Abdominal Applications Of Ultrasound Fusion Imaging .
European Society of Radiology (ESR) Insights into 019) 10:6Insights into ImagingSTATEMENTOpen AccessAbdominal applications of ultrasoundfusion imaging technique: liver, kidney,and pancreasEuropean Society of Radiology (ESR)AbstractFusion imaging allows exploitation of the strengths of all imaging modalities simultaneously, eliminating or minimizingthe weaknesses of every single modality. Ultrasound (US) fusion imaging provides benefits in real time from both thedynamic information and spatial resolution of the normal US and the high-contrast resolution and wider field of viewof the other imaging methods. US fusion imaging can also be associated with the use of different ultrasoundtechniques such as color Doppler US, elastography, and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), for better localization andcharacterization of lesions. The present paper is focused on US fusion imaging technologies and clinical applicationsdescribing the possible use of this promising imaging technique in the liver, kidney, and pancreatic pathologies.Keywords: Ultrasound, Fusion imaging, Liver, Oncologic imaging, Tumor ablationKey points Fusion imaging helps in the detection andlocalization of lesions with low conspicuity onstandard B-mode US. US fusion imaging can also be associated with theuse of different ultrasound techniques such as colorDoppler US, elastography, and contrast-enhancedUS (CEUS). The current principal use of US fusion imaging isduring hepatic interventional procedures. However,new applications in both intra- and extra-abdominalareas are emerging more and more.IntroductionTaking advantage of various imaging techniques to improve both diagnosis and interventional procedures hasbecome a very common process and is an integral part ofthe work of the modern radiologist. Normally, the association process is a mental act that involves the integrationof information coming from multiple imaging methodssuch as ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT),* Correspondence: communications@myesr.orgVienna, Austriamagnetic resonance (MR), and positron emission tomography (PET).During interventional procedures, this process is referred to as “cognitive fusion” or “visual registration”and consists of the careful studying of an examinationacquired before the procedure, usually CT or MR, andthe subsequent use of US as a guide for the performanceof the procedure, after mental superimposition of thespatial information from the prior study [1]. However,this process can be difficult if the ideal US scanningplane is different to the classical orthogonal CT or MRimage. Moreover, breathing and displacement and deformation of the abdominal structures due to pressurefrom the US probe can affect the process of mentalregistration [2].Thanks to the recent improvements of technology andcomputing power, a real-time computerized fusion ofradiological images has been developed and implemented in modern high-end US machines, to allow synchronous association of US images with one or moreother cross-sectional studies such as CT, MR, or PET,which are instantly reconstructed in the correspondingplane.US guidance is still the guidance method of choice forpercutaneous interventional procedures, as it providesreal-time imaging, does not use ionizing radiation, is The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link tothe Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
European Society of Radiology (ESR) Insights into Imaging(2019) 10:6easily accessible, and is cheap [3]. However, compared toCT and MR, it has lower contrast resolution and a narrower field of view and is affected by the presence of gasand fat. The use of real-time fusion imaging allows exploitation of the strengths of all imaging modalities simultaneously, eliminating or minimizing the weaknessesof every single modality. Therefore, US fusion imagingprovides benefits in real time from both the dynamic information and spatial resolution of the normal US andthe high-contrast resolution and wide field of view ofthe other imaging methods. US fusion imaging can alsobe associated with advanced US imaging techniquessuch as color Doppler US, elastography, and contrastenhanced US (CEUS), for better localization andcharacterization of lesions to be treated [4].Fusion imaging technologyThere are several available spatial tracking methods forUS probes, including optical, image-based, and electromagnetic tracking [1]. The electromagnetic tracking system is the one mostly used for percutaneousinterventional procedures. It comprises a magnetic fieldgenerator, located 20–30 cm from the patient, and a position sensor attached to the probe, or integrated into theneedle. When the position sensor is moved in the magnetic field, an induced electric current is generated,allowing the system to recognize its 3D spatial positionand orientation.The image fusion procedure begins with the importation of data from a previous CT/MR/PET exam. Nextis the planning phase, which consists of several steps tostudy the target lesions and the structures involved inthe procedure and to establish the spatial orientation ofthe patient with respect to the probe. To do this, bothanatomical landmarks and external markers can be used.Page 2 of 6Using anatomical landmarks alone, synchronization ofthe US images with CT/MR must be manual and requires the identification of motionless anatomical structures on the US (e.g., vessels, cysts, calcifications) thatare then manually matched on the tomographic exam[5]. If external markers are used, placed on the patient’sskin during the CT acquisition phase, the image coupling process will be automatic, faster, and more reliable.When image matching is complete, real-time US andCT/MR/PET images are arranged side-by-side or overlaidon the US monitor, displaying the same plane and movingsynchronously together (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4). Thus, fusionimaging helps in the detection and localization of lesionswith low conspicuity on standard B-mode US [4]. It is alsopossible to indicate the desired needle route, which canthen be followed easily during the procedure.There are many applications of fusion imaging, butgiven the relative novelty of the technology, most arestill under investigation and require additional clinicaltrials. The current principal use of US fusion imaging isduring hepatic interventional procedures. However, newapplications in both intra- and extra-abdominal areasare emerging more and more.LiverUS is the method of choice for the interventional percutaneous approach to hepatic lesions. Its advantages inthis area are manifold, both for diagnostic proceduressuch as biopsies and therapeutic procedures such as ablations. Firstly, it is a real-time method, allowing the liverto be constantly followed during respiratory movements.It allows identification of the most appropriate plane forneedle insertion; this does not have to be an axial planebut can be oriented at will according to the circumstances. Furthermore, the use of color Doppler USFig. 1 CT-US fusion imaging. Treatment of very small hypervascular nodular recurrence of HCC adjacent to a previously ablated area
European Society of Radiology (ESR) Insights into Imaging(2019) 10:6Page 3 of 6Fig. 2 MR-US fusion imaging. Biopsy of very small liver nodule, hypointense on the late hepatobiliary phase of MR, with a final diagnosisof a metastatic lesionallows us to identify major vascular structures (e.g., hepatic arteries, portal vein branches, hepatic veins) whichshould preferably be avoided during needle insertion. Finally, fused CEUS can be useful to increase the conspicuity of lesions to be treated and vascular structures tobe avoided [3].However, US has some weaknesses which can affect thesuccess of the procedure. Firstly, it is an operatordependent method and has a lower contrast resolutionthan CT and MR. Air contained in the hollow organs or inthe biliary tract (in the case of pneumobilia) may limit theavailable acoustic window. Even air in the lung parenchyma, bones, and calcification (e.g., gallstones) interfereswith the US. Furthermore, lesions and their margins arenot always clearly visible on the B-mode US, even afterthe administration of contrast medium, particularly in theinhomogeneous and cirrhotic livers. The most commoncauses of mistargeting during US-guided radiofrequencyablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) areconfusion with cirrhotic nodules, poor conspicuity of thetarget lesion, and poor acoustic window [2]. Lesions located deep in the most distal sectors of the acoustic conecan be blurred and difficult to identify. Using fusion imaging technologies, it is possible to place beside or overlayupon the US image images from modalities that do notsuffer from all these problems, such as CT and MR. In thisFig. 3 CT-US fusion imaging. Biopsy of pancreatic neck carcinoma, hypodense on CT and hypoechoic on the US
European Society of Radiology (ESR) Insights into Imaging(2019) 10:6Page 4 of 6Fig. 4 CT-US fusion imaging. Radiofrequency ablation planning of pancreatic neck carcinoma, hypodense on CT and hypoechoic on Doppler US(performed to highlight the peripancreatic vessels)way, radiologists can exploit all the strengths of the different methods in a single session, increasing the safety,speed, and results of the procedure and improving theconfidence of the operator.Some hepatic tumors which can be visualized byCT or MR cannot be seen on the US due to theirsmall size, their location, or their echogenicity. Inthese cases, fusion imaging has been proven to enhance the conspicuity of HCC nodules and to increase the feasibility of percutaneous RFA of HCCsnot visible on the conventional US [4–6]. If HCCsare still not visible after fusion imaging, anatomiclandmarks surrounding the lesions can be used forcorrect needle placement [5]. Thus, with the use offusion imaging, a larger population can benefit fromUS-guided ablation procedures instead of undergoingCT-guided ablation or major surgery, which are moreharmful and expensive techniques.Fusion imaging can also reduce false-positive lesiondetection during US-guided RFA and consistently improve the detection of HCCs, especially when theseare smaller than 2 cm [7]. The ability of fusion imaging to reduce false positives also applies to theevaluation of local tumor progression after RFA andTACE [8].KidneyUS is the usual first-line imaging method for the assessment of the kidneys. Thanks to their retroperitoneal location, in the lumbar region below the rib cage, anexcellent acoustic window is generally available, without the interposition of air-containing structures orbones. Most renal lesions are incidental findings andare frequently asymptomatic. The main utility of US isthe precise discrimination of solid lesions from cysticlesions. However, with only B-mode US, it can often bedifficult to distinguish between simple and complex orneoplastic cysts. Even in the case of solid renal lesions,there may be difficulties with the B-mode US in termsof detection and characterization. For these reasons, itis often necessary to exploit second-level methods suchas CT and MR for the study of renal lesions. CEUS isalso emerging as a useful technique to study cystic lesions and their related septal vascularization, as well assolid lesions, during ablative procedures [9, 10]. Ininterventional procedures, fusion imaging can beextremely helpful in identifying the renal lesions to betreated, especially those with poor conspicuity onnormal B-mode US. The combination of CEUS with fusion imaging is effective in the classification of indeterminate renal lesions and can also improve thecharacterization of cystic lesions [11]. Therefore, in thecase of tumors, the use of CEUS with fusion imaging allows minimization of the risk of treating benign lesionssurgically or the risk of missing cancer [12].When targeting renal lesions during a percutaneousprocedure, fusion imaging can help in recognizing themost appropriate part of the lesion to biopsy (especiallyfor cystic lesions) or the best position to place the electrodes for ablation. In the case of multiple lesions, fusionimaging allows us to distinguish the specific lesion to betreated with greater confidence, allowing the margins ofthe lesion to be more precisely distinguished. Furthermore, the use of fusion imaging is valuable in determining the correct path for the needle, avoiding harm tostructures such as the renal vessels, renal pelvis, adrenalglands, spleen, and colon.However, the use of fusion imaging in renal disease isstill under investigation in the literature and requiresfurther clinical studies.
European Society of Radiology (ESR) Insights into Imaging(2019) 10:6PancreasWhen used by experienced operators, US allows thepancreas to be studied in excellent detail. As US is areal-time method, radiation-free, and can be performedat the bedside, it is an important aid for guiding pancreatic percutaneous procedures such as ablation of lesionsor drain positioning [13]. However, since the pancreas isa retroperitoneal organ, it may be difficult to visualize itentirely if there is an interposition of hollow organs; thisis particularly true with respect to the tail, sometimescalled the “blind area” of the pancreas. CT and MR, onthe other hand, are superior to US in permitting fullvisualization of the pancreas, providing clearer demonstration of its relationships to the delicate surroundingstructures, lying behind the colon and stomach and inclose contact with the duodenum, the portal vein andmajor arterial structures such as the aorta, the celiacaxis, and the superior mesenteric artery. For this reason,fusion imaging can be an extremely useful tool torecognize and avoid damaging these structures duringUS-guided percutaneous procedures. It has been shownthat performing drainage of pancreatic necrosis usingUS fusion imaging is superior to classic B-mode US interms of safety, efficiency, and hospitalization length andcosts [14]. US fusion imaging also allows bettervisualization of the “blind area” when it is not clearlyshown with normal B-mode US [15].Clinical indications for fusion imaging of the pancreascan therefore be summarized as guidance for biopsy anddrainage and percutaneous treatment of pancreatic cancer such as radiofrequency ablation or irreversibleelectroporation.Even in these circumstances, the use of fusion imagingin pancreatic disease is not well-described in the literature and requires further clinical studies to confirm itsvalidity.Limitations of fusion imagingOne of the most challenging limitations affecting US fusion imaging is the risk of mistargeting a lesion. In hepatic ablation, mistargeting normally occurs in about 2%of cases and is principally due to the small size of the lesion or confusion with the surrounding pseudo lesionssuch as regenerative nodules. Lesions located in subcapsular or subphrenic areas, as well as lesions with poorconspicuity, can also be missed [9].Another limitation of US fusion imaging is the need tosynchronize a static image from a CT or MR study withthe breathing motion and changing position of the patient, in particular when approaching a subdiaphragmatic organ such as the liver [10]. During the breathingcycle, the movement of the liver is complex and includestranslations and rotations. During breathing, the peripheral regions of the liver move more widely than thePage 5 of 6central ones, which are more fixed in position by thepresence of the hepatic pedicle. In the periphery of theliver, there are also fewer anatomical landmarks such asthe vessels. For this reason, registration error during fusion imaging especially affects the peripheral portions ofthe liver and patients with large respiratory movements[11]. Although retroperitoneal, registration errors mayalso affect the kidney, as it is a mobile organ subject tomovement with breathing. Registration errors occurwhen the respiratory phase of the reference examinationis different from that during image synchronization.Therefore, MR, which is normally performed in expiration (as opposed to CT, usually performed during inspiration), is more comparable with the patient’sbreathing status during the interventional procedure andis therefore less associated with registration errors [12].The pancreas is a less mobile organ during breathingand is therefore theoretically less affected by registrationerrors. However, visualization of the pancreas often requires that pressure be applied with the probe on theupper abdomen to displace the overlying hollow organs.This can change the relationships between abdominalstructures, which can affect the matching between theUS and CT/MR images.Finally, while fusion imaging is increasingly proving tobe a promising technology, further randomized clinicaltrials are needed to define its presumed superiority overcognitive fusion during image-guided procedures.ConclusionUS fusion imaging is a relatively novel technique in theabdominal US panorama. Its ability to exploit all thestrengths of multiple imaging methods used together inreal time makes it a tool of great value when performinga percutaneous procedure. Increasing the confidence ofthe operator, it allows better visualization of the abdominal structures and more precise planning of needlepaths, avoiding delicate structures, minimizing radiationexposure, and so increasing safety and efficiency (anddecreasing cost) of these procedures.AcknowledgementsThis paper was prepared by Mirko D’Onofrio (Member of the ESR UltrasoundSubcommittee) and Alessandro Beleù, Department of Radiology, G.B. RossiHospital – University of Verona, Verona, Italy – with the contribution fromSubcommittee Members Diana Gaitini, Jean-Michel Corréas and Adrian Brady(Chair of the ESR Quality, Safety and Standards Committee). The paper wassupported by the ESR Ultrasound Subcommittee led by Dirk Clevert (Chair ofthe ESR Ultrasound Subcommittee).It was approved by the ESR Executive Council on November 15, 2018.Authors’ contributionsAll authors read and approved the final manuscript.Publisher’s NoteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in publishedmaps and institutional affiliations.
European Society of Radiology (ESR) Insights into Imaging(2019) 10:6Received: 12 December 2018 Accepted: 3 January 2019References1. Maybody M, Stevenson C, Solomon SB (2013) Overview of navigation systemsin image-guided interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 16(3):136–143.2. Lee MW, Lim HK, Kim YJ et al (2011) Percutaneous sonographically guidedradio frequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: causes ofmistargeting and factors affecting the feasibility of a second ablationsession. J Ultrasound Med 30(5):607–615.3. Lorentzen T, Nolsøe CP, Ewertsen C et al (2015) EFSUMB guidelines oninterventional ultrasound (INVUS), part I. general aspects (long version).Ultraschall Med 36(5):E1-14.4. Lee MW (2014) Fusion imaging of real-time ultrasonography with CT or MRIfor hepatic intervention. Ultrasonography 33(4):227–239.5. Song KD, Lee MW, Rhim H, Cha DI, Chong Y, Lim HK (2013) Fusion imagingguided radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinomas not visible onconventional ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(5):1141–1147.6. Mauri G, Cova L, De Beni S et al (2015) Real-time US-CT/MRI image fusionfor guidance of thermal ablation of liver tumors undetectable with US:results in 295 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38(1):143–151.7. Lee MW, Rhim H, Cha DI, Kim YJ, Lim HK (2013) Planning US forpercutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinomas(1–3 cm): value of fusion imaging with conventional US and CT/MR images.J Vasc Interv Radi
Keywords: Ultrasound, Fusion imaging, Liver, Oncologic imaging, Tumor ablation Key points Fusion imaging helps in the detection and localization of lesions with low conspicuity on standard B-mode US. US fusion imaging can also be associated with the use of different ultrasound techniques such as color Doppler US, elastography, and contrast-enhanced
Three-dimensional ultrasound, may be acquired and displayed over time. This is variously known as 4D ultrasound, real-time 3D ultrasound, and live 3D ultrasound. When used in conjunction with 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound has added diagnostic and clinical value for select indications and circumstances in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound.
Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine Arterial spectral Doppler waveforms Tumour angiogenesis New technologies in ultrasound Fetal ultrasound video compression algorithm Quality of compressed ultrasound video ISSN 1441-6891 ULTRASOUND BULLETIN ASUM Multidisciplinary Ultrasound Workshop 2006 Gold Coast 24-25 March 2006
8. Install VMware Fusion by launching the “Install VMware Fusion.pkg”. 9. Register VMware Fusion when prompted and configure preferences as necessary. 10. Quit VMware Fusion. Create a VMware Fusion Virtual Machine package with Composer 1. Launch VMware Fusion from /Applications. 2. Cre
THE ROLE OF OBSTETRIC ULTRASOUND IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE AT A SECONDARY HOSPITAL IN SOUTH AFRICA. . Antenatal Ultrasound. 9 3. Routine Ultrasound. 9 Section II. _High Risk Pregnancies , 12 . Clinical Indications for Ultrasound Scans .49 Chart 9: Centres From Where the Patients came to Ultrasound 50 .
2 FUSION SOFTWARE USER GUIDE - V17 FUSION-CAPT FOR FUSION FX7, SL7, PULSE 7, SOLO 7S, SOLO 7X EVOLUTION-CAPT FOR FUSION FX6, SL6, PULSE 6, SOLO 6S, SOLO 6X Thank you Dear Customer, On behalf of Vilber Lourmat, we would like to thank you for choosing the Fusion imaging system. In order to learn the capabilities of your Fusion imaging system, we kindly ask
Accessible Fusion Brochure PDF. Accessible Fusion Brochure PDF. STANDARD FEATURES . FUSION / FUSION HYBRID / FUSION ENERGI. STANDARD FEATURES . GASOLINE ENGINE MODELS. . 2019 Fusion ford.com. 1 After your trial period ends, SiriusXM audio and data services each require a subscription sold separately, or as a package, by SiriusXM Radio Inc. .
Recheck and if 125 mL resume feeding. Hold tube feeding for voming, abdominal pain, or significant abdominal distension. Post-Implementaon Cohort Perform abdominal exam every 4 hours. Hold tube feeding for voming, abdominal pain, significant abdominal, distension or 4 stools per day
AAT Advanced Diploma in Accounting Synoptic Assessment – SAMS – Assessment book 2 Notes for students and training providers This is a sample assessment and mark scheme which is reflective of the question types, depth of content coverage, the level of demand, duration and mark allocation of tasks that will be in the live assessment It is not designed to be used on its own to determine .
