNEP’s “green economy approach” to sustainable development—an approach that emphasizes the reformand mobilization of investment for delivering more sustainable development. It takes the evolving SustainableDevelopment Goals as the starting point for any target-driven green economy policy process, and it brings togethertwo major technical components for green economy related policy analysis: indicators and modelling tools.A Guidance Manual for Green Economy Policy Assessment first responds to the call by Heads of State at Rio 20for the United Nations system to provide interested countries with methodologies to enable assessment of greeneconomy policies.This keystone piece, released in conjunction with two supporting publications on indicators and modelling, showsin a step-wise manner how to prioritise sustainable development goals and targets, how to estimate the investmentrequired for achieving them, and what policies need to be put in place to mobilize the investment and enhance itseffectiveness, ensuring an equitable transition for all.The manual is expected to meet the need for advice on how to translate the general concept of green economyinto practice, particularly in countries under the Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE), which bringstogether UNEP, the International Labour Organization, the United Nations Development Programme, the UnitedNations Industrial Development Organization and the United Nations Institute for Training and Research to providejoint advisory services to governments.As part of an ongoing effort to support policymakers in the process of policy and investment reform, we hope thatthis publication, together with the co-released volumes on modelling and indicators, will help to provide solutions tosome of the most pressing challenges faced by policymakers today.As UNEP continues to support and engage in discourses around the green economy and strengthen its workwith partner countries under PAGE, we look forward to improving upon the methodologies and tools available togovernments and practitioners as they advance the global transition to greener and more inclusive economies.United Nations Under-Secretary-General andUNEP Executive Director

1 IntroductionSince the term “green economy” appeared in thereport Blueprint for a Green Economy (Pearce,Markandya, & Barbier, 1989), interest in a greentransition has evolved and intensified, particularlywith the emergence of global challenges in the areasof climate, biodiversity depletion, energy prices andwater scarcity. UNEP has confirmed the headwaywith the publication of its landmark Green EconomyReport1 in 2011, which set forth the definition ofa green economy – one that improves human wellbeing and social equity while significantly reducingenvironmental risks and ecological scarcities – andshowed that the process of greening economies canbe a new engine of sustainable growth.In this context, the 2012 Rio 20 Conference reasserted the importance of green economy as a toolfor achieving social, economic and environmentalsustainable development. It specifically acknowledgedthat this approach can be tailored according to localand regional development needs, while workingtowards meeting broader international obligationsand targets. Rio 20 called on all relevant stakeholdersto form partnerships, strengthen institutional andfinancial capacity, and disseminate technology thatwill create an enabling environment for the transitionto a more resilient development pathway in varioussectors of national and international economies.This manual provides a customized guidance on howto conduct a target-driven Green Economy PolicyAssessment (GEPA) in order for policymakers todevelop and adopt green economy policies to achievetheir sustainable development targets. It is aimed atall those who are involved in managing, designing orimplementing projects in the name of green economy(or green growth, green development, low-carbondevelopment and the like). With this manual, UNEPhopes to address some of the growing demand fora methodology from counterparts and focal points inlocal ministries and national policy research institutesas well as high-level decision makers or other relevant2stakeholders engaged in incorporating green economyprinciples into their national development agenda.A typical GEPA includes five activities: 1) establishingpriority sustainable development targets based on theoverall development plans of countries; 2) estimatingthe amount of investments required to achieve thetargets; 3) identifying the policies or policy reforms thatare essential for enabling the required investments; 4)assessing the impacts of the required investments aswell as the enabling policies using a range of economic,social and environmental indicators and comparingthe results with the business-as-usual scenario; and5) presenting the assessment results to inform themaking of specific decisions.What are “green economy policies”? From UNEP’sperspective, green economy as a tool (as opposed to aparticular state of an economy) focuses on mobilising amore efficient allocation of resources through society’sinvestments – enabled by public policies – to achievesustainable development. Based on this perspective,any policy that is able to mobilise and shift investmentsto attain specific sustainable development targets canbe considered a green economy policy.Why focus on investments? Because investments shapethe future of our economies. Investment decisionschoose one type of infrastructure over others, anothertype of production or technology over others, whichnarrows down the options for future choices. Somewill lock in certain technologies and lock out others,while contributing to technological upgrade. Thisseems to be the case for many developing countriesthat are under the technological frontier (in mostsectors). Then there are investment decisions thatcan be physically irreversible such as the clearingof an old-growth forest. With regard to a greeneconomy, transition involves shifting investments toinfrastructure, clean technologies, natural capital andhuman development.

a guidance manual for green economy policy assessmentA wide array of policy reforms, regulatory changes andtargeted public expenditure are needed to trigger andsupport investments that work towards “improvedhuman well-being and social equity while significantlyreducing environmental risks and ecological scarcity” –the results from green economy as defined by UNEP.2In addition, behavioural change and institutionaldevelopment are also important as there is a crucialinteraction between change in households’ and firms’day-to-day behaviour and a shift in investments.This manual thus addresses the following questions:—— How are sustainable development (or similar)targets for guiding green economy policymakingidentified and prioritised (Section 2)?—— How is the amount of the investment required forachieving the priority targets estimated (Section3)?—— How are barriers to the required investmentsanalysed and how are the needed policy reformsidentified (Section 4)?—— How are the overall impacts of the requiredinvestments as well as the enabling policiesassessed (Section 5)?—— How can quantitative modelling be used toconduct the policy assessments (Chapter 6)?—— How should we present the assessment results toenable decision-making? (Section 7).In this regard, a summary of generic sectoral goalsand policy options is given in the Annex to illustratethe policymaking possibilities. It is expected thatexperiences from using the manual will also provideinputs to further improve to this living document.As this manual is unlikely to address all the issues facedby countries in moving towards their respective greeneconomy pathways, other related UNEP publicationsmay also be utilized. One of them is a working paperon the use of indicators to support green economypolicy making, which provides guidelines on how toestablish priority goals, targets and baselines, measurethe extent of policy interventions, and assess theimpacts of these interventions ex ante and ex post.3The other is a guide describing major modelling toolsthat can be used for the various assessments describedin this manual.4 Finally, the “Manual on IntegratedPolicymaking for Sustainable Development”, providesguidance on the process of public policy formulation.5Moreover, it provides general guidance that should beused in an adaptive manner. Countries interested inusing green economy as a tool to achieve sustainabledevelopment have varying contexts. Some may startfrom scratch, while others may have already prioritisedtheir targets and have been searching for ways toachieve them. Some may have developed policies buthave not been able to integrate them into developmentplans and budgets, partly because the impacts ofthe proposed policies are not fully assessed. Othersmay already have made huge investments in greensectors, but have encountered new challenges suchas the marketing of the related products or skills andhuman capacity gaps. Depending on where countriesare positioned in their green economy pathways, themanual needs to be used flexibly, bearing in mindthe overarching objective that it is meant to enabledecisions on green economy policy interventions(plans, strategies, or roadmaps).3

2 Targets, policies and stakeholders2.1 IntroductionThis chapter provides guidance on how to buildan analytical basis for conducting a GEPA. Its basisincludes: 1) the identification of priority sustainabledevelopment issues and the sectors including relatedgoals, targets, indicators, baselines and trends; 2)relevant existing policies and large-scale infrastructureprojects; and 3) major stakeholders. The effort to buildsuch an analytical basis may well lead to a stand-aloneproduct – a stocktaking study. This chapter, however,takes the key elements from a stocktaking study andintegrate them into a full assessment exercise. Thechecklist in Box 1 summarises the steps for buildingthe analytical basis.2.2 Setting targetsThe Rio 20 Outcome Document, “The Future WeWant”, endorsed the green economy as a tool forachieving sustainable development. In applying thistool, it is, therefore, necessary to revisit and list outexisting sustainable development goals, targets andindicators. It is important to keep in mind that suchgoals, targets and indicators are not always framedin the context of sustainable development and thatsome may well have been presented in the name ofgreen economy, green growth, human developmentor environmental protection.Many countries have developed a variety of suchgoals, targets and indicators over the last two decades.Usually, these have been devised through bottom-upparticipatory processes following the first Rio Summit,which adopted sustainable development as a global,overarching destination. Some countries are alsodeveloping new sets of goals, targets and indicatorsin the context of the post Rio 20 internationalnegotiations on Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs). Further yet, in some countries these goals andtargets may overlap with the Millennium Development4Goals (MDGs) or may stem from MEAs such as theStrategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, adoptedin 2010 by the Conference of the Parties to theConvention on Biological Diversity, which includestwenty global policy targets.As an example of the types of goals, targets andindicators to be considered for a GEPA, Box 2 givesthe example of Mongolia where a green developmentstrategy has been formulated, pending adoption bythe legislators.2.2.1 The need for prioritisationExisting goals, targets and indicators are often toomany. How then does one prioritise? Politically,stakeholder participation is essential for achieving aconsensus on what gets prioritised and for continuedpolitical support of the ensuing decision. Another wayto prioritise is to examine at the scientific evidence onenvironmental degradation and see how it impactson the overall well-being of the country’s population.Analytically, priorities should be given to issues thathave a strong nexus among the social, economic andenvironmental dimensions of sustainable development,not least because a green economy aims to generatemultiple benefits along all these dimensions.If few relevant targets exist, UNEP’s publication “UsingIndicators for Green Economy Policymaking” providesguidance on how to use indicators for identifyingpriority sustainable development issues as well as formeasuring policy interventions and assessing policyimpacts. It employs an approach that highlightscrosssectoral relations across indicators to shed lighton the importance of the underlying issues. Examplesinclude indicators of storm-related damages relatedto the impacts of climate change or of water usageintensity related to the depletion of groundwater.Box 3 shows the steps for using indicators to identifypriority issues.10

a guidance manual for green economy policy assessmentBox 1 Checklist for building an analytical basis for GEPA1. Review existing sustainable development (or

3.2.2 measuring investments for mdgs 3.2.3 measuring investments for climate actions 3.2.4 measuring investments in the t21 model 4 Identification of enabling policies 4.1 investment and enabling policies 4.2 Public expenditure 4.2.1 financing the provision of green public goods 4.2.2 stimulating green markets 4.2.3 fiscal policy

Related Documents:

Forensic Science Regulator GUIDANCE - GUIDANCE- GUIDANCE- GUIDANCE- GUIDANCE- GUIDANCE- GUIDANCE- GUIDANCE- FSR-G -206 Consultation Version Page 4 of 34 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 For the purposes of this appendix, contamination is defined as "the introduction of DNA, or biological material containing DNA, to an exhibit at or after the point

1. The Student Progress report is the legally required reporting document. The report must state that the student is receiving ELL support. 2. The Student Progress report must refer the parent to the enclosed report from the ELL teacher unless the ELL teacher’s comments are embedded in the Student Progress Report.

what further progress the Commission considers is required to meet the child poverty targets The progress report must include any comments or recommendations made by the Commission on the points above. Child Poverty Delivery Plan progress report 2020 The Scottish Government’s next progress report will cover the period April 2019 –

2019 District STAAR Progress Measure The distinction earned and the performance in the area of school progress are due to academic progress made by students. STAAR Test Accelerated Progress Expected Progress Limited Progress 4th Reading 14% 36% 50% 4th Math 17% 28% 54% 5th

akuntansi musyarakah (sak no 106) Ayat tentang Musyarakah (Q.S. 39; 29) لًََّز ãَ åِاَ óِ îَخظَْ ó Þَْ ë Þٍجُزَِ ß ا äًَّ àَط لًَّجُرَ íَ åَ îظُِ Ûاَش

Collectively make tawbah to Allāh S so that you may acquire falāḥ [of this world and the Hereafter]. (24:31) The one who repents also becomes the beloved of Allāh S, Âَْ Èِﺑاﻮَّﺘﻟاَّﺐُّ ßُِ çﻪَّٰﻠﻟانَّاِ Verily, Allāh S loves those who are most repenting. (2:22

Annual Report 2020 compared to our 2019 Annual Report. The total carbon footprint for printing CIMB Annual Report 2020 was 11,588kgCO2e, compared to 14,987kgCO2e for our 2019 annual report. The carbon footprint for the 3 books of CIMB Annual Report 2020 is 14.485kgCO2e. We are committed to reducing the environmental impact of our annual report .

Introduction 3 Context 6 Suggested guidance 11 Guidance Point 1: HIV vaccines development 11 Guidance Point 2: Vaccine availability 13 Guidance Point 3: Capacity building 15 Guidance Point 4: Research protocols and study populations 17 Guidance Point 5: Community participation 19 Guidance Point 6: Scientific and ethical review 21