UFC 4-025-01 Security Engineering: Waterfront Security

UFC 4-025-011 November 2012UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)SECURITY ENGINEERING:WATERFRONT SECURITYAPPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

UFC 4-025-011 November 2012UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)SECURITY ENGINEERING: WATERFRONT SECURITYAny copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use.Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of thecopyright holder.U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERSNAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity)AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTERRecord of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ . /1/)Change No.DateLocation

UFC 4-025-011 November 2012FOREWORDThe Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and providesplanning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and appliesto the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordancewith USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects andwork for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States isalso governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded ConstructionAgreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.)Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, theSOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable.UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available tousers as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for militaryconstruction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval FacilitiesEngineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) areresponsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact thepreparing service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC isthe responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supportingrationale should be sent to the respective service proponent office by the following electronicform: Criteria Change Request. The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed below.UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the followingsource: Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/.Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the currentelectronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current.JAMES C. DALTON, P.E.JOSEPH E. GOTT, P.E.Chief, Engineering and ConstructionU.S. Army Corps of EngineersChief EngineerNaval Facilities Engineering CommandSCOTT HARTFORD, Col, USAF, P.E.Acting DirectorMICHAEL McANDREWFacilities Engineering Center of ExcellenceAir Force Civil Engineer CenterOffice of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense(Installations and Environment)Director, Facilities Investment and Management

UFC 4-025-011 November 2012UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)NEW DOCUMENT SUMMARY SHEETDocument: UFC 4-025-01 Security Engineering: Waterfront SecuritySuperseding: NoneDescription: Provide a unified approach to the development of waterfront protectivemeasures intended to protect waterside assets.Reasons for Document: This document is one of a series of security engineering criteria documentscovering physical countermeasures for the current threat environment. The design of physical security measures is a specialized technical area thatdoes not fall in the normal skill record and resume of commanders, architects,engineers, and project managers. This document provides guidance to thoseparties tasked with implementing existing and emerging physical protectionsystem requirements for waterside assets.Impact: This document does not set the requirement for protection measures for thewaterfront. No additional cost impacts are anticipated by the publication of thisdocument. This document should reduce the design and coordination efforts forwaterfront design.Unification IssuesThere are no unification issues.

UFC 4-025-011 November 2012TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION . 11-1BACKGROUND. . 11-2PURPOSE. . 11-3APPLICABILITY. . 11-4SCOPE. . 11-5VULNERABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT. . 11-6POLICY REQUIREMENTS. 21-6.1Department of Defense. . 21-6.2Geographic Combatant Commander (GCC) Requirements. 21-6.3Service Requirements. . 31-6.4Installation Specific Requirements. . 31-7CONSIDERATIONS. . 31-7.1Security. . 31-7.2Port Operations. 41-7.3Safety. 41-7.4Appearance. . 41-7.5Environmental Impact. . 41-8CORROSION PREVENTION AND CONTROL. . 41-9REFERENCES. . 41-10GLOSSARY. . 41-11GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. . 41-12SECURITY ENGINEERING UFC SERIES. . 51-12.1DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings. . 51-12.2DoD Security Engineering Facilities Planning Manual. . 51-12.3DoD Security Engineering Facilities Design Manual. . 51-12.4Security Engineering Support Manuals. . 61-12.5Security Engineering UFC Application. . 6CHAPTER 2 OVERVIEW. 92-1OVERVIEW. . 92-2WATERFRONT SECURITY SYSTEM. 92-2.1Waterfront Assets. . 92-2.2Waterfront. . 9i

UFC 4-025-011 November 20122-2.32-3Physical Security System. 10PLANNING. . 122-3.1Establish Requirements. . 122-3.2Design Basis Threat (DBT). . 122-3.3Level of Protection (LOP). 122-3.4Future Development Plans. . 132-3.5Document Requirements. . 13CHAPTER 3 DESIGN STRATEGY . 153-1INTRODUCTION. . 153-2DESIGN STRATEGY. 153-2.1Detect, Delay, and Respond. . 163-3SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS. 173-4ESTABLISH PERIMETER. 173-4.1Landside Perimeter. . 183-4.2Waterside Perimeter. . 183-5SECURITY LIGHTING. 183-6SIGNAGE. . 183-6.1Access Control Point (ACP) Signage. . 183-6.2Restricted area signage. . 193-6.3Boat Barrier Signage. . 19CHAPTER 4 LANDSIDE. 214-1INTRODUCTION. . 214-2GENERAL DESIGN STRATEGY. . 214-3LANDSIDE ACCESS CONTROL. . 224-4LANDSIDE STANDOFF. . 244-5ACCESS CONTROL LAYER I: INSTALLATION PERIMETER. . 244-6ACCESS CONTROL LAYER II: WATERFRONT ENCLAVE. . 244-6.1Layer II: Vehicle ACPs. . 244-6.2Layer II: Pedestrian ACPs. 244-6.3Layer II: Fence. . 254-6.4Layer II: Vehicle Barriers. 254-74-7.1ACP LAYER III: FOOT OF PIER. . 25Layer III: Vehicle Barriers. 25ii

UFC 4-025-011 November 20124-7.2Layer III: Guard Booth. . 264-8ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEMS (ESS). . 264-9SECURITY LIGHTING. 274-9.1Perimeter Lighting. . 274-9.2Vehicle ACP Lighting. . 274-9.3Pedestrian ACP Lighting. . 27CHAPTER 5 WATERSIDE . 295-1INTRODUCTION. . 295-2DESIGN STRATEGY. 295-2.1General Design Strategy. 295-3WATERSIDE STANDOFF. . 305-4PERIMETER. . 305-4.1Waterside Perimeter. . 305-4.2Waterside Restricted Area. . 315-4.3Line of demarcation (LOD). 315-4.4Boat Barrier System. . 315-5GUARD TOWERS. . 325-5.1Communication and Information Technology. 335-5.2Central Duress Alarm. . 335-5.3Guard Tower Lighting. . 335-6WATERFRONT SECURITY LIGHTING. . 345-6.1Water surface Lighting. . 345-6.2Underwater Lighting. . 345-6.3Under deck Lighting. . 345-6.4Lighting Interference. . 345-7ELECTRONIC HARBOR SECURITY SYSTEMS (EHSS). 355-7.1Surface Detection and Assessment. . 355-7.2Subsurface Detection and Assessment. . 385-7.3Command, Control, Communication and Display (C3D). . 385-7.4Infrastructure. 39APPENDIX A REFERENCES . 43APPENDIX B GLOSSARY . 45iii

UFC 4-025-011 November 2012FIGURESFigure 1-1 Security Engineering UFC Application . 7Figure 2-1 Waterfront . 10Figure 2-2 Diagram of Physical Security System Functions . 11Figure 2-3 Project Process . 13Figure 3-1 Zone Concept . 16Figure 3-2 ACP Sign Example . 19Figure 3-3 Restricted Area Sign Example . 19Figure 4-1 Landside Security Zones Adjacent to Piers. 22Figure 4-2 Landside Access Control Transitions . 23Figure 4-3 Waterfront Access Control . 23Figure 4-4 Pier ACP . 25Figure 5-1 Waterside Security Zones . 30Figure 5-1 Floating Line of Demarcation . 32Figure 5-2 Boat Barrier System (Port Security Barrier) . 32Figure 5-3 Guard Tower on Pier . 34Figure 5-4 Radar Antenna . 36Figure 5-5 Sound Transducer Being Lowered into the Water . 38Figure 5-6 Roof Mounted Equipment . 40Figure 5-7 EHSS Configuration . 41TABLESTable 2-1 Waterfront Security Elements. 11Table 5-2 Visual-Imaging Element Technologies . 37iv

UFC 4-025-011 November 2012CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION1-1BACKGROUND.Terrorist attacks on waterside assets such as the USS Cole emphasize the need forincreased antiterrorism (AT) and physical security protective measures for waterfrontassets.1-2PURPOSE.Present a unified approach for AT and physical security systems that protect waterfrontassets. Commanders, security personnel, planners, designers, architects, andengineers shall use this document when considering AT and physical security systemsthat protect waterfront assets.1-3APPLICABILITY.This document provides planning and design criteria for DoD components andparticipating organizations. This document applies to all construction, renovation, andrepair projects including expeditionary or temporary construction of waterfront facilitiesassociated with waterfront assets onboard DoD installations. This document does notapply to ports of call.1-4SCOPE.This document provides a methodology to design AT and physical security systemsrequired to protect waterfront assets. It focuses on the protection of military warshipsand support vessels but the concepts within may be adopted for the protection of allDoD waterfront assets such as airfields, shore facilities, or other structures immediatelyadjacent to water.The examples provided are for illustration only and should be modified and adapted tosatisfy installation specific constraints. Issues such as tactics, techniques, andoperational procedures are not addressed. However, a well-designed physical securitysystem should not hinder operations and capabilities.1-5VULNERABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT.In accordance with DOD O-2000.12H Antiterrorism handbook, a vulnerability and riskassessment must be conducted prior to beginning any security project. Upon identifyingfacility or asset vulnerabilities to threats, physical security measures such as fences,gates, and Electronic Security Systems (ESS) may be deployed to reducevulnerabilities. In summary, this document assumes the pre-design phases, includingthe risk analysis, are complete prior to beginning design. For information on SecurityEngineering Planning and Design process, refer to UFC 4-020-01 and UFC 4-020-02(described in the section “Security Engineering UFC Series” in this chapter). Theengineering risk analysis conducted as part of UFC 4-020-01 should be consistent withthe terrorism risk analysis conducted by the installation security/AT staff.1

UFC 4-025-011 November 20121-6POLICY REQUIREMENTS.The requirement to protect waterfront assets comes from DoD Instruction/Directives,Geographic Combatant Commander (GCC) Instructions, Service Instruction/Directives,and Regional or Installation requirements. Consult Headquarters, Major Command,Regional, and Installation personnel to established waterfront asset protectionrequirements.1-6.1Department of Defense.There are several instructions and publications within the Department of Defense thatestablish requirements for access control and physical security for waterfront assets. DOD 5200.8-R: Requires DOD Components to determine the necessary accesscontrol based on the requirements of a developed physical security program.Emergency planning is specified to include establishment of a system for positiveidentification of personnel and equipment authorized to enter and exit theinstallation and maintenance of adequate physical barriers that will be deployedto control access to the installation. Planning will also include increasingvigilance and access restrictions during higher force protection conditions. DODD 2000.12: Provides DOD policies for ATFP and assigns responsibilities forimplementing the procedures for the DOD ATFP

the risk analysis, are complete prior to beginning design. For information on Security Engineering Planning and Design process, refer to UFC 4-020-01 and UFC 4-020-02 (described in the section “Security Engineering UFC Series” in this chapter). The engineering risk analysis conducted as part of UFC 4-020-01 should be consistent with