QUANTUM MECHANICS - University Of Belgrade

1y ago
27 Views
2 Downloads
1.24 MB
297 Pages
Last View : 1d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ellie Forte
Transcription

QUANTUM MECHANICSProfessor John W. NorburyPhysics DepartmentUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeP.O. Box 413Milwaukee, WI 53201November 20, 2000

Contents1 WAVE FUNCTION1.1 Probability Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.1.1 Mean, Average, Expectation Value . . . . .1.1.2 Average of a Function . . . . . . . . . . . .1.1.3 Mean, Median, Mode . . . . . . . . . . . .1.1.4 Standard Deviation and Uncertainty . . . .1.1.5 Probability Density . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.2 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics . . . . . . . . .1.3 Conservation of Probability (Continuity Equation)1.3.1 Conservation of Charge . . . . . . . . . . .1.3.2 Conservation of Probability . . . . . . . . .1.4 Interpretation of the Wave Function . . . . . . . .1.5 Expectation Value in Quantum Mechanics . . . . .1.6 Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.7 Commutation Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.8 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.9 Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78810101114141919222324242732332 DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS352.1 Ordinary Differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352.1.1 Second Order, Homogeneous, Linear, Ordinary Differential Equations with Constant Coefficients . . . . . . 362.1.2 Inhomogeneous Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392.2 Partial Differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 422.3 Properties of Separable Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442.3.1 General Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442.3.2 Stationary States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442.3.3 Definite Total Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451

2CONTENTS2.42.52.3.4 Alternating Parity . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.3.5 Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.3.6 Complete Orthonormal Sets of Functions2.3.7 Time-dependent Coefficients . . . . . . .Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 INFINITE 1-DIMENSIONAL BOX3.1 Energy Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.2 Wave Function . . . . . . . . . . . .3.3 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.4 Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .464646495051.53545763644 POSTULATES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS4.1 Mathematical Preliminaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.1.1 Hermitian Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.1.2 Eigenvalue Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.2 Postulate 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.3 Expansion Postulate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.4 Measurement Postulate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.5 Reduction Postulate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.6 Summary of Postulates of Quantum Mechanics (Simple Version)4.7 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.8 Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6565656667686970717475I771-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEMS5 Bound States5.1 Boundary Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5.2 Finite 1-dimensional Well . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5.2.1 Regions I and III With Real Wave Number5.2.2 Region II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5.2.3 Matching Boundary Conditions . . . . . . .5.2.4 Energy Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5.2.5 Strong and Weak Potentials . . . . . . . . .5.3 Power Series Solution of ODEs . . . . . . . . . . .5.3.1 Use of Recurrence Relation . . . . . . . . .5.4 Harmonic Oscillator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7980818283848788899192

CONTENTS5.53Algebraic Solution for Harmonic Oscillator . . . . . . . . . . 1005.5.1 Further Algebraic Results for Harmonic Oscillator . . 1086 SCATTERING STATES6.1 Free Particle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6.1.1 Group Velocity and Phase Velocity .6.2 Transmission and Reflection . . . . . . . . .6.2.1 Alternative Approach . . . . . . . .6.3 Step Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6.4 Finite Potential Barrier . . . . . . . . . . .6.5 Quantum Description of a Colliding Particle6.5.1 Expansion Coefficients . . . . . . . .6.5.2 Time Dependence . . . . . . . . . .6.5.3 Moving Particle . . . . . . . . . . . .6.5.4 Wave Packet Uncertainty . . . . . .7 FEW-BODY BOUND STATE PROBLEM7.1 2-Body Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7.1.1 Classical 2-Body Problem . . . . . .7.1.2 Quantum 2-Body Problem . . . . . .7.2 3-Body Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1371393-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEMS1418 3-DIMENSIONAL SCHRÖDINGER8.1 Angular Equations . . . . . . . . . .8.2 Radial Equation . . . . . . . . . . .8.3 Bessel’s Differential Equation . . . .8.3.1 Hankel Functions . . . . . . .EQUATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1431441471481509 HYDROGEN-LIKE ATOMS1539.1 Laguerre Associated Differential Equation . . . . . . . . . . . 1539.2 Degeneracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15710 ANGULAR MOMENTUM10.1 Orbital Angular Momentum .10.1.1 Uncertainty Principle10.2 Zeeman Effect . . . . . . . . .10.3 Algebraic Method . . . . . . .159159162163164

4CONTENTS10.4 Spin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10.4.1 Spin 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10.4.2 Spin-Orbit Coupling . . . . . .10.5 Addition of Angular Momentum . . .10.5.1 Wave Functions for Singlet and10.5.2 Clebsch-Gordon Coefficients . .10.6 Total Angular Momentum . . . . . . .10.6.1 LS and jj Coupling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Triplet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Spin. . . . . . .11 SHELL MODELS11.1 Atomic Shell Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11.1.1 Degenerate Shell Model . . . . . . . . . . .11.1.2 Non-Degenerate Shell Model . . . . . . . .11.1.3 Non-Degenerate Model with Surface Effects11.1.4 Spectra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11.2 Hartree-Fock Self Consistent Field Method . . . .11.3 Nuclear Shell Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11.3.1 Nuclear Spin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11.4 Quark Shell Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .States. . . . . . . . . 18118212 DIRAC NOTATION12.1 Finite Vector Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.1.1 Real Vector Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.1.2 Complex Vector Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.1.3 Matrix Representation of Vectors . . . . . . . .12.1.4 One-Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.2 Infinite Vector Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.3 Operators and Matrices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.3.1 Matrix Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.3.2 Hermitian Conjugate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.3.3 Hermitian Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.3.4 Expectation Values and Transition Amplitudes12.4 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics (Fancy Version) . .12.5 Uncertainty Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18318318318518818818919119119419519719819813 TIME-INDEPENDENT PERTURBATION THEORY, HYDROGEN ATOM, POSITRONIUM, STRUCTURE OF HADRONS20113.1 Non-degenerate Perturbation Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20413.2 Degenerate Perturbation Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208

CONTENTS13.313.413.513.613.713.813.9513.2.1 Two-fold Degeneracy . . . . . . . .13.2.2 Another Approach . . . . . . . . .13.2.3 Higher Order Degeneracies . . . .Fine Structure of Hydrogen . . . . . . . .13.3.1 1-Body Relativistic Correction . .13.3.2 Two-Body Relativistic Correction13.3.3 Spin-Orbit Coupling . . . . . . . .Zeeman effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Stark effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hyperfine splitting . . . . . . . . . . . . .Lamb shift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Positronium and Muonium . . . . . . . .Quark Model of Hadrons . . . . . . . . . .20921121221221221621722022122122122122114 VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE, HELIUM ATOM, MOLECULES22314.1 Variational Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22314.2 Helium Atom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22314.3 Molecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22315 WKB APPROXIMATION, NUCLEAR15.1 Generalized Wave Functions . . . . . . .15.2 Finite Potential Barrier . . . . . . . . .15.3 Gamow’s Theory of Alpha Decay . . . .ALPHA DECAY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22522523023116 TIME-DEPENDENT PERTURBATION THEORY, LASERS23516.1 Equivalent Schrödinger Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23616.2 Dyson Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24016.3 Constant Perturbation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24116.4 Harmonic Perturbation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24416.5 Photon Absorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24716.5.1 Radiation Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24716.6 Photon Emission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24916.7 Selection Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24916.8 Lasers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25017 SCATTERING, NUCLEAR REACTIONS25117.1 Cross Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25117.2 Scattering Amplitude . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25217.2.1 Calculation of cl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255

6CONTENTS17.3 Phase Shift . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17.4 Integral Scattering Theory . . . . . .17.4.1 Lippman-Schwinger Equation17.4.2 Scattering Amplitude . . . .17.4.3 Born Approximation . . . . .17.5 Nuclear Reactions . . . . . . . . . .25725925926126226418 SOLIDS AND QUANTUM STATISTICS26518.1 Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26518.2 Quantum Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26519 SUPERCONDUCTIVITY26720 ELEMENTARY PARTICLES26921 chapter 1 problems27121.1 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27121.2 Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27221.3 Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27322 chapter 2 problems28122.1 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28122.2 Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28222.3 Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28323 chapter 3 problems28723.1 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28723.2 Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28823.3 Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28924 chapter 4 problems29124.1 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29124.2 Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29224.3 Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293

Chapter 1WAVE FUNCTIONQuantum Mechanics is such a radical and revolutionary physical theory thatnowadays physics is divided into two main parts, namely Classical Physicsversus Quantum Physics. Classical physics consists of any theory whichdoes not incorporate quantum mechanics. Examples of classical theories areNewtonian mechanics (F ma), classical electrodynamics (Maxwell’s equations), fluid dynamics (Navier-Stokes equation), Special Relativity, GeneralRelativity, etc. Yes, that’s right; Einstein’s theories of special and generalrelativity are regarded as classical theories because they don’t incorporatequantum mechanics. Classical physics is still an active area of research todayand incorporates such topics as chaos [Gleick 1987] and turbulence in fluids.Physicists have succeeded in incorporating quantum mechanics into manyclassical theories and so we now have Quantum Electrodynamics (combination of classical electrodynamics and quantum mechanics) and QuantumField Theory (combination of special relativity and quantum mechanics)which are both quantum theories. (Unfortunately no one has yet succeededin combining general relativity with quantum mechanics.)I am assuming that everyone has already taken a course in ModernPhysics. (Some excellent textbooks are [Tipler 1992, Beiser 1987].) Insuch a course you will have studied such phenomena as black-body radiation, atomic spectroscopy, the photoelectric effect, the Compton effect, theDavisson-Germer experiment, and tunnelling phenomena all of which cannotbe explained in the framework of classical physics. (For a review of thesetopics see references [Tipler 1992, Beiser 1987] and chapter 40 of Serway[Serway 1990] and chapter 1 of Gasiorowicz [Gasiorowicz 1996] and chapter2 of Liboff [Liboff 1992].)7

8CHAPTER 1. WAVE FUNCTIONThe most dramatic feature of quantum mechanics is that it is a probabilistic theory. We shall explore this in much more detail later, however toget started we should review some of the basics of probability theory.1.1Probability Theory(This section follows the discussion of Griffiths [Griffiths 1995].)College instructors always have to turn in student grades at the end ofeach semester. In order to compare the class of the Fall semester to the classof the Spring semester one could stare at dozens of grades for awhile. It’smuch better though to average all the grades and compare the averages.Suppose we have a class of 15 students who receive grades from 0 to 10.Suppose 3 students get 10, 2 students get 9, 4 students get 8, 5 students get7, and 1 student gets 5. Let’s write this asN (15) 0N (14) 0N (13) 0N (12) 0N (11) 0N (10) 3N (9) 2N (8) 4N (7) 5N (6) 0N (5) 1N (4) 0N (3) 0N (2) 0N (1) 0N (0) 0where N (j) is the number of students receiving a grade of j. The histogramof this distribution is drawn in Figure 1.1.The total number of students, by the way, is given byN XN (j)(1.1)j 01.1.1Mean, Average, Expectation ValueWe want to calculate the average grade which we denote by the symbol j̄ orhji. The mean or average is given by the formula1 Xj̄ hji j(1.2)N allwherePj means add them all up separately asall1(10 10 10 9 9 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 5)15 8.0(1.3)hji

1.1. PROBABILITY THEORY9Thus the mean or average grade is 8.0.Instead of writing many numbers over again in (1.3) we could writej̄ 1[(10 3) (9 2) (8 4) (7 5) (5 1)]15(1.4)This suggests re-writing the formula for average ashji j̄ 1 XjN (j)N j 0(1.5)where N (j) number of times the value j occurs. The reason we go from0 to is because many of the N (j) are zero. Example N (3) 0. No onescored 3.We can also write (1.4) asµ3j̄ 10 15¶µ2 9 15¶µ4 8 15¶µ5 7 15¶µ1 5 15¶(1.6)3where for example 15is the probability that a random student gets a gradeof 10. Defining the probability asP (j) we havehji j̄ N (j)N XjP (j)(1.7)(1.8)j 0Any of the formulas (1.2), (1.5) or (1.8) will serve equally well for calculatingthe mean or average. However in quantum mechanics we will prefer usingthe last one (1.8) in terms of probability.³ Note that when talking about probabilities, they must all add up to 13245115 15 15 15 15 1 . That is XP (j) 1(1.9)j 0Student grades are somewhat different to a series of actual measurementswhich is what we are more concerned with in quantum mechanics. If abunch of students each go out and measure the length of a fence, then thej in (1.1) will represent each measurement. Or if one person measures the

10CHAPTER 1. WAVE FUNCTIONenergy of an electron several times then the j in (1.1) represents each energymeasurement. (do Problem 1.1)In quantum mechanics we use the word expectation value. It meansnothing more than the word average or mean. That is you have to makea series of measurements to get it. Unfortunately, as Griffiths points out[p.7, 15, Griffiths 1995] the name expectation value makes you think thatit is the value you expect after making only one measurement (i.e. mostprobable value). This is not correct. Expectation value is the average ofsingle measurements made on a set of identically prepared systems. This ishow it is used in quantum mechanics.1.1.2Average of a FunctionSuppose that instead of the average of the student grades, you wanted theaverage of the square of the grades. That’s easy. It’s just X1 X 21 X2j j N (j) j 2 P (j)j̄ hj i N allN j 0j 022(1.10)Note that in general the average of the square is not the square of the average.hj 2 i 6 hji2(1.11)In general for any function f of j we havehf (j)i Xf (j)P (j)(1.12)j 01.1.3Mean, Median, ModeYou can skip this section if you want to. Given that we have discussed themean, I just want to mention median and mode in case you happen to comeacross them.The median is simply the mid-point of the data. 50% of the data pointslie above the median and 50% lie below. The grades in our previous examplewere 10, 10, 10, 9, 9, 8, 8, 8, 8, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 5. There are 15 data points,so point number 8 is the mid-point which is a grade of 8. (If there are aneven number of data points, the median is obtained by averaging the middletwo data points.) The median is well suited to student grades. It tells youexactly where the middle point lies.

1.1. PROBABILITY THEORY11The mode is simply the most frequently occurring data point. In ourgrade example the mode is 7 because this occurs 5 times. (Sometimes datawill have points occurring with the same frequency. If this happens with 2data points and they are widely separated we have what we call a bi-nodaldistribution.)For a normal distribution the mean, median and mode will occur at thesame point, whereas for a skewed distribution they will occur at differentpoints.(see Figure 1.2)1.1.4Standard Deviation and UncertaintySome distributions are more spread out than others. (See Fig. 1.5 of [Griffiths 1995].) By “spread out” we mean that if one distribution is more spreadout than another then most of its points are further away from the averagethan the other distribution. The “distance” of a particular point from theaverage can be written j j hji(1.13)But for points with a value less than the average this distance will be negative. Let’s get rid of the sign by talking about the squared distance( j)2 (j hji)2(1.14)Then it doesn’t matter if a point is larger or smaller than the average.Points an equal distance away (whether larger or smaller) will have thesame squared distance.Now let’s turn the notion of “spread out” into a concise mathematicalstatement. If one distribution is more spread out than another then theaverage distances of all points will be bigger than the other. But we don’twant the average to be negative so let’s use squared distance. Thus if onedistribution is more spread out than another then the average squared distance of all the points will be bigger than the other. This average squareddistance will be our mathematical statement for how spread out a particulardistribution is.The average squared distance is called the variance and is given the symbol σ 2 . The square root of the variance, σ, is called the standard deviation.The quantum mechanical word for standard deviation is uncertainty, and weusually use the symbol to denote it. As with the word expectation value,the word uncertainty is misleading, although these are the words found in

12CHAPTER 1. WAVE FUNCTIONthe literature of quantum mechanics. It’s much better (more precise) to usethe words average and standard deviation instead of expectation valueand uncertainty. Also it’s much better (more precise) to use the symbol σrather than , otherwise we get confused with (1.13). (Nevertheless manyquantum mechanics books use expectation value, uncertainty and .)The average squared distance or variance is simple to define. It is1 X( j)2N allσ 2 h( j)2 i 1 X(j hji)2N all X (j hji)2 P (j)(1.15)j 0Note: Some books use N 1 1 instead of N1 in (1.15). But if N 1 1 is usedthen equation (1.16) won’t work out unless N 1 1 is used in the mean aswell. For large samples N 1 1 N1 . The use of N 1 1 comes from a dataset where only N 1 data points are independent. (E.g. percentages ofpeople walking through 4 colored doors.) Suppose there are 10 people and4 doors colored red, green, blue and white. If 2 people walk through the reddoor and 3 people through green and 1 person through blue then we deducethat 4 people must have walked through the white door. If we are makingmeasurements of people then this last data set is not a valid independentmeasurement. However in quantum mechanics all of our measurements areindependent and so we use N1 .Example 1.1.1 Using equation (1.15), calculate the variance forthe student grades discussed above.Solution We find that the average grade was 8.0. Thus the“distance” of each j j hji is 10 10 8 2, 9 1, 8 0, 7 1, 6 2, 5 3 and the squared distancesare ( 10)2 4, ( 9)2 1, ( 8)2 0, ( 7)2 1, ( 6)2 4,( 5)2 9. The average of these areµσ2 34 15¶µ2 1 15¶µ4 0 15¶

1.1. PROBABILITY THEORYµ 1 13515¶µ 9 115¶ 1.87However this way of calculating the variance can be a pain in the neckespecially for large samples. Let’s find a simpler formula which will give usthe answer more quickly. Expand (1.15) asσ2 X³X j 2 2jhji hji2 P (j)j 2 P (j) 2hjiXjP (j) hji2XP (j)where we take hji and hji2 outside the sum because they are just numbers(hji 8.0 and hji2 64.0 in above example) which have already beenPPsummed over. Now jP (j) hji and P (j) 1. Thusσ 2 hj 2 i 2hji2 hji2givingσ 2 hj 2 i hji2(1.16)Example 1.1.2 Repeat example 1.1.1 using equation (1.16).Solution1[(100 3) (81 2) (64 4) (49 5) (25 1)]15 65.87hj 2 i hji2 82 64σ 2 hj 2 i hji2 65.87 64 1.87in agreement with example 1.1.1. (do Problem 1.2)

141.1.5CHAPTER 1. WAVE FUNCTIONProbability DensityIn problems 1.1 and 1.2 we encountered an example where a continuous variable (the length of a fence) rather than a discrete variable (integer values ofstudent grades) is used. A better method for dealing with continuous variables is to use probability densities rather than probabilities. The probabilitythat the value x lies between the values a and b is given byPab Zbρ(x)dx(1.17)aThis equation defines the probability density ρ(x) The quantity ρ(x)dx isthus the probability that a given value lies between x and x dx. This Ris justlike the ordinary density ρ of water. The total mass of water is M ρdVwhere ρdV is the mass of water between volumes V and V dV .Our old discrete formulas get replaced with new continuous formulas, asfollows:Z XP (j) 1 j 0hji Xj 0hf (j)i X X ρ(x)dx 1jP (j) hxi Z Zxρ(x)dxj 0(1.19) f (x)ρ(x)dx(j hji)2 P (j) σ 2 ( x)2 hj 2 i hji2(1.18) f (j)P (j) hf (x)i j 0σ 2 h( j)2 i Z (1.20)(x hxi)2 ρ(x)dx hx2 i hxi2(1.21)In discrete notation j is the measurement, but in continuous notation themeasured variable is x. (do Problem 1.3)1.2Postulates of Quantum MechanicsMost physical theories are based on just a couple of fundamental equations.For instance, Newtonian mechanics is based on F ma, classical electrodynamics is based on Maxwell’s equations and general relativity is based on theEinstein equations Gµν 8πG Tµν . When you take a course on Newtonian

1.2. POSTULATES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS15mechanics, all you ever do is solve F ma. In a course on electromagnetism you spend all your time just solving Maxwell’s equations. Thus thesefundamental equations are the theory. All the rest is just learning how tosolve these fundamental equations in a wide variety of circumstances. Thefundamental equation of quantum mechanics is the Schrödinger equation h̄2 2 Ψ Ψ U Ψ ih̄22m x twhich I have written for a single particle (of mass m) moving in a potentialU in one dimension x. (We will consider more particles and more dimensionslater.) The symbol Ψ, called the wave function, is a function of space andtime Ψ(x, t) which is why partial derivatives appear.It’s important to understand that these fundamental equations cannot bederived from anywhere else. They are physicists’ guesses (or to be fancy, postulates) as to how nature works. We check that the guesses (postulates) arecorrect by comparing their predictions to experiment. Nevertheless, you willoften find “derivations” of the fundamental equations scattered throughoutphysics books. This is OK. The authors are simply trying to provide deeperunderstanding, but it is good to remember that these are not fundamentalderivations. Our good old equations like F ma, Maxwell’s equations andthe Schrödinger equation are postulates and that’s that. Nothing more. Theyare sort of like the definitions that mathematicians state at the beginning ofthe proof of a theorem. They cannot be derived from anything else.Quantum Mechanics is sufficiently complicated that the Schrödinger equation is not the only postulate. There are others (see inside cover of this book).The wave function needs some postulates of its own simply to understandit. The wave function Ψ is the fundamental quantity that we always wish tocalculate in quantum mechanics.Actually all of the fundamental equations of physical theories usuallyhave a fundamental quantity that we wish to calculate given a fundamentalinput. In Newtonian physics, F ma is the fundamental equation and theacceleration a is the fundamental quantity that we always want to knowgiven an input force F . The acceleration a is different for different forcesF . Once we have obtained the acceleration we can calculate lots of otherinteresting goodies such as the velocity and the displacement as a functionof time. In classical electromagnetism the Maxwell equations are the fundamental equations and the fundamental quantities that we always want arethe electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields. These always depend on the fundamental input which is the charge (ρ) and current (j) distribution. Different

16CHAPTER 1. WAVE FUNCTIONρ and j produce different E and B. In general relativity, the fundamentalequations are the Einstein equations (Gµν 8πGTµν ) and the fundamental quantity that we always want is the metric tensor gµν , which tells us howspacetime is curved. (gµν is buried inside Gµν ). The fundamental input isthe energy-momentum tensor Tµν which describes the distribution of matter.Different Tµν produces different gµν .Similarly the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics is the Schrodinger equation and the fundamental input is the potential U . (This isrelated to force via F U or F U x in one dimension. See any bookon classical mechanics. [Chow 1995, Fowles 1986, Marion 1988, Goldstein1980].) Different input potentials U give different values of the fundamentalquantity which is the wave function Ψ. Once we have the wave function wecan calculate all sorts of other interesting goodies such as energies, lifetimes,tunnelling probabilities, cross sections, etc.In Newtonian mechanics and electromagnetism the fundamental quantities are the acceleration and the electric and magnetic fields. Now we all canagree on what the meaning of acceleration and electric field is and so that’sthe end of the story. However with the wave function it’s entirely a differentmatter. We have to agree on what we mean it to be at the very outset. Themeaning of the wave function has occupied some of the greatest minds inphysics (Heisenberg, Einstein, Dirac, Feynman, Born and others).In this book we will not write down all of the postulates of quantummechanics in one go (but if you want this look at the inside cover). Insteadwe will develop the postulates as we go along, because they are more understandable if you already know some quantum theory. Let’s look at a simpleversion of the first postulate.Postulate 1:To each state of a physical system there corresponds a wave function Ψ(x, t).That’s simple enough. In classical mechanics each state of a physical systemis specified by two variables, namely position x(t) and momentum p(t) whichare both functions of the one variable time t. (And we all “know” whatposition and momentum mean, so we don’t need fancy postulates to saywhat they are.) In quantum mechanics each state of a physical system isspecified by only one variable, namely the wave function Ψ(x, t) which is afunction of the two variables position x and time t.Footnote: In classical mechanics the state of a system is specified by x(t)

1.2. POSTULATES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS17and p(t) or Γ(x, p). In 3-dimensions this is x(t) and p (t) or Γ(x, y, px , py )or Γ(r, θ, pr , pθ ). In quantum mechanics we shall see that the uncertaintyprinciple does not allow us to specify x and p simultaneously. Thus inquantum mechanics our good coordinates will be things like E, L2 , Lz , etc.rather than x, p. Thus Ψ will be written as Ψ(E, L2 , Lz · · ·) rather thanΨ(x, p). (E is the energy and L is the angular momentum.) Furthermoreall information regarding the system resides in Ψ. We Rwill see later that theexpectation value of any physical observable is hQi Ψ Q̂Ψdx. Thus thewave function will always give the values of any other physical observablethat we require.At this stage we don’t know what Ψ means but we will specify its meaningin a later postulate.Postulate 2:The time development of the wave function i

Quantum Mechanics is such a radical and revolutionary physical theory that nowadays physics is divided into two main parts, namely Classical Physics versus Quantum Physics. Classical physics consists of any theory which does not incorporate quantum mechanics. Examples of classical theories are Newtonian mechanics (F ma), classical .

Related Documents:

1. Introduction - Wave Mechanics 2. Fundamental Concepts of Quantum Mechanics 3. Quantum Dynamics 4. Angular Momentum 5. Approximation Methods 6. Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics 7. Theory of chemical bonding 8. Scattering Theory 9. Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Suggested Reading: J.J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin/Cummings 1985

quantum mechanics relativistic mechanics size small big Finally, is there a framework that applies to situations that are both fast and small? There is: it is called \relativistic quantum mechanics" and is closely related to \quantum eld theory". Ordinary non-relativistic quan-tum mechanics is a good approximation for relativistic quantum mechanics

Quantum Mechanics 6 The subject of most of this book is the quantum mechanics of systems with a small number of degrees of freedom. The book is a mix of descriptions of quantum mechanics itself, of the general properties of systems described by quantum mechanics, and of techniques for describing their behavior.

1. Quantum bits In quantum computing, a qubit or quantum bit is the basic unit of quantum information—the quantum version of the classical binary bit physically realized with a two-state device. A qubit is a two-state (or two-level) quantum-mechanical system, one of the simplest quantum systems displaying the peculiarity of quantum mechanics.

1969/1970 milosevic sava faculty of mathematics and natural sciences, belgrade 1969/1970 miskovic svetlana factory “beogradski pamucni kombi-nat”, belgrade 1969/1970 ognjenovic Vida artists, creators and experts, belgrade 1969/1970 popovic bojan institute of economics of investments, belgrade

CITY OF BELGRADE CITYWIDE TWO YEAR TERM (VOTE FOR ONE) ROBERTA C FOGINTHEMORNING RUSSELL C. NELSON FOR COUNCIL MEMBER CITY OF BELGRADE WARD 1 FOUR YEAR TERM (VOTE FOR ONE) BALLOT ISSUES CITY OF BELGRADE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2018-8 Shall the City of Belgrade, Montana adopt Ordinance No. 2018-8 authorizing and regulating the keeping of domestic

An excellent way to ease yourself into quantum mechanics, with uniformly clear expla-nations. For this course, it covers both approximation methods and scattering. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics James Binney and David Skinner, The Physics of Quantum Mechanics Weinberg, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics

2003–2008 Mountain Goat Software Scrum roles and responsibilities Defines the features of the product, decides on release date and content Is responsible for the profitability of the product (ROI) Prioritizes features according to market value Can change features and priority every sprint Accepts or rejects work results Product Owner .