WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS - Cte.careertech

1y ago
10 Views
2 Downloads
1.20 MB
67 Pages
Last View : 18d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jerry Bolanos
Transcription

WITH LEARNERS,NOT FOR LEARNERS:A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATINGLEARNER VOICE IN CTE

WITH LEARNERS,NOT FOR LEARNERS:A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATINGLEARNER VOICE IN CTEABOUTThis toolkit will provide state and local Career Technical Education (CTE) leaders with actionableresources, guidance and tools to help them develop and engage learners for the improvementof CTE policies and practices.The toolkit and its resources will focus on opportunities and strategies for engaging current CTE learners, includinglearners in middle and high school CTE programs as well as adult learners in postsecondary CTE programs, in thedevelopment, assessment and improvement of CTE programs, practices and policies. While engaging the voicesof prospective CTE learners, engaging learners for more general relationship-building purposes, and learnerengagement and student choice in the classroom are critically important topics, this toolkit will not focus on them.However, several of the principles, ideas and resources shared in this publication could also benefit these efforts.WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE

CONTENTSThe Importance of Learner Voice in CTEWhat is Learner Voice?1Why is Learner Voice Important?2What Can We Learn From CTE Learners?5Commitments for Engaging CTE Learners6Actions for Elevating CTE Learner VoiceAssess Organizational Readiness8Explore Methods for Learner Engagement11Harness CTE-Specific Engagement Opportunities and Levers16Ensure Equitable CTE Learner Engagement20Expand Capacity for CTE Learner Engagement25Supplemental ToolsWORKSHEET: Reflections on Elevating Learner Voice in CTE28RUBRIC: Assessing Your Commitments for Engaging CTE Learners35WORKSHEET: Assessing Organizational Readiness to Elevate Learner Voice in CTE43SAMPLE QUESTIONS: Focus Groups for Current CTE Learners45ACTION PLAN: Developing a Strategy to Elevate Learner Voice in CTE50Acknowledgments58Appendix: Annotated Bibliography59Endnotes63Click this icon to get back to the Contents pageWITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE

THE IMPORTANCEOF LEARNERVOICE IN CTEWHAT IS LEARNER VOICE?CTE programs must be designed with learners, not simply for learners, to be responsive to their diverseneeds at every stage of the CTE continuum. Being responsive to diverse learner needs can occur only iflearners have direct and ongoing input into the design and delivery of CTE programs and experiences.Learner voice is often neglected even though learnerslearner needs, break down barriers — particularly forthemselves are affected directly by decisions made abouthistorically marginalized populations — and improveCTE programs and have invaluable first-hand experiences.quality. Engaging learners in a meaningful way in CTEIt is therefore critical that learners be engaged as keyprogram design and delivery can also increase learners’stakeholders in the decision making process within CTEengagement in their education and sense of agency overprograms. By empowering learners to share feedbacktheir own lives, while developing their communicationregarding their CTE experiences through intentional andand collaboration skills.ongoing feedback loops, CTE programs can better addressLEARNER VOICE AND LEARNER ENGAGEMENT have been defined in numerous ways:“[A]uthentic student input or leadership in instruction,school structures, or education policies that can promotemeaningful change in education systems, practice, and/orpolicy by empowering students as change agents,often working in partnership with adult educators.” 1“[G]iving students the ability to influence learning toinclude policies, programs, contexts and principles.” 2co-constructing the teaching/learning dynamic. It canalso be understood as self-determined goal-setting orsimply as agency.” 3“[C]an range from the most basic level of youth sharingtheir opinions of problems and potential solutions, toallowing young people to collaborate with adults toaddress the problems in their schools, to youth takingthe lead on seeking change.”4“[A] broad term describing a range of activities thatcan occur in and out of school. It can be understoodas expression, performance, and creativity and asWITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE1

LEARNER VOICE can best be conceptualized as occurring on a spectrum from learners givingtheir feedback and opinions to learners taking on leadership roles and driving systemic change.TYPES OF STUDENT VOICECollaboration with adultsBeing PVolunteeringopinions; studentcontributionsacknowledgedby adultsSharingfeedback andopinions infocus groupor surveyParticipatingin zedrole ems andsolutions,advocatingfor changeLEADERSHIPCo-planning,co-executing andhaving sharedresponsibility foroutcomesAdapted version of Toshalis and Nakkula’s “The Spectrum of Student Voice Oriented Activity” and Mitra and Gross’ “Pyramid of student voice” as published inElevating Student Voice in Education by Meg Benner, Catherine Brown and Ashley Jeffrey.Sources: This graph is adapted from Eric Toshalis and Michael J. Nakkula, “Motivation, Engagement, and Student Voice” (Boston: Jobs for the Future,2012), Dana L. Mitra and Steven Jay Gross, “Increasing Student Voice in High School Reform: Building Partnerships, Improving Outcomes,” EducationalManagement Administration & Leadership 37 (4) (2009): 522-543.Each level of learner engagement has its opportunities and limitations.5 For instance, a broad set of learners can be engagedon the expressive end of the spectrum through such methods as surveys, but that engagement may be more surface leveland less authentic. On the other end of the spectrum, learners in leadership roles can foster systemic change, but this level ofengagement requires a small group of learners investing a great deal of time and energy.WHY IS LEARNER VOICE IMPORTANT?Without Limits: A Shared Vision for the Future of Career Technical Education, developed by Advance CTEand supported by the Association for Career and Technical Education and another 40-plus nationalorganizations, puts forth a bold vision for a cohesive, flexible and responsive career preparationecosystem.6 The second principle in CTE Without Limits focuses specifically on ensuring that eachlearner feels welcome in, is supported by and has the means to succeed in the career preparationecosystem. This principle calls on states and institutions to leverage existing and design newopportunities to engage learners, families and key community partners to share their uniqueexperiences with the CTE system to inform and improve upon programs and supports.CTE learners are the most important stakeholders in any CTEfrom an enthusiastic majority of elementary school learnersprogram. They are the experts in their own education andto only one-third of high school learners self-reporting thatcareer pathways, and they are the ones who must live withthey are engaged in learning.7the impacts of decisions that are all too frequently madewithout their input.This failure to engage learners is holistic, spanning classroompractices; a welcoming campus environment; and decisionsThe consequences of the education system’s failure to elevateabout the policies, programs and services available tolearner voice are particularly apparent when looking at thesupport learners. For example, only 42 percent of statesaccess and performance gaps for special and historicallyreport having clear feedback loops in place to gathermarginalized populations, both within CTE and in educationongoing input about their CTE systems and programs frommore generally. In addition, research has documented thatlearners, families and community members.8 This situationstudents’ engagement in their education declines over time,must change for CTE to truly reflect learners’ needs.WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE2

Equity and InclusionOne of the most important reasons to elevate learner voiceAs part of the work to elevate learner voice, leaders andis so that policymakers and practitioners can hear fromeducators must reckon with CTE’s history and currentlearners about their varying challenges, needs and priorities,inequities. This reckoning includes CTE’s history as anparticularly learners who encounter the most barriers toalternative education option for learners who wereaccess and success in high-quality CTE programs and relatedconsidered non-college bound and “tracking” of learnersexperiences such as work-based learning. These learnersfrom low-income families, learners of color, learnersinclude those with special population status (as furtherwith disabilities, female learners and other historicallydescribed below), historically marginalized populations, andmarginalized populations into terminal vocational programslearners in rural and urban areas that may lack access to athat denied their full potential and left them with limitedbreadth of high-quality CTE experiences.opportunity. As a result, inequities still exist for learners fromEngaging CTE learners across different populations is alsoa moral imperative, recognizing the serious, often lifelongimpact that education programs and policies have onlearners. The consequences of decisions made by educationleaders and policymakers about policies, programs andpractices often fall inequitably on different learner groups,maintaining power structures and reproducing inequities.these populations in accessing high-quality CTE programs.Seeking out the voices of learners from these populations isan important step for CTE leaders to take to ensure that theCTE programs of today are helping these populations reachtheir full potential, removing barriers to access and success,providing critical supports and services, and not furtherperpetuating historical inequities.9Perkins VIn addition to the equity imperative, stakeholderengagement is a major theme and required componentof the Strengthening Career and Technical Education forStates and local leaders must provide disaggregateddata about and engage with and enhance their effortsto serve the following special populations:the 21st Century Act (Perkins V). The law requires statesto develop four-year state plans in consultation with Individuals with disabilities I ndividuals from economically disadvantaged families,including low-income youth and adults Individuals preparing for non-traditional fields Single parents, including single pregnant womenstudents and community organizations. School districts Out-of-workforce individualsand colleges must engage a similar list of stakeholders — English learnersincluding learners — for the Comprehensive Local Needs Individuals experiencing homelessnessAssessment (CLNA) that occurs, in most states, every two outh who are in, or have aged out of,Ythe foster care system outh with a parent who is a member of theYarmed forces and is on active dutyrepresentatives of secondary and postsecondary CTEprograms such as teachers, instructors and counselors; stateworkforce development board representatives; business andindustry representatives; and members and representativesof special population groups as well as families/caregivers,years and must also consult these stakeholders on anongoing basis. Aligned with this focus on stakeholder inputis an expanded list of special populations.WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE3

State agencies and local CTE programs also are required toand local CTE leaders are investing in better serving groupsprovide disaggregated data by gender, race/ethnicity andthat have been historically marginalized because of their— at the secondary level — migrant status. Once the datagender, race or ethnicity as well as Tribal learners, justice-is disaggregated, provisions throughout the law require aninvolved individuals, LGBTQ learners and undocumented orexamination of gaps among learner groups on measures ofmigrant students.access and performance. To address these gaps, many stateLearner and Organizational OutcomesWith most learner engagement efforts in their infancy, both in CTE and throughout education more generally, the research baseon outcomes from learner engagement and voice activities is small but growing. The emerging research points to benefits forlearners and organizations seeking to improve service delivery:More agency — choice, control and collaborativeopportunities — has been linked to better outcomes forhistorically marginalized populations as well as greaterclassroom participation and fewer behavioral problems.10Young people who participate in research and evaluationin their classrooms and communities gain confidence;social capital; social and civic competencies; and research,critical thinking and problem-solving skills.12Student voices opportunities lead to increased agency,belonging and competence in learners.11Involving youth in decisionmaking helps organizationscreate optimal learning environments for all, contributingsubstantially to improved services, more service utilizationand improved youth-adult interactions.13AS MORE EDUCATION SYSTEMS AND LEARNER-SERVING ORGANIZATIONS ELEVATELEARNER VOICE, the research will likely continue to show benefits for learners and stateand local education systems, including the development of higher quality and moreequitable CTE systems at the state and local levels.WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE4

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM CTE LEARNERS?We can learn many things from CTE learners that can improve program quality and equity and enhancelearners’ experiences in CTE programs by getting answers to questions such as: How did you learn about this CTE program? Why did you decide to enroll? How should we enhance our outreach efforts to reach more prospective CTE learners? What opportunities do you have to continue your learning in your CTE program? What has made you feel uncomfortable, marginalized or discriminated against in your CTE program? What has made you feel welcome, supported or valued in your CTE program? What aspect of your CTE education has helped you the most? What has felt like the largest stumbling block? In what ways does your CTE program feel connected or relevant to your long-term goals? Does the content you learn in your CTE program feel relevant to you personally? In what ways do you see yourself as a driver of your own career exploration and planning? What types of work-based learning have been or would be the most valuable to you? Which individuals or organizations do you turn to for career-related support? How has CTE positioned you for your future? If you could change one thing about your CTE program, what would it be? What supports or services would make participating and being successful in CTE easier for you? How could I, as an educator or administrator, improve your CTE experience?A FULL SET OF SAMPLE FOCUS GROUP QUESTIONS FOR LEARNERS CAN BE FOUND ON PAGE 45.REFLECTIONSUse the Reflections on Elevating Learner Voice in CTE Worksheet to capture any reflections taken fromThe Importance of Learner Voice in CTE section. How can engaging learners improve CTE programs and policies in your state, district or institution? How can engaging CTE learners help close equity gaps in your state, district or institution? What do you most want or need to learn from learners to improve CTE programs and policies?WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE5

COMMITMENTSFOR ENGAGINGCTE LEARNERSLearner engagement efforts should be grounded in a set of commitments for authentically, equitablyand sustainably elevating CTE learner voice. These commitments undergird the overall strategy and theactions CTE leaders take to develop and grow learner voice opportunities for CTE program, policy andpractice development and improvement.1. C TE LEARNERS ARE ENGAGED MEANINGFULLY.Learner engagement elevates CTE learner voice for the purpose of program improvement, not as a box-checking exercise.Learners contribute to state and local CTE development, assessment and improvement activities; to toolkits, professionaldevelopment and other resources for CTE programs and educators; and to new state and local CTE initiatives and studentsupport efforts.2. CTE LEARNERS ARE TREATED AS VALUED AND TRUSTED STAKEHOLDERS.Learner engagement is built on trust among participants and a recognition of the value of each voice around the table.Educators welcome the participation of CTE learners and are eager to learn from their knowledge and perspectives aboutCTE program quality, access and equity, while acknowledging that listening to honest input from learners may not alwaysfeel comfortable. Community agreements define the ground rules that support CTE learners to engage with each otherand with other stakeholders respectfully and encourage brave spaces in which participants can talk honestly and openly,without fear of retribution.3. ENGAGEMENT IS INCLUSIVE OF ALL CTE LEARNER VOICES.CTE leaders actively seek representation across the variety of CTE learners: learners with special population status; learnersfrom across different gender identities, sexual orientations, races and ethnicities, including students of color; other keylearner groups, such as justice-involved, migrant and undocumented individuals; learners from a variety of CTE programareas; learners from the secondary and postsecondary levels; and learners from different geographies, as appropriate.Leaders move beyond engaging a small set of the most committed learners, such as Career Technical Student Organization(CTSO) officers, to incorporate a diversity of CTE voices.4. CTE LEARNERS ARE PREPARED TO ENGAGE EFFECTIVELY THROUGH TRAINING,RESOURCES AND SUPPORTS.CTE learners are empowered to engage productively through preparation and supports. Empowering learners includesconveying clear expectations about roles and responsibilities; providing training on effective communication; andeliminating barriers such as scheduling, transportation, technology access and other challenges that can be differentiallyencountered by CTE learners from various populations, learner levels and geographies.WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE6

5. CTE LEARNERS HAVE MULTIPLE AVENUES FOR ENGAGEMENT.Learners can contribute their voices through a variety of venues and methods, from expressing their opinions infocus groups of CTE learners and CLNA meetings to participating on program advisory boards to organizing learnerfocused events. Engagement activities are conducted in person and virtually.6. CTE LEARNER ENGAGEMENT IS SUSTAINED THROUGH REGULAR,INSTITUTIONALIZED PROCESSES.Learner engagement is institutionalized through advisory board requirements, CLNA requirements and guidanceand other ongoing means to enable regular opportunities for elevating CTE learner voice. Institutionalizing thisengagement ensures that successive generations of CTE learners are engaged after individuals graduate or completeprograms. Metrics and feedback loops are also in place so learners, families, community partners, instructors and thepublic understand how learner contributions have been used and incorporated into policy or programmatic changes.7. CTE LEARNERS ARE RECOGNIZED FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS.CTE learners are recognized for investing their time and expertise in engagement activities. This recognition mayinclude having their names and contributions shared publicly as well as appropriate compensation, such as cashor gift card stipends, scholarships, academic credit, independent study opportunities, awards or other types ofcompensation. Compensation is determined in collaboration with learners.REFLECTIONSComplete the Assessing Your Commitments for Engaging CTE Learners Rubric.Use the Reflections on Elevating Learner Voice in CTE Worksheet to capture any reflections taken from theCommitments for Engaging CTE Learners section. Which of the seven commitments are already in place in your state, district or institution? Where do you most need to build capacity, skill or will to fully meet the commitments?WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE7

ACTIONS FORELEVATING CTELEARNER VOICETo develop and implement an effective strategy for engaging learners that fully meets thecommitments laid out in the previous section, CTE leaders can begin by taking actions to: Assess organizational readiness Explore methods for learner engagement Harness CTE-specific engagement opportunities and levers Ensure equitable CTE learner engagement Expand capacity for CTE learner engagementTHESE STEPS ARE NOT SEQUENTIAL BUT RATHER A SERIES OF ACTIONSthat will be revisited and refined as leaders develop and expand efforts to elevate learner voice.ASSESS ORGANIZATIONAL READINESSTo effectively engage learners in developing, assessing and improving CTE programs and policies,state and local CTE leaders should assess the culture at their agencies, districts or institutions and, ifnecessary, build a culture that values and supports engaging stakeholders, including learners andfamilies/caregivers, and is committed to elevating learner voice, even when this work is difficult oruncomfortable. An organizational culture that is dedicated to elevating learner voice will strive tomeet the commitments defined previously.Part of assessing organizational readiness is identifyingadministrators and even more so between learners andwhere relationships with learners already exist andstate leaders. Therefore, part of preparing to do this workinvesting in building relationships with learners whereincludes looking for ways to increase interaction betweenneeded. The closest relationships between learners andlearners and leaders and for opportunities to recruiteducators will likely be in the classroom, where instructorsclassroom instructors, current learners, alumni, and otherdirectly engage with CTE learners daily. Relationshipsstakeholders with experience in elevating learner voice toare likely to be more distant between learners and localsupport and facilitate engagement activities.WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE8

?To assess organizational readiness for this work, consider the following questions:1. W hat are your state’s, district’s or institution’sgoals for elevating CTE learner voice? What are theshort-, mid- and long-term objectives?2. H ow well do CTE leaders understand the benefitsof elevating CTE learner voice? How prepared isyour state, district, institution or community toreceive and act upon learner input, even when thedialogue is uncomfortable or feedback is negative?From whom do you have buy-in or need buy-in?3. W hat knowledge and skills do CTE leaders haveto effectively elevate CTE learner voice? Whatknowledge and skills do you need to develop?4. W hat capacity do CTE leaders have for elevatingCTE learner voice? Is there a position ordepartment in your agency, district or institutionwhere you could locate learner voice activities?What funding streams can you use to supportlearner voice activities?5. W hat existing activities can your state, district orinstitution leverage to elevate CTE learner voice?What existing policy or program development,review or improvement processes can youleverage?6. W hat relationships already exist with CTE learners?How can you build relationships? What educators,learners, alumni, and partners with a history ofeffective learner engagement can you tap to helpyou build relationships?7. W hat other stakeholders or partners can supportCTE leaders in this work? What other agencies,institutions or organizations can you turn to forassistance?State and local CTE leaders should not worry if they cannot answer these questions yet. This toolkit will help leadersconsider opportunities and capacity for building relationships and engaging CTE learners. Additional tools for reflectingon organizational readiness for this work include Being Y-AP Savvy: A Primer on Creating and Sustaining Youth-AdultPartnerships from the ACT for Youth Center of Excellence at Cornell University.14WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE9

The Qualities of an Agency Culture That Supports Stakeholder Engagement15Responsive and reciprocalInclusiveMeaningful engagement is atwo-way process betweenthe stakeholder and theagency. The agency valuesstakeholder contributions toimproving outcomes forchildren, youth, and families.The agency commits to seek outand facilitate the involvement of allwho are potentially interested oraffected by its work, includingthose that are harder to reach forreasons such as language, culture,age, or mobility.RespectfulThe agency values stakeholdersand uses their input to improvepolicy and outcomes. Child welfareleaders actively listen to andunderstand stakeholder needs.Impartial and objectiveAs part of meaningful engagement, the agency makes effortsto ensure information isaccessible and objective, andfacilitates engagementwith all stakeholders.Open, transparent, and trustingThe agency provides informationso stakeholders can participate inan informed way and fosters aculture of sharing ideas.REFLECTIONSComplete the Assessing Organizational Readiness to Elevate Learner Voice in CTE Worksheet.Use the Reflections on Elevating Learner Voice in CTE Worksheet to capture any reflections taken from theAssess Organizational Readiness section. What strengths within your state, district or institution support efforts to engage CTE learners aroundthe improvement of policies and programs? What gaps in your state, district or institution are most critical to address to build a strategy to elevateCTE learner voice?WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE10

EXPLORE METHODS FOR LEARNERENGAGEMENTLearners can use their voices in many ways across the spectrum of student voice described previouslyto affect the education system. These roles can range from providing input to serving as evaluators,researchers or advisers to being creators and leaders.This section will focus on methods and learner rolesWhatever methods are selected, multiple learners should bethat are the most pertinent to CTE program and policyengaged to ensure that diverse perspectives are heard. Thesedevelopment, assessment and improvement rather thanperspectives include secondary and postsecondary/adultlearner engagement in the classroom; prospective learnerCTE learners, learners from different special and historicallyengagement; or other methods and roles such as studentmarginalized populations, and learners from different partsgovernment, student journalism and student activism. Inof the state or different programs within an institution.general, the following methods can be used at both theOne or two learners cannot and should not be tasked withlocal and state levels, although some are more relevantrepresenting all CTE learner voices. More information onto a particular setting than others.equitably engaging learners can be found in other sectionsof this toolkit.METHOD:Social MediaLEARNER ROLE:Informal InputOne tool for seeking learner input is social media.While less rigorous than some research methods for gainingor challenges that ask learners to share their thoughts inlearner feedback, social media has the benefit of being awriting or video. However, it is important to remember thatplace where learners are already engaged among themselvesnot all learners have access to social media; participationin authentic conversations. CTE agencies, institutions andon different platforms varies, particularly by age; and not allprograms can use their social media networks to seeklearners may feel comfortable providing direct feedback ininformal learner input through polls, open-ended questions,such a public setting.WITH LEARNERS, NOT FOR LEARNERS: A TOOLKIT FOR ELEVATING LEARNER VOICE IN CTE11

METHOD:LEARNER ROLE:SurveysFormal inputCTE leaders can engage in more rigorous data collection and research opportunities with learners through surveys.Surveys are a well-known and widely used tool that canTo make surveys more impactful, learners and student voicequickly and easily gather reactions and feedback acrossexperts recommend minimizing jargon, being explicit anda broad swath of learner groups while protecting learnertransparent about the purpose of the survey, reportinganonymity. However, learners report that surveys can be fullfindings back to learners and other stakeholders, andof jargon they do not understand and frequently includeproviding additional opportunities to provide more in-depthresponse options that are not nuanced enough to captureinput. Further tips on survey design can be found at thewhat learners really think. In addition, learners are adeptUniversity of California-Berkeley (UC-Berkeley) YPAR Hub,at reading between the lines to identify the responses thatCollecting Student Voices for Guided Pathways Inquiry andeducators want to hear and will sometimes respond that way.Design from the California Community Colleges, and theSurveys are also fairly impersonal, and learners are not alwaysImproving CTE Programs with Data and Evidence Guideclear about how — and if — the information will be used,from The RP Group.16which can affect the motivation of learners to complete themfully and honestly.METHOD:Focus Groups/Discussion SessionsLEARNER ROLE:Formal Input, FacilitationLearners who contributed to this toolkit favor approaches that enable them to share their thoughts in a morenuanced, open dialogue through focus groups, discussion sessions and similar qualitative research methods.This strategy is also useful for engaging learners who mayincreasing access for learne

This toolkit will provide state and local Career Technical Education (CTE) leaders with actionable resources, guidance and tools to help them develop and engage learners for the improvement of CTE policies and practices. The toolkit and its resources will focus on opportunities and strategies for engaging current CTE learners, including

Related Documents:

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan

service i Norge och Finland drivs inom ramen för ett enskilt företag (NRK. 1 och Yleisradio), fin ns det i Sverige tre: Ett för tv (Sveriges Television , SVT ), ett för radio (Sveriges Radio , SR ) och ett för utbildnings program (Sveriges Utbildningsradio, UR, vilket till följd av sin begränsade storlek inte återfinns bland de 25 största

Hotell För hotell anges de tre klasserna A/B, C och D. Det betyder att den "normala" standarden C är acceptabel men att motiven för en högre standard är starka. Ljudklass C motsvarar de tidigare normkraven för hotell, ljudklass A/B motsvarar kraven för moderna hotell med hög standard och ljudklass D kan användas vid

LÄS NOGGRANT FÖLJANDE VILLKOR FÖR APPLE DEVELOPER PROGRAM LICENCE . Apple Developer Program License Agreement Syfte Du vill använda Apple-mjukvara (enligt definitionen nedan) för att utveckla en eller flera Applikationer (enligt definitionen nedan) för Apple-märkta produkter. . Applikationer som utvecklas för iOS-produkter, Apple .

This presentation and SAP's strategy and possible future developments are subject to change and may be changed by SAP at any time for any reason without notice. This document is 7 provided without a warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a .

och krav. Maskinerna skriver ut upp till fyra tum breda etiketter med direkt termoteknik och termotransferteknik och är lämpliga för en lång rad användningsområden på vertikala marknader. TD-seriens professionella etikettskrivare för . skrivbordet. Brothers nya avancerade 4-tums etikettskrivare för skrivbordet är effektiva och enkla att

Den kanadensiska språkvetaren Jim Cummins har visat i sin forskning från år 1979 att det kan ta 1 till 3 år för att lära sig ett vardagsspråk och mellan 5 till 7 år för att behärska ett akademiskt språk.4 Han införde två begrepp för att beskriva elevernas språkliga kompetens: BI