CMMI SCAMPI SM Class A Appraisal Results 2008 Mid-Year Update
Carnegie ftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsProcess Maturity ProfileCMMI SCAMPISM Class A Appraisal Results2008 Mid-Year UpdateSeptember 2008We could not produce this reportwithout the support of the organizationsand lead appraisers who reported theirappraisal results to the SEISM.Our many thanks for their continuingcooperation with our data collectionand analysis efforts.CMMI Appraisal ProgramThe Software Engineering Institute is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense and operated by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI, Capability Maturity Model and Carnegie Mellon are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySM SCAMPI and SEI are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University 2008 by Carnegie Mellon University 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 1
Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188Report Documentation PagePublic reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.1. REPORT DATE3. DATES COVERED2. REPORT TYPESEP 200800-00-2008 to 00-00-20084. TITLE AND SUBTITLE5a. CONTRACT NUMBERProcess Maturity Profile: CMMI SCAMPISM Class A Appraisal Results2008 Mid-Year Update5b. GRANT NUMBER5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER6. AUTHOR(S)5d. PROJECT NUMBER5e. TASK NUMBER5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Carnegie Mellon University ,Software Engineering Institute(SEI),Pittsburgh,PA,152139. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORTNUMBER(S)12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution unlimited13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES14. ABSTRACT15. SUBJECT TERMS16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF:a. REPORTb. ABSTRACTc. THIS PAGEunclassifiedunclassifiedunclassified17. LIMITATION OFABSTRACT18. NUMBEROF PAGESSame asReport (SAR)3219a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSONStandard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98)Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsOutlineIntroductionCurrent StatusCommunity TrendsOrganizational TrendsSummary And Terms used in this BriefingHow to Report your Appraisal Results to the SEIThis briefing is based solely on the appraisals reported to the SEI. It cannot be used as a source for an exact indicator of allorganizations in the world using CMMI models or appraisal methods nor can it be used for certification or verification purposes.The SEI does not certify appraisal results or organizations. The SEI licenses SEI Partners, authorizes lead appraisers, team leadersand certified high maturity lead appraisers to conduct appraisals. Neither the SEI nor any other organization is a “certifying authority”of the results from a SCAMPI appraisal. Therefore requests to the SEI to provide information to be used for this purpose can not befulfilled. Information provided by the SEI, such as this briefing, is to demonstrate reported results of the use of CMMI products andservices only.Organizations performing source selection or verification should consider performing an evaluation appraisal. For more information onappraisal methods and for a directory of authorized lead appraisers who can perform them, visit:http://www.sei.cmu.edu/appraisal-program/ 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 2
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsIntroduction: PurposeCharacterize the adoption of CMMI Describe results from Standard CMMI Appraisal Methodfor Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) v1.1/v1.2 Class Aappraisals using Capability Maturity Model Integration(CMMI) v1.1 /v1.2 *Encourage continued reporting of results* Organizations previously appraised against CMMI v1.0 and which have not reappraised against v 1.1 arenot included in this reportPlease visit: ndex.html for additional information orquestions you may have about this briefing before contacting the SEI directly 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 3
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsIntroduction - 2: Briefing ContentsThis briefing includes three primary sections:1. Current Status- Snapshot of the software community based on the mostrecent appraisal, since 2002, of reporting organizations2. Community Trends- Global distribution of appraisals- Growth in the number of appraisals performed- Shifts in the maturity profile over time3. Organizational Trends- Analysis of Process Area (PA) satisfaction- Time to move up in maturity based on change in maturitylevel and time between appraisals 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 4
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSection 1: Current StatusSCAMPI v1.1/v1.2 Class A appraisals conducted from theSCAMPI V1.1 April 2002 release through June 2008 andreported to the SEI by July 2008 3,553 3,009 2,168 451 17,398 69.9%appraisalsorganizationsparticipating companiesreappraised organizationsprojectsNon-USA organizationsPlease refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 30Additional charts providing different views and break down of this information will be added to this briefingas more appraisal data is reported to the SEI over time. 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 5
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsProcess Maturity Profileby All Reporting Organizations1800Number Of 4007.9%2003.0%1.3%0Not imizingBased on most recent appraisal of 3009 organizations 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 6
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsProcess Maturity Profile (V1.2 Only)by All Reporting Organizations800Number Of 2%1.1%0.7%0Not imizingBased on most recent appraisal of 958 organizations 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 7
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsReporting Organization Categories73.0%Commercial/In-houseContractor forMilitary/Government22.1%4.9%Military/Government Agency05001000150020002500Number of OrganizationsBased on 2983 organizations reporting an organization category 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 83000
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsProcess Maturity Profileby Reporting Organization Categories% Of Organizations Within Category100%90%Commercial/In-house 217880%Contractor for Military/Government 658Military/Government Agency .1%20%11.4%12.2%10%9.1%6.5%3.5%1.0% 2.0% 2.0%4.8%1.8%0.7%0%Not imizingBased on most recent appraisal of 2983 organizations reporting an organization category 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 9
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsOrganization TypeBased on Primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) CodeFinance, Insurance and RealEstate6.0%Transportation,Communication, Electric, Gasand Sanitary Services3.0%Wholesale Trade0.2%Retail Trade0.3%Public Administration(Including Defense)4.3%Fabricated Metal Products0.2%Primary Metal Industries0.4%Business Services34.8%Industrial Machinery ic & Other ElectricEquipment10.2%17.9%Instruments And RelatedProducts1.5%Transportation Equipment3.6%Engineering & ManagementServices23.8%Other Manuf acturingIndustries0.9%Other Services8.2%Health Services1.6%Based on 2165 organizations reporting SIC code. For more information visit: http://www.osha.gov/oshstats/sicser.html 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 10
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsOrganization SizeBased on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised501 to 10006.4%1001 to 20003.4%2000 2.2%25 or fewer13.7%301 to 5007.4%201 to 2000 27.9%201 to 3008.5%1 to 10052.4%26 to 5016.9%101 to 20019.7%51 to 7513.2%76 to 1008.6%Based on 2968 organizations reporting size data 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 11
Carnegie MellonCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSoftware Engineering InstituteMaturity Profile by Organization SizeBased on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was %42.6%47.0%52.8%60%48.4%70%54.5%64.8%80%1.7%% of Organizations by Size90%0%25 or fewer26 to 50Not Given51 to 75Initial76 to 100Managed101 to 200Defined201 to 300301 to 500501 to 1000 1001 to 2000Quantitatively ManagedOptimizingBased on 2968 organizations reporting size data 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 122000
Carnegie MellonCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSoftware Engineering InstituteDisciplines Selected for Appraisals(V1.1 Only)1600SE System EngineeringSW Software EngineeringIPPD Integrated Product andProcess Development49.2%SS SupplierSourcing140049.2%1200Number of SS1.4%SW/IPPD2.0%SW/SS2.8%0.1%0.0%0For more information about Allowable Models & Combinations, visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/background/aspec.html 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page PD/SSSWSE/SWBased on 2,576 appraisals reporting discipline data
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsUSA and Non-USAReporting Organization Categories288Commercial/Inhouse1890513Contractor forMilitary/Government145USA: 100% 901Non-USA: 100% %60%70%80%90%100%% of OrganizationsBased on 905 USA organizations and 2082 Non-USA organizations reporting an organization category 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 14
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsMaturity Profile by All ReportingUSA and Non-USA Organizations100%90%USA: 100 % 90580%% of OrganizationsNon-USA: 100 % 01324100%Not imizingBased on 905 USA organizations and 2104 Non-USA organizations 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 15
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSection 2: Community TrendsAppraisals conducted through June 2008 and reported to the SEI 63 Countries reported appraisals- most of the appraisals are from Asia and North America 2583 Appraisals were posted on PARS- the expired ones were removed and the reappraised werereplaced by the newest appraisals- the posting rate is increasing and it is 88% for 2007 andit is 93 % for 2008Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 30 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 16
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsCountries where Appraisals have beenPerformed and Reported to the SEIArgentinaBulgariaDominican outh AfricaUnited Arab ited alSwedenUnited StatesBelarusCosta RicaHong KongKorea, Republic OfNetherlandsRomaniaSwitzerlandUruguayBelgiumCzech RepublicHungaryLatviaNew ZealandRussiaTaiwanViet NamBrazilDenmarkIndiaLithuaniaNorwaySaudi ArabiaThailandRed country name: New additions with this reporting 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 17
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsNumber of Appraisals Reported to the SEIby Continent200018001593Number of 310AfricaAsiaEuropeNorth AmericaOceaniaSouth AmericaBased on 3553 appraisals 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 18
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsNumber of Appraisals and Maturity LevelsReported to the SEI by CountryCountryNumber lombiaCosta RicaCzech RepublicDenmarkDominican RepublicEgyptFinlandFranceGermanyHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesia573010 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer8810 or fewer47275851910 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer3110 or fewer125581510 or fewer36210 or fewerIreland10 or fewerIsraelItalyJapan1619241Korea, Republic Of 112Latvia10 or fewerLithuania10 or fewerMaturity Maturity Maturity Maturity MaturityLevel 1Level 2Level 3 Level 4Level 5Reported Reported Reported Reported Reported 13549117 2008 by Carnegie Mellon University2Number coNetherlandsNew RomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSingaporeSlovakiaSouth AfricaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTurkey10 or fewer5010 or fewer4510 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer2410 or fewer2010 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer10 or fewer1610 or fewer10 or fewer8510 or fewer10 or fewer1111311Ukraine10 or fewerUnited Arab Emirates10 or fewerUnited Kingdom79United States1136UruguayViet NamSeptember 2008Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity MaturityLevel 1 Level 2Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Reported Reported Reported Reported 94042639434212121211810 or fewer10 or fewerProcess Maturity Profile - Page 19
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsNumber of SCAMPI A AppraisalsReported to SEI by Year120010281000Number of AppraisalsTOTALPOSTED ON 02002200320042005200620072008Based on 3553 appraisals 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 20
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsNumber of SCAMPI A AppraisalsReported to SEI by Year12001006Number of Appraisals1000180First 0072008Based on 3553 appraisals 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 21
Carnegie MellonCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSoftware Engineering InstituteTrends in the Community Maturity .3%8.0%10%7.7%20%12.7%18.6%30%8.4%% of Organizations70%Orgs0%Not GivenInitialManagedDefined Quantitatively ManagedOptimizingBased on a cumulative view of the most recent appraisals of organizations up through the year indicated 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 22
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSection 3: Organizational TrendsAppraisals conducted through June 2008 and reported to theSEI 1,227 Process Area (PA) profiles- satisfaction of PAs by maturity level for organizationsappraised at levels 1 and 2 451 reappraised organizations- accounting for 995 appraisals- although some organizations conducted multiplereappraisals, only the first and latest appraisals were usedin creating the charts on pages 26Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 30 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 23
Carnegie MellonCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSoftware Engineering InstituteProcess Area Profiles - 1Organizations Appraised at Maturity Level DOPPFully 100%% of AppraisalsBased on 70 appraisals reporting a maturity level 1 rating 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 24
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsProcess Area Profiles - 2Organizations Appraised at Maturity Level 2QuantitativelyManagedOPPQPMOEIDARFully dRD0%5%10%15%20%% of AppraisalsBased on 1157 appraisals reporting a maturity level 2 rating 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 25
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsMaturity Level ofFirst and Latest 1%% of Organizations70%0%Not imizingBased on 451 reappraised organizations using their first and latest appraisal 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 26
Carnegie MellonCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSoftware Engineering InstituteTime to Move Up10075Number ofmonthsto move to nextmaturity level50Largest observedvalue that is not anoutlier3019181917161313575th Percentile15.512.59440Time Period of Initial Appraisal2002 to 20052006 to PresentLevel 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 4 to 5 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 4 to 5Orgs 1299221635568 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Median25th PercentileSmallest observedvalue that is not anoutlierAll (2002 to Present)1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 4 to 5151542824Process Maturity Profile - Page 27
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSummary - 13553 appraisals have been reported to the SEI in 76 monthsThe Organization Category of “Commercial/In-house” reportsmost of the appraisalsThe highest percentage of “Commercial/In-house” reportingappraisals is from outside the USAThe highest percentage of “Military/Government Agency”reporting appraisals is from the USAOutside the USA: China, India, Spain, Argentina, Brazil andMalaysia reported appraisals are increasing at a rapid rate 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 28
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsSummary - 2For organizations that began their CMMI-based SCAMPI effort in2002 or later, the median time to move from: maturity level 1 to 2 is 4 monthsmaturity level 2 to 3 is 17 monthsmaturity level 3 to 4 is 15.5 monthsmaturity level 4 to 5 is 12.5 months 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 29
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsTerms Used in this ReportCompany- Parent of the appraised entityA company can be a commercial or non-commercial firm, for-profitor not for-profit business, a research and development unit, a highereducation unit, a government agency, or branch of service, etc.Organization - a.k.a. Appraised entityThe organization unit to which the appraisal results apply. Anappraised entity can be the entire company, a selected businessunit, units supporting a particular product line or service, etc.Non-USA- Appraised entity whose geographic location is not within the UnitedStates. The parent of the appraised entity may or may not be basedwithin the United States. 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 30
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsReport your Appraisal Results to the SEIThe briefing is only possible due to the cooperation of organizationsand individuals sending in their appraisal results to the SEIIn order to provide this information and service in the future,it will depend on this continued cooperationPlease file/index.htmlfor forms, information, and instructions on how to report appraisalsto the SEI 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 31
Carnegie MellonSoftware Engineering InstituteCMMI v1.1/V1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal ResultsContact InformationPlease file/index.htmland review the information provided before contacting:SEI Customer RelationsSEI FAX number(412) 268-5800(412) 268-5758Internet Addresscustomer-relations@sei.cmu.eduMailing AddressCustomer RelationsSoftware Engineering InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 2008 by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySeptember 2008Process Maturity Profile - Page 32
CMMI Appraisal Program The Software Engineering Institute is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense and operated by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI, Capability Maturity Model and Carnegie Mellon are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University
CMMI-DEV CMMI-SVC The CMMI Product Suite is composed of models, training, and appraisals: Training SCAMPI Appraisals. Crest Consulting CMMI-Services Appraisal Approach The SCAMPI approach will be used. CMMI-SVC
CMMI-DEV process assets can be reused in adopting CMMI-SVC Substantial overlap between CMMI-SVC process areas and ISO/IEC 20000 processes CMMI-SCV will be supported by SEI Partners (SEI 2007) 226 Partners offer Introduction to CMMI 248 Partners offer SCAMPI appraisal services 54,460 Introduction to CMMI courses since 2000
CMMI-DEV and CMMI-SVC Could we leverage the overlap between CMMI-DEV and CMMI-SVC? CMMI-DEV v1.3 Has a total of 18 Process Areas (PAs) From which 17 PA directly apply to Pasadena Operations The Supplier Agreements Management (SAM) PA is not implemented For Maturity Level 3 12 out of the 18 PA are the same for CMMIDEV and CMMI- -SVCFile Size: 236KB
CMMI-SVC CMMI-DEV & CMMI-SVC CMMI- DEV CMMI-SVC Provides guidance for delivering services within organization or for external customers CMMI-DEV Provides guidance for managing, measuring &am
CMMI Capability Maturity Model Integration CMMI-ACQ CMMI for Acquisition CMMI-DEV CMMI for Development CMMI-SVC CMMI for Services COTS C ommercial off-the-shelf CSCI Computer software configuration ite
In contrast, CMMI is aimed at intellectual work CMMI-DEV (formerly called CMMI -SW/SE) is specific to software and systems . development but for all kinds of software or HW/SW systems There is also a CMMI-SVC for services There is also a CMMI-ACQ for acquisition Like TQM, CMMI also pays attention to human factors
ØCMMI for Development (CMMI-DEV), Version 1.2 (08/2006) ØCMMI for Acquisition (CMMI-ACQ), Version 1.2 (11/2007) ØCMMI for Services (CMMI-SVC), (2009) Ø Primary focus: process improvement ØOrganizations cannot be CMMI “certified”, but are appraised and awarded a 1-5 level rating (e.g., using SCAMPI
Introduction to CMMI for (CMMI-DEV and CMMI-SVC), Version 1.3 SSQC's action focused diagnostic mini-assessments for launching a process improvement program based on CMMI SCAMPI B and C appraisals for process improvement and pre-assessments CMMI cer
