Standard Glossary Of Terms Used In Software Testing .

2y ago
19 Views
2 Downloads
289.48 KB
81 Pages
Last View : 18d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Axel Lin
Transcription

Standard Glossary of Terms Used inSoftware TestingVersion 3.01All TermsInternational Software Testing Qualifications BoardCopyright International Software Testing Qualifications Board (hereinafter called ISTQB ).This document may be copied in its entirety, or extracts made, if the source is acknowledged.Edited by:ISTQB Glossary Working Group, Judy McKay (Chair), Matthias Hamburg (Vice-Chair), 2015.This document version 3.01 is a technical revision of version 3.0, which has been formally released byththe General Assembly of the ISTQB on March 26 , 2015.

GlossaryStandard Glossary of Terms used in Software TestingInternationalSoftware TestingQualifications BoardIntroduction to this GlossaryScopeThe ISTQB Glossary contains the definitions of testing terms used in the different ISTQB syllabi. Thisincludes all terms stated as keywords in the ISTQB syllabi, as well as other terms of major importance.This document contains a report of all terms contained in the ISTQB Glossary.This Glossary focuses on terms that have a specific meaning in testing. Some related non-testingterms are also included if they play a major role in testing, such as terms used in software qualityassurance and software lifecycle models. However, most terms of other software engineeringdisciplines are not covered in this document, even if they are used in various ISTQB syllabi.Purpose of the ISTQB GlossaryThe ISTQB Glossary has two main objectives: Support the ISTQB syllabi by defining the terms used in the various syllabi Support communication within the international testing community and with its stakeholders byproviding a standard testing vocabularyIn compiling this glossary, the Working Group has sought the views and comments of a broadspectrum of opinion in industry, commerce and government bodies and organizations, with the aim ofproducing an international testing standard that would gain wide acceptance. Total agreement willrarely, if ever, be achieved in compiling a document of this nature. Contributions to this glossary havebeen received from testing communities from all over the world.Being written in English, the current version of the Glossary is designed to also support otherlanguages. ISTQB Member Boards are encouraged to incorporate their translations.Glossary StructureThe glossary has been arranged in a single section of terms and their definitions, orderedalphabetically. For each term, the following additional attributes are shown where applicable:- Synonyms: Some terms are preferred to other synonymous ones, in which case, the preferredterm appears as an entry, with the synonyms indicated.- See also: These entries contain cross-references to related terms. Such cross-references areindicated for relationships such as broader term to a narrower term, and overlapping meaningbetween two terms.- Ref: without the addition of “after”, e.g., ISO 9126, this means that the exact definition of thereference is used. In case of minor changes used to adapt the definition to the context of theISTQB Glossary, the addition “after” is used, e.g., Ref: After ISO 9126. The complete list ofreferences used in the ISTQB Glossary is listed below.AcknowledgementsThis Glossary has been produced by the Glossary Working Group of the International SoftwareTesting Qualifications Board (ISTQB).At the time the Glossary version 3.0 was completed the Glossary Working Group had the followingmembers (alphabetic order):Vineta Arnicane (Latvia), Armin Beer (Austria), Armin Born (Switzerland), Mette Bruhn-Pedersen(Denmark), Gerg Collina (USA), Ernst Dűring (Norway), George Fialkovitz (Brazil), Matthias Hamburg(Vice Chair, Germany), Ian Howles (Great Britain), Gábor Kapros (Hungary), Ozgur Kisir (Turkey),Marek Majernik (Slovakia), Gustavo Marquez-Sosa (Spain), Judy McKay (Chair, USA), GaryVersion 3.01 International Software Testing Qualifications Board27. May 2015i

GlossaryStandard Glossary of Terms used in Software TestingInternationalSoftware TestingQualifications BoardMogyorodi (Canada), Avi Ofer (Israel), Ana Paiva (Portugal), Juha Pomppu (Finnland), MeilePosthuma (Netherlands). Lucjan Stapp (Poland).Our special thanks go to the testers of the interactive version 3.0 for their voluntary support, and toNicholas Humphries for the development of the new interactive application.Many more people, who are not mentioned here by name, have contributed to different versions of thisGlossary. The editors would like to thank them all for their contributions.ReferencesStandards[DO-178b] DO-178B:1992. Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification,Requirements and Technical Concepts for Aviation (RTCA SC167)[IEEE 610] IEEE 610.12:1990. Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology.[IEEE 829] IEEE 829:1998. Standard for Software Test Documentation[IEEE 1008] IEEE 1008:1993. Standard for Software Unit Testing[IEEE 1028] IEEE 1028:1997. Standard for Software Reviews and Audits[IEEE 1044] IEEE 1044:1993. Standard Classification for Software Anomalies[IEEE 1219] IEEE 1219:1998. Software Maintenance[ISO 2382/1] ISO/IEC 2382-1:1993. Data processing - Vocabulary - Part 1: Fundamental terms[ISO 8402] ISO 8402: 1994. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Vocabulary[ISO 9000] ISO 9000:2005. Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary[ISO 9126] ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001. Software Engineering – Software Product Quality – Part 1: Qualitycharacteristics and sub-characteristics[ISO 12207] ISO/IEC 12207:1995. Information Technology – Software Lifecycle Processes[ISO 14598] ISO/IEC 14598-1:1999. Information Technology – Software Product Evaluation - Part 1:General Overview[ISO 15504] ISO/IEC 15504-9: 1998. Information Technology – Software Process Assessment – Part9: VocabularyBooks and Papers[Adrion] W. Adrion, M. Branstad and J. Cherniabsky (1982), Validation, Verification and Testing ofComputer Software, in: Computing Surveys, Vol. 14, No 2, June 1982[Akao] Akao, Yoji (1994), Development History of Quality Function Deployment - The Customer DrivenApproach to Quality Planning and Deployment, Minato, Tokyo 107 Japan: Asian ProductivityOrganization, pp. 339, ISBN 92-833-1121-3nd[Bach] J. Bach (2004), Exploratory Testing, in: E. van Veenendaal, The Testing Practitioner – 2edition, UTN Publishing, ISBN 90-72194-65-9[Beizer] B. Beizer (1990), Software Testing Techniques, van Nostrand Reinhold, ISBN 0-442-20672-0[Chow] T. Chow (1978), Testing Software Design Modelled by Finite-Sate Machines, in: IEEETransactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 4, No 3, May 1978Version 3.01 International Software Testing Qualifications Board27. May 2015ii

InternationalSoftware TestingQualifications BoardGlossaryStandard Glossary of Terms used in Software Testing[CMM] M. Paulk, C. Weber, B. Curtis and M.B. Chrissis (1995), The Capability Maturity Model,Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-54664-7[CMMI] M.B. Chrissis, M. Konrad and S. Shrum (2004), CMMI, Guidelines for Process Integration andProduct Improvement, Addison Wesley, ISBN 0-321-15496-7[Deming] D. W. Edwards (1986), Out of the Crisis, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, ISBN0-911379-01-0[Egler63] J. F. Egler. 1963. A procedure for converting logic table conditions into an efficient sequenceof test instructions. Commun. ACM 6, 9 (September 1963), 510-514. DOI 10.1145/367593.367595[Fenton] N. Fenton (1991), Software Metrics: a Rigorous Approach, Chapman & Hall, ISBN 0-53249425-1[Fewster and Graham] M. Fewster and D. Graham (1999), Software Test Automation, Effective use oftest execution tools, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-33140-3[Freedman and Weinberg] D. Freedman and G. Weinberg (1990), Walkthroughs, Inspections, andTechnical Reviews, Dorset House Publishing, ISBN 0-932633-19-6[Garvin] D.A. Garvin (1984), What does product quality really mean?, in: Sloan Management Review,Vol. 26, nr. 1 1984[Gerrard] P. Gerrard and N. Thompson (2002), Risk-Based E-Business Testing, Artech HousePublishers, ISBN 1-58053-314-0[Gilb and Graham] T. Gilb and D. Graham (1993), Software Inspection, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-20163181-4[Graham] D. Graham, E. van Veenendaal, I. Evans and R. Black (2007), Foundations of SoftwareTesting, Thomson Learning, ISBN 978-1-84480-355-2[Grochtmann] M. Grochtmann (1994), Test Case Design Using Classification Trees, in: ConferenceProceedings STAR 1994nd[Hetzel] W. Hetzel (1988), The complete guide to software testing – 2Sciences, ISBN 0-89435-242-3edition, QED Information[Juran] J.M. Juran (1979), Quality Control Handbook, McGraw-Hill[Kirakowski93] J. Kirakowski, M Corbett (1993), SUMI: the Software Usability Measurement Inventory,British Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 24, Issue 3, pages 210–212, September 1993[McCabe] T. McCabe (1976), A complexity measure, in: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,Vol. 2, pp. 308-320[Musa] J. Musa (1998), Software Reliability Engineering Testing, McGraw-Hill Education, ISBN 007913-271-5[TMap] M. Pol, R. Teunissen, E. van Veenendaal (2002), Software Testing, A guide to the TMapApproach, Addison Wesley, ISBN 0-201-745712[TMMi] E. van Veenendaal and J. Cannegieter (2011), The Little TMMi, UTN Publishing, ISBN 9789490986-03-2[Veenendaal08] E. van Veenendaal (2008), Test Improvement Manifesto, in: Testing Experience,Issue 04/08, December 2008TrademarksIn the ISTQB Glossary the following trademarks are used:CMMI and IDEAL are registered trademarks of Carnegie Mellon UniversityEFQM is a registered trademark of the EFQM FoundationRational Unified Process (RUP) is a registered trademark of Rational Software CorporationSTEP is a registered trademark of Software Quality EngineeringVersion 3.01 International Software Testing Qualifications Board27. May 2015iii

InternationalSoftware TestingQualifications BoardGlossaryStandard Glossary of Terms used in Software Testing-TMap, TPA and TPI Next are registered trademarks of Sogeti Nederland BVTMMi is a registered trademark of the TMMi FoundationRevision eRemarks31 May 2007Maintenance version2 December 2007 Missing terms used in the Foundation Level and Advanced Levelsyllabi added.Maintenance based on change requests raised by users.1 April 2010New keywords from the Expert Level syllabus Improving the TestingProcess added.Missing terms used in the Advanced Level syllabus added.Some inconsistencies resolved.19 October 2012 New keywords from the Expert Level syllabus Test Managementadded.Updates to support the new version 2012 of the Advanced Levelsyllabi.Maintenance based on change requests raised by users.28 March 2014New keywords from the Foundation Extension Agile Tester syllabusadded.Maintenance based on change requests raised by users.4 July 2014New keywords from the Expert Level Test Automation – Engineersyllabus added. Document reformatted to ISTQB standard format.Verbiage in 0.x sections clarified and edited.26 March 2015Migration from paper-based to database storage for the Glossary.Implementation of syllabus-based reporting. Additional words for theETM syllabus have been added and the keywords for the MBTsyllabus have been added. Cleanup has been performed forconsistency in hyphenation and formatting as well as spellingcorrections.27 May 2015Technical revision: Re-alignment with syllabus usage.A list of terms changed in a specific release can be retrieved in the interactive presentation layer.Version 3.01 International Software Testing Qualifications Board27. May 2015iv

ISTQB Glossary Report - All Termsacceptance criteriaRef: IEEE 610The exit criteria that a component or system must satisfy in order to be accepted by a user,customer, or other authorized entity.acceptance testingRef: After IEEE 610See Also: user acceptance testingFormal testing with respect to user needs, requirements, and business processes conducted todetermine whether or not a system satisfies the acceptance criteria and to enable the user,customers or other authorized entity to determine whether or not to accept the system.accessibility testingRef: GerrardTesting to determine the ease by which users with disabilities can use a component or system.accuracyRef: ISO 9126See Also: functionalityThe capability of the software product to provide the right or agreed results or effects with theneeded degree of precision.accuracy testingSee Also: accuracyTesting to determine the accuracy of a software product.acting (IDEAL)See Also: IDEALThe phase within the IDEAL model where the improvements are developed, put into practice, anddeployed across the organization. The acting phase consists of the activities: create solution,pilot/test solution, refine solution and implement solution.actorUser or any other person or system that interacts with the system under test in a specific way.actual resultSynonyms: actual outcomeThe behavior produced/observed when a component or system is tested.ad hoc testingTesting carried out informally. No formal test preparation takes place, no recognized test design1

technique is used, there are no expectations for results and arbitrariness guides the testexecution activity.adaptabilityRef: ISO 9126See Also: portabilityThe capability of the software product to be adapted for different specified environments withoutapplying actions or means other than those provided for this purpose for the software considered.Agile ManifestoA statement on the values that underpin Agile software development. The values are: individualsand interactions over processes and tools, responding to change over following a plan, customercollaboration over contract negotiation, working software over comprehensive documentation.Agile software developmentA group of software development methodologies based on iterative incremental development,where requirements and solutions evolve through collaboration between self-organizing crossfunctional teams.Agile testingSee Also: test-driven developmentTesting practice for a project using Agile software development methodologies, incorporatingtechniques and methods, such as extreme programming (XP), treating development as thecustomer of testing and emphasizing the test-first design paradigm.alpha testingSimulated or actual operational testing by potential users/customers or an independent test teamat the developers' site, but outside the development organization. Alpha testing is oftenemployed for off-the-shelf software as a form of internal acceptance testing.analytical test strategyA test strategy whereby the test team analyzes the test basis to identify the test conditions tocover.analytical testingTesting based on a systematic analysis of e.g., product risks or requirements.analyzabilityRef: ISO 9126See Also: maintainabilityThe capability of the software product to be diagnosed for deficiencies or causes of failures in thesoftware, or for the parts to be modified to be identified.2

anomalyRef: IEEE 1044See Also: defect, error, fault, failure, incident, problemAny condition that deviates from expectation based on requirements specifications, designdocuments, user documents, standards, etc., or from someone's perception or experience.Anomalies may be found during, but not limited to, reviewing, testing, analysis, compilation, oruse of software products or applicable documentation.anti-patternRepeated action, process, structure or reusable solution that initially appears to be beneficial andis commonly used but is ineffective and/or counterproductive in practice.APIAcronym for Application Programming Interface.API testingTesting performed by submitting commands to the software under test using programminginterfaces of the application directly.assessment reportSee Also: process assessmentA document summarizing the assessment results, e.g., conclusions, recommendations andfindings.assessorA person who conducts an assessment. Any member of an assessment team.atomic conditionA condition that cannot be decomposed, i.e., a condition that does not contain two or more singleconditions joined by a logical operator (AND, OR, XOR).attack-based testingSee Also: attackAn experience-based testing technique that uses software attacks to induce failures, particularlysecurity related failures.attractivenessRef: ISO 9126See Also: usabilityThe capability of the software product to be attractive to the user.3

auditRef: IEEE 1028An independent evaluation of software products or processes to ascertain compliance tostandards, guidelines, specifications, and/or procedures based on objective criteria, includingdocuments that specify: (1) the form or content of the products to be produced, (2) the processby which the products shall be produced, (3) how compliance to standards or guidelines shall bemeasured.audit trailRef: After TMapA path by which the original input to a process (e.g., data) can be traced back through theprocess, taking the process output as a starting point. This facilitates defect analysis and allows aprocess audit to be carried out.automated testwareTestware used in automated testing, such as tool scripts.automation code defect densitySee Also: defect densityDefect density of a component of the test automation code.availabilityRef: IEEE 610The degree to which a component or system is operational and accessible when required for use.Often expressed as a percentage.balanced scorecardSee Also: corporate dashboard, scorecardA strategic tool for measuring whether the operational activities of a company are aligned with itsobjectives in terms of business vision and strategy.baselineRef: After IEEE 610A specification or software product that has been formally reviewed or agreed upon, thatthereafter serves as the basis for further development, and that can be changed only through aformal change control process.basic blockA sequence of one or more consecutive executable statements containing no branches. Note: Anode in a control flow graph represents a basic block.4

basis test setA set of test cases derived from the internal structure of a component or specification to ensurethat 100% of a specified coverage criterion will be achieved.behaviorThe response of a component or system to a set of input values and preconditions.benchmark testRef: After IEEE 610(1) A standard against which measurements or comparisons can be made. (2) A test that is usedto compare components or systems to each other or to a standard as in (1).best practiceA superior method or innovative practice that contributes to the improved performance of anorganization under given context, usually recognized as "best" by other peer organizations.beta testingSynonyms: field testingOperational testing by potential and/or existing users/customers at an external site not otherwiseinvolved with the developers, to determine whether or not a component or system satisfies theuser/customer needs and fits within the business processes. Beta testing is often employed as aform of external acceptance testing for off-the-shelf software in order to acquire feedback fromthe market.big-bang testingRef: After IEEE 610See Also: integration testingAn integration testing approach in which software elements, hardware elements, or both arecombined all at once into a component or an overall system, rather than in stages.black-box test design techniqueSynonyms: black-box technique, specification-based technique, specification-based test design techniqueProcedure to derive and/or select test cases based on an analysis of the specification, eitherfunctional or non-functional, of a component or system without reference to its internal structure.black-box testingSynonyms: specification-based testingTesting, either functional or non-functional, without reference to the internal structure of thecomponent or system.blocked test caseA test case that cannot be executed because the preconditions for its execution are not fulfilled.5

bottom-up testingSee Also: integration testingAn incremental approach to integration testing where the lowest level components are testedfirst, and then used to facilitate the testing of higher level components. This process is repeateduntil the component at the top of the hierarchy is tested.boundary valueAn input value or output value which is on the edge of an equivalence partition or at the smallestincremental distance on either side of an edge, for example the minimum or maximum value of arange.boundary value analysisSee Also: boundary valueA black-box test design technique in which test cases are designed based on boundary values.boundary value coverageThe percentage of boundary values that have been exercised by a test suite.branchA basic block that can be selected for execution based on a program construct in which one oftwo or more alternative program paths is available, e.g., case, jump, go to, if-then-else.branch coverageThe percentage of branches that have been exercised by a test suite. 100% branch coverageimplies both 100% decision coverage and 100% statement coverage.branch testingA white-box test design technique in which test cases are designed to execute branches.bufferRef: IEEE 610A device or storage area used to store data temporarily for differences in rates of data flow, timeor occurrence of events, or amounts of data that can be handled by the devices or processesinvolved in the transfer or use of the data.buffer overflowSee Also: bufferA memory access failure due to the attempt by a process to store data beyond the boundaries ofa fixed length buffer, resulting in overwriting of adjacent memory areas or the raising of anoverflow exception.6

build verification test (BVT)See Also: regression testing, smoke testA set of automated tests which validates the integrity of each new build and verifies its key/corefunctionality, stability and testability. It is an industry practice when a high frequency of buildreleases occurs (e.g., Agile projects) and it is run on every new build before the build is releasedfor further testing.burndown chartA publicly displayed chart that depicts the outstanding effort versus time in an iteration. It showsthe status and trend of completing the tasks of the iteration. The X-axis typically represents daysin the sprint, while the Y-axis is the remaining effort (usually either in ideal engineering hours orstory points).business process-based testingAn approach to testing in which test cases are designed based on descriptions and/or knowledgeof business processes.call graphAn abstract representation of calling relationships between subroutines in a program.Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)Ref: CMMIA framework that describes the key elements of an effective product development andmaintenance process. The Capability Maturity Model Integration covers best-practices forplanning, engineering and managing product development and maintenance.capture/playbackA test automation approach, where inputs to the test object are recorded during manual testingin order to generate automated test scripts that could be executed later (i.e. replayed).capture/playback toolSynonyms: capture/replay tool, record/playback toolA type of test execution tool where inputs are recorded during manual testing in order togenerate automated test scripts that can be executed later (i.e. replayed). These tools are oftenused to support automated regression testing.CASEAcronym for Computer Aided Software Engineering.7

CASTSee Also: test automationAcronym for Computer Aided Software Testing.causal analysisRef: CMMIThe analysis of defects to determine their root cause.cause-effect diagramRef: After JuranSynonyms: fishbone diagram, Ishikawa diagramA graphical representation used to organize and display the interrelationships of various possibleroot causes of a problem. Possible causes of a real or potential defect or failure are organized incategories and subcategories in a horizontal tree-structure, with the (potential) defect or failureas the root node.cause-effect graphA graphical representation of inputs and/or stimuli (causes) with their associated outputs(effects), which can be used to design test cases.cause-effect graphingRef: BS 7925/2Synonyms: cause-effect analysisA black-box test design technique in which test cases are designed from cause-effect graphs.certificationThe process of confirming that a component, system or person complies with its specifiedrequirements, e.g., by passing an exam.change managementSee Also: configuration management(1) A structured approach to transitioning individuals and organizations from a current state to adesired future state. (2) Controlled way to effect a change, or a proposed change, to a product orservice.changeabilityRef: ISO 9126See Also: maintainabilityThe capability of the software product to enable specified modifications to be implemented.checklist-based testingAn experience-based test design technique whereby the experienced tester uses a high-level listof items to be noted, checked, or remembered, or a set of rules or criteria against which a8

product has to be verified.classification treeSee Also: classification tree methodA tree showing equivalence partitions hierarchically ordered, which is used to design test cases inthe classification tree method.classification tree methodRef: GrochtmannSee Also: combinatorial testingA black-box test design technique in which test cases, described by means of a classification tree,are designed to execute combinations of representatives of input and/or output domains.CLIAcronym for Command-Line Interface.CLI testingTesting performed by submitting commands to the software under test using a dedicatedcommand-line interface.co-existenceRef: ISO 9126See Also: portabilityThe capability of the software product to co-exist with other independent software in a commonenvironment sharing common resources.codeRef: IEEE 610Computer instructions and data definitions expressed in a programming language or in a formoutput by an assembler, compiler or other translator.code coverageAn analysis method that determines which parts of the software have been executed (covered)by the test suite and which parts have not been executed, e.g., statement coverage, decisioncoverage or condition coverage.codependent behaviorExcessive emotional or psychological dependence on another person, specifically in trying tochange that person's current (undesirable) behavior while supporting them in continuing thatbehavior. For example, in software testing, complaining about late delivery to test and yetenjoying the necessary "heroism", working additional hours to make up time when delivery isrunning late, therefore reinforcing the lateness.9

combinatorial testingSee Also: classification tree method, n-wise testing, pairwise testing, orthogonal array testingA black-box test design technique in which test cases are designed to execute specificcombinations of values of several parameters.commercial off-the-shelf (COTS)Synonyms: off-the-shelf softwareA software product that is developed for the general market, i.e. for a large number of customers,and that is delivered to many customers in identical format.compilerRef: IEEE 610A software tool that translates programs expressed in a high-order language into their machinelanguage equivalents.complexitySee Also: cyclomatic complexityThe degree to which a component or system has a design and/or internal structure that is difficultto understand, maintain and verify.complianceRef: ISO 9126The capability of the software product to adhere to standards, conventions or regulations in lawsand similar prescriptions.compliance testingSynonyms: conformance testing, regulation testing, standards testingTesting to determine the compliance of the component or system.componentSynonyms: module, unitA minimal software item that can be tested in isolation.component integration testingSynonyms: link testingTesting performed to expose defects in the interfaces and interaction between integratedcomponents.component specificationA description of a component's function in terms of its output values for specified input values10

under specified conditions, and required non-functional behavior (e.g., resource-utilization).component testingRef: After IEEE 610Synonyms: module testing, program testing, unit testingThe testing of individual software components.compound conditionSynonyms: multiple conditionTwo or more single conditions joined by means of a logical operator (AND, OR or XOR), e.g., A BAND C 1000.concurrency testingRef: After IEEE 610Testing to determine how the occurrence of two or more activities within the same interval oftime, achieved either by interleaving the activities or by simultaneous execution, is handled bythe component or system.conditionSee Also: condition testingSynonyms: branch conditionA logical expression that can be evaluated as True or False, e.g., A B.condition coverageSynonyms: branch condition coverageThe percentage of condition outcomes that have been exercised by a test suite. 100% conditioncoverage requires each single condition in every decision statement to be tested as True andFalse.condition outcomeThe evaluation of a condition to True or False.condition testingA white-box test design technique in which test cases are designed to execute conditionoutcomes.confidence intervalIn managing project risks, the period of time within which a contingency action must beimplemented in order to be effective in reducing the impact of the risk.11

configurationThe composition of a component or system as defined by the number, nature, andinterconnections of its constituent parts.configuration auditingRef: IEEE 610The function to check on the contents of libraries of configuration items, e.g., for standardscompliance.configuration controlRef: IEEE 610Synonyms: change control, version controlAn element of configuration management, consisting of the evaluation, coordination, approval ordisapproval, and implementation of changes to configuration items after formal establishment oftheir configuration identification.configuration control board (CCB)Ref: IEEE 610Synonyms: change control boardA grou

[ISO 2382/1] ISO/IEC 2382-1:1993. Data processing - Vocabulary - Part 1: Fundamental terms [ISO 8402] ISO 8402: 1994. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Vocabulary [ISO 9000] ISO 9000:2005. Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary [ISO 9126] ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001.

Related Documents:

ITIL Glossary of Terms, Definitions and Acronyms in Hungarian, V3.1.24.h2.5, 24 February 2008, prepared by itSMF Hungary 1 ITIL V3 Hungarian Glossary Notes: 1. This ITIL V3 Hungarian Glossary (internal version: 2.5) is the itSMF Hungary's official translation of ITIL V3 Glossary of Terms, Definitions and Acronyms (version 3.1.24). 2. The Hungarian ITIL Terms have a relatively long .

IEEE Std 729-1983, IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology (ANSI) L3I.l It increases the number of terms from approximately 500 to 1300, and updates or refines the definitions of many terms included in the initial glossary. A few terms that were included in the initial glossary have

Mathematics — Glossary Page 1 – 2014–15 NYSAA Frameworks Glossary – Mathematics Mathematics Glossary A Mathematics Toolkit, i

This Glossary represents an initial step in a process of harmonising health and wellness terms within the consumer goods industry. The Glossary is intended to complement existing definitions. The success of the glossary is dependent on individuals and companies using the terms and definit

version of the PPRI Glossary was drafted, revised after a consultation process with the PPRI network and published in 2006. Since terminology is constantly changing, the authors of the PPRI glossary invited experts and the public to provide feed-back on the glossary, make suggestions for changes and propose new terms.

read in English (that is, limited English proficient or LEP persons ).2 Spanish is the most common non -English language spoken at home in the U.S .3 The Bureau created a glossary translating common financial terms into Spanish in October 2015 and has updated it in 2018 with additional terms. Terms for the updated glossary have been

area of the APM web, apm.org.uk/members, where you can access full pdf copies. Glossary terms This glossary is made up of terms used in the fifth, sixth and seventh editions of the APM Body of Knowledge, plus other APM publications. Definitions are provided where terms used are unique to the profession, or have a unique meaning in the profession.

Page 1 - Appendix E FASAB Handbook, Version 19 (06/20) Appendix E: Consolidated Glossary This glossary is a compilation of all terms presented in Statements of Federal Financial Accounting Standards. Some terms are designated as “Special Term from SFFAS #” and are terms defined specifically for the standard indicated.