In This Issue: Salvation Without A Savior?

2y ago
29 Views
2 Downloads
2.18 MB
20 Pages
Last View : 13d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Noelle Grant
Transcription

Evangelical Interfaith DialogueFA L L 2 0 1 0 IS S U E 1 . 4 Kurt SimonsonIn This Issue:INTRODUCTION page 1THIS ISSUE AT A GLANCE page 2CHRISTOPHER J. H. WRIGHTSalvation BelongsTo Our Godpage 3ROBERT L. GALLAGHERSalvation: Narrow WayBut Broad Missionpage 10SalvationWithout aSavior?INTRODUCTION: CORY WILLSONJAMES T. BUTLERDialogue as Witnessto the Fullness of OurSalvationpage 11CRAIG L. BLOMBERGIs Wright Right with theLatter-Day Saints?page 13VELI-MATTI KÄRKKÄINENMission to Religions inthe “Post-Edinburghs”Worldpage 16BOOK REVIEW: CARRIE GRAHAMFriendship at theMargins: DiscoveringMutuality in Service andMissionpage 15MORE INSIDE Salvation is a central topic in Christian theology. Our beliefs about the nature ofbiblical salvation and the means by which it is attained are critically important to theChristian faith; knowing why these beliefs are so important should be a prerequisitefor Evangelicals entering into interfaith dialogue. Such an understanding is thebeginning point for knowing what beliefs we need to hold resolutely as we engage indialogue with religious “others.”Underlying every approach to interfaith dialogue are essential questions that mustbe examined if that approach is to be faithful to Christ and his gospel. Broadly, thesequestions include the nature of truth, the nature and dynamics of revelation, the workof God outside of the Church in the world at large, and a range of other issues. Onein particular that causes divisions especially among Evangelicals is whether thereis revelation in other religions and if this revelation is in any sense salvific. It is thisquestion, for example, that drives the heated debate between inclusivists, exclusivists,and pluralists. How should we think about those who have never heard the gospelof Jesus, but nevertheless attempt to live in light of some form of knowledge of Godrevealed through creation? How we answer this question, and more importantly howwe frame it, needs to be done with careful theological reflection; for how we frame itand accordingly answer it sets the agenda for our dialogue. That being said, however,we must always begin with a biblical understanding of salvation and not assume thatsalvation is understood in the same way among other religions.In this issue, Dr. Christopher J. H. Wright, the international director of LanghamPartnership International, presents a biblical theology of salvation seen through thelens of new creation and the eschatological consummation of salvation. EIFDEVANGELICAL INTERFAITH DIALOGUE FALL 2010 ISSUE 1.4 WWW.EVANGELICALINTERFAITH.COMpage 1

THIS ISSUE AT A GLANCE:pageFA L L 2 010 I SSUE 1. 4FOUNDING BOARDCarrie GrahamMatthew KrabillMelody WachsmuthCory WillsonEDITORCory WillsonCONSULTING EDITORSMatthew KrabillMelody WachsmuthDonald WestbrookCONSULTANTSDr. Martin AccadDr. Erin Dufault-HunterDr. Veli-Matti KärkkäinenDr. C. Douglas McConnellDr. Richard J. MouwGRAPHIC CONSULTANT/PHOTOGRAPHYKurt SimonsonKurt Simonson is an artist and assistant professor ofPhotography in the art department at Biola University.For more information about Simonson and his work, visitwww.kurtsimonson.com. All photographs are copyrightedand used by permission of the photographer(s). All rightsare reserved; any further use of the photographs, in anyform, requires permission of the photographer(s).VISION STATEMENTThis journal seeks to create space for Evangelicalscholars and practitioners to dialogue about thedynamics, challenges, practices, and theologysurrounding interfaith work, while remaining faithfulto the gospel of Jesus and his mission for his Church.AIMS OF THIS JOURNALIn light of our commitment to the authority ofScripture and the gospel of Jesus Christ, this journalseeks to: ground interfaith dialogue in the missio Dei create space for pioneering Evangelicalapproaches to interfaith dialogue, drawing ona robust biblical, theological, missiological, andpsychological foundation wrestle together publicly and as a communityon the challenges, opportunities, and dangers ofengaging in interfaith dialogue begin to heal the divisions within Evangelicalismbetween mission and dialogue by articulating themissiological guidelines for dialogue foster discussion on interfaith issues betweenfaculty, students, and practitioners fromEvangelical traditions across the globeViews expressed in Evangelical Interfaith Dialogue do not necessarily reflect the opinionsof the editors or the seminary. Produced in limited quantities. Copyright 2010 FullerTheological Seminary.page 2 3CHRISTOPHER J. H. WRIGHT uses theeschatological text Revelation 7:9-10 toexplore a biblical theology of salvation. Although the question of interfaith dialogueis not directly dealt with at length, hisdiscussion of the nature and means of salvation has tremendous implications for interfaith dialogue. Readers will find Wright’sarticle helpful in wrestling with thequestion, if salvation is found exclusivelyin Christ, why should we engage in interfaith dialogue? Searching for salvationthrough a religion—whether Christian ornot—reveals several misconceptions aboutsalvation and how it is obtained. From thisunderstanding of salvation a discussionof the aims and expectations of interfaithdialogue can be further explored.Responses to Dr. Wright:page10ROBERT L. GALLAGHER offers reflectionson what Luke and Acts teach us about theexclusivity of salvation offered to us by Godin Christ: that it is part of God's inclusivemission to extend the invitation to salvationto all peoples. He explains how salvationis a gift that is God’s alone to offer, butthat this offer is to be actively extended topeople in every part of the world.page11JAMES T. BUTLER explores how ourinteractions with people of other religionscan help us see dimensions of God’ssalvation that are often overlooked inScripture. Affirming that salvation is theproperty of God alone and that “all truthis God’s truth,” he notes that Christianscan be equipped to see the holistic natureof the salvation offered to us by our God.page13CRAIG L. BLOMBERG discusses why it isless threatening to dialogue with peoplefrom radically different religious traditions than those that are similar to ourown. Counterintuitive as it may seem, inthe arena of interfaith dialogue, similaritycan breed more hostility than difference.In this article, Blomberg uses ChristopherJ. H. Wright’s article as a lens to reflecton his decade-long dialogue with Latterday Saint scholars.Global Discussionson Interfaith Dialogue:page16Any effort to move forward without acritical understanding of the past isalways dangerous. This is especially truewith the history of Christian experienceand theology of other religions. VELIMATTI KÄRKKÄINEN, a participant inthe Edinburgh 2010 World MissionaryConference, reflects on his experiencesin light of the first conference in 1910 andthe many changes that have transpiredin the Church and the world since. Thediscussions on interfaith dialogue andtheology of religions at Edinburgh 2010will undoubtedly have considerableimpact within the Christian communityaround the world in the years to come.page17DONALD WESTBROOK discusses theformative role that the Lausanne Movement has played in the Evangelical tradition around the world. Understanding thehistory of this movement and its mostrecent gathering in Cape Town, South Africa, in October 2010, provides a windowinto the many changes underway in evangelism across continents and cultures.Praxis:page18JOSHUA MUTHALALI, an internationalstudent at Fuller Theological Seminary,reflects on the challenges he faces inhelping his church community mature intheir interactions with people of otherfaiths. Muthalali’s story captures the common experience of Christians who engagein interfaith dialogue and often find itdifficult to speak to those within their owntradition about why and how Christiansshould be involved in such activities.seeing DIFFERENTLYThroughout this journal, we feature photographs by Kurt Simonson that flow fromhis exploration of the intersection of the sacred and the mundane. On the back cover,a diptych work is featured with a specific artist statement to address its conceptualcontent. Meanwhile, the images found within the journal are loosely connected to theideas in that statement, though they operate differently. Perhaps it could be said thatin some of these single images, the exchanges described in the artist statement on thefinal page are occurring within a single frame, rather than in a diptych format, invitingthe viewer to consider their confounding relationships in an even more complex manner.EVANGELICAL INTERFAITH DIALOGUE FALL 2010 ISSUE 1.4WWW.EVANGELICALINTERFAITH.COM

FEATURED ARTICLESalvation BelongsTo Our GodBY CHRISTOPHER J. H. WRIGHT, International Director, Langham Partnership InternationalAfter this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation,tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing whiterobes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice:“Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb!” –Revelation 7:9-10 (NIV)IntroductionMartin Luther is reputed to have said that we read theBible forwards, but we understand the Bible backwards.That is, the whole canon only makes complete sensein the light of the great ultimate revelation of thenew creation in its final book. Accordingly, it seemsappropriate in our exploration of the great biblicaltheme of salvation to start at the end with the climacticstatement quoted above. The doxology sung by thewhole of redeemed humanity condenses into a fewpregnant phrases the whole biblical doctrine ofsalvation and will serve admirably as a programmatictext for our survey.1. Salvation Is the Property of God:“Salvation belongs to God.”This is the theocentric dimension of biblical salvation.The categorical affirmation that salvation is the propertyof God excludes human initiation or achievement byany means, including religion.The form of the words in the doxology is veryHebraic: literally, “to our God is salvation.” It is thesame structure for expressing a possessive relationshipas the opening words of Psalm 24, “To Yahweh theearth and all its fullness”—that is, the earth belongs toYahweh; it is his property. Similarly then, salvation is areality that belongs to God, not to us.Salvation, as biblically understood, is not at humandisposal or a matter of human achievement. We do notown it, or control it. We cannot dispense it to others, stillless sell it or offer it on our terms. We cannot destroyor threaten it for those to whom God has granted it,nor can we decide who gets to have it, or not. Salvationbelongs to God, initiated by his grace, achieved by hispower, offered on his terms, secured by his promises,guaranteed by his sovereignty. God is the subject of theact of saving us. He is not the object of our attempts togain salvation. Salvation is the result of no action ofours other than that of asking and accepting it from God.In the Bible there are, of course, many instanceswhen salvation comes through human agency, buteven then the source of the power to save still lies withGod. The judges all illustrate this principle. Gideon istold to go and deliver Israel—he would be the deliverer,but only because God would be with him (Judg. 6:1415). But when he assembles his army, it is systematicallydecimated before he can begin his campaign, explicitlyto ensure that God is seen to be the true source of thevictory, not the size of the army (Judg. 7:2, 7; contrastthe ironic refusal of God to save them in Judg. 10:11-14).Similarly, David’s victory over Goliath shows the worldwho really is the God with power to save (1 Sam. 17:47).Only Yahweh, then, can save. This is the messageespecially of the prophets. Yahweh saves when nobodyelse can or does (Isa. 59:15-17). Astrologers cannot save(Isa. 47:13-14). Kings, mere mortals that they are, cannotsave (Psa. 146:3). Military power cannot save (Psa. 33:1617). And other gods are most commonly characterizedas contemptibly unable to save (Isa. 43:11-13; 45:2021). So salvation is clearly not something you can “get”from religion considered as a set of human activitiesor aspirations. The very question sometimes asked inthe debate over other faiths, “Is there salvation in otherreligions?” is highly misleading, since it embodies a falseEDITORIAL NOTE:This paper byDr. Christopher J. H.Wright was developed infurther detail with a morecomprehensive treatmentof salvation in the biblicaltexts in his book SalvationBelongs to Our God:Celebrating the Bible’sCentral Story, publishedby InterVarsity Press in2007. We are grateful toDr. Wright for grantingpermission to reproducethis essay.In order to bring this essay into dialogue with contemporary and historic views on interfaith discourse, quotations from respectedtheologians as well as other writings of Christopher J. H. Wright have been inserted as asides throughout this article.EVANGELICAL INTERFAITH DIALOGUE FALL 2010 ISSUE 1.4 WWW.EVANGELICALINTERFAITH.COMpage 3

premise—namely, that salvation is something you getfrom any religion. But according to the Bible, religionsaves nobody. God does. Salvation belongs to God andis not manipulated out of him by religious activity.We shall look at New Testament material in moredepth later, but on this opening point it is worth notingthat the word “savior” is applied to God eight times and toJesus 16 times in the New Testament, and to nobody elseat all, ever. And yet the term soter was a fairly commonterm in the classical world, applied to both humankings and military deliverers, and also to the great godsand heroes of mythology. But not in New TestamentChristianity. Salvation belongs to our God . . . and to theLamb. Nobody else merits even the vocabulary.2. Salvation as the Identity of God:“Salvation belongs to our God.”The Particularity of the Biblical, Saving GodThe affirmation in the doxology of the redeemed fromevery nation is very specific and particular: “Salvationbelongs to our God.” This is not some bland genericlinkage between salvation and deity as an abstracttranscendent concept. It is this God, the biblical God,the God of revelation and redemption, Yahweh the Godof Israel, the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,the God who is not ashamed to be called “our God.”“The Christian does not meet his partner in dialogue as one who possessesthe truth and the holiness of God, but as one who bears witness to the truthand holiness which are God’s judgment on him, and who is ready to hear thatjudgment spoken through the lips and life of his partner of another faith. The purpose of dialogue for the Christian is obedient witness to JesusChrist who is not the property of the Church but the Lord of the Church andof all men, and who is glorified as the living Holy Spirit takes all that theFather has given to man—all men of every creed and culture—and declaresit to the Church as that which belongs to Christ as Lord. In this encounterthe Church is changed and the world is changed and Christ is glorified.”Lesslie Newbigin, “The Basis, Purpose and Manner of Inter-Faith Dialogue,” ScottishJournal of Theology 30 (1977): 3.This is the God to whom salvation belongs. This indeedis the God who is defined above all else precisely by hissaving ability and activity.“You were shown these things,” said Moses,speaking of the great redemptive act of the Exodus andrevelatory act of Sinai, not so that you would know thatthere is only one God, but “so that you might knowthat Yahweh is God in heaven above and on the earthbeneath; there is no other” (Deut. 4:35, 39). “Salvation isfound in no one else [than Jesus], for there is no othername under heaven given to men by which we must besaved,” said Peter (Acts 4:12). The point of God’s greatsaving acts is to demonstrate not just monotheism, ora theocentric worldview, but the identity of the truepage 4 and living God as the one and only source of salvation.Salvation is the work of this God, revealed as Yahweh,incarnated as Jesus of Nazareth—and of no other.This affirmation underlies the constant importancein the Bible of knowing God—that is, not just knowingthat some god exists, or even merely knowing truthsor statements about God, but precisely in knowingwho God is, or who truly is God. And the true God hasproved his identity supremely through his power tosave. Israel knew Yahweh alone because he alone hadsaved them. “I am the Lord your God, who broughtyou out of Egypt. You know no God but me, no Saviorexcept me” (Hos. 13:4). “This is eternal life [which inJohn is synonymous with salvation]: that they mayknow you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whomyou have sent” (John 17:3 NIV).The Impotence of Other GodsIn sharp contrast, other gods are distinguished fromYahweh most commonly by the fact that they cannotsave. The early encounters between Yahweh and Baalin the book of Judges bring this out sometimes withcomic intent. Gideon’s father’s reply to the men of histown who came to lynch Gideon for demolishing thealtar of Baal is wonderfully sarcastic. If Baal is a god,ought he not be able to save his own altar? Or is he soweak that he actually needs this mob to “save” him?What kind of god needs to be saved by humans whenthe whole point of being a god is to be able to save yourworshippers? Are we missing something here, citizens?(Judg. 6:31).Similar sarcasm and scorn is poured on the greatimperial gods of Babylon at a much later stage of Israel’shistory (Isa. 46:1-7). Bel and Nebo are caricatured asstooping down from their heavenly residence becausetheir idols are being carted off by their worshippers,struggling under the burden as they flee from theirfallen city. What kind of god is it that cannot save evenits own idol, let alone its worshippers? What strangereversal is it that makes the very worshippers find theirgod is now a burden they have to carry, rather than astrong champion who will carry them in their hour ofneed (as Israel’s God had done from the dawn of theirhistory, vv. 3-4)? No, the very nature of these false godsis that “though one cries out to it, it does not answer; itcannot save” (v. 7 NIV). This is as true at the individual,domestic level as it is in grand imperial politics. Thedeluded worshipper of an idol seems blinded to thesham and impotence of the god he has created forhimself as a byproduct of heating and eating. He callsto it for salvation, but that is the one thing it can neverdeliver (Isa. 44:9-20, esp. 17, 20). False gods never fail tofail. The trouble is, we never fail to forget this and go onputting our faith in them.3. Salvation and the Story of God:“Salvation belongs to our God.”As well as the particularity of the expression “our God,”EVANGELICAL INTERFAITH DIALOGUE FALL 2010 ISSUE 1.4WWW.EVANGELICALINTERFAITH.COM

Kurt Simonsonseeing DIFFERENTLYthere is also its covenantal resonance. The phrase of God. But inherent in the Abrahamic covenant was“The Lord our God” is the most common summation the further promise of blessing to the nations. Indeed,of covenantal faith in the Old Testament. “You have this is the bottom line of the Abrahamic covenant—declared this day that the Lord is your God. . . . and textually and theologically. “In/through you all thethe Lord has declared this day that you are his people” families/nations of the earth will find blessing” (Gen.(Deut. 26:17-18; cf. 6:4-5). Salvation, then, belongs to the 12:3, etc.). Israel would be the people of this saving,covenantal God; not just to this God, but to the God of covenantal God whom they would call “our God”—this people and this history, to our God. Biblical salvation precisely for the sake of other nations who did not yethas to be understood in the context of God’s covenantal know him as such. The election and salvation of Israelrelationship to his people, Old and New Testament. was ultimately for the blessing of the nations.This covenantal, historical, relational dimension ofSuch considerations clearly inspired the composersalvation generates a number of other features worthy of Psalm 67, who turns the Aaronic blessing into aof note.prayer—“May God be gracious to us and bless us andmake his face shine upon us”—and then immediatelyEcclesiologicalturns it outwards in a remarkable “missional” prayerGod’s salvation enters history through a community. for the blessing and salvation of the world: “that yourGod’s covenant with Abraham in Genesis 12:1-3 and ways may be known on earth, your salvation among allthe following narratives is set against the backdrop of nations” (NIV).global human sin and rebellion, which climaxed inPossibly the most startling text in the Old Testamentthe great failed attempt at self-salvation, the tower of to portray the implications of such a theology of salvationBabel. In a world in which the human race now lives for the nations (among many that point towards thatin division and strife upon an earth that strains underGod’s curse, God initiates a redemptive covenant ofblessing. Blessing is a key word in Genesis—the promiseand mandate of creation in chapters 1 and 2; the echoof that creation after the flood (9:1); and now again thepromise of God to and through Abraham. Salvationmeans blessing on a particular people and blessingthrough a particular people.The nation that would come from Abraham, then,would be a people who would know the saving blessing the very nature of the people of God—Israel—is redefined to include the nationsin the eschatological fulfillment of thecovenant that brought them into existence.EVANGELICAL INTERFAITH DIALOGUE FALL 2010 ISSUE 1.4 WWW.EVANGELICALINTERFAITH.COMpage 5

great goal) is Isaiah 19:19-25. Following a prophecy inwhich the prophet declares an oracle of comprehensivedivine judgment upon the Egypt of his own day, helooks to the eschatological future and dares to envisagea day when, in a gloriously ironic reversal of exodushistory, the Egyptians will cry out to Yahweh fromtheir oppressors and he will send them “a savior anddefender, and he will rescue them” (v. 20). Furthermore,not only can God offer salvation to his former enemies,he can turn them into the vehicle of blessing to others.In that day, Israel will be the third, along withEgypt and Assyria, a blessing on the earth. The LordAlmighty will bless them, saying, “Blessed be Egyptmy people, Assyria my handiwork, and Israel myinheritance” (vv. 24-25).“It is this fundamental fact about the Christian gospel—that it is good news, nota good idea; that it is the declaration of historical events by which God hasintervened to save us from our sin—which exposes the inadequacy of all otherreligions. There is no salvation in them, not because they have nothing incommon with Christianity in their beliefs (some do), but because they do notrecount these events and therefore do not put people in touch with what Godhas already done to save them.”Christopher J. H. Wright, The Uniqueness of Jesus (Greenville: Monarch Books,2001), 64.The beneficiaries of Abrahamic blessing becomethe agents of it to others. Thus the very nature of thepeople of God—Israel—is redefined to include thenations in the eschatological fulfillment of the covenantthat brought them into existence. The blessing ofsalvation for Israel means the blessing of salvation forthe world.HistoricalTo speak of “our God” is to speak of the God whoengaged with Israel throughout their long historicaljourney. Indeed the story of the covenants in the Bible isthe story of God, and vice versa. God engages with realpeople in real history, and the Bible is the story of thatengagement. The succession of covenants recorded inthe Old Testament presents to us the developing storyof God’s saving response to the plight of humanity. Thecovenant with Noah ensures the continuation of life onearth—it provides the universal platform on which ithas been possible for us to live as a sinful human raceon a cursed planet with some assurance of survival.The covenant with Abraham launches the communityof blessing—both blessed and being a blessing to thenations. The covenant at Sinai through Moses binds thatnational community to Yahweh after the great salvationof the Exodus. The covenant with David echoes theAbrahamic, provides Israel with the dubious historicalphenomenon of kingship, but points beyond that to amessianic rule that will transcend the historical throneof David. The new covenant of prophetic promisepage 6 points forward to the era in which we now live on thisside of the incarnation and Easter, and on beyond eventhat to the future hope of new creation.1Biblical salvation, then, because it is embodied inthe historical covenants, is not merely a set of doctrinesto be learned or an esoteric personal experience to beenjoyed. It is fundamentally a story, or rather, the Story.It is constituted within the grand biblical metanarrativethat forms the biblical worldview, of creation, fall,redemption in history, and the new creation that liesahead. All the particular historical moments and allthe doctrinal minutiae only make sense within thatoverarching framework. The gospel is the good newsabout what the biblical God has done, is doing, andwill finally do within history. Salvation, therefore, inboth Testaments, shares in this past, present, andfuture shape of the whole biblical story. God has savedhis people in many great events of the past; God isconstantly engaged in hearing the cry for salvation inthe present; and God will ultimately save his peopleand his creation forever.The great doxology of the redeemed in Revelation 7,then, celebrates the salvation of the God whose savingwork encompasses the whole of biblical covenantalhistory. To celebrate salvation is to retell that story.HolisticSince the experience of salvation lies within thehistorical covenant relationship, it has a very broadand comprehensive range of significance—in both Oldand New Testaments. “God saves” covers a huge rangeof realities precisely because of the immense variety ofcircumstances in which God’s saving engagement withpeople takes place through the great sweep of biblicalhistory. We ought to resist the temptation to discountwhat we might regard as “ordinary” or “material” oreven trivial instances of the language of salvation andto isolate only those we might deem “theological” or“transcendent” or “eternal.” We need to let the wholebiblical witness speak for itself.2So in both Testaments, then, God saves peoplein a wide variety of physical, material, and temporalways from all kinds of need, danger, and threat. Butof course, and also in both Testaments, God’s savingaction goes much further. The Bible recognizes that allthose proximate evils from which God saves his peopleare manifestations of the far deeper disorder in humanlife. Enemies, lies, disease, oppression, false accusation,violence, death—all of these things from which wepray to be saved are the results of rebellion and sin in thehuman heart. That is where the deepest source of theproblem lies. There is, therefore, a need for God to dealwith sin—sin in the world and sin in his own people.The biblical God who saves is the God who deals with sin.Other claimed salvations of other posturing gods aretinkering cosmetics.So, reviewing the sweep of this section, we cansee the breadth of the biblical language of salvation.EVANGELICAL INTERFAITH DIALOGUE FALL 2010 ISSUE 1.4WWW.EVANGELICALINTERFAITH.COM

ExperientialSalvation is a matter of celebrated experience—whetherin recent personal testimony, as in so many Psalms,or in collective historical memory of the great savingevents that constitute our knowledge of God as Savior,or in the faith imagination of worship and the advancecelebration of an anticipated future. Several aspects ofthis experiential side of salvation may be noted.First, because salvation belongs to our God and istherefore a matter of his initiative and his power, it isexperienced on our side through the ”cry for help” thatis so prominent in the Old Testament (individually andnationally); through repentant turning towards himand away from sin, rebellion or idolatry; through trustin God; and through acceptance of whatever he does inresponse. The salvation of God is for those who callon him, fear him, cry to him, and love him (Psa. 145:1719; Isa. 25:9; Isa. 30:15). And everywhere in the NewTestament, of course, salvation is offered by God’s graceonly on the basis of repentance and faith. As the simpletag goes, we experience salvation by receiving it, not byachieving it.Second, because salvation is covenantal, we aresaved as part of the people of God as a whole andthrough connection to the story of God’s saving actionamong that people. “How can they call on the one theyhave not believed in? And how can they believe in theone of whom they have not heard?” (Rom. 10:14). Thesequestions apply, of course, as much to Israelites in theOld Testament (as Paul does apply them) as to any otherhuman beings. Hence the great importance attached tothe constant teaching of the great traditions of Israel’sfaith, the call to love, trust and obey their covenantalGod, in order to appropriate the blessing of his savingacts on their behalf. The saving God must be known.Above all, God’s people must know the Story. Theymust tell and retell the story of the Exodus. They musttell and retell the story of the cross and resurrection.Salvation is through faith, and “faith comes fromhearing the message, and the message is heard throughthe word of Christ” (Rom. 10:17).Third, because of the importance of the story ofsalvation, we can appreciate the key role of the Scripturesin mediating salvation. For it is in the Bible that wehave the record of those saving events. Here is thetestimony of those who experienced them firsthand—the generation of the Exodus, the witnesses of theEVANGELICAL INTERFAITH DIALOGUE FALL 2010 ISSUE 1.4 WWW.EVANGELICALINTERFAITH.COMcross and resurrection of Jesus.

Salvation is a central topic in Christian theology. Our beliefs about the nature of biblical salvation and the means by which it is attained are critically important to the Christian faith; knowing why these beliefs are so important should be a prerequisite for Evangelicals enteri

Related Documents:

The salvation which God places so much importance on is salvation from sin and its consequences. In order to understand adequately the doctrine of salvation, one must understand the Bible's revelation concerning man's sin and its deserved condemnation. This section of notes will briefly cover the following features of sin: 1) The definition of sin

Christ followers, we understand that we do not contribute anything to our salvation, but that God, through His abundant grace, saves us. He gifts salvation to us, and not only does He gift us salvation, He also gifts us everything necessary for our salvation (Romans 8:28 – 30). Some argue against this understanding. They contend that people

When the wall is depression, then salvation becomes the peace which surpasses all comprehension. When the wall is a struggle with sin, then salvation is purity in the sight of God. When the wall is loneliness, then salvation is fellowship. When the wall is poverty, then salvation is in daily bread. When the wall is illness, then salvation is .

Man’s Need of Salvation: Total Depravity and Man’s Inability Brian Schwertley We begin our study of God’s sovereign grace in salvation with the biblical teaching regarding the effect of the fall upon man and the doctrine of original sin. This teaching is crucial for understanding the doctrine of salvation because one’s

person’s salvation, but merely making salvation possible between God and sinful man. Man’s Need of Salvation: Total Depravity and Man’s Inability We begin our study of God’s sovereign grace in salvation with the biblical teaching regarding the effect of the fall upon man and the doctrine of original sin. This teaching is crucial

GCSE Religious Studies lesson plan: Salvation: spiritual or practical? 3 Teaching notes 1: Salvation a) Teach that Christians (mostly) accept two premises about life: i) humans are in a state of sin, and ii) there is such a thing as salvation from si

Salvation Army Personnel Salvation Army workers, including Officers, Employees and Volunteers (including Lay Leaders/Local Officers and Soldiers where applicable); Cadets in The Salvation Army College for Officer Training. 2:2 Minor Youth under the age of 18 2:3 Vulnerable Adult Any person 18 years of age or older who cannot completely care for

Jewish Siddurs (Jewish Prayer Books) that relate to salvation by works. As Messianic Believers we omit these prayers related to the works of man to salvation. We understand where our Salvation comes from. (Titus 3:4-7; Phil 3:7-11; Rom 11:5-6). Salvation comes by believing in