Grammar To Get Things Done - City Tech OpenLab

2y ago
106 Views
35 Downloads
432.09 KB
27 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Carlos Cepeda
Transcription

Grammar to Get Things DoneGrammar to Get Things Done offers a fresh lens on grammar and grammarinstruction, designed for middle and secondary pre-service and in-service Englishteachers. It shows how form, function, and use can help teachers move away fromdecontextualized gram -mar instruction (such as worksheets and exercisesemphasizing rule-following and memorizing conventional definitions) and beginconsidering grammar in applied contexts of everyday use.Modules (organized by units) succinctly explain common grammatical concepts.These modules help English teachers gain confidence in their own understandingwhile positioning grammar instruction as an opportunity to discuss, analyze, andproduce language for real purposes in the world. An important feature of the text isattention to both the history of and current attitudes about grammar through asociocultural lens, with ideas for teachers to bring discussions of language-as-powerinto their own classrooms.Darren Crovitz is Professor of English and English Education and the Director ofEnglish Education at Kennesaw State University, USA.Michelle D. Devereaux is Assistant Professor of English and English Education atKennesaw State University, USA.

Grammar to Get Things DoneA Practical Guide for Teachers Anchored in Real-WorldUsageDarren CrovitzMichelle D. DevereauxA CO-PUBLICATION OF ROUTLEDGE AND THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OFTEACHERS OF ENGLISH

Brief ContentsPrefaceAcknowledgmentsCHAPTER 1 IntroductionCHAPTER 2 Grammar and PowerCHAPTER 3 Teaching Grammar IntentionallyCHAPTER 4 Grammatical ConceptsUnit 1: Sentences and Sentence TypesUnit 2: ClausesUnit 3: PhrasesUnit 4: Lexical CategoriesUnit 5: PunctuationAppendixIndex

ContentsCoverTitleCopyrightDedicationBRIEF CONTENTSCONTENTSPrefaceAcknowledgmentsCHAPTER 1 IntroductionDefining GrammarGrammarUsageMechanicA Very sShort History of Grammar and Usage in the EnglishLanguageA Very Short History of Modern Grammar InstructionApproaches to Grammar: Prescriptive, Descriptive, and RhetoricalPrescriptive and Descriptive GrammarsRhetorical GrammarHow We Address Grammar(s) in This BookWhy Definitions?Form, Function, and UseParts of Speech or Lexical Categories?The Goal for All: Metalinguistic AwarenessReferencesCHAPTER 2 Grammar and PowerWhat is Standard English?Moralizing LanguageGrammar(s) and Power, Society, and Identity

PowerSocietyIdentityCritical Awareness and Grammar InstructionFurther ReadingReferencesCHAPTER 3 Teaching Grammar IntentionallyGrammar as an Integrated Element of Broader DesignAuthority, Control, and Punishment (Sample Integrated Unit #1)Specific Grammar Concepts for This UnitWhat Counts as Intelligence? (Sample Integrated Unit #2)Specific Grammar Concepts for This UnitHow to Plan for Specific Grammar IntegrationCorrection and Grammar Instruction: Using Student WorkDiagnosticallyGeneral Issues and What They MeanPassage- and Paragraph-Level Patterns and What TheyMeanSentence-Level Patterns and What They MeanConclusionReferencesCHAPTER 4 Grammatical ConceptsIntroduction: What It Is, and What It Ain’tStructure of Chapter 4Limitations of Chapter 4Unit 1: Sentences and Sentence TypesConcept: The SentenceOverviewForm and FunctionFocusing on Use: How Sentences are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with the SentenceConcept: Non-Sentences and Their UsesOverviewForm

Fragments and FunctionFocusing on Use: How Non-Sentences are Usefulin Actual CommunicationExperimenting with Fragments and Run-OnsConcept: Simple SentencesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Simple Sentences areUseful in Actual CommunicationExperimenting with Simple SentencesConcept: Compound Sentences and ConjunctionsOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Compound Sentences areUseful in Actual CommunicationExperimenting with Compound SentencesConcept: Complex SentencesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Complex Sentences areUseful in Actual CommunicationExperimenting with Complex SentencesConcept: Compound-Complex SentencesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Compound-ComplexSentences are Useful in Actual encesConcept: Active and PassiveVoice Overview

FormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Active Voice is Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with Passive VoiceUNIT 2: ClausesConcept: Dependent ClausesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Dependent Clauses areUseful in Actual CommunicationExperimenting with Dependent ClausesUNIT 3: PhrasesConcept: Appositive PhrasesOverviewForm and FunctionFocusing on Use: How Appositive Phrases areUseful in Actual CommunicationExperimenting with Appositive PhrasesConcept: Participial PhrasesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Participles are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with Participial PhrasesConcept: Absolute PhrasesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Absolute Phrases are Usefulin Actual CommunicationExperimenting with Absolute PhrasesConcept: Gerunds

OverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Gerunds are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with GerundsConcept: InfinitivesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Infinitives are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with InfinitivesConcept: PrepositionsOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Prepositions are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with PrepositionsUNIT 4: Lexical CategoriesConcept: NounsOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Nouns are Useful in ActualCommunicationExperimenting with NounsConcept: Action VerbsOverviewForm and FunctionFocusing on Use: How Action Verbs are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with Action VerbsConcept: Other Verbs

OverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Verbs are Useful in ActualCommunicationExperimenting with Other VerbsConcept: AdjectivesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Adjectives are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with AdjectivesConcept: AdverbsOverviewForm and FunctionFocusing on Use: How Adverbs are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with AdverbsConcept: PronounsOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Pronouns are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with PronounsUNIT 5: PunctuationConcept: ColonsOverviewForm and FunctionFocusing on Use: How Colons are Useful in ActualCommunicationExperimenting with ColonsConcept: SemicolonsOverview

Form and FunctionFocusing on Use: How Semicolons are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with SemicolonsConcept: DashesOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Dashes are Useful in ActualCommunicationExperimenting with DashesConcept: HyphensOverviewFormFunctionFocusing on Use: How Hyphens are Useful inActual CommunicationExperimenting with HyphensConcept: CommasOverviewForm and FunctionReferencesAppendixWhat’s in this Appendix?Innate UnderstandingsSuffixesGrammar RantsLanguage and PowerLanguage and Society/Language and IdentityGrammar(s) of Their WorldsOpen and Closed Word ClassesAnalyzing Grammar in ChunksPunctuationMore Thematic UnitsReferences

PrefaceIn Grammar to Get Things Done, we bring a fresh approach to grammar andgrammar instruction for middle and secondary English teachers. We use form,function, and use to help teachers consider grammar in the applied contexts ofeveryday language use. Focusing on 25 of the most common grammatical concepts,this book helps English teachers gain confidence in their own understanding whilepositioning grammar instruction as an opportunity to discuss, analyze, and producelanguage for real purposes. In addition, we explore both the history of and currentattitudes toward grammar through a sociocultural lens, with ideas for teachers tobring discussions of language-as-power into their own classrooms.Grammar to Get Things Done is organized into four chapters. Chapter 1 beginswith an introduction to conventional definitions of grammar, mechanics, and usage,followed by an overview of the history of English language grammar instruction anda look at understanding grammar from prescriptive, descriptive, and rhetoricalperspec tives. Chapter 2 focuses on the interrelationship of language, power, culture,society, and identity, examining conventional attitudes about “correct” language use,raising questions about the implications of Standard English assumptions, anddiscussing concepts of formal and informal English, English dialects, and the troublingconsequences of moralizing language use. Chapter 3 addresses how to incorporategrammar concepts into a wider curriculum. Chapter 4 features 25 sections, eachdevoted to a particular grammar concept: what the concept is (i.e., its form), how theconcept works in our language (i.e., its function), and how we use it in the world (i.e.,its use). These sections are anchored by a number of applied scenarios—practicalstudent-focused experiments dealing with how each grammatical concept works to getthings done.

What’s Special about this Book?An Emphasis on Real-World Use: Rather than defining a grammar rule and thenoffering exercises to reinforce that rule (the format of many grammar books), wefocus on a concept’s form, function, and use. We follow this explanation withscenarios that place each concept in “real world” situations designed to revealgrammar’s immediate utility: in influencing others, shaping events, achieving aspecific purpose, and otherwise getting things done with words. Grammar is oftenviewed as a dry and boring subject by teachers and students alike, even though we allmanipulate grammatical constructions hundreds of times a day to make our way inthe world.Power, Society, and Identity: Few texts discuss the implications of teachingStandard English grammar in the secondary English classroom when many highschool students do not speak Standard English at home or in their community. Thisbook explicitly discusses how teachers can integrate the sociolinguistic implications ofpower, society, and identity in tandem with grammar instruction. Additionally, weoffer specific ideas on how to begin and sustain these conversations with secondaryEnglish students.Grammar Within Thematic Units: Grammar can and should fit within widerthematic units. We provide specific guidance for considering how the meaning anduse of specific concepts can fit within a larger theme-driven curriculum.Note: Words in bold type refer to sections in Chapter 4; pages for relevant sectionscan be found in the Table of Contents.

AcknowledgmentsThis book would not have happened without a lot of help from other people.Thank you to our Kennesaw State University colleagues, past and present, whohelped get this project started: Jennifer Dail, Michelle Goodsite, Aaron Levy, RobMontgomery, Chris Palmer, David Johnson, Bill Rice, Dawn Kirby, and Ryan Rish.Thanks also to the KSU Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, whichsupported our initial programmatic forays into improving grammar instruction with aFaculty Learning Community grant.Our school partners have provided important assistance with this project: JeffCrawford, Carolyn Waters, Lisa Jackson, Vijay Koilpillai, Mary Ann Stillerman, andLori Calandra. Special thanks to Sherrye Tillman at Osborne High School and SherylDavis at Walton High School.This project is, in the end, about helping students. Thank you to the students inSherrye’s and Sheryl’s classes who experimented with these approaches and providedfeedback. Thanks also to the many preservice English teachers who worked throughearlier versions of these scenarios in our methods courses. In particular, we would liketo thank Delisa Mulkey, Ashley Baldwin Kelsey, and Asher Kelsey for their efforts.Naomi Silverman, our editor at Routledge, has been constantly enthusiastic andhelpful through this process. Thank you. Tobey Antao at Heinemann read andresponded to early work; thanks, Tobey, for your patience and professionalism.And, of course, thank you to our families for their support and understandingthroughout this project.

Chapter 1IntroductionWhen Michelle taught her first high school class, she fit the stereotype of the uptightEnglish teacher obsessed with correct grammar use. Though her teacher pens werefull of purple and green ink instead of red, the result was the same: her students’papers marked with every error she could find. That, she thought, was good grammarinstruction. After all, that was how her own teachers had taught grammar so manyyears earlier: identify the mistakes in student writing relentlessly and follow that withworksheets, lots of worksheets, to hammer home correct usage.Experience is a persuasive guide. For years, Michelle continued to mark up herstudents’ papers. She passed out stacks of grammar worksheets in the hope that herstudents would finally put that comma after the introductory adverbial clause.Strangely, while her students dutifully completed these stand-alone exercises, theirown writing never seemed to show much improvement. They continued to make thesame grammatical mistakes they’d always made. On some level, Michelle was awareof a disconnect here. Why couldn’t her students transfer the lessons of a worksheet totheir own spontaneous writing? She heard other teachers complain about students aslazy or careless. Was that it, or was she missing something important? Assigning thosephotocopied grammar worksheets felt like teaching and fit comfortably with theconventional expectations of an English classroom. But it was hard for her to ignorethe obvious. Her students didn’t seem to be actually learning anything.Eventually, Michelle heard about teachers exploring different ways to teachgrammar and help their students write better sentences, passages, and papers. Whiletrying out new approaches seemed sensible, she was reluctant. After all, what if herstudents asked a question that she couldn’t answer? There was so much aboutgrammar that she didn’t know. And so, fear and tradition kept the bleeding papersand the worksheets front and center for many years, until Michelle really startedlearning what grammar is and how it really works.

Defining GrammarAs a rookie teacher sharing resources with her colleagues, Michelle found that manyveteran teachers’ writing rubrics had the acronym “GUM” at the bottom, forGrammar, Usage, and Mechanics. She was confused by this acronym. Wasn’tgrammar just the rules and expectations for comma placement, sentence structure,verb choice, those lovely parts of speech, and the like? There were entire books—shehad to buy them in college—that told her the rules of grammar. Why did theseteachers differentiate between grammar, usage, and mechanics, and for that matter,what did these words even mean?Grammar“Grammar” has a far simpler definition than Michelle’s college grammar books ledher to believe. At its most basic, grammar is “a description of language structure”(Kolln & Gray, 2013, p. 1), a map of the innate understandings of language forms thatall native speakers possess. You will never hear a first-language English speaker say“Red the on had shirt a student” because such an utterance is not grammatical,meaning that it doesn’t fit the underlying map in our minds for how English is used.What speakers will say (“The student had on a red shirt,” “The student had a red shirton”) may vary for different reasons, but it will always be understandable. Alldevelopmentally normal first-language speakers have grammatical structures hardwired into their brains; researchers have found that even before children are born,they are differentiating the particular rhythms of their mother’s language (Kolln &Gray, 2013). By eighteen months of age, children have already identified predictablepatterns (that is, they’re picking up the grammar) of their first language and havebegun to use them regularly. In English, these patterns include subject-verb (“Kittyrun”), verb-object (“Find Mommy”), and noun-modifier (“Hotdog allgone”) (Curzan &Adams, 2012, p. 322).We discuss various American English dialects later in Chapter 2, but it’s worthmentioning a point here on which all linguists agree: all dialects are grammatical(Adger, Wolfram, & Christian, 2007; Charity Hudley & Mallison, 2011; Green, 2007;Labov, 1972; Redd & Webb, 2005; Simpkins & Simpkins, 1981; Wheeler & Swords,

2006). That is, all dialects follow rules that every first-language speaker canunderstand.1 “Him and me went to the store” will be received in different waysaccording to the expectations of the listener, but the meaning of the sentence willrarely be in doubt. It’s as understandable as “He and I went to the store,” and thatmakes it grammatical.Crazy as it may sound, grammar is really about understanding, not about“correctness.”UsageIn our experience, usage is what most people mean when they use the overarchingterm grammar. “Usage” can be understood as the arbitrary rules of language thathave been deemed correct by mainstream groups. We think Sledd (1996) provides ahelpful explanation:The study of usage is the study of approved choices among socially graded synonyms. I ain’t got none means “I don’thave any” or “I have none.” All three sentences are equally clear; all are governed by stable rules of grammar; butain’t and multiple negatives are in some quarters socially disapproved. When we teach correct usage, we teachlinguistic manners of the privileged. Correct usage is usage that observes those constantly changing manners.(p. 59, italics in original)What is considered “correct” changes across time and place. Many English teacherswill pounce quickly when students use double negatives (“I don’t got no cooties”), butthere was a time when such usage was acceptable, as the examples below illustrate:Ther nas no man nowher so virtuous (Chaucer, “The Friar’s Tale”)I never was nor never will be. (Shakespeare, Richard III)Not until the printing of Robert Lowth’s infamous (and we use “infamous”purposefully here) 1762 book A Short Introduction to English Grammar did thedouble negative attain its current frowned-upon status. Sayeth Lowth, “TwoNegatives in English destroy one another, or are equivalent to an Affirmative” (ascited in Schuster, 2003, p. 60), managing in one sentence to condemn a popular usagewhile also spawning a now-common grammar meme (When you say “I don’t got nocooties” it actually means you do have cooties!!). Languages evolve, and when theydo, what counts as correct changes as well.Lowth’s argument against the double negative—that two negatives make a positive

—is a long-standing fallacy, one we often hear when talking with teachers aboutgrammar and American English dialects. Turns out that many modern languages(such as Spanish, Portuguese, and French) employ double negatives, and we’re prettysure that when French speakers say, “Je ne sais pas” [literally, “I don’t know nothing”]they don’t actually mean “I know.” Triple negatives reinforce the silliness of thesebogus language prescriptions. When a Southern English speaker says, “Jimmy don’tknow nothing noways,” does that speaker really mean that Jimmy does knowsomething but not at all? Of course not. The intended meaning of the statement isclear to any native listener, and superimposing the rules of one discipline (math) ontoanother (language) produces absurdity rather than clarity. With matters ofcommunication, the rules of logic often don’t apply.Our point here is that usage rules are arbitrary, dictated and elaborated in thecollege textbooks Michelle bought and in innumerable style guides on bookstoreshelves. People are quick to ascribe a moral dimension to language use: your use of“incorrect” or “bad” grammar must indicate something deficient in your upbringing,your culture, your soul. But these judgments and the rules they arise from rest uponshaky ground. Today’s acceptable usage is tomorrow’s faux pas.That said, we are not arguing against the use of a standardized language. Far fromit. We think a standardized language is vital, as it provides everyone a means forcommon communication. Bottom line, grammar and usage are two different aspectsof language st

In Grammar to Get Things Done, we bring a fresh approach to grammar and grammar instruction for middle and secondary English teachers. We use form, function, and use to help teachers consider grammar in the applied contexts of everyday language use

Related Documents:

Grammar Express 79 Center Stage 79 Longman Advanced Learners’ Grammar 80 An Introduction to English Grammar 80 Longman Student Grammar of Spoken & Written English 80 Longman Grammar of Spoken & Written English 80 Grammar Correlation Chart KEY BOOK 1 BOOK 2 BOOK 3 BOOK 4 BOOK 5 BOOK 6 8. Grammar.indd 76 27/8/10 09:44:10

IV Grammar/Comp Text ABeka Grammar 10th Grade 5.00 IV Grammar/Comp Text ABeka Grammar 10th Grade 5.00 Grammar/Composition IV ABeka Grammar 10th Grade 3.00 Workbook - Keys ABeka Grammar 12th Grade 10.00 Workbook VI-set ABeka Grammar 12th Grade 20.00 Daily Grams Gra

1.1 Text and grammar 3 1.2 Phonology and grammar 11 1.3 Basic concepts for the study of language 19 1.4 The location of grammar in language; the role of the corpus 31 2 Towards a functional grammar 37 2.1 Towards a grammatical analysis 37 2.2 The lexico-grammar cline 43 2.3 Grammaticalization 46 2.4 Grammar and the corpus 48 2.5 Classes and .

TURKISH GRAMMAR UPDATED ACADEMIC EDITION 2013 3 TURKISH GRAMMAR I FOREWORD The Turkish Grammar book that you have just started reading is quite different from the grammar books that you read in schools. This kind of Grammar is known as tradit ional grammar. The main differenc

Grammar is a part of learning a language. Grammar can be resulted by the process of teaching and learning. Students cannot learn grammar without giving grammar teaching before. Thornbury (1999) clarifies that grammar is a study of language to form sentences. In this respect, grammar has an important role in sentence construction both i.

Work given below to done in Worksheets. 10 Work given below to be done in Mental Maths Book. 11. 12. . The following work should be done in Grammar Land book, Ch. 2, pg. 11&12 16. The following work should be done in Grammar Land book, Ch.3, pg. 15 17. The following work should be done in Grammar Land book Ch. 3, pg. 16 & 17 18.

hybrid logic dependency structures What do the grammar and lexicon look like? Categorial Grammar Categorial grammars are lexicalised grammars a grammar is just a “dictionary” there are no language-specific grammar rules a grammar is a mapping from words to stru

STM32 MCUs listed in Table 1. Outsourcing of product manufacturing enables original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to reduce their direct costs and concentrate on high added-value activities such as research and development, sales and marketing. However, contract manufacturing puts the OEM's proprietary assets at risk, and since the contract manufacturer (CM) manipulates the OEM's intellectual .