Tire Companies Marketshares

1y ago
19 Views
2 Downloads
740.35 KB
18 Pages
Last View : 14d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Esmeralda Toy
Transcription

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 1425 LARGEST GLOBALTIRE COMPANIESBRANDMARKETSHARESThe ever-shifting tire landscape makesit difficult to pin down an accurate picture of the industry overall. To helpsteady the target, we’ve compiled thiscomprehensive Tire Market Profile section.Combining real-world data from arange of resources with results from TIREREVIEW’s annual Tire Dealer Profile, thissection will help you gain a better perspective of our industry, help you seeemerging trends, and better prepare yourbusiness for what lies ahead.Through painstaking research, we’vebeen able to assemble this collection ofdata, which includes: the top 25 globaltiremakers; dealer channel tire brandmarketshares; tire shipments for passenger, light truck/SUV, medium truck, OTR,ag/forestry; a look at the OE and replacement segments of the high performancemarket; the most popular tire sizes at OEand replacement levels; brand and channel segmentation; new vehicle sales andvehicle registrations, as well as milesdriven by vehicle type.Added to this is our annual survey ofhundreds of independent tire dealersthroughout North America, who offeredtheir insights on the structure and size oftoday’s tire dealer, as well as a look at tirepricing levels, buying patterns, averagegross margins, and much more.Top 25 Global Tire Manufacturers – 2010[Note: Figures given are from corporate financial reports and TR estimates. Many companieslisted here produce and sell non-tire goods, and amounts shown here are for all revenue.All figures in millions, U.S. dollars.]CompanyTIRE SHIPMENTS,TOP SIZES & PRICINGTIRE DEALERTRENDS & BUSINESSBREAKDOWN14TIRE REVIEWBridgestone Corp.Continental AGGroupe MichelinGoodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd.Pirelli & C SpAYokohama Rubber Corp.Hankook Tire Co.Toyo Tire & Rubber Co.Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Triangle Group Co.Cheng Shin Rubber/MaxxisHangzhou Zhongce Rubber Co.Kumho Tire Co.Shandong Linglong Rubber Co.Apollo Tyres Ltd.MRF Ltd.JK Tyre & IndustriesDouble Coin Holdings Ltd.Xingyuan Tyre Co.Nokian Tyres plcNexen Tire Corp.Qingdao Doublestar Industrial Co.Chengshan Group Co.Giti Tire (China) Investment Co.- alyJapanSouth KoreaJapanU.S.ChinaTaiwanChinaSouth KoreaChinaIndiaIndiaIndiaChinaChinaFinlandSouth KoreaChinaChinaChina2010 Sales 34,900 34,500 23,500 18,800 7,400 6,400 6,200 5,100 3,500 3,300 3,300 2,900 2,500 2,400 2,200 1,900 1,800 1,300 1,100 1,000 990 950 900 705 546

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 15DEALER CHANNEL BRAND MARKETSHAREP-Metric Tires2010 RMA Replacement Shipments: 201.3 million(Shares Rounded to Nearest 0.05%)BrandDealer ShareGoodyear.13.90%Michelin .8.75%Firestone .8.55%Bridgestone .7.30%BFGoodrich .4.75%Cooper .4.70%General .3.45%Hankook .2.75%Toyo .2.70%Uniroyal .2.60%Yokohama .2.65%BrandDealer ShareMulti-Mile .2.55%Kumho .2.40%Continental .2.25%Dunlop .2.20%Kelly .2.00%Mastercraft .1.90%Hercules .1.85%Dayton .1.75%Cordovan.1.65%Delta.1.50%Pirelli .1.30%BrandDealer ShareFalken .1.25%Nexen .1.15%Sumitomo .1.00%Nitto .0.95%Big O .0.85%Sigma .0.80%Fuzion.0.75%Regul .0.70%Dean .0.60%National .0.50%Others .8.00%LT-Metric2010 RMA Replacement Shipments: 29.1 million(Shares Rounded to Nearest 0.05%)BrandDealer ShareGoodyear.11.35%BFGoodrich .8.80%Bridgestone .7.20%Michelin .7.20%Firestone .6.90%Cooper .6.60%Multi-Mile .5.40%General .5.15%Toyo .3.25%Mastercraft .2.85%Yokohama .2.80%BrandDealer ShareContinental .2.35%Hankook .2.35%Uniroyal .2.35%Cordovan.2.25%Kelly .2.20%Kumho .1.90%Delta.1.85%Dunlop .1.65%Falken .1.35%Pirelli .1.35%Hercules .1.05%BrandDealer ShareMaxxis .0.85%Big O .0.75%Dayton .0.75%Eldorado .0.75%Nexen .0.75%Laramie .0.65%National .0.65%Mickey Thompson.0.60%Sigma .0.55%Others .5.55%Medium Truck2010 RMA Replacement Shipments: 15.8 million(Shares Rounded to Nearest 0.05%)BrandDealer ShareBridgestone .17.90%Goodyear.17.10%Michelin .16.90%Firestone .6.90%Yokohama .5.65%Kelly .3.85%Continental .3.20%General .3.00%Hankook .2.90%Dunlop .2.85%BrandDealer ShareToyo .2.75%Cooper/Roadmaster .2.00%Kumho .1.95%Hercules .1.70%Double Coin.1.60%Sumitomo .1.55%DynaTrak .1.25%Gladiator .1.25%BFGoodrich .1.10%Others.4.60%(Source: TR Estimates)September/2011 -t i r e r e v i e w. c o m15

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 16DEALER CHANNEL BRAND MARKETSHARESPerformance(H-Rated & Above)Agricultural2010 Industry Replacement Shipments:2.12 million2010 RMA Replacement Shipments:55.7 million(Shares Rounded to Nearest 0.05%)Rear Tire Segment(Shares Rounded to Nearest 0.05%)BrandDealer ShareGoodyear .14.20%Michelin .12.80%Bridgestone .8.90%Yokohama .7.60%Toyo.7.00%BFGoodrich .6.55%Firestone .5.20%Kumho .4.30%Falken .4.15%Dunlop .3.70%Pirelli.3.25%Hankook.2.90%Cooper .2.55%Continental.2.50%General .2.40%Kelly .2.20%Sumitomo .1.65%Nexen .1.25%Uniroyal .1.05%Fuzion .1.00%Multi-Mile .1.00%Nitto .1.00%Wanli .0.80%Others .1.95%BiasRadialBrandShareShareFirestone .43.25% .35.70%Goodyear .17.50% .31.00%Titan .18.10% .9.95%Universal Co-Op .3.00% .4.35%Michelin.-- .9.80%Harvest King .3.35% .-BKT.6.50% .6.75%Akuret .1.95% .-Alliance .2.15% .1.50%Trelleborg .1.75% .1.75%Others .2.45% .0.80%Front/Implement SegmentBrandDealer ShareFirestone .38.40%Titan .16.80%Goodyear .18.65%Universal Co-Op.5.50%American Farmer .5.40%Harvest King .3.70%BKT .3.45%Trelleborg .2.00%Alliance.1.30%Carlisle .0.50%Others .4.30%OTR2010 Industry Replacement Shipments:196.0 thousand(Shares Rounded to Nearest 0.05%)BiasShareRadialShareBridgestone .9.45% .37.80%Firestone .26.10% .-Michelin .-- .27.60%Goodyear .28.25% .23.60%General .18.10% .-Titan.8.10% .0.20%Others .10.0%.10.80%(Source: TR Estimates)16TIRE REVIEW- September/2011

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 182010 U.S. TIRE interLT-Metric(millions of units)(millions of units)(millions of 60.24.60.33.10(Source: ce: RMA)YearReplacement(Source: RMA)OTRAg/Forestry(millions of units)(thousands of units)(millions of units)ReplacementOERetreads(Source: RMA & TR 8 .81.72 .24.482005.61.51 .74.49 .27.322006.61.72 .74.61 .28.032007.62.63 .75.51 .28.742008.62.57 .74.86 .26.542009.53.18 .63.63 .22.822010.84.51 mentFR.1.3.1.3.1.3.1.3.1.4.1.3.1.4OEFR.0.72 .0.35 .0.66.0.70 .0.34 .0.61.0.71 .0.35 .0.63.0.67 .0.36 .0.65.0.77 .0.36 .0.66.0.63 .0.38 .0.55.0.72 .0.41 .0.602010 TOP TIRE SIZES – U.S.ReplacementP-MetricRankSizeShare1 .P225/60R16 .3.6%2 .P235/75R15 .3.4%3 .P215/60R16 .2.5%4 .P265/70R17 .2.3%5 .P205/65R15 .2.2%6 .P205/55R16 .2.2%7 .P195/65R15 .2.0%8 .P215/70R15 .1.8%9 .P235/70R16 .1.8%10 .215/65R16 .1.8%RankSizeShare1.LT245/75R16 .19.5%2.LT245/75R17 .18.4%3.LT225/75R16 .11.7%4.LT275/65R18 .8.2%5.LT265/70R17 .7.9%6.LT275/70R18 .6.2%7.LT265/70R18 .4.5%8.LT275/65R20 .3.7%9.LT255/75R17 .3.5%10.LT235/80R17 .3.1%- September/2011ReplacementLT-MetricOE P-MetricRankSizeShare1.P215/60R16 .7.0%2.P265/70R17 .5.8%3.P215/55R17 .4.1%4.P235/70R16 .3.5%5.P275/55R20 .3.1%6.P245/65R17 .2.8%7.P225/50R17 .2.6%8.P275/65R18 .2.4%9.P195/60R15 .2.4%10.P245/70R17 .2.3%ReplacementMedium TruckOE LT-MetricTIRE REVIEWOE2004 .36.37 .7.352005 .36.03 .6.702006 . 33.56.5.012007 .34.19 .4.432008 .29.40 .2.902009 .27.48 .2.792010 .29.10 .3.60Medium Truck2004 .16.29 .5.74 .15.842005 .17.52 .6.24 .15.872006 .16.86 .6.83 .14.702007 .16.57 .4.65 .15.202008 .14.80 .3.80 .14.702009 .12.88 .2.42 .13.852010 .15.80 .3.20 .14.7218Replacement2004 .7.902005 .8.452006 .8.082007 .9.242008 .9.502009 .8.802010 .8.70RankSizeRankSizeShare1 .LT245/75R16 .15.1%2 .LT265/75R16 .14.4%3 .LT235/85R16 .8.8%4 .LT265/70R17 .8.4%5 .LT225/75R16 .7.7%6 .LT285/75R16 .5.5%7 .31x10.50R15 .5.0%8 .LT215/85R16 .3.9%9 .LT285/70R17 .2.7%10 .LT245/75R17 .2.6%OE Medium TruckShare1 .295/75R22.5 .28.2%2 .11R22.5 .22.3%3 .11R24.5 .11.6%4 .285/75R24.5 . 6.9%5 .225/70R19.5 . 6.0%RankSizeShare1 .295/75R22.5 .32.5%2 .11R22.5 .28.3%3 .11R24.5.8.1%4 .225/70R19.5.6.4%5 .315/80R22.5.3.5%(Source: RMA)

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 202010 U.S. BRAND-TYPE SHARESP-Metric Replacement(201.30 million units shipped)Private Brands20.13 million10%Associate Brands20.13 millionLT-Metric Replacement(29.10 million units shipped)10%ManufacturerBrands161.04 millionAssociateBrands2.91 million80%10%PrivateBrands2.91 million(Source: RMA)Manufacturer Brands23.28 million80%10%Medium Truck Replacement(15.80 million units shipped)(Source: RMA)Private/Import Brands1.90 million12%Manufacturer Brands11.85 million75%AssociateBrands2.05 million13%(Source: TR Estimates)20TIRE REVIEW- September/2011

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 222010 U.S. DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL SHARESP-Metric(201.30 million units shipped)Other10.06 millionTire Co.-Owned28.18 million5%14%LT-Metric(29.10 million units shipped)MassMerchants1.46 million5%MassMerchants32.21 millionIndependent TireDealers130.85 million16%65%Independent TireDealers22.41 millionTire Co.-Owned4.07 million77%14%(Source: RMA)Other1.16 millionMedium Truck(Source: RMA)(15.80 million units shipped)Truck Dealers0.15 million1%Tire Co.-Owned2.53 million16%4%Truckstops1.11 million7%Independent TireDealers12.01 million76%(Source: TR Estimates)22TIRE REVIEW- September/2011Rapid Response: 800-928-1184 ext. 18008

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 242010 CANADA TIRE SHIPMENTSP-MetricLT-Metric(millions of units)(millions of units)YearReplacementOE2002 .16.17 .11.142003 .16.33 .11.302004 .16.71 .12.632005 .17.59 .12.322006 .16.40 .11.632007 .17.39 .10.692008 .20.93 .7.652009 .19.22 .6.002010 .16.12 .7.91WinterHigh PerformanceMedium Truck(millions of units)(millions of units)(millions of units)YearReplacement2002 .4.462003 .4.432004 .5.292005 .5.972006 .5.292007 .5.442008 .6.952009 .7.552010 .5.28YearReplacement2002 .1.102003 .1.132004 .1.402005 .1.582006 .1.512007 .2.372008 .2.552009 .2.712010 .3.11(Source: Rubber Association of Canada and TREstimates)24YearReplacementOE2002 .2.63 .0.882003 .2.62 .0.802004 .2.60 .0.722005 .2.78 .0.692006 .2.60 .0.642007 .2.74 .0.752008 .2.53 .0.542009 .2.76 .0.102010 .2.70 .0.30TIRE REVIEW- 2010ReplacementOE.1.48 .0.48.1.39 .0.42.1.52 .0.56.1.48 .0.54.1.49 .0.48.1.36 .0.38.1.27 .0.29.1.36 .0.13.1.40 .0.15

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 262010 CANADA BRAND-TYPE SHARESP-Metric(Replacement – 16.12 million units shipped)AssociateBrands1.61 million10%ManufacturerBrands12.90 millionMedium Truck80%(Replacement – 1.40 million units shipped)Private Brands1.61 million10%ManufacturerBrands1.34 millionLT-Metric(Replacement – 2.70 million units shipped)96%Private Brands0.27 millionManufacturerBrands2.03 million10%75%AssociateBrands0.40 million15%(Source: TR Estimates)26TIRE REVIEW- September/2011AssociateBrands0.06 million4%

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 28SPEED-RATED TIRE BREAKDOWNOE Market(% of total 2010 U.S. shipments/millions of units)YearH-RatedV-RatedZ-RatedOther SpeedTotal OERated20047.72%6.85%2.09%79.57%(53.00) .4.09 .3.63 .1.11 .42.172005 .7.6% .8.52% .2.64%.78.46%(52.73) .4.01 .4.49 .1.39 .41.372006 .9.1% .12.1% .3.3%.70.3%(48.18) .4.40 .5.81 .1.61 .33.872007 .11.7% .12.5% .3.1%.69.7%(46.26) .5.43 .5.79 .1.44 .32.232008 .13.8% .14.6% .3.7%.64.1%(37.60) .5.2 .5.5 .1.4 .24.12009 .15.0% .15.0% .2.4%.63.0%(24.60) .3.7 .3.7 .0.6 .15.52010 .17.9% .13.6% .2.8%.62.0%(33.10) .5.9 .4.5 .0.9 .20.5(Source: RMA)Replacement Market(% of total 2010 U.S. shipments/millions of units)YearH-RatedV-RatedZ-RatedOther SpeedTotal ReplacementRated2004 .13.74%.3.45% .3.48% .57.40%(199.18) .27.37 .6.87 .6.93 .114.322005 .14.31%.4.16% .4.07% .60.99%(202.31) .28.96 .8.42 .8.24 .123.382006 .15.3%.4.8% .4.9% .57.5%(196.16) .30.03 .9.41 .9.54 .112.882007 .15.5%.5.0% .5.2% .55.3%(204.03) .31.62.10.16 .10.60 .112.852008 .15.2%.5.5% .5.3% .53.8%(195.10) .29.7.10.7 .10.4 .104.92009 .14.9%.6.0% .5.6% .54.6%(189.52) .28.3.11.4 .10.6 .103.52010 .15.2%.6.5% .6.0% .53.2%(201.30) .30.5.13.1 .12.1 .107.0(Source: RMA)28TIRE REVIEW- September/2011

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 30VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS, SALES & MILEAGEU.S. Total Registrations(millions of vehicles)Canada Total Registrations(millions of sTrucksVehicles2003.131.07 .87.30 .2.87 .7.47 .225.842004.132.47 .92.51 .2.95 .7.63 .232.612005.133.91 .98.08 .3.08 .7.98 .239.972006.135.05 .102.04 .3.24 .8.35 .245.442007.135.22 .105.69 .3.35 .8.58 .249.492008.135.52 .106.56 .3.42 .8.72 .250.802009.133.05 .108.46 .3.42 .8.61 .250.132010.130.28 .109.74 .3.40 .8.60 rucksVehicles2003 .11.02.7.13.0.20 .0.53 .18.882004 .11.11.7.21.0.21 .0.55 .19.082005 .11.17.7.19.0.22 .0.56 .19.142006 .11.29.7.20.0.24 .0.57 .19.302007 .11.60.7.54.0.26 .0.59 .19.992008 .11.55.6.92.0.24 .0.53 .19.242009 .12.33.8.24.0.26 .0.60 .21.432010 .13.07.8.73.0.28 .0.63 .22.71(Source: AAIA)(Source: Statistics Canada, TR Estimates)U.S. New Vehicle Sales(millions of sticImportTotal3.40 .4.20 .7.603.20 .4.30 .7.503.10 .4.40 .7.503.10 .4.60 .7.702.80 .4.80 .7.602.30 .4.50 .6.801.70 .3.70 .5.401.80 .3.80 .5.60LT/SUVDomesticImportTotal6.60 .2.40 .9.006.70 .2.70 .9.406.40 .2.80 .9.205.80 .3.00 .8.805.40 .3.00 .8.404.00 .2.40 .6.402.90 .2.00 .4.903.40 .2.50 .5.90TrucksClassClass4-67-80.14 .0.230.17 .0.290.19 .0.350.20 .0.380.18 .0.250.13 .0.190.08 .0.150.08 .0.16TotalTotalVehicles.0.37 .12.00.0.47 .17.33.0.54 .17.30.0.58 .17.15.0.43 .16.45.0.32 .13.54.0.23 .10.59.0.24 .11.70(Source: AAIA)U.S. Travel In Millionsof Vehicle Miles(all roads and 1.2,979,175.2,999,634(Source: US Dept. of Transportation)30TIRE REVIEW- September/2011Average Age ofCars & Light TrucksPassenger LightAll LightYearCarsTrucksVehicles2000 .9.1 .8.5 .8.92001 .9.3 .8.4 .8.92002 .9.4 .8.4 .9.02003 .9.6 .8.5 .9.12004 .9.8 .8.6 .9.42005 .10.0 .8.7 .9.52006 .10.1 .8.8 .9.72007 .10.4 .9.0 .9.82008 .10.6 .9.3 .10.02009 .10.8 .9.8 .10.32010 .11.0 .10.1 .10.6(Source: AAIA, R.L. Polk & Co.)

14-46 Tire Market Profile Layout 1 9/22/11 1:31 PM Page 32U.S. VEHICLE SALES BY TYPEU.S. Top 10 Passenger Car SalesBrand20092010% Change09/10Toyota Camry .352,541 .328,242 .-6.9%Honda Accord.286,242 .281,564 .-1.6%Toyota Corolla .294,665 .269,774 .-8.4%Honda Civic .258,343 .259,315 .0.4%Nissan Altima.202,902 .224,465 .10.6%Ford Fusion .177,526 .219,030 .23.4%Chevrolet Malibu .159,023 .199,233 .25.3%Hyundai Sonata .117,180 .196,999 .68.1%Chevrolet Impala .166,051 .172,863 .4.1%Ford Focus .158,584 .172,334 .8.7%Top 10 Passenge

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. U.S. 18,800 Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd. Japan 7,400 Pirelli & C SpA Italy 6,400 Yokohama Rubber Corp. Japan 6,200 Hankook Tire Co. South Korea 5,100 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co. Japan 3,500 Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. U.S. 3,300 Triangle Group Co. China 3,300 Cheng Shin Rubber/Maxxis Taiwan 2,900

Related Documents:

Tire Gauges TIRE REPAIR TIRE GAUGES Digital, lighted display, tire gauge 5-99 PSI Accuracy /- 1 PSI PSI and BAR settings Built-in tire depth gauge Victor Digital Carabiner Tire Gauge VIC 22-5-80003-8 Digital, backlit display, tire gauge 5-99 PSI . Rasp tools included for improved torque Includes (5) 4-inch .

These are tire charts for Checkered Flag Tire Beads. Scroll Down For Tire Charts Look at the correct section for your type tires 1. The tire beads DO NOT work with all tire sizes. If you do not see your tire size on the charts please contact us before you purchase. 2. If you are using PVC sewer pipe inside your tires as some sort of bead lock / run

(800) 227-5592 (475) 329-5158 www.TIRE-TRACK.com info@tire-track.com Developed by TIRE-TRACK, LLC Track Tire Performance Track Cost per Mile / 32nd Improve Inventory Control Improve Purchase & Maintenance Decisions Ensure Maximum Tire Life Improve Safety Reduce Vehicle Downtime Improve Data Accuracy Deter Theft

and tire pressures. Two twin tire and three wide-base tire types were compared. Three axle loads were used for each type. Three tire air pressures were used for each axle load and tire type. The load was seldom evenly distributed on both twin tires. That con dition was simulated with different tire pressures (500 kPa and 1000 kPa) in the twin .

Chock Wheel – Diagonal to tire being changed 4.1 Use two wheel chocks on the tire diagonal to the tire being changed. For example, when changing the right rear tire, chock the front left tire 4.2 Sandwich the tire between the wheel chocks by placing one block in front and one block

Chock Wheel – Diagonal to tire being changed 4.1 Use two wheel chocks on the tire diagonal to the tire being changed. For example, when changing the right rear tire, chock the front left tire. 4.2 Sandwich the tire between the wheel chocks by placing one

In addition, studded tire traffic data were collected through a phone survey performed by Portland State University. On the basis of traffic data and studded tire and rut depth measurements, the rate of studded tire depth per studded tire pass was calculated. The results showed that studded tire

kadar asam folat di bawah normal, yaitu folat serum 3 ng/ml dan folat eritrosit 130 ng/mL (Mayes, 2007). Defisiensi folat ini dapat terjadi karena akibat langsung dari kurangnya konsumsi .