Vanden High School - Travis Unified School District
Single Plan for Student Achievement2015-16Vanden High SchoolVanden High School Site CouncilVanden High School2951 Markeley Ln.Fairfield Ca, 94533707-437-7333School Site Council Approval Date: December 16, 2015
The Single Plan for Student AchievementSchool: Vanden High SchoolDistrict: Travis Unified School DistrictCounty-District School (CDS) Code: 48-70565-4838801Principal: William SartyDate of this revision: December 9th, 2015The Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) is a plan of actions to raise theacademic performance of all students. California Education Code sections 41507,41572, and 64001 and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)require each school to consolidate all school plans for programs funded through theConApp and ESEA Program Improvement into the SPSA.For additional information on school programs and how you may become involvedlocally, please contact the following person:Contact Person:William SartyPosition:PrincipalTelephone Number:707-437-7333 ex. 8005Address:2951 Markeley Ln. Fairfield Ca. 94533E-mail Address:wsarty@travisusd.orgThe District Governing Board approved this revision of the SPSA on December 8, 2015(pending).
Table of ContentsForm A: Planned Improvements in Student Achievement . 22Form B: Centralized Services for Planned Improvements in Student Performance. 33Form C: Programs Included in This Plan . 34Form D: School Site Council Membership . 37Form E: Recommendations and Assurances. 38Form G: Single Plan for Student Achievement Annual Evaluation . 39Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 2014iii
Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201416
Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201417
Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201418
Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201419
Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201420
Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201421
Form A: Planned Improvements in Student PerformanceDefinitions: ELA English language arts; ELD English language development; LCAP Local Control Accountability Plan; LCFF Local Control FundingFormula, or unrestricted general fund dollars; PLC Professional Learning Community, collaborative teacher work teams; RtI2 Response to Instruction andIntervention student academic support system; SGF Supplemental Grant FundsThe School Site Council has analyzed the academic performance of all student groups and has considered the effectiveness of keyelements of the instructional program for students failing to meet academic performance index and adequate yearly progress growthtargets. As a result, it has adopted the following school goals, related actions, and expenditures to raise the academic performance ofstudents not yet meeting state standards:LCAP Goal #1 (LEA Goal): Improve academic achievement for all students.SCHOOL GOAL:1.2.3.4.5.6.Provide guaranteed and viable curriculum for all students.We will continue to work to reduce and eliminate the achievement gap between subgroups.Increase ELA, CAASP Testing, EAP, and Department Benchmarks and Final Exams.Develop and implement intervention programs for struggling students and credit recovery programs for failing students.Improve student achievement on standardized tests including EAP and new testing by the state.Improved attendance by students; improved administration of accommodations.What data did you use to form this goal? Smarter Balanced assessments in ELA andmath CELDT data (measure of English learnerproficiency in English) Course gradesWhat were the findings from the analysis ofthis data? Data shows freshman D and F rate higherthan other grade levels.EL students making progress but stillhave areas of needed growth.CAASP data show ELA above statestandards and math below statestandards.How will the school evaluate the progressof this goal?Progress will be evaluated based on studentassessment data. Formative data to determinewhich students are on track to meet yearly readingand ELA progress will come from course gradesand the Smarter Balanced Interim AssessmentBlocks with progress benchmarks analyzed threetimes each year.The progress of English learners will be measuredannually using the CELDT, and InterventionSpecialists will use tools available in our ELDcurriculum for formative progress checks threetimes each year.Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201422
Math data will come from teacher‐developedbenchmark assessments and Smarter BalancedInterim Assessment blocks, and will be analyzedthree times each year.Where can a budget plan of the proposedexpenditures for this goal be found?The budget for this goal, including accountinginformation, is shown in detail in the district’sLCAP and our school budget. Summary financialinformation is shown in each row of the table ofactions below.STRATEGIES: 1) Implement a guaranteed and viable curriculum and monitor student progress. 2) Provide time for professional learning through PLCs andrelevant training opportunities. 3) Extend learning time through after school and summer tutoring and programs. 4) Establish Vanden Tutorial CenterAction/DatePerson(s) Responsible1.1 Implement a guaranteedand viable curriculumwhere all students havethe time and opportunityto learn essential contentand skills. Developcommon pacing guidesand instructionalschedules, keyassignments, andassessments. Provideteachers with actionablestudent performancedata. Focus on CA mathstandards in 2015‐16.Principal, PLC facilitators,teacher teams revisingpacing guides1.5 Develop progressmonitoring assessmentsfor English languagedevelopment in order toPrincipal, teachersGuide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 2014Task (Date)1. Implement pacing guides for ELA and math (Fall,2015 and Spring, 2016)2. Administer common assessments, includingSmarter Balanced Interim Assessment Blocks. (Asshown on pacing guides, 2015‐16)3. Provide teachers with actionable studentperformance data through PLC work and use datato group students for instruction and to adjustinstruction to improve results. (Each PLC meeting,2015‐16)4. Pacing guides and assessments will be refined byMay, 2016 in order to allow a focus on ELA for2016‐17.Administer progress monitoring and ELD assessmentaccording to schedules established by teacher teamsand the state. (2015‐16 school year)Cost and Funding Source(Itemize for Each Source)Cost from district SGF budget asshown in the LCAP, approximately 9,130. 2,652 from SGF (2015‐16 U32 3223
provide timely support tostudents not makingadequate progress.1.10 Provide Algebra I Lab,Geometry Lab, andAlgebra 2 Lab classes toprovide concurrentstrategic support forstudents struggling inmath.1.11 Provide English languagedevelopment classes toprovide a minimum of 220minutes per weektargeted instruction forEnglish learners toimprove their mastery ofthe English language (ELDand ELA standards): 2sections (0.40 FTE) atVanden.1.12 Hold regular, facilitatedPLC meeting, English 1,English 2, Algebra 1, andGeometry teachers whereteachers have time toanalyze data, groupstudents according tolearning needs, delvedeeply into the math andELA standards, engage incycles of collaborativeinquiry into best practice,and plan effectiveinstruction for upcominglessons, includinginstruction to closelearning gaps. 1,326Principal, teachersFall 2015 ‐ Spring 20161.0 FTE, 5 sections, 93,802 from 2TeachersFall and Spring 2015‐16Vanden: 37,133 from 2PLC Lead Teachers,TeachersFall and Spring 2015‐16Vanden: 37,620 from ide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201424
1.14 Establish the VandenTutoring Center, tooperate M‐Th, with afocus on math while alsoproviding tutoring in othersubjects; flexible schedulewill meet the uniqueneeds of foster youth aswell as other students.1.18 Provide training foradministrators, PLCfacilitators, and teacherleaders in effective facilitationtechniques to advance teamdevelopment, withcollaborative protocols forimplementing an inquiry cycle,including tools for analyzingstudent work, creatingcommon assessments, anddeveloping student‐centeredinquiries into practice.Administrators, teachers.February 1st 2016 46,577 from 2PLC facilitators, teachers,administratorsFall 2015 ‐ Spring 2016 51,779 from Title II, 1,800 from Educational �6032Summer 2016 52,437 from one time mandated ‐00321.21 Provide a week‐long ELAsummer institute for allsecondary English teachersthat is focused on thestandards in English languagearts and newly adopted ELAinstructional materials.LCAP Goal #2: (LEA GOAL): Engage students in standards-based core curriculum and rich, relevant experiential learning.SCHOOL GOAL: Improve student, teacher and class access to current instructional technology and increase professional development opportunities for its use,and expand CTE course electives offerings.Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201425
What data did you use to form this goal?In addition to the academic performance datafrom Goal #1, we used data about existingprograms to form this goal. We also usedinformation from LCAP consultation withstakeholders, which indicated that art, music, andSTEM education are priorities for our community.What were the findings from the analysis ofthis data?In our analysis, we found a gap between existingprogram offerings and stakeholder requests.How will the school evaluate the progressof this goal?Data will be collected as part of LCAP progressmonitoring on a districtwide and school site basis.Where can a budget plan of the proposedexpenditures for this goal be found?The budget for this goal, including accountinginformation, is shown in detail in the district’sLCAP and our school budget. Summary financialinformation is shown in each row of the table ofactions below.STRATEGIES: 1) Expand on robotics programs. 2) Provide teachers with professional development in technology. 3) Reduce class size in math classes at thisschool.Action/DatePerson(s) ResponsibleTask (Date)2.1 Provide high schoolsummer school for ELD andcredit recoveryAdministrators,Participating teachers.2.2 Provide online learningcourses for credit recoveryEducational Services Staff,CounselorsFall 2015 ‐ Spring 2016 ‐ Summer Session 20162.3 Improve access to UC a‐gcourses, credit recovery,STEM, and the arts byproviding Vanden studentswith the opportunity to takeone additional class beyondthe standard six‐courseschedule by taking a 7th periodAdministrators, CounselorsFall 2015 ‐ Spring 2016Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 2014Summer 2016Cost and Funding Source(Itemize for Each Source) 99,997 from 80 25,000 for Cyber High, andother online learning licensesfrom 0901‐0000‐0‐1110‐1000‐5835‐632‐0032 204,231 for 2.2 FTE (11 classsections) from 4226
2.6 Enhance K‐12 roboticsprograms, including afterschool/competitiveprograms, classes duringthe school day, and theintegration of robotics andprogramming intomathematics instruction.Provide students withinstruction in computerscience, computationalthinking, programming,and control systems.Participating teachers,Educational Servicessupport, PRISM ProjectDirector supportFall 2015 ‐ Spring 2016 35,000 for robotics equipmentand teacher time from ost software available at no cost;for C/C programming softwarefor PRISM schools, 300 for eachparticipating elementary schooland 600 for Golden West ( 2,100total); 2,652 PRISM cost share forCalifornia Science and MathPartnership grant, 4,752 totalfrom LCFF.2.9 Implement BiomedicalSciences CTE programs, withthe Medical Science programbeginning in 2015‐16, andBiotechnology beginning in2016‐17.Administrators, Director ofHR, Participating teachers2015‐ 2016 35,000 from a SpecializedSchools Program planning grantfor Biotechnology and 50,000for Medical Science equipmentfrom the Northern CaliforniaCareer Pathways Alliance grant.In future years, a limited amountof Perkins funding may beavailable for new equipment. 100,000 grant from 2.10 Implement Naviancecollege and career readinesssystem in middle and highschools to help align studentstrengths and interests topost‐secondary goals in orderto improve student outcomes.Administrators, Counselors,Student Services staff andEducational Services staff.2016‐17 13,000 ongoing from LCFFstarting in 2016‐17, with initialtraining in 2015 funded throughthe DoDEA Virtual Learning grant.2.11 Coordinate technologytraining for teachersEducational Services staffcoordination, teacher1. Collaborate with TUTA leadership to survey staff ontechnology training needs. (August, 2015) 30,397 from Title II districtwide,all district teachers invited toGuide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201427
focused on strategies toimprove communicationwith families and to closethe digital divideexperienced by childrenfrom environments lessrich in technology; andtechnology skillssupporting mastery of theCalifornia State Standardswith a particular emphasison enhancing studentmotivation and closinglearning gaps.trainers, participatingteachers2. Develop a planning team which will use the survey datato schedule training. (August and September, 2015)3. Select trainers, advertise opportunities, and hold trainingsessions. (2015‐16 school year)4. Continue to collect data on teacher technology trainingneeds. (March, 2015)attend. Includes compensationfor teachers attending trainingand for trainer planning andpresentation time.LCAP GOAL #3 (LEA GOAL): Provide basic services and manage resources responsibly.SCHOOL GOAL: Ensure all students, teachers and classrooms are equipped to offer students full educational opportunities inside the classroomand out. Provide students necessary curriculum, materials (books) and technology tools needed for student success.What data did you use to form this goal?Williams Act and other legal requirements, classsize regulations, instructional materials needs,data from FIT facilities condition instrument,information about technology needs.What were the findings from the analysis ofthis data?We are compliant with Williams Act requirementsand will maintain that status. There are areas wherethe condition of our facilities can be improved.Teachers report that we need new ELA materials thatare aligned to new California ELA standards.Although we made great strides last year inimproving technology available to students, we havemore needs in this area.How will the school evaluate the progressof this goal?Data will be collected as part of LCAP progressmonitoring on a districtwide and school site basis.Where can a budget plan of the proposedexpenditures for this goal be found?The budget for this goal, including accountinginformation, is shown in detail in the district’sLCAP and our school budget. Summary financialinformation is shown in each row of the table ofactions below.STRATEGIES: 1) Provide students with required instructional materials. 2) Select new ELA materials for 2016‐17 implementation. 3) Purchase technologyfor classrooms.Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201428
Action/DatePerson(s) ResponsibleEducational Services staff,3.6 Select and purchase newteachersELA materials that arealigned to the CAstandards, provide fordifferentiation, andcontain embeddedsupport for Englishlearners. Provideprofessional developmentto supportimplementation. Selectionin early 2016 forimplementation in the2016‐17 school year.3.7 Continue to upgradetechnology.Cost and Funding Source(Itemize for Each Source)Task/DateOrder sample materials, plan and implement review process,teachers recommend materials to Board for approval, ordermaterials, teacher representatives plan summer training(January to June, 2016; with implementation with studentsin August, 2016).Materials and training costs frominstructional materials funds,state one‐time allocations, andprofessional development fundsare estimated for our school. Theexact cost will not be availableuntil after teachers haverecommended a program and theBoard has voted to approve therecommendation.Complete classroom coverage of projection units. Spring2016 1,000.00LCAP GOAL #4 (LEA GOAL): Provide positive, nurturing environments in all schools.SCHOOL GOAL: Improved attendance by students; improved administration of accommodations, Create and manage a complete and functioning safety plan.What data did you use to form this goal?We used attendance and discipline data to formthis goal.Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 2014What were the findings from the analysis ofthis data?Although our school is safe and attendance isgenerally good, we have some areas where we canimprove. There is always room for growth in bullyingreduction, behavior improvement, and support forstudents who struggle with socio‐emotional wellness.How will the school evaluate the progressof this goal?Data will be collected as part of LCAP progressmonitoring on a districtwide and school site basis.Where can a budget plan of the proposedexpenditures for this goal be found?The budget for this goal, including accountinginformation, is shown in detail in the district’sLCAP and our school budget. Summary financialinformation is shown in each row of the table ofactions below.29
STRATEGIES: 1) Continue anti‐bullying and socio‐emotional learning efforts. 2) Provide teachers with training to enhance their ability to support studentswho struggle with behavior.Action/DatePerson(s) ResponsibleCost and Funding Source(Itemize for Each Source)Task/Date4.3Explore cyberbullying curriculaand programs, make selection,and plan implementation(leadership from middle andhigh school AssistantPrincipals).Principals, teachersAllocate 30 minutes per week for socio‐emotional learningto provide time to implement Second Step and to provideinstruction related to implementation of PBIS Tier I.Most cyberbullying curricula areavailable at no charge.4.5Provide a two‐day Kagancooperative learning trainingto support teachers inincreasing their use ofinstructional strategies thatengage all students.Kagan and classroommanagement trainers(district teachers)Kagan training took place in August, 2015. A team to planclassroom management training was formed in September,2015, with training taking place throughout the 2015‐16school year. 37,818 from SGF for 2‐daytraining for the district; ourteachers are invited toparticipate. 12,924 from SGF isbudgeted for trainers andparticipants in classroommanagement training (afterschool).LCAP GOAL #5 (LEA GOAL): Involve parents as partners.SCHOOL GOAL: Improve communication regarding school events; involve parents in decision-making processes and provideinformation regarding school programs.What data did you use to form this goal?We used information about parent participation atschool and on district advisory groups to form thisgoal.What were the findings from the analysis ofthis data?We found that we have many parents involved atschool, but we believe we can increase participationat school and on district advisory groups.How will the school evaluate the progressof this goal?Data will be collected as part of LCAP progressmonitoring on a districtwide and school site basis.Where can a budget plan of the proposedexpenditures for this goal be found?The budget for this goal, including accountinginformation, is shown in detail in the district’sLCAP and our school budget. Summary financialGuide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201430
information is shown in each row of the table ofactions below.STRATEGIES: 1) Provide parents access to educational programs at Vanden HS through Open House Night for parents and students. 2) Ensure our school isrepresented on district advisory groups. 3) Enhance our website for better communication with families.Action/DatePerson(s) ResponsibleTask/DateCost and Funding Source(Itemize for Each Source)5.1 Refer parents to ParentProject.Principal, teachersSpring 2016No cost; provided by localcommunities.5.4 Continue to involve theSuperintendent’s ParentAdvisory Group (SPAG), theFoster Parent SPAG subgroup,and the District EnglishLearner Advisory Group(DELAC) in LCAP development,data analysis, and revision.Principals, participatingteachersFall 2015 ‐ Spring 2016No cost.5.7 Provide translators forfamily‐school communication.PrincipalsFall 2015 ‐ Spring 20165.9 Provide improvedoutreach to parents ofunduplicated students andother families where currentcommunication needsenhancement (personal phonecalls, personal invitations toparticipate in meetings andevents, home visits).Principals, teachersFall 2015 ‐ Spring 2016Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 2014 1,000 from 231
5.11 Provide teachers withtraining in the use ofSchoolwires to developinformative websites forparents and students.Update website withinformation for families.Teachers, office staffGuide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 2014Teacher training in August, 2015. Website updatedthroughout the 2015‐16 school year.About 6,000 for districtelementary schools for trainersand participant compensationfrom the Title I ProfessionalDevelopment set‐aside.32
Form B: Centralized Services for Planned Improvements in Student PerformanceThe following actions and related expenditures support this site program goal and willbe performed as a centralized service. Note: the total amount for each categoricalprogram in Form B must be aligned with the Consolidated Application.School Goal #: Improve academic achievement for English Learners through centralizedservices provided by Educational Services.Actions to be Taken to Reach ThisGoal1Consider all appropriate dimensions(e.g., Teaching and Learning,Staffing, and ProfessionalDevelopment)1. Assess all English Learners todetermine levels of Englishproficiency (CELDT), analyze data,provide feedback to site regardingstudent needs, and purchaseinstructional materials.Start Date2CompletionDateJuly 1,2015throughJune 30,20162. District Language LearnerCoordinator will provide appropriateservices to support English Learnerstudents.EstimatedCostProposed Expenditures1. Purchasesupplementaryinstructional materialsand technology.2. 5% of salary fundedfrom Title III – LEP andImmigrantFundingSource(itemizefor eachsource) 1,100.00 Title III:LEP andImmigrant 5,206.00 (for allactions)Note: Centralized services may include the following direct services: Research-based instructional strategies, curriculum development, school climate,and data disaggregation for instructional staff District-wide staff providing specific services to schools, e.g., English LanguageDevelopment Coordinator, Teachers on Special Assignment, InstructionalCoaches After–School and Summer School programs funded by categorical programs Data analysis services, software, and training for assessment of student progressCentralized services do not include administrative costs.12See Appendix A: Chart of Legal Specifics for the Single Plan for Student Achievement for contentrequired by each program or funding source supporting this goal.List the date an action will be taken, or will begin, and the date it will be completed.Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201433
Form C: Programs Included in this PlanCheck the box for each state and federal program in which the school participates.Enter the amounts allocated for each program in which the school participates and, ifapplicable, check the box indicating that the program’s funds are being consolidated aspart of operating a schoolwide program (SWP). The plan must describe the activities tobe conducted at the school for each of the state and federal programs in which theschool participates. The totals on these pages should match the cost estimates in FormA and the school’s allocation from the ConApp.Note: For many of the funding sources listed below, school districts may be exercisingCategorical Program Provisions options (flexibility) with information available dgetflex.doc.Of the four following options, please select the one that describes this schoolsite: (N/A: this is not a Title I school)This site operates as a targeted assistance school (TAS), not as a schoolwideprogram (SWP).This site operates a SWP but does not consolidate its funds as part ofoperating a SWP.This site operates a SWP and consolidates only applicable federal funds aspart of operating a SWP.This site operates a SWP and consolidates all applicable funds as part ofoperating a SWP.State ProgramsLocal Control Funding Formula (LCFF) – Base GrantPurpose: To provide flexibility in the use of state and localfunds by LEAs and schoolsLCFF – Supplemental GrantPurpose: To provide a supplemental grant equal to 20percent of the adjusted LCFF base grant for targeteddisadvantaged studentsLCFF – Concentration GrantPurpose: To provide an additional concentration grantequal to 50 percent of the adjusted LCFF base grant fortargeted students exceeding 55 percent of an LEA’senrollmentCalifornia School Age Families Education (Carryoveronly)Purpose: Assist expectant and parenting students tosucceed in schoolEconomic Impact Aid/State Compensatory Education(EIA-SCE) (Carryover only)Purpose: Help educationally disadvantaged studentssucceed in the regular programGuide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 2014AllocationConsolidatedin the SWP 34
Economic Impact Aid/Limited English Proficient (EIALEP) (Carryover only)Purpose: Develop fluency in English and academicproficiency of English learners Peer Assistance and Review (Carryover only)Purpose: Assist teachers through coaching and mentoring Professional Development Block Grant (Carryoveronly)Purpose: Attract, train, and retain classroom personnel toimprove student performance in core curriculum areas Pupil Retention Block Grant (Carryover only)Purpose: Prevent students from dropping out of school Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA)Purpose: Funds are available for use in performing variousspecified measures to improve academic instruction andpupil academic achievementSchool and Library Improvement Program Block Grant(Carryover only)Purpose: Improve library and other school programsSchool Safety and Violence Prevention Act (Carryoveronly)Purpose: Increase school safety Tobacco-Use Prevention EducationPurpose: Eliminate tobacco use among students List and Describe Other State or Local Funds (e.g.,Career and Technical Education [CTE], etc.) Total amount of state categorical funds allocated to this school Federal ProgramsTitle I, Part A: AllocationPurpose: To improve basic programs operated by localeducational agencies (LEAs)AllocationConsolidatedin the SWP Title I, Part A: Parental Involvement (ifapplicable under Section 1118[a][3][c] of theElementary and Secondary Education Act)Purpose: Ensure that parents haveinformation they need to make well-informed choices for their children, more effectivelyshare responsibility with their children’sschools, and help schools develop effectiveand successful academic programs (this is areservation from the total Title I, Part Aallocation).Guide to the Single Plan for Student AchievementCalifornia Department of Education, February 201435
For Program Improvement Schools only:Title I, Part A Program Improvement (PI)Professional Development (10 percentminimum reservation from the Title I, Part Areservation for schools in PI Year 1 and 2) Title II, Part A: Improving Teacher QualityPurpose: Improve and increase the number of highlyqualified teachers and principalsTitle III, Part A: Language Instruction for LimitedEnglish-Proficient (LEP) StudentsPurpose: Supplement language instruction to help LEPstudents attain English proficiency and meet academicperformance standardsTitle VI, Part B: Rural Education AchievementProgramPurpose: Provide flexibility in the use of ESEA funds toeligible LEAsFor School Improvement Schools only: SchoolImprovement Grant (SIG)Purpose: to address the needs of schools in improvement,corrective action, and restructuring to improve studentachievement Title III fundsmay not beconsolidated aspart of a SWP3 Other federal funds (list and describe) Other federal funds (list and describe) Other federal funds (list and describe) Total amount of federal categorical funds allocated to this school Total amount of
Vanden High School Vanden High School Site Council Vanden High School 2951 Markeley Ln. Fairfield Ca, 94533 707-437-7333 School Site Council Approval Date: December 16, 2015 . The Single Plan for Student Achievement . (2015‐16 school year) 2,652 from SGF (2015‐16 only). .
Thatcher Mfg. Co. At some point, Travis left the company. For more information about this period, see the section on the Thatcher companies. H.E. Travis, R.A. Travis, L.M. Travis, C.E. Lamberd, and W.B. Cornwell incorporated the Travis Glass Co. at Clarksburg, West Virginia, with a capital of 50,000 in April of 1908 (Commoner and Glassworker .
Cisco Unified Workspace Licensing (CUWL) Cisco Unity FAX Server : Cisco IP Communicator . Cisco Unified Application Server : Cisco Unified Media Engine . Cisco Unified Communications Manager Attendant Console : Cisco Unified Presence . Cisco Emergency Responder : Cisco Unified Personal Communicator . Cisco Unified IP Interactive Voice Response
4 Bumper Guardian 1939 Bentley 4-1/4 litre All WeAther By VAnden PlAs Article by Brian Rohrback Photography by Mindy Rohrback and Jules Heumann Celebrating America’s love affair with the automobile Phone: 253.779.8490 Toll Free: 877.902.8490 Website: www.lemaymuseum.org to be the world’s foremost
Web Scraping for Data Science with Python Seppe vanden Broucke and Bart Baesens – Free Extract – This is a free extract from the book “Web Scraping for Data Science with Python” by Seppe vanden Broucke and Bart Baesens (ISBN-13: 978-1979343787), obtained from webscrapingfor
Caleb Bryce Jorgensen Onate High School Sarah Vanden-Heuvel Rio Rancho High School Shailyn Aubrey Beaty Ruidoso High School Marion Denise Balsamo Taos Academy Charter School Nialo Theodore Kinney Taos High School Macki Janae Bilbrey Texico High School Abigail Kiefer Wilcox The Masters Program Valeria Isabe
Cisco Unified IP Phone 6921, 6941, 6945, and 6961 Administration Guide for Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.6 (SCCP and SIP) OL-24567-01 Understanding How the Cisco Unified IP Phone Interacts with Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express 2-3 Providing Power to the Cisco Unified IP Phone 2-4 Power Guidelines 2-4 Power Outage 2-5
Cisco Unified IP Phone User Guide for Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.5 (SCCP and SIP) iii Contents Your Phone 1 Cisco Unified IP Phone 6921 1 Phone Connections 1 Buttons and Hardware 3 Phone Screen 5 Footstand 6 Higher Viewing Angle 7 Lower Viewing Angle 8 Handset Rest 8 Cisco Unified IP Phone 6941 10 Phone Connections 10 Buttons and Hardware 12
0452 ACCOUNTING 0452/21 Paper 2, maximum raw mark 120 This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have considered the .
