DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE - United States Army

1y ago
11 Views
3 Downloads
1.71 MB
156 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ronan Garica
Transcription

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEHEADQUARTERS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS CENTER (AFMC)WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIOMEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION LIST19 June 2002FROM: ASC/ENOI2530 LOOP ROAD WESTWRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH 45433-7101SUBJECT: Proposed Notice 2 to MIL-STD-810F, Environmental Engineering Considerations andLaboratory Tests (Project ENVR-0050)1. Air Force Standardization Code 11, Preparing Activity for subject document, forwards the proposedaction for your review and concurrence, in accordance with DoD 4120.24-M. Designate any comments as"Essential" or "Suggested;" provide justification for "Essential" comments. Please provide a contact forcomments which may require resolution.2. Forward replies by 5 August 2002 to Lorraine.Wright@wpafb.af.mil, facsimile (937) 656-7700, orthe above address. Reviewers should route responses through their respective Departmental Custodian:Army Code TE, Navy Code AS, or this office—Air Force Code 11. Lack of response will be construedas concurrence.3. Direct any questions regarding this project to Lorraine Wright, telephone DSN 785-8701,Commercial (937) 255-8701./signed/DAVID F. BRITTONChief, Information Management BranchEngineering Operations and Support DivisionEngineering Directorate1 Attachment:1. Proposed MIL-STD-810F Notice 2

DISTRIBUTION LISTStandardization CodeATTN: AMSTE-TM-T (MR. HERB EGBERT)COMMANDERUS ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION COMMANDABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD .mt.wsmr.army.milTE(ARMY CUSTODIAN)ATTN: CSTE-DTC-YP-YT-GC-CM (MR. RANDY PATRICK)ARMY YUMA PROVING GROUNDKFR BLDG 3520YUMA AZ 85365-9110randy.patrick@yuma.army.milATTN: AMSTA-AR-QAW-E, BLDG 12 (MR. REX POWELL)COMMANDERUS ARMY TACOM-ARDECPICATINNY ARSENAL NJ 07806-5000rpowell@pica.army.milARATTN: AMSTA-TR-E/IE, MS 270 (MS. MARTA TOMKIW)COMMANDERUS ARMY TANK-AUTOMOTIVE & ARMAMENTS COMMAND6501 E. 11 MILE RDWARREN MI 48397-5000tomkiwm@tacom.army.milATATTN: AMSAM-RD-SE-TD-ST (MS. VICKY CAYLOR)COMMANDERUS ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMANDREDSTONE ARSENAL AL milLayne.Merritt@peoavn.redstone.army.milAVATTN: MR. RAYMOND HALLOFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS2600 PENTAGON DAEN-ZCTOPOGRAPHY AND SPACE ACTIVITIES BRANCHWASHINGTON DC 20310-2600Raymond.hall@hqda.army.milCE2

ATTN: CEERD-TS-T (MR. KENNETH TRAVELLER)COMMANDERUS ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER7701 TELEGRAPH RDALEXANDRIA VA 22315-3864pd-te@tec.army.milCE3ATTN: AMSEL-LC-LEO-E-EP (MR. JEFFREY CARVER)COMMANDERUS ARMY COMMUNICATIONS – ELECTRONICS COMMANDFORT MONMOUTH NJ ATTN: AMSSB-REO-S (N) (MR. T. YABLONICKY)US ARMY SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTERNATICK SOLDIER CENTERNATICK MA 01760-5062anton.yablonicky@natic.army.milGLATTN: AMSRL-CS-DM (MR. NORMAN LEKANG)DIRECTORUNITED STATES ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY2800 POWDER MILL RDADELPHI MD 20783-1197nlekang@arl.milHDATTN: MTTE-DPE (MS. NAPIECEK/MR. KERR)DIRECTORMILITARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT COMMANDTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING AGENCY720 THIMBLE SHOALS BLVD – SUITE 130NEWPORT NEWS VA .ARMY.MILMTATTN: AMXLS-AT (MS. ANN PODRASKY)CHIEFLOGSA PACKAGING, STORAGE AND CONTAINERIZATION CTR11 HAP ARNOLD BLVDTOBYHANNA PA 18466-5097ann.podrasky@logsa.army.milSM

ATTN: CODE 4.1.4 (MR. CARL LEVANDUSKY)COMMANDERNAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMANDHIGHWAY 547LAKEHURST NJ 08733-5100levanduskycj@navair.navy.milAS(NAVY CUSTODIAN)ATTN: MS. MELODY DATESCOMMANDERNAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER WEAPONS DIVISIONAVIONICS DEPARTMENT, CODE 450000E521 9TH STPOINT MUGU CA 93042-5001datesmj@navair.navy.milCHATTN: MS. ANNETTE TORRESCOMMANDERNAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER WEAPONS DIVISIONTECHNICAL DATA DEPARTMENT, CODE 330000E521 9TH STPOINT MUGU CA 93042-5001torresam@navair.navy.milCHATTN: DR. RONALD MERRITTCOMMANDERNAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER WEAPONS DIVISIONCODE 4.7.6.3.0.0.D1 ADMINISTRATION CIRCLECHINA LAKE CA 93555-6100merrittrg@navair.navy.milATTN: CODE 644 (MR. CLINTON WINCHESTER)BATTERY TECHNOLOGY GROUPPOWER SYSTEMS BRANCHNSWC CARDEROCK DIVW BETHESDA MDWinchesterCS@nswccd.navy.milATTN: MR. ROBERT D. KOLACKI BLDG OTC-1, ROOM 2155COMMANDING OFFICERSPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMANDSPAWARSYSCOM 053-1D4301 PACIFIC HWYSAN DIEGO CA 92110-3127kolackir@spawar.navy.milEC

ATTN: MR. JOE CARRCOMMANDERPROGRAM SUPPORT DIRECTORATE (PSE-D)MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS COMMAND2033 BARNETT AVE, SUITE 315QUANTICO VA 22134-5010carjj@mcsc.usmc.milMCATTN: MR. RUSSELL J. DUPRE, JR.COMMANDER, INDIAN HEAD DIVISIONNAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTERSTANDARDIZATION TEAM (CODE 840M)101 STRAUSS AVEINDIAN HEAD MD 20640-5035duprerj@ih.navy.milOSATTN: MS. DOROTHY MCDOWNEYCOMMANDER, NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMANDCOMMAND STANDARDS EXECUTIVE PROGRAM OFFICE(CODE 05Q, BLDG 197, RM-2W-2200)1333 ISAAC HULL AVE, SOUTH EASTWASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC vsea.navy.milSHATTN: MR. DAVID CURFMANCOMMANDERATLANTIC DIVISION, NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING CMDCRITERIA OFFICE1510 GILBERT STNORFOLK VA 23511-2699curfmanrd@efdlant.navfac.navy.milYDATTN: MR. EARL WEAVERASC/FBX BLDG 5532725 C STREETWRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH 45433-7424Earl.Weaver@wpafb.af.milATTN: MS. BETTY RODRIGUEZASC/ENFA BLDG 5602530 LOOP ROAD WESTWRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH 45433-7101Beatriz.Rodriguez@wpafb.af.milATTN: MS. JOLENE BOUTONASC/ENFA BLDG 5602530 LOOP ROAD WESTWRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH 45433-7101Jolene.Bouton@wpafb.af.mil11(AIR FORCE CUSTODIAN)

ATTN: LT. COL. BERNARD ELAAIR FORCE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION OFFICEDIRECTORATE OF OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTSHQ USAF/XORD – ISO1815 NORTH FORT MYER DR, SUITE 4ARLINGTON VA 22209-1809asccmcus@pentagon.af.mil06ATTN: STANDARDIZATION MATTERSHQ ESC/ENBUILDING 1606 2ND FLOOR9 EGLIN STHANSCOM AFB MA 01731-2100esc.en.cmb@hanscom.af.mil13ATTN: MR. DAVID DAVISSMC/AXM2420 VELA WAY, SUITE 1467EL SEGUNDO CA 90245-4659david.davis@losangeles.af.mil19ATTN: MR. ROGER WILLIAMSONTRI-S, INC.323 SOUTH UNION AVEHAVRE DE GRACE MD 21078willcasa@erols.comATTN: MR. DAVID ALBRIGHTalbright@westar.comATTN: MR. ANDY ANDERSONandy anderson@udlp.com

This draft, dated 11 June 2002 and prepared by Air Force Code 11, has not been approved and is subject tomodification. DO NOT USE PRIOR TO APPROVAL. (Project ENVR-0050)NOTICE OFCHANGENOT MEASUREMENTSENSITIVEDRAFTMIL-STD-810FNOTICE 2DATEDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSETEST METHOD STANDARDENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTSTO ALL HOLDERS OF MIL-STD-810F:1. THE FOLLOWING PAGES OF MIL-STD-810F HAVE BEEN REVISED AND SUPERSEDE THE PAGESLISTED:NEW PAGECover PagePart One-iiPart One-iiiPart One-ivPart One-vPart One-viPart One-1Part One-2Part One-3Part One-4Part One-5Part One-6Part One-7Part One-8Part One-9Part One-10Part One-15Part One-16Part One-17Part One-18Part One-23Part One-24Part One A-3Part One A-4DATE1 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 20001 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000SUPERSEDED PAGECover PagePart One-iiPart One-iiiPart One-ivPart One-vPart One-viPart One-1Part One-2Part One-3Part One-4Part One-5Part One-6Part One-7Part One-8Part One-9Part One-10Part One-15Part One-16Part One-17Part One-18Part One-23Part One-24Part One A-3Part One A-4DATEREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGEREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGEAMSC N/ADISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.AREA ENVR

DRAFTNEW PAGEPart One B-1Part One B-2Part One C-3Part One C-4Index-1Index-2Index-3Index-4Index-5Part 4-3505.4-4505.4-5505.4-6505.4-72DATExx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 20001 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 20001 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002SUPERSEDED PAGEPart One B-1Part One B-2Part One C-3Part One C-4Index-1Index-2Index-3Index-4Index-5Part 4-3505.4-4505.4-5505.4-6505.4-7DATE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGEREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGEREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000

DRAFTNEW 6511.4-7511.4-83DATExx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 20001 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 20001 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002SUPERSEDED 507.4-6507.4-7507.4-8508.5-9508.5-10NEW PAGENEW 4-6511.4-7511.4-8DATE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGEREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGEREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 November 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 January 20001 November 20001 November 2000

DRAFTNEW 0.2-11520.2-12520.2A-5520.2A-6522-3522-42.DATE1 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 20001 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 20021 January 2000xx xxxxx 20021 January 20001 January 2000xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002xx xxxxx 2002SUPERSEDED 2520.2-11520.2-12520.2A-5520.2A-6522-3522-4DATE1 November 20001 November 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGEREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 2000REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGEREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE1 January 20001 January 20001 January 2000RETAIN THIS NOTICE AND INSERT BEFORE TABLE OF CONTENTS.3. Holders of MIL-STD-810F will verify that page changes indicated above have been entered. This notice pagewill be retained as a check sheet. This issuance, together with appended pages, is a separate publication. Eachnotice is to be retained by stocking points until the standard is completely revised or canceled.4

DRAFTCustodians:Army - TENavy - ASAir Force - 11Review activities:Army - AR, AT, AV, CE, CR, GL, HD, MT, SMNavy - CH, EC, MC, OS, SH, YDAir Force - 13, 195Preparing activity:Air Force - 11(Project ENVR-0050)

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

DRAFTNOT MEASUREMENTSENSITIVEMIL-STD-810F1 January 2000SUPERSEDINGMIL-STD-810E14 JULY 1989DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSETEST METHOD STANDARDFORENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONSAND LABORATORY TESTSAMSC N/AAREA ENVRDISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.REPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE.

MIL-STD-810FdateDRAFTFOREWORDThis test method standard is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense (DoD).Although prepared specifically for DoD applications, this standard may be tailored for commercial applications aswell. MIL-STD-810F is a significant revision of MIL-STD-810E. Much of the standard is rewritten completely toprovide clearer direction. The primary emphases are still the same -- tailoring a materiel item's environmental designand test limits to the conditions that the specific materiel will experience throughout its service life, and establishinglaboratory test methods that replicate the effects of environments on materiel rather than trying to reproduce theenvironments themselves. However, the "F" revision has been expanded significantly up front to explain how toimplement the environmental tailoring process throughout the materiel acquisition cycle.This revision recognizes that the environmental design and test tailoring process has expanded to involve a widerange of managerial and technical interests. Accordingly, this revision orients environmental design and testdirection toward three basic types of users who have distinctly different, although closely associated, interests:program managers who, among other responsibilities, ensure proposed concepts and systems are valid and functional inintended operational environments; environmental engineering specialists (EES), who enter the acquisition process earlyto assist combat and materiel developer tailoring efforts by preparing life cycle environmental profiles and draftingtailored design criteria and test programs, and the design, test, and evaluation community, whose analysts, engineers, andfacility operators use tailored designs and tests to meet user needs.The most visible difference in the "F" revision is that the overall document is in two parts.Part One describes management, engineering, and technical roles in the environmental design and test tailoringprocess. It focuses on the process of tailoring materiel design and test criteria to the specific environmentalconditions a materiel item is likely to encounter during its service life. New appendices support the succinctlypresented text of Part One. Appendix A contains complete descriptions of environmental engineering tasks. Thesetasks, along with management information in Appendix B and EES guidance in Appendix C, will help to ensure theenvironmental design and test tailoring process is implemented and documented according to the disciplined, butflexible approach to materiel acquisition called for in Department of Defense (DoD) 5000-series documents(DoDD 5000.1). Terms used in this standard relating to the materiel acquisition process are limited to terms used inthe DoD 5000-series documents; to avoid confusion and promote simplicity, service-specific terms/processes are notused.Part Two contains environmental laboratory test methods to be applied according to the general and specific testtailoring guidelines described in Part One. It is important to emphasize that these methods are not to be called out inblanket fashion nor applied as unalterable routines, but are to be selected and tailored to generate the most relevanttest data possible.To support the tailoring process described in Part One, each test method in Part Two contains some environmentaldata and references, and identifies tailoring opportunities for the particular method. Some methods afford a widelatitude for tailoring; some can be tailored up to established limits, and some have relatively few tailoring options.Whenever possible, each method contains background rationale to help determine the appropriate level of tailoring.Each test method supports the test engineer and test facility operator by describing preferred laboratory test facilitiesand methodologies. Any specific tailoring information and values contained in these test methods should besupplanted by more up-to-date or program-specific information when available.When applied properly, the environmental management and engineering processes described in this standard can beof enormous value in generating confidence in the environmental worthiness and overall durability of materielsystem design. However, it is important to recognize that there are limitations inherent in laboratory testing thatmake it imperative to use proper caution and engineering judgment when extrapolating these laboratory results toresults that may be obtained under actual service conditions. In many cases, real-world environmental stresses(singularly or in combination) cannot be duplicated practically or reliably in test laboratories. Therefore, usersSUPERSEDES PAGE PART ONE-II OF MIL-STD-810F.Part One-ii

DRAFTMIL-STD-810Fdateshould not assume that a system or component that passes laboratory tests of this standard also would pass field/fleetverification trials. DoD 5000-series documents call for component technology to be demonstrated in relevantenvironments to reduce risk on components and subsystems which have been demonstrated only in laboratoryenvironments (DoDI 5000.2).The US Department of Defense would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions toward thedevelopment and publication of MIL-STD-810F:Anderson, Andy -United DefenseMerritt, Ron -US Navy, Naval Air Warfare CenterBair, Jim -US Air Force, Wright-Patterson AFBMoriceau, Jacques -LRBA, FranceBell, Dwayne -US Air Force, Eglin AFBMoss, Ron -Ordnance Board, United KingdomCaruso, Hank -G's and DegreesSullivan, Jamie -US Army, Redstone Technical TestCenterConnon, Skip -US Army, Aberdeen Test CenterTanner, Steve -US Navy, Naval Air Warfare CenterEgbert, Herb -US Army Developmental TestCommandWalton, Scott -US Army, Aberdeen Test CenterGalloway, Judy -US Army, Aberdeen Test CenterWeaver, Earl -US Air Force, Wright-Patterson AFBHenry, Connie -US Air Force, Wright-Patterson AFBWilliamson, Roger -US Army Test and EvaluationCommandMacMartin, Dave -National Defence Headquarters,CanadaAlso, a special thank you to Herb Egbert, Chairman of the MIL-STD-810 revision committee for his leadership,dedication, and perseverance in revising this document.This standard is intended to be a '\"living document" that will be updated as new concepts, technologies, andmethodologies evolve. Address beneficial comments (recommended changes, additions, deletions) along with clear,supporting rationale and any pertinent data that may improve this document to: ASC/ENOI, Bldg. 560, 2530 LoopRoad West, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7101. Use the Standardization Document Improvement Proposal(DD Form 1426) appearing at the end of this document or send a letter detailing the paragraph/page number,recommended wording, and reason/rationale for the recommendation.Address technical questions to the following offices:Aeronautical Systems Center, ATTN: ASC/ENFS, 2530 Loop Road West, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7101;Commercial Tel: (937) 255-8357 or 904-5863; DSN 785-8357 or 674-5863; Fax: (937) 476-4546 or 255-2363.Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, ATTN: Code 476400D, China Lake CA 93555-6100; CommercialTel: (619) 939-4667; DSN 437-4667; Fax: (619) 939-1065.US Army Developmental Test Command, 314 Longs Corner Road, ATTN: CSTE-DTC-TT-M, Aberdeen ProvingGround MD 21005-5055; Commercial Tel: (410) 278-1476; DSN 298-1476; Fax: (410) 278-4243/1475.SUPERSEDES PAGE PART ONE-III OF MIL-STD-810F.Part One-iii

MIL-STD-810F1 January 2000DRAFTTHIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANKREPRINTED WITHOUT CHANGE.Part One-iv

DRAFTMIL-STD-810FdatePART ONE -- ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM GUIDELINESTABLE OF CONTENTSParagraphPage1.SCOPE . 11.11.21.3Purpose. . 1Application. . 1Limitations. . 22.APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS . 32.12.22.2.12.2.22.32.4General. 3Government Documents. . 3Standards. . 3Other government documents. 3Non-government Documents. . 3Order of Precedence. . 43.TERMINOLOGY . 44.GENERAL PROGRAM GUIDELINES . rogram Managers. 7Roles of the program manager. . 7Guidance for program managers. . 7Mission Need Statement (MNS). 8Operational Requirements Document (ORD). . 8Systems Acquisition Master Plan (SAMP). 9Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP). . 9Environmental Engineering Specialists (EES). 9Roles of environmental engineering specialists. . 9Environmental engineering tailoring tasks. 10General. 10Preparing an Environmental Engineering Management Plan (EEMP), Task 401. . 10Developing an Environmental Test and Evaluation Master Plan (ETEMP). 10Defining a Life Cycle Environmental Profile (LCEP), Task 402. 10Developing Operational Environment Documentation (OED), Task 403. . 10Developing an Environmental Issues/Criteria List (EICL), Task 404. . 11Preparing a Detailed Environmental Test Plan (DETP), Task 405. . 11Preparing an Environmental Test Report (ETR), Task 406. . 11Design and Test Engineers and Facility Operators. 11Roles of design engineers. 11Roles of test engineers/facility operators. . 11Guidance for design and test engineers and test facility operators. 12Natural environment (field/fleet) testing. 12Laboratory testing. 125.GENERAL LABORATORY TEST METHOD GUIDELINES. 155.15.2Standard Ambient Test Conditions. 15Tolerances for Test Conditions. . 15SUPERSEDES PAGE PART ONE-V OF MIL-STD-810F.Part One-v

MIL-STD-810F1 January 2000DRAFTTABLE OF CONTENTS 35.145.155.165.175.185.18.15.18.2Test Instrumentation. 16Suitability for environment. . 16Calibration. . 16Stabilizing Test Temperature. . 16Test item operating. 16Test item non-operating. . 16Test Sequence. . 16Test Level Derivation. 17Pretest Information for Facility Operators. 17Test Setup. . 17Installing the test item in test facility. . 17Test item operation. 18Pretest Baseline Data. 18Information During Test. 18Interrupted Tests. . 18In-tolerance interruptions. 18Out-of-tolerance interruptions for methods 503, 506, 510, 511, 514, 515, 516, 517, 519, 522,and 523.

naval air systems command highway 547 lakehurst nj 08733-5100 levanduskycj@navair.navy.mil attn: ms. melody dates ch commander naval air warfare center weapons division avionics department, code 450000e 521 9th st point mugu ca 93042-5001 datesmj@navair.navy.mil attn: ms. annette torres ch commander naval air warfare center weapons division

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. 3 Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.