Cover Page THE FMWR-IUCN-NCF KOMADUGU YOBE

2y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
225.22 KB
37 Pages
Last View : 25d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Braxton Mach
Transcription

Cover PageTHE FMWR-IUCN-NCF KOMADUGU YOBE BASINPROJECT FOR IMPROVING LAND AND WATERRESOURCES MANAGEMENT(Phase I: Improving the Institutional Framework for WaterManagement in the Komadugu Yobe Basin)End of Project Phase Evaluation ReportByJibrin M. Jibrin, PhDDepartment of AgronomyBayero University, P.M.B. 3011, KanoNigeriaMay 2007

AcknowledgementThe map on the cover page is by courtesy of the DFID-JWL Project.ii

.Executive SummaryThe Komadugu Yobe Basin (KYB) project is a joint initiative of the then Nigeria FederalMinistry of Water Resources (now the Nigeria Federal Ministry of Agriculture and WaterResources) the World Conservation Union and Nigerian Conservation Foundation aimedat improving equitable and sustainable management of land and water resources in theKYB. Phase 1 of the project with duration of 2 years and three months has the main aimof improving the institutional framework for managing water resources in the basin. Thisphase of the project has the following main components: (a) establishment and sharing ofa sound knowledge base to facilitate stakeholder negotiations and inform decisionmaking; (b) pilot-testing of improved water management interventions in selected sites inthe basin; (c) development of a Catchment Management Plan; (d) adoption of a watermanagement charter and establishment of the appropriate institutional framework forimplementing agreed management principles; and (e) effective management of the KYBproject.This report is the result of an external evaluation exercise commissioned by the ProjectManagement Unit (PMU) of the KYB project at the end of phase 1 of the project toassess the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability of the projectactivities and results. The assessment was carried by reviewing reports and documentsproduced during the course of the lifetime supplemented by interviews with the projectstakeholders. Major findings of the exercise show that: The basin has until now been characterized by growing tension and risk ofconflict, uncoordinated development, inequitable access to water resources,unclear and fragmented regulatory responsibilities, and environmentaldegradation. There were huge knowledge gaps and lack of information with respect to manyenvironmental, social, and economic aspects of the basin. The project was welcomed enthusiastically by most stakeholders and interestgroups in the basin because it sought to address issues of common interest. A broad spectrum of stakeholders and interest groups were involved in the KYBproject in a participatory manner and the project sought to effectively exploit theareas of strengths the stakeholders built on previous successes. Right from infancy the project faced funding constraints, despite which all themajor project deliverables were achieved.The project evaluation team concluded that the project was effectively and efficientlymanaged and the project design and approach was relevant in addressing the identifiedneeds, issues and challenges facing the people and the environment in the KYB. Theteam recommended that the achievements made should be consolidated immediately byfollowing-up with the second phase of the project.iii

AbstractTitle, author and date of the evaluation report: Improving the Institutional Frameworkfor Water Management in the Komadugu Yobe Basin : End of Project Phase EvaluationReport by J. M. Jibrin, May 2007Objectives of the project or the programme: (a) establishment and sharing of a soundknowledge base to facilitate stakeholder negotiations and inform decision-making; (b)pilot-testing of improved water management interventions in selected sites in the basin; (c)development of a Catchment Management Plan; (d) adoption of a water managementcharter and establishment of the appropriate institutional framework for implementingagreed management principles; and (e) effective management of the KYB projectIUCN area of specialisation: ?Geographical area: The Komadugu Yobe Basin ( north-eastern Nigeria and south-eastern Niger)Project duration: May 2005 to June 2007Overall budget of the project or programme: Initially 1,308,368 but revised to 751,307Donors: WANI/DGIS, FMAWR and LCBC/GEF ProjectObjectives of the evaluation: to judge the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impactand the sustainability of the project activities and their results in line with IUCNevaluation policy. The outcome of the evaluation will also serve as an input in theplanning of the subsequent phase of the project.Type of evaluation: Final (End of Project Phase)Period covered by the evaluation: May 2005 to April 2007Commissioned by: Project Coordination Unit (PCU) of the KYB projectAudience:Evaluation team:ExternalInternalMixed external/internalQuestions of evaluations: (reference to TORs)Relevance: Establish whether or not the project design and approach was relevant in addressing theidentified needs, issues and challenges facing people, and the environment?To what extent does the project contribute to overall Key Results and strategies of IUCN?Efficiency: Were the resources efficiently managed and utilised? (Finances – procedures ; Assets - use)Were the Outputs generated as expected (in quality and time)?Were there any unforeseen problems, how well were they dealt with?iv

Effectiveness: To what extent did the outputs (planned & unplanned) contribute to the OverallObjectives? Why? Why not? (Capacities of project partners, Availability & use of resources, etc)Sustainability: Was the approach used likely to ensure a continued benefit and/or use of the outputs andoutcomes after the end of the project? Why/ Why not? (Established structures, mechanisms, financialresources, materials; Levels of stakeholder participation; Levels of partners & stakeholder engagement)Impact: What impacts did the project have on: a) The people (Income, Equity (gender, etc.), participationin decision making processes); b) the Environment (Species and Ecosystem Health?). Were there anyunintended positive or negative impacts arising from particular outcomes? c) Socio economic aspect(poverty reduction etc.)Methodology used: Reviews of reports and documents produced in the course of theproject lifetime supplemented by interviews with the project stakeholders. Interviewswith the stakeholders were undertaken using open and semi-open questioning techniques.Findings: (1) The project has fostered strong linkages especially with the Federal andState Ministries as well as other projects and institutions in the basin, and this wasone of the strengths of the project(2) All the key deliverables envisage in theproject document have been delivered or are about to be delivered fully (3) Theimplemetation of the project was participatory with the involvement of a broadspectrum of stakeholders and interest groups in different levels of the projectactivity and implementation. This will ensure ownership of outputs and outcomes(4) The project was effectively and efficiently managed and the project design andapproach was relevant in addressing the identified needs, issues and challengesfacing the people and the environment in the KYBRecommendations: (1) the achievements made should be consolidated immediately byfollowing-up with the second phase of the project. (2) In future IUCN and its partnersshould ensure that all needed funds are secured before the commencement of the projectso as to improve the efficiency and timeliness of project implementation.Language of the evaluation: EnglishAvailable from: ?v

Table of ContentsCover Page. iAcknowledgement . iiExecutive Summary . iiiAbstract. ivTable of Contents . viList of Acronyms . vii1.0Introduction. 11.1Project Background . 11.1.1The Komadugu Yobe Basin . 11.1.2Problems of the Komadugu Yobe Basin . 21.1.3Goal and Objectives of the KYB Project . 52.0Methodology . 72.1The Evaluation Mission. 72.2Evaluation Criteria . 73.0Results of the Evaluation. 93.1Log-Frame Analysis. 93.1.1: Component 1- Decision Support Knowledge Base . 93.1.2: Component 2- Review of Policy and Institutional framework . 93.1.3: Component 3- Pilot Interventions . 93.1.4: Component 4- Catchment Management Plan. 103.1.5: Component 5- Effective Project Management. 103.2Relevance . 153.3Effectiveness . 163.4Efficiency . 163.5Impact . 173.6Sustainability . 184.0Conclusion and Recommendations . 19Appendices. 20vi

List of FSIWRMCsTACToRUNDPWDIWest Africa Regional Office (Bureau Régional pour l’Afrique de l’Ouest)Catchment Management PlanDepartment for International Development of the United KingdomFederal Ministry of Water ResourcesGlobal Environment FacilityHadejia-Jama’are-Komadugu-Yobe Basin Coordinating CommitteeHadejia-Jamaare River Basin Development AuthorityHadejia Nguru Wetlands Conservation ProjectHadejia Nguru WetlandsHadejia Valley Irrigation ProjectThe World Conservation UnionIntegrated Water Resources ManagementJoint Wetlands LivelihoodKano City Water SupplyKano River Irrigation ProjectKomadugu Yobe BasinLake Chad Basin CommissionMemorandum of UnderstandingNigerian Conservation FoundationNon-Governmental OrganizationsNguru Integrated Farmers AssociationProject Management UnitProject Steering CommitteePetroleum (Special) Trust FundState Integrated Water Resources Management CommitteesTechnical Advisory CommitteeTerms of ReferenceUnited Nations Development ProgrammeWetlands Development Initiativevii

1.0IntroductionThe project for improving land and water resources in the Komadugu Yobe Basin (KYB)is a joint initiative of the then Nigeria Federal Ministry of Water Resources (FMWR) andnow merged to be the Nigeria Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources, theWorld Conservation Union (IUCN), and the Nigerian Conservation Foundation (NCF).The FMWR-IUCN-NCF KYB project (hereafter referred to as KYB project) started withan initial phase of two years and three months with the main objective of improving theinstitutional framework for managing water resources in the KYB. The objective is to beachieved by building consensus on key water management principles andinstitutionalized consultation and coordination mechanisms. This phase of the project hasthe following main components: (a) establishment and sharing of a sound knowledgebase to facilitate stakeholder negotiations and inform decision-making; (b) pilot-testing ofimproved water management interventions in selected sites in the basin; (c) developmentof a Catchment Management Plan; (d) adoption of a water management charter andestablishment of the appropriate institutional framework for implementing agreedmanagement principles; and (e) effective management of the KYB project.The phase I of the project officially ends in June 2007, and in line with IUCN policy andthe planned activities of the KYB project an external evaluation is required to assess theprogress of the project to date as against the project’s planned activities. In line with thisthe Project Monitoring Unit (PMU) of the KYB project commissioned this evaluation inorder to judge the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and the sustainability of theproject activities and their results. The outcome of the evaluation will also serve as aninput in the planning of the subsequent phase of the project. The Terms of Reference(ToR) for the evaluation is presented in Appendix 1.1.1Project Background1.1.1 The Komadugu Yobe BasinThe Komadugu Yobe Basin (KYB) covers a total area of about 148,000 km2 in northeastern Nigeria (comprising about 57% of basin area) and south-eastern Niger(constituting the remaining 43%). The basin is drained by two main river sub-systems.The first sub-system, the Yobe River, is formed by the Hadejia and Jama’are tributaries,which create the Hadejia Nguru floodplain at their juncture. The second sub-system is theKomadugu Gana (or Missau) River. Historically, it is a tributary of the Yobe River. TheNigeria portion of the basin contributes more than 95% of the basin’s water.The network of river systems and wetlands that compose the KYB support a wide rangeof ecological processes and economic activities, including recession agriculture,pastoralism, forest regeneration, fish breeding and production, drought-fall-back security,and tourism potential. Based on these activities, several centers of development, tradingand administration have cropped up along river courses and on floodplains within thebasin, constituting relatively high population concentrations in a dryland region, which ischaracteristically sparsely populated. Today, the livelihood systems of the over 10million people who live in the basin, both in Nigeria and Niger, depend almostexclusively on these activities. The Komadugu-Yobe River is the life-wire of thesecommunities.

The wetlands of the KYB host biodiversity of global significance. In addition toproviding fire-wood and grazing in the dry season, there are also about 100 species offish, about five of which are endemic. There are also some endemic plant species ofagronomic importance, which are threatened with extinction. An important example is avariety of rice that is found in the Gashua to Geidam stretch. In addition, over 370 speciesof birds have been inventoried in the basin, with 33% of them being migratory.The KYB is considered to be of strategic national and international importance. The basinis an area of relatively dense population concentration in a dryland region, with thepopulation critically and increasingly dependent on scarce water resources. It is thesource of internationally shared water whose management in Nigeria has an importantbearing on diplomatic relationships between Nigeria and four countries (Niger, Chad,Cameroon and Central African Republic). These countries share the larger Lake ChadBasin in which is located the KYB. The KYB contains very important wetlands withimmense local, national and international economic and ecological importance, inparticular the Hadejia Nguru Wetlands (HNWs), Nigeria’s premier Ramsar site.1.1.2 Problems of the Komadugu Yobe BasinThe KYB project inception document has highlighted some very serious problems facingKYB in recent years. The basin is threatened by escalating and unsustainable pressuresfrom fast-growing populations and cities as well as expanding agricultural and otheractivities. This is particularly true since the 1970s as the general climate context facechronic variability and deficits in rainfall and surface water resources. In the push foraccelerated economic growth, many basin and national water policies show clearlimitations in their ability to promote equitable and sustainable resource use. Some of thethreats and challenges facing the KYB as highlighted in the project document include:Fast-growing water demand: Due to the semi-arid conditions, which are prevalentin the basin, scarcity of water has been, and continues to be, the major stimuli ofthe major development initiatives, which has placed the integrity of the KYB atrisk. Presently, substantial proportions of the available water sources that canpossibly be economically exploited have already been developed or are in theprocess of being developed.Reduced river flow due to climate variability and change: The pressure on thebasin water resources is accentuated by climate change and variability. Recentclimate patterns show a general decline in average annual rainfall and riverdischarge, leading to numerous second-order impacts. For example, as a result ofa decrease in wet season water flow, silt and weed blockages, and impoundmentsin the upper basin, the Komadugu tributary no longer reaches the Yobe River,which in turn only contributes about 1% of the total water inflow to the LakeChad.Fragmented regulatory responsibilities: The acute scarcity of waternotwithstanding, water resources development in the basin still remains generally2

fragmented, with ill-defined and often conflicting responsibilities betweengovernment agencies and stakeholders concerning all aspects of land and watermanagement. The presence of two River Basin Development Authorities (RBDAs)with responsibility for water management in the basin but with little or no coordination illustrates this institutional caveat. The situation is made worse by lackof reliable hydro-meteorological information on the basin, as the monitoringnetwork, which used to be effective up to the late 1970s is no longer there.Uncoordinated development interventions: Consequent to the above, the hydroagricultural development initiatives in the basin are uncoordinated. This is interms of the small-scale irrigation activities, which have been stimulatedthroughout the basin as well as dam construction leading to the progressiveexpansion of large-scale irrigation schemes.Inequitable access to water resources: Many of these development initiativeshave taken place in the upper reaches of the basin and have often penalisedinhabitants of lower reaches of the basin, whose productive systems are highlydependent on the river flow. For example, the communities downstream ofHadejia town, in the HNWs, along the river banks, as well as the adjoining shoresof Lake Chad, are more dependant for their livelihoods on flood and recessionfarming than on rain-fed farming. This is because rainfall is too low andunreliable in these areas. Against this background, the Hadejia River system ismore than 80% controlled by Tiga and Challawa Gorge dams. These two dams,completed respectively in 1972 and 1992, feed the Kano River Irrigation Project(KRIP), the Hadejia Valley Irrigation Project (HVIP) and the Kano City WaterSupply (KCWS). The process of rehabilitating KRIP-Phase 1 and the expansionof HVIP has just started. While these plans are moving toward implementation,earlier agreements to guarantee certain amounts of flow from the Hadejia Riversystem for the downstream communities, somehow, are not being actualised.Furthermore, although the Jama’are River system, which presently meets theneeds of the downstream communities, is so far uncontrolled, and plans exist tocomplete a dam at Kafin Zaki.Growing tensions and risks of conflicts: The lack of co-ordination in managementand utilisation resulted in higher demand over available water, which leads to atenuous competition for water between sectors (irrigation, domestic and industrialwater use, traditional food production systems, the ecosystem, etc.), and theregions (upstream and downstream states and communities, including southeastern Niger). This is culminating in several instances into conflicts. The bestillustration of this is the dogged opposition of the downstream states of Yobe andBorno to the construction of Kafin Zaki Dam. Even the incessant conflictsbetween farmers and pastoralists are explained, to a large extent, by lack of accessto water for pastoralists.Environmental degradation: Dam operations, which are essentially uncoordinatedwith water needs of other sectors and regions in the basin, led to rainy season3

flows in channels, which used to be essentially perennial. This has created aconducive condition for Typha, an invasive weed, to invade and occupy riverchannels and floodplains. Typha is a major impediment to water flow, fishery andresidual moisture cultivation in the basin today. The channels are also gettingsilted as a result of several factors, including dam operations. Likewise, the recentfloods, which devastated several communities, have been attributed to severalfactors, among which are irregularities in dam operations. The presence of Typhain the channels, as well as siltation, has resulted among other things in a markedreduction in the contribution of flow into Lake Chad by the Yobe River. It hasalso reduced the flow of the Yobe downstream of Gashua, from where it becomesan international watercourse. There is a general environmental degradation in thebasin, characterised by the draining of wetlands and a consequent loss ofbiodiversity, as well as a general disappearance of the seedlings of large trees inthe rangelands of the basin.If the current trends - in terms of demands, uncoordinated interventions, among others continue unchecked, the ecological integrity of the basin may be compromised to theextent that it would fail to provide the necessary goods and services to support humandevelopment and ensure environmental conservation. The current situation in the basintherefore calls for a fair, judicious and sustainable allocation of water resources amongcompeting sectors (irrigation, domestic and industrial water use, traditional foodproduction systems, the ecosystem, etc.), and among the constituent regions (upstreamand downstream states and communities, including south-eastern Niger), such allocationwill have to be based on an improved understanding of hydrological and socio-economicparameters, if dire consequences are to be avoided. It also calls for an integratedmanagement of the land, water and living resources of the basin so as to promote theirsustainable use, conservation and equity in access to them.There have been several past and ongoing interventions in the KYB that address one ormore dimensions of the threats and challenges highlighted above, these include:Establishment of a Basin Coordination Committee: One of the most significantinitiatives targeting the basin is the establishment of a basin coordination committeeby the Federal Government of Nigeria, which was a recommendation of a workshopjointly organised few years earlier by the IUCN-Hadejia Nguru WetlandsConservation Project (HNWCP) and the National Institute for Policy and StrategicStudies. Indeed, in response to conflicting water demands and growing tensions inthe KYB, especially between upstream and downstream States, the FederalGovernment of Nigeria has decided to take the lead in tackling the issues in thebasin. In this regard the Nigerian National Council on Water Resources establisheda Hadejia-Jama'are-Komadugu-Yobe Basin Coordinating Committee (HJKYBCC)in 1999, which in turn established a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). TheHJKYBCC met for the first time in November 2000 and the TAC held its firstmeeting in April 2001.4

Recent studies: The latest comprehensive study of the KYB was carried out in thelate 1990s as part of the Regional Land and Water Resources Development Studycommissioned by Nigerian Federal Government through the Petroleum (Special)Trust Fund. Largely based on this study, the TAC drafted a Basin ManagementPlan for the Coordinating Committee. One of the major findings is that there is noclear assessment and understanding of the status of water resources availability inthe Hadejia-Jama'are-Komadugu-Yobe Basin. On the basis of this finding, a wateraudit was recommended, and would consist in assessing available water in the basin(both surface water and groundwater) and estimating water demands from thevarious sectors, and the various spatial units in the basin. The intention was that thewater audit would be a step toward developing a participatory and an all-inclusiveCatchment Management Plan for which the previous drafted CatchmentManagement Plan developed as part of the above-mentioned Regional Land andWater Resources Development Study will be used as input.UK’s Department for International Development intervention: The Department forInternational Development (DFID) of the UK Government is supporting alivelihood intervention in the basin through a project called the Joint WetlandsLivelihoods (JWL) Project. The goal of the project is to sustainably enhance thelivelihoods of rural poor people dependent on common property resources in theHadejia-Jama’are floodplain and more widely in Nigeria. It also has purpose thatorganizations and individuals with formal and informal power better managecommon property resources in the Hadejia-Jama’are floodplain through using moresustainable and equitable processes. The project has been around for the past fouryears or more.Lake Chad Basin initiative: The Lake Chad Basin Commission (LCBC), incollaboration with the World Bank and United Nation Development Programme(UNDP), is implementing a Global Environment Facility (GEF)-supportedprogramme for the “Reversal of Land and Water Degradation Trends in the LakeChad Basin”. One of the components of this programme is a pilot project on theintegrated management of the KYB, with a component focusing on the wetlands ofthe basin.1.1.3 Goal and Objectives of the KYB ProjectThe long-term goal of the project is the equitable and sustainable use of land and waterresources of the Komadugu Yobe Basin through improved management. The purpose ofphase I of the project is to contribute to this goal by helping establish a framework forbroad-based and informed decision making process based on agreed principles forequitable use and sustainable management of the Komadugu Yobe Basin.The project will help improve consultation mechanisms among main stakeholders groups,including regulators (such as the Federal Government of Nigeria, Niger Government, theLake Chad Basin Commission, riparian States, River Basin agencies, etc.), user groups(municipalities, irrigators, rural communities, etc.), and other interest groups (researchinstitutions, environmental NGOs, etc.).5

The project will also facilitate the participation of all stakeholder groups in thedevelopment of key principles for the management of the Komadugu Yobe Basin. Toachieve this it will facilitate a process to revitalise the basin-wide stakeholder forum. Thisforum will be used to ensure that the various stakeholders, interest groups, water usergroups and basin states take part in the discussions on water allocation and water sharingarrangements, and that their views and needs inform the overall decision-making process.The project will support and complement the current institutional framework, whichrevolves around the HJKYBCC. All States in the basin are represented in this Committeeas well as the Federal Ministries responsible for Water Resources, for Environment, forHealth and for Agriculture. The Committee is chaired by the Federal Minister responsiblefor Water Resources. The Committee established a TAC. The Consultative Committeemet for the first time in November 2000 and the TAC held its first meeting in April 2001.Specific objectives of the project:i.To build decision-support knowledge base so that water management options andother resources management decisions are taken on the basis of up to dateinformation on water audit, socio-economic and ecological conditions.ii.To pilot-test improved water management field interventions so that efficient andsustainable water utilisation techniques and approaches are demonstrated indownstream areas.iii.To help establish a legal and policy enabling environment through the adoptionand implementation of a water charter and supporting basin-level consultation andcoordination mechanisms.iv.Develop a catchment management plan using participatory approaches and on thebasis of the results of knowledge, policy and pilot activity components of theproject. This will also build on the existing draft Catchment Management Plan.v.To ensure that the project is effectively managed, monitored and evaluated, sothat lessons on managing river basins are leaned and disseminated to benefitsimilar initiatives.6

2.0Methodology2.1The Evaluation MissionThe evaluation exercise was undertaken from the 26th to the 30th of March 2007 by ateam comprising of Dr Jibrin M. Jibrin (Consultant, Team Leader), Mrs IbironkeOlubamise (NCF), Engr Dickson Ahagbuje (FMWR), and

Cover Page THE FMWR-IUCN-NCF KOMADUGU YOBE BASIN PROJECT FOR IMPROVING LAND AND WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (Phase I: Improving the Institutional Framework for Water Management in the Komadugu Yobe Basin) End of Project Phase Evaluation Report By Jibrin M. Jibrin, PhD Department of Agron

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Convention IUCN World Heritage Studies Number Seven 2009. About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN works on biodiversity, climate change, energy, human livelihoods and greening the

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

ArtificialIntelligence: A Modern Approachby Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig, c 1995 Prentice-Hall,Inc. Section 2.3. Structure of Intelligent Agents 35 the ideal mapping for much more general situations: agents that can solve a limitless variety of tasks in a limitless variety of environments. Before we discuss how to do this, we need to look at one more requirement that an intelligent agent .