Community Development Block Grant Disaster Response Mitigation Programs
Community Development Block GrantDisaster ResponseMitigation ProgramsICARP MeetingAugust 19, 2021
Agenda Introductions Background CDBG - MIT Funding Sequence– Action Plan– Stakeholder Engagement– Program Funding Next Steps
California Department of Housing andCommunity Development Mission: Provides leadership, policies, and programs to preserve and expand safeand affordable housing opportunities and promote strong communities for allCalifornians.–––––Grants and fundingMobile home registrationBuilding standardsPlanning and community developmentPolicy and research Administrative agency for the California’s Building Code. Regulatory body forHousing Elements and State Housing Policy Lead. Lead State Agency for the Housing Recovery Support function under CaliforniaDisaster Recovery Framework.
CDBG-MIT Funding OverviewCDBG Mitigation (CDBG-MIT) is a new source offunding through HUD– Different from CDBG-DR unmet recovery needs grantWhat is Mitigation? Activities that increase resilience to disastersReduce or eliminate long-term riskLessen the impact of future disasters.CDBG-MIT is preventative measures instead of recovery.
How Does the State Access MIT Funds? The state submits an Action Plan to HUD. The Action Plan identifies the following information:– Detailed analysis of the unmet recovery needs.– Overview of the proposed recovery programs and how the fundswill be managed. HUD reviews and approves the Action Plan. Once approved, a Grant Agreement is signed and a line ofcredit is established. HCD does not have access to funding until the above stepsare completed.
CDBG-DR Mitigation Fund SequenceOngoing Stakeholder Outreach
CDBG-DR Mitigation Funding – NeedsAssessmentThe CDBG-MIT Mitigation Needs Assessment relies on:-State and local Hazard Mitigation PlansOther county/municipal data from the 2017 disastersCities and Counties impacted by disastersConsultations from state and local agenciese.g., CAL FIRE, Cal OES, OPR, Sierra Nevada Conservancy
MIT Funds Cover the 2017 and 2018Disasters
CDBG-MIT Action Plan – EngagementLocal Stakeholder SessionsRound 1 Public Meetings (1/8 – 1/22)–––––Ukiah – 25 attendeesSanta Rosa – 46 attendeesMarysville – 17 attendeesAlhambra – 32 attendeesVentura – 61 attendeesRound 2 Public Meetings (3/4 – 3/23)–––––Ventura – 32 attendeesSanta Barbara – 18 attendeesNapa – 4 attendeesSanta Rosa/Sonoma County – 25 attendeesNevada, Butte, Yuba Counties – 17 attendees
CDBG-MIT Action Plan - ConsultationsStakeholder Engagement Impacted local governments California Fire Safe Council– Statewide Fire Safe Councils Local offices for CAL FIRE –review project list Other state agencies
2018 CDBG-MIT Action Plan Amendment Expands eligible counties from 2017 to include ShastaCounty Expand MID areas to include 2018 areas Leverage existing programs (MIT-RIP and MIT-PPS) toshorten time for getting money to impacted areas Align 2017 DR-Infrastructure program implementation
CDBG-DR Mitigation Funding12
CDBG Mitigation Action Plan - Timeline
Key Takeaways – Initial Implementation Mitigation opened up areas that were unfamiliar tolocal CDBG administrators or housing departments. leveraged the experience of other state agencies tofamiliarize the team on new topics (fire, home hardening) Kept records of outreach activities (emails, flyers,attendee lists) and built a list of interested parties forfuture program communication. Leveraged state funding – used federal funds fill gapsnot being addressed by state funds.
Key Takeaways – Initial Implementation (cont.) Built relationships with other state/city agencies early,especially during the disaster response phase Brief early and often Relationships with other state agencies/local entities will assist with builtlocal trusted messengers about the programs Strategic relationships with local governments, local public meeting locations ensured outreach to federally protected classes andvulnerable populations
HCD CAC & ICARP TAC Partnership ICARP TAC supports coordination among state, regional, and localadaptation and resiliency efforts. HCD and OPR agree on the programmatic and policy alignmentbetween ICARP and HCD’s Disaster Recovery programs and thatICARP TAC is well-positioned to serve as HCD’s CAC for thepurposes of meeting CDBG-MIT grant requirements. The quarterly ICARP TAC meetings will service as CAC meetings.
Role of the ICARP TACThe CAC is not a decision-making body, but it is a required forum forprogram transparency, public engagement, and citizen feedback.In serving on the CAC, the ICARP TAC will:1. Provide a public venue to share insight on the CDBG-MIT programand process2. Provide feedback on CDBG-MIT program goals, design, andimplementation;3. Offer the collective technical expertise and professional insight ofTAC members;4. Advise the CDBG-MIT program on opportunities to advance climateresilience and adaptation in the context of disaster recoveryinvestments.
Next StepsICARP members bring diverse and inclusiveperspectives. How can we encourage/incentivize housing partners totake a comprehensive housing resilience approach? How do we balance environmental justice whilesupporting mitigation and resiliency efforts?Program implementation constraints: Comply with federal regulations Adhere to geographic limitations
Thank you! Questions?Maziar MovassaghiChief Disaster Recovery OfficerCA Department of Housing Community & Development(916) 263-5015 maziar.movassaghi@hcd.ca.gov
Stay in the know: Sign up for HCD email atwww.hcd.ca.gov
- Stakeholder Engagement - Program Funding Next Steps. . - Ventura - 61 attendees Round 2 Public Meetings (3/4 - 3/23) - Ventura - 32 attendees - Santa Barbara - 18 attendees . review project list Other state agencies. 2018 CDBG-MIT Action Plan Amendment
1. Post-Disaster Recovery and Disaster Risk Reduction require support from community participation in improving the quality and objectives of Disaster Management; 2. Community-based Disaster Risk Reduction is a key factor in participatory disaster management, including in post-disaster recovery, as indicated by best practices in Yogyakarta and .
Snatch Block, Shackle 6:24 Snatch Block, Hook 6:24 Snatch Block, others (page 6:29) 6:25 Tilt Wall Block 6:26 Oilfield Blocks 6:27 - 6:30 Tubing Block 6:27 Manhandler Block 6:28 Derrick Block 6:28 Laydown Block 6:29 Tong Line Block 6:30 Hay Fork Pulley 6:30 Guyline Block 6:30 J-Latches 6:31 T
Strategy for Disaster Reduction. An alignment of the terminology used in disaster risk reduction in Africa with the internationally acceptable concepts is logical. 2.1 Disaster Although the focus of disaster reduction is not on any actual disaster event itself, disaster remains the main focus. Thus our efforts must be geared towards the
namely Disaster and its classification, Disaster risk and Disaster Risk Reduction, Mainstreaming gender for Disaster Risk Reduction. IV. DISASTER AND ITS CLASSIFICATION Disaster is a phenomenon which can identify from the history of human civilization and it can be simply defined as an event
There are three important phases in hospital emergency disaster management plan 1) Pre-disaster phase 2) Disaster Phase 3) Post Disaster Phase Pre-Disaster Phase a) Planning: Most of the assessment and planning is done in the pre-disaster phase, the hospital plans are formulated and then discussed in a suitable forum for approval. b) Preparation
mayor lori lightfoot 2022-2023 community development grant application (cdga) request for proposal (rfp) for social service, housing, and economic development programs funded with: city of chicago local funds, community development block grant (cdbg), emergency solutions grant (esg), community services block grant (csbg), and state of illinois foreclosure prevention and emergency and .
community disaster—recognize that preparing for long-term disaster recovery demands as much attention as preparing for short-term response. After a major disaster, the recovery process takes months and even years to bring a community back to a "new normal" and as strong as or better than before the disaster. Disaster Recovery: A Local
Spring 2018 :: CSE 502 Simple Interleaved Main Memory Divide memory into n banks, “interleave” addresses across them so that cache-block A is –in bank “A mod n” –at block “A div n” Can access one bank while another one is busy Bank 0 Bank 1 Bank 2 Bank n Block in bank Bank Block 0 Block n Block 2n Block 1 Block n 1 Block .
