Health Insurance Under The Patient Protection And Affordable And .

1y ago
32 Views
2 Downloads
2.12 MB
294 Pages
Last View : 3d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Macey Ridenour
Transcription

HEALTH INSURANCE UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLECARE ACT: THE ROLE OF STATE BASED HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGESAND NAVIGATOR PROGRAMS IN ENSURING HEALTH COVERAGE FORVULNERABLE POPULATIONSbyREINETTA THOMPSON WALDROP(Under the Direction of Joel M. Lee)ABSTRACTThe U.S. has finally moved towards the reform of its health system. On March23, 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law by PresidentBarack Obama. With goals of expanded health coverage, access to quality, affordablehealth care, and reducing health care costs, the law sought to ensure that eligible U.S.citizens had health insurance regardless of ability to pay or existing medical conditions.Key to meeting the goal of providing health insurance was the creation of state HealthInsurance Exchanges (HIEs).To support the provision of guaranteed health carecoverage to millions of uninsured and at-risk/vulnerable populations HIEs were mandatedto contract with community based organizations and consumer advocacy agencies toserve as navigator programs. These agencies were charged with reaching, educating, andenrolling individuals into health plans.Establishing HIEs to serve as publicmarketplaces for purchasing health plans is new to the U.S. private insurance market.Thus, selecting business models and creating governance structures were key to HIE

effectiveness in carrying out federally mandated functions. Also, ensuring the use ofnavigator strategies that were successful in reaching at-risk/vulnerable populations wascritical. This research examined the creation of State Based HIEs in sixteen states andthe District of Columbia to assess HIE business models and governance structures. Italso explored traditional patient navigator programs to identify strategies proven to besuccessful in reaching at-risk/vulnerable populations for the delivery of health careservices and treatment.Findings show that choice of business model (state agency, quasi-governmental,or non-profit) and governance structure (board membership apportionment, appointment,and composition) could impact HIE effectiveness. Key was removal of certain designissues and barriers that impacted effective operation. A review of traditional navigatorprograms identified strategies that were successful in reaching at-risk/vulnerable patientsand facilitating treatment and care.Program elements such as advocacy, ethnic andracial concordance, and use of navigators who had experienced the same illness, wereamong some of the factors that were identified as elements of successful strategies. Thisresearch is expected to provide baseline information on the development of State BasedHIEs and HIE navigator programs as health reform in the U.S. continues to evolve.INDEX WORDS:U.S. health reform, PPACA, Health Insurance Exchanges,governance structure, government business models, navigator programs, navigatorprogram strategies, at-risk/vulnerable populations, uninsured non-elderly adults.

HEALTH INSURANCE UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLECARE ACT: THE ROLE OF STATE BASED HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGESAND NAVIGATOR PROGRAMS IN ENSURING HEALTH COVERAGE FORVULNERABLE POPULATIONSbyREINETTA THOMPSON WALDROPBS, Howard University, 1973M.S., The Georgia Institute of Technology, 1982A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in PartialFulfillment of the Requirements for the DegreeDOCTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTHATHENS, GEORGIA2013

2013Reinetta Thompson WaldropAll Rights Reserved

HEALTH INSURANCE UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLECARE ACT: THE ROLE OF STATE BASED HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGESAND NAVIGATOR PROGRAMS IN ENSURING HEALTH COVERAGE FORVULNERABLE POPULATIONSbyREINETTA THOMPSON WALDROPMajor Professor:Committee:Electronic Version Approved:Maureen GrassoDean of the Graduate SchoolThe University of GeorgiaDecember 2013Joel M. LeeSU-I HouCurtis A. HarrisDeborah Murray

DEDICATIONThis dissertation is dedicated to my children Stephanie, Angela, and Melvin Jr.Each provided love and support from near and far that sustained me through this journey.Thank you for your constant encouragement and for your praise of even my smallestaccomplishments. Your personal accomplishments in life have served as a barometer forreaching my goal of earning a doctoral degree.Special love and gratitude is given toAngela, who was with me from beginning to end, spending countless hours and nightsquizzing me before tests, reading papers, and worrying that I was not getting enoughsleep, all while encouraging me to continue to reach for my dream. Also, to DutchessWaldrop aka “wo-man’s best friend”, who loved me unconditionally through this processand who listened to my every frustration, never once talking back or questioning mydecisions.This dissertation is also dedicated to my family and friends in Philadelphia andAtlanta who encouraged me and gave me reasons to believe that I could even do this. Tomy nieces and nephews, I hope I have been an inspiration and proof that it is never “toolate to educate”! To my Atlanta running buddies, Anita, Sylvia, Cheryl, and Ruby, whounderstood that I needed to put our gatherings on hold for a minute, allowing me time towork hard toward this academic success story. Thank you my “Sistas”, and let thetheatre, movie going, and shopping trips once more begin. To anyone else whoencouraged me or just thought about me my heart is filled with love and gratitude for allof you.iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis dissertation would not have been possible without the guidance and supportof my dissertation committee and my Morehouse School of Medicine family.To Dr. Joel Lee, Dr. SU-I Hou, Dr. Curtis A. Harris, and Dr. Deborah Murray,each of you have given me a reason to smile and to know that earning a doctoral degree isa joy in and of itself. Thank you to Dr. Lee for your guidance, patience, and continuedsupport through my determination to write this manuscript at break-neck speed, and forchallenging my thinking along the way. To Dr. Hou, thank you for taking the mysteryout of social and behavioral theory and for teaching me that theory can have practicalpurpose. To Dr. Harris, thank you for hanging in there with me and for your incredibleattention to detail. And finally, to Dr. Murray, whose knowledge of this topic has provento be invaluable from day one, and who has become my “kindred doctoral spirit”.To my Morehouse School of Medicine family, I extend my greatest appreciationfor your support of my journey. To Dr. Patricia Rodney and Dr. Beverly Taylor, thankyou both for your encouragement and belief in me from the very beginning. To Dr.Stephanie Miles Richardson, your unending commitment to providing me the opportunityto “do what I had to do” and “be where I had to be” will never be forgotten. To myfaculty colleagues and members of the staff, thank you for your words of encouragementand concern, and for making sure that I had “done my homework and studied for myexams”. Lastly, to my students thank you for reminding me that this degree was myacademic destiny.v

TABLE OF CONTENTSPageACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .v.CHAPTER1INTRODUCTION .11.0 Overview .11.1 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 .11.2 Purpose of Research .31.3 Research Aims .61.4 Research Questions .91.5 Research Design and Methodology .101.6 Background .131.7 Summary .162LITERATURE REVIEW .172.0 Overview .172.1 General Literature Review Section .182.2 Manuscript 1 Literature Review Section .532.3 Manuscript 2 Literature Review Section .823 AN ASSESSMENT OF STATE BASED HEALTH INSURANCEEXCHANGE BUSINESS MODELS AND GOVERNANCESTRUCTURES . 122vi

3.0 Abstract .1233.1 Introduction .1243.2 Literature Review.1303.3 Methodology .1403.4 Results .1423.5 Conclusion .1483.6 Summary .1503.7 References .1513.8 Appendix .1554THE IDENTIFICATION OF TRADITIONAL NAVIGATOR PROGRAMSTRATEGIES TO INFORM HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGENAVIGATOR PROGRAMS FOR OUTREACH, EDUCATION ANDENROLLMENT OF VULNERABLE POPULATIONS IN APPROVEDHEALTH PLANS .1694.0 Abstract .1704.1 Introduction .1714.2 Literature Review.1754.3 Methodology .1994.4 Results .2024.5 Conclusion .2064.6 Summary .2084.7 References .2104.8 Appendix .218vii

5CONCLUSION .2265.0 Overview .2265.1 Research Questions and Research Findings .2275.2 Reform of the U.S. Health System: Final Thoughts .2325.3 Proposed Frameworks for Sustainability .2355.4 Challenges & Recommendations for Future Research .2415.5 Research Limitations .2495.6 Implications for Public Health .2505.7 Summary .253REFERENCES 255APPENDIX.278viii

CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.0OverviewThe purpose of this chapter will be to guide the reader through this body of workand to provide the basis for how this dissertation topic will be addressed.It will startwith brief comments on the purpose of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act(PPACA) and its overall goal of guaranteeing near universal health insurance coveragefor all U.S. citizens. A more detailed look at the law will be provided in the LiteratureReview Chapter. This chapter will also present information on the purpose of thisresearch, acquaint the reader with the research questions, and finally address the researchapproach and methodology that will be used. It will end with a background section thatwill summarize the two major subjects of this dissertation research, namely State BasedIndividual Health Insurance Exchange (HIE) Marketplaces and Health InsuranceExchange navigator programs. Unless otherwise noted, all references singular or plural inthis dissertation to a HIE marketplace will refer to the Exchange established forindividual purchases.1.1The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010In response to rising health care costs and an increasing number of uninsuredindividuals, on December 24, 2009, the U.S. Congress passed the Patient Protection andAffordable Care Act.On March 23, 2010, the President signed the Patient Protection1

and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148) into law. On March 30, 2010, the Health Careand Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-152) was signed into law. The twolaws are collectively referred to as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Congress, 2010). Forthis research when referencing the law, the terms Patient Protection and Affordable CareAct (PPACA) and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will be used interchangeably.ThePPACA seeks to: (1) expand health coverage; (2) ensure access to quality, affordablehealth care; and (3) contain the growth of health care costs (CMS, 2012; DemocraticNational Committee, 2010; Congress, 2010; Shi & Singh, 2012).The underlying tenet of the law is that all U.S. citizens will have access to quality,affordable health care, thus reforming the U.S. health care system to guarantee nearuniversal health coverage for almost 40 million eligible individuals (Democratic NationalCommittee, 2010; Elmendorf, 2010). Providing health insurance coverage to millions ofU.S. citizens who have never possessed the resources to secure health care will requirethe development of an insurance marketplace that is structurally different from thetraditional private market and current publicly funded government programs. To aid inthe provision of health insurance coverage for all U.S. citizens, the law requires thatstates establish HIEs which will serve as marketplaces for the purchase of affordablehealth plans. According to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), thePPACA is also intended to:“ [create] new competitive private health insurance marketplaces –called Affordable Insurance Exchanges or “Exchanges” – that willgive millions of qualified individuals and qualified small employersaccess to affordable coverage. Exchanges will help qualified2

individuals and qualified small employers shop for, select, and enrollin high-quality, affordable private health plans that fit their needs atcompetitive prices. Exchanges will also assist eligible individuals toreceive premium tax credits and cost sharing reductions or helpindividuals enroll in other Federal and State health care programs. Byproviding one-stop shopping, Exchanges will make purchasing healthinsurance easier and more understandable and will put greater controland greater choice in the hands of qualified individuals and smallbusinesses” (DHHS, CMS, & CCIIO, 2012d)State HIE marketplaces are a cornerstone of the PPACA and their role in ensuringhealth insurance coverage for the uninsured, including at-risk/vulnerable populations willbe the subject of this dissertation research. The DHHS is the designated ExecutiveBranch department tasked with establishing and promulgating agency rules, regulationsand guidance associated with the establishment of HIEs at the state level.1.2Purpose of ResearchA principal component of the PPACA is the provision of health insurancecoverage for uninsured U.S. citizens.A major goal of the Act is the provision of nearuniversal health insurance coverage for the first time ever in the United States. Anadditional goal is the provision of accessible, affordable, and quality health care for allU.S. citizens while reducing the cost of care associated with all health services.In aneffort to reach these goals and to meet the statutory requirements of the law, states aremandated to establish HIE Marketplaces (Congress, 2010, pp. Part III, Sec 1321). Tocarry out this mandate, states have been given three options for establishing their HIEmarketplace:1) establish a State Based Exchange, 2) establish a State Partnership3

Exchange, or 3) default to a Federally Facilitated Exchange (DHHS, 2012b). Regardlessof the option chosen, HIEs will serve as public marketplaces for the purchase ofaffordable health insurance, and the individual exchange is viewed as a key factor inensuring the enrollment of eligible individuals into qualified health plans (QHPs).To reach uninsured and at-risk/vulnerable populations, the law requires HIEs toestablish navigator programs.HIE navigator programs will use community basedorganizations and consumer service agencies to provide outreach and education touninsured and at-risk/vulnerable populations, aimed at enrolling them into health plansoffered through the exchange. Researchers generally agree that there is no one singledefinition for what a navigator program is, or for what it does. However, for this researcha distinction will be made between what are known as patient navigator programs andnavigator programs established under HIEs. HIE navigator programs will be defined as afederal mandate for the facilitation of outreach, education, and enrollment of atrisk/vulnerable populations into qualified health insurance plans. For this research, thoseprograms that assist patients in facilitating the delivery of clinical health services will bereferred to as traditional patient navigator programs. The use of these programs tofacilitate the delivery of health services for illnesses, such as cancers, where research hasdocumented disparities in treatment and care has been a longstanding practice.While the DHHS does not provide a formal definition for at-risk/vulnerablepopulations in any of the guidance it has prepared for establishment of HIEs or navigatorprograms, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), an agency within theDHHS defines other at-risk/vulnerable populations as4being“ defined by socio-

economic status, geography, gender, age, disability status, risk status related to sex andgender, and among other populations identified to be at risk for health disparities” (CDC,2013).For purposes of this research, the terms at-risk/vulnerable populations and atrisk/vulnerable groups will be used interchangeably, and will refer to those individuals orgroups noted in the CDC definition with the exception of geography and disability status.Also, because they are generally covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or State Children’sHealth Insurance Programs (SCHIP), elderly individuals and children will not beincluded in the definition of at-risk/vulnerable populations for this research.Morespecifically, this research will focus on low-income, racial and ethnic minority groups,culturally diverse groups with limited English proficiency, and groups whose medicalcircumstances render their receipt of care especially burdensome without support andadvocacy. Also, for this study, uninsured employees of small businesses will also beconsidered an at-risk group because of their economic circumstances. In researching adefinition of vulnerable populations, it was discovered that the term at-risk/vulnerablepopulations can be viewed differently depending on the research discipline, (e.g. healthcare, sociology, psychology, criminal justice, emergency preparedness, etc.), and includeany number of at-risk/vulnerable groups (Ruof).HIEs are viewed as a key factor in the enrollment of vulnerable, uninsured, andotherwise eligible individuals into affordable, qualified state health plans. They willserve as marketplaces where consumers will be able to purchase individual healthinsurance through non-group health plans that have been approved by the state.5

Affordability has traditionally been the factor excluding these groups from the pool ofhealth insurance options generally available to the public and through employersponsored group health plans. Based on eligibility requirements and conditions set forthin the law millions of vulnerable individuals will be eligible for subsidies to helppurchase health insurance through HIEs, thus making health insurance affordable (S. R.Collins, Robertson, R., Garber, T., Doty, M.M., 2013; Cunningham, 2010).However, the use of HIEs and mandated navigator programs to facilitateenrollment of at- risk/vulnerable populations into insurance programs is new, both to theinsurance market and to individuals who have never purchased or enrolled in healthinsurance plans. Therefore, the purpose of this research will be to examine the role ofState Based HIE marketplaces and navigator programs in ensuring health coverage for atrisk/vulnerable populations who have traditionally been excluded from private insurancemarkets and publicly financed health programs.1.3Research AimsThis research has three specific aims. The first is to provide an overview ofhealth reform and the PPACA mandate for the establishment of HIEs and their role inmaking health insurance coverage available for vulnerable U.S. citizens. This aim willinclude an examination of: 1) health reform efforts in the U.S. and how we have reachedthis point of near universal coverage; 2) federal requirements for the establishment anddesign of HIE marketplaces; and, 3) how HIE marketplaces operate in the State ofMassachusetts and in European national insurance markets.6

The second aim of this research is to provide a review of the governance structure/business model, governance appointment and composition of State Based HIEs. Evenwith a set of minimum guidelines from the DHHS, states have been given considerablelatitude in designing and implementing their state HIE marketplaces (Blavin, Blumberg,Buettgens, Holahan, & McMorrow, 2012).This includes the business model, andgovernance structure under which they operate, including the apportionment,appointment and composition of their governing authority.Thirdly, this study will examine the use of traditional navigator programs in thedelivery of clinical health services.It will examine the strategies used to engageindividuals in seeking care, explore the at-risk/vulnerable populations served bytraditional navigator programs, and examine the characteristics that navigators mustpossess to be effective facilitating services. HIE navigator programs are mandated at aminimum to provide outreach, education, and enrollment of at-risk/vulnerablepopulations into approved qualified health plans.Also, while not officially termednavigator programs, public and private organizations such as the American Associationof Retired Persons, officially sanctioned employee unions, and certain group purchasinginsurance plans have used navigator program strategies to facilitate enrollment oftargeted groups of individuals into group insurance plans. Thus, the use of navigator likeprograms outside the field of health service delivery aimed at enrolling specificpopulations into insurance programs has been a long standing practice.Navigator programs in HIE marketplaces, while not delivering patients to a pointof service for the provision of care, will nonetheless guide and facilitate the same kinds of7

socially, economically, culturally and medically at-risk individuals to enrollment inhealth insurance plans.To be successful, it is theorized that exchange navigatorprograms will need to incorporate many of the characteristics and strategies proven to besuccessful in facilitating vulnerable patient groups into programs of care. A review of theliterature is expected to identify strategies associated with successful patient navigatorprograms.These strategies will be explored to determine if their adoption by HIEnavigator programs will garner the same success in reaching at-risk/vulnerablepopulations for enrollment in HIE qualified health plans.Early Research on HIE and Navigator Program DesignThe PPACA HIE marketplace is in its infancy. Therefore, no quantitative data toexamine the success of enrolling at- risk/vulnerable populations into HIE marketplacesexists. Thus, an empirical research approach using information or experiences from avariety of sources as well as information empirically derived from evidence basedpractice will be used for this research. Early HIE marketplaces and navigator programswill undergo changes as markets mature, health plan options change, and state andfederal rules and regulations governing their operation evolve. An empirical researchdesign will allow for a qualitative review of how HIEs are established and designed tofunction at implementation. It could also aid in the development of a baseline for futurestudies.The value of this early research on HIE governance and navigator program designis that a synthesis of state government and legislative actions, data and information fromhealth research organizations, literature review findings, and rules, regulations and8

guidance from the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), can offer acomprehensive snapshot of program operations at inception. Thus, this research couldprovide a baseline for improving the future design of exchanges. States that havedefaulted to a Federally Facilitated Exchange and those now implementing StatePartnership Exchanges may find this research of value should they move to State BasedExchanges in the future.Going forward, the empirical findings from this research could help to improvefuture navigator program designs. They could lead to increased program success foroutreach, education and enrollment of uninsured and at-risk/vulnerable populations intoHIE approved health plans.1.4Research QuestionsTwo research questions have been identified for this study: Research Question 1:Do business model and governance structuredesign including governing authority composition impact the effectivenessof State Based HIE agencies? Research Question 2:Do traditional navigator programs that facilitatehealth service delivery to at-risk/vulnerable populations provide evidenceof proven strategies that can be used by State Based HIE navigatorprograms for outreach, education and enrollment of at-risk/vulnerableindividuals into qualified health plans?9

To address these research questions, this study will examine evidence basedfindings on governance of agencies created by state legislative action. It will also explorethe strategies used by traditional navigator programs that can be adopted by HIEnavigator programs to facilitate outreach, education and enrollment of at-risk/vulnerablepopulations into qualified health plans.1.5Research Design and MethodologyThis dissertation will use a qualitative methodology for synthesis of data,information, and empirical research findings that have informed practice inorganizational governance and navigator program strategies. In some instances, publicuse datasets providing descriptive data on states, the demographics of their uninsuredpopulations, and their proposed HIE plans, are available for download from securedgovernmental websites. These datasets will be used where possible to synthesize datapertinent to this research and to generate descriptive statistics.The DHHS deadline for states to create State Based exchanges was in December,2012. States choosing to implement state partnership exchanges were required to notifyDHHS by February 15, 2013. According to a Kaiser Family Foundation Report on StateDecisions on Health Insurance, as of June 20, 2013, 16 states and the District ofColumbia had elected to set-up State Based exchanges, 7 states had declared an intentionto operate hybrid state – federal partnership exchanges, and 27 states had elected todefault to federal-facilitated exchanges (H. J. K. F. Foundation, 2013b). Inclusion andexclusion criteria are presented below.10

Inclusion criteriaThe sixteen states plus the District of Columbia that have elected to operate StateBased individual HIE marketplaces will be included in this study. Through exchangewebsites, these states have begun to communicate information with their citizens on thestatus of their HIE marketplaces and how they are designed to operate.They haveincluded information on the legislative action creating the exchange, information onapproved qualified health plans, and the purpose of the HIE marketplace. Also, stateinformation available on DHHS and CMS websites, as well as data collected and madepublicly available through DHHS reporting mechanisms will be used for this research.Specific sections of the PPACA as signed into law will also be cited in this research.Journal articles and reports on reform of the U.S. health system, uninsured and atrisk/vulnerable populations, health insurance marketplaces, navigator programs, and theeconomic implications of health reform have been published by highly respected healthpolicy and research organizations. These include Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, TheCommonwealth Fund, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and Trust for America’sHealth, and others. Data collected and made available through these organizations’websites will also be used in this research.Research on traditional navigator programs that have guided at-risk/vulnerablepopulations has produc

Barack Obama. With goals of expanded health coverage, access to quality, affordable health care, and reducing health care costs, the law sought to ensure that eligible U.S. citizens had health insurance regardless of ability to pay or existing medical conditions. Key to meeting the goal of providing health insurance was the creation of state Health

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. 3 Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.