Ionizing Radiation In Earth's Atmosphere And In Space Near Earth

1y ago
2 Views
2 Downloads
741.01 KB
32 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Mika Lloyd
Transcription

Federal AviationAdministrationDOT/FAA/AM-11/9Office of Aerospace MedicineWashington, DC 20591Ionizing Radiation in Earth’sAtmosphere and in SpaceNear EarthWallace FriedbergKyle CopelandCivil Aerospace Medical InstituteFederal Aviation AdministrationOklahoma City, OK 73125May 2011Final ReportOK-11-0024-JAH

NOTICEThis document is disseminated under the sponsorshipof the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interestof information exchange. The United States Governmentassumes no liability for the contents thereof.This publication and all Office of Aerospace Medicinetechnical reports are available in full-text from the CivilAerospace Medical Institute’s publications Web ports

Technical Report Documentation Page1. Report No.2. Government Accession No.DOT/FAA/AM-11/94. Title and Subtitle3. Recipient's Catalog No.Ionizing Radiation in Earth's Atmosphere and in Space Near Earth5. Report DateMay 20116. Performing Organization Code7. Author(s)8. Performing Organization Report No.Friedberg W, Copeland K9. Performing Organization Name and Address10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)FAA Civil Aerospace Medical InstituteP.O. Box 25082Oklahoma City, OK 7312511. Contract or Grant No.12. Sponsoring Agency name and Address13. Type of Report and Period CoveredOffice of Aerospace MedicineFederal Aviation Administration800 Independence Ave., S.W.Washington, DC 2059114. Sponsoring Agency Code15. Supplemental Notes16. AbstractThe Civil Aerospace Medical Institute of the FAA is charged with identifying health hazards in air travel and incommercial human space travel. This report addresses one of these hazards – ionizing radiation.Ionizing radiation is a subatomic particle of matter or packet of energy (photon) with sufficient energy to eject anorbital electron from an atom. Charged subatomic particles from exploding stars (supernovae) are a constantsource of ionizing radiation in the atmosphere and in space. In space another constant source of ionizingradiation is the solar wind from the Sun. The solar wind consists mostly of electrons and protons with energiesbetween 10 and 100 keV. The Sun undergoes an approximately 11-year cycle of rise and decline in activity andduring its active phase there is an increased emission of the solar wind and occasional eruptions of high-energyparticles (coronal mass ejections). Other sources of ionizing radiation during air travel include radioactive cargo,radioactive substances released into the atmosphere as a result of a nuclear reactor accident or terrorist activity,lightning, and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes.A health effect following exposure to ionizing radiation for which the severity is radiation dose related is called adeterministic effect (non-stochastic effect, tissue reaction). Deterministic effects may occur soon after radiationexposure. For example, nausea and vomiting might be experienced by a space traveler a few hours after receivinga large dose of ionizing radiation while outside a space vehicle during a coronal mass ejection.If the probability (risk) of a health effect after exposure to ionizing radiation is dose related, it is called astochastic effect. Such effects seldom occur until years after the radiation exposure. Examples of stochastic effectsare cancer and genetic disorders. If one or both parents are irradiated prior to conceiving a child, there is a risk ofgenetic disorders in the child and in its progeny.The report can be used as a source book for instruction on ionizing radiation exposure of air and space travelers.17. Key WordsIonizing Radiation, Cosmic Radiation, RadioactiveContamination, Space Weather, Geoomagnetism,Radiation Exposure Limits, Flight Doses, Radiation HealthRisks19. Security Classif. (of this report)Unclassified20. Security Classif. (of this page)UnclassifiedForm DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)18. Distribution StatementDocument is available to the public through theDefense Technical Information Center, Ft. Belvoir, VA22060; and the National Technical InformationService, Springfield, VA 2216121. No. of Pages2822. PriceReproduction of completed page authorizedi

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSFor help in preparing this report we thank: Katherine Wade, Roni G. Anderson, Michael E. Wayda, Dr.William S. Irving Jr., and Frances E. Duke of the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute; Herbert H. Sauer of theNational Geophysical Data Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Dr. Donald E. Parker(Professor Emeritus) of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Dr. Edgar B. Darden Jr. (retired)of the Oak Ridge Associated Universities; Daniel Friedberg, Jacqueline Bist, and Anielia M. Bist.iii

ContentsINTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1IONIZING RADIATION DOSE TERMINOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Linear Energy Transfer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Relative Biological Effectiveness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Gray . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Gray Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Organ Equivalent Dose (Equivalent Dose). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Dose Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Effective Dose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Effective Dose Equivalent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Sievert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Atmospheric Layers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5GALACTIC COSMIC RADIATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Composition and Sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Galactic Cosmic Radiation in Earth’s Atmosphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8THE SUN AND ITS EMISSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Layers of the Sun’s Atmosphere. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Sunspots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Solar Wind . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Coronal Mass Ejection and Solar Flare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Solar Proton Event. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10RECOMMENDED IONIZING RADIATION DOSE LIMITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10International Commission on Radiological Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11European Union. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE DURING AIR AND SPACE TRAVEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Radiation Doses Received During Air Travel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Radiation Doses Received During Space Travel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15HEALTH EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Deterministic Effects (Non-Stochastic Effects, Tissue Reactions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Stochastic Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Prenatal Irradiation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION IN EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Lightning and Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21CONCLUDING REMARKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21v

Ionizing Radiation in Earth’s Atmosphereand in Space Near EarthINTRODUCTIONan atom before decaying. Neutrinos and antineutrinos passthrough matter with almost no effect, and usually they arenot considered in dose calculations.Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen in 1895 discovered ionizingradiation while experimenting with a Crookes tube (a primitive vacuum tube) (2). Working in a dark room with the tubein a carton, Roentgen found that a paper plate coated withbarium platinocyanide (a chemical that fluoresces when exposed to UV light from the Sun), which was outside the cartonand 9 feet away from the tube, emitted a fluorescent lightwhen the tube was supplied with electric current. Roentgenconcluded that an invisible radiation from the tube, whichhe called X-rays, penetrated the wall of the carton and traveled to the barium platinocyanide. He could not deflect theradiation with a magnetic field, and he found that objects inthe path of the radiation showed variable transparency. Witha photographic plate, Roentgen used the device to make apicture of the skeleton of his wife’s hand (3).Antoine-Henri Becquerel in 1896 discovered a naturalsource of ionizing radiation while investigating phosphorescence (4). He observed that a photographic plate coveredwith an opaque paper was fogged when placed near uranylpotassium sulfate (a uranium salt). Becquerel demonstratedthat unlike X-rays, the radiation from uranium could bedeflected by a magnetic field and therefore consisted ofcharged particles.Theodore Wulf measured ionizing radiation levels withan electroscope at the bottom and at the top of the EiffelTower (300 m high) and found that radiation levels at thetop of the tower were higher than at ground level (5). In1912, Victor F. Hess measured ionization rates with anelectroscope during balloon flights (6). He found that atan altitude of 5 km the ionization rate was several timesthe rate at ground level. Hess concluded that a highlypenetrating radiation enters the atmosphere from above.The radiation is now called cosmic radiation. Listed inThe U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s)Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) is chargedwith identifying health hazards in air travel and in commercial human space travel. This report addresses one ofthese hazards – ionizing radiation.Air and space travelers are constantly exposed to galacticcosmic radiation (GCR), which is ionizing radiation fromexploding stars (supernovae). They are also exposed tosolar cosmic radiation (SCR), which is ionizing radiationfrom the Sun. Other sources of ionizing radiation include:radioactive air cargo, radioactive substances released intothe atmosphere from a detonated nuclear weapon or froma nuclear reactor as the result of an accident or terroristattack, lightning, and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs).Radiation is energy in transit. The energy travels as (a)subatomic particles of matter (e.g., electrons, neutrons,protons, alpha particles, pions, muons), and (b) photons,which are packets of electromagnetic energy (e.g., visiblelight, ultraviolet [UV] light, radio waves, microwaves,gamma radiation, X-radiation).Ionizing radiation is a subatomic particle or photon sufficiently energetic to directly or indirectly eject an orbitalelectron from an atom. Photons and electrically-chargedparticles ionize directly by means of electromagnetism.Neutrons cannot ionize directly, but they can ionizeindirectly. On impacting the nucleus of an atom (e.g.,atmospheric nitrogen or oxygen), a neutron can (a) induce emission of a gamma-radiation photon by nuclearexcitation, or (b) break apart the nucleus and releaseprotons (which can ionize directly), neutrons (which candecay into protons and electrons), and pions (which canundergo decay processes shown in Table 1).Muons are the main contributor to dose at low altitudes.Neutral pions decay so rapidly that they are unlikely to impactTable 1. Decay of pions and of their muon decay products (1).ParticleDecay ProductsHalf-life(seconds)positive pion 1 positive muon 1 muon-neutrino1.8 x 10-8negative pion 1 negative muon 1 muon-antineutrino1.8 x 10-8neutral pion 2 gamma-radiation photons6 x 10-17****positive muon 1 positron (positive electron) 1 electron-neutrino 1 muon-antineutrino1.5 x 10-6negative muon 1 electron 1 electron-antineutrino 1 muon-neutrino1.5 x 10-61

Table 2. Typical worldwide annual doses of ionizingradiation to an adult human at ground level, from naturalsources (7).Effective dose (mSv a)galactic cosmic radiation0.39terrestrial gamma radiation b0.46radionuclides in the body (except radon) cradon and its decay productsd0.231.3Total2.38aDescribed in the section entitled Ionizing Radiation Terminology.Sources include uranium-238, radium-226, thorium-232, potassium-40, andcesium-137.cPotassium-40 and carbon-14.dRadon-222 is a decay product of radium-226, which is a decay product ofuranium-238. Some areas have high concentrations of uranium-238 in the soil.Radon-222, a gas, leaks into homes from the ground underneath. Inhaled radontravels through the bronchial tubes to the lungs and decays into polonium-210, asolid.bTable 2 are radiation levels received by humans on Earthfrom natural sources.Living material consists of molecules composed ofatoms held together by electron bonds. Ejection of orbitalelectrons can break the bonds that combine atoms asmolecules. Particularly harmful to a biological system isthe breakup of molecules of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).DNA carries information required for the function andreproduction of an organism. Improper repair of DNAdamaged by ionizing radiation or by free radicals produced by ionizing radiation may lead to cancer (8). Freeradicals are also believed to have a role in the etiology ofatherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and other diseases.A free radical is an electrically neutral atom or moleculecontaining one or more unpaired electrons in the valenceshell, and this makes it very reactive. Ionizing radiationparticles produce free radicals when they react with thewater in cells and with some cellular components.Visible light, UV light, radio waves, and microwavesare non-ionizing radiations. A photon of non-ionizingradiation or a subatomic particle insufficiently energeticto eject an orbital electron may interact with an atom byelectron excitation. This process forces an orbital electron to a higher energy level. An electron so affected isin an unstable energy level and soon falls back to a morestable level, releasing energy in the form of non-ionizingphotons. The photons released include thermal photonsand light photons of different wavelengths. The auroraborealis (northern polar lights) and the aurora australis(southern polar lights) result from the excitation ofatmospheric atoms by charged particles from the Sun(solar wind). Auroras are commonly centered over themagnetic poles of the Earth, between 60o and 70o northand south geographic latitudes. Occasionally, duringhigh solar activity they are seen at lower latitudes. Alsoduring high solar activity, some particles from the innerVan Allen radiation belt (described in the section entitledEarth’s Magnetic Field) may enter the atmosphere andcontribute to the aurora display.IONIZING RADIATION DOSETERMINOLOGYRadiation dose is the amount of energy absorbed bya medium. The medium could be the human body ora particular tissue or organ in the body. Various termsare used to quantify the absorbed dose and its biologicalimpact.Linear Energy TransferLinear energy transfer (LET, Table 3) is the averageamount of energy per unit track length imparted to amedium by ionizing radiation of a specified energy, whenpenetrating a short distance. The energy imparted to themedium includes energy from any secondary radiation,Table 3. Typical LET values of variousradiations.Type of radiationcobalt-60 gamma-radiation0.3250 kVp X-radiation2.10 MeV protons4.7150 MeV protonsrecoil protons from fission neutrons14 MeV neutrons2.5 MeV alpha particles2 GeV Fe nuclei2LET (keV/µm)0.545.12.166.1000.

Table 4. Gy x RBE Gy-Eq (10).Type and energy of the radiationGrayGray (Gy) is the International System (SI) unit ofabsorbed dose of ionizing radiation. One Gy is 1 joule(J) of radiation energy absorbed per kilogram (kg) ofmatter. The rad (radiation absorbed dose) is an olderunit of absorbed dose of ionizing radiation (1 Gy 100rads). The roentgen (R) is another older unit of ionizingradiation. One R is the amount of X-radiation or gammaradiation that creates 1 electrostatic unit (esu) of ionsin 1 milliliter (ml) of air at 00 C and 760 torr (760 mmmercury, 1 atm). The effect of 1 R and 1 rad on dry airis about the same.RBElow-LET radiations (e.g., photons, electrons)1.0protons 2 MeV1.5heavy ions (e.g., helium, carbon, neon, argon)2.5neutrons 5 MeV6.05 MeV5.0 5 MeV3.5Example Calculation of Gy-Eq:A whole-body dose consisting of 4 Gy of 50 MeV protons and2 Gy of 50 MeV neutrons,(4 Gy x RBE 1.5) (2 Gy x RBE 3.5) 13 Gy-Eq.Gray EquivalentGray equivalent (Gy-Eq) is a measure of the capacity ofionizing radiation to cause deterministic effects (describedin the section entitled Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation).Gy-Eq is Gy multiplied by a recommended RBE (Table4). The RBE takes into account that ionizing radiationof different types and energies affects living organismsdifferently.such as nuclear particles released from a nucleus impactedby a high-energy neutron. LET is usually expressed inunits of keV/μm (thousand electron volts per micrometer). A radiation with an LET 10 keV/μm is generallyconsidered low LET.Relative Biological EffectivenessRelative biological effectiveness (RBE) is the ratio ofabsorbed dose of a reference radiation (usually 250 kVpX-radiation or cobalt-60 gamma-radiation) to absorbeddose of the radiation in question, in producing the samemagnitude of the same effect in a particular experimentalorganism or tissue.The RBE is influenced by the biological endpoint andthe LET of the radiation. With killing human cells as theendpoint, the RBE increases with an increase in LET toabout 100 keV/µm and then decreases with further increasein LET. At LET 100 keV/µm, the average separation betweenionizing events is close to the diameter of the DNA doublehelix. Therefore, a radiation with LET 100 keV/µm canmost efficiently produce a double-strand break in a DNAmolecule by a single LET track (9). Double-strand breaksin DNA molecules are the main cause of biological effects.Organ Equivalent Dose (Equivalent Dose)Organ equivalent dose is the total absorbed dose to aspecific tissue or to a conceptus, after the absorbed dosefrom each radiation incident on the tissue or conceptus ismultiplied by a radiation weighting factor (wR, Table 5).For multiple radiations, the organ equivalent dose is thesum of the individual organ equivalent doses. wR takesinto account the effectiveness of the primary radiation(or radiations) and all secondary radiations. wR is an RBEfor stochastic effects.Dose EquivalentDose equivalent is the total absorbed dose to a specifictissue or a conceptus, after the absorbed dose from eachradiation incident on the tissue or conceptus is multipliedTable 5. Radiation weighting factor(wR); takes into account the type andenergy of the radiation (11).wRType and energy of the radiationlow-LET radiation: photons, electrons, muons1aprotons, charged pions2alpha particles,b fission fragments, heavy ions20neutrons (energy, En):En 1 MeV2.5 18.2 x exp[-(ln(En))2 /6]1 En 50 MeV5.0 17.0 x exp[-(ln(2En))2 /6]En 50 MeV2.5 3.25 x exp[-(ln(0.04En))2 /6]aHydrogen-2 (deuterons) and hydrogen-3 (tritons) have the same LET and track structure as protons,therefore the same radiation weighting factor (wR 2) seems appropriate.bHelium-3 (helions) has nearly the same LET and track structure as alpha particles, therefore the sameradiation weighting factor (wR 20) seems appropriate.3

Table 6. Quality factor (Q); takes intoaccount the LET of the radiation (12).QaLET (keV/µm) 10110-1000.32 x LET - 2.2300 x LET -1/2 100aQ should be rounded to the nearest whole number.Table 7. Tissue weighting factor (wT); takes into account whereradiation energy is deposited (11).wTΣ wTremainder tissues, red bone-marrow, breast, colon, lung, stomach0.120.72gonads0.080.08bladder, esophagus, liver, thyroid0.040.16bone surface, brain, salivary glands, skin0.010.04Total1.00Where radiation energy depositedaaRemainder tissues (males 13, females 13): adrenals, extrathoracic region, gall bladder, heart,kidneys, lymph nodes, muscle, oral mucosa, pancreas, prostate, small intestine, spleen, thymus,uterus/cervix. For each remainder tissue wT 0.12/13 0.00923. (females do not have a prostateand males do not have a uterus/cervix).Example Estimate effective dose to a Reference Person (adult) from external isotropic exposure toheavy ions:(1) Estimate absorbed dose in each tissue of an adult female and of an adult male, using a MonteCarlo transport code such as MCNPX (from Radiation Safety Information Computing Centerat Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN), and mathematical models of the bodies,such as the ICRP Reference Phantoms (13).(2) For each tissue, multiply absorbed dose by the appropriate wR (Table 5). Tissues that receivedonly trivial amounts of radiation may be excluded from dose calculations.(3) For each tissue, average wR-adjusted absorbed doses to the female and the male.(4) For each tissue, multiply sex-averaged wR-adjusted absorbed dose by the appropriate wT(Table 7).(5) Effective dose to the Reference Person is the sum of sex-averaged wR-adjusted and wT-adjustedabsorbed doses to tissues.by a radiation quality factor (Q, Table 6). For multipleradiations, the dose equivalent is the sum of the individualdose equivalents. Q relates the LET of the radiation to itsRBE. Dose equivalent is no longer used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)but is still used by the National Council on RadiationProtection and Measurements (NCRP) and the NationalAeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Doseequivalent is used by NASA as a surrogate for organequivalent dose in space radiation applications.Effective Dose EquivalentEffective dose equivalent is the total sex-averaged,whole-body absorbed dose, after the absorbed dose toeach tissue or organ from each radiation incident onthe body and/or from each internal radiation emitteris multiplied by a radiation quality factor (Q, Table 6)and by a wT (Table 7). NCRP considers effective doseequivalent as an acceptable approximation of effectivedose, and they use it as a surrogate for effective dose inspace radiation applications.Effective DoseEffective dose is the total sex-averaged, whole-bodyabsorbed dose, after the absorbed dose to each tissue fromeach radiation incident on the body and/or from eachinternal radiation emitter is multiplied by a radiationweighting factor (wR, Table 5) and by a tissue weightingfactor (wT, Table 7). wT takes into account the risk ofstochastic effects from irradiation of a particular tissue.SievertSievert (Sv) is the SI unit of organ equivalent dose,dose equivalent, effective dose, and effective doseequivalent. It is a measure of harm to the body fromstochastic effects of ionizing radiation (described in thesection entitled Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation). Theroentgen equivalent man (rem) is an older measure ofharm (1 Sv 100 rem).4

EARTH’S ATMOSPHEREmagnetosphere is the region around Earth influenced byEarth’s magnetic field (geomagnetic field) (18). This regionis used to reflect radio signals over long distances and itis where auroral displays occur (14). On rare occasions,known as Polar Cap Absorption (PCA) events, the solarradiation increases ionization and enhances absorptionof radio signals passing through the region, enough toabsorb most (if not all) transpolar high-frequency radiotransmissions (19). In extreme cases, PCA events can lastseveral days, but they usually last less than one day (19).Gravity retains Earth’s atmosphere. The content (percent by volume) of the atmosphere (dry air) is about 78%nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.034% (average)carbon dioxide, and trace amounts of other gases (14). Avariable amount, 0.001-7%, of water vapor is also present(14). For aviation, the boundary between the atmosphereand outer space is 100 km (328 kft) above Earth’s surface.Atmospheric LayersAtmospheric layers, from lower to higher, are: troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere, thermosphere, andexosphere. With increase in altitude, temperatures decreasein the troposphere, increase in the stratosphere, decreasein the mesosphere, and increase in the thermosphere (14).Troposphere: extends from Earth’s surface to between8-10 km near the poles and 16-18 km in tropical regions,with some variation due to weather conditions (14). Itcontains about 80% of the atmosphere’s mass, and it iswhere most daily weather occurs that is observed from theground (15). Traditional subsonic jetliners fly at altitudesof 6-12 km (20-40 kft). The Concorde SST cruised at14-18 km (45-60 kft).Tropopause: the boundary between the troposphereand the stratosphere (14). The tropopause is where airceases to cool with height, and it is almost completelydry (14).Stratosphere: extends from the troposphere to about50 km (14, 15). The ozone and oxygen in the stratosphereabsorb much of the UV radiation from the Sun (15). UVradiation can be very harmful to living tissues.Stratopause: is the level of transition between thestratosphere and the mesosphere (14).Mesosphere: extends from 50 km to 80-85 km (15).Most meteors become visible between about 65 and 120km above the Earth and disintegrate at altitudes of 50-95km (16). Millions enter Earth’s atmosphere every day.Mesopause: the level of transition between the mesosphere and the thermosphere (14).Thermosphere: extends from 80-85 km to morethan 500 km (15). The International Space Station(ISS) orbits Earth at an altitude of 330-400 km, in thethermosphere (17).Exosphere: the highest atmospheric layer. It is whereEarth’s atmosphere merges with interplanetary space (14).In this region the probability of interatomic collisions isso low that some atoms traveling upward have enoughvelocity to escape Earth’s gravity (15).Ionosphere: contains both ions and neutral moleculesand extends from about 80 km to 480 km (14). Theionosphere typically overlaps the thermosphere and exosphere, and it is the inner edge of the magnetosphere. TheEARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELDAccording to the dynamo theory, most of the geomagnetic field is generated by the rotation of liquid iron inEarth’s outer core (20). Other sources include the ringcurrent (discussed later in this section) and magnetism inEarth’s rocks. At Earth’s surface, the geomagnetic field ispredominantly an axial dipole (like a bar magnet), withmagnetic field lines radiating between its north and southmagnetic poles. Magnetic field lines are used to indicatethe strength and direction of a magnetic field. On a mapof geomagnetic field lines, the strength of the field isrepresented by the density of the field lines. The denserthe field lines, the stronger the magnetic field. Thus, thefield is strongest where the field lines are closest together.The direction of the geomagnetic field is the same as thefield lines. It is usually indicated by arrows drawn on thefield lines, which run from the north magnetic pole (nearthe south geographic pole) to the south magnetic pole(near the north geographic pole).The geomagnetic field is not uniformly produced, andthe coordinates of the magnetic poles change frequently.The polarity has reversed at irregular intervals of aboutone million years, and the field is becoming weaker atsuch a rate that it will disappear in about 2,000 years.However, this may only be a temporary trend (18). Ifthe magnetic field does disappear, the radiation belts(described below) would disappear and worldwide GCRlevels would increase to what they are in the polar regions.The direction of the magnetic force on a movingcharged particle is at right angles (perpendicular) to boththe particle’s direction of motion (v) and direction of themagnetic field lines (B). The magnitude of the magneticforce (F) is proportional to the particle’s electric charge(q), the particle’s speed (v), the strength of the magneticfield (B), and the sine of the angle bet

radioactive substances released into the atmosphere as a result of a nuclear reactor accident or terrorist activity, lightning, and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes. A health effect following exposure to ionizing radiation for which the severity is radiation dose related is called a deterministic effect (non-stochastic effect, tissue reaction).

Related Documents:

Ionizing radiation: Ionizing radiation is the highenergy radiation that - causes most of the concerns about radiation exposure during military service. Ionizing radiation contains enough energy to remove an electron (ionize) from an atom or molecule and to damage DNA in cells.

Ionizing & Non-Ionizing Radiation Interest in this area of potential human hazard stems, in part, from the magnitude of harm or damage that an individual who is exposed can experience. It is widely known that the risks associated with exposures to ionizing radiation are significantly greater than compa-rable exposures to non-ionizing radiation.

Non-ionizing radiation. Low frequency sources of non-ionizing radiation are not known to present health risks. High frequency sources of ionizing radiation (such as the sun and ultraviolet radiation) can cause burns and tissue damage with overexposure. 4. Does image and demonstration B represent the effects of non-ionizing or ionizing radiation?

Non-Ionizing Radiation Non-ionizing radiation includes both low frequency radiation and moderately high frequency radiation, including radio waves, microwaves and infrared radiation, visible light, and lower frequency ultraviolet radiation. Non-ionizing radiation has enough energy to move around the atoms in a molecule or cause them to vibrate .

you about non-ionizing radiation, such as microwaves, ultrasound, or ultraviolet radiation. Exposure to ionizing radiation can come from many sources. You can learn when and where you may be exposed to sources of ionizing radiation in the exposure section below. One source of exposure is from hazardous waste sites that contain radioactive waste.

Ionizing radiation can be classified into two catego-ries: photons (X-radiation and gamma radiation) and particles (alpha and beta particles and neutrons). Five types or sources of ionizing radiation are listed in the Report on Carcinogens as known to be hu-man carcinogens, in four separate listings: X-radiation and gamma radiation .

The use of the term non-ionizing radiation in this document is defined as meaning non-ionizing radiation produced as a result of normal equipment use and which is at such a level that is recognized as harmful to humans. NOTE: This procedure does not cover non-ionizing radiation generated during welding, cutting, or burning activities. 1.2 POLICY

non-ionizing EMF radiation exposure safety standards are based primarily on stand-alone radiation exposures. When combined with other agents, the adverse effects of non-ionizing EMF radiation on biological systems may be more severe. Much work remains to be done before definitive statements about non-ionizing