International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)Vol.5, No.4, December2016, pp. 271 283ISSN: 2252-8822 271Teaching with Socio-Scientific Issues in Physical Science:Teacher and Students’ ExperiencesJoy TalensScience Area, College of Education, Arts and Sciences, De La Salle Lipa, PhilippinesArticle InfoABSTRACTArticle history:Socio-scientific issues (SSI) are recommended by many science educatorsworldwide for learners to acquire first hand experience to apply what theylearned in class. This investigated experiences of teacher–researcherand students in using SSI in Physical Science, Second Semester, School Year2012–2013. Latest and controversial news articles on sources of energy werechosen for analysis. Based on the findings, the teacher–researcher was able tochoose issues based on a set of criteria and students related what they learnedinside the classroom with real life situations and its positive and negativeimpact to people and environment. A model of learning approach forteaching SSI in Physical Science was proposed.Received Aug 25, 2016Revised Okt 21, 2016Accepted Nov 26, 2016Keywords:Axial codingPhysical scienceSocio-scientific issuesStudents‟ experiencesTeacher‟s experiencesCopyright 2016 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science.All rights reserved.Corresponding Author:Joe Talens,Science Area, College of Education, Arts and Sciences,De La Salle Lipa, Philippines.Email: firstname.lastname@example.org.INTRODUCTIONPhysical Science is one of the general education courses that enable non–majors acquire scientificknowledge to explain and understand occurrence of natural phenomena. Topics discussed in this subjectshould deal with controversial issues that can be subjected to public debate  and will make the studentsaware that science is part of public policy issue  reflected by the growth in citizen responsiveness toscientific issued in the form of citizen juries . Thus, science teaching should involve make students realizethe connection between science and society  as they prepare themselves as future citizens .One of the active strategies is socio–scientific issues (SSI) that calls upon a different type ofpedagogy.SSI has been integrated in many science curricula worldwide  because of its potential forcreating a more real, humane image of scientific activity and for promoting scientific literacy . Likewise, itdevelops an awareness of the interdependency between science and society , and allows students to beinvolved as active citizens .Considering that to be scientifically literate one needs to have the ability to make thoughtfuldecisions about SSI  and many science educators shared that curricula in industrialized countries areincorporating SSI in their classroom supported by studies cited above, the researcher believes that study onteaching SSI in Physical Science: teacher‟s and non–majors‟ experiences particularly on the topic sources ofenergy will provide additional information and insights on how to implement and learn through this activeteaching strategy. Likewise, the researcher being the one who will handle the subject has already been usingSSI in the course of her teaching but failed to document them, thus, the researcher accepts the challenge totry this strategy in her classroom and propose a model of approach for teaching SSI in a Physical Scienceclass having in mind that the need for the inclusion of SSI into science curricula has been generally accepted,but relatively few science teachers have incorporated SSI into their courses ,. A model of approach forteaching SSI will be the output of this paper becausethere is no monolithic approach to the teaching of SSIJournal homepage: http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE
272 ISSN:2252-8822.Moreover, this paper will also look into concept of Transformative Learning among General Educationsubjects in the La Sallian schools to attain its mission of teaching minds, touching hearts and transforminglives as the non-majors are being honed to become citizens who are are scientifically literate and able toengage effectively with controversial issues in everyday life. This approach of learning is based onconstructivist framework that considers learning as a personal process that happens within, and to the learner.It does not only place the learner at the center of the process, but it also makes the learning process anauthentic venue for personal growth and development . Likewise, Zeidler and Nicols (2009) as cited byAligaen (2012) pointed out that engaging students in SSI is personally meaningful and engaging that requiresthe use of evidence-based reasoning and provide a context for understanding scientific information .2.RESEARCH METHODThis study utilized qualitative method of research particularly participatory action research (PAR) toinvestigate how students‟ work with socio-scientific issues in the topic sources of energy in Physical Scienceclass (Transformative Learning). Likewise, PAR was employed because it involves more documentingcarefully and recording action and what people think about it in ways others found accessible . Moreover,PAR offers a powerful and empowering approach to educational evaluation in which there is an activepartnership between researchers and researched.Two hundred twenty students who comprised the five sections of business courses of De La SalleLipa enrolled in Physical Science (Transformative Learning Class) during the Second Semester School Year2012–2013 werethe participants of this study with the researcher as the one conducting the lesson whileobserving them.An interview guide was constructed to investigate how students‟ work with socio-scientificissues in the topic sources of energy in Physical Science class (Transformative Learning). Likewise,documentary analysis (journal writing), observation and triangulation of data will be considered in thecollection of data.Responses of students in the interview guide were analyzed using axial coding technique inwhich codes or themes were generated and related to one another.This study involved continuing spiral ofplanning, acting, observing, reflecting and then re-planning and so round the spiral again .2.1. PlanningThe researcher planned on what SSI will be given to the participants based on School and SocialIssues Model for Teaching SSI  which considers hierarchy (scientist/teachers-student); source ofknowledge (corpus of science and other disciplines); view of knowledge (science to be known is correct butthe emphasis is on the methods and procedures of science rather than facts. Science diffuses out into socialapplications but there is some transparency about the scientific process); controversy (takes place within theclassroom but might involve analyzing science in newspapers distinguishing rhetoric from evidence);pedagogy (teacher controls content but might be a facilitator in discussion); and assessment (testsargumentation abilities, use of warrants to support claims). Likewise, the teacher-researcher considered somecharacteristics of SSI as enumerated by Radcliffe & Grace (2003) as cited by Ekborg & Ottander (2006) as:they are important for society, have a basis for science, involve forming opinions, are frequently mediareported, address local, national and global dimensions with attendant political and societal framework,involve values and ethical reasoning, may involve consideration of sustainable development and may requiresome understanding of probability and risks and there are “no right” answers.2.2. ActingAfter the researcher had chosen the issue on sources of energy, the researcher discussed the contentsof the lesson and integrated SSI. The researcher grouped students to share their argumentation based on theguide questions for the said activity.2.3. ObservingWhile participants were involved in group discussion, the researcher observed what will transpireduring the argumentation.Note-taking was done in the process.2.4. ReflectingParticipants were required to write and submit a reflection and focus group interview was conductedon experiences of non-majors in using SSI in learning sources of energy.2.5. Re-planningAfter considering all other stages, the researcher with the shared experiences of the non-majorsrevised or reconsidered the School and Social Issues Model for Teaching.IJERE Vol. 5, No. 4, December 2016 : 271-283
IJEREISSN: 2252-8822 2733.RESULTS AND ANALYSISIn discussing the results of this study, the School and Social Issues model by Levinson (2008) wasused by the researcher through axial coding to analyze experiences of the teacher and students . Based onthe findings of this study, a model of learning approach for teaching SSI was proposed.3.1. Knowledge of Science will help students as citizens in the making to hold and express a view onissues which enter the arena of public debate and perhaps become actively involved in some areasMost students were able to read comprehensively the articles.Some of them shared that they read thearticles three to five times to understand the issue.Others shared that they had to scan, skim and jot downimportant points in the articles. One student shared that indeed extensive reading should be done that was thereason why he read the article 12 times. After reading, many students explained that they analyzed the issuethrough the help of guide questions given. They did this to gather important ideas that will help answer thequestions. One student emphasized that:“analyzing SSI required them to read between and beyond the linesthat did not only require them to focus on the main issue or idea but careful explorationof the contents of thearticles should be done.”Another student argued that:“this activity entailed us to search for more factsparticularly on the topic Bataan Nuclear Power Plant because the article was not enough to present prosand cons of harnessing this non-renewable source of energy.” He further emphasized that:“I really had to look on each of the very details of the issue.Thus, careful investigation should bedone before one can make a stand on an issue like this”. They also shared that after analyzing the article,they even compared the contents of the articles they gathered and their notes in Physical Science. After doingthis, most students conducted brainstorming activity with their partner. Other students shared that:“in theprocess of brainstorming, they were able to discuss things on sources of energy that were not been discussedin the classroom and will no longer answer the guide questions before arriving at their stand on theSSI.”Others said they even experienced brainstorming within themselves. Some claimed that there are stillquestions in their minds that were left unanswered particularly on energy consumption.In terms of consequences, most students shared that:“analyzing SSI enabled them to look into thepros and cons of harnessing nuclear and hydroelectric energy as well as fossil fuels through relating issuesto what they learned in class and the facts that they searched in the internet.”Several students shared thattruly jumping into conclusion at once without first analyzing the issue will lead one to nowhere same withproblems on energy.In terms of meanings, the non-majors explained that learning SSI on sources of energy gave themthe chance to express their own interpretations of the issues.One student further explained that:“SSI alsoenabledme to widen my understanding why people keep on holding to what they believe in and fighting forlike what happened in the construction of a hydroelectric power plant in Mindanao people sacrificed theirlives to express that they opposed the building of thatsource of energy in favor of their ancestral landandcultural heritage”. Likewise, some students shared that through SSI they were able to learn that there aremany differentplaces in the Philippines to obtain energy. Others added that some of these places arecommonly heard and others are most unlikely. In addition to this, one non-major questioned why not allpeople know about where energy in our country comes from. She cited that“I am just wondering whether wereally have many places in the country where we can getenergy. I only heard about dams and falls. Whyyuntil now not all citizens know where we get energy? We just thought that we really have to import fromother countries.”To explain this further, one non-major said that:“it is good to know that our country hasthese alternative sources of energy and familiarity with its history as well as their advantages anddisadvantages are made known through analyzing SSI.”Another student said that:“I came to realize thatevery conflict and issue our country is facing rooted from limited sources of energy.Thus, it is but proper tounderstandthat we can harness alternative sources of energy which analyzing SSI provided.”As observed by the teacher–researcher, non–majors gathered a lot of information to analyze SSI.During classroom discussion, students actively participated by adding information to the lesson based onwhat they read and researched on. As an example, several students volunteered to explain how to generateenergy from solar cells.They explained in their own words and through example advantagesand disadvantages of solar power. They were able to enumerate provinces like in Cagayan de Oro inMindanao, Philippines. It was also observed that students asked questions on the topic. One of the questionsraised was on the construction of Pulanggi IV Hydroelectric Power Plant in Mindanao in which people had tosacrifice their lives to stop the construction of the power plant in the place where minorities live. Studentsalso looked into the situation in Mindanao where power interruption is a problem especially during summermonths. There were some of them who were in favor of relocating the minorities in favor of continuous andsufficient power supply. Through the use of SSI, classroom discussion made meaningful and lively.Likewise, when students were asked to rank all the sources of energy, students were able to rank and givereasons for considering them. It was also observed that non–majors who were able to express their viewsTeaching with Socio-Scientific Issues in Physical Science: Teacher and Students' Experiences (Joy Talens)
274 ISSN:2252-8822and opinions on the topic.They even cited specific instances or examples of sources of energy and pointedout experiences in harnessing energy in the Philippines and different parts of the world. Students alsoexpressed their views and opinions to defend each answer.Thus, SSI enabled non–majors to enhance orstrengthen their knowledge in Physical Science particularly on sources of energy.Figure 1 shows how teacher and students experienced the use of SSI in the classroom. Studentsexpressed their views and opinions issues that on issues that affect society by considering what they learnedduring the discussion, read from articles and searched from the Internet.a.b.c.d.learn from classroom discussionread articles comprehensivelyconducted brainstorming activitysearched for more facts on the issueslooked into pros and cons of the issuesexpressed one‟s own interpretations of the issuesFigure 1. Summary of axial coding for expressing one‟s views or opinions on the issueMorley (2011) supported the findings that the course should deal with controversial issues subjectedto public debate . Non–majors were confronted with issues on sources of energy which affect all membersof the society. It is also important to consider that a key demand for contemporary science education isincreasing awareness of science as a public policy issue  reflected by the growth in citizen responsivenessto scientific issued in the form of citizen juries . This is related to the present study in which henon-majors were able to express their views and opinions on sources of energy in the country. Thus, strongersocietal orientation in science teaching remains . Likewise, being citizens of the near future, students willmake decisions requiring an understanding of the interaction of science and technology and its interface withsociety . Thus, teaching through SSI enabled the non–majors not only to learn more about the topic butmore importantly they were able to express their opinions and views on the topic.3.2. Individuals Understand The Method Which Science Derives The Evidence for The Claims Madeby Scientists In terms of strategies, all students followed the steps involved in scientific method to analyze SSI.Aside from this, all students shared that while reading the articles; they listed down or jot down importantpoints that will enable them to answer the guide questions. Others shared that after reading the article, theyjotted down unfamiliar words and look for their meanings in the dictionary or connect these words to thesituations. Others claimed that they remembered key words to analyze the issue. Some of them said that theydid outlining particularly mental outlining. They did note-taking to collect important details. In relation tothis, one student added that she outlined the facts that could be of great help in answer ring the guidequestions. Others shared that when they first read the entire article and encountered difficult words or deepwords, they managed to search for their synonyms. There were some students who shared that theyconstructed diagrams while reading the articles.After that they went back to the diagram and explain what thediagram means.Others constructed their own sentences and sometimes paraphrase parts of the articles toprove that we understand the SSI in the articles concerning energy. A group of students shared that theymarked all the important points in the articles so that it would be easy for them to locate those points whenthey will answer the guide questions pertaining or related to that. There were students who emphasized thatafter reading, the article they thought first of the pros and cons of harnessing this sources of energy in thatway they can understand the issues.It was found also that in following the steps in scientific method as whatone student observed that:“all students surf the internet to help them analyze the SSI and find additionalinformation on hydroelectric power plant in Mindanao, Bataan Nuclear Power Plantand BernhamRise.”According to one of the students, “information found in the internet helped her tounderstand words in the articles that are difficult to understand. Articles in the internet also providebackground information on the topic.”It also supplements our discussion in the classroom so that when theIJERE Vol. 5, No. 4, December 2016 : 271-283
IJEREISSN: 2252-8822 275lessons in class, the articles and the researches gathered from the internet are combined, conclusions can bearrived at. Thus,a decision can be made regarding one‟s stand on the issues.”Likewise, one student added thatfrom the gathered articles in the internet, she was able to carefully delineate facts on the articles with socioscientific issues.” Moreover, another student explained that:“after reading the articles several timesparticularly an article on Bernham Rise, I was able to browse other examples or similar scenarios all overthe world andcompare their similarities and differences which could help me to come up with clearunderstanding of the topic and make a stand on the issue.” There were groups of students who claimed thatthey read many books related to the article. After reading, they evaluated the pros and cons of every decisionmade by personalities involved in the issues. Likewise, they classified important statements of each sidewhether opinion or fact.Indeed, the non-majors never stopped in finding ways to analyze SSI.They conductedbig group discussions during their freetime. They shared each other‟s ideas and opinions and write themdown. Through this, they proved that they understand the scenario and all the details from the
Science Area, College of Education , Arts and Sciences, De La Salle Lipa , Philippines. Email: email@example.com 1. INTRODUCTION Physical Science is one of the general education courses that enable non–majors acquire scientific knowledge to explain and understand occurrence of natural phenomena. Topics discussed in this subject
Socio-Scientific Issues Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI): Socio-scientific issues are complex, open- ended issues that embed science content and practices within the social issues in which they occur. SSI instruction contextualizes science learning within societal issues and provides an opportunity for students to learn science in the same fashion
An understanding of the Cape Town, South African Socio- Economic Reality. South African Student Protests as a result of Social and Economic Exclusion. Our US students and the Socio-Psychological Impact on them because of the South African Socio-Economic Context. Study
Since the socio-cultural approach to creativity emerged only recently, more research dealing with socio-cultural factors and creativity is needed. In 1996, the impact of socio-cultural factors on creativity was the least developed area in creativity research "by any measure—volume of research publications, number of investigators engaged in
Modern teaching methods and strategies Part I . Language teaching methodology, or teaching in this sense, is a set of methods based on the same rules and having a common aim, e.g. to encourage students to use the language, involve the studentsFile Size: 732KBPage Count: 55Explore further150 Teaching Methodsteaching.uncc.eduTEACHING TECHNIQUES - Oneontaemployees.oneonta.edu/thomasrl/Y (PDF) 50 METHODS OF TEACHING.pdf GRACE SIKALEYA .www.academia.eduChapter 4 Current approaches and teaching methods .www4.ujaen.es/ gluque/Chapter4H Teaching Methods and Strategies: The Complete Guidewww.educationcorner.comRecommended to you b
Preface Safety and Special Notices ii Thermo Scientific BindIt Software for KingFisher Instruments User Manual Thermo Scientific Thermo Scientific KingFisher Presto User Manual (Cat. no. N17413) Thermo Scientific KingFisher 96 User Manual (Cat. no. 15018890) The Thermo Scientific BindIt Software user manual can be found in PDF format in the
2 scientific method 2.1 TYPES - SCIENTIFIC METHODS: The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.
Recall the definition for scientific notation 1. Change these LARGE scientific notation numbers to standard notation and vice versa. Make up a number for the blank cells. Scientific Notation Standard Notation Scientific Notation Standard Notation a. 6.345 10 e. 5,320 b. 8.04 10 % f. 420,000 c. 4.26 10 & g. 9,040,000,000 d. h. 2. Now try .
scientific notation. Operations in Scientific Notation 1. Perform the calculations on the “number” parts in the front of the scientific notation numbers. 2. Use rules of exponents on the 10n parts of the numbers in scientific notation. 3. Make sure your answer is in scientific notation, if