GNAT Reference Manual

2y ago
29 Views
2 Downloads
1.27 MB
260 Pages
Last View : 3d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ronan Garica
Transcription

GNAT Reference ManualGNAT, The GNU Ada CompilerFor gcc version 4.5.4(GCC)AdaCore

Copyright c 1995-2008, Free Software Foundation, Inc.Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms ofthe GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the FreeSoftware Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover Texts being “GNATReference Manual”, and with no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in thesection entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”.

About This Guide1About This GuideThis manual contains useful information in writing programs using the GNAT compiler. Itincludes information on implementation dependent characteristics of GNAT, including allthe information required by Annex M of the Ada language standard.GNAT implements Ada 95 and Ada 2005, and it may also be invoked in Ada 83 compatibility mode. By default, GNAT assumes Ada 2005, but you can override with a compilerswitch to explicitly specify the language version. (Please refer to Section “Compiling Different Versions of Ada” in GNAT User’s Guide, for details on these switches.) Throughoutthis manual, references to “Ada” without a year suffix apply to both the Ada 95 and Ada2005 versions of the language.Ada is designed to be highly portable. In general, a program will have the same effecteven when compiled by different compilers on different platforms. However, since Ada isdesigned to be used in a wide variety of applications, it also contains a number of systemdependent features to be used in interfacing to the external world.Note: Any program that makes use of implementation-dependent features may be nonportable. You should follow good programming practice and isolate and clearly documentany sections of your program that make use of these features in a non-portable manner.What This Reference Manual ContainsThis reference manual contains the following chapters: Chapter 1 [Implementation Defined Pragmas], page 5, lists GNAT implementationdependent pragmas, which can be used to extend and enhance the functionality of thecompiler. Chapter 2 [Implementation Defined Attributes], page 63, lists GNAT implementationdependent attributes which can be used to extend and enhance the functionality of thecompiler. Chapter 3 [Implementation Advice], page 75, provides information on generally desirable behavior which are not requirements that all compilers must follow since it cannotbe provided on all systems, or which may be undesirable on some systems. Chapter 4 [Implementation Defined Characteristics], page 101, provides a guide tominimizing implementation dependent features. Chapter 5 [Intrinsic Subprograms], page 129, describes the intrinsic subprograms implemented by GNAT, and how they can be imported into user application programs. Chapter 6 [Representation Clauses and Pragmas], page 133, describes in detail the waythat GNAT represents data, and in particular the exact set of representation clausesand pragmas that is accepted. Chapter 7 [Standard Library Routines], page 157, provides a listing of packages and abrief description of the functionality that is provided by Ada’s extensive set of standardlibrary routines as implemented by GNAT. Chapter 8 [The Implementation of Standard I/O], page 167, details how the GNATimplementation of the input-output facilities. Chapter 9 [The GNAT Library], page 183, is a catalog of packages that complementthe Ada predefined library.

2GNAT Reference Manual Chapter 10 [Interfacing to Other Languages], page 199, describes how programs writtenin Ada using GNAT can be interfaced to other programming languages.Chapter 11 [Specialized Needs Annexes], page 201, describes the GNAT implementationof all of the specialized needs annexes. Chapter 12 [Implementation of Specific Ada Features], page 203, discusses issues related to GNAT’s implementation of machine code insertions, tasking, and several otherfeatures. Chapter 13 [Project File Reference], page 213, presents the syntax and semantics ofproject files. Chapter 14 [Obsolescent Features], page 229 documents implementation dependentfeatures, including pragmas and attributes, which are considered obsolescent, sincethere are other preferred ways of achieving the same results. These obsolescent formsare retained for backwards compatibility.This reference manual assumes a basic familiarity with the Ada 95 language, as describedin the International Standard ANSI/ISO/IEC-8652:1995, January 1995. It does not require knowledge of the new features introduced by Ada 2005, (officially known as ISO/IEC8652:1995 with Technical Corrigendum 1 and Amendment 1). Both reference manuals areincluded in the GNAT documentation package.ConventionsFollowing are examples of the typographical and graphic conventions used in this guide: Functions, utility program names, standard names, and classes. Option flags ‘File names’, ‘button names’, and ‘field names’. Variables, environment variables, and metasyntactic variables. Emphasis. [optional information or parameters] Examples are described by textand then shown this way.Commands that are entered by the user are preceded in this manual by the characters ‘ ’ (dollar sign followed by space). If your system uses this sequence as a prompt, then thecommands will appear exactly as you see them in the manual. If your system uses someother prompt, then the command will appear with the ‘ ’ replaced by whatever promptcharacter you are using.Related InformationSee the following documents for further information on GNAT: See Section “About This Guide” in GNAT User’s Guide, which provides informationon how to use the GNAT compiler system. Ada 95 Reference Manual, which contains all reference material for the Ada 95 programming language.

About This Guide3 Ada 95 Annotated Reference Manual, which is an annotated version of the Ada 95standard. The annotations describe detailed aspects of the design decision, and inparticular contain useful sections on Ada 83 compatibility. Ada 2005 Reference Manual, which contains all reference material for the Ada 2005programming language. Ada 2005 Annotated Reference Manual, which is an annotated version of the Ada 2005standard. The annotations describe detailed aspects of the design decision, and inparticular contain useful sections on Ada 83 and Ada 95 compatibility. DEC Ada, Technical Overview and Comparison on DIGITAL Platforms, which containsspecific information on compatibility between GNAT and DEC Ada 83 systems. DEC Ada, Language Reference Manual, part number AA-PYZAB-TK which describesin detail the pragmas and attributes provided by the DEC Ada 83 compiler system.

Chapter 1: Implementation Defined Pragmas51 Implementation Defined PragmasAda defines a set of pragmas that can be used to supply additional information to thecompiler. These language defined pragmas are implemented in GNAT and work as describedin the Ada Reference Manual.In addition, Ada allows implementations to define additional pragmas whose meaning isdefined by the implementation. GNAT provides a number of these implementation-definedpragmas, which can be used to extend and enhance the functionality of the compiler. Thissection of the GNAT Reference Manual describes these additional pragmas.Note that any program using these pragmas might not be portable to other compilers(although GNAT implements this set of pragmas on all platforms). Therefore if portability to other compilers is an important consideration, the use of these pragmas should beminimized.Pragma Abort DeferSyntax:pragma Abort Defer;This pragma must appear at the start of the statement sequence of a handled sequence ofstatements (right after the begin). It has the effect of deferring aborts for the sequence ofstatements (but not for the declarations or handlers, if any, associated with this statementsequence).Pragma Ada 83Syntax:pragma Ada 83;A configuration pragma that establishes Ada 83 mode for the unit to which it applies,regardless of the mode set by the command line switches. In Ada 83 mode, GNAT attemptsto be as compatible with the syntax and semantics of Ada 83, as defined in the originalAda 83 Reference Manual as possible. In particular, the keywords added by Ada 95 andAda 2005 are not recognized, optional package bodies are allowed, and generics may nametypes with unknown discriminants without using the ( ) notation. In addition, some butnot all of the additional restrictions of Ada 83 are enforced.Ada 83 mode is intended for two purposes. Firstly, it allows existing Ada 83 code to becompiled and adapted to GNAT with less effort. Secondly, it aids in keeping code backwardscompatible with Ada 83. However, there is no guarantee that code that is processed correctlyby GNAT in Ada 83 mode will in fact compile and execute with an Ada 83 compiler, sinceGNAT does not enforce all the additional checks required by Ada 83.Pragma Ada 95Syntax:pragma Ada 95;A configuration pragma that establishes Ada 95 mode for the unit to which it applies,regardless of the mode set by the command line switches. This mode is set automaticallyfor the Ada and System packages and their children, so you need not specify it in these

6GNAT Reference Manualcontexts. This pragma is useful when writing a reusable component that itself uses Ada 95features, but which is intended to be usable from either Ada 83 or Ada 95 programs.Pragma Ada 05Syntax:pragma Ada 05;A configuration pragma that establishes Ada 2005 mode for the unit to which it applies,regardless of the mode set by the command line switches. This mode is set automaticallyfor the Ada and System packages and their children, so you need not specify it in thesecontexts. This pragma is useful when writing a reusable component that itself uses Ada2005 features, but which is intended to be usable from either Ada 83 or Ada 95 programs.Pragma Ada 2005Syntax:pragma Ada 2005;This configuration pragma is a synonym for pragma Ada 05 and has the same syntax andeffect.Pragma AnnotateSyntax:pragma Annotate (IDENTIFIER [,IDENTIFIER] {, ARG});ARG :: NAME EXPRESSIONThis pragma is used to annotate programs. identifier identifies the type of annotation.GNAT verifies that it is an identifier, but does not otherwise analyze it. The second optionalidentifier is also left unanalyzed, and by convention is used to control the action of the toolto which the annotation is addressed. The remaining arg arguments can be either stringliterals or more generally expressions. String literals are assumed to be either of typeStandard.String or else Wide String or Wide Wide String depending on the characterliterals they contain. All other kinds of arguments are analyzed as expressions, and mustbe unambiguous.The analyzed pragma is retained in the tree, but not otherwise processed by any part ofthe GNAT compiler. This pragma is intended for use by external tools, including ASIS.Pragma AssertSyntax:pragma Assert (boolean EXPRESSION[, string EXPRESSION]);The effect of this pragma depends on whether the corresponding command line switch isset to activate assertions. The pragma expands into code equivalent to the following:if assertions-enabled thenif not boolean EXPRESSION thenSystem.Assertions.Raise Assert Failure(string EXPRESSION);

Chapter 1: Implementation Defined Pragmas7end if;end if;The string argument, if given, is the message that will be associated with the exceptionoccurrence if the exception is raised. If no second argument is given, the default message is‘file :nnn ’, where file is the name of the source file containing the assert, and nnn is theline number of the assert. A pragma is not a statement, so if a statement sequence containsnothing but a pragma assert, then a null statement is required in addition, as in:.if J 3 thenpragma Assert (K 3, "Bad value for K");null;end if;Note that, as with the if statement to which it is equivalent, the type of the expression iseither Standard.Boolean, or any type derived from this standard type.If assertions are disabled (switch ‘-gnata’ not used), then there is no run-time effect(and in particular, any side effects from the expression will not occur at run time). (Theexpression is still analyzed at compile time, and may cause types to be frozen if they arementioned here for the first time).If assertions are enabled, then the given expression is tested, and if it is False thenSystem.Assertions.Raise Assert Failure is called which results in the raising ofAssert Failure with the given message.You should generally avoid side effects in the expression arguments of this pragma, because these side effects will turn on and off with the setting of the assertions mode, resultingin assertions that have an effect on the program. However, the expressions are analyzed forsemantic correctness whether or not assertions are enabled, so turning assertions on and offcannot affect the legality of a program.Pragma Assume No Invalid ValuesSyntax:pragma Assume No Invalid Values (On Off);This is a configuration pragma that controls the assumptions made by the compiler aboutthe occurrence of invalid representations (invalid values) in the code.The default behavior (corresponding to an Off argument for this pragma), is to assumethat values may in general be invalid unless the compiler can prove they are valid. Considerthe following example:V1 : Integer range 1 . 10;V2 : Integer range 11 . 20;.for J in V2 . V1 loop.end loop;if V1 and V2 have valid values, then the loop is known at compile time not to execute sincethe lower bound must be greater than the upper bound. However in default mode, no suchassumption is made, and the loop may execute. If Assume No Invalid Values (On) isgiven, the compiler will assume that any occurrence of a variable other than in an explicit’Valid test always has a valid value, and the loop above will be optimized away.

8GNAT Reference ManualThe use of Assume No Invalid Values (On) is appropriate if you know your code isfree of uninitialized variables and other possible sources of invalid representations, and mayresult in more efficient code. A program that accesses an invalid representation with thispragma in effect is erroneous, so no guarantees can be made about its behavior.It is peculiar though permissible to use this pragma in conjunction with validity checking(-gnatVa). In such cases, accessing invalid values will generally give an exception, thoughformally the program is erroneous so there are no guarantees that this will always be thecase, and it is recommended that these two options not be used together.Pragma Ast EntrySyntax:pragma AST Entry (entry IDENTIFIER);This pragma is implemented only in the OpenVMS implementation of GNAT. The argument is the simple name of a single entry; at most one AST Entry pragma is allowed for anygiven entry. This pragma must be used in conjunction with the AST Entry attribute, andis only allowed after the entry declaration and in the same task type specification or singletask as the entry to which it applies. This pragma specifies that the given entry may beused to handle an OpenVMS asynchronous system trap (AST) resulting from an OpenVMSsystem service call. The pragma does not affect normal use of the entry. For further detailson this pragma, see the DEC Ada Language Reference Manual, section 9.12a.Pragma C Pass By CopySyntax:pragma C Pass By Copy([Max Size ] static integer EXPRESSION);Normally the default mechanism for passing C convention records to C convention subprograms is to pass them by reference, as suggested by RM B.3(69). Use the configurationpragma C Pass By Copy to change this default, by requiring that record formal parametersbe passed by copy if all of the following conditions are met: The size of the record type does not exceed the value specified for Max Size. The record type has Convention C. The formal parameter has this record type, and the subprogram has a foreign (non-Ada)convention.If these conditions are met the argument is passed by copy, i.e. in a manner consistent withwhat C expects if the corresponding formal in the C prototype is a struct (rather than apointer to a struct).You can also pass records by copy by specifying the convention C Pass By Copy for therecord type, or by using the extended Import and Export pragmas, which allow specificationof passing mechanisms on a parameter by parameter basis.Pragma CheckSyntax:

Chapter 1: Implementation Defined Pragmas9pragma Check ([Name ] Identifier,[Check ] Boolean EXPRESSION[, [Message ] string EXPRESSION] );This pragma is similar to the predefined pragma Assert except that an extra identifierargument is present. In conjunction with pragma Check Policy, this can be used to definegroups of assertions that can be independently controlled. The identifier Assertion is special, it refers to the normal set of pragma Assert statements. The identifiers Preconditionand Postcondition correspond to the pragmas of these names, so these three names wouldnormally not be used directly in a pragma Check.Checks introduced by this pragma are normally deactivated by default. They can beactivated either by the command line option ‘-gnata’, which turns on all checks, or individually controlled using pragma Check Policy.Pragma Check NameSyntax:pragma Check Name (check name IDENTIFIER);This is a configuration pragma that defines a new implementation defined check name(unless IDENTIFIER matches one of the predefined check names, in which case the pragmahas no effect). Check names are global to a partition, so if two or more configurationpragmas are present in a partition mentioning the same name, only one new check name isintroduced.An implementation defined check name introduced with this pragma may be used inonly three contexts: pragma Suppress, pragma Unsuppress, and as the prefix of a CheckName’Enabled attribute reference. For any of these three cases, the check name must bevisible. A check name is visible if it is in the configuration pragmas applying to the currentunit, or if it appears at the start of any unit that is part of the dependency set of the currentunit (e.g., units that are mentioned in with clauses).Pragma Check PolicySyntax:pragma Check Policy([Name ] Identifier,[Policy ] POLICY IDENTIFIER);POLICY IDENTIFIER :: On Off Check IgnoreThis pragma is similar to the predefined pragma Assertion Policy, except that it controls sets of named assertions introduced using the Check pragmas. It can be used as aconfiguration pragma or (unlike Assertion Policy) can be used within a declarative part,in which case it controls the status to the end of the corresponding construct (in a manneridentical to pragma Suppress).The identifier given as the first argument corresponds to a name used in associated Checkpragmas. For example, if the pragma:pragma Check Policy (Critical Error, Off);

10GNAT Reference Manualis given, then subsequent Check pragmas whose first argument is also Critical Error willbe disabled. The special identifier Assertion controls the behavior of normal Assert pragmas (thus a pragma Check Policy with this identifier is similar to the normal AssertionPolicy pragma except that it can appear within a declarative part).The special identifiers Precondition and Postcondition control the status of preconditions and postconditions. If a Precondition pragma is encountered, it is ignored if turnedoff by a Check Policy specifying that Precondition checks are Off or Ignored. Similarlyuse of the name Postcondition controls whether Postcondition pragmas are recognized.The check policy is Off to turn off corresponding checks, and On to turn on correspondingchecks. The default for a set of checks for which no Check Policy is given is Off unlessthe compiler switch ‘-gnata’ is given, which turns on all checks by default.The check policy settings Check and Ignore are also recognized as synonyms for On andOff. These synonyms are provided for compatibility with the standard Assertion Policypragma.Pragma CommentSyntax:pragma Comment (static string EXPRESSION);This is almost identical in effect to pragma Ident. It allows the placement of a commentinto the object file and hence into the executable file if the operating system permits suchusage. The difference is that Comment, unlike Ident, has no limitations on placement of thepragma (it can be placed anywhere in the main source unit), and if more than one pragmais used, all comments are retained.Pragma Common ObjectSyntax:pragma Common Object ([Internal ] LOCAL NAME[, [External ] EXTERNAL SYMBOL][, [Size ] EXTERNAL SYMBOL] );EXTERNAL SYMBOL :: IDENTIFIER static string EXPRESSIONThis pragma enables the shared use of variables stored in overlaid linker areas correspondingto the use of COMMON in Fortran. The single object LOCAL NAME is assigned to the areadesignated by the External argument. You may define a record to correspond to a series offields. The Size argument is syntax checked in GNAT, but otherwise ignored.Common Object is not supported on all platforms. If no support is available, then thecode generator will issue a message indicating that the necessary attribute for implementation of this pragma is not available.Pragma Compile Time ErrorSyntax:

Chapter 1: Implementation Defined Pragmas11pragma Compile Time Error(boolean EXPRESSION, static string EXPRESSION);This pragma can be used to generate additional compile time error messages. It is particularly useful in generics, where errors can be issued for specific problematic instantiations.The first parameter is a boolean expression. The pragma is effective only if the value of thisexpression is known at compile time, and has the value True. The set of expressions whosevalues are known at compile time includes all static boolean expressions, and also othervalues which the compiler can determine at compile time (e.g., the size of a record type setby an explicit size representation clause, or the value of a variable which was initialized toa constant and is known not to have been modified). If these conditions are met, an errormessage is generated using the value given as the second argument. This string value maycontain embedded ASCII.LF characters to break the message into multiple lines.Pragma Compile Time WarningSyntax:pragma Compile Time Warning(boolean EXPRESSION, static string EXPRESSION);Same as pragma Compile Time Error, except a warning is issued instead of an error message. Note that if this pragma is used in a package that is with’ed by a client, the clientwill get the warning even though it is issued by a with’ed package (normally warnings inwith’ed units are suppressed, but this is a special exception to that rule).One typical use is within a generic where compile time known characteristics of formalparameters are tested, and warnings given appropriately. Another use with a first parameter of True is to warn a client about use of a package, for example that it is not fullyimplemented.Pragma Compiler UnitSyntax:pragma Compiler Unit;This pragma is intended only for internal use in the GNAT run-time library. It indicatesthat the unit is used as part of the compiler build. The effect is to disallow constructs (raisewith message, conditional expressions etc) that would cause trouble when bootstrappingusing an older version of GNAT. For the exact list of restrictions, see the compiler sourcesand references to Is Compiler Unit.Pragma Complete RepresentationSyntax:pragma Complete Representation;This pragma must appear immediately within a record representation clause. Typical placements are before the first component clause or after the last component clause. The effect isto give an error message if any component is missing a component clause. This pragma maybe used to ensure that a record representation clause is complete, and that this invariant ismaintained if fields are added to the record in the future.

12GNAT Reference ManualPragma Complex RepresentationSyntax:pragma Complex Representation([Entity ] LOCAL NAME);The Entity argument must be the name of a record type which has two fields of the samefloating-point type. The effect of this pragma is to force gcc to use the special internalcomplex representation form for this record, which may be more efficient. Note that thismay result in the code for this type not conforming to standard ABI (application binaryinterface) requirements for the handling of record types. For example, in some environments,there is a requirement for passing records by pointer, and the use of this pragma may resultin passing this type in floating-point registers.Pragma Component AlignmentSyntax:pragma Component Alignment ([Form ] ALIGNMENT CHOICE[, [Name ] type LOCAL NAME]);ALIGNMENT CHOICE :: Component Size Component Size 4 Storage Unit DefaultSpecifies the alignment of components in array or record types. The meaning of the Formargument is as follows:Component SizeAligns scalar components and subcomponents of the array or record type onboundaries appropriate to their inherent size (naturally aligned). For example,1-byte components are aligned on byte boundaries, 2-byte integer componentsare aligned on 2-byte boundaries, 4-byte integer components are aligned on 4byte boundaries and so on. These alignment rules correspond to the normalrules for C compilers on all machines except the VAX.Component Size 4Naturally aligns components with a size of four or fewer bytes. Componentsthat are larger than 4 bytes are placed on the next 4-byte boundary.Storage UnitSpecifies that array or record components are byte aligned, i.e. aligned onboundaries determined by the value of the constant System.Storage Unit.DefaultSpecifies that array or record components are aligned on default boundaries,appropriate to the underlying hardware or operating system or both. For OpenVMS VAX systems, the Default choice is the same as the Storage Unit choice(byte alignment). For all other systems, the Default choice is the same asComponent Size (natural alignment).If the Name parameter is present, type LOCAL NAME must refer to a local record or arraytype, and the specified alignment choice applies to the specified type. The use of ComponentAlignment together with a pragma Pack causes the Component Alignment pragma to be

Chapter 1: Implementation Defined Pragmas13ignored. The use of Component Alignment together with a record representation clause isonly effective for fields not specified by the representation clause.If the Name parameter is absent, the pragma can be used as either a configuration pragma,in which case it applies to one or more units in accordance with the normal rules forconfiguration pragmas, or it can be used within a declarative part, in which case it appliesto types that are declared within this declarative part, or within any nested scope withinthis declarative part. In either case it specifies the alignment to be applied to any recordor array type which has otherwise standard representation.If the alignment for a record or array type is not specified (using pragma Pack, pragmaComponent Alignment, or a record rep clause), the GNAT uses the default alignment asdescribed previously.Pragma Convention IdentifierSyntax:pragma Convention Identifier ([Name ]IDENTIFIER,[Convention ] convention IDENTIFIER);This pragma provides a mechanism for supplying synonyms for existing convention identifiers. The Name identifier can subsequently be used as a synonym for the given convention inother pragmas (including for example pragma Import or another Convention Identifierpragma). As an example of the use of this, suppose you had legacy code which used Fortran77 as the identifier for Fortran. Then the pragma:pragma Convention Identifier (Fortran77, Fortran);would allow the use of the convention identifier Fortran77 in subsequent code, avoidingthe need to modify the sources. As another example, you could use this to parametrizeconvention requirements according to systems. Suppose you needed to use Stdcall onwindows systems, and C on some other system, then you could define a convention identifierLibrary and use a single Convention Identifier pragma to specify which conventionwould be used system-wide.Pragma CPP ClassSyntax:pragma CPP Class ([Entity ] LOCAL NAME);The argument denotes an entity in the current declarative region that is declared as a recordtype. It indicates that the type corresponds to an externally declared C class type, andis to be laid out the same way that C would lay out the type. If the C class has virtualprimitives then the record must be declared as a tagged record type.Types for which CPP Class is specified do not have assignment or equality operatorsdefined (such operations can be imported or declared as subprograms as required). Initialization is allowed only by constructor functions (see pragma CPP Constructor). Suchtypes are implicitly limited if not explicitly declared as limited or derived from a limitedtype, and an error is issued in that case.Pragma CPP Class is intended primarily for automatic generation using an automaticbinding generator tool. See Section 10.2 [Interfacing to C ], page 200 for related information.

14GNAT Reference ManualNote: Pragma CPP Class is currently obsolete. It is supported for backward compatibility but its functionality is available using pragma Import with Convention CPP.Pragma CPP ConstructorSyntax:pragma CPP Constructor ([Entity ] LOCAL NAME[, [External Name ] static string EXPRESSION ][, [Link Name ] static string EXPRESSION ]);This pragma identifies an imported function (imported in the usual way with pragmaImport) as corresponding to a C constructor. If External Name and Link Name arenot specified then the Entity argument is a name that must have been previously mentioned in a pragma Import with Convention CPP. Such name must be of one of thefollowing forms: function Fname return T function Fname return T ’Class function Fname (.) return T functi

Ada 2005 Reference Manual, which contains all reference material for the Ada 2005 programming language. Ada 2005 Annotated Reference Manual, which is an annotated version of the Ada 2005 standard. The annotations describe detailed aspects of the design decision, and in particular contain useful sections on Ada 83 and Ada 95 compatibility.

Related Documents:

The main idea is what the text is about. Details help us find the main idea. Circle the correct answers. 1 Which best describes the main idea of the text? a A lion attacked a gnat. b A lion fell down. c A gnat wanted to be a lion. d A gnat attacked a lion. 2 downWhich two details support the main idea

compile Ada programs without gnatmake by running the compiler and linker separately. There are sometimes good reasons to do that. However, for the programs you will write as a beginning Ada programmer, you should get into the habit of using gnatmake. Note that GNAT comes with a graphical Ada programming environment named GPS (GNAT Programming .

compile Ada programs without gnatmake by running the compiler and linker separately. There are sometimes good reasons to do that. However, for the programs you will write as a beginning Ada programmer, you should get into the habit of using gnatmake. Note that GNAT comes with a graphical Ada programming environment named GPS (GNAT Programming .

and more features of Ada 2005 got implemented in GNAT and ASIS-for-GNAT. However, presently, none of them fully supports the Ada 2005 standard, which is why the current versions of our tools do not support the whole language set of Ada 2005 either. 1.2 Syntax Trees An abstract syntax tree (AST) is defined [3] as a tree in which each node .

GNAT PASS PROPERTY CLAIM MAP AUNUM SCOLOSICAL CONSULTANTS INC. JUNE 1990 NTS 1041/Drow5 n by GS Seal* 1'5000Figur0 e 2 . 6 HISTORY The first record of exploration on ground now covered by the Gnat Pass property was i when 196n Cassia 0 r Asbestos Corporation discovered low

and a portion (25,000) of each group is coded wire tagged prior to transfer. Rear 650,000 smolts to a size of 12 fpp for release into Gnat Creek in mid-March. All fish are marked, and a portion (25,000) is coded-wire tagged prior to release. . A Flow Index is used to estimate the rearing unit's carrying capacity based on water flows. Fish .

Fungus gnats (Bradysia. sp. Sciaridae) are a common problem in greenhouse crops, as they like high levels of organic matter and moisture. Figure 1. Fungus gnat on yellow sticky trap. Adult fungus gnats can be found sitting on the surface of plastics and media, and flying around the bottom of plants. They are small (5 mm) black flies

Classical approach to management is a set of homogeneous ideas on the management of organizations that evolved in the late 19 th century and early 20 century. This perspective emerges from the industrial revolution and centers on theories of efficiency. As at the end of the 19th century, when factory production became pervasive and large scale organizations raised, people have been looking for .