GUIDELINES FOR THE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION

3y ago
23 Views
2 Downloads
2.64 MB
88 Pages
Last View : 27d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jenson Heredia
Transcription

GUIDEL INE SFOR T HEP L A NNING,DE SIGN,CONS T RUC T IONA ND M A IN T EN A NCEOF RECRE AT ION A LT R A IL S IN S OU T HAUS T R A L I A(RE V ISE D 2016)RECRE AT ION S A

ound51.2 W hat is a recreational trail?51.3 W hat and who are these guidelines for?51.4 S tructure of these guidelines62.0 RECREATIONAL TRAILS OVERVIEW72.18 W hy have recreational trails?2.2 Types of trails102.4 Types of trail users113.0 ST RATEGIC AND LEGISLATIVE rail system387.3Trail classification397.4Single or shared-use?397.5 D esigning sustainable trails407.6Constructing the trail437.7Coastal trails487.8 Urban trails7.992.3 Guiding principles7.0 TRAIL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIONSignage49508.0 MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE558.156Introduction8.2 M emorandum of understanding andpartnership agreements568.3 T rail maintenance and riskassessment schedules578.4 Conflict management588.5 E ducation and interpretation588.6 Monitoring and evaluation59593.2 State Level153.3 Regional Level193.4 Local Level193.5 Federal Level214.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES228.7 Marketing and promotion4.1238.8 P reparing promotional material and maps 60Introduction4.2 State Level244.3 Regional Level254.4 Local Level264.5 Peak User Groups279.2 C ase study 1 :Flinders Ranges by Bike625.0 TRAIL PLANNING285.1299.3 C ase Study 2 :Tom Roberts Horse Trail659.4 C ase Study 3 :Unmade Road Reserves as trail corridors68Introduction9.0 CASE STUDIES619.162Introduction5.2 E stablish a working group and developa plan295.3 R eview existing trail provision29APPENDICES715.4 L ocal Government endorsement295.5 Community consultation30APPENDIX A:Summary of Trail Classes725.6 Decision305.7 Feasibility study30APPENDIX B:Trail Categorisation System775.8 Concept design315.9 Funding32APPENDIX C:Trails Planning, Design and ConstructionChecklist806.0 CONSULTATION TECHNIQUES33APPENDIX D: G lossary826.13434APPENDIX E: R eferences and Useful Websites8436APPENDIX F: E xample Promotional Brochure: Riesling Trail85Introduction6.2 C onsultation or communication?6.3 C ommunication and consultationtechniques guidelines2

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTSPROJECT PARTNERSThis project is an initiative of the Recreation SA TrailsSub Committee. This committee has representativesfrom the following organisations:RecreationSA Horse SACanoe SABicycle SAScuba Diver's Federation of SAWalking SAThe trails sub committee of Recreation SA is chargedto ensure that sustainable opportunities prevail throughchampioning best practice techniques through theplanning, design, management and use of recreationaltrails in a wide range of environments in both urban andregional areas.We acknowledge Urban & Regional Planning Solutionsas the original authors of these guidelines with previousresearch undertaken by John Tagliaferri, Nick Bowmanof Bicycle SA and Rod Worthington.These guidelines have been reviewed and updated byRecreation SA to reflect changes and contemporarycircumstances.The review and update was supported by the Office forRecreation and Sport (ORS)These guidelines were updated in February 20163PROVIDING LEADERSHIP, SUPPORT AND ADVOCACYTO ORGANISATIONS IN THE RECREATION INDUSTRY.

1IN T RODUC T ION1.1BACKGROUND1.2 WHAT IS A RECREATIONAL TRAIL?1.3 WHAT AND WHO ARE THESE GUIDELINES FOR?1.4 STRUCTURE OF THESE GUIDELINES4PROVIDING LEADERSHIP, SUPPORT AND ADVOCACYTO ORGANISATIONS IN THE RECREATION INDUSTRY.

1.0 INTRODUC TION1.1 BACKG R O UN DA recent review of the State Trails Strategy 2005-2010(Horse SA 2013) found that a transition to an industryled trails committee rather than state-governmentled model was required, which included capacity fordialogue with state & local government.Accordingly, in 2014 The Office for Recreation andPhoto 2: Mount Barker Linear Park: Urban settingSport funded Recreation SA to manage and developthe Trails Sub Committee. This has seen positiveoutcomes for some key issues identified withinthe review.These guidelines were updated subsequent to thedevelopment of a 10 Year South Australian RecreationalTrails Master Plan.1.2 WHAT I S ARECRE AT I O N AL TR AI L?Photo 3: Mount Lofty to Waterfall Gully WalkingTrail: Natural settingThe South Australian Recreational Trails 10 Year MasterPlan provides the following definition of a recreationalThe trail corridor of water based trails will often be thetrail: Trails – a pathway for people to explore the naturalextremities of the river, creek, waterway or simply anworld, to connect communities together with place andarea of water that contains a number of interest pointsto enhance peoples’ lives through new perspectivesor the open sea. The trail itself may be a mapped orgained as we bring humanity out-of-doors. Trailsfrequented route through the waterway. Alternatively,provide pathways to beautiful natural experiences asa water trail may be focused on a single linear featurethey, improve health and wellbeing of land and peoplesuch as a reef or archaeological attractions suchas they benefit South Australian Residents and visitorsas shipwrecks.alike through shared positive outdoor experiences.1.3 WH AT A N D WH O A R E T H ES EG U ID EL IN ES FO R ?In most cases, recreational trails are used for nonmotorised recreational pursuits such as walking,running, cycling, horse riding, canoeing or scubaWhile it is acknowledged that South Australia has adiving. However, in some circumstances, trails can bestrong and varied network of trails, there are manydesigned for use by small wheeled vehicles such asaspects of the existing trail system that can bemotorised wheelchairs to enable access for people withimproved through enhancements to trail design, bettermobility impairments.linkages between trails and other community assetsand attractions, consistent trail policy, management,marketing and support for on-going development ofthe network.These guidelines have been prepared to providea comprehensive and coordinated document toprovide standards for trails or guidelines to assist theplanning, development, construction, management, andpromotion of recreational trails.Photo 1: Stirling Linear Park: Semi-urban settingThe Australian Standards 2156.1 – 2001 Walking TrackImportantly, the majority of trails are focused aroundClassification and Signage for Walking Tracks have beenareas of environmental and cultural interest or neardeveloped however there is a requirement for thesemajor population centres.standards to be in a plain English language description5PROVIDING LEADERSHIP, SUPPORT AND ADVOCACYTO ORGANISATIONS IN THE RECREATION INDUSTRY.

1.0 INTRODUC TIONdevelopment and maintenance and to ensure trail users1.4 S T R U C T U R E O F T H ES EG U ID EL IN ESget the most out of their trails and are able to pick theThese guidelines have been structured into ninemost appropriate trails for their abilities and enjoyment.chapters. The first four chapters provide a conciseThis document will provide links to the standards andoverview of the relevant legislation, strategicclassification systems appropriate for the range of trailsdocuments and Government Departments which areavailable in South Australia.involved in the planning, development and managementto describe the walks to the public. The development oftrails to agreed standards is important for trail planning,of recreational trails. These chapters ‘set the scene’ forThese guidelines have been prepared to assist all trailthe remaining chapters which provide more specificstakeholders involved in trail planning, development,detail and guidance for new trail proposals.construction, management, promotion and use.The guidelines will be of particular interest andIt is recognised that not all of these guidelines will beassistance to:relevant for every proposal for a new recreational trail.Rather, it is intended that trails proponents will select trail userswhat they need from the plethora of information. trail buildersAlso, the guidelines are designed to provide pointers trail managersto other sources of information rather than trying to public land managers (e.g. DEWNR, ForestrySAencompass all existing material relating to the planning,development and management of recreational trails.and Councils) clubs and associations that use trails owners of land through which trails pass orare proposed.6PROVIDING LEADERSHIP, SUPPORT AND ADVOCACYTO ORGANISATIONS IN THE RECREATION INDUSTRY.

2RECRE AT ION A L T R A IL S OV ER V IE W2.1 WHY HAVE RECREATIONAL TRAILS?2.2 TYPES OF TRAILS2.3 GUIDING PRINCIPLES2.4 TYPES OF TRAIL USERS7PROVIDING LEADERSHIP, SUPPORT AND ADVOCACYTO ORGANISATIONS IN THE RECREATION INDUSTRY.

2.0 RECREATIONAL TRAILS OVERVIEW2.1 WHY HAV E R E CR E AT I O N ALTRA I L S?SOCIAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH BENEFITS: Participation in trail activities improves physicaland mental health, assists with disease preventionThe demand for recreational trails is growing. Nationaland management, particularly cardiovascular,physical activity trends indicate that participation inmusculoskeletal, respiratory, nervous and endocrineunstructured recreational activities is increasing.systems as well as reducing obesity, hypertension,depression and anxiety.In addition, trail research undertaken by Market Equity Trail activities facilitate participation and interactionin 2004 found that trails provide a strong incentive tobetween a diverse range of community members,exercise (up to 85% of users) and were used by manyage groups, individuals and families and facilitateas a means to spend time with family and friendssocial interaction, e.g. community groups, voluntary(up to 89%).trail maintenance and conservation work.Both nationally and in South Australia based on 2009 Trails can offer a wide range of opportunities to a-2010 survey, walking is the most popular sport andwide range of people. Depending upon design, trailsphysical activity for people over 15 years of age (15%),can accommodate the elderly, people with mobilitywith jogging and cycling third and fifth respectivelyimpairments or satisfy those seeking challengingwith jogging being the only activity to show an increaseadventures and a sense of achievement.since 2005-2006. Bushwalking was ninth on the list of Participation in trail activities is relatively low cost.most popular activities and the most popular types of Trails can introduce participants to other recreationalfacilities used for sport and physical activity were parks,and participation offerings in the community.beaches and walking trails1. Trails help to connect people and places and developThe 2006 data indicates that, in South Australia, thereand grow community pride.were over 120,000 cyclists and 476,000 walkers.Almost 54,000 South Australians specifically reportedENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL BENEFITS:that they bush- walked for exercise or recreation in their Trails provide opportunities for the community toexperience natural and cultural environments.leisure time .2 Trails help to protect the environment by localisingHorse riding is another recreational activity pursuedimpacts and managing visitation effects.by many South Australians and is amongst the top Trails provide for educational and interpretive20 activities for women. Participation in canoeing andkayaking is steadily increasing, both Australia wideopportunities and increase environmental andand in SA, while scuba diving continues to attractcultural awareness and appreciation.many enthusiasts. All these pursuits are becoming a Well-connected trail networks can decrease thesignificant component of South Australia’s suite ofuse of motorised vehicles for transportation andrecreational opportunities.recreation, therefore reducing the production ofemissions that contribute to global warming andRecreational trails offer a diverse range of benefits torespiratory problems.our communities and the environment. Social health, Trail networks increase community ownership andphysical fitness, environmental management andawareness, cultural preservation and the economy canassist to preserve natural and cultural values.all benefit from the effects and experiences offered by Trails highlight our ‘living heritage’ by allowingrecreational trails. The main benefits can be summarisedthe continuation of traditional activities such asas follows:horse riding. Trails provide opportunities for communityparticipation in conservation and revegetation work.1ABS Australian Social Trends, Jun 2011 http://www.abs.gov.au2Statistics from ERASS Survey 2001-20068PROVIDING LEADERSHIP, SUPPORT AND ADVOCACYTO ORGANISATIONS IN THE RECREATION INDUSTRY.

2.0 RECREATIONAL TRAILS OVERVIEWECONOMIC BENEFITS:some way indicating status and responsibility to the Trails may generate intrastate, interstate andtrail provider.overseas tourism spending.Existing and proposed trails must be designed and Trails support and enhance local businessmaintained in accordance with their landscape settingopportunities.and to sustain the physical demands of use and Trail visitors spend money in towns and communitiesclimatic conditions.along or near trails.All trails will be: Trail users spend money preparing for their trailSUSTAINABLE: contributing to positive social,experience or recreation activities.environmental and economic outcomes Trail construction and maintenance can generateemployment opportunities.QUALITY: being accessible and meeting the needs ofthe user Participation in trail activities improves communityhealth and reduces health expenditure.South Australian trails are further classified into three2.2 TYPE S O F TR AI LScategories for trails based on their significance asSouth Australia features a variety of landscapes,are determined by characteristics that focus on thepopulation densities and climatic conditions. Patternstrail’s ability to demonstrate sustainability, experientialof settlement range from sparsely populated areasquality, attraction to tourists, generation of economicto peri-urban and suburban environments. Climaticbenefits and contribution to the lifestyle, health andconditions also vary significantly in both a geographicsocial wellbeing of South Australians. A series of keyand seasonal sense. Similarly, trail opportunities andindicators has also been developed to guide decisionexperiences vary widely and include a higher frequencymakers when determining the category of a trail. Theof use within and around the populated areas oftrail category characteristics are briefly described belowmetropolitan Adelaide to more isolated and intimatewhile the key indicators are detailed in Appendix B.local, regional or national trails. The trail categoriesexperiences in the outback and regional areas.The South Australian Recreational Trails 10 Year y attractlocal usersAttract interstateand intrastatevisitorsAttractinternational andinterstate touristsGenerateeconomic benefitsto the local areaGeneratesignificanteconomic benefitsto the regionGeneratesignificanteconomic benefitsto SAGood qualityexperiential valuesExcellent qualityexperiential valuesOutstandingquality ofexperiential valuesMake a significantcontributionto the lifestyle,health and socialwell being of thelocal communityMake a significantcontributionto the lifestyle,health and socialwell being ofSouth AustraliansMake a significantcontributionto the lifestyle,health and socialwell being ofAustraliansPlan establishes two broad categories of trails:SOCIAL TRAIL NETWORKSThese trail systems may be accessed in any number ofways from a variety of locations with little or no signs ordirection given on the ground. They are trail networkswhich are used by a variety of recreational users, whichare not necessarily approved or sanctioned by the landowner or manager. Whatever their status in terms ofaccess (sanctioned or otherwise) they are importantrecreational resources, often of significant value. Theyare often based around traditional access routes, desirelines or even natural corridors such as river banks,ridges, or linear features such as fences and walls.PRESCRIBED ROUTE SYSTEMSPrescribed route systems differ from social trailTrails that do not have the characteristics of local,networks in that they are based on marked or signedregional or national trails may well be importanttrail routes that are clearly defined. In additionto some users but will most likely be classed asprescribed route systems have clearly defined trailheads‘unsustainable trails’. Such trails will require reviewwhere trails start or finish or both.and analysis by trail managers to determine if trailimprovement or closure is appropriate.What sets them apart from social trail networks isthat they are trail marked or signed and promoted in9PROVIDING LEADERSHIP, SUPPORT AND ADVOCACYTO ORGANISATIONS IN THE RECREATION INDUSTRY.

2.0 RECREATIONAL TRAILS OVERVIEW2.3 GUI DI NG PR I N CI P LE SIn order to achieve a network of sustainable trails,Prior to the consideration of a new trails initiative –management and use of existing trails prior to theeither improving an existing trail or constructing a newconsideration of new trail projects. The developmentone – it is important to ensure that the proposal is bothof new trails may then be contemplated followingit may be necessary to review the location, design,the closure or rehabilitation of existing trails that are sustainable andinappropriately located or designed. qualityACCESSIBLE TRAILSThe new initiative should be accessible and clearly meetIntertwined with the objective of sustainability isthe needs of the intended users.the need for trails to be accessible and to meetAdherence to these two ‘guiding principles’ will assistthe needs of intended users. One of the main rolesin attracting support from the user group, minimiseof trails is to link communities to a variety of highthe likelihood of environmental damage and maximisequality experiences and interesting natural and ruralopportunities for land owner support and funding.landscapes. In addition, trails can improve mobility andThese ‘guiding principles’ are discussed further below.connectivity within and between urban areas. Trailswhich are readily accessible and provide links betweenSUSTAINABLE TRAILScommunities and landscapes can enhance lifestylesIt is fundamentally important that recreational trails arethrough the promotion of physical activity, reducing thesocially, economically and environmentally sustainable.reliance on motorised vehicles and improving healthGiven the limited amount of natural and semi-naturaland fitness.landscapes remaining in South Australia, recreationalAccessibility is determined by:activities that diminish natural values (biodiversity andlandscape amenity) are inappropriate and will not be proximity to the metropolitan area, populationacceptable to the community or other stakeholders.centres or tourist attractionsIt is vital, therefore, that high quality recreational proximity to related facilities such as horse agistmentexperiences are developed in landscapes that areareas or other popular riding areascapable of supporting the activities. proximity to transportation facilities such as railwayThe conservation and enhancement of natural areas,lines or road network providing access to the siteprotection of biodiversity and raising environmental existing or proposed linkages to other trails and theawareness should underpin the development of anwider trails network.environmentally sustainable trail network. This can beachieved through appropriate trail design, location proximity to natural attractions such as scenic views,selection and ongoing management.native vegetation, waterfalls, lakes, coastline, etc. presence of existing facilities that may support orTrails must also be economically and sociallysustainable. There is a growing body of evidence whichfacilitate use of the trail such as car parks, toilets,identifies the economic benefits that well developedpicnic fac

3.2tate Level S 15 3.3egional Level R 19 3.4ocal Level L 19 3.5ederal Level F 21 4.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 8.722 4.1oduction Intr 23 4.2tate Level S 24 4.3egional Level R 25 4.4ocal Level L 26 4.5eak User Groups P 27 5.0 TRAIL PLANNING 28 5.1oduction Intr 29 5.2t

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan