Annexes - EVALSDGs
AnnexesProgressing nationalSDGs implementation:An independent assessment of the voluntary national review reports submitted tothe United Nations High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development in 2017The Second Edition in annual series commissioned by civil society organizations
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 1. VNR reports revieweda1Annex 1. VNR reports reviewedAll VNR reports are available through the United Nations SustainableDevelopment Knowledge Platform.Table A1. Provides an overview of the countries reviewed. Aruba, Curaçao, SintMaarten and the Netherlands submitted a joint report, making the number ofcountries reporting at the 2017 HLPF 45. Of these countries, six are low-income,ten lower-middle-income, 11 upper-middle-income and 18 are high-incomecountries – according to World Bank country classifications.An equal number of the countries reviewed are from Asia and Latin Americaand the Caribbean1 with 14 each according to United Nations classifications.Countries from Europe make up the next largest share at ten, while the sevenAfrican countries reporting are from sub-Saharan Africa.1Three of the 14 Latin America and Caribbean countries are from the Caribbean.
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 1. VNR reports reviewedTABLE A1. COUNTRIES REVIEWED IN THE ANALYSIS OF 2017 VNR REPORTSCOUNTRYREGION1SUB-REGION2INCOME LEVEL3AfghanistanAsiaSouthern AsiaLow-income countryArgentinaAmericasSouth AmericaUpper-middle-income countryArubaAmericasCaribbeanHigh-income countryAzerbaijanAsiaWestern AsiaUpper-middle-income countryBangladeshAsiaSouthern AsiaLower-middle-income countryBelgiumEuropeWestern EuropeHigh-income countryBelizeAmericasCentral AmericaUpper-middle-income countryBeninAfricaWestern AfricaLow-income countryBotswanaAfricaSouthern AfricaUpper-middle-income countryBrazilAmericasSouth AmericaUpper-middle-income countryChileAmericasSouth AmericaHigh-income countryCosta RicaAmericasCentral AmericaUpper-middle-income countryCuraçaoAmericasCaribbeanHigh-income countryCyprusAsiaWestern AsiaHigh-income countryCzech RepublicEuropeEastern EuropeHigh-income countryDenmarkEuropeChannel IslandsHigh-income countryEl SalvadorAmericasCentral AmericaLower-middle-income countryEthiopiaAfricaEastern AfricaLow-income countryGuatemalaAmericasCentral AmericaLower-middle-income countryHondurasAmericasCentral AmericaLower-middle-income countryIndiaAsiaSouthern AsiaLower-middle-income countryIndonesiaAsiaSouth-eastern AsiaLower-middle-income countryItalyEuropeSouthern EuropeHigh-income countryJapanAsiaEastern AsiaHigh-income countryJordanAsiaWestern AsiaLower-middle-income countryKenyaAfricaEastern AfricaLower-middle-income countryLuxembourgEuropeWestern EuropeHigh-income countryMalaysiaAsiaSouth-eastern AsiaUpper-middle-income countryMaldivesAsiaSouthern AsiaUpper-middle-income countrya2
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 1. VNR reports reviewedCOUNTRYREGION1SUB-REGION2INCOME LEVEL3MonacoEuropeWestern EuropeHigh-income countryNepalAsiaSouthern AsiaLow-income countryNetherlandsEuropeWestern EuropeHigh-income countryNigeriaAfricaWestern AfricaLower-middle-income countryPanamaAmericasCentral AmericaUpper-middle-income countryPeruAmericasSouth AmericaUpper-middle-income countryPortugalEuropeSouthern EuropeHigh-income countryQatarAsiaWestern AsiaHigh-income countrySloveniaEuropeSouthern EuropeHigh-income countrySint MaartenAmericasCaribbeanHigh-income countrySwedenEuropeChannel IslandsHigh-income countryTajikistanAsiaCentral AsiaLower-middle-income countryThailandAsiaSouth-eastern AsiaUpper-middle-income countryTogoAfricaWestern AfricaLow-income countryUruguayAmericasSouth AmericaHigh-income countryZimbabweAfricaEastern AfricaLow-income country(Footnotes)1According to UN classifications.2According to UN classifications.3According to World Bank classifications for the 2018 fiscal year.a3
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. Methodologya4Annex 2. MethodologyA2.1 Research teamA2.2. Research approachThe research was led by Shannon Kindornay, IndependentWith the exception of Belarus, the research team examined all VNRConsultant and Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University.reports to the HLPF in 2017, according to the framework outlined inMs. Kindornay developed the framework for analysis, building on theTable A2.1. The framework includes ten pillars of analysis:pillars of analysis in the 2016 review.2 More specifically, this secondedition builds on the eight pillars of analysis from the first edition byINCORPORATION OF THE 2030 AGENDA INTOadding two more that focus on partnerships to realise Agenda 2030NATIONAL FRAMEWORKS AND POLICIESand the means of implementation. It also provides an annex (Annex3) of two-page profiles for the country VNR reports reviewed. Shereviewed 31 of the English language reports, managed contributionsfrom other members of the research team and carried out theLEADERSHIP, GOVERNANCE ANDINSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMSanalysis that informs this review.Javier Surasky, Governance for Development Research AreaCoordinator from the Centro de Pensamiento EstratégicoBASELINE ORGAP ANALYSISInternacional, CEPEI reviewed 11 reports for Latin America and theCaribbean3 (all Spanish reports with the exception of Belize andINTEGRATION ANDBrazil), provided written inputs to the review, including best practicePOLICY COHERENCEcase studies for the region and country profiles, and commentedon a draft version of the report. Nathalie Risse, Thematic expert onthe 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the InternationalInstitute for Sustainable Development (IISD), reviewed the FrenchLEAVE NO ONEBEHINDreports for Benin, Luxembourg, and Monaco, prepared the countryprofiles and provided comments on a draft version of the report.RAISING AWARENESS AND CREATINGOWNERSHIP OF THE 2030 AGENDASTAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN THEDEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL PRIORITIESAND FOLLOW-UP AND REVIEW PROCESSESIMPLEMENTING THE2030 AGENDAPARTNERSHIP TOREALISE THE SDGSMEASUREMENTAND REPORTING2Cutter, 2016.3Argentina, Belize, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay.
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyIn addition to these pillars, the framework includes an assessmentof the extent to which countries followed the Secretary General’scommon reporting guidelines.The framework was initially tested against four VNR reports. Minorrevisions where then made to the framework, largely in the formof options for set-answer questions and the addition of morecomponents of analysis. For open ended components of the analysis(instances in which researchers could not provide a set answersuch as yes or no), text was drawn directly from the VNR reportsto ensure the highest level of accuracy. In some cases, researchersa5A2.3 Data sourcesAll reports are available through the United Nations SustainableDevelopment Knowledge Platform. The analysis presented in thisreview is based solely on official VNR reports and where available,civil society reports. Secondary literature was used in a limitednumber of instances to show consistency between the analysis inthe review and those carried out by others. No additional researchwas conducted to verify the accuracy and confirm the validity of theinformation governments included in their reports. This is a clearlimitation of the findings.paraphrased information when the text from VNR reports wasCivil society reports are available for 18 of the countries reviewedmore than 200 words. In addition, information from available civilin 2017. Reports for Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Chile, Czechsociety reports was also included in the framework. For set answerRepublic, India, Japan, Kenya, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Nepal, Nigeria,components, relevant information was listed in a ‘notes’ section ofThailand, The Netherlands, Togo, and Zimbabwe can be found on thethe framework. For open ended components, text from civil societyAction for Sustainable Development website. In some cases, morereports is available directly following the text from VNR reports. Tothan one organisation responded to the survey prepared by Actionensure consistency in the analysis, all data was reviewed by the leadfor Sustainable Development on 2030 Agenda implementation andresearcher and clarifications were sought from the research teamthe VNR or an additional shadow report was prepared. India andwhere necessary.Nepal have two reports each as a result. Spotlight reports wereprepared for Bangladesh, Brazil and Kenya available on the website.In addition, Cyprus and Denmark included a civil society report in theannex of their VNRs reports, while Slovenia included a chapter in itsreport written by the National Youth Council of Slovenia, outliningyouth priorities for the SDGs. Nigeria’s VNR report included a CSOvalidation statement as an annex.
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a6Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 HLPFCATEGORYSUB-COMPONENTDESCRIPTIONOPTIONSCountry namen/aProvide country nameShort version, e.g. Ethiopia rather thanFederal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.Regionn/aBased on United Nations StatisticsRegion as stipulated in the classification.Division classifications.Sub-RegionIncome leveln/an/aBased on United Nations StatisticsIntermediate region as stipulated in theDivision classifications.classification.World Bank classification for theLow-income country2018 fiscal year.Lower-middle-income countryUpper-middle-income countryHigh-income countryIncorporationSDGs in nationalRefers to how governments areSDGs incorporated into nationalof the SDGsframeworks andincorporating the SDGs into nationaldevelopment plans and related policiesinto nationalpoliciesframeworks and policies broadly.and frameworksframeworks andpoliciesSDGs incorporated through a nationalSDG implementation strategySDGs incorporated into nationaldevelopment plans and related policiesand frameworks and through the use of anational SDG implementation strategySDGs have not been incorporated througha national strategy or into nationaldevelopment plans and related policiesand frameworksNot articulated in VNR report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a7Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 rationEvidence of change toRefers to the extent to which theProvide summary assessment. Evidenceof the SDGsrealise the SDGsVNR report shows that steps areof a change in approach could include: 1)being taken to deliver the SDGs.changes to key policies and frameworks;into nationalframeworks andand /or the 2) creation of particularpoliciesinitiatives to address a gap identified asa result of the SDGs. Where evidence ofchange is limited, ask whether the reportappears to be business as usual with anSDG spin and provide your assessment.IncorporationReference toWhether the VNR report refers toof the SDGsprinciples of Agendathe use of a human rights basedinto national2030 – human rightsapproach in the implementation offrameworks andbased approachthe SDGs.IncorporationReference toWhether the VNR report refers to theof the SDGsprinciples of Agendauniversality of Agenda 2030.into national2030 – universalityYesNopoliciesYesNoframeworks andpoliciesIncorporationReference toWhether the VNR report refers toof the SDGsprinciples of Agendaleaving no one behind.into national2030 - leave no oneframeworks andbehindpoliciesYesNo
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a8Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 hip,GovernanceRefers to the use of existing or newExisting council or committeegovernance andarrangement forgovernance mechanisms to overseeinstitutionaldelivering the SDGsSDG implementation and ensuringmechanismscoordination.Creation of new council or committeeNo council or committee withimplementation through governmentinstitutionsCouncil or committee established withimplementation through lead departmentExisting council or committee withimplementation through lead departmentCreation of specialised officeCouncil or committee established withimplementation through governmentinstitutionsOtherUnclear from the VNR reportNot articulated in the VNR reportLeadership,Leadership on SDGRefers to the key government actorgovernance andimplementationresponsible for leading on SDGinstitutionalmechanismsimplementation.Head of government or stateIndividual cabinet ministerMultiple cabinet ministersParliamentary committeeSpecific SDG implementation body orcommittee outside parliamentLead departmentOtherNot articulated in the VNR report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a9Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 hip,Non-state actorRefers to if and how non-stateProvide direct text from the VNR reportgovernance andofficial engagement inactors are included in official SDGor if longer than 200 words, provide ainstitutionalSDG implementationimplementation governing sLeadership,Examples of bestExamples of best practice asProvide direct text from the VNR orgovernance andpractice in developingidentified by reviewers.if longer than 200 words, provide ainstitutionalinclusive governancemechanismsarrangements for SDGsummary.implementationLeadership,Regional coordinationExtent to which the country isgovernance andon the SDGsengaged in coordinating efforts atinstitutionalthe regional level.mechanismsParticipatesDoes not participateNot articulated in the VNR reportLeadership,Activities at regionalDescription of how regionalProvide direct text from the VNR reportgovernance andlevelcoordination on the SDGs isor if longer than 200 words, provide aoccurring.summary.institutionalmechanismsVNR makes no mention of regionalactivitiesLeadership,Engagement inDescription of the grouping to whichProvide direct text from the VNR reportgovernance andspecial countrythe country belongs (for example,or if longer than 200 words, provide ainstitutionalgroupings on the SDGland locked, small island, leastsummary.mechanismsdeveloped, etc.) and the activitiesit is pursuing as noted in the VNRVNR report makes no mention ofreport.participation in country groupingsAssessment carried out for all SDGsBaseline or gapGap analysis orEvidence that the country conductedanalysisbaseline study carrieda gap analysis or baseline study tooutassess existing policies in relation tothe SDGs.Assessment carried out for some SDGsAssessment plannedNo assessment carried outNot articulated in the VNR report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a10Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 e or gapContent of the gapDescription of the key elementsProvide direct text from the VNR reportanalysisanalysis/baselineexamined through the gap analysisor if longer than 200 words, provide astudyor baseline study conducted.summary.No assessment carried outNot articulated in the VNR reportBaseline or gapGaps identifiedanalysisAreas identified in the VNR reportProvide direct text from the VNR reportwhere additional progress isor if longer than 200 words, provide aneeded as a result of the gap/summary.baseline analysis. This information issometimes found in the descriptionof individual goals (i.e. areas wheremore efforts needed).Integration andOverall SDG coverageRefers to the composition of SDGspolicy coherenceby the VNRexamined in the VNR report.No assessment carried outNot articulated in the VNR reportAll SDGs examinedSDGs covered by the HLPF themeexaminedLimited set of country selected SDGsexaminedSDGs not examined
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a11Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 tion andSpecific SDGsRefers to the specific SDGs examinedAll 17 SDGspolicy coherenceexamined by the VNRin the VNR report.List the specific SDGs examined, by shorttitle only and include their numbering,separated by semi-colons, no periodat end of list. (1. No poverty; 2. Zerohunger; 3. Good health and wellbeing; 4. Quality education; 5. Genderequality; 6. Clean water and sanitation;7. Affordable and clean energy; 8.Decent work and economic growth; 9.Industry, innovation and infrastructure;10. Reduced inequalities; 11. Sustainablecities and communities; 12. Responsibleconsumption and production; 13. Climateaction; 14. Life below water; 15. Lifeon land; 16. Peace, justice and stronginstitutions; 17. Partnerships for the goals)No specific goal-by-goal analysis butrather analysis based on people, planet,prosperity, peace and partnershipNo specific goal-by-goal analysis butrather analysis based on country prioritiesIntegration andpolicy coherenceDetailed analysisRefers to the level of detail in whichDetailed examination of all or most of thethe VNR report examines the SDGs.goals, targets and indicators mentioned inthe reportSummary of examination of goals, targetsand indicators provided with limiteddetailsNo detailed examination or summaryof the goals, targets and indicatorsmentioned in the report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a12Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 tion andEconomic, socialExtent to which the VNR reportEqual attention to economic, social andpolicy coherenceand environmentaladdresses all three dimensionsenvironmental dimensionsdimensions ofof sustainable development –sustainableeconomic, social and environmentalAll dimensions addressed but greaterdevelopment– in the report.focus on economicAll dimensions addressed but greaterfocus on socialAll dimensions addressed but greaterfocus on environmentalAll dimensions addressed but limitedfocus on socialAll dimensions addressed but limitedfocus on economicAll dimensions addressed but limitedfocus on environmentalOnly social dimensions addressedOnly economic dimensions addressedOnly environmental dimensions addressedIntegration andIntegration in SDGExtent to which the analysis ofReference to applicable linkages betweenpolicy coherenceimplementationspecific SDGs in the VNR reporteconomic, social and environmentalreflects the integrated nature of thedimensions in analysis of specific goals,agenda.targets and indicatorsLimited reference to linkages betweeneconomic, social and environmentaldimensions in analysis of goals, targetsand indicatorsNo mention of linkages betweeneconomic, social and environmentaldimensions in analysis of goals, targetsand indicatorsNo detailed analysis of specific goals,targets and indicators
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a13Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 tion andExamples of goodExamples of best practice asProvide direct text from the VNR reportpolicy coherencepractice in takingidentified by reviewers.or if longer than 200 words, provide aan integratedsummary.approach to SDGimplementationIntegration andReference toWhether the report refers toYespolicy coherencepolicy coherencepolicy coherence for sustainablefor sustainabledevelopment:NodevelopmentIntegration andAssessment ofWhether the report includes aAssessment of domestic and foreignpolicy coherencedomestic and foreignsystematic assessment of howpolicies on realisation of SDGs globallypolicies on SDGdomestic and foreign policies impactoutcomesthe realisation of the SDGs in countryAssessment of domestic policies onand globally.realisation of SDGs globallyAssessment of foreign policies onrealisation of SDG globallyNo assessment of domestic or foreignpolicies on realisation of SDGs globallyIntegration andOverall approachReviewer summary of howProvide direct text from the VNR reportpolicy coherenceto policy coherencepolicy coherence for sustainableor if longer than 200 words, provide ato sustainabledevelopment is addressed in thesummary.developmentreport. This sub-category will beused to provide greater content onthe types of policy coherence forsustainable development issuesraised in reports. Also provideinformation for countries that donot focus on policy coherence butmention participation in South-SouthCooperation or efforts to addressglobal issues related to the SDGs.Not articulated in the VNR report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a14Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 tion andLinkages to climateWhether the report links SDGClimate change and the Paris Agreementpolicy coherencechange and the Parisimplementation to climate changeexplicitly linked to the SDGsAgreementand delivering on the ParisAgreement.Climate change referenced but nomention of the Paris AgreementNo mention of climate change or the ParisAgreementIntegration andTackling climateHow the reports links climate changeProvide direct text from the VNR reportpolicy coherencechangeand the Paris Agreement to theor if longer than 200 words, provide aSDGs.summary.Not articulated in the VNR reportIntegration andLinkages to the AddisWhether the report links SDGpolicy coherenceAbaba Action Agendaimplementation to the Addis AbabaYesAction agenda.NoAdditional data required to LNOBLeave no oneData to leave no oneAvailability of data and baselines tobehindbehindensure no one is left behind.Efforts to LNOB informed by existingbaselines/available dataNot articulated in the VNR reportLeave no oneTargets of efforts toGroups within society as mentionedProvide list of groups mentioned by thebehindLNOBby the VNR report that will beVNR report (e.g. indigenous peoples,targeted in efforts to LNOB.women; people with disabilities, etc.)Not articulated in the VNR reportLeave no oneEfforts to leave nobehindone behindEfforts as outlined in the VNR.Provide direct text from the VNR reportor if longer than 200 words, provide asummaryNot articulated in the VNR reportLeave no oneReducing domesticEfforts specifically geared towardsProvide direct text from the VNR reportbehindinequalitiesreducing domestic inequalities asor if longer than 200 words, provide aoutlined in the VNR report.summaryNot articulated in the VNR report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a15Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 HLPFCATEGORYSUB-COMPONENTDESCRIPTIONOPTIONSRaising awarenessAwareness-raisingWhether the government took efforts,Yesand creatingefforts carried out byincluding working in partnership withownership of thegovernmentothers, to raise awareness about the2030 AgendaSDGs at country level.Raising awarenessNationalisation ofDoes the VNR report indicate thatand creatingthe SDG agenda atthe country has identified nationalownership of thecountrypriorities within the context of the2030 AgendaNoNot articulated in the VNR reportNational priorities selectedNo national priorities selectedSDGs?Raising awarenessPreparation ofHas the country defined its ownand creatingnational targets andnational targets and indicators?ownership of theindicatorsYesNo2030 AgendaNational targets onlyNational indicators onlyUnclear from the VNR reportRaising awarenessNational prioritiesList the national priorities identifiedProvide direct text from the VNR reportand creatingunder the SDGsunder the SDGs.if longer than 200 words, provide aownership of thesummary.2030 AgendaNot articulated in the VNR reportRaising awarenessLocalisation of theExtent to which the VNR reportProvide direct text from the VNR reportand creatingSDG agenda atoutlines how the SDGs are beingor if longer than 200 words, provide aownership of thecountry levelimplemented at the local level.summary.2030 AgendaNot articulated in the VNR reportStakeholderConsultation withArticulation of how non-state actorsNon-state actors engaged in identificationengagementnational stakeholderswere involved in the defining ofof national prioritieson SDG prioritiesnational priorities under the SDGs.Non-state actors were not engaged in theidentification of national prioritiesThe VNR report does not set out nationalprioritiesNot articulated in the VNR report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a16Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 lderNon-state actorWhether non-state actors wereYesengagementengagement in theengaged in the development of thedevelopment of VNRVNR report.reportsNoUnclear from the VNR reportStakeholderBest practice inExamples of best practiceProvide direct text from the VNR reportengagementnon-state actorin consultations on nationalor if longer than 200 words, provide aengagementreport, and/or engagementsummary.in implementation and thedevelopment of VNR reports.StakeholderCivil society reportengagementDoes a civil society shadow (reportNoprepared for the HLPF in responseto government report) or spotlight(report prepared on the country’sprogress on the SDGs not necessarilylinked to government report and/orthe HLPF) report exist?Spotlight and shadow reportShadow reportSpotlight reportImplementing theBest practices asThe Secretary General guidelines forProvide direct text from the VNR report2030 Agendaidentified by thethe VNR report invite countries toor if longer than 200 words, provide acountryoutline 2-3 best practices.summary.Not articulated in VNR reportImplementing theLessons learnedThe Secretary General guidelinesProvide direct text from the VNR report2030 Agendain acceleratingfor the VNR report invite countriesor if longer than 200 words, provide aimplementationto outline 2-3 lessons learned insummary.accelerating implementation of theSDGs.Not articulated in the VNR reportImplementing theChallenges inThe Secretary General guidelines forProvide direct text from the VNR report2030 Agendaimplementing Agendathe VNR report invite countries toor if longer than 200 words, provide a2030outline 2-3 challenges they face insummary.implementing the SDGs.Not articulated in the VNR report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a17Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 nting theReference toWhether the report referencesCountry level implementation has been2030 Agendafinancing Agendafinancing needs to realise the 2030costed and the country has identified2030 at country levelAgenda at country level and howsources of financeefforts will be funded. Include innotes section description of effortsCountry level implementation has been(domestic resource mobilisation, etc.)costed but sources of finance are notidentifiedCosting for country level implementationnot mentioned but sources of financeidentifiedCosting for country level implementationis planned and no sources of finance havebeen identifiedCosting for country level implementationis planned and sources of finance havebeen identifiedNot articulated in the VNR reportImplementing theMeans ofWhether the report refers toProvide direct text from the VNR report2030 Agendaimplementation -technology in the discussion of theor if longer than 200 words, provide atechnologymeans of implementation and/orsummary.goal analysis. Include description ofthe country’s own efforts and gapsNot articulated in the VNR reportas well as support by developmentpartners (or support given ifexamining a high-income country).Implementing theMeans ofWhether the report refers to capacityProvide direct text from the VNR report2030 Agendaimplementation -development in the discussion ofor if longer than 200 words, provide acapacity developmentthe means of implementation and/orsummary.goal analysis. Include description ofthe country’s own efforts and gapsas well as support by developmentpartners (or support given ifexamining a high-income country).Not articulated in the VNR report
ANNEX 1ANNEX 2ANNEX 3a18Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 2. MethodologyTABLE A2 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING VNR REPORTING TO THE 2017 nting theMeans ofWhether the report refers toProvide direct text from the VNR report2030 Agendaimplementation -international public finance (officialor if longer than 200 words, provide ainternational publicdevelopment assistance, South-summary.financeSouth and Triangular cooperation)in the discussion of the means ofNot articulated in the VNR reportimplementation and/or goal analysis.Include description of the country’sown efforts as well as support bydevelopment partners (or supportgiven if examining a high-incomecountry).Implementing theMeans ofWhether the report refers to tradeProvide direct text from the VNR report2030 Agendaimplementation -in the discussion of the means ofor if longer than 200 words, provide atradeimplementation and/or goal analysis.summary.Include description of the country’sown efforts as well as support byNot articulated in the VNR reportdevelopment partners (or supportgiven if examining a high-incomecountry).Implementing theMeans ofWhether the report refers to systemicProvide direct text from the VNR report2030 Agendaimplementation -issues. Policy coherence and dataor if longer than 200 words, provide asystemic issuesissues are captured by differentsummary.sub-categories. Include issues relatedto global macro-economic stabilityNot articulated in the VNR report(e.g. impact of global crises oncountry), respect for policy space,and other
An independent assessment of the voluntary national review reports submitted to . Progressing national SDGs implementation: Annex 1. VNR reports reviewed ANNEX 1 ANNEX 2 ANNEX 3 a1 Annex 1. VNR reports reviewed All VNR reports are available through the United Nations Sustainable . Zimbabwe Africa Eastern Africa Low-income country (Footnotes)
State of Florida Annex for a Pandemic or Widespread Disease Occurrence with the State of Florida Biological Incident Annex Incident-Specific Annexes 02/12 Updated annexes for Wildfire, Terrorism, Radiological Emergency Preparedness and Repatriation Incident-Specific Annexes 02/12 Replaced severe weather and tropical weather annexes with the
80AVRIL 2010 VOILE MAGAZINE matos COMPARATIF ANNEXES va aux sacs développables, notamment ceux de Zodiac et Bombard. Plus la peine de sauter sur place pour faire descendre
As a result of these objections, the Annexes Z to EN ISO 14971 were modified, resulting in EN ISO 14971:2012. This amendment of the EN ISO 14971 standard did not modify the normative parts of ISO 14971:20071. The Annexes Z describe the extent of presumption of conformity that can be based on application of the normative requirements of ISO .
Le fabricant et l’utilisateur d’un additif alimentaire sont tenus: a. de transmettre à l’OSAV toute nouvelle information scientifique ou techni-que susceptible d’influer sur l’évaluation de la sécurité de cet additif; et b. d’informer l’OSAV, sur demande, des usages de l’additif concerné. Art. 11 Modification des annexes L’OSAV adapte régulièrement les annexes de la .
out Rules 1 through 38— the main body of the Rules. The five Annexes were published as regulations. It is important to note that with the exception of Annex V to the Inland Rules, the International and Inland Rules and Annexes are very similar in both content and format. The effective date for the Inland Navigation Rules was December 24, 1981,
Level Subject Page GR REF 6 SCHOOL DESIGN GUIDELINES ANNEXES, TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS LIST OF ANNEXES V1-01 School construction planning process V1-02 School facilities planning and programming V1-03 Standard school sizes V1-04 Site minimum surface areas V1-05-06 Elementary school standards - accommodation schedules V1-07-10 Basic education standard schools - Accommodations
Study to assess two (2) exemption requests in Annexes III and IV to Directive 2011/65/EU: renewal of exemption IV.42, and request for a new exemption for lead and hexavalent chromium compounds in electric and electronic initiators of explosives for civil (professional) use (Pack 16) –Final Report . Under the Framework Contract: Assistance to the Commission on technical, socio-economic and .
Attila has been an Authorized AutoCAD Architecture Instructor since 2008 and teaching AutoCAD Architecture software to future architects at the Department of Architectural Representation of Budapest University of Technology and Economics in Hungary. He also took part in creating various tutorial materials for architecture students. Currently he .
