Earned Value Management System Description

2y ago
22 Views
2 Downloads
705.43 KB
65 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jayda Dunning
Transcription

LCLS Project ManagementDocument #1.1-015ProjectManagementRevision 3.0Earned Value Management System DescriptionPatricia Mast(LCLS Project ControlsManager)SignatureDateMark Reichanadter(LCLS Deputy Project Director)SignatureDateJohn Galayda(LCLS Project Director)SignatureDateChange History 3.8, App. BAllDescription of ChangeInitial version released.Complete rewrite and reformatMR, Contingency definition updateChanged text to make the SystemDescription for all SLAC projects, notjust LCLS.

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLACEarned Value ManagementSystem Description

Table of ContentsTable of ContentsINTRODUCTION . VPROJECT ORGANIZATION AND PRELIMINARY PLANNING.11.11.1.11.1.21.1.31.1.41.1.51.1.6PROJECT STRUCTURE .1Objective [Guide 1, 2, 3 {2.1a, b, c}] .1Project Execution Plan [Guide 3 {2.1c}] .1Work Breakdown Structure [Guide 1 {2.1a}].1Work Breakdown Structure Dictionary [Guide 1 {2.1a}] .2Organizational Breakdown Structure [Guide 2 {2.1b}] .2Responsibility Assignment Matrix [Guide 3, 5 {2.1c, e}] .21.2PROJECT SCHEDULE.21.2.1 Objective [Guide 6, 7 {2.2a, b}] .21.2.2 Schedule Development [Guide 6, 7 {2.2a, b}] ING AND BUDGETING .4Objective [Guide 8, 9, 15 {2.2c, d, j}] .4Performance Measurement Baseline [Guide 8, 9, 15{2.2c, d, j}] .4Control Accounts [Guide 3, 5, 18 {2.1c, e, 2.3c}] .5Control Account Planning [Guide: 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 30 {2.1c, e, 2.2c, d, e, f, 2.5c}] .5Work Packages [Guide 3, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 {2.1c, 2.2b, d, e, f, g}] .6Planning Packages [Guide 3, 7, 9, 10, 11 {2.1c, 2.2b, d, e, f}] .7Acquisition Planning [Guide 2, 9, 10, {2.1b, 2.2d, e}].7Management Reserve/Contingency and Undistributed Budget [Guide14 {2.2i}] .71.41.4.11.4.21.4.3WORK AUTHORIZATION.8Objective [Guide 3 {2.1c}] .8Contractual Authorization [Guide 3 {2.1c}] .8Work Authorization Document [Guide 3 {2.1c}].8EARNED VALUE ANALYSIS AND PROGRESS REPORTING .112.1EARNED VALUE.112.1.1 Requirements for Employing Earned Value Methodology [Guide 7, 12 {2.2b, g}].112.1.2 EV Measurement Techniques [Guide 7, 12 {2.2b, g}].112.1.2.12.1.2.2Discrete Effort. 12Level of Effort (LOE) . 122.22.2.12.2.22.2.32.2.4STATUS AND EARNED VALUE CALCULATION.12Objective.12Performance Measurement Data [Guide 22, 23 {2.4a, b}] .12Evaluation of Planned Value [Guide 7, 12, 22, 23 {2.2b,g, 2.4a,b}] .14Current Schedule Progress Evaluation [Guide 22, 23 {2.4a, MANCE ANALYSIS .15Objective.15Variance Analysis [Guide 22, 23, 25 {2.4a, b, d}] .16Variance Thresholds [Guide 22, 23, 25 {2.4a, b, d}] .16Performance Indices [Guide 22, 23, 25 {2.4a, b, d}] .16Control Account Performance Analysis [Guide 22, 23, 25, 26, 27 {2.4a, b, d, e, f}] .17Project Performance Analysis [Guide 22, 23, 25, 26, 27 {2.4a, b, d, e, f}].17Monthly Project Status Calculations and Forecasts [Guide 22, 23, 25, 27 {2.4a, b, d, f}].182.4REPORTING.182.4.1 Objective.18i

LCLS Earned Value Management System Description2.4.2 General Reporting [Guide 25, 26 {2.4d, e}] .182.4.3 Monthly Reporting Cycle [Guide 22, 23, 25 {2.4a, b, d}] .19ACCOUNTING .213.1ACCOUNTING PROCESSES .213.1.1 Objective.213.1.2 Cost Accounting Policy [Guide 16 {2.3a}].213.1.3 Cost Code Structure [Guide 16, 17, 18, 19 {2.3a, b, c, d}] .213.1.4 Cost Accumulation [Guide 16 {2.3a}].223.1.5 Direct Labor Cost [Guide 16 {2.3a}] .223.1.6 Material Cost and Accounting [Guide 16, 21 {2.3a, f}].223.1.7 Subcontract Cost [Guide 16 {2.3a}].223.1.8 Other Direct Cost (ODC) [Guide 16 {2.3a}] .233.1.9 Indirect Cost Accumulation [Guide 13, 19 {2.2h, 2.3d}] .233.1.10 Accounting Adjustments [Guide 19, 30 {2.3d, 2.5c}] .233.23.2.13.2.23.2.33.2.4INDIRECT COST PLANNING AND CONTROL.23Objective.23Indirect Cost Pools [Guide 4, 13, 19, 24 {2.1d, 2.2h, 2.3d, 2.4c}].23Allocation of Indirect Costs to Projects [Guide 4, 13, 19, 24 {2.1d, 2.2h, 2.3d, 2.4c}] .23Revisions to Indirect Rates [Guide 4, 13, 19, 24 {2.1d, 2.2h, 2.3d, 2.4c}] .233.3MATERIAL ACCOUNTING [GUIDE 20, 21 {2.3 E, F}] .24SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT .254.1SUBCONTRACTS WITH EV FLOW-DOWN [GUIDE 9, 10,16,22,23 {2.2D, E, 2.3A, 2.4A, B}].254.2SUBCONTRACTS WITHOUT EV FLOW-DOWN [GUIDE 9, 10,16,22,23 {2.2D, E, 2.3A, 2.4A, B}]25CHANGE CONTROL .275.15.1.15.1.25.1.35.1.45.1.5CHANGE-CONTROL PROCESS .27Objective [Guide 28, 29, 31, 32 {2.5a, b, d, e}] .27Change Documentation [Guide 28, 29, 31, 32 {2.5a, b, d, e}].27Change Request [Guide 28, 29, 31, 32 {2.5a, b, d, e}].27External and Directed Changes [Guide 28, 29, 31, 32 {2.5a, b, d, e}] .28Internal Changes [Guide 28, 29, 31, {2.5a, b, 1.5.75.1.5.85.2Internal Replanning Restrictions [Guide 28, 29, 30, 31 {2.5a, b, c, d}]. 28Changes within Control Accounts [Guide 28, 29 {2.5a, b}] . 29Other Internal Replanning [Guide 28, 29, 31 {2.5a, b, d}] . 29Changes to Actual Direct and Indirect Costs [Guide 29, 30 {2.5b, c}] . 30Changes to Budgeted Direct and Indirect Rates [Guide 29 {2.5b}] . 30Changes in Scope or Nature of Work [Guide 28, 29, 31 {2.5a, b, d}] . 30Changes in Make-or-Buy Determination [Guide 28, 29, 31 {2.5a, b, d}]. 30Changes in Funding Profiles [Guide 28, 29, 31 {2.5a, b, d}]. 31SCHEDULING CHANGES [GUIDE 28, 29, 31 {2.5A, B, D}] .31SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE .336.16.1.16.1.26.1.3SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE PROCESSES .33Objectives .33System Surveillance .33System Maintenance .336.2SELF ASSESSMENT FOR SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE.34APPENDIX A ANSI/EIA-748-A GUIDELINE CROSSWALK.35APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS .41ii

Table of ContentsAPPENDIX C ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .51APPDENDIX D REFERENCES .55FIGURESFigure 1-1. DOE Acquisition Management System .5Figure 2-1. Earned Value Data Elements .17iii

LCLS Earned Value Management System Descriptioniv

IntroductionIntroductionThe Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) uses an Earned Value Management System (EVMS)to integrate project management elements required to effectively organize, plan, and control complexprojects. This Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Description document provides acomprehensive exposition of processes and guidance for cost, schedule, and technical performancemanagement and reporting as well as for effective project execution using earned value management.SLAC project activities are primarily conducted to support the mission needs and national securityrequirements of the U.S. DOE, Office of Science (SC). In support of DOE projects, SLAC follows therequirements in DOE Order 413.3, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of CapitalAssets, and generally follows the accompanying guidance in manual (DOE M 413.3), whichdelineates earned value requirements. The SLAC EVMS also fulfills the requirements of the Office ofManagement and Budget Circular No. A–11, Part 7, Section 300, Planning, Budgeting, Acquisition,and Management of Capital Assets which also delineates earned value requirements. The SLACEVMS process and organization are designed to comply with the American National StandardsInstitute (ANSI) and Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA) Standard for Earned Value ManagementSystems (ANSI/EIA-748-A, January, 2006). The ANSI/EIA-748-A standard is an industry bestpractice as well as the official DOE and federal government standard for EVMS. Appendix Aprovides a crosswalk between the 32 ANSI/EIA-748-A guidelines and the SLAC EVMS.The SLAC EVMS is a key component of the organization, methods, and procedures adopted by theSLAC projects to ensure that their missions and functions are properly executed. It addresses theseven principles of EVMS as defined by the ANSI standard: Plan all work scope for the project to completion.Break down the project work scope into finite pieces that can be assigned to a responsibleperson or organization for control of the technical, schedule, and cost objectives.Integrate the project work scope, schedule, and cost objectives into a performancemeasurement baseline against which accomplishments may be measured. Control changesto the baseline.Use actual costs incurred and recorded in accomplishing the work performed.Objectively assess accomplishments at the work performance level.Analyze significant variances from the plans, forecast impacts, and prepare an estimate atcompletion based on performance to date and work to be performed.Use EVMS information in management processes.These principles are integrated into a comprehensive system that develops and maintains the baseline;tracks project cost, schedule, and scope; and provides for the generation of timely performancemeasurement data and reports. Performance measurement reports provide management with objectivev

LCLS Earned Value Management System Descriptionproject information critical to monitoring progress, identifying significant issues, and implementingcorrective actions as needed.The SLAC EVMS is designed to provide project managers with a tool to promote optimal planning,accurate reporting, and effective control through the standardization of processes used in projectscope, schedule, and budget management.This document is organized into six (6) sections and four (4) appendices. The details of the EVMS, asit relates to the 32 ANSI/EIA-748-A guidelines, are discussed in these core chapters.The Appendices include: A – ANSI/EIA-748-A Guideline Crosswalk; B – Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Glossary of Terms; C – Roles and Responsibilities of the SLAC project team members; D – References.Whereas the SLAC EVMS is considered applicable for use on all SLAC projects, this document hasbeen tailored for the LCLS Project. Therefore configuration management of this EVMS document isthe responsibility of the LCLS Project Control Manager and is maintained through the use of projectconfiguration control. Proposed revisions to the LCLS EVMS description are submitted to the LCLSProject Management Office to ensure the proper coordination, review, and incorporation ofappropriate changes.Worth noting here is LCLS’s use of the term management reserve/contingency throughout thisdocument. The Office of Engineering and Construction Management’s (OECM) lexicon calls thismanagement reserve. SLAC uses the term contingency to describe the management reserve for totalestimated cost (TEC) and the term management reserve to describe the management reserve for otherproject costs (OPC).Throughout this document, cross references are made to the ANSI/EIA-748-A EVMS guidelinesusing a section number reference and a guideline number. The section references correspond to thecontent in Section 2 of the ANSI/EIA-748-A standard titled EVMS Guidelines. The guidelinenumbers correspond to the numbers assigned to the standard guidelines in the National DefenseIndustrial Association (NDIA) Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC) ANSI/EIA-748-AStandard for Earned Value Management Systems Intent Guide. For example, the NDIA IntentGuideline number 12 corresponds to the ANSI/EIA-748-A standard Section 2.2g. This will bereferred to in this document as Guide 12 {2.2g}.vi

Project Organization and Preliminary PlanningSection 1Project Organization and Preliminary Planning1.1 PROJECT STRUCTURE1.1.1Objective [Guide 1, 2, 3 {2.1a, b, c}]The projects has developed a Project Execution Plan (PEP) to organize and manage the project’sscope of work. Key project organization components of the PEP associated with EVMS are the WorkBreakdown Structure (WBS), the Organizational Breakdown Structure (OBS), and the ResponsibilityAssignment Matrix (RAM).1.1.2Project Execution Plan [Guide 3 {2.1c}]The Project Execution Plan (PEP) is the primary vehicle that correlates project objectives with a planfor accomplishment. It also serves as the agreement between DOE and the project director/deputyproject director on how the project will proceed.Among the principle elements, a project execution plan describes the responsibilities of the projectand DOE organizations involved in the project, defines roles and restates the mission need, provides ageneral overview of the project, and outlines cost and schedule data. The major elements required in aDOE project’s Project Execution Plan are stated in DOE Order 413.3 and DOE Manual 413.3-1.The Project Execution Plan is developed by the Federal Project Director, with input from the projectdirector/deputy project director. After obtaining concurrence from the Stanford Site Office (SSO), thePEP is formally approved by DOE headquarters. The Project Execution Plan is under configurationcontrol.1.1.3Work Breakdown Structure [Guide 1 {2.1a}]The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a product-oriented, hierarchical depiction of all workelements required to accomplish the entire work scope of the project. Each descending level is asubdivision of the work above, with increasingly detailed definition/division of the work. The WBS isthe structure for integrating the scope, schedule, and budget for all project work. It is used as aframework for assigning and defining work, schedule development, estimating and budgeting,managing funds, and controlling changes. The WBS is used by management throughout the lifecycleof a project to identify, assign, and track the project’s total work scope. Each element is assigned a1

LCLS Earned Value Management System Descriptionunique code to identify it in all project documents. The WBS is detailed in the PEP, or attached as anappendix.1.1.4Work Breakdown Structure Dictionary [Guide 1 {2.1a}]The project has developed a WBS dictionary. The WBS dictionary is a set of specific definitions thatdescribe the scope of each work element identified in the WBS. It defines each element to at least thecontrol account level in terms of the content of the work to be performed.1.1.5Organizational Breakdown Structure [Guide 2 {2.1b}]The Organizational Breakdown Structure (OBS) is a project organization framework for identificationof accountability, responsibility, management, and approvals of all authorized work scope. It is adirect representation and description of the hierarchy and organizations that will provide resources toplan and perform work identified in the WBS. The OBS helps management focus on establishing themost efficient organization, by taking into consideration availability and capability of managementand technical staff, including subcontractors, to achieve project objectives. The organizationalbreakdown structure for each project is found in the PEP.1.1.6Responsibility Assignment Matrix [Guide 3, 5 {2.1c, e}]The Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM) is an element of the project that integrates theorganizational breakdown structure with the work breakdown structure. This integration identifieskey control points at the intersections of the WBS and OBS. Control accounts are then created atthese key control points and they facilitate the linkage between the planning, scheduling, budgeting,work authorization, cost accumulation, and performance measurement processes. The controlaccounts are determined by the scope of the management tasks. A single control account manager(CAM) is assigned to one or more these control accounts and is responsible for the planning andcontrol within their control account(s) and the identification, analysis, and reporting of significantvariances that may occur during project execution. Using the RAM and OBS, the project is able toidentify the person/organization responsible and accountable for every element of the WBS andStatement of Work (SOW).1.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE1.2.1Objective [Guide 6, 7 {2.2a, b}]The project schedule is used to plan and control the interdependencies of all the activities needed toexecute the project. The project employs a scheduling tool that maintains the target schedule,supporting control milestones in the baseline, and the current schedule used to accumulate and reportcurrent schedule status.2

Project Organization and Preliminary Planning1.2.2Schedule Development [Guide 6, 7 {2.2a, b}]The development of the project schedule is the responsibility of the entire project team and mayinvolve multiple iterations in order to reach a workable plan for accomplishing the work scope.Technical leads from the various disciplines participate in these early iterations to identify theconstraints and interfaces. The control account managers expand these schedules into the detailneeded to identify the activities that will be performed in executing their assigned control accountresponsibilities. Project schedule details may evolve over time in a “rolling wave.” At the projectoutset, the details of the future schedule are generalized and the associated activities are of longerdurations, but in sufficient enough detail to allow the definition of the project critical path. As theproject moves through time and as activities are more clearly defined, new activities with shorterdurations are added. The scheduling system consists of baseline, current, and supplemental schedules.BASELINEThe baseline schedule contains the list of control milestones that are generally negotiated with theDOE and are identified in the Project Execution Plan. The project director/deputy project director hassupplemented these milestones with other events in a hierarchical structure deemed sufficientlyimportant to be in the baseline. The logic and activity relationships are established in the baselineschedule such that they support the timely accomplishment of the control milestones. The baselineschedule is assembled by the project management team. The project director/deputy project directorhas the responsibility to ensure that all parts of the baseline schedule properly mesh and phase witheach other. The baseline schedule should be consistent with constraints imposed externally, internally,by resource limitations or in the context of other projects at SLAC.The baseline schedule is approved and fixed consistent with DOE Order 413.3. The baseline scheduleconstitutes the official plan against which schedule performance is measured and reported to DOE,SLAC management, and project management. The baseline schedule is maintained underconfiguration management and may not be revised without proper authorization as detailed in theBaseline Change Control Thresholds table documented in the PEP.CURRENTThe current schedule is used to manage all project activities and is developed by logically networkingthe project activities. The schedule is an integrated, network-logic-based schedule. This networkapproach provides the ability to relate the project’s time-phased activities in their logical sequenceusing predecessor-successor relationships and timing. The current schedule also enables thedetermination of the critical path and an evaluation of the effects of the current schedule performancestatus on activities and milestones scheduled to be accomplished in the future. The current scheduleincludes detailed input from all control account managers, and provides the ability to relate activitiesand milestones between different levels of schedules. The current schedule includes all projectmilestones identified in the baseline schedule.3

LCLS Earned Value Management System DescriptionThe current schedule employs the approved baseline schedule to relate progress. The current scheduleshows the actual status of the project or program at the current point in time by reflecting the workperformed and the milestones accomplished. It is used by the project management team for analysis,including issue identification and resolution.SUPPLEMENTALThe project team may employ supplemental schedules that are not part of the baseline schedulehierarchy. They are often used for day-to-day operational planning and management, and as the namesuggests, supplement the baseline and current schedules, but are not under configuration control.1.3 PLANNING AND BUDGETING1.3.1Objective [Guide 8, 9, 15 {2.2c, d, j}]Planning and budgeting establish the time-phased budget used to measure project performance.1.3.2Performance Measurement Baseline [Guide 8, 9, 15{2.2c, d, j}]The performance measurement baseline (PMB) is the time-phased budget plan used to measureproject performance. In earned value management, the assignment or allocation of budgets toscheduled segments of work produces a plan against which actual performance is compared.The performance measurement baseline is finalized with Critical Decision-2 (CD2), ApprovePerformance Baseline. Figure 1-1 presents the DOE acquisition management development cycle. Therelationship of individual work tasks to the time-phased resources necessary to accomplish them isestablished at the control account level. As practical and meaningful, all control accounts and relatedwork packages should be planned, at least at a summary level, to the end of the project. It isanticipated that planning packages will be used in areas of the project where necessary. Any controlaccounts that cannot be established in the initial planning effort should identify the approach bywhich planning packages are detailed into work packages.The performance measurement baseline is the summation of the time-phased budgets for all of thecontrol accounts and summary-level planning packages, plus applicable indirect budgets and anyundistributed budget. The performance measurement baseline is a representation of current programplans. Proper maintenance of the baseline will prevent performance measurement against an outdatedor unauthorized plan.4

Project Organization and Preliminary PlanningFigure 1-1. DOE Acquisition Management System1.3.3Control Accounts [Guide 3, 5, 18 {2.1c, e, 2.3c}]A control account is a management control point at which budgets (resource plans) and actual costsare accumulated and compared to earned value for management control purposes. A control accountis a natural management point for planning and control since it represents the work assigned to oneresponsible organizational element for one WBS element.Within the financial accounting system, cost collection is performed at the control account level.Control accounts roll up into summary level accounts, which in turn roll up to an overall projectsummary account. No charges are directly charged or recorded at any summary level account.Accounts are called project IDs in the SLAC accounting system and are commonly referred to ascharge numbers. Multiple charge numbers, representing individual work packages, m

Systems (ANSI/EIA-748-A, January, 2006). The ANSI/EIA-748-A standard is an industry best practice as well as the official DOE and federal government standard for EVMS. Appendix A provides a crosswalk between the 32 ANSI/EIA-748-A guidelines and the SLAC EVMS. The SLAC EVMS is a key component

Related Documents:

Annex A (informative) Cost and performance measurement analysis using earned value management data Annex B (informative) Schedule Analysis using earned value management data (Earned Schedule) Annex C (informative) Integrating other project management processes with earned value management Annex D (informative) Bibliography EV Management

The method and its variations have been used under several names, such as earned value project management, earned value method, earned value analysis, and cost/schedule summary report (Fleming & Koppelman, 2003, 2010; Kim, 2000; Kim et al., 2003). 4.2 Earned Value Management Best Practicesxiv

In the Earned Value Analysis node (Earned Value Manager Earned Value Analysis), perform earned value analysis corresponding to an activity sheet. 1. Activity sheet data (WBS, CBS, and all projects) is consolidated, rolled up, and displayed in summary tables in an EV scenario. 2.

Ratio of value of work performed compared to spend Use . Cost Variance (Earned -Actual) as a guide in project forecasting. Look at % Cost. compared to % EV . Compare Earned Value with Plan Compare Earned Value (EV) against Planned Value (PV) Gives an independent check of schedule on a "volume of works" basis Schedule .

Earned Value Exercise 6 3 B C Earned 4 B C Earned 5 B C Earned 6 B C 7 B C 8 B C Earn Value Analysis: The table below shows on day 8th, with the baseline schedule following the Network Diagram above (Appendix E), the Cost Variance is -900, Schedule Variance is -700, CPI is 0.36 and SPI is 0.42.

earned value analysis. The goal for implementing the earned value and earned schedule methods on an actual construction project is to determine the validity of those methods to the industry. In order to gather the cost and schedule data in a more organized manner a database is created through various scheduling and spreadsheet based systems.

LBNL Earned Value Management System Introduction Revision 5.4 February 2009 1 of 56 INTRODUCTION Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratory operated by the University of California (UC), uses an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) to integrate project management elements required for

Integrating SE with Earned Value Management Mr. Paul Soloman, Performance-Based Earned Value 8801 - 1C7 - Tutorial: Integrating SE with Earned Value Management Mr. Paul Soloman, Performance-Based Earned Value TRACK 6 Mission III 9078 - 1A6 - Tutorial: Organizational Implications of SoS Ms. Suzann