Source And On-site Controls For Municipal Drainage Systems

2y ago
3 Views
2 Downloads
1.16 MB
58 Pages
Last View : 1y ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Halle Mcleod
Transcription

SOURCE AND ON-SITECONTROLS FOR MUNICIPALDRAINAGE SYSTEMSA BEST PRACTICE BY THE NATIONAL GUIDETO SUSTAINABLE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Source and On-Site Controls for Municipal Drainage SystemsIssue No.: 1.0Date: March 2003 2003 Federation of Canadian Municipalities and National Research CouncilThe contents of this publication are presented in good faith and are intended as general guidance onmatters of interest only. The publisher, the authors and the organizations to which the authors belongmake no representations or warranties, either express or implied, as to the completeness or accuracy of thecontents. All information is presented on the condition that the persons receiving it will make their owndeterminations as to the suitability of using the information for their own purposes and on theunderstanding that the information is not a substitute for specific technical or professional advice orservices. In no event will the publisher, the authors or the organizations to which the authors belong, beresponsible or liable for damages of any nature or kind whatsoever resulting from the use of, or relianceon, the contents of this publication

Source and On-Site Controls for Municipal Drainage SystemsTable of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTSForeword. vAcknowledgements .viiExecutive Summary . ix1. General . 11.1 Introduction. 11.2 Scope. 11.3 Glossary . 22. Rationale. 72.1 General Impacts of Urban Run-Off . 72.2 Impacts on Water Quality . 92.3 Impacts on Stream Morphology. 92.4 Impacts on Localized Flooding. 92.5 Impacts on the Hydrologic Cycle . 93. Best Management Practices and Run-Off Controls . 113.1 Treatment Train and General Framework. 113.2 Selection of BMPs . 123.3 Criteria for BMPs. 143.3.1 Criteria for Water Quality Control. 153.3.2 Criteria for Erosion Control . 153.3.3 Criteria for Quantity Control. 153.3.4 Criteria for Preservation of Hydrologic Control . 163.3.5 Maintenance Requirements. 163.4 Description of BMPs. 163.4.1 Source Control . 163.4.2 On-Site Controls . 183.4.3 Pretreatment and Special Purposes BMPs . 274. Application . 314.1 General Process for Implementation. 314.2 Effectiveness of Source and On-Site Controls. 334.3 Cold Climate Challenges for Stormwater BMPs . 364.4 Costs Information for On-Site Controls (for planning purposes) . 36Appendix A: Background Information for Water Quality . 39References. 45TABLESTable 4–1: Expected Effectiveness and Relevant Considerationsfor Source Control. 34Table 4–2: Expected Effectiveness and Relevant Considerationsfor On-Site Control . 35Table 4–3: Cold Climate Challenges for Stormwater BMPs . 36Table 4–4: Costs Information for On-Site Control (for planning purposes). 38March 2003iii

Table of ContentsNational Guide to Sustainable Municipal InfrastructureFIGURESFigure 2–1: Changes in Watershed Hydrology as a Result of Urbanization . 8Figure 3–1: Treatment Train for Control of Urban Stormwater Run-Off. 11Figure 3–2: Examples of On-Lot Infiltration Systems. 23Figure 3–3: Examples of Infiltration Trenches . 24Figure 3–4: Examples of Grassed Swale Systems . 26Figure 3–5: Grassed and Wooded Filter Strips. 28Figure 3–6: Three-Chamber Oil/Grit Separator. 29Figure 3–7: Bypass Oil/Grit Separator . 29Figure 4–1: General Flow Chart to Develop a Stormwater Management Plan . 32ivMarch 2003

Source and On-Site Controls for Municipal Drainage SystemsForewordFOREWORDIn spite of recent increases in public infrastructure investments, municipalinfrastructure is decaying faster than it is being renewed. Factors such as lowfunding, population growth, tighter health and environmental requirements, poorquality control leading to inferior installation, inadequate inspection andmaintenance, and lack of consistency and uniformity in design, construction andoperation practices have impacted on municipal infrastructure. At the same time,an increased burden on infrastructure due to significant growth in some sectorstends to quicken the ageing process while increasing the social and monetary costof service disruptions due to maintenance, repairs or replacement.With the intention of facing these challenges and opportunities, the Federation ofCanadian Municipalities (FCM) and the National Research Council (NRC) havejoined forces to deliver the National Guide to Sustainable MunicipalInfrastructure: Innovations and Best Practices. The Guide project, funded by theInfrastructure Canada program, NRC, and through in-kind contributions frompublic and private municipal infrastructure stakeholders, aims to provide adecision-making and investment planning tool as well as a compendium oftechnical best practices. It provides a road map to the best available knowledgeand solutions for addressing infrastructure issues. It is also a focal point for theCanadian network of practitioners, researchers and municipal governmentsfocused on infrastructure operations and maintenance.The National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure offers theopportunity to consolidate the vast body of existing knowledge and shape it intobest practices that can be used by decision makers and technical personnel in thepublic and private sectors. It provides instruments to help municipalities identifyneeds, evaluate solutions, and plan long-term, sustainable strategies for improvedinfrastructure performance at the best available cost with the least environmentalimpact. The five initial target areas of the Guide are: potable water systems(production and distribution), storm and wastewater systems (collection,treatment, disposal), municipal roads and sidewalks, environmental protocols anddecision making and investment planning.Part A of the National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure focuses ondecision-making and investment planning issues related to municipalinfrastructure. Part B is a compendium of technical best practices and isqualitatively distinct from Part A. Among the most significant of its distinctionsis the group of practitioners for which it is intended. Part A, or the decisionmaking and investment planning component of the Guide, is intended to supportthe practices and efforts of elected officials and senior administrative andmanagement staff in municipalities throughout Canada.March 2003v

ForewordNational Guide to Sustainable Municipal InfrastructureIt is expected that the Guide will expand and evolve over time. To focus on themost urgent knowledge needs of infrastructure planners and practitioners, thecommittees solicited and received recommendations, comments and suggestionsfrom various stakeholder groups, which shaped the enclosed document.Although the best practices are adapted, wherever possible, to reflect varyingmunicipal needs, they remain guidelines based on the collective judgements ofpeer experts. Discretion must be exercised in applying these guidelines toaccount for specific local conditions (e.g. geographic location, municipality size,climatic condition).For additional information or to provide comments and feedback, please visit theGuide at www.infraguide.gc.ca or contact the Guide team atinfraguide@nrc.ca.viMarch 2003

Source and On-Site Controls for Municipal Drainage SystemsAcknowledgementsACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe dedication of individuals who volunteered their time and expertise in theinterest of the National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure isacknowledged and much appreciated.This best practice was developed by stakeholders from Canadian municipalitiesand specialists from across Canada, based on information from a scan ofmunicipal practices and an extensive literature review. The following membersof the National Guide’s Storm and Wastewater Technical Committee providedguidance and direction in the development of this best practice. They wereassisted by the Guide Directorate staff and by SNC-Lavalin inc., in associationwith Aquapraxis inc.John Hodgson, ChairAndré AubinRichard BoninDavid CalamKulvinder DhillonTom FieldWayne GreenSam MorraPeter SetoTimothy A. TooleBilgin BuberogluCity of Edmonton, AlbertaVille de Montréal, QuebecVille de Québec, QuebecCity of Regina, SaskatchewanProvince of Nova Scotia, Halifax, Nova ScotiaDelcan Corporation, Vancouver, British ColumbiaCity of Toronto, OntarioOntario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association,Mississauga, OntarioNational Water Research Institute, Environment Canada,Burlington, OntarioTown of Midland, OntarioTechnical Advisor, NRCIn addition, the Storm and Wastewater Technical Committee would like to thankthe following individuals for their participation in working groups and peerreview:Richard BoninJerry CheshukTom FieldKen LinnenChristina JacobChris JohnstonAlain MailhotJiri MarsalekBrian MilliganJohn SibbalFabio TontoLaura MacLeanEd von EuwMarch 2003Ville de Québec, QuebecCity of Yorkton, SaskatchewanDelcan Corporation, Vancouver, British ColumbiaStantec, Regina, SaskatchewanGVRD, Vancouver, British ColumbiaKerr Wood Leidal Associates Ltd, British ColumbiaINRS-ETE, Québec, QuebecNational Water Research Institute, Environment CanadaBurlington, OntarioTown of Midland, OntarioRegional Municipality of Halifax, Nova ScotiaStormceptor Canada Inc., Toronto, OntarioEnvironment Canada, Vancouver, British ColumbiaGVRD, Vancouver, British Columbiavii

AcknowledgementsNational Guide to Sustainable Municipal InfrastructureThis and other best practices could not have been developed without theleadership and guidance of the Project Steering Committee and the TechnicalSteering Committee of the National Guide to Sustainable MunicipalInfrastructure, whose memberships are as follows:Project Steering Committee:Mike Badham, ChairCity Councillor, Regina, SaskatchewanStuart BriesePortage la Prairie, ManitobaBill CrowtherCity of Toronto, OntarioJim D’OrazioGreater Toronto Sewer and WatermainContractors Association, OntarioDerm FlynnMayor, Appleton, NewfoundlandDavid GeneralCambridge Bay, NunavutRalph HaasUniversity of Waterloo, OntarioBarb HarrisWhitehorse, YukonRobert HiltonOffice of Infrastructure, Ottawa, OntarioDwayne KalynchukCity of St. Albert, AlbertaJoan LougheedCity Councillor, Burlington, OntarioStakeholder Liaison RepresentativeRené MorencyRégie des installations olympiquesMontréal, QuebecSaeed MirzaMcGill University, Montréal, QuebecLee NaussCity Councillor, Lunenburg, Nova ScotiaRic RobertshawRegion of Halton, OntarioDave RudbergCity of Vancouver, British ColumbiaVan SimonsonCity of Saskatoon, SaskatchewanBasile StewartMayor, Summerside, Prince Edward IslandSerge ThériaultDepartment of Environment and LocalGovernment, New BrunswickAlec WatersAlberta Transportation, Edmonton, AlbertaWally WellsDillon Consulting Ltd., Toronto, OntarioTechnical Steering Committee:Don BrynildsenCity of Vancouver, British ColumbiaAl CepasCity of Edmonton, AlbertaAndrew CowanCity of Winnipeg, ManitobaTim DennisCity of Toronto, OntarioKulvinder DhillonProvince of Nova Scotia, Halifax, Nova ScotiaWayne GreenCity of Toronto, OntarioJohn HodgsonCity of Edmonton, AlbertaBob LorimerLorimer & Associates, Whitehorse, YukonBetty Matthews-Malone City of Hamilton, OntarioUmendra MitalCity of Surrey, British ColumbiaAnne-Marie ParentCity Councillor, City of Montréal, QuebecPiero SalvoWSA Trenchless Consultants Inc., Ottawa, OntarioMike SheflinFormer CAO, Regional Municipalityof Ottawa–Carleton, OntarioKonrad SiuCity of Edmonton, AlbertaCarl YatesHalifax Regional Water Commission,Nova ScotiaviiiMarch 2003

Source and On-Site Controls for Municipal Drainage SystemsExecutive SummaryEXECUTIVE SUMMARYIn the past, water management activities have often been based on singularpractices that addressed individual needs and crises. In later years, there has beenan evolution to multiple objective programs that manage water supply andconservation, with preservation of surface water and natural systems being amain objective. The continued growth of the population and the hydrologicimpact of urbanization demand that we take a holistic approach in waterresources planning and management to support our quality of life.As stormwater run-off can cause or accentuate flooding, and is a major source ofpollution to our wetlands, rivers, lakes, and estuaries, local governments musttake responsibility for its appropriate control. An understanding of the origin andcauses of non-point source pollution is essential to the development ofcomprehensive and efficient practices and measures to control the negativeimpacts of urban development. These measures should be integrated intomultiple objective programs to ensure watershed goals are co-operatively met.Such programs will fall under provincial/regional water policies and by-laws andshould be consistent with comprehensive short- and long-term objectives.This document provides a brief overview of the rationale behind stormwatermanagement programs and explains why implementing run-off controls isimportant in a sustainable development context. Using the concept of a treatmenttrain, five different levels of control are defined: pollution prevention planning,source control, on-site control, conveyance control, and end-of-pipe control. Thisbest practice addresses the second and third levels.Source controls are measures designed to minimize the generation of, and entryof pollutants into, stormwater run-off, with emphasis on non-structural andsemi-structural measures applied at or near source. On-site (or lot-level)controls are practices that reduce run-off volumes and/or treat stormwater beforeit reaches a municipal conveyance system. These controls can be either structuralor non-structural in nature and applied at the individual lot level or on multiplelots that drain a small area. Typically, these techniques would be implemented onindividual dwelling lots or for small commercial/industrial lots.The negative impacts of increased stormwater runoff are classified by theireffects on water quality, stream channel morphology, localized flooding and thehydrologic cycle. Historically, only the flooding (quantitative) aspect has beenused as a main design objective but it is now recognized that criteria with a largerperspective are necessary in a sustainable development context. Criteria for eachof these aspects are therefore discussed in order to provide a good overview ofthe different elements that should ideally be included in a stormwater controlplan.March 2003ix

Executive SummaryNational Guide to Sustainable Municipal InfrastructureAlthough some of the techniques can be applied to a wide range of situations,different elements must be considered to select appropriate practices. Theseinclude the physical suitability of the site, the stormwater benefits provided, thepollutant removal benefits and the environmental amenities. A detaileddescription of the different practices is given, with appropriate design criteria ineach case. A general approach to implement the different techniques is alsoprovided, with a flow chart to aid in the overall stormwater analysis.The degree of effectiveness of the different controls, and costs andoperation/maintenance issues are also discussed, as they are essential elements inthe decision-making process. As far as possible, design aspects and referencesrelated to cold climate conditions are highlighted to reflect a Canadianperspective.xMarch 2003

Source and On-Site Controls for Municipal Drainage Systems1.GENERAL1.1INTRODUCTIONGeneralIt is widely recognized that rapid urbanization affects water quality in receivingwater bodies and run-off quantity, thereby producing significant environmentaland hydrologic changes that can impact streams, receiving waters, and theirhabitats. As an area develops, undisturbed pervious surfaces become imperviouswith the construction of parking lots, buildings, homes, streets, and otherstructures. These impervious surfaces produce an increase in stormwater run-off,both quantitatively (discharges rates and volumes) and qualitatively (pollutantsassociated with run-off). These changes disrupt the natural balance of physical,chemical, and biological processes, cause pollution in natural systems, result insoil erosion that creates damage downstream and reduce the infiltration of waterinto the ground. In addition, the increase in run-off discharge through existingdrainage systems may cause or aggravate flooding which is, arguably, the mostvisible (and usually the most acted upon) of the negative impacts.To address stormwater management objectives, stormwater run-offconsiderations need to be integrated fully into the site planning and designprocesses. This involves a more comprehensive approach to site planning and athorough understanding of the physical characteristics and resources of the site.This approach, normally called “integrated stormwater management planning”,treats stormwater as a resource to be protected and sees protection of property,protection of aquatic resources, and protection of water quality as complementaryobjectives. Ideally, stormwater is managed on a watershed basis, within the broadframework of land management and ecosystem planning or, at least, within amaster drainage plan. This planning should be based on a hierarchy of principleswhich include pollution prevention, source controls, on-site (or lot-level)controls, conveyance controls, and end-of-pipe management practices.1.2SCOPEThis best practice is part of a wider project that will lead to the development ofthe National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure: Innovations andBest Practices. It is one aspect of more than 50 that have been identified by theGuide Storm and Wastewater Technical Committee relating to linearinfrastructure, wastewater treatment, customer interaction, and receiving waterissues. Links with other best practices developed during the first round of theGuide are limited at this stage. These links will become more integrated asfurther rounds are completed.The rationale to implement source and on-site controls is first presented, alongwith criteria for selecting the most appropriate measures and techniquesdepending on the site and watershed characteristics. A description ofmethodologies and technologies for source and on-site controls is then given,based on available and tested approaches. The degree of effectiveness for theMarch 20031

GeneralNational Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructuredifferent controls, and costs and operation/maintenance issues are also presented,as they are essential elements in the decision-making process. As far as possible,design aspects and references related to cold climate conditions are highlighted toreflect a Canadian perspective.Beginning with pollution prevention, which should be the first logical step in thetreatment train, this document discusses the lower levels of controls (source andon-site controls). These are typically applied to sites with a drainage area lessthan 5 ha and are generally more cost effective than the conveyance andend-of-pipe controls.This best practice is not intended to be a design manual or guide forimplementing a stormwater management system, with detailed technicalinformation and design criteria. A number of such guides and manuals arealready available for that purpose, and relevant information in existingdocuments is referenced as appropriate. Many documents developed specificallyfor Canadian conditions by different provinces or cities are available on theInternet, and it is easy to download and use the appropriate and up-to-dateinformation.1.3GLOSSARYAs the terminology on stormwater source controls is not standardized and thisterm is used differently by various drainage professionals (Marsalek et al., 2001),it is worthwhile to define more precisely some fundamental terminology.Aesthetics (as a water quality parameter) — All surface waters should be freefrom pollutants in concentrations or combinations that settle to formobjectionable deposits; float as debris, scum, or other matter to form nuisances;produce objectionable odour, colour, taste, or turbidity; or produce undesirable ornuisance species of aquatic life.Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) — The quantity of oxygen consumed,expressed in milligrams per liter, during the biochemical oxidation of matter overa specified period at a temperature of 20 C (see also COD).Best Management Practices (BMP) — See stormwater management.Buffer strips — A zone of variable width located along both sides of a naturalfeature (e.g., stream or forested area) and designed to provide a protective areaalong a corridor.Catch basin — A conventional structure for the capture of stormwater. It is usedin streets and parking areas and typically includes an inlet, sump, and outlet. Itprovides minimal removal of suspended solids. In many cases, a hood is includedto separate oil and grease from the stormwater.2March 2003

Source and On-Site Controls for Municipal Drainage SystemsGeneralCheck dam — A small dam constructed in a gully or other small watercourse todecrease flow velocity (by reducing the channel gradient), minimize scour, andpromote sediment deposition.Chemical oxygen demand (COD) — A monitoring test that measures all theoxidizable matter found in a sample, a portion of which could deplete dissolvedoxygen in receiving waters.Conveyance controls — Practices that reduce run-off volumes and treatstormwater while the flow is being conveyed through the drainage system.Design storm — A rainfall event of a specific size and return frequency(e.g., two-year, 24-hour storm) that is used to calculate run-off volume and peakdischarge rate.Discharge — Water or effluent released to a receiving water body (m3/s or L/s).Drainage area (watershed) — The area contributing run-off to a single pointmeasured in a horizontal plane, which is enclosed by a ridge line.End-of-pipe controls — Practices that reduce discharge volumes and treatstormwater at the outlet of drainage systems, just before it reaches the receivingstreams or waters. These controls are usually structural and implemented tomanage the run-off from larger drainage areas.Eutrophication — The process of over-enrichment of waters by nutrients, oftentypified by the presence of algal blooms.Event mean concentration (EMC) — The average concentration of an urbanpollutant measured during a storm run-off event. The EMC is calculated byweighing each pollutant sample in a flow of water during a storm event.Fecal coliform bacteria — Minute living organisms associated with human oranimal feces. These bacteria are often used as an indirect indicator of thepresence of other disease-causing bacteria.Filter strip — A strip of permanent vegetation above ponds, diversions, andother structures to retard the flow of run-off, causing deposition of transportedmaterial, thereby reducing sediment loading.First flush — Pollutant concentrations, including suspended sediments, carriedby stormwater in the beginning of a storm. These concentrations are typicallyhigher than at the middle or end of the storm.Groundwater recharge — The return of water to an underground aquifer byeither natural or artificial means such as exfiltration as a BMP.Hydrograph — A graph showing the variation in stage (depth) or discharge of astream over time.March 20033

GeneralNational Guide to Sustainable Municipal InfrastructureImpervious cover (I) — Those surfaces in the landscape that cannot infiltratestormwater (e.g., building rooftops, pavement, sidewalks, driveways).Infiltration rate (f) — The rate at which stormwater percolates into the subsoilmeasured in millimetres per hour.Integrated Stormwater Management Planning (ISMP) — A planningapproach to integrate watershed-based planning processes such as watershedplans, catchment plans, master drainage plans, and stormwater plans into relevantmunicipal planning processes such as Official Community Plans orNeighbourhood Concept Plans, Recreation and Parks Master Plans, StrategicTransportation Plans, etc., in order to address the impacts of stormwatermanagement on relevant community values. These values may includerecreation, agriculture, fisheries, greenways, heritage, archaeology, safety,transportation, economics, property values, flood protection, affordability, theenvironment, and related issues.Loading — The quantity of a substance entering the environment (soil, water, orair).Non-structural BMPs — Stormwater run-off treatment techniques which usenatural measures to reduce pollution levels, do not require extensive constructionefforts, and promote pollutant reduction by eliminating the pollutant source.One in 2 (1/2) year storm — A flood event which occurs, on average, onceevery 2 years or, statistically, has a 50% percent chance of occurring in a givenyear.On-site (or lot-level) controls — Practices that reduce run-off quantity andimprove quality of stormwater before it reaches a municipal conveyance system.The controls are often structural and applied at the individual lot level or onmultiple lots that drain a small area.Pollutant — Any substance of such character and in such quantities that, onreaching the environment (soil, water or air), is degrading in effect, impairing theenvironment’s usefulness or rendering it offensive.Porosity (n) — Ratio of pore volume to total volume.Pretreatment — Techniques employed in stormwater BMPs to provide storageor filtering to help trap coarse materials and other pollutants before they enter thesystem.Run-off — That portion of the precipitation on a drainage area that is dischargedfrom the area to the stream channels. This includes surface and groundwaterrun-off or seepage.Sediment — Soils or other superficial materials transported or deposited by theaction of wind, water, ice, or gravity as a product of erosion.4March 2003

Source and On-Site Controls for Municipal Drainage SystemsGeneralSource controls — Measures designed to minimize the generation and entry ofpollutants into stormwater run-off and to manage volumes and rates of run-off,with emphasis on non-structural and semi-structural measures applied at or nearthe source.Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) — Practices, techniques, andmethods of managing stormwater drainage for adequate flood control andpollutant reduction by using the most cost-effective and practicable means thatare economically acceptable to the community. Generally, BMPs are stormwatermanagement methods that attempt to replicate as much of the “natural” run-offcharacteristics and infiltration components of the undeveloped system as possibleand reduce or prevent water quality degradation. The different measures can beengineered systems (structural BMPs) that improve the quality and control thequantity of run-off (e.g., detention ponds and constructed wetlands) or pollutionprevention practices designed to limit the generation of storm water run-off orreduce the amount of pollutants contained in the run-off (non-structural BMPs).Use of the term Best Management Practices could be confused with the moregeneric term Best Practices, but it has been kept in the present document as it isnow well accepted in actual practice and relevant literature.Stream morphology — The study of the structure and form of a stream or river(e.g., bank, bed, channel, depth, width, and roughness of the channel).Structural BMPs — Devices c

source and on-site controls for municipal drainage systems a b est p ractice by the n

Related Documents:

the Source 1 power source until the Source 2 power source does appear. Conversely, if connected to the Source 2 power source and the Source 2 power source fails while the Source 1 power source is still unavailable, the ATS remains connected to the Source 2 power source. ATSs automatically perform the transfer function and include three basic .

Working with ASP.NET Server Controls WHAT YOU WILL LEARN IN THIS CHAPTER: ‰ What ASP.NET Server Controls are ‰ The di! erent kinds of server controls you have at your disposal ‰ The common behavior shared among most of the server controls ‰ How the ASP.NET run time processes the server controls on your page ‰ How server controls are able to maintain their state across postbacks

Software Source Code: Perl Source (By content) Software Source Code: Perl Source (By file extension) Software Source Code: Python (Default) Software Source Code: Python (Wide) Software Source Code: x86 Assembly Source Code SPICE Source Code Policy for detection of integrated circuits design source code in SPICE

accept Direct Digital Controls (DDC) for VAV pressure independent operation. The terminal unit controls are supplied by the controls contractor and either factory or field mounted and wired. For information concerning controls, components, sequence of operation, etc., please refer to the documentation provided by the controls contractor.

L ighting controls include switches, dimmers, timers, motion detectors, photosensors, and central controls. Lighting controls operate the lamps within luminaires. In most applications, the greatest opportunity to avoid wasted lighting energy is the proper use of controls. Lighting controls appropriate- for use in homes can be operated manually or

1. Area Controls: Manual controls that control lighting in each area separately 2. Multi-level Controls: Allow occupants to choose the appropriate light level for each area 3. Shut-off Controls: Automatically shuts off lighting or reduces light levels when illumination is not needed 4. Automatic Daylighting Controls: Adjust electric lighting in

DDC Controls-Use Open Networks BacNet (don't be confused with multiple systems) 20 DDC Controls-Use Open Networks BacNet (View all controls from one network) 21 DDC Control Intervention is the Key. 22 DDC Controls Be Sure Your DDC Controls Vendor is Using BacNet. 23 DDC Controls BacNet. 24

individuality or conformity. Synthesize at least three of the sources for support. You may refer to the sources by their titles (Source A, Source B, etc.) or by the descriptions in the parentheses. Source A (Gatto) Source B (Bell schedule) Source C (Book cover) Source D (Postman) Source E (Holt) Source F (Photo) Source G (Expectations)